7. Describe how money's portability, uniformity, and divisibility have impacted recent purchases you have
made.

As a Bolshevik, the most likely reaction to the Call to Power would be one of euphoria and excitement. As a member of the Provisional government however, one would react with dread and uncertainty.

What was the Call to Power?It was issued by Lenin on October 24, 1917.It gave reasons why the Bolsheviks should seize power in Russia.

Lenin was a Bolshevik which meant that Bolsheviks listening to this call would most likely have been excited at the chance to take control. Members of the Provisional government however, would most likely have been afraid as they were the ones in power and so would be overthrown by the Bolsheviks.

In conclusion, Bolsheviks would have been excited and Provisional government members would have been scared.

Find out more on the Bolsheviks at https://brainly.com/question/1106721.

Final answer:

As a Bolshevik, you'd likely support the call to power due to a shared revolutionary and communist ideology, whereas as a member of the provisional government, you'd be alarmed by the Bolsheviks' threat to your authority. If the provisional government had made peace with the Central Powers, it might have undermined support for Lenin's Bolsheviks, although this would depend on the efficacy of the government's other reforms.

Explanation:

If you were a Bolshevik during the call to power, you would likely react with enthusiasm and a revolutionary spirit. The Bolsheviks were intent on seizing power and implementing radical changes according to Communist principles. They were driven by the urgent needs of the Russian populace, namely "peace, land, and bread," and were ready to capitalize on the weakness of the provisional government and widespread disillusionment with the ongoing war. As a member of the provisional government, such as those led by Alexander Kerensky, you would likely react to the Bolshevik's call to power with opposition and concern, recognizing the significant threat they posed to your temporary authority and the liberal and democratic ideals you were possibly trying to uphold. The provisional government aimed for a gradual transition of power, but the Bolsheviks were determined to institute immediate and sweeping changes.

Considering a hypothetical situation where the provisional government had agreed to peace with the Central Powers to focus on solving Russia's internal issues, it's conceivable that this move could have undermined support for Lenin and the Bolsheviks. By addressing the urgent demands for peace, the provisional government might have satisfied a significant part of the population's immediate needs, potentially reducing the appeal of the Bolsheviks' radical approach to those issues. However, if the government failed to address the demands for land reform and food security effectively, the Bolsheviks would likely continue to gain support.

Throughout the period leading up to the October Revolution in 1917, the Bolsheviks were increasingly seen by soldiers, workers, and peasants as a viable alternative to the current government due to their decisive and straightforward promises. The Bolsheviks' subsequent actions, such as the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Germany, illustrated their commitment to fulfilling their promises, despite the unfavorable terms of the peace that ceded vast territories to Germany.

Learn more about Bolsheviks' Call to Power

https://brainly.com/question/15854957

#SPJ3

Answer:

A.

They are normally written in chronological order.

*It cant be B because it doesn't have to be a famous person and it cant be C because its non-fiction. And not D because that is an argument/persuasive essay

Personal narrative essays are written accounts of personal experiences or events from the author's life. The true statement about personal narrative essays is, "They are normally written in chronological order". Hence, option A is the correct answer.

They typically follow a chronological order, presenting the events in the order in which they occurred. This helps to create a coherent and organized narrative that allows the reader to follow the story and understand the progression of events.

Option B is not accurate because personal narrative essays are focused on the author's own life experiences, not those of a famous person.

Option C is also incorrect because personal narrative essays are based on real-life experiences and are non-fictional in nature.

Option D is not always true for personal narrative essays.

Hence, option A is the correct answer.

Learn more about Personal narrative essays here:

brainly.com/question/7851404

#SPJ4

-equality and marginalization.

-Conflict.

-Hunger, malnutrition, and stunting.

-Poor healthcare systems — especially for mothers and children.

-Little or no access to clean water, sanitation, and hygiene.

-Climate change.  

-Lack of education.

-Poor public works and infrastructure.

Answer:

the most recognized causes of poverty are

illiteracy population increaselack of awarenesslack of family planning measures.

Explanation:

Answer:

I think B or D

Explanation:

Answer: C

Explanation:

Answer:

Rome fell through a gradual process because poor economic policies led to a weakened military which allowed the barbarians easy access to the empire

Explanation:

Answer:

between 1941 and 1945

Explanation:Hitler and Nazis were responsible.

make this brainliest!

