2. The radius or diameter of a circle is given. Find the remaining measure.
a) d = 9 m
b)r = 28.5 yd

Answer:

FALSE. If he is risk-loving, he will rather bet $1,000 rather than $10.

Step-by-step explanation:

FALSE.

As Paul is risk-loving, he will take more risk, even if there is no more chances of winning if he bets $10 or $1,000. He will focus on the probability of winnings rather than the expected losses.

In this case, the probabilities are the same independently of the amount that Paul bets.

The 95% confidence interval for the population mean based on a sample of 100 with mean 16 and population standard deviation 3 is (15.412, 16.588). For a margin of error not exceeding 0.5, a sample size of 139 is needed.

To compute the 95% confidence interval for the population mean μ, we use the formula for a confidence interval which is ȳ ± Z*(σ/√n), where ȳ is the sample mean, σ is the population standard deviation, n is the sample size, and Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (for a 95% confidence interval, Z = 1.96).

Plugging the given values into the formula, we get 16 ± 1.96*(3/√100), which simplifies to 16 ± 0.588. Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the population mean μ is (15.412, 16.588).

For the second part of the question, the formula used to find the sample size needed for a certain margin of error (E) at a certain confidence level is n = (Zσ/E)^2. Substituting the given values into this formula, we get n = (1.96*3/0.5)^2 which is equal to 138.384. Since we can't have a fraction of a sample, we round this up to the nearest whole number, so we would need a sample size of 139 to estimate the population mean μ with a margin of error not exceeding 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval.

https://brainly.com/question/32005809

#SPJ12

To compute a 95% confidence interval for the population mean μ, we can use the formula: Confidence Interval = Sample Mean ± (Z * σ/√n). The 95% confidence interval for the population mean μ is (15.412, 16.588). To estimate the sample size needed to keep the margin of error within 0.5 with a 95% confidence level, we can use the formula: n = (Z^2 * σ^2) / (E^2). We need a sample size of at least 24 to estimate the population mean μ with a margin of error not exceeding 0.5, with a 95% confidence level.

To compute a 95% confidence interval for the population mean μ, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = Sample Mean ± (Z * σ/√n)

Where Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level, σ is the population standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

For this problem:

Confidence Interval = 16 ± (1.96 * 3/√100)

Simplifying, we get:

Confidence Interval = 16 ± 0.588

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the population mean μ is (15.412, 16.588).

To estimate the sample size needed to keep the margin of error within 0.5 with a 95% confidence level, we can use the formula:

n = (Z^2 * σ^2) / (E^2)

Where Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level, σ is the population standard deviation, and E is the maximum acceptable margin of error.

For this problem:

n = (1.96^2 * 3^2) / (0.5^2)

Simplifying, we get:

n = 23.532

Therefore, we need a sample size of at least 24 to estimate the population mean μ with a margin of error not exceeding 0.5, with a 95% confidence level.

https://brainly.com/question/34700241

#SPJ2

Answer:

cluster sample

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

295

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 410 x .72=295.2

you can not have .2 of a person, so you must round. Normally the question states what to round to, whether up or down, but generally .2 rounds down so: 295

Final answer:

295 students voted for Ben.

Explanation:

To calculate how many students voted for Ben in the class president election, we need to use the percentage of votes he received. Ben received 72% of the total votes from a class of 410 students.

First, convert the percentage to a decimal by dividing by 100:

72% = 72 ÷ 100 = 0.72

Then, multiply this decimal by the total number of students to find out how many voted for Ben:

Number of votes for Ben = 0.72 × 410

Now, we calculate the multiplication:

Number of votes for Ben = 295.2

Since we can't have a fraction of a vote, we'll round down to the nearest whole number. Thus, 295 students voted for Ben.

Answer:

  (a)  412 ft

  (b)  276 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the attached diagram.

(a) The internal angle of triangle RBT at B is 90° -10° = 80°. Since we know lengths RB and BT, we can find the length RT using the law of cosines:

  RT² = RB² +BT² -2·RB·BT·cos(80°) = 190² +400² -2·190·400·cos(80°)

  RT² ≈ 169,705.477

  RT ≈ √169,705.477 ≈ 411.95

The guy wire to the hillside should be about 412 feet long.

