Answer:
Fiscal and monetary policies are frequently used together to restore an economy to full employment output. For example, suppose an economy is experiencing a severe recession. One possible solution would be to engage in expansionary fiscal policy to increase aggregate demand.
Monetary policy refers to central bank activities that are directed toward influencing the quantity of money and credit in an economy. By contrast, fiscal policy refers to the government's decisions about taxation and spending. Both monetary and fiscal policies are used to regulate economic activity over time.
Explanation:
Fiscal policy and monetary policy are the two tools used by the state to achieve its macroeconomic objectives. While for many countries the main objective of fiscal policy is to increase the aggregate output of the economy, the main objective of the monetary policies is to control the interest and inflation rates. The IS/LM model is one of the models used to depict the effect of policy interactions on aggregate output and interest rates. The fiscal policies have a direct impact on the goods market and the monetary policies have a direct impact on the asset markets; since the two markets are connected to each other via the two macrovariables output and interest rates, the policies interact while influencing output and interest rates.
Traditionally, both the policy instruments were under the control of the national governments. Thus traditional analyses were made with respect to the two policy instruments to obtain the optimum policy mix of the two to achieve macroeconomic goals, lest the two policy tools be aimed at mutually inconsistent targets. But more recently, owing to the transfer of control with respect to monetary policy formulation to central banks, formation of monetary unions (like European Monetary Union formed via the Stability and Growth Pact), and attempts being made to form fiscal unions, there has been a significant structural change in the way in which fiscal and monetary policies interact.
There is a dilemma as to whether these two policies are complementary, or act as substitutes to each other for achieving macroeconomic goals. Policy makers are viewed as interacting as strategic substitutes when one policy maker's expansionary (contractionary) policies are countered by another policy maker's contractionary (expansionary) policies. For example: if the fiscal authority raises taxes or cuts spending, then the monetary authority reacts to it by lowering the policy rates and vice versa. If they behave as strategic complements, then an expansionary (contractionary) policy of one authority is met by expansionary (contractionary) policies of the other.
The issue of interaction and the policies being complements or substitutes for each other arises only when the authorities are independent of each other. But when the goals of one authority are made subservient to those of the other, then one authority solely dominates the policy making and no interaction worthy of analysis would arise. Also, fiscal and monetary policies interact only to the extent of influencing the final objective. So long as the objectives of one policy are not influenced by the other, there is no direct interaction between them.
The most effective combination to achieve a reduction in inflation involves contractionary fiscal policy, such as increasing taxes, and contractionary monetary policy, like selling government bonds. Both actions work towards reducing aggregate demand and alleviating inflationary pressure.
A reduction in inflation can best be achieved with a combination of contractionary fiscal and monetary policies. The correct option is A) Fiscal: increase taxes ; monetary: sell government bonds. Contractionary fiscal policies, such as increasing taxes, reduce the disposable income of individuals and businesses, which then leads to a decrease in consumption and investment, thus reducing aggregate demand. Likewise, contractionary monetary policies like selling government bonds tend to raise interest rates, which decreases the money supply, thereby reducing demand for goods and services.
Fiscal policies aimed at reducing inflation would include reductions in government purchases and transfer payments, and an increase in taxes. These measures shift the aggregate demand curve to the left, leading to a decrease in the general price level. In contrast, when the central bank sells government bonds, it takes money out of circulation, leading to higher interest rates, a curtailed borrowing activity, and a reduced aggregate demand.
-Question was incomplete the complete question is
"A reduction in inflation can best be achieved by which of the following combinations of fiscal and monetary policy?
A) Fiscal: increase taxes ; monetary: sell government bonds
B) Fiscal: decrease taxes ; monetary: lower margin requirements
C) Fiscal: decrease taxes ; monetary: lower margin requirements
D) Fiscal: decrease government spending ; monetary: lower discount rate
E) Fiscal: increase government spending; monetary: raise discount rate
With which country does the United States share a “special relationship,” a term used to describe the close political, economic, and cultural ties between the two countries?