Answer:

The Holocaust started in 1941. And it ended around May 8, 1945. The people that were responsible for it were the German Nazi's.

Explanation:

Hope this helped

:)

Answer:

By pressuring them to sign a treaty that allowed them to get the land.

Explanation:

Not sure if you need the name of the treaty but it is the treaty of san ildefonso

C.monarchy


I think so

Answer:

Mesopotamian religion was polytheistic, while Israelsities worship Judaism.

The union forces where  heading  towards (C) Richmond when they met the Confederates at  Fredericksburg

Explanation:

The Battle of Fredericksburg refers to the battle that was fought between the Union forces and the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia in the year 1862.

The union forces where led by Maj Gen. Ambrose Burnside. and the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia General Robert E. Lee

Major General Ambrose Burnside led the Union toward Richmond and they headed towards  the Confederates at  Fredericksburg.

This battle (i.e. Battle of Fredericksburg)  was a big defeat  for the Union Army against the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia

Thus we can say that The union forces where  heading  towards (C) Richmond when they met the Confederates at  Fredericksburg

Answer: Explanation:

They set up Imperial governments in the land to  exploit the natural and human resources of the continent.  

Each European  countries involved  aimed to increase its prestige  by accumulating territories in other parts of the world including Africa. By 1900,the Berlin conference to divide Africa brought about nominal control of African territory by Europe. All this was done without the consent of African people.

The European nations basically want cheap labors that they cannot get from their own country..so in search of cheap labors they set up a base at south Africa and stated deporting slaves..

The European nations sought to expand their economies  by obtaining raw materials from Africa which could be transported back to domestic factories and turned into manufactured goods for sale at the expense of the African people.

When European nations established colonies in Africa in the late 1800s, they exercised complete economic and political control over the colonies. Thus, option (c) is correct.

What is colonies?

Between the 15th and 20th centuries, when European nations colonized the Americas, Africa, and Asia for economic, political, and strategic reasons, the term "colony" was most frequently used to refer to these settlements.

The Berlin Conference of 1884 set the laws for European colonization and trade in Africa, which in turn regulated the colonization of Africa. The colonization of Africa was fueled by competition among European nations for control of African resources.

As a result, the significance European nations established colonies in Africa in the late 1800s are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (c) is correct.

Learn more about on colonies, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13673860

#SPJ5

Answer:

America wanted California because of the gold available there that they didn't want other countries to get.They also wanted to express there natural born right o Manifest destiny on their newly found land.

Explanation:

The ideals of the nation are set forth in the introduction to the United States Constitution, and they include justice. Therefore, because slavery is unjust, the leaders of the nation have every right to prevent its spread into new territories

John Quincy Adams was the 6th president of the United States. He was famous for being politically independent and also his patriotism for his country. He can be called ambitious as well as determined in character.

Further information about the president is as given below:

• According to the journals of John Quincy Adams, he held the belief that prohibition of slavery in the western countries was constitutional.

• In the constitution of the United States, the ideals for the country have been written and they include the term justice.

• Slavery should be prohibited as it is simply unjust, which is mentioned in the constitution as well.

Therefore, John Quincy Adams had strong feelings regarding the prohibition of slavery during his presidency.

Learn more about John Quincy Adams here:

https://brainly.com/question/2772596

Charleston and Mobile

The major destinations for Southern cotton were Great Britain, where it fed the British mills, and New Orleans, which was a key trading hub.

The major destinations for Southern cotton were Great Britain and New Orleans. The Southern states were the majority suppliers of cotton to Britain, which was then used in British mills in places like Manchester. New Orleans served as a crucial hub for domestic and international cotton trade, becoming a diverse and wealthy city because of it. This trade was so significant that by 1860, cotton exports comprised more than 60 percent of the United States' total exports.

Answer:

The Civil War helped the Texas economy develop at a fast rate. For example,  Texas developed a high-tech industry after a slump in oil prices, continued reliance on oil production which brought in more money for the economy, and had a boom and bust cycle of the oil industry.

