In the year of 218 BCE, the extent of the Roman Empire was on what is now Italy, some of the islands, and small territories on the Balkans.
Explanation:
The Roman Republic in 218 BCE was still at the beginning of its expansion. The Roman had only recently managed to gain control of the Apennine Peninsula (Italy), Sicily, Sardinia, Corsica, and small parts of what are now Croatia and Albania. While it may not seem as much, these territories gave the Roman a stronghold and advantage for further expansion in the time to come.
Having their republic largely based on a peninsula, as well as several islands and coastal areas, the Romans were able to benefit a lot from trade. Also, the territory had good natural defense, which made the republic more or less safe from outside attacks, thus it was able to develop and grow stronger without any particular problem.
The territories that the Romans managed to conquer in the following period were:
Gaulbig portion of BritainBalkan PeninsulaIberian Peninsulathe coastal part of North AfricaAnatoliathe eastern Mediterranean coastLearn more about the Roman conquest of Italy https://brainly.com/question/1049920
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
The extent of the Roman Republic in 218 BCE was at the bottom of Europe, likely Italy and around there.
Explanation:
Match the characteristics to the correct event.
1. is c.
2. is a.
3. is b.
The English Bill of Rights of 1689 declares “the pretender power of suspending the laws to the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal” , a declaration supporting which concepts?
The Bill of Rights of 1689 was one of the results of the Glorious Revolution 1688-1689. It was rooted in tensions between Protestants and Catholics and also between Parliament and King James II, who was ousted in favor of his Protestant daughter Mary and William of Orange -- a joint monarchy. The document uses the concepts of liberty, legality and consent, among others.
The english who realized Glorious Revolution and produced the Bill of Rights were demanding that royal power was based not in divine rights but in consent from the Parliament. The refered declaration supported the concepts of legality, political participation and the principle of power based on a elected Parliament. From now on kings and queens should reign following limits legally created by the Parliament, which should always exist and be composed of elected representatives.
Answer:
limited government and consent of the governed
Explanation:
Which statements describe the Bonus March?
Choose all answer that are correct?
ended with the army attacking the Bonus Army.
was made up of World War I veterans and their families.
was attended by President Hoover.
was held to ask that veterans be paid their bonuses earlier than 1945.
The following statements describe the Bonus March
ended with the army attacking the Bonus Armywas made up of World War I veterans and their familieswas held to ask that veterans be paid their bonuses earlier than 1945Explanation:
President Hoover published a speech on 28 July in which he alluded twice to so-called "bonus marchers" and added: "A significant number of names have been checked, which indicates that much of the others are not veterans; many of them are radicals and people with criminal backgrounds."
After World War I success, in 1924, the US government has promised service employees a bonus in 1945. The "Tombstone Bonus" was also identified.
Since Congress voted for cash over President Franklin Roosevelt's own veto, four years later, in 1936, the veterans got their bonus. During the Second World War, Congress approved the GI in 1944. Law, to help veterans get a better education .
The answers are:
A.(ended with the army attacking the Bonus Army)
B.(was made up of World War I veterans and their families)
D.(was held to ask that veterans be paid their bonuses earlier than 1945)
I took the test, hope this helps!
Explain how general Cornwallis was trapped on the Yorktown peninsula
Answer:Cornwallis was trapped by the Comte de Grasse by sea through de Grasse’ naval blockade and by Washington and Rochambeau forces on land
Explanation:
Answer:Yorktown was on a peninsula and could be surrounded.
Explanation:
Which part of a historical essay is used to make a reader interested in the
essay's topic and summarize its key ideas?
The part of a historical essay to draw your reader in the essay's topic and summarize it key idea is a thesis Statement.
What is a essay?The essay is a piece of writing that is intended to present a concept, make a case, convey a feeling, or start a discussion. It is a tool for presenting writers' ideas in a non-fictional context.
The topic being covered, the arguments made in the paper, and the target audience are all included in the thesis statement. The last sentence of your introduction, usually known as your first paragraph, should contain your thesis statement. Use it to arouse readers' interest in your subject and persuade them to read more.
