Answer:
B
Explanation:
Answer:
b. the continued fighting of General Kirby Smith’s Western Army
Excerpt from History of the Irish Language
Bethany Miller
- At one time, Irish Gaelic was the only language spoken in Ireland. It is one of the oldest written languages in existence, and it
was spoken in Ireland when others in Europe were still speaking and writing in Latin Various invaders of Ireland, beginning with
the Vikings in the eighth century, began to insert other words into spoken Irish The language soon began to evolve and change
After the Anglo-Norman invasion in 1169, the language had progressed through three stages, from what is known as "Old Irish
into "Middle Irish, and finally, to "Modern Irish," the language still spoken today. Unfortunately, the language began to
experience a downfall after this time, affecting the unique culture of Ireland.
Which major detail from paragraph 2 explains how the Irish language initially began to change?
A."The language progressed through three stages..."
B."It is one of the oldest written languages in existence."
C. The Vikings 'began to insert other words into spoken Irish
D."It was spoken_when others were still speaking and writing Latin."
Answer: it’s C
Explanation:
Dannnyyy hahahha
Which U.S. president approved the purchased of a french canal company and made the panama Canal's completion a top U.S. priority?
A. Theodore Roosevelt
B. Franklin Roosevelt
C. William McKinley
D. Woodrow Wilson
A. Theodore Roosevelt is the U.S. president who approved the purchased of a french canal company and made the panama Canal's completion a top U.S. priority.
Why were the British colonists upset about England's Navigation Acts?
A. The acts restricted trade between the colonists and other
European countries.
O
B. The acts forced colonists to pay taxes on all paper products.
O
C. The acts required colonists to provide housing to British soldiers.
O
D. The acts prevented colonists from settling west of the
Appalachian Mountains.
The acts restricted trade between the colonists and other European countries. The correct option is A.
The British colonists were upset about England's Navigation Acts primarily because these acts imposed significant restrictions on their trade with other European countries. The Navigation Acts were a series of laws passed by the British Parliament in the 17th and 18th centuries to regulate colonial trade and ensure that most of it would be conducted with England.
These acts required the colonists to use only British ships for their trade and to export certain goods, like tobacco and sugar, exclusively to England. Additionally, the acts placed tariffs and duties on goods imported from other countries, making it more expensive for the colonists to trade with non-British markets. These restrictions limited the colonists' economic opportunities and autonomy, leading to discontent and contributing to the growing tensions between the American colonies and the British government.
To know more about colonists , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/17745401
#SPJ2
ANSWER ASAP!!! 10 POINTS AND I"LL MARK YOU BRAINLIST AND GIVE YOU THANKS!!!!.............................Did the Constitution give Jefferson the right to purchase the Louisiana Territory?
Answer:
nope
Explanation:
Question 10
Jackson caused a stir among Washington's elite women when he --
Answer:
Jackson caused a stir among Washington's elite women when he defies Washington society matrons and appoints scandal-plagued John Eaton as his secretary of war. This is as a result of the accussation laid to John Eaton of having an affair with Margaret Peggy (once married to a US salior ) which later cumilated to marriage.
In addition to Margaret’s sullied reputation (having affairs with various Wasignton politicians), her passionate nature, flirtatiousness and outspokenness irked Washington’s society matrons at a time when those qualities were considered unseemly in women leading to the couple to be ostracized from the society after their marriage.
Explanation:
What were the main concerns of Jerry Falwell and his followers in the Moral Majority?
a.) They encourages people to return to traditional values.
b.) They were pleased with the growth of the federal government.
c.) They were strong supporters of Presidents Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford
d.) They supported the Equal Rights Amendment and the feminist movement.
Answer:
Explanation:
is a
The main concerns of Jerry Falwell and his followers in the Moral Majority are They encourage people to return to traditional values. Thus, option D is correct.
What was the Moral Majority?The Moral Majority was an organization comprised of conservative Christian political action organizations that campaigned on topics vital to the Moral Majority's Christian understanding of moral law.
Moral Majority was a social organization founded in 1979 that campaigned for Americans to return to their conservative social ideals.
Jerry Falwell, a televangelist, and the preacher was the organization's founder. Jerry Falwell and his Moral Majority adherents' major concerns are that they push people to return to traditional values. As a result, option D is correct.
