Beginning in 1995, most countries in the European Union started to switch to a common currency. The values of different European currencies were linked to the euro. Countries in the European Union could then trade without converting currency. Why would adopting a common currency be helpful for European traders?

European traders can import more goods because the euro is strong.
Poorer countries in Europe became richer because their currency was converted to the euro.
Wages will be the same in each European country because everyone is being paid in the same currency.
Exchange between European countries is easier because they are using the same currency.

General John J. Pershing's decision to keep U.S. forces independent played a pivotal role in Allied success in World War I, bolstered the U.S's stance of isolationism, and preserved a distinct American military identity which was influential in future international engagements.

General John J. Pershing's decision to maintain the U.S. Forces as autonomous from the European armies had significant effects on both the U.S and Europe. One primary consequence was the American Expeditionary Forces' contribution to the collective Allied success in World War I. The U.S. forces, fresh and undiminished, provided a morale boost and extra manpower that bolstered the Allies' strength and contributed to the final victories of 1918, pushing Germany to the brink of collapse.

Another significant impact was solidifying the United States' stance of isolationism. Not integrating with European forces embodied this stance, thereby maintaining America's image as an independent power with the consequent ability to make decisions without needing to consider other nations' obligations or politics.

Lastly, Pershing's decision had the effect of preserving a distinct American military identity, which paved the way for future international engagements. This military identity evolved in World War II when the U.S. ended its isolationist policy and actively engaged on the world stage, becoming a global superpower.

https://brainly.com/question/20049299

#SPJ12

Final answer:

A government-enacted rule is known as a law, which forms part of the rule of law, a principle ensuring that all, including government officials, are subject to the same laws and legal principles.

Explanation:

A government rule that is made is often referred to as a law. This law is a system of rules created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior, with the precise definition of law being a matter of longstanding debate. In the context of a democratic society, these laws are enacted by a legislature and require governmental agencies, individuals, and businesses to follow specific legal principles. The concept of the rule of law emphasizes that all members of society, including government officials, are subject to and governed by these established laws, ensuring equality and fairness under the law.

The rule of law is a foundational element of a fair and just society; it maintains that laws must be followed and applied equally to everyone, preventing the arbitrary use of power. Through this system, decisions are made based on pre-established legal principles rather than personal whims, ensuring that everyone is treated equally before the law.

Imagine drawing a political cartoon depicting the new nation's delegates under heavy British rule restrictions, symbolizing the potential consequences if the American Revolution had failed. This idea is contextualized through historical examples and understanding the conditions of the time.

The request to draw a political cartoon about the potential outcome for the delegates of the new nation if they had failed to win their freedom from Great Britain is a thought-provoking idea. We would need to consider the historical background and context to create this image. Given the reality of the time, the delegates would likely have faced severe consequences if the revolution had failed, much like the struggles faced by American farmers and merchants represented in the 1807 political cartoon lampooning Thomas Jefferson's Embargo Act.

In this imagined scenario, we could visualize the delegates facing heavy taxation without representation, sharply restricted trade, denied basic rights like trial by jury, and with restricted self-governance - all points raised by Thomas Jefferson against the British monarch in the Declaration of Independence. They would perhaps be depicted with their hands tied, symbolizing a lack of freedom and autonomy, while a figure representing King George III could be seen imposing these restrictions. The caption could read, 'The Chains ofbritish Rule: A Revolution Thwarted'.

This conceptualization draws on the imagery and symbolism seen in real political cartoons of that period like 'A Truce not a Compromise', which represented the lack of consensus after the election of 1876. It also considers the historical facts and circumstances surrounding the struggle for independence and the potential perils that might have awaited the new nation's delegates if the rebellion had failed.

https://brainly.com/question/26395368

#SPJ11

Answer:

Brown v. Board of Education

Explanation:

The European reaction to the Monroe Doctrine was muted as European nations were preoccupied and recognized the limited U.S. military power. Britain's navy and trade interests inadvertently enforced the doctrine, while Latin American leaders placed greater trust in British support than the American proclamation.

The European reaction to the Monroe Doctrine, announced in President James Monroe's annual message to Congress in 1823, was generally muted.

The doctrine was a statement originated by Secretary of State John Quincy Adams suggesting that future European colonization would not be welcome in the Western Hemisphere and that American and European political systems were different, thus neither should meddle in the affairs of the other. While most Americans celebrated this pronouncement, European nations, busy with their own concerns and recognizing the limited military power of the United States, did not challenge the doctrine immediately.

However, the impact of the Monroe Doctrine became evident over the years, exemplified later when Great Britain officially recognized Gran Colombia and the role of British influence in deterring Spain's attempts to regain its colonies became more influential than the U.S. proclamation.

In 1954 when the NAACP filed the lawsuit Brown Vs. Board of Education their goal was B) to end segregation in public education. The NAACP or National Association for the Advancement of Colored People believed that it was unconstitutional for schools to segregate black and white kids. Thus when the court case was won in their favor it was considered a landmark win for the rights of all US citizens.

The reason why NAACP filed Brown v. Board of Education was to end segregation in public education.

Brown v. Board of Education was a case that ended up in the Supreme Court as a result of segregation in the public school system.

The Supreme Court ruled in this case that segregation was against the Constitution because students were not being equally protected under the law.