Texas responded to the election of Abraham Lincoln by joining the Confederacy in early 1861, a few weeks before the first shots were fired at Fort Sumter. Although only about one in four Texas families owned slaves, support for secession was strong, with about three quarters of voters supporting secession. Many Texas men immediately joined the war effort, traveling east to fight with other Confederate soldiers. Many others joined but stayed in Texas, with some defending the coastline, some guarding against possible Union attack, and others pushing into New Mexico Territory. A small number joined the Union army.

Barriers to trade continued until the war’s end. Imports of goods from northern factories ceased, transportation networks were damaged, and Union blockades made it difficult for cotton growers to export their crops. Trade with Mexico provided some relief. But without larger trade networks, the residents of Texas suffered from shortages of many kinds. Still, for many people fleeing the Deep South, Texas was safer ground. Many traveled to Texas as refugees, often bringing slaves with them.

The Civil War years saw an increase in the number of slaves in the state. For some, there was an awareness of the fight for their freedom – an awareness captured in memories like those of Mose Smith, a former slave from Texas who spoke of hearing about the conflict but being too far away to have direct knowledge of the war. Although many men from slave-owning families were serving in the military, slaves’ work and bondage remained very much intact during the war.

In cities and rural areas, women stepped in to do work formerly done by men who were away at war. Throughout the state, the absence of men pushed women left at home to take on significant new roles in the household, including that of farmer and provider. Women were tasked with taking care of their families alone, in a time of hardship and shortages. For women whose husbands died during the war, that role often continued after the war’s end.

Differences in political belief also created problems for many Texans during the war. Opposition to secession was common among recent German immigrants in the Hill Country, in some north Texas counties, and among many Tejanos and Mexican Texans. In some cases, those views led to violence. In 1862, three dozen Union sympathizers — most of them German Texans — were massacred near the Nueces River while they were trying to flee to Mexico. A monument was erected in their honor in 1866, and can still be seen today.

When the war ended with Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House on April 9, 1865, the official news did not reach Texas for weeks. It arrived on June 19, 1865 – a day now celebrated as Juneteeth – when General Gordon Granger and Union forces landed in Galveston. They had arrived to occupy the state, and to order the emancipation of all slaves in Texas. Reconstruction had begun.

Reconstruction was not an easy time for Texans. Residents had to pledge their loyalty to the United States, abolish slavery, and declare that secession from the union was illegal. For many former slaves, freedom from bondage provided limited opportunities for building new lives.

Anger at the war’s outcome simmered in Reconstruction-era Texas. Freedmen became the primary targets of widespread violence that followed the war’s end. Texan voters did not help to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment (abolishment of slavery) or the Fourteenth Amendment (declaration of citizenship for African Americans). And despite the formal end of slavery in the United States, Texas and other former Confederate states enacted restrictions for African Americans that severely limited their rights. Despite those tensions, after an uneasy five years, Texas was readmitted to the Union in March of 1870.

Texas’ return to the United States did not end the turmoil. Despite new railroad lines and industrial growth in the state, Texas remained a largely agrarian-based economy. Animosity toward the Republican party and Reconstruction policies led to the election of a former Confederate officer as governor in 1872. Slave labor was replaced with the sharecropping system, which kept African Americans in poverty and subservience to white male landowners for years to come. Old conflicts with Native Americans – largely set aside during the Civil War years — boiled over with new violence. A series of wars, known as the Indian Wars, pushed the remaining tribes in Texas off of their land, and ended in death, imprisonment or surrender for a series of Native American leaders. Both the Apaches and Comanches were expelled from the state.

Answer:

Germany

Explanation:

Otto van Bismarck used nationalism to unite the German people and expand Prussia/Germany's military and land to become one of Europe's best militaries

Answer:

The North

Explanation:

The North had more resources because President abe lincoln was the president at the time and he was supplying resources only to the north not the south.