Read more on the moral majority on :
brainly.com/question/10149496
#SPJ3
Which of the following statements reflect Jefferson's views on the Compromise and the slavery issue? Check all of the boxes that apply.
He was opposed to it.
He believed that slavery could destroy the union.
He believed the slavery issue would come up again.
He believed a geographic line separating slave and nonslave states was a good idea.
Answer:
The second statement is most likely your answer, however, if not then its the third statement at best.
Explanation:
Answer:A,B,C
Explanation:i chose the two but it was the fist three
When Julius Caesar became dictator of Rome, what reforms did he make?
Answer:
Explanation:
Caesar was now master of Rome and made himself consul and dictator. He used his power to carry out much-needed reform, relieving debt, enlarging the senate, building the Forum Iulium and revising the calendar. Dictatorship was always regarded a Focusing on economic reform during his time as Dictator for Life, Caesar improved land and waterways. His political reforms focused on creating physical structures, rebuilding cities and temples, and improving the Senate, The main ruling body in Rome.temporary position but in 44 BC, Caesar took it for life.
Julius Caesar implemented several reforms during his time as dictator of Rome. These included overhauling the Roman calendar, distributing land to the poor, granting citizenship to far-flung territories, increasing the size of the senate, and improving the efficiency of local government.
Explanation:When Julius Caesar became dictator of Rome, he brought about significant reforms. One of the major reforms was the restructuring of the Roman calendar, which was outdated and misaligned with the solar year. He introduced the Julian Calendar, with a year length of 365.25 days.
Additional reforms included land redistribution to the poor, granting citizenship to people in far territories of Rome, and reorganizing local government to be much more efficient and fair. He also increased the size of the senate and created new positions within it.
Although these reforms were seen as beneficial for the Roman Republic, they were also seen as an accumulation of power which sparked fear and mistrust among many Romans, leading to his eventual assassination in 44 BCE.
Learn more about Julius Caesar's reforms here:https://brainly.com/question/31565888
#SPJ12
What position did Charles Lindbergh take in the United States' involvement in the war? What reasons did Charles Lindbergh use in defending his position?
Answer:
Charles Lindergh was an avator who rose to fame as result of his feat in flying soloacross Atlantic ocean. His position on United States involvement in the war was against the Americans joining the war. This was as a result of his isolonist views with he held - of America protecting its own only.
He later supported the involvement of the United States of America in the war. This was as a result of the surprise bombing of the pearl habour by the Japanese. He went on to fly dozens of combat missions as a civilian contractor in the Pacific Theater of World War II.
Explanation:
Charles Lindbergh opposed U.S. involvement in World War II due to his belief in isolationism and skepticism of entering European conflicts.
Explanation:Charles Lindbergh opposed the United States' involvement in World War II. He was a prominent supporter of the America First Committee, which advocated for keeping the U.S. out of the war. Lindbergh's main reasons for defending his position included a belief in isolationism to protect American interests and a skepticism of entering European conflicts.
In his speeches and writings, Lindbergh emphasized that entering the war would lead to unnecessary loss of American lives and resources. He also argued that the U.S. should focus on strengthening its own defenses rather than intervening in foreign conflicts.
Lindbergh's stance was rooted in a desire to maintain American neutrality and avoid being drawn into the political turmoil of Europe. Despite facing criticism for his isolationist position, he remained steadfast in his belief that the U.S. should prioritize its own security over entanglement in overseas wars.
What encouraged people not to move west?
Answer:
Because Native Americans were still settled in the westernmost lands of America, the settlers did not want to move that way for fear of being attacked. Also, this part may be irrelevant depending on the time period, but at a certain period of time Britain still occupied forts in the West and settlers feared the British.
Answer:
extreme weather conditions, Indebtedness, Environmental issues
Explanation:
Please help!
Story:
Memories of a Memory
Have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when describing the event that your story seems to change the more you tell it? Have you ever experienced a time when you couldn't really describe something you saw in a way that others could understand? If so, you may understand why some experts think eyewitness testimony is unreliable as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials. New insights into human memory suggest human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things.
First, memory is vague. Imagine your room at home or a classroom you see every day. Most likely, you could describe the room very generally. You could name the color of the walls, the floors, the decorations. But the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. Memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. So when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall when faced with several tall people. There are lots of different kinds of "tall."
