1. Environment
2. Role/Position
3. Personalities
1. Environment describes the external surroundings that a person may find themselves in, such as a warm and comfortable house may make that person relaxed, alternatively on a mountain in winter with the wind blowing they may feel anxious and lacking confidence, or starting a new job in a new facility they may feel excited and eager to get started.
2. Role/Position describes the job or function that person is required to perform. A high positioned executive may feel stressed and burnt out at times; the post delivery person may feel under valued and resentful that their full capabilities are not being used. Alternatively, the executive may feel empowered and energetic when a project they are working on succeeds, and the post delivery person may feel appreciated in work, but has a great work/life balance and has an emerging career as a musician outside work.
3. Personalities describes the many different personality types that exist in the world, and the way each interact with each other. Certain personality types like things done in certain ways, and when they come up against dis-similar types that work in different ways, it can affect how people feel and perform. the whole world of people interacting together if very complex and it is difficult to pin point one issue that affects our moods and other peoples moods.
How people react to external influences is very much dependent upon their internal personality, current mood, stress level, psychological condition, use of medications, family stability state, financial well-being, level of illness, worry level , amount of sleep they had over the last few days and the support or lack of support they may be receiving at the time. People react and feel differently depending upon all these factors, so the same external influence may prompt a variety of different responses, depending upon the internal factors that are affecting the person at that specific time.
Final answer:
Three external influences that may affect how a person feels about themselves include social and family influences, culture, and media. Two internal influences include self-concept and self-esteem. These factors shape self-perception and can lead to positive or negative feelings about themselves.
Explanation:
External Influences That May Affect Self-Perception
Social and Family Influences: Our family, friends, and broader social circles can heavily influence how we see ourselves. The values, beliefs, and expectations of these groups can shape our behavior and, in turn, our self-perception. Positive reinforcement can boost self-esteem, while criticism or neglect can have the opposite effect.
Culture: Culture provides a framework of norms and values that individuals use to evaluate themselves. It can instill pride and a sense of belonging but can also lead to internalized pressures and feelings of inadequacy if one feels they don't meet cultural standards.
Media: Through advertising, marketing, and social networks, media plays a powerful role in dictating trends, norms, and ideals. Constant exposure to idealized images and narratives can lead to dissatisfaction and negative self-perception when comparing oneself to these unrealistic standards.
Internal Influences That May Affect Self-Perception
Self-Concept: Our self-concept is our understanding of who we are, which is developed through personal experiences and reflections. A well-grounded self-concept can lead to healthy self-esteem, while a negative self-concept can reduce confidence and self-worth.
Self-Esteem: This is the evaluative aspect of our self-concept or our feelings about our worth. High self-esteem tends to result in more positive self-perception, while low self-esteem can result in feelings of worthlessness and a negative self-perception.
From which city did
General Burgoyne march
his troops to Saratoga?
Answer:
Burgoyne marched into New York from Canada
Explanation:
General Burgoyne marched his troops to Saratoga from the city of St. Johns in present-day Quebec, Canada during the American Revolutionary War in 1777.
Explanation:General John Burgoyne marched his British troops to Saratoga from St. Johns, a city located in present-day Quebec, Canada. This march was part of the Saratoga campaign during the American Revolutionary War in 1777, which aimed at gaining control over the Hudson River valley. Despite the initial successes, Burgoyne's campaign ultimately ended in defeat at the Battle of Saratoga, a turning point in the war.
Learn more about Saratoga Campaign here:https://brainly.com/question/33243956
#SPJ2
After World War II, American policymaker George Kennan came up with the idea of containment, which stressed stopping the further spread of communism using financial and military means. The Korean War was an example of the use of military force to contain communism. The Marshall Plan was an example of using financial resources to stop the spread of communism. In your opinion, which method was more effective in containment? Why
Answer:
The Marshall Plan.
Explanation:
It gave stability (Money and aid) back to the countries that were decimated by the War.
Military:
Financial aid would not have stopped the military invasion of South Korea. South Korea is a democracy today because of our military intervention.
Financial:
Communism can take root only in societies that are unstable. The Marshall Plan stabilized many countries, making a radical ideology, such as communism, unattractive to the people of those countries.
The Marshall Plan protected more countries than military intervention could.
What is the percentage of migrant workers are from Mexico? In the 1970
5.