Therefore, a thesis statement make a reader interested in the essay's topic and summarize its key ideas.
To learn more about essay, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/20426054
#SPJ2
When driving through the streets of New York early in the morning, what type of cloud sometimes reduces visibility?
o cumulus
O stratus
O fog
cirrus
Which circumstances helped cause the Dust Bowl of the 1930s?
Choose all answers that are correct.(k12) and ill give BRAINLEESSNESS
a.high winds
b.light soil
c.too much plowing of grasslands
d.too much rain year after year
Answer:
A,b,c
Explanation:
too much plowing of the grasslands causes light soil which was picked up by the high winds in order to cause the dust bowl
Too much mowing of the grasslands results in light soil that is carried away by strong winds to create the dust bowl. Circumstances which cause the Dust Bowl of the 1930s:
high windslight soiltoo much ploughing of grasslandsThus, options A, B and C are the correct options.
What caused the Dust Bowl in the 1930s?The 1930s saw the Dust Bowl, a time of very destructive dust storms that severely harmed the ecosystem and agriculture of the American and Canadian plains. The phenomena were brought on by a confluence of natural and artificial elements. With the outset of the drought in 1931, crops started to fail, exposing the bare, over-ploughed fields.
The earth started to drift away when there were no prairie grasses to anchor it. Massive dust storms and economic ruin were caused by eroding soil, especially in the Southern Plains. Although to many people the drought seemed to go on forever, it eventually ended.
Learn more about the Dust Bowl, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29622188
#SPJ2
What was the compromise of 1850?
Answer:
The Compromise of 1850 was a package of five separate bills passed by the United States Congress in September 1850 that defused a political confrontation between slave and free states on the status of territories acquired in the Mexican–American War.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Compromise of 1850 was a package of five separate bills passed by the United States Congress in September 1850.
Explanation:
Explain how Chamberlain's speech reflects the policy of appeasement and describe how Chamberlain's prediction proved to be inaccurate
Chamberlain's speech is reflective of the policy of appeasement, showing his attempt to prevent war by making concessions to Germany. However, his prediction of peace proved to be wrong when Hitler launched World War II by invading Poland, demonstrating that appeasement was not effective in dissuading aggressive expansionist policies.
Explanation:Neville Chamberlain's speech following the Munich Agreement, famously referred to as his 'peace for our time' speech, is widely understood as forwarding the policy of appeasement. This policy was a diplomatic approach where concessions were given to another country in hopes of preventing war. Chamberlain's actions revealed a desperate attempt to maintain peace with Germany, avoiding a war by placating Hitler's demands.
However, Chamberlain's prediction of achieving 'peace in our time' through these actions proved to be inaccurate. Just under a year after the Munich Agreement, Hitler invaded Poland, thus beginning World War II. This showed that the policy of appeasement was ineffective in deterring Hitler's aggressive expansionist policies.
Learn more about Chamberlain's appeasement policy here:https://brainly.com/question/12457329
#SPJ3
Why is the taking of Fort Ticonderoga ultimately important to the early part of the Revolutionary War? Question 4 options: It ends the British threat to Canada The cannon, from the fort, were moved overland to Boston and used to force the British to evacuate Boston. It allows the American militia forces to destroy the fort and render it unusable
The cannon, from the fort, were moved overland to Boston and used to force the British to evacuate Boston.
Explanation:
During the American Revolutionary War, the fortress was attacked again in May 1775, when the Green Mountain Boys and the militias of other states under the command of Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold captured the fort in a surprise attack. The captured cannons were transferred to Boston, where their deployment forced the British to leave the city in March 1776 after a months-long siege of Boston. The Americans held the fort until June 1777, when British forces under General John Burgoyne reconquered the fort and threatened members of the Continental Army.Learn more on Fort Ticonderoga on
https://brainly.com/question/371939
https://brainly.com/question/1832902
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
The cannon, from the fort, were moved overland to Boston and used to force the British to evacuate Boston.
Explanation:
Which state reaches the furthest west?