Second, memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps. Our brains reconstruct events and scenes when we remember something. To do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. For example, one day at a library you go to quite frequently, you witness an argument between a library patron and one of the librarians. Later, when telling a friend about the event, your brain may remember a familiar librarian behind the desk rather than the actual participant simply because it is recreating a familiar scene. In effect, your brain is combining memories to help you tell the story.
Third, your memory changes over time. It also changes the more you retell the story. Documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. Research has also shown that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it is. You may have noticed this yourself. The next time you are retelling a story, notice what you add, or what your brain wants to add, to the account. You may also notice that you drop certain details from previous tellings of the story.
With individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. Did you really break your mother's favorite vase when you were three? Was that really your father throwing rocks into the river with you when you were seven? The human brain may be quite remarkable indeed. When it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture.
Question:
Which phrase from the text most clearly explains the main idea of the second paragraph?
a. Memory is vague
b. Imagine your room at home
c. Rather than specific details
d. Her brain may recall
Answer:
yes I have
Explanation:
I have them all the time in my dream and then it's deja vu
Answer:
It a i took a test on it. I got 100% so it a
Explanation:
Do our votes actually go to the president? How do our votes work?
Answer: No.
Explanation:
So, when we vote we are voting for electors for the Electoral College. Then these electors cast votes for a particular candidate.
During World War II, what happened between the Communists and Nationalists in China?
They continued their civil war but also fought together in World War II.
Their civil war raged while they avoided involvement in World War II.
Both sides reached a permanent truce and fought together in World War II.
Both sides agreed to stop fighting each other until World War II ended.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
D is the best answer because the CPC and KMT agreed to a superficial peace after pressure from the international community, especially the USSR and the US. Throughout the war, the CPC and the KMT stood on a united front to defend against the Japanese. However, towards the end of the war, the two factions began to persevere their forces for the looming continuation of their civil war.
During World War II, the Communists and Nationalists in China temporarily set aside their civil war and formed a fragile alliance to fight together against the Japanese invaders.
During World War II, the relationship between the Communists, led by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) under Mao Zedong, and the Nationalists, led by the Chinese Nationalist Party (Kuomintang or KMT) under Chiang Kai-shek, was complex and marked by shifting alliances. Initially, both sides were engaged in a bitter civil war, which had been ongoing for several years prior to the outbreak of World War II. However, the Japanese invasion of China in the 1930s prompted a temporary truce between the two factions. They recognized the greater threat posed by the Japanese and agreed to cooperate in a united front against the common enemy.
This cooperation was far from perfect and was often strained, with each side suspicious of the other's motives. After World War II ended, the Chinese Civil War resumed, resulting in the Communist victory in 1949 and the establishment of the People's Republic of China. This historical context is crucial to understanding the dynamics of the Chinese theater during World War II, where the Communists and Nationalists had a temporary alliance, primarily focused on combating the Japanese invasion.
To know more about China:
https://brainly.com/question/35907841
#SPJ12
How have the internet and the World Wide Web fueled economic globalization
Answer:
The correct answer is 'by enabling e-commerce among people and businesses'
Explanation:
You are so welcome! :)
Which person is INCORRECTLY matched with his or her profession?
Benjy Brooks: doctor
Michael DeBakey: doctor
Michael Dell: agriculture
Walter Cunningham, Sr.: astronaut
Answer:
Walter Cunningham Sr
Explanation:
the Michael Dell is incorrectly matched with agriculture; he is actually known for his work in technology as the founder of Dell Technologies.
The person incorrectly matched with his profession in the question provided is the Michael Dell. Michael Dell is widely recognized as the founder and CEO of Dell Technologies, which specializes in computers and technology, not agriculture. In contrast, Benjy Brooks was indeed a doctor and the first woman pediatric surgeon in Texas. Michael DeBakey was a famous doctor known for his pioneering work in cardiovascular surgery, and Walter Cunningham, Sr. was an astronaut who flew on Apollo 7.
What special department did the Continental Army formed?
Answer:
The Continental Army was formed by the Second Continental Congress after the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War by the former British colonies that later became the United States of America
Explanation:
1. When giving a speech, what is a speaker's primary purpose?
To be impressive
To seem educated
To be understood
To be liked
Answer: To be understood
Explanation: To be clear and understood while you are speaking, especially in front of an audience
To be understood is a speaker's primary purpose. Hence, option C is correct.