Answer:

Planet => Satellite

Mars => Deimos

Jupiter => Europa

Saturn => Titan

Uranus => Miranda

Neptune => Triton

Pluto => Nix

Eris => Dysmonia

Haumea => Namaka

Answer:

Planet => Satellite

Mars => Deimos

Jupiter => Europa

Saturn => Titan

Uranus => Miranda

Neptune => Triton

Pluto => Nix

Eris => Dysmonia

Haumea => Namaka

Explanation:

Answer:

C. Enforcing laws

seems to be the most correct

Answer:

The industrial revolution began in Great Britain. The industrial revolution was the beginning of a new era, a new manufacturing of a new type of machinery.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

The industrial revolution began in the United Kingdom. The industrial revolution marked the start of a new era, with new machinery being manufactured.

What is industrial?

The term “industrial” refers to a large scale of manufacturing operations. The industrial work in particular areas is production in bulk. The industrial sector contributes to economic activity. The industrial are the main focuses are the production of the commodities. The industrial are the run with the large level of the workers.

During the period of the 1800s, the technology was the advanced level, the higher level of the employees and the workers are the work. There are the long work hours because of the production of the high level. There was the no hazard faced by industrial workers are the mainly in the high unemployment, that's the reason was the Lobley opposed.

As  a result, the industrial revolution began in the United Kingdom. The industrial revolution marked the start of a new era, with new machinery being manufactured.

Learn more about on industrial, here:

https://brainly.com/question/4363767

#SPJ2

Bierce uses the method to draw out a single moment in the life of the person to a long drawn introspection on life.

Explanation:

The Incident at Owl Creek Bridge by Bierce is one of the great short stories of all time.

It uses the last instant of a life of a solider who is sentenced to death for his introspection on life and his hope of escaping the ordeal.

This is drawn out in suspense by the methodical writing style of the writer who draws out the moment into a story that we start believing that he has actually escaped.

By the time the reality hits us the, he is already dead.

Bierce's methodic writing style, with detailed descriptions in a quiet, slow, suspenseful manner, heightens the reader's sense of anticipation and immersion in the story.

The methodic writing style of Ambrose Bierce, characterized by detailed descriptions delivered in a quiet, slow, and suspenseful manner, serves to immerse the reader deeply into the narrative.

This style can create a palpable atmosphere that enhances the story's emotional impact and keeps the reader engaged. Bierce's attention to detail and his careful pacing allow readers to visualize scenes vividly and experience the tension and anticipation that the characters might be feeling.For example, in "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge," Bierce describes the soldiers' rifles in the "support" position with meticulous detail, creating a calm yet tense atmosphere. Similarly, the sound of the protagonist's watch ticking is described so vividly that it amplifies the suspense, making the reader acutely aware of each passing second and the protagonist's heightened perception in his final moments.

Answer:

tRUE

Explanation:

41TH PRESIDENTAL ELECTION!

Final answer:

The statement regarding the 2000 presidential election featuring Republican George W. Bush against Democrat Al Gore, the VP under Clinton, is true. This election was notable for its close and controversial outcome, which ultimately led to Bush's victory in the Electoral College, despite losing the popular vote to Gore.

Explanation:

The statement that in 2000, Republican George W. Bush ran against Al Gore, who had served as VP under Clinton, is true. The 2000 presidential election is a significant event in American history, as it concluded with a contentious outcome following a narrow Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore. Al Gore, as the Democratic nominee and former Vice President under Bill Clinton, faced George W. Bush, the Republican nominee and Governor of Texas. Despite the economic successes of the Clinton administration, the Bush campaign sought to capitalize on the moral controversies of the White House, while Gore aimed to distance himself from Clinton's scandals.

Although Al Gore had considerable experience and even led in early polls, George W. Bush's compassionate conservatism and promises of integrity in the White House helped him win the Electoral College. The election is remembered for its dramatic conclusion, hinging on the contentious Florida vote count and the subsequent Supreme Court ruling. This election has since been a topic of extensive study and discussion in American political history.

Answer:

Texas was originally a part of Mexico and had a greater population of its citizens in the area.

The most important set of actions which led to the war between US and Mexico include

U.S. Senate defeating the agreement of annexation with Texas

U.S. President John Tyler signing the Brown Resolution which offered Texas terms of annexation.

In response to passage of the Brown Resolution, Mexico's minister to the U.S., Juan N. Almonte, requests his passports, breaking off diplomatic relations between the two countries

Texas convention votes in favor of annexation to the United States

In Matamoros, Mexican General Francisco Mejia issues a proclamation threatening hostilities against U.S. troops

United States declares war against Mexico and US troops occupy Matamoros.