OA) Oklahoma
OB) New Mexico
C) Utah
OD) Wyoming
Which of the following was not a part of the Niagara Movement's platform?
Womens suffarge was not a part of the Niagara Movement's platform
What was the Niagara Movement's platform
The Niagara Movement, established in 1905 by African American activists including W.E.B. Du Bois, was a pioneering civil rights organization advocating for full equality and civil rights for African Americans.
Their platform emphasized equal rights, an end to racial segregation, economic opportunities, protest against discrimination, education, leadership development, and seeking legal justice.
This movement served as a precursor to the establishment of the NAACP, laying the foundation for ongoing efforts to combat racial discrimination and promote civil rights for African Americans in the United States.
Question
Which of the following was not a part of the Niagara Movement's platform?
Women suffrage
Civil rights movement
NAACP
As the Umayyad Dynasty expanded their control of North Africa and the Iberian peninsula, the Arabic language also spread. What was one reason for the spread of Arabic along with the spread of Islam?
Answer:
Umayyad dynasty controlled a large empire known as the Arabic empire. Their extending control over the vast areas which controlled the Iberian peninsula and North Africa influenced the culture and language of these region. The centralized administer system and Arabic as the official language have long-lasting impact over these regions. Although the spread of Arabs not always converted the whole population of the conquered land to adopt Islam, the language Arabic was always a medium to gain better opportunities.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Explain how members of the Congressare allocated for each state.
Final answer:
Members of the U.S. Congress are allocated based on two chambers: the Senate, where each state receives two senators, and the House of Representatives, where representation is based on population determined every ten years via the Census, with a fixed total of 435 representatives.
Explanation:
The allocation of members of Congress for each state is based on two different systems for the two chambers that make up Congress: the Senate and the House of Representatives. For the Senate, representation is straightforward; each state is allocated exactly two senators, making a total of 100 senators for the 50 states.
On the other hand, the House of Representatives is where the allocation gets more complex. House apportionment is strictly dependent on the population of the states. Every ten years, following a national Census, congressional apportionment is conducted using the equal proportions method to reallocate House seats. As a result, states with larger populations get more representatives, while every state is guaranteed at least one seat, even if its population is small.
Historically, the number of House members grew with the population but hit a cap of 435 members after the 1910 Census. This number can lead to shifts in the number of representatives among the states if population disparities change, as seen in the 1929 agreement. For example, after population increases observed in Southern and Western states like Texas, Florida, and California, additional representatives were allocated to these states whereas states like Pennsylvania, which experienced population decreases, saw a reduction in representatives.
Final answer:
Apportionment of House members for each state is based on population as per the U.S. Census data, with each state guaranteed at least one seat, and additional seats distributed using the equal proportions method. The House is comprised of a fixed number of 435 seats, and redistricting ensures fair representation as populations change over time.
Explanation:
Allocation of Congress Members for Each State
Members of Congress consist of Senators and members of the House of Representatives. While each state has two Senators, the allocation of House members to each state is determined by the process of apportionment, which is based on the state's population as established by the U.S. Census occurring every ten years. After the Census data is collected, redistricting occurs, where state legislators redraw the district lines to ensure an equal number of people within each district. This process is necessary to maintain fair representation, following the principle of "one person, one vote." Despite population changes over time, the total number of seats in the House of Representatives is fixed at 435, as established by the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929.
As per the Constitution, every state is guaranteed at least one seat in the House, and additional seats are apportioned using the equal proportions method, a mathematical formula designed to minimize representation differences between states. For example, the 2020 Census readjusted the distribution of seats, which can lead to certain states gaining or losing seats depending on population shifts. In some cases, this has led to a practice known as gerrymandering, where district boundaries are manipulated to influence election results. However, such practices are often challenged under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
Why do you think President Roosevelt singled out the defense industry at this time?
Answer:
Roosevelt promised to help the United Kingdom fight Nazi Germany by giving them military supplies while the United States stayed out of the actual fighting. ... "The great arsenal of democracy" came to specifically refer to the industry of the U.S., as the primary supplier of material for the Allied war effort.