__

(b) The Pythagorean theorem can be used to find the shorter wire length.

  LM² = LB² +MB²

  LM = √(190² +200²) = √76,100

  LM ≈ 275.86

The guy wire to the flat side should be about 276 feet long.

Answer: I think it’s B and D on eduinuity 2021

Step-by-step explanation:

The required 5m²2n² is the greatest common factor of (b) 5m⁴n₃ and (d) 15m²n².

The greatest common factor (GCF) is the largest positive integer that divides two or more numbers without leaving a remainder. In other words, it is the largest number that is a factor of all the given numbers.

For example, the GCF of 12 and 18 is 6, because 6 is the largest positive integer that divides both 12 and 18 without leaving a remainder.

here,
The terms that could have the greatest common factor of 5m²n² are:
5m⁴n₃, since 5m²n² is a factor of both 5m⁴n³ and 5m²n².
15m²n², since 5m²n² is a factor of both 15m²n² and 5m²2n².

Therefore, the correct options are (b) 5m⁴n₃ and (d) 15m²n².

Learn more about the greatest common factors here: https://brainly.com/question/11221202
#SPJ5

The complete question is given in the attachment below,

Answer:

Please see attachment

Question:

The options are;

(a) (9 - 2s1, 3 + 3s1, s1)

solution

not a solution

(b) (-4 - 5s1, s1,  -(3 + s1)/2)

solution

not a solution

(c) (11 + 10s1, -3 - 2s1, s1)

solution

not a solution

(d) ((6 - 4s1)/3, s1, -(7 - s1)/4)

solution

not a solution

Answer:

The options that form a solution of the given system are;

(b) and (c)

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have

3·x₁ + 8·x₂ − 14·x₃ = 9

x₁ + 3·x₂ − 4·x₃ = 1

(a) (9 - 2·s₁, 3 + 3·s₁,s₁)

3·(9 - 2·s₁) + 8·(3 + 3·s₁) − 14·s₁ = 4s₁+51

Not a solution

(b) (-4 - 5s₁, s₁, -(3 + s1)/2)

3·(-4 - 5s₁) + 8·(s₁) − 14·-(3 + s1)/2 = 9

(-4 - 5s₁) + 3·(s₁) − 4·-(3 + s1)/2 = 2

Solution

(c) (11 + 10s₁, -3 - 2s₁, s₁ )

3·(11 + 10s₁) + 8·(-3 - 2s₁) − 14·s₁  = 9

(11 + 10s₁) + 3·(-3 - 2s₁) − 4·s₁ = 2

Solution

(d) ((6 - 4s1)/3, s1, -(7 - s1)/4)

3·(6 - 4s1)/3+ 8·s1− 14·-(7 - s1)/4 = 0.5s₁ +30.5  

Not a solution

Answer:

[tex]t=\frac{423-433}{\frac{2.6}{\sqrt{15}}}=-14.896[/tex]    

[tex]df=n-1=15-1=14[/tex]  

We need to find in the t distribution with df=14 a value who accumulates 0.1 of the area in the left and we got [tex]t_{crit}= -1.345[/tex].

Since our calculated value for the statistic is is so much lower than the critical value we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly less than 433 and then the machine is underfilling.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given

[tex]\bar X=423[/tex] represent the sample mean

[tex]s=26[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation

[tex]n=15[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =433[/tex] represent the value that we want to test

[tex]\alpha=0.1[/tex] represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value for the test

System of hypothesis

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true mean is less than 433 (underfilling), the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \geq 433[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu < 433[/tex]  

The statistic is:

[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]  (1)  

Calculate the statistic

[tex]t=\frac{423-433}{\frac{2.6}{\sqrt{15}}}=-14.896[/tex]    

Decision rule

The degrees of freedom are:

[tex]df=n-1=15-1=14[/tex]  

We need to find in the t distribution with df=14 a value who accumulates 0.1 of the area in the left and we got [tex]t_{crit}= -1.345[/tex]

Since our calculated value for the statistic is is so much lower than the critical value we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly less than 433 and then the machine is underfilling.