What is meant by speaker's primary purpose?The majority of texts on public speaking cover the three main objectives of speeches: to inform, convince, and entertain. Although theoretically distinct, these general functions frequently overlap in actuality.
You will be expected to perform pre-speech research, write and outline speech scripts, and deliver persuasive speeches to audiences all around the state as a public speaker. It can also be necessary for you to interact with the audience and respond to their questions.
As a speaker, it is your duty to participate actively in the conversation. Make sure you speak life into yourself first before speaking life into someone else. If you're going to talk about limiting beliefs, be sure to talk about your own limiting beliefs as well.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about speaker's primary purpose, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29740962
#SPJ2
What happened in the war with the Russians and Japanese, and why was it bad for morale?
Answer:
It was the Russo-Japanese war that occurred during rapid industrialization of Japan, essentially it was bad for morale in Russia as their military was crushed by the Japan's which the Russians previously dominated. So essentially it kind of sucked they got beat up when they used to be so powerful.
Explanation:
what were some immediate impacts of the mashall plan?
Answer:
The May 1948 issue of Kiplinger was devoted to taking advantage of the Marshall Plan's economic ripple effect. Certainly, U.S. industries profited from the jolt of exporting to Western Europe. After all, the lifeline wasn't just a pile of cash; it included foodstuffs, agricultural equipment and machinery.
Explanation:
The Marshall Plan provided billions of dollars in economic aid to European nations after World War II; aiding the rebuilding of infrastructure, enhancing American presence and influence in Europe, and stemming the spread of Communism through the support to democratic governments.
Explanation:The Marshall Plan, or the European Recovery Program, had several immediate impacts following its implementation after World War II. Initiated by Secretary of State George C. Marshall in 1948, the program granted around $13 billion in economic aid to war-torn European countries with the goal of preventing the rise of Communism.
One immediate impact of the Marshall Plan was the commencement of the economic recovery process in the recipient countries. With the financial aid, these nations commenced rebuilding infrastructure, including factories, transportation systems, and power stations, which had been heavily damaged or destroyed during the war. This led to a significant economic bounce back for these nations.
Another crucial impact was the bolstering of American influence throughout Europe. Much of the aid had to be used on purchasing American goods, which not only augmented the postwar economy of the United States, but also heightened the American cultural presence and influence in Europe.
Furthermore, the plan successfully discouraged the spread of Communism in countries like France and Italy, as its pillars were the strengthening of democratic governments, thus alienating the Soviet Union and its Communist satellites, which refused to participate in the Plan, viewing it as a form of bribery.
Learn more about Marshall Plan here:https://brainly.com/question/22602380
#SPJ2
This was the president after Eisenhower.
A. Bush
B.Kennedy
C.Carter
Answer:
John F. Kennedy
Explanation:
Eisenhower was the 34th president of the US and Kennedy was the 35th.
Which of the following cases would be heard in juvenile court?
A. a 17 year old accusedhof stealing a car
B. a 15 year old accused of stealing a game from Wal-Mart
O
C. a 16 year old accused of armed robbery
D. a parent accused of abusing their 13 year old child
Answer:
the answer it's D.
Explanation:
I wish I helped you!
Cases involving a 15-year-old accused of stealing and a 16-year-old accused of armed robbery would be heard in juvenile court. A 17-year-old accused of a crime and a case involving an adult would go to adult court. The correct options are b and c.
The question at hand is which case would be heard in juvenile court. In Texas, individuals under the age of 18 are typically considered juveniles, with the exception that 17-year-olds who commit a crime are treated as adults. Given the options:
A. a 17-year old accused of stealing a car
B. a 15-year old accused of stealing a game from Wal-Mart
C. a 16-year old accused of armed robbery
D. a parent accused of abusing their 13-year old child
The cases that would be heard in juvenile court are those involving the 15-year-old and the 16-year-old, because they are under the age of 17. The case of the 17-year-old would go to adult court, and the parent's case would not be heard in juvenile court as it involves an adult defendant. Therefore, the correct answers are B and C.
Can you help me!!!!!!!!!!! Please
Please Hurry! Will Get Brainlest!
Constitution of the State of Georgia: Article V, Section I, Paragraphs III & IV-
Lieutenant Governor. There shall be a Lieutenant Governor, who shall be elected at the same time, for the same term, and in the same manner as the Governor. The Lieutenant Governor shall be the President of the Senate and shall have such executive duties as prescribed by the Governor and as may be prescribed by law not inconsistent with the powers of the Governor or other provisions of this Constitution. The compensation and allowances of the Lieutenant Governor shall be as provided by law.