Explanation: :D
what reason was given for the 2003 US invasion in iraq
Answer:
The Iraqi government was in possession of incredibly threatening "weopons of mass destruction"
What if the U.S. had joined the League of Nations?
Answer:
Look below for answer...
Explanation:
Although US President Woodrow Wilson was an enthusiastic proponent of the League, the United States did not officially join the League of Nations due to opposition from isolationists in Congress.
What is the central idea of give me liberty or give me death speech
The central idea of Patrick Henry's 'Give me liberty or give me death' speech is the fundamental American value of liberty. It argued for the right of citizens to live freely, without undue government intrusion, and kickstarted the American Revolution against British rule.
Explanation:The central idea of the 'Give me liberty or give me death' speech, delivered by Patrick Henry in 1775, embodies the fundamental American value of liberty above all else. The speech focused on the desperate need for American colonies to fight against the diminishing liberties instigated by British rule. The idea asserted that life without liberty was not worth living and underscored the importance of fighting for their basic rights and freedoms, even at the cost of death.
The speech argues that government should not deprive people of their liberties and should not have unrestricted power over citizens' lives. This concept was a significant factor in the American colonies' decision to declare independence. Drawing on the ideas of British philosopher John Locke, who believed in natural rights, Patrick Henry emphasized that these rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, should not be denied by any ruler or government.
Learn more about Give me liberty or give me death speech here:https://brainly.com/question/32051701
#SPJ2
Enter the word you received when you completed the Andrew Jackson and Modern Political Parties activity.
Answer:
politics
Make sure to not capitalize
The word politics is the word that a person received when he completed the Andrew Jackson and Modern Political Parties activity.
What is the politics?Politics is the set of activities associated with group decision-making or other forms of domination among individuals, such as resource distribution or status. Political science is the social sciences branch that studies politicians.
Political activity can be valuable in and of itself because it socializes and educates citizens, and popular membership can put powerful elites in check. Above all, citizens do not rule themselves unless they immediately start deciding on laws and policies.
Therefore, when a person completed the Andrew Jackson and Modern Political Parties activity, he received the word politics.
Learn more about the politics, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ5
what is the main reason why leaders created a Supreme Court
According to Creel, how did this war differ from all previous conflicts?
Answer:
George Creel was a mid-western journalist who was made the head of an independent agency of the United States known as Commission on Public Information which was formed to influence the public opinion in favor of the First World War. " How this war differs from all previous war" this topic was central to the propaganda used to influence public opinion. the War was portrayed as not only between army but ideals. The life of trenches was glorified, Veterans became heroes and the battle was considered to serve mankind.
World War I was distinct from previous conflicts due to its global scale, mechanized warfare, and trench warfare that resulted in high casualties and significant changes in national boundaries and global power dynamics.
Explanation:According to Creel, World War I differed from all previous conflicts in that it was the first truly global war that involved nations from nearly every continent. It was characterized by the use of mechanized and deadly weapons, such as tanks, airplanes, machine guns, barbed wire, and poison gas, stemming from the technological advances of the Industrial Revolution.
Moreover, WWI was a prolonged war that featured trench warfare and resulted in massive casualties, including millions of soldiers and civilians. The war brought about significant changes in national boundaries and influenced the world's power dynamics, with the hegemony shifting towards the Soviet Union and the United States.
What did Lee consider the one unifying purpose that would help the nation avoid further sectional conflict?
Lee consider the one unifying purpose that would help the nation avoid further sectional conflict is the unification thought
Explanation:
The term unification in the unification thought means that the people have the ideals ad values of unity and harmony among them so that they do not fight with others and if they have this feeling, there will be a solution to great problems in the world.
There should be no division among the people on the basis of social, political or economical and all should live together with each other. There should also be internal unity also in the thought system of the people.
Final answer:
Lee believed that fostering national unity was crucial to preventing further sectional conflict in the nation. The supremacy of the Constitution and maintaining the Union were emphasized during the Civil War, and Reconstruction, efforts focused on reunification.
Explanation:
Lee considered national unity as the one unifying purpose that would help the nation avoid further sectional conflict. Through various attempts by entities such as Crittenden proposing amendments to protect slavery and Webster's calls for unity, the overarching goal during the Civil War became maintaining the supremacy of the Constitution and the Union. Post-war efforts, as seen during Reconstruction under Lincoln, focused on quickly reuniting the country, demonstrating a persistent desire for reconciled national unity. The continual thread was the belief that through common ground, such as the land itself or shared endeavors, the nation could recover and overcome its divisions.
What happened to world war 1 veterans as a result of the depression
Answer:
There was a major effect on the veterans due to Great Depression.
Explanation:
World war 1 had caused major economic problems in number of countries. There were war debts, reparations imposed on countries leading to crisis and thus Great Depression.
After the World war 1, bonus was announced for the veterans as a reward for their service. But, when they returned home, they faced bad treatment. Veterans demanded for their lost wages. Congress even passed a law to fulfil the same but that was not given until 1945. Veterans had no money, no food, no jobs and in some cases no homes. They served for their country and were treated like this. They (called as Bonus Army after they returned from war) stayed in makeshift homes with their families. Soon, Gen MacArthur ordered an attack on them by tear gas, and with bayonets.
Answer:
their demand that bonuses be paid early was ignored
3 Why did Union Major Anderson take possession of Fort Sumter? Cite
primary source evidence to support your answer.
Union Major Anderson take possession of Fort Sumter to confederates bombarded the fort and wanted it to be surrendered.
Explanation:
Union Major Anderson was an Army officer in the army of United States of America. He was the Union commander in the first battle of the American civil war.
This was fought at the fort Sumter in the year of 1961. This started off at the fort because the confederate had bombarded the fort and they wanted the fort to be surrendered. It's surrendering led to the start of the civil war.
Union Major Anderson took possession of Fort Sumter to maintain federal control after South Carolina's secession. The situation escalated when attempt to resupply the fort led to Confederate forces opening fire, marking the start of the Civil War. Major Anderson's and Lincoln's actions illustrated the Union's determination to preserve its sovereignty.
Explanation:Union Major Anderson took possession of Fort Sumter due to escalating tensions following South Carolina's secession from the Union. After the secession, Major Robert Anderson moved his forces from Fort Moultrie to the more defensible Fort Sumter to ensure federal control over this strategic location. As supplies began to dwindle and South Carolina demanded the fort's surrender, President Lincoln faced a dilemma. He decided to resupply the fort in a non-aggressive manner, sending an unarmed merchant ship, the Star of the West, with reinforcements and supplies.
However, South Carolina militia opened fire on the ship, forcing it to retreat. This incident heightened tensions, leading to Confederate forces, under General P.G.T. Beauregard, opening fire on Fort Sumter on April 12, 1861, marking the beginning of the Civil War. Lincoln's attempt to resupply Fort Sumter and Anderson's refusal to surrender the fort were pivotal actions demonstrating the federal government's commitment to maintaining its territories and resisting the secessionist movement.
If Country I has an industrialized economy and Country II is a developing country, which group of workers would suffer the GREATEST loss if the two countries entered into a free trade agreement?
A Highly skilled workers in Country I would suffer the greatest loss due to outsourcing of their jobs to Country II.
B Highly skilled workers in Country II would suffer the greatest loss due to outsourcing of their jobs to Country I.
C Unskilled workers in Country I would suffer the greatest loss due to increased competition from unskilled workers in Country II.
D Unskilled workers in Country II would suffer the greatest loss due to increased competition from unskilled workers in Country I.
Unskilled workers in Country I would suffer the greatest loss due to increased competition from unskilled workers in Country II.
Explanation:
Country I is an industrialized country, thus a developed country. That means that the country's labor force, in general, is highly skilled. There are unskilled workers as well though, and they occupy the working positions that don't require any specific skills. The wages in a country like this would be relatively high, and when compared to a developing country, it is very probable that the unskilled workers from the industrialized country earn more than the skilled workers of the developing country.
If the the Country I and Country II open up to each other, especially in economic manner, there will be lot of positives, but also some negatives. The main negative would be that the unskilled workers from country one will most probably lose their jobs. The reason for that will that the unskilled workers from Country II are able to perform the same job, but they require much smaller wages, so naturally the business owners would prefer to hire them.
There are many examples like this around the world, with some being:
Eastern Europeans in Western EuropeMexicans in the United StatesVenezuelans in ColombiaCentral Asians in RussiaLearn more about developed country https://brainly.com/question/14089261#
#learnwithBrainly
In washington’s “farewell address,” he warned about potential dangers facing the future of the untied states. what are some of the dangers
George Washinton (1732-1799) was the first American president, governing for two consecutive terms between 1789 and 1796 and refusing a third term.
The dangers Washington warned Americans about were 1) excessive political party spirit and 2) geographical distinctions.
He praises the spirit of one nation that should be cultivated in order for the U.S. to remain a free nation. For him, the Union was a victory American people should fight to keep.
Accordingly to the defense of the Union, Washington warned Americans against exaggerated regional identities. For him, the national victory over British authoritarianism should always be remembered as a collective victory.
The Maya people in this country invented the chocolate bar and used the concept of zero for the first time. What country do the Maya people belong to?
El Salvador
Costa Rica
Guatemala
Ecuador
Maya people belong to Guatemala
Explanation:
Guatemala is the domain to volcanoes, tropical forests, and traditional Mayans, a Central American nation south of Mexico.
In southern Mexico, Guatemala and northern Belize, the Mayan Mesoamerican Indians live on almost continuous territories. More than five million people, many of whom were multicultural, spoke Mayan in Spanish in the early 21st century.
The written story of the Mayan mentions that chocolate beverages are used in religious festivals and in order to complete important trades.
In Ancient Egypt around 3 B.C the first documented zero was recorded. The Mayans spontaneously invented it about 4 A.D. This was subsequently built in India in the mid-fifth century and expanded to Cambodia at the end of the seventh century.
Answer:
Guatemala
Explanation:
i need to know what's flat money authority? idek what to answer- i can't get over with bts' performance in mma last night hElP :/
Answer:
*fiat money
Fiat money is government-issued currency that is not backed by a physical commodity, such as gold or silver, but rather by the government that issued it. The value of fiat money is derived from the relationship between supply and demand and the stability of the issuing government, rather than the worth of a commodity backing it as is the case for commodity money. Most modern paper currencies are fiat currencies, including the U.S. dollar, the euro and other major global currencies.
Explanation:
does anyone know the answer ?
Answer:
ju·ris·dic·tion - the official power to make legal decisions and judgments.
Explanation:
A and C are definitely wrong. I'm not aware exactly of your curriculum, but it looks to me like B is most likely the correct choice.
What did the Sons of Liberty do?
Answer:
the Sons of Liberty was a secret revolutionary organization that was created in the Thirteen American colonies Advance the rights of the European colonists and to fight taxation by the British government. it played a major role in most colonies in battling the Stamp Act in 1765
Final answer:
The Sons of Liberty were a group of colonial merchants, artisans, and shopkeepers who protested against British policies like the Stamp Act and the Intolerable Acts, used violent and extralegal methods, and successfully used propaganda to gain support for their cause.
Explanation:
The Sons of Liberty played a crucial role in resisting British policy and stirring public opposition to British rule during the years leading up to the American Revolution. Forming in Boston during the summer of 1765, they were a group of artisans, shopkeepers, and merchants who adopted extralegal means of protest against the policies imposed by the British government, such as the Stamp Act and the Intolerable Acts. For instance, the Sons of Liberty burned effigies of stamp collectors and threatened violent retaliation against anyone who bought imported goods or used stamped paper. They were adept at using propaganda to sway public opinion, as shown by Paul Revere's sensationalized engraving of the 1770 Boston Massacre, which depicted the British soldiers as ruthless and helped galvanize colonial resistance.