Find out more on Brown v. Board of Education at https://brainly.com/question/9857823.

#SPJ2

Answer:

C. Allowed Midwestern families to raise and maintain production

Explanation:

The reaper and steel plow made it accesible for small families to grow and harvest crops with their limited budget to be able to afford tools that made the harvest and plantation of crops easier by allowing them to break down the eart easier with less time of work, and to do the same at harvest, using the reaper to harvest crops on time.

tool to help solve corrupt special interests should be the right answer

The correct answer would be: President Jackson viewed the National Bank as a corrupt organization that was damaging the nation's interests. Andrew Jackson served as the 7th President of the United States from 1829 until 1933. When he became President, one of the first actions Jackson took in office was to open an investigation on the National Bank's policies due to his belief that the Bank represented the high class business men's interests against the interests of middle class citizens.  In 1833, the President announced that the government was going to stop using the National Bank and issued an order to have removed from the Bank all of the Federal funds. This conflict was known as the "bank war".

The net work done on the car as it travels 20 meters forward with a net force of 200 N is 4000 joules.

The question is asking about the concept of work in physics, which is calculated as the product of force and distance when force is applied in the direction of motion. In this scenario, a force of 300 N is applied to a car moving forward, and a frictional force of 100 N opposes its motion. The net force on the car is therefore 300 N - 100 N = 200 N in the direction of the motion. The car travels a distance of 20 m in the direction of the net force. The work done on the car can be calculated using the formula work = net force x distance.

To calculate the net work done on the car:
Work = Net Force x Distance
Work = (300 N - 100 N) x 20 m
Work = 200 N x 20 m
Work = 4000 J

Therefore, the net work done on the car is 4000 joules (J).

Train metaphors are used to describe the flow, coordination, and efficiency of systems or processes.

Train metaphors are commonly used when describing systems or processes that involve movement, efficiency, and coordination. In the context of transportation, train metaphors can be used to highlight the interconnectedness of different parts of a system and the need for smooth and efficient operation. For example, one-way train metaphors are used is to describe the flow of information or resources in a system, emphasizing the importance of each component working together towards a common goal.

Another way train metaphors are used is to emphasize the need for coordination and timing in order to avoid delays or disruptions, much like a well-coordinated train system.

https://brainly.com/question/29829242

#SPJ3

Answer: True

Explanation:

The correct answer is option A. The statement that is not true regarding World War I's impact on the Middle East is American plans to take control of the region's oil were blocked by the other Allies.

To determine which statement is not true regarding World War I's impact on the Middle East, we need to evaluate the historical accuracy of each statement:

A. There is no substantial historical evidence to suggest that America had plans to take control of the region's oil during World War I, and thus no significant conflict with other Allies over this issue during the war. The primary players in the Middle East oil interests were Britain and France. The major American involvement in Middle Eastern oil came later, particularly in the 1920s and beyond.

B. This statement is mostly accurate, though the generally accepted figure for the Armenian Genocide is around 1.5 million Armenians. The Ottoman Empire did carry out mass killings of Armenians during the war, justifying it with claims of disloyalty and collaboration with the enemy.

C. This statement is true. During World War I, the British, through the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, promised the Sharif of Mecca, Hussein bin Ali, independence for the Arab lands in return for his support against the Ottoman Empire.

D. This statement is true. The Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 was a secret treaty between Britain and France, with assent from Russia, that planned to divide the Ottoman Empire's territories in the Middle East between themselves after the war.

The complete question is:

Which one of the following statements is not true regarding World War I's impact on the Middle East?

A. American plans to take control of the region's oil were blocked by the other Allies

B. Ottoman Turks massacred as many as 2 million Armenians, claiming they were disloyal

C. Arabs believed the Allies promised independence for their revolt against the Ottoman Turks

D. Britain, France, & Russia divided the region for themselves in the Sykes-Picot Agreement

The correct percentage of students choosing skateboarding is 20%. Therefore, the answer is D) none of these.

To determine the percentage of total students who chose skateboarding, we need to first understand the context provided. Since there is no specific data given, let's consider a hypothetical scenario where a survey was conducted among students, asking them about their preferred recreational activities.

Let's say the survey listed various activities including skateboarding.

let's assume the survey results show that out of 100 students surveyed, 20 chose skateboarding as their preferred activity.

To calculate the percentage, divide the number of students who chose skateboarding by the total number of students surveyed, and then multiply by 100:

(20 / 100) x 100 = 20%

So, the correct answer would be option B) 20%.

Therefore, none of the provided options match the correct percentage of students who chose skateboarding. The correct percentage is 20%. Hence, the correct answer is D) none of these.

A court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses.

Answer:

For my answers, the above answer was wrong.

the answer I got was "a federal judge rules that newspapers may be censored during an emergency despite earlier courts declaring this practice unconstitutional."

Explanation:

Answer:  The correct answer is : A. Trade between states would increase.

Explanation:  The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of Gibbons, where interstate commerce would be regulated by Congress. But what was thought at the beginning was to develop a national network of steamboats led by a monopoly, because there was much potential in the navigation with this type of ships, competitors emerged that stated that the power of trade was the federal government. This is how the case of Thomas Gibbons - Aaron Ogden originated, where Gibbons was one of the competitors.