Answer:

i believe that the answer is A.) but im not 100% sure, im about  65% sure

Step-by-step explanation:

Final answer:

Normal distribution characterizes variables like the number of ants per acre, and the Central Limit Theorem helps understand the distribution of sample means. Allele frequencies are calculated by multiplying the number of homozygote ants by two and then dividing by the total number of alleles.

Explanation:

When discussing the number of ants per acre in a forest, you're dealing with a normal distribution, which is a probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean. With a known mean (μ) of 45,289 and a standard deviation (σ) of 12,340, if we let X represent the number of ants in a randomly selected acre, we can make various probabilistic predictions.

The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) applies when considering the sampling distribution of the sample mean. For example, if we have a population with a mean (μ) of 50 and standard deviation (σ) of 4, and take 100 samples each of size 40, the CLT tells us that the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normally distributed, centered around the population mean (μ), and with a standard deviation equal to the population standard deviation (σ) divided by the square root of the sample size (n). This is because, as per the law of large numbers, the sample means tend to get closer to the population mean as the sample size increases.

When calculating allele frequencies, it's essential to multiply the number of homozygote ants by 2 (as each ant has two alleles) to obtain the number of that allele in the population. The allele frequency is then the number of a specific allele divided by the total number of alleles.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there,

To get started, recall the area of a bound circle formula:

[tex]A = \pi r^{2}[/tex]    where r is radius of the circle. However, Juan used an approximate value of π, 3.14. So for our purposes, the formula becomes:

[tex]A=[/tex] [tex](3.14)r^{2}[/tex]

Juan measured the circle's diameter, so we can find radius from diameter first. Radius is simply twice the length of the diameter; from one circle endpoint to the center, to the endpoint across, making a straight line:

[tex]d=2r[/tex] ⇒ [tex]r=\frac{d}{2} = \frac{5 \ cm}{2} = 2.5 \ cm[/tex]

Now plug in to obtain area:

[tex]A = (3.14)(2.5 cm)^{2} =19.625 \ cm^{2}[/tex]

The area is 19.265 centimetres squared.

Cross-sections are the area shapes when you cut through a 3D volume; if you cut through a pipe perpendicular to where it flows, you can see it is a circle! If you cut straight through a cube, it would be a square, etc.

If you liked this solution, hit Thanks or give a Rating!

thanks,

Answer:

the term is 2/3(6)n-1

Step-by-step explanation:

Common ratio, r= 6

3rd term=24

Finding first term=

24=a 6^{2}  

24=36a

a=24/36

a=2/3

Answer:

F (x) = -3x+5x^2+8 has complex roots.

Step-by-step explanation:

number of roots?

ok.

f(x) =   5xx - 3x + 8  =   5xx + 5x  - 8x  + 8   ( I was guessing what numbers would sum to -3)

nope.

ok try discriminant:    (-3)^2 - 4*5 * 8 =   9 - 160  < 0

2 complex roots

Answer:

its answer C

Step-by-step explanation:

x² - 12x + 4x + 48

Answer:

The upper limit for population proportion is 0.3666

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

Sample size, n = 219

Number of people who have ability to speak a language other than English, x = 63

[tex]\hat{p} = \dfrac{x}{n} = \dfrac{63}{219} = 0.2877[/tex]

99% Confidence interval:

[tex]\hat{p}\pm z_{stat}\sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}}[/tex]

[tex]z_{critical}\text{ at}~\alpha_{0.05} = 2.58[/tex]

Putting the values, we get:

[tex] 0.2877\pm 2.58(\sqrt{\dfrac{ 0.2877(1- 0.2877)}{219}})\\\\ = 0.2877\pm 0.0789\\\\=(0.2088,0.3666)[/tex]

is the required 99% confidence interval for population proportion.

Thus, the upper limit for population proportion is 0.3666

Answer:

The upper limit of the 99% confidence interval for the population proportion based on these statistics is 0.3665.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that of the 219 white GSS 2008 respondents in their 20's, 63 of them claim the ability to speak a language other than English.

