Answer:
Talking about the conversation with a compliance officer of his firm Accept unsolicited trades from costumers in the company's stockExplanation:
The agent listened to another company's employee talking on the phone about confidential information, that is, private information that the agent should not be listening to, but he has heard and can use it to his company's advantage. Since no one knows that the agent has this information, he can talk about the conversation he has heard with a compliance officer at his company, and he can accept unsolicited dealings from customers on the company's stock.
In order to police the profession, the state legislature has just passed a law permitting the State Plumbers’ Association the power to hold hearings to determine whether a particular plumber has violated the plumbing code of ethics, written by the association. Sam, a plumber, objects to the convening of a hearing when he is accused by Roger, a fellow plumber, of acting unethically by soliciting business from Roger’s customers. Sam goes to court, seeking to enjoin the association’s disciplinary committee from holding the hearing. What is the result? How would you argue Sam’s case? The association’s case?
Answer and Explanation:
Charging a fellow plumber that he is acting dishonest in removing his business is really an infringement according to the arrangements of the state council. Each body has equivalent chance to work and any nobody has the option to blame an other individual in the business. Requesting business is right according to the law. It is up to the clients who they decided for the administrations. It isn't viewed as dishonest.
If the Rodger's service are great, at that point his clients won't leave him for better service regardless of whether somebody like Sam requests business. Since, Rodger's service are not acceptable, his clients are dismissing for better benefits. What's more, Sam is at a preferred position. In business, it is right to offer decisions to the clients. What's more, it is under the tact of the clients on who they pick. Clients reserve the option to pick the best.
Any business man can advance his service but In any case, he can't support his costumers saying they can't go else where, neither one of the hes should utilize unscrupulous intends to keep them from not going else where.
The outcome will be, Rodger will be charged for disregarding the standard of mishandling a kindred handyman. I would contend Sam's case by saying that requesting isn't unscrupulous. It is a sort of an oral advancement for the service one is managing in. Along these lines, Sam requesting Rodger's clients isn't considered as dishonest.
In the affiliation, each body will have a lot of clients, and each body has the option to morally request about themselves and their business. Nobody can't limit another person's the same old thing. Clients reserve the privilege to pick what they need and whom they ought to pick.
Sam could argue against the State Plumbers' Association hearing by questioning the impartiality and potential conflict of interest, while the association would defend their regulatory role, expertise, and established legal precedents.
In the case where Sam, a plumber, objects to a hearing held by the State Plumbers' Association to determine if he has violated the plumbing code of ethics, several arguments could be presented for both Sam and the association.
Sam's argument might be grounded in the principles of due process, questioning the impartiality of the committee, especially if it includes his competitors, and he might argue that such delegation of authority to a professional association infringes upon his right to a fair trial. Sam could claim that this situation presents a conflict of interest and that the hearing might not be conducted in an unbiased manner, seeing as the complaint comes from a direct competitor.
On the other hand, the association's case could be built around the principle that professional bodies are often granted the authority to regulate their own members to maintain ethical standards and public trust. They might assert that the association is best suited to understand and judge industry-specific conduct, emphasizing established precedents where such arrangements have existed and functioned effectively in other professions like medicine and law. The association could further argue that their process includes mechanisms to ensure fairness and impartiality, and that their decisions are still subject to judicial review, preserving the rights of the accused.
A mayoral election is about to be held in Bay City. One of the candidates is Donita Estrella, and her supporters wish to post campaign signs on streetlights and utility posts. A Bay City ordinance prohibits the posting of signs on public property. The purpose of the ordinance is to improve the appearance of the city. Estrella’s supporters con-tend that the ordinance violates their rights to free speech. What factors might a court consider in determining the con-stitutionality of this ordinance? (
In determining the constitutionality of the ordinance, a court would consider factors such as whether it is the least restrictive means to achieve its objective if it is content-neutral, and relevant precedents and case law related to free speech.
Explanation:In determining the constitutionality of the ordinance that prohibits the posting of signs on public property, a court would consider several factors. First, the court would assess whether the ordinance is the least restrictive means available to achieve its stated objective of improving the appearance of the city. If there are alternative measures that would serve the same purpose without unduly infringing on free speech rights, the court may find the ordinance unconstitutional. Second, the court would evaluate whether the ordinance is content neutral. If the ordinance only prohibits certain types of signs based on their subject matter, it may be deemed unconstitutional. Finally, the court would consider any relevant precedents and case law related to free speech rights and restrictions.
what is the number one draft person in social government
1-Donald trump
2-Barack Obama
3-Hillery Clinton
Please help on this question?
Answer:
trump
Explanation:
im not sure about this
Answer:
Currently, the number one draft person in social government is Donald Trump.
Explanation:
Donald John Trump is the 45th President of the United States. He won the presidential election as the Republican Party candidate in November 2016 and took office in January 2017.
Before becoming president, Trump became known as a corporate executive, billionaire, writer and television personality. He started his career with his father, real estate mogul Fred Trump. Later, Trump took over the company's leadership, which was renamed Trump Organization. During his business career, Trump has been active in the real estate, casino and hotel industries.
In 2015, he announced he would seek the Republican Party's presidential nomination in the 2016 election. He reached the required number of MPs in May 2016. He won the 2016 presidential election against Hillary Clinton, and swore in on January 20, 2017.
Trump is predominantly a right-wing conservative and a populist. In his election campaign, he promised, among other things, to prioritize US interests, reduce illegal immigration, reduce taxes and increase jobs.
The texas legislature recently passed a law that gives retailers the right to ask customers using credit or debit cards to show a photo id to prove their identity. What type of law does this represent?
Answer:
Statutory
Explanation:
Statutory law is a type of law that is written and passed by a legislature (national, state or local). This term is used to distinguish it from oral or customary law, as well as from laws promulgated by the executive or the judiciary. In this example, the law that was passed is statutory law, because it was passed by the Texas legislature.
4. Robert worked as a bus driver for Greyhound. One night the bus he was driving rear ended a tractor trailer. Seven passengers on the bus were injured. The passengers filed negligence lawsuit against Greyhound, the passengers, as Plaintiffs, alleged Greyhound allowed Robert to drive the bus when they knew his vision was impaired. The Plaintiffs want Robert to undergo a vision test. Robert refuses. Can the court order Robert to have a vision test? Explain.
Answer:
Yes he should go take a eye test
Explanation:
The court can do whatever the seem to deem well so they can ask him to got take a vision test so he doesn't have any problems with is eyes even though he crashed he may have night time eye problems