Answer:
a) 1/6
b) 3/8
Step-by-step explanation:
Even i struggle with fractions but im sure you will get it one day (✿◡‿◡)
how many five dollar bills make two hundred dollars
Answer:
40
Step-by-step explanation:
200/5 = 40
Answer:
20$
Step-by-step explanation:
10, five dollar bills make 50 so 20 five dollar bills make 100$
Mr. Hopkins is building a sandbox for his children. It would cost $228 for the sand if he builds a sandbox with dimensions 9 ft by 6 ft. If Mr. Hopkins decides to increase the size to 1312 ft by 8 ft but keep the same depth of sand, how much would the sand cost
Answer:
[tex]\$456[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct question is
Mr. Hopkins is building a sandbox for his children. It would cost $228 for the sand if he builds a sandbox with dimensions 9 ft by 6 ft. If Mr. Hopkins decides to increase the size to 13 1/2 ft by 8 ft but keep the same depth of sand, how much would the sand cost
step 1
Find the unit rate of the cost per square foot
Divide the total cost by the area
[tex]\frac{228}{9*6}=\$\frac{38}{9}\ per\ square\ foot[/tex]
step 2
Find the area of the increased sandbox
we have
[tex]L=13\frac{1}{2}=13.5\ ft[/tex]
[tex]W=8\ ft[/tex]
The area is equal to
[tex]A=(13.5)(8)=108\ ft^2[/tex]
step 3
Find the cost of the new sandbox
Multiply the area by the cost per square foot
[tex]108(\frac{38}{9})=\$456[/tex]
A journal article reports that a sample of size 5 was used as a basis for calculating a 95% CI for the true average natural frequency (Hz) of delaminated beams of a certain type. The resulting interval was (229.266, 233.002). You decide that a confidence level of 99% is more appropriate than the 95% level used. What are the limits of the 99% interval? [Hint: Use the center of the interval and its width to determine x and s.] (Round your answers to three decimal places.)
Answer:
[tex]Lower = 231.134- 3.098=228.036[/tex]
[tex]Upper = 231.134+ 3.098=234.232[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Previous concepts
A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".
The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.
Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".
[tex]\bar X[/tex] represent the sample mean for the sample
[tex]\mu[/tex] population mean (variable of interest)
s represent the sample standard deviation
n=5 represent the sample size
Solution to the problem
The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:
[tex]\bar X \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex] (1)
And for this case we know that the 95% confidence interval is given by:
[tex] \bar X=\frac{233.002 +229.266}{2}= 231.134[/tex]
And the margin of error is given by:
[tex] ME = \frac{233.002 -229.266}{2}= 1.868[/tex]
And the margin of error is given by:
[tex] ME= t_{\alpha/2} \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]
The degrees of freedom are given by:
[tex] df = n-1 = 5-1=4[/tex]
And the critical value for 95% of confidence is [tex] t_{\alpha/2}= 2.776[/tex]
So then we can find the deviation like this:
[tex] s = \frac{ME \sqrt{n}}{t_{\alpha/2}}[/tex]
[tex] s = \frac{1.868* \sqrt{5}}{2.776}= 1.506[/tex]
And for the 99% confidence the critical value is: [tex] t_{\alpha/2}= 4.604[/tex]
And the margin of error would be:
[tex] ME = 4.604 *\frac{1.506}{\sqrt{5}}= 3.098[/tex]
And the interval is given by:
[tex]Lower = 231.134- 3.098=228.036[/tex]
[tex]Upper = 231.134+ 3.098=234.232[/tex]
The limits of the 99% confidence interval (CI) for the true average natural frequency (Hz) of delaminated beams are (228.555, 233.713).
To find the 99% confidence interval, we need to understand that the width of a confidence interval is determined by the standard deviation of the sample, the sample size, and the confidence level.
The formula for a confidence interval for the mean when the population standard deviation is unknown (which is likely the case here, as it is not specified) is given by:
[tex]\[ \text{CI} = \bar{x} \pm t_{\frac{\alpha}{2}, n-1} \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \][/tex]
First, we need to find the sample mean which is the center of the given 95% CI.
The width of the CI is the difference between the upper and lower limits. For the 95% CI, the width is:
[tex]\[ \text{Width}_{95\%} = 233.002 - 229.266 = 3.736 \][/tex]
Since the 95% CI is symmetric around the sample mean, the margin of error (MOE) for the 95% CI is half of the width:
[tex]\[ \text{MOE}_{95\%} = \frac{\text{Width}_{95\%}}{2} = \frac{3.736}{2} = 1.868 \][/tex]
The 95% CI can be represented as:
[tex]\[ \text{CI}_{95\%} = \bar{x} \pm \text{MOE}_{95\%} \][/tex]
Finally, the limits of the 99% CI are found by adding and subtracting this MOE from the sample mean:
[tex]\[ \text{Upper limit}_{99\%} = \bar{x} + \text{MOE}_{99\%} = 231.134 + 3.152 \approx 233.713 \][/tex]
Therefore, the 99% confidence interval for the true average natural frequency (Hz) of delaminated beams is (228.555, 233.713).