So, the sample proportion is : [tex]\hat p[/tex]  = X/n = 63/219

Firstly, the pivotal quantity for 99% confidence interval for the population proportion  is given by;

     P.Q. =  [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\hat p[/tex] = sample proportion = [tex]\frac{63}{219}[/tex]

           n = sample of respondents = 219

           p = population proportion

Here for constructing 99% confidence interval we have used One-sample z proportion statistics.

So, 99% confidence interval for the population​ proportion, p is ;

P(-2.5758 < N(0,1) < 2.5758) = 0.99  {As the critical value of z at

                        0.5% level of significance are -2.5758 & 2.5758}

P(-2.5758 < [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] < 2.5758) = 0.99

P( [tex]-2.5758 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] < [tex]{\hat p-p}[/tex] < [tex]2.5758 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] ) = 0.99

P( [tex]\hat p-2.5758 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] < p < [tex]\hat p+2.5758 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] ) = 0.99

99% confidence interval for p = [ [tex]\hat p-2.5758 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] , [tex]\hat p+2.5758 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex]]

   = [ [tex]\frac{63}{219} -2.5758 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\frac{63}{219}(1-\frac{63}{219})}{219} } }[/tex] , [tex]\frac{63}{219} +2.5758 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\frac{63}{219}(1-\frac{63}{219})}{219} } }[/tex] ]

   = [0.2089 , 0.3665]

Therefore, 99% confidence interval for the population proportion based on these statistics is [0.2089 , 0.3665].

Hence, the upper limit of the population proportion based on these statistics is 0.3665.

Answer:

A.

Its the simplkified version of the question and they both have the same out come which is 22.4

The equivalent expression for 10√5 is √500.

An equivalent expression is an expression that has the same value but does not look the same. When you simplify an expression, you're basically trying to write it in the simplest way possible.

For the given situation,

The expression is 10√5.

If a square number lies inside the square root, then we write that number outside the square root. So,

⇒ [tex]10\sqrt{5}[/tex]

⇒ [tex]\sqrt{10^{2}(5) }[/tex]

⇒ [tex]\sqrt{(100)(5)}[/tex]

⇒ [tex]\sqrt{500}[/tex]

Hence we can conclude that the equivalent expression for 10√5 is √500.

Learn more about equivalent expression here

https://brainly.com/question/11326971

#SPJ2

Answer:

Being p1 the proportion for people of ages 36-50 and p2 the proportion for people of ages 21-35, the null and alternative hypothesis will be:

[tex]H_0: p_1-p_2=0\\\\H_a: p_1-p_2>0[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

A hypothesis test on the difference of proportions needs to be performed for this case.

We have two sample proportions and we want to test if the true population proportions differ from each other, usign the information given by the sample statistics.

The claim is that the proportion of people of ages 36-50 who own homes is significantly greater than the proportin of people age 21-35 who own homes.

The term "higher" will define the alternative hypothesis, that is the hypothesis that represents what is claimed. The null hypothesis always include the equal sign, and will state that both proportions do not differ.

Being p1 the proportion for people of ages 36-50 and p2 the proportion for people of ages 21-35, the null and alternative hypothesis will be:

[tex]H_0: p_1-p_2=0\\\\H_a: p_1-p_2>0[/tex]

The null hypothesis (H0) is that the proportion of homeowners ages 36-50 is equal to the proportion of homeowners ages 21-35 (H0: P1 = P2), and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the proportion of homeowners ages 36-50 is greater than that of ages 21-35 (Ha: P1 > P2).

To answer the question, the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) must be formulated based on the given data about homeownership across different age groups. In this research, the null hypothesis would state that the proportion of homeowners who are ages 36-50 is equal to the proportion of homeowners who are age 21-35. Mathematically, this can be represented as H0: P1 = P2.

The alternative hypothesis is what the researchers are trying to support, which is that the proportion of homeowners who are ages 36-50 is significantly greater than the proportion of homeowners who are age 21-35, represented as Ha: P1 > P2.