Answer: He began to see a need for national civil right laws.

Explanation: I hope this help you!!!!!!!

Answer:

He began to see a need for national civil rights laws

Explanation:

Women's rights activists linked their cause to principles of equality and natural rights from the Founding Fathers, asserting that rights like liberty and property should also apply to women. They referenced historical documents such as the Declaration of Independence in their fight, as seen with the 1848 Declaration of Sentiments demanding political equality and suffrage. They were also influenced by the egalitarian social roles of indigenous societies, like the Haudenosaunee.

Women's rights activists historically connected their cause to the principles of equality and natural rights espoused by the Founding Fathers. Abigail Adams's plea to 'Remember the ladies' during the Revolutionary discussions set an early precedent for this link. In echoing the language of the Declaration of Independence, activists argued that if 'all men are created equal' was a self-evident truth, this principle should logically also apply to women. Thus, notions like political equality, liberty, and the right to property were asserted to be as relevant to women as they were to men.

During the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848, activists, many of whom were also abolitionists, produced the Declaration of Sentiments which directly emulated the Declaration of Independence by including women in the assertion that 'all men and women are created equal.' This document catalogued the various ways in which women had been oppressed and, significantly, demanded suffrage—the right to vote—as essential to achieving equality.

In addition to referencing the ideals of the American Revolution, women's rights advocates were also inspired by indigenous societies, such as the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois), where women held significant social and political roles. The broader struggle for women's rights included fighting against institutionalized inequalities, as highlighted by activists like Betty Friedan who exposed gender-based wage disparities in the workforce. Thus, activists took a multifaceted approach that combined historical American principles with modern civil rights efforts to advocate for women's equality across social, political, and economic spheres.

I think it’s to limit the powers of the king

Answer:

Caesar Augustus

Explanation:

I Just know

Answer:

Dockworkers are duties including transferring cargo from ship to dock.

Explanation:

and securing ships and handling unloading set-up.

Answer:

divine right theory

evolutionary theory

The US democracy is based on the Social Contract Theory. The correct option is D.

According to the Social Contract Theory, there is an unspoken agreement or contract between the government and the people it governs that gives rise to its legitimacy. In accordance with this view, people voluntarily band together and agree to form a government in order to safeguard their natural rights and advance their interests.

The consent of the governed, in turn, is where the government draws its power and authority. The social contract idea had a significant impact on how US democratic values were formed.

Thus, the ideal selection is option D.

Learn more about the Social Contract Theory here:

https://brainly.com/question/12137843

#SPJ7

The difference are
Different in time
Different in extent
Administrative difference

Final answer:

Both the Mauryan and Gupta Empires in India unified smaller kingdoms, promoted culture, and had strong leadership. The Mauryan empire focused more on military and bureaucracy, and embraced Buddhism under Ashoka. In contrast, the Gupta Empire, while also militant, spent more time on culture and was predominantly Hindu.

Explanation:

The governments of the Mauryan and Gupta Empires in India share some similarities, along with several notable differences. Both empires tried to rule a diverse society by adopting certain measures. They merged various smaller kingdoms into a unified empire and reached their heights under exceptional leaders like Ashoka of the Mauryan empire, and Chandragupta of the Gupta empire. Both empires also promoted learning and culture, with Sanskrit becoming influential in the Gupta times.

However, there were some distinct differences as well. The Mauryan Empire had a stronger military focus, possessing a large and well-administrated army, navy, and cavalry division, also a widespread bureaucracy catering to industries like weaving, mining, shipbuilding, road construction, etc. On the flip side, the Gupta Empire, while also having a military, focused more on cultural growth and learning, leading to a flourishing in arts, literature, and science.

The Mauryan Empire, under Ashoka, embraced Buddhism and promoted harmony and compassionate governance. In contrast, the Gupta era was predominantly Hindu and is known as the 'Golden Age of Hinduism', although they were tolerant of other religions.

Learn more about Mauryan and Gupta Empires here:

https://brainly.com/question/502631

#SPJ2