A.
Australia
B.
Germany
C.
Great Britain
D.
France
Answer:
That would be C.) Great Britain.
Explanation:
EN QUE CAPITULO SE DESCRIBE LA PARTICIPACION DE LA CIUDADANIA EN EL GOBIERNO
Answer: Capitulo 2
PAPEL DE LOS CIUDADANOS EN EL PROCESO DE LA DEMOCRACIAY BUEN GOBIERNO
Explanation:
La participación ciudadana en el proceso político es una parte importante
de la democracia Las ideas y estrategias establecidas para mejorar la participación ciudadana en la gobernanza local se pueden observar en países de todo el mundo. Participación ciudadana en
La gobernanza local generalmente implica que los ciudadanos evalúen sus necesidades, participando en proyectos locales que les beneficiarían el monitoreo y la planificación presupuestaria. La participación ciudadana generalmente requiere una gran confianza y creencia
en sus copartícipes y en un sentido de creencia de que la participación puede marcar la diferencia.
"His Majesty’s Government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national homeland for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this objective, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country"
Answer:
Explanation: the British government favors the creation of a Jewish homeland
A woman is accused of murdering her brother. She claims that she stabbed her brother to release the evil spirits within his body. The excuse defense that would most likely be used at her trial is ________.
Disparate treatment may result from unintentional actions, such as setting certain hiring qualifications that may result in one race, religion, or sex, for example, being hired in disproportionately higher numbers than others.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Thats how life was!
How did the following Supreme Court Cases help establish the supremacy of federal over state laws?
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Answer:
Explanation:
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819):
Handled the 2nd BUS but the State of Maryland didn't like it, therefore the Supreme Court sues Maryland, to show that the Federal Government is supreme over State Governments.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): Can a State control Interstate Trade? Marshall said no, only congress has control (can be able to control )
Over Interstate Trade.
These was how these cases were handled this establishing that the Federal is very Supreme to all State Laws.
Which types of cases are NOT ELIGIBLE for trial by jury? (hint Trump)
Answer:parking ticket
Explanation:
4.) Becky Smith signed a note in the amount of $200,000 in favor of Country Home Loans, Inc., to obtain a loan to buy a house in Marrero, Louisiana. The note was endorsed "Pay to the order of ____________ without recourse Country Home Loans, Inc." Almost five years later Smith defaulted on the payments. The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) wanted to foreclose on the house and sell it to recover the balance due. Smith argued that the words "to
Becky Smith signed a note and she cannot own that property since the note was in country home loans and he defaulted payment under that law.
Explanation:
The Situation is defined as
Pursuant to U.C.C . § 3-203, transfer of instrument is done when a instrument is delivcered by a person other than the issuer for the purpose of giving it to the receiver based on the right to enforce the instrument. The rights are the rights as a holder in due course. However the transfer cannot acquire rights of a holder in due course if the transferee is engaged in fraud or illegality affecting the instrument.
When an instrument is transferred for value, a transferee do not become a holder bacause of lack of indorsement. Highly, when a transferor proposes to transfer less than the entire instrument, the negotiation of the instrument does not occur.
The finest response to the argument of Fannie mae's is because Becky Smith signed a note and she cannot own that property since the note was in country home loans and he defaulted payment under that law.
The endorsement 'without recourse' means that the endorser (Country Home Loans, Inc) does not assume responsibility if the note is defaulted. Thus Fannie Mae cannot seek payment from Country Home Loans, Inc. However, Fannie Mae can still foreclose on the house because it was used as collateral for the loan. Resolving such dispute involves contract law and the law of negotiable instruments.
Explanation:The clause 'Pay to the order of _______ without recourse Country Home Loans, Inc.' is a type of endorsement related to negotiable instruments like checks or promissory notes. When an instrument is endorsed 'without recourse', it means that the party endorsing it - in this case, Country Home Loans, Inc - is not accepting responsibility for whether the instrument is paid. If the note is defaulted on, the party holding the note cannot seek payment from the endorser, here Country Home Loans, Inc.