What should you always check for when solving rational equations?
Answer-
You should always check the solution is a rational equation. It would be easier to get an answer... Idk if this helps, but thats what I was taught>>>
Step-by-step explanation:
A television camera is positioned 4000 ft from the base of a rocket launching pad. The angle of elevation of the camera has to change at the correct rate in order to keep the rocket in sight. Also, the mechanism for focusing the camera has to take into account the increasing distance from the camera to the rising rocket. Let's assume the rocket rises vertically and its speed is 1000 ft/s when it has risen 3000 ft. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)
(a) How fast is the distance from the television camera to the rocket changing at that moment?
(b) If the television camera is always kept aimed at the rocket, how fast is the camera's angle of elevation changing at that same moment?
Answer:
a) The distance from the television camera to the rocket is changing at that moment at a speed of
600 ft/s
b) the camera's angle of elevation is changing at that same moment at a rate of
0.16 rad/s = 9.16°/s
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a trigonometry relation type of problem.
An image of when the rocket is 3000 ft from the ground is presented in the attached image.
Let the angle of elevation be θ
The height of the rocket at any time = h
The distance from the camera to the rocket = d
a) At any time, d, h and the initial distance from the camera to the rocket can be related using the Pythagoras theorem.
d² = h² + 4000²
Take the time derivative of both sides
(d/dt) (d²) = (d/dt) [h² + 4000²]
2d (dd/dt) = 2h (dh/dt) + 0
At a particular instant,
h = 3000 ft,
(dh/dt) = 1000 ft/s
d can be obtained using the same Pythagoras theorem
d² = h² + 4000² (but h = 3000 ft)
d² = 3000² + 4000²
d = 5000 ft
2d (dd/dt) = 2h (dh/dt) + 0
(dd/dt) = (h/d) × (dh/dt)
(dd/dt) = (3000/5000) × (1000)
(dd/dt) = 600 ft/s
b) If the television camera is always kept aimed at the rocket, how fast is the camera's angle of elevation changing at that same moment?
At any moment in time, θ, h and the initial distance of the camera from the base of the rocket are related through the trigonometric relation
Tan θ = (h/4000) = 0.00025h
Taking the time derivative of both sides
(d/dt) (Tan θ) = (d/dt) (0.00025h)
(Sec² θ) (dθ/dt) = 0.00025 (dh/dt)
At the point where h = 3000 ft, we can calculate the corresponding θ at that point
Tan θ = (3000/4000)
θ = tan⁻¹ (0.75) = 0.6435 rad
(Sec² θ) (dθ/dt) = 0.00025 (dh/dt)
(Sec² 0.6435) (dθ/dt) = 0.00025 (1000)
1.5625 (dθ/dt) = 0.25
(dθ/dt) = (0.25/1.5625) = 0.16 rad/s
Hope this Helps!!!
The rate of change of the hypotenuse distance and the camera's angle of elevation can be calculated using the principles of trigonometry and differentials. The rates derive from the Pythagorean theorem and the derivatives of trigonometric functions, respectively.
Explanation:This question relates to the concepts of trigonometry and differential calculus. We can see the camera, the rocket and the launch pad as forming a right triangle: the distance from the camera to the rocket is the hypotenuse, the distance from the camera to the launch pad is one leg (adjacent to the angle of elevation) and the distance that the rocket has risen is the other leg (opposite to the angle of elevation).
(a) To find how fast the distance from the camera to the rocket is changing, we can use the Pythagorean theorem (a² + b² = c²). Here, a = 4000 ft, b = 3000 ft, so, c = sqrt((4000)² + (3000)²). The derivative dc/dt (rate of change of c) when b = 3000 ft and db/dt = 1000 ft/s will provide the answer.
(b) To find how fast the camera's angle of elevation (let's symbolize it by θ) is changing, we use the concept of derivatives of trigonometric functions, specifically the tangent, which is defined as opposite (b) over adjacent (a), or tan(θ) = b/a. Then, we can compute dθ/dt using implicit differentiation when b = 3000 ft and db/dt = 1000 ft/s.
Learn more about Differential Calculus here:https://brainly.com/question/32034253
#SPJ11
Samuel is at the top of the tower and will ride down a zip line to a lower tower. The total vertical drop of the zip line is 40ft. The zip line's angle of elevation from the lower tower is 11.5° . To the nearest tenth, what is the horizontal distance between the towers?
Answer:
196.6 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