Qualifications of Governor and Lieutenant Governor. No person shall be eligible for election to the office of Governor or Lieutenant Governor unless such person shall have been a citizen of the United States 15 years and a legal resident of the state six years immediately preceding the election and shall have attained the age of 30 years by the date of assuming office.
The United States Constitution: Article I, Section 3-
The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.
The United States Constitution: Article II, Section 1-
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term....
No Person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
The United States Constitution: Article II, Section 4-
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Based on these passages, in what way are the offices of Lieutenant Governor of Georgia and Vice President of the United States different?
A) They are elected at different times than the person they serve under.
B) There are no stated requirements to be Vice President of the United States.
C) One is a leader in the Legislative branch, the other is a leader in the Judicial branch.
D) The Lieutenant Governor of Georgia serves for a longer period of time than the Vice President
Answer: C) One is a leader in the Legislative branch, the other is a leader in the Judicial branch.
Explanation: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
How does the executive branch act as a check on the legislative branch in Texas
government?
The legislature has the power to veto bills signed by the governor.
The governor has the power to use a line item veto on spending bills passed by
the legislature
The governor has the power to overturn rulings by the Supreme Court of Texas.
The Supreme Court of Texas has the power to confirm appointments by the
governor
The executive branch act as a check on the legislative branch in Texas government by using veto power on spending bills passed by the legislature.
Veto power refers to a president or governor refusal to approve a bill and thus, preventing its enactment into law.
Hence, the executive branch act as a check on the legislative branch in Texas government by using veto power on spending bills passed by the legislature.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about Veto power
brainly.com/question/1233969
The right choice is The governor has the power to use a line item veto on spending bills passed by the legislature.
The executive branch in Texas acts as a check on the legislative branch primarily through the governor's veto power. The governor can veto bills passed by the legislature, and also has the authority to use a line-item veto on specific spending items in appropriations bills. This enables the governor to reject particular expenditures without having to veto the entire bill. Importantly, the timing of these vetoes often makes it impractical for the legislature to override them, which adds significant power to the governor's veto authority.Using your economic knowledge and the information in the article, compose a 350- to 450-word memo to your state’s commerce department evaluating the effects of NAFTA on the economies of the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Keep in mind that evaluation means to weigh both positives and negatives and then decide which side is stronger. Be sure to use topic sentences, conclusions, introductions, and transitions as well as proper grammar. Your memo should include citations from the article.
The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. however, trade is important, it is also very important to make sure that we are trading everything that we have at a fair price. It is important to decrease the amount of trade barriers and restrictions when trading with another Country. The NAFTA or the North American Free Trade Agreement was created to eliminate the number of tariffs and restrictions such as agriculture, textiles, and automobiles between three different countries, the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The NAFTA also provided property protection, established dispute resolution mechanisms, and made side agreements that implement labor and environmental safeguards. According to the article, "NAFTA and the USMCA: Weighing the Impact of North American Trade," "The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was a three-country accord negotiated by the governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States that entered into force in January 1994. NAFTA eliminated most tariffs on products traded between the three countries, with a major focus on liberalizing trade in agriculture, textiles, and automobile manufacturing. The deal also sought to protect intellectual property, establish dispute resolution mechanisms, and, through side agreements, implement labor and environmental safeguards." The amount of auto manufacturers, electronics, machinery, and appliances have increased in price between the three countries the United States, Canada, and Mexico since the NAFTA agreement. The NAFTA has increased the amount of production lines across all three of the countries with a decrease in the amount of production costs. According to the article "NAFTA and the USMCA: Weighing the impact of North American Trade," "For the United States and Canada, Mexico was seen both as a promising market for exports and as a lower-cost investment location that could enhance the competitiveness of U.S. and Canadian companies."