In the case of Becky Smith's defaulted loan, although Country Home Loans, Inc. endorsed the note 'without recourse' to Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae can still seek to foreclose on the home because the original loan was secured with the house as collateral. Should a legal dispute arise, the courts would apply the principles of contract law and negotiable instruments law to resolve the issues.
Learn more about Endorsement without recourse here:https://brainly.com/question/30822555
#SPJ11
How did the supreme court use its power of judicial review for the first time?
Answer: it was first used in 1803 in the case between Marbury Vs Madison.
Explanation: Judicial Review is the power the United States Supreme Court has to review laws and actions from Congress, and the President which helps to know whether such decisions or actions are constitutional. It adopts a check and balance system which the three arms of the federal government use to limit each other and ensure a balance of power. It was first used in 1803 in the case between
Marbury Vs Madison.
The Supreme Court first used its power of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison (1803), when it declared a congressional act unconstitutional. This case established the Court's role in the system of checks and balances and solidified the judiciary as a co-equal branch of government with significant oversight power.
Explanation:The Supreme Court's Power of Judicial Review
The Supreme Court used its power of judicial review for the first time in the landmark case Marbury v. Madison in 1803. This case affirmed the Court's role in the checks and balances system, by granting it the authority to declare legislative and executive actions unconstitutional if they do not align with the Constitution. The decision in Marbury v. Madison, delivered by Chief Justice John Marshall, declared a Congressional act - the Judiciary Act of 1789, which had given the Court the power to issue writs of mandamus - to be unconstitutional, thereby nullifying it.
This precedent-setting case established the Supreme Court's authority to review and invalidate government actions that it deemed contrary to the Constitution. While the Constitution does not explicitly grant this power to the judiciary, the ruling in Marbury v. Madison formed the basis for judicial oversight over federal and state legislation, a power that remains central to the Court's function. The importance of this case cannot be overstated, as it solidified the judiciary as a co-equal branch of government, with the power to enforce constitutional boundaries.
Since the Marbury v. Madison case, the power of judicial review has expanded, allowing not only the Supreme Court but also lower federal courts and state courts to review and possibly overturn laws and governmental actions that violate the Constitution. However, this power is exercised sparingly; the Court has struck down a relatively small number of national and state laws in its history.
Why do you think the Constitution was ratified only after the provision for amendments was added?
State courts are the final decision-makers with issues dealing with of state laws and constitutions. True or False
Answer:
false
Explanation:
When John Lacey's car was stolen, he lodged a complaint with the police. The police were able to trace the car to a professional auto thief and returned it to John. When John got his car back, he realized that the thief had installed a new engine, changed the upholstery, and put a new stereo player in his car. The value of John's car is said to have undergone a(n) ________.
a. accession
b. arraignment
c. bailment
d. lien
Answer:
a. Accession
The addition to personal property
Explanation:
True or false?Bianca, a fraud examiner for the Levine Corporation, a U.S. corporation, suspects that an employee of another U.S. company has committed a fraud scheme against Levine Corporation. Although Bianca has not obtained the suspect employee’s consent to access their personal credit report, she may access the report based on an exception set out in the U.S. Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Okay, let us first understand what the U.S. Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) is. The U.S. Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) is a law that serves to protect the personal information of citizens' privacy on credit reports.
In order to get access to someone else credit reports; (1) one has to either ask for the person's consent or (2). If one is an employer and one is conducting a research on his or employer through a third party(if the employee is a suspect of several misconducts). This is the exception that was amended in the U.S. Fair Credit Reporting Act.
So, Bianca can not obtain such infomation because the employee work for another company which does not concern Bianca.
Federal appeals courts are also known as circuit courts. True or False
Answer:
The statement is true.Explanation:
In U.S, circuit courts are also known as federal appeal courts. They are the intermediate courts of appeal in the judicial structure of the .country.A court of appeals or circuit court hears and reviews appeals from the district court decisions that have already been heard.There are 13 appellate courts or circuit courts in total and they are also called the U.S. Courts of Appeals. They have jurisdiction all over the country and may hear appeals of special cases such as patent case, international trade case, etc.Where does locke’s two treatises of government say that governments get their start?
Answer:
From the state of nature.Explanation:
In John Locke's 'Two Treatise of Government', he wrote the state of nature is the basis of how governments emerged. In his state of nature, there is a law that governs us all. It is the law of reason.It is through this law that humans started to understand the need of an authority to govern them all and to protect their interests.Subsequently, this authority became into a legitimate government in time.John Locke firmly believed that every man can lively freely and equally based on reason and not under the authority of any superior king or man.In Locke's 'Two Treatises of Government', he suggests that governments begin when people in a state of nature agree to form a government. This involves transferring some of their natural rights in exchange for the protection of their remaining rights.
Explanation:In John Locke's Two Treatises of Government, he proposes that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed, essentially making government a social contract. Locke describes the start of governments in the second treatise, where he speaks of a state of nature where people have natural rights such as life, liberty, and property. When people agree to form a government, they are transferring some of their natural rights in exchange for the protection of their remaining rights. Hence, government gets its start from the consent of the individuals that it governs.
Learn more about Locke's Two Treatises of Government
https://brainly.com/question/4141451
#SPJ3
If the Mortgage/Deed of Trust contains the phrase “See Exhibit A” in the section of the document containing the property’s legal description:
According to the legal description of the property, Exhibits A is a substitute who will come later.
An exhibit is a piece of crucial information that is added to the conclusion of a paper so that the viewer may get a complete picture of the text.
When an exhibition is connected to a contract, it is commonly referred to as the body. In nature, an exhibition is always genuine. When attaching an evidence, the person must justify why he or she has been doing so to the jury.Learn more:https://brainly.com/question/13084801?referrer=searchResults
Final answer:
If a Mortgage/Deed of Trust contains the phrase “See Exhibit A” in the section with the property's legal description, it means that the detailed legal description of the property can be found in an attached exhibit.
Explanation:
In the context of a Mortgage/Deed of Trust, if the document contains the phrase “See Exhibit A” in the section that contains the property’s legal description, it means that the detailed legal description of the property can be found in a separate exhibit attached to the mortgage or deed.
The purpose of referencing an exhibit is to provide a more comprehensive and specific description of the property, as it may include details such as metes and bounds, lot dimensions, and any easements or restrictions that apply.
By referring to an exhibit, lenders and borrowers can ensure that the legal description is accurate and complete, which is crucial for the validity of the mortgage or deed.
Preventing future criminal acts describes which purpose of punishment?
Since, the options have not been given, the question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows:
Preventing future criminal acts describes which purpose of punishment?
A. Containment
B. Retribution
C. Deterrence
D. Rehabilitation
C. Deterrence
Answer: C. Deterrence
Explanation:
Deterrence is an act of discouraging the action or event harmful to other individuals or the public. It discourages the wrongdoer or anyone intend to harm other person or property for own benefit. The future criminal acts can be prevented by creating a threat of retaliation or by penalizing the act. The punishment must be severe according to the act to deter criminal acts.
Which states passed legislation to protest the alien and sedition acts
Answer: the kentucky and virginia resolutions
Explanation:
All of these are describing which political body? A) Democratic Party Caucus B) Committee on Ways and Means C) Republican Policy Committee D) Committee on Standards of Official Conduct
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Which supreme court decision had nine different opinions written by the justices?
Answer:
The answer is furman v georgia ( fact as it happened in 1972)
Explanation:
Which supreme court decision had nine different opinions written by the justices? The answer is furman v georgia ( fact as it happened in 1972)
Answer:
The answer is furman v georgia ( fact as it happened in 1972)
Explanation:
Which supreme court decision had nine different opinions written by the justices? The answer is furman v georgia ( fact as it happened in 1972)
Which of the following is an example of a foreign policy issue?
A.
whether or not the United States should maintain its current troop commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
B.
whether or not the federal government should deploy the National Guard to areas that are affected by a natural disaster
C.
whether or not the United States military should increase troop levels using selective services policies currently in place
D.
whether or not vegetables grown in the United States should carry labels identifying the state in which they were grown
Answer: B
Explanation:
because a natural disaster can happen anywhere
Explain whether these situations violated the First - Fourth Amendments - which one, and why or why not.
1. HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS NOT ALLOWED TO ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
Answer:
first
Explanation:
in the bill of right the first amendment states we as free americans have the right to Assemble- freedom to assemble in public places, PEACEFULLY
Project management boils down to asking which questions? Select an answer: How will you know when you're done? And how well did the project go? What's your plan? What problem are you solving? And how are you going to solve it? all of these answers
Answer:
D. All of these answers.
Explanation:
Project management involves an array of questions spanning from identifying the problem and planning the solution to evaluating the project upon completion. Therefore, the correct answer to the question, 'Project management boils down to asking which questions?' is 'All of these answers'.
Explanation:Project management essentially asks multiple key questions. These include: 'What problem are you solving?', 'How are you going to solve it?', and 'What's your plan?' Once these aspects are covered, it proceeds to other important questions such as 'How will you know when you're done?' and 'How well did the project go?'. Therefore, the correct answer is 'All of these answers', as effective project management is determined by how these questions are addressed and answered.
Learn more about Project Management here:https://brainly.com/question/31822111
#SPJ2
Evaluate the extent to which the ratification of the united states constitution fostered political change in the united states from 1777 to 1800.
Answer:
Explanation:
The ratification of the constitution began when efforts were made to turn the constitution over to the state legislature for review through the appointed state conventions. State conventions were the instruments of ratification. The ratification of the constitution is important because of the essential provisions of the proposed new government. It created avenue for proponents and opponents to discuss and make their opinions before the citizenry. When New Hampshire ratified the constitution, it became an official document of the US government. The constitution proposed a newly formed nation made up of independent states, and the American leaders had to focus on creating a new form of government(centralized government). After ratification, the first Presidential election was set to take place from Monday, December 15, 1788, to Saturday, January 10, 1789. The Congress was revised to reflect the system of the constitution. The Funding Act was restored to enable the Federal Government handle war debts. The Federal Government assumed more political powers and worked towards stabilizing the American economy. The Bill of Rights became a part of the constitution in 1791.
The ratification of the United States Constitution brought about significant political changes in the United States between 1777 and 1800, leading to a stronger centralized government while navigating between Federalist and Anti-Federalist views, and the practical challenges of implementing a new system of governance.
Explanation:Evaluation of Political Change After Constitution Ratification Between 1777-1800The ratification of the United States Constitution significantly fostered political change between 1777 and 1800, marking the transition into the Federalist Era. The new framework established a centralized authority, addressing the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and giving rise to a government that was more national than federal. Despite the innovative changes, the full implementation of the Constitution's ideals proved challenging, with persistent disagreements about the role of the central government and the scope of democracy at the state level.
Federalists, led by figures like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, advocated for a strong central government to address foreign and domestic policy issues more effectively. The call for a 'more perfect union' focused on counterbalancing the 'excesses of democracy' seen under the earlier system of government. Meanwhile, Anti-Federalists raised concerns about the potential for government tyranny and the loss of state's rights. The solution to these disputes partly came with the promise of a Bill of Rights to safeguard individual freedoms, persuading enough states to ratify the Constitution and bring it into effect.
The economic crises, such as the Shays' Rebellion, helped to highlight the inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation, and these events spurred political leaders towards crafting and ratifying a new Constitution. The new federal system began to reshape American political culture but was faced with varying opinions and oppositions on its implementation. It was through the compromise and the realization that without the unity and strength provided by the Constitution, the republic might crumble, that the new government structure was fully established.
Learn more about United States Constitution here:https://brainly.com/question/14276258
#SPJ3