How have the ancient and much older land routes contributed to exchange of ideas and
goods? Explain
Answer:
Tran saharan trade
Explanation:
This trade allowed the white to gain goods from africa especially west africa along with north africa which allowed them to gain the goods like oil and other products today
what did the wages do in the late 19th centry
Answer and Explanation:
The 19th century saw large amounts of social change; slavery was abolished, and the First and Second Industrial Revolution led to massive urbanization and much higher levels of productivity, profit and prosperity. European imperialism brought much of Asia and almost all of Africa under colonial rule.
In the 70s, Pakistan and India played only 3 matches against each other. How many did Pakistan won?
Answer:
1 or 2
Explanation:
i don't know i just guest
Answer:
2
Explanation:
India and Pakistan have a well-known rivalry when it comes to cricket. Both nations have excellent teams, and the sport is very popular in both regions. During the 1970s, Pakistan and India played only 3 matches against each other. The first one was a draw. In the second one (Lahore), Pakistan won by 8 wickets. Finally, in the third one (Karachi), Pakistan also won by 8 wickets.
What was the most likely effect of Inca gold arriving in
Europe?
• More countries began to invest in expeditions to the
Americas.
More Europeans protested the cruel treatment of
American Indians.
O Fewer Europeans were willing to colonize the
Americas
O Fewer countries could raise the funds needed for
exploration
The answer is a I took the test
Answer:
More countries began to invest in expeditions to the Americas
Explanation:
The Spanish were the first Europeans that managed to conquer large territories in the New World. This led to the downfall of multiple civilizations, such as the Inca civilization. The Incas were a civilization that highly appreciated the gold, for religious purposes not for wealth, and they had it in abundance. The Spanish managed to get their hands on most of it, and big portion of it ended up back in Europe. The word quickly spread out, so the other nations wanted to get a piece of the gold from the New World, and that sparked lot of new expeditions from several different countries.
How did the Panic of 1819 create conflict between members of the Democratic-
Republican Party?
O
A. Northern industrialists wanted high tariffs, southern plantation owners
did not
O
B. Southern plantation owners wanted a national bank; northerner
industrialists did not.
C. Southern plantation owners wanted to abolish debtors' prisons;
northerner industrialists did not
D
Northern industrialists wanted more states' rights: southern plantation
owners did not.
The Panic of 1819 deepened division and conflict within the Democratic-Republican Party. Northern industrialists supported protective tariffs and a strong national bank while Southern plantation owners were in opposition due to their reliance on trade and their belief these policies favored industrialists.
Explanation:The Panic of 1819 was a significant economic crisis in the United States that brought an end to the era of the so-called 'Good Feelings'. One of its major political impacts was the deepened division and conflict amongst members of the Democratic-Republican Party.
A major cause of the Panic was the practices of the Second Bank of the United States, which had recently tightened its lending policies and called in many of its existing loans. This led to widespread financial hardships and foreclosures. Northern industrialists and Southern plantation owners, who were greatly affected by these policies, had different viewpoints on the role of the national bank and federal monetary policies.
Members of the Party who were Northern industrialists focused primarily on protective tariffs and a strong national bank to support their industrial activities. On the other hand, Southern plantation owners, who relied heavily on trade of their agricultural goods and were opposed to policies that they felt disproportionately favored industrialists, were against such high tariffs and a strong national bank.
Learn more about Panic of 1819 here:https://brainly.com/question/13308389
#SPJ3
What type of material was scarce in the South?
Answer:iron
Explanation:
Answer: The correct answer is : Weapons and ammunition were too scarce in the south.
Explanation: The men had to bring their own weapons. The soldiers had many needs, some as elementary as shoes. In the south, cars, horses, tents and uniforms were also in short supply. Food was scarce throughout the war. Finally the south lost the war because it ran out of money, without men and without supplies.
According to the online article about Algeria, rai is a __________.
A.
religious holiday
B.
game
C.
type of music
D.
type of food
Answer:
The answer is C) type of music
Answer: c
Explanation:
How did the Vietnam War affect immigration to the United States in the 1970s?
-Asian immigration increased because many Vietnamese people escaped the chaos and violence after the war.
-Only a few children emigrated from Vietnam because families of US service personnel faced restrictive policies.
-War refugees were kept from entering the country because they were considered illegal immigrants.
-Fewer Vietnamese people were interested in immigrating to the United States in the wake of the war.
The correct answer is A) Asian immigration increased because many Vietnamese people escaped the chaos and violence after the war.
The Vietnam War affect immigration to the United States in the 1970s in that Asian immigration increased because many Vietnamese people escaped the chaos and violence after the war.
The Vietnam War confronted Noth Vietnam, supported by the Soviet Union and South Vietnam, supported by the United States. The Russians wanted to spread Communist in the region and the United States wanted to stop it. Rochard Nixon ordered the withdrawal of the US troops in 1973 and North Vietnam ended up winning the war in 1975, unifying the country as the Socialist Republic of Vietnam in 1976.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Which of the following results in an increase in the standard of living?
A. An increase in unemployment pushes down the cost of
production
B. Income increases, enabling consumers to buy more goods and
services.
C. Rising production costs drive up the price of goods and services.
D. Wages go up to correct for the inflation of prices.
Answer:
B. Income increases, enabling consumers to buy more goods and
services.
Explanation:
An increase in the standard of living would come with an increase in the income. By increasing your income, you open your possibilities of what you can acquire. For example, if you increase the income from a certain society without modifying the costs of the goods, then people eventually will buy more goods and services. In economics there’s the statement that “with higher consumption levels, there is greater prosperity”.
Final answer:
The option that leads to an increase in standard of living is income increases, which enable consumers to buy more goods and services. This direct effect of increased purchasing power contributes to an enhanced standard of living.
Explanation:
When considering which of the given options results in an increase in the standard of living, we need to understand the economic impacts of each option:
An increase in unemployment, which might push down production costs, does not inherently increase the standard of living, because the benefits of lower production costs may not be passed on to consumers, and higher unemployment can lead to a weaker economy overall.Income increases allow consumers to purchase more goods and services, directly contributing to an enhanced standard of living.Rising production costs typically lead to higher prices for goods and services, which can decrease the standard of living if wages do not keep up with these costs.Wages rising to correct for inflation simply maintains purchasing power rather than increasing it, so it does not actually increase the standard of living, it just prevents it from falling.Hence, the answer is B. Income increases, enabling consumers to buy more goods and services.
The Warren Court further defined the separation of church and state in what two cases?
Answer:
The correct answer is Everson v. Board of Education, Lemon v. Kurtzman and Agostini v. Felton.
Explanation:
This cases were the one that really made the court to apply the first amendment religous liberties.
how did railroads change where people lived ?
Answer:
So the people had better transportation and better timing.
Explanation:
Answer:the invention of the railroad allowed people to move harvests at a faster spend allowing them to move more at a time
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT true about Nelson Mandela?
He was a farmer.
He led massive peaceful protests against apartheid.
He, along with others, started the African National Congress.
He was imprisoned for over 20 years.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Although Mandela later became associated with the African National Congress, he was not one of its original founders.
Mandela was indeed a farmer, led protests against Apartheid, and was imprisoned for 27 years.
Put these events in the correct order in which they occurred during Carter’s presidency. Borrowing declined. Interest rates rose. Inflation dropped, slowing the economy.
Answer: 2,1,3
Explanation:
The correct order in which they occurred during Carter’s presidency.
Interest rates rose. Borrowing declinedInflation droppedWhat issue hurt Carter's presidency?On November 4, 1979, Iranian militants stormed the United States Embassy in Tehran and took approximately seventy Americans captive. This terrorist act triggered the most profound crisis of the Carter presidency and began a personal ordeal for Jimmy Carter and the American people that lasted 444 days.
What economic problems did Carter's presidency have?The massive inflation and oil crisis of the 1970s damaged Jimmy Carter's presidency.
To learn more about Carter’s presidency, refer
https://brainly.com/question/17087215
#SPJ2
What statement was true about the English and French colonies?
Answer:
Need to know the statements first, to answer if it's true or not. Sorry about that.
Explanation:
Answer:
They would all turn out to be independent countries one day.
Explanation:
The English colonies turned out to the the Unites States of America, and the French colonies turned out to be Canada.
Explain what you think Machiavelli is saying. Do you agree or disagree with him
Well, I'm not sure what passage you're talking about, but a lot of his writings reflect on the idea that the ends justify the means, which means you can kill and torture as long as you think the end result is worth it, which would make sense, since he sided with the Medici's, basically the first mob family. If you're talking about "it is better to be feared than to be loved," he's talking about your stance according to the public. I personally believe that neither of these statements are morally sound because they eerily remind me of Hitler, but to each his own.
Machiavelli's "The Prince" is a political treatise written in the 16th century by Italian philosopher and writer Niccolò Machiavelli. It is a guidebook for rulers on how to acquire and maintain political power. The book is divided into chapters that cover various aspects of leadership and governance.
Machiavelli argues that leaders should be practical and realistic, rather than guided solely by moral or idealistic principles. He suggests that leaders should base their decisions on a clear assessment of the current situation and act accordingly.
Agreements with Machiavelli's ideas:
1. Realism in politics: Many agree with Machiavelli's emphasis on the need for leaders to be practical and realistic in their approach to politics. They argue that leaders should base their decisions on a clear assessment of the current situation, rather than being guided solely by moral or idealistic principles.
2. Flexibility and adaptability: Machiavelli's ideas about the importance of leaders being adaptable and willing to change their strategies to suit the circumstances are also seen as valuable. In a complex and ever-changing political landscape, the ability to adjust one's approach can be crucial for maintaining power and achieving desired outcomes.
Learn more about Machiavelli here:
https://brainly.com/question/672909
#SPJ2
The complete question is, "Explain what you think Machiavelli is saying known for his book "The Prince". Do you agree or disagree with him"
In a factory that produces jeans, one worker cuts out the pieces of fabric based on a pattern, another worker sews the
pieces together, another adds the zipper, another steams the fabric, and so forth. This is an example of
communism
Import substitute industrialization
division of labor
comparative advantage
Answer:
In a factory that produces jeans, one worker cuts out the pieces of fabric based on a pattern, another worker sews the
pieces together, another adds the zipper, another steams the fabric, and so forth. This is an example of division of labor -fourth choice
Answer:
C.) division labor
Explanation:
division of labor as the most efficient means of production that is used by having several workers involved in factory production
Why would people be willing to risk their lives for democracy
Answer:
Democracy is not just the ability of citizens to vote for the candidates they want. It is not even the simple fact that the government responds to the will of the people. Democracy is a form of political organization that respects its citizens, their lives, their freedom, their property and their principles.
The possibility of choosing, of saying what we thought, of educating ourselves, of making decisions freely, we owe to democracy. America, as a democracy, guarantees these rights and many more for its citizens, but there are authoritarian countries that do not, in which their inhabitants suffer from their lack of rights.
Without the right to freedom, no life is complete, so many citizens risk their lives to obtain it. Some do so by fleeing, such as Cubans who risk their lives in rafts in the middle of the ocean, but others do so by fighting tyrant governments, giving their lives to obtain or defend democracy around the world.
Some young drivers make more mistakes because they have a greater interest in __________.
A. taking risks
B. learning from their driving experiences
C. avoiding distractions on the road
Answer:
A. taking risks
Explanation:
Some young drivers make more mistakes because they have a greater interest in taking risks.
Young drivers usually make more mistakes due to their greater interest in taking risks. They are often impulsive and underestimate the consequences of their actions, leading to risky behaviors such as speeding or neglecting safety procedures.
Explanation:This question indicates that more mistakes are made by young drivers due to their greater interest in taking risks. Young people are often attracted to risks and might take impulsive decisions while driving, leading to mistakes. Although some young drivers might learn from their driving experiences or try to avoid distractions on the road, it's the risk factor that typically results in more mishaps.
For instance, since young drivers are more prone to experiments and often underestimate the consequences, they may be more likely to speed, follow too closely, or neglect to wear seatbelts. All these risky behaviors can contribute to more driving mistakes.
Learn more about Young Drivers here:https://brainly.com/question/36453172
#SPJ3
Select all that apply.
Why did some people oppose women's right to vote?
because they believed women were too emotional to vote
because women could not read or write
because women were superior to men
because they believed that women needed to be protected from political life
Answer:
because they believed that women needed to be protected from political life ( last choice)
because they believed women were too emotional to vote ( first choice)
Answer: because they believed that women needed to be protected from political life and because they believed women were too emotional to vote, I do so believe.
men i swear *sigh* hope this helps T-T
What conclusion can you draw about the revolution
from the photo and the background information?
a) Most of the protesters were soldiers.
b) Most of the protesters were soldiers' families.
c) Most of the protesters were men.
d) Most of the protesters supported the government.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It looks to me that the number of people of either gender were about equal. Still the ones holding the banners were women, and from the banners, it looks like they were the most concerned about how their families were to be fed.
I would pick B.
Answer:
b
Explanation:because its right
The Renaissance encouraged people to:
Answer:
encouraged many Church reformers, such as Martin Luther, and they later broke with Rome and divided Europe into two confessional camps, Protestantism and Catholicism.
Answer:
Read and write, travel extensively, and learn Latin.
Explanation:
The Renaissance encouraged people to read and write, travel extensively, and learn Latin.
with the passage _____, tariffs among the United States, Mexico, and Canada were reduced.
Answer:
NAFTA
Explanation:
NAFTA was an agreement between the 3 North American countries to promote trading with each other and it has worked very effectively so far.
Answer:
NAFTA was an agreement between the 3 North American countries to promote trading with each other and it has worked very effectively so far.
Explanation:
Why was the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison significant?
Answer:
It established the power of judicial review.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Which statement best summarizes U.S. actions in Central and South America
during the Cold War?
A. The United States launched coups against right leaning dictators to weaken soviet influence.
B. The United States forced poor countries in the region to adopt expensive social programs
C. The United States abandoned the domino theory in the region and worked with leftist groups.
D. The United States Lost popularity in the region by helping to overthrow elected leaders
Answer:
D. The United States lost popularity in the region by helping to overthrow elected leaders
Explanation:
The United States were constantly involved in Central and South America's politics and internal affairs after the countries of these regions gained independence. During the Cold War though, the people of these two regions got fed up with the interference of the United States. The reason for this was that the United States were constantly financing dictators, helping them overthrow elected leaders, and were creating constant chaos. The people were not willing to put up with this anymore, and as their revolt was growing, the United States were pushed out of big portions of these regions, with their popularity shrinking.
Final answer:
The best summary of U.S. actions in Central and South America during the Cold War is that the U.S. helped to overthrow elected leaders to contain communism, which led to a loss of popularity in the region. So, option D is correct.
Explanation:
During the Cold War, the United States focused on containing the spread of communism in Central and South America. This policy often involved supporting right-leaning dictators who were anti-communist, as part of the so-called 'Our Dictator' philosophy. This meant that the U.S. sometimes helped to overthrow elected leaders or supported authoritarian regimes, resulting in losing popularity in the region. Successful communist revolutions occurred in Cuba in 1959 and Nicaragua in 1979. However, the fall of the Soviet Union led to a change in U.S. policy, as the rationale for supporting such dictators ended. So, option D is correct.
The Great strike of 1877
A) was bloodier than most Civil war battles.
B) Underscored the tension produced by rapid industrialization.
C) Shattered the myth of worker solidarity.
D) proved the theory of Social Darwinism.
Someone please help, I’m not sure what the answer is for this one, anything helps. Thank you !!
E) demonstrated how effective the knights of labor could be in organizing workers.
African Americans who settled in the Plains region of the United States were
known by what name?
A. Exodusters
B. Scalawags
C. Maroons
D. Carpetbaggers
SHIRT
Thanks for submitting your question to Brainly!
African Americans who settled in the Plains region of the United States were known as Exodusters.
Answer:
Exodusters
Explanation:
What was one impact of the British abolition movement during the 19th
century?
O
A. It succeeded in convincing the British government to outlaw
slavery decades before the United States did.
O
B. It was the first major antislavery movement to rely on legal, rather
than religious, arguments against slavery.
O
C. It was a capitalist economic movement that argued that it cost
more to allow slavery than it did to end it.
O
D. It ended slavery in Great Britain itself, but not in any of its colonial
territories around the world,
Answer:
It succeeded in convincing the British government to outlaw
slavery decades before the United States did. -A.
The correct option is (A) It succeeded in convincing the British government to outlaw slavery decades before the United States did.
After the Civil War started out in 1861, abolitionists rallied to the Union cause. They had a good time while President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, putting forward the slaves unfastened in lots of elements of the South. In 1865, the thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolished slavery withinside the country.Effect of the British abolition motion at some point of the 19thcentury-In the gap of simply forty six years, the British authorities outlawed the slave change that Britain had created and went directly to abolish the exercise of slavery during the colonies. John Oldfield suggests how this countrywide marketing campaign have become one of the maximum a success reform moves of the nineteenth century.Learn more about the British abolition movement https://brainly.com/question/9016444
#SPJ2