It is important to note that a hypothesis test will be used to determine if there is enough statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Answer:

97.73% of bags weigh more than 14.8 ounces.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the weight of potato chip bags filled by a machine at a packaging plant is normally distributed with a mean of 15.0 ounces and a standard deviation of 0.1 ounces.

Let X = weight of potato chip bags filled by a machine

So, X ~ N([tex]\mu=15.0,\sigma^{2} =0.1^{2}[/tex])

The z-score probability distribution for normal distribution is given by;

               Z = [tex]\frac{ X -\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean weight = 15.0 ounces

            [tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation = 0.1 ounces

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is away from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value (area) associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X.

So, percentage of bags that weigh more than 14.8 ounces is given by = P(X > 14.8 ounces)

  P(X > 14.8 ounces) = P( [tex]\frac{ X -\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] > [tex]\frac{14.8-15.0}{0.1}[/tex] ) = P(Z > -2) = P(Z < 2)

                                                                   = 0.9773 or 97.73%

Now, in the z table the P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] x) or P(Z < x) is given. So, the above probability is calculated by looking at the value of x = 2 in the z table which has an area of 0.9773.

Hence, 97.73% of bags weigh more than 14.8 ounces.

To find the percentage of bags weighing more than 14.8 ounces, we calculate the z-score for 14.8 ounces and use the normal distribution properties. A z-score of -2 corresponds to 2.28% of bags weighing less, so about 97.72% weigh more.

To determine what percentage of potato chip bags weigh more than 14.8 ounces when the mean weight is 15.0 ounces with a standard deviation of 0.1 ounces, we use the properties of the normal distribution. First, we calculate the z-score for 14.8 ounces:

Z = (X - μ) / σ = (14.8 - 15.0) / 0.1 = -2

The z-score tells us how many standard deviations away 14.8 ounces is from the mean. A z-score of -2 indicates that 14.8 ounces is 2 standard deviations below the mean. Using the z-score table or a calculator with normal distribution functions, we find the area to the left of z = -2. This area represents the percentage of bags weighing less than 14.8 ounces. Since we're interested in bags weighing more than 14.8 ounces, we subtract this value from 1 (or 100% if we're working with percentages).

For z = -2, the area to the left is approximately 0.0228 (or 2.28%). Therefore, the percentage of bags that weigh more than 14.8 ounces is about 100% - 2.28% = 97.72%.

Answer:

it's B) 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

So if Lisa scored less than 13 points then the answer has to lie in the intervals 1-12. You had 2 from intervals 1-6 and 5 from intervals 7-12 and you get 7

Answer:

4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

.8 is a fourth of 1.0

.20

.40

.60

.80

1.0

since there are five total numbers from that sequence, and .8 is the fourth, the simplest form it could go to is 4/5

The decimal number 0.8 as a fraction in the simplest form is 4/5.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a fraction simply refers to a numerical quantity (numeral) which is not expressed as a whole number. This ultimately implies that, a fraction is simply a part of a whole number.

In this exercise and scenario, we would convert the given decimal number into a fraction as follows;

0.8 = 8/10

By dividing both the numerator and denominator by 2, we have the following

8/10 = 4/5

Read more on fraction here: brainly.com/question/29367657

#SPJ6

The input units of the function f(t) are students multiplied by dollars per student.

The function[tex]\( f(t) = s(t) \cdot c(t) \)[/tex] represents the total cost to educate all the students in the elementary school t years after 2002. To determine the input units of this function, we need to analyze the units of its individual components.

s(t) is the number of students at time t. Its unit is "students."

c(t) is the cost to educate one student at time t. Its unit is "dollars per student."

When you multiply s(t)  by c(t), the units combine as follows:

[tex]\[ f(t) = s(t) \cdot c(t) = \text{"students"} \times \left(\frac{\text{"dollars"}}{\text{"student"}}\right) = \text{"students"} \cdot \text{"dollars per student"} \][/tex]

Therefore, the input units of the function f(t) are students multiplied by dollars per student.

Answer:

2^3 n^2 or 8n^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it's you have 10 dollars in one hour, and you want to find 1/10th of the dollar value, you'd multiply 1/10th, or 0.1 by the time as well. I converted it into minutes because we're finding a smaller unit of time than 1 hour.