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was vital in enhancing free trade and the improvement in production among the United States, Canada and Mexico.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was put in place in 1994 in order to encourage free trade among the United States, Canada and Mexico. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was vital in the elimination of tariffs among the countries.Some of the positive effects of NAFTA include:
It led to an increase in trade.Better consumer prices.Increase in economic output.Increase in foreign investmentIncrease in the gross domestic product of the countries involved.The negative effects of NAFTA include:
Reduction in wages of the workers in the United States.Increase in competition affected small businesses.The government of the United States subsidized farm products into Mexico which led to the collapse of several local farms.In conclusion, despite the negative effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the positive effects outweigh the negative effects.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/16292775
19. The banner bears the words E PLURIBUS UNUM, which means "From many, one." Briefly explain why these words are included on the Great Seal.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Great Seal of the United States is a symbol of it independent and self government used to mark thegovernment approval of document such as proclamations, warrants, treaties, and commissions of high officials.
E pluribus unum is a traditional motto of the United States which means "out of many, one" in Latin,was first used on U.S. coinage in 1795, which was included in the Great seal to indicate unity among the various colonies,states that formed the United States of America which signify all of the people and states are one union.
The phrase 'E Pluribus Unum' on the Great Seal signifies the unity of the original thirteen colonies into a single nation, embodying the founding fathers' vision for one unified country.
Explanation:The words E Pluribus Unum, which mean "From many, one," are included on the Great Seal of the United States to represent the unity of the original thirteen colonies into a single nation. This motto echoes the founding principle that while the nation may be composed of diverse states and peoples, they come together to form one unified country. This concept is deeply rooted in the nation's history and was a fundamental aspect of the founding fathers' vision as expressed in documents such as the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, specifically in the Preamble which emphasizes the idea of forming a more perfect union.
When Jesus was arrested after the Last Supper, what was MOST LIKELY the
charge against him?
A. celebrating the Jewish holy days of Passover
B. committing treason or disloyalty to the government
C. leading an unlawful meeting
D. communicating parables and Beatitudes
Answer:B committing treason or disloyalty to the government
Explanation:
Answer:
B. committing treason or disloyalty to the governmentExplanation:
honeslty though they charged him for alot more
7. What kind of government was created by the Articles of
Confederation?
Answer:
A Confederation
Explanation:
A confederation gives states most of the power, and the Articles of Confederation stressed a new country governed majorly by states. This was because they were trying to avoid an issue similar to England where the central power became a totalitarian.
(20pts) Why do you think some individuals risked themselves to help others when so many did not? (HOLOCAUST)
Answer:
Because some people had family/friends that were in danger, they wanted to help others with their kindness, and some people knew they weren't gonna make it so they helped others. Also some people did not help others because they were maybe in a hiding place with trusted others and knew that they would be able to stay alive for longer,- so they stayed in a hiding place or went into hiding.
Explanation:
Final answer:
Some individuals risked themselves during the Holocaust due to a deep sense of altruism and moral duty, transcending personal risk to uphold humanity's ethical standards. Examples such as Irena Sendler and Oskar Schindler highlight courageous acts that defied oppressive regimes and saved lives. Understanding this altruism helps explain how society can encourage such bravery in crises.
Explanation:
During the Holocaust, some individuals risked their lives to help others despite widespread inaction or complicity. This moral courage was driven by a deeper sense of altruism and ethical conviction that transcended the risks involved. Historical examples like Irena Sendler saving children from the Warsaw ghetto, Oskar Schindler protecting his workers, or Dimitar Peshev stopping the deportation of Bulgarian Jews show that these individuals acted on a moral duty to protect humanity, often in direct defiance of oppressive and brutal regimes. By honoring the righteous at Yad Vashem, Israel commemorates such courage, hoping to inspire others to live righteous lives. The ability to act altruistically offers hope and serves as a testament to human decency in the darkest of times.
In assessing these acts of help, it is also crucial to recognize the interplay of self-concern and other-concern in human nature. Whether through gaining a sense of fulfillment or acting on moral imperatives, these individuals provided invaluable aid to those in dire need. The intertwined fates of people underline how one's benefits can extend to others, exemplifying altruistic behavior despite the controversy surrounding pure altruism. Researchers like Mark Snyder have studied this intersection, finding that volunteers often cite a blend of reasons for their actions, incorporating both self-interest and a genuine desire to help.
Understanding these dynamics of altruism and the capacity for defiance against inhumanity provides insight into how society as a whole can foster such courageous acts during times of moral crisis. The Holocaust serves as a stark reminder of both the potential for human evil and the profound acts of kindness that can resist it.
What is 1 + 2 = ??????????
Answer:
when you sum up 1 and 2 it gives 3.