1. How did the sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s affect American society? (1 point)
Unselected answer (0 pts) Teenage marriages increased.
Incorrect Answer (0 pts) Sexually transmitted diseases declined.
Unselected answer (1 pt) Individuals talked openly about sex.
Unselected answer (0 pts) Divorce rates decreased.
0 /1 point,

Chinese communism had the idea that the rural peasants formed the most important part of the revolution. On the other side, the European communism, for example in the USSR, had the belief that the backbone of the revolution were the urban workers. In the early years of Chinese communism put less emphasis on industry than European communism. With the passing of time the ideas of the Chinese communism evolved and changed.

The Pilgrims and Puritans settled in North America to seek religious freedom and create communities based on Calvinist beliefs, separate from the Church of England.

Many of the original English colonists, such as the Pilgrims and the Puritans, were religious separatists seeking to establish colonies in North America. They were motivated by a desire to practice their religion freely and to create communities based on their Calvinist beliefs, which differed from the practices of the Church of England. The Puritans aimed to 'purify' the Church from what they saw as Catholic elements, whereas the Pilgrims, who were Separatists, sought a complete break from the Church. The Pilgrims initially migrated to the Dutch Republic in search of religious freedom but decided to move to North America to maintain their English identity and to escape potential conflicts in Europe. Hence, the most accurate answer would be they were seeking religious freedom and financial opportunities.

The answer is B. A contract in which land was granted to the peasants in exchange for military service to the nobles. :}

I took this quiz before and passed it! :}

Answer:

D. a contract in which land was granted to the peasants in exchange for military service to the nobles.

Explanation:

i am taking the test rn in study island :)

-Chilly

I think the answer is A. I am not 100% positive though.

Final answer:

The violence of abolitionist protests was NOT a significant motivation for the Emancipation Proclamation, which was driven by military necessity and the need to prevent European support for the Confederacy.

Explanation:

The factor that was NOT a significant motivation for the Emancipation Proclamation was D. violence of abolitionist protests. The primary motivations included military advantage, as freeing slaves would cripple the South's ability to fight and open up recruitment for African American soldiers. Diplomacy played a role, as gaining the goodwill of European nations, especially the anti-slavery British public, would make the Union's cause stronger and undercut Confederate hopes for international recognition. However, the violence of abolitionist protests was not a significant part of the decision, as seen in the other factors discussed.

Answer:

They realized Germany's practice of persecuting the Jews was going against God's teachings.

They were open to His leading and were willing to do the Lord's work.

Explanation:

The United States supported a revolution in Panama at the start of the 20th century to facilitate the construction of the Panama Canal for military and trade advantages. In return, the US provided financial support to the new country, Panama.

The United States supported a revolution in Panama at the turn of the 20th century primarily to establish a canal across Central America. This strategic move was influenced by several reasons. First, there were the military advantages associated with the empire, primarily built around the guidance provided by Mahan's 'The Influence of Seapower upon History'. Second, there were international trade considerations that would benefit from a direct water route from Atlantic to Pacific. Initially, the US negotiated with Colombia, which controlled Panama at the time. However, the Colombian Senate rejected the treaty which led the US to support a Panamanian uprising against Colombia.

Indeed, President Theodore Roosevelt sent American warships to the coast of Colombia, under the pretense of practice maneuvers during the progression of the Panamanian revolution. These warships obstructed Colombia from sending additional troops in the region, thereby playing a crucial part in the successful Panama revolution. Following the successful revolution, Panama became an American protectorate, and in return for their help, the United States offered them $10 million and additional $250,000 annual rental fee for the land across Panama to construct the canal. The US accomplished the strategic goals of increasing military power and international trade, as the new Panama Canal provided a quicker route for shipping.

https://brainly.com/question/4954044

#SPJ3

Europeans needed places to use the new technologies they had developed can be described as the motivation for European countries establishing empires in the 19th century. Option C is the correct answer.

During the 19th century, Europe experienced the Industrial Revolution, which led to advancements in technology, transportation, and manufacturing. European countries sought new markets and resources to sustain their growing industries and economies. Option C is the correct answer.

Establishing empires in Africa and Asia provided them with access to raw materials, such as rubber, cotton, and minerals, which were crucial for their industries. Additionally, European countries wanted to secure new markets for their manufactured goods. By colonizing territories in Africa and Asia, they could expand their trade networks and create a demand for their products in these regions.

Learn more about Motivation here:

https://brainly.com/question/17762843

#SPJ2

The complete question is, "Which of the following describes a motivation for European countries establishing empires in the 19th century?

a. Europeans believed they were morally superior to the peoples of Africa and Asia.

b. Europeans wanted to leave Europe and relocate to African and Asian countries.

c. Europeans needed places to use the new technologies they had developed.

d. Europeans hoped to spread Enlightenment ideas, including liberal democracy."

Answer

The U.S president refuses to intervene in mexico oil nationalization

Explanation

A good neighbor is someone who is nice and approachable.

Good neighbor policy was a United States foreign doctrine which was designed for the purposes of improving relations with the Latin America. This was after the United States had abandoned an aggressive and militaristic foreign policy approach to Latin America.  The United state shown a successful adherence to the good neighbor policy when the Mexico nationalized all petroleum. This was  In accordance with Article 27 of the Constitution of 1917, when President Lazaro Cardenas declared that all mineral and oil reserves found within Mexico belong to the nation. And by this the U.S president refuses to intervene in mexico oil nationalization.

SOS:

The geographic location of Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and Somalia, puts them close to the Middle East—an important source of oil. They are also near the shipping lanes of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Additionally, countries on the Horn of Africa are strategically located between South Asia and Europe.

Hope this helps!

Britain and France opposed Wilson's peace plan because they sought to secure reparations and weaken Germany to prevent future conflicts, which conflicted with the idealistic principles of Wilson's Fourteen Points.

After World War I, Britain and France were largely opposed to President Wilson's peace plan because it did not align with their interests in punishing Germany and securing reparations for the destruction caused by the war. While President Wilson's Fourteen Points aimed for a more idealistic, fair peace based on self-determination and without annexations or reparations, Britain and France had suffered enormous casualties and damages that fueled their desire for retribution and compensation. They were more interested in ensuring their own security and economic recovery, which involved inflicting harsh penalties on Germany to weaken it and to prevent future aggression.

Britain and France were also invested in expanding their colonial territories and securing their positions in the post-war world, which conflicted with some aspects of Wilson's plan for peace and self-determination. The Treaty of Versailles, which formally ended the war, incorporated the establishment of the League of Nations—one of Wilson's points—but imposed severe territorial losses, military restrictions, and reparations on Germany, which Wilson had sought to avoid. Britain and France's stance was also heavily influenced by domestic pressures and the economic dependence on the United States during the war.

Final answer:

Britain and France opposed President Wilson's peace plan primarily because it did not match their desires for reparations, territorial gains, and security against German aggression. Their own interests, economic and geopolitical, took precedence over Wilson's idealistic proposals, resulting in the Treaty of Versailles, which barely reflected the Fourteen Points.

Explanation:

Main Reasons Britain and France Opposed Wilson's Peace Plan

After World War I, Britain and France mainly opposed President Wilson’s peace plan because the plan did not align with their interests or address their demands for reparation and security against future German aggression. They were intent on making Germany pay for the war and ensuring that Germany could not rise to threaten them again. The Allied leaders held a deep resentment towards Germany and sought to cripple its power, both economically and militarily, contrary to Wilson's idealistic vision of “peace without victory”.

Wilson's Fourteen Points aimed at establishing a foundation for lasting peace, promoting self-determination, and preventing future conflicts. However, the harsh realities and the severe destruction caused by the war led Britain and France to prioritize their national interests over idealistic principles. They demanded heavy reparations, territorial gains, and a “war guilt clause” to be imposed on Germany, which contradicted Wilson’s more lenient proposals.

Moreover, the Allied leaders had concerns about their own territorial ambitions and the strategic value of former German colonies and territories in the Middle East. Their economic interests and geopolitical strategies ultimately shaped the Treaty of Versailles, which bore little resemblance to Wilson's original proposals. In essence, Britain and France's hesitance to support President Wilson’s peace plan was driven by a mix of post-war vindictiveness, desire for security, and colonial ambitions, all of which overshadowed the American president's more idealistic and conciliatory approach.

The best answer here is tenant farmers. They differed from sharecroppers in that tenant farmers actually owned some private property, though that was limited to farming implements. Sharecroppers, on the other hand, only had their labor to give. Neither, however, had ultimate rights to the land on which they worked, since it was owned by wealthy, often elite Southerners.

Answer:

wages, hours, and working conditions

Explanation:

The industrialization in the world quickly led to the formation of a working class consisting of factory workers who had to labor for more than 8 hours, and no labor rights were present. In many cases, they were overloaded with more than 12 hrs working hours, and children were also being employed.

Conditions of low security and safety standards resulted in health problems as a result of intensive work. The wages only helped them survive.

The issues that occurred were recurrent and led to the formation of the first so-called syndicates that frequently turned into strikes for setting demands of social revindication.

Answer:

Passed in 1973 over the veto of President Richard Nixon, the War Powers Resolution (its official name) blocks presidents from continuing the pursuance of a war without Congress's approval.  Congress must be notified within 48 hours if troops are deployed, and troops cannot remained deployed beyond 60 days without approval from Congress.

The US Constitution leaves some tension in place between the legislative and executive branch when it comes to the country's involvement in war.  Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war.  But Article II names the President the Commander-in-Chief, and presidents frequently have understood that role as containing the authority to deploy US forces without first getting congressional approval.  The War Powers Act requires the President to notify Congress of troop deployments and limits the length of time troops can be deployed without Congressional approval.

the answer is B. imposed an embargo on shipping war goods and petroleum products to Japan.