60 min x 1/10 (or 60 min/10)=  6 minutes

I hope this helped!

6 minutes

If it takes 1 hour to earn $10, we convert that 1 hour to 60 minutes. Now we will divide 60 by 10, and that gives you 6. Therefore every 6 minutes you earn $1.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

The appropriate test statistic to test the claim that the mean for all car owners is less than 7.5 years is -1.997.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that 200 randomly selected car owners are surveyed, it is found that the mean length of time they plan to keep their car is 7.01 years, and the standard deviation is 3.47 years.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean for all car owners.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu \geq[/tex] 7.5 years     {means that the mean for all car owners is more than or equal to 7.5 years}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] < 7.5 years    {means that the mean for all car owners is less than 7.5 years}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample t test statistics as we don't know about population standard deviation;

                                T.S.  = [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean length of time = 7.01 years

            s = sample standard deviation = 3.47 years

            n = sample of cars = 200

So, test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{7.01-7.5}{\frac{3.47}{\sqrt{200} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_1_9_9[/tex]

                               =  -1.997

Hence, the appropriate test statistic to test the claim is -1.997.

Answer:

The standard deviation of the number of defective bulbs produced in an hour is 6.615

Step-by-step explanation:

Binomial probability distribution

Probability of exactly x sucesses on n repeated trials, with p probability.

The expected value of the binomial distribution is:

[tex]E(X) = np[/tex]

The standard deviation of the binomial distribution is:

[tex]\sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)}[/tex]

In this problem, we have that:

[tex]p = 0.0383, n = 1188[/tex]

What is the standard deviation of the number of defective bulbs produced in an hour

[tex]\sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)} = \sqrt{1188*0.0383*(1-0.0383)} = 6.615[/tex]

The standard deviation of the number of defective bulbs produced in an hour is 6.615

In the plot, I have graphed two functions on the same set of axes.

The first function, y(x) = e^(-0.5x) * sin(2x), is represented by a solid blue line with a 2-point line width.

The second function, y(x) = e^(-0.5x) * cos(2x), is shown with a dashed red line with a 3-point line width. Both functions are evaluated for 100 values of x ranging from 0 to 10.

The solid blue line represents the sine function, and the dashed red line represents the cosine function.

The legend, title, axis labels, and grid have been included to make the plot more informative and visually appealing.

In this plot, you can observe the oscillatory behavior of both functions as they decay exponentially with decreasing x.

The legend distinguishes between the two functions, and the grid helps in reading the values accurately.

The choice of line widths and colors enhances the visibility of the two functions, making it easier to compare their behavior over the specified range of x values.

for such more questions on functions

https://brainly.com/question/25638609

#SPJ3

The equation of a parabola that separates the blue points from the red points can be written in the form y = ax² + bx + c, where a, b, and c are constants. The specific coefficients will determine the direction, width, and position of the parabola.

To create an equation for a parabola that separates the blue and red points, we need more information about the specific characteristics desired for the parabola. The general form of the equation y = ax² + bx + c allows us to customize the parabola's shape. The coefficient a determines the direction of the parabola (opening upwards or downwards), while b and c influence its horizontal shift and vertical position.

For example, if we want a parabola that opens upwards with its vertex at the origin (0,0) and separates the points above from those below, the equation could be y = ax², where a is a positive constant. If a horizontal shift or translation is needed, adjustments to b and c can be made accordingly.

In summary, the equation of the parabola depends on the specific requirements for separating the blue and red points, and the general form y = ax² + bx + c provides the flexibility to tailor the parabola's characteristics to meet those needs.

Final answer:

The probability that all three students were born on Wednesday is 1/343.

Explanation:

To find the probability that all three students were born on Wednesday, we need to consider the total number of possible outcomes and the number of favorable outcomes.

There are 7 days in a week, so each student has a 1/7 chance of being born on Wednesday. Since the students are chosen at random and the choices are independent, we can multiply the probabilities together to find the probability that all three students were born on Wednesday:

P(all three born on Wednesday) = (1/7) * (1/7) * (1/7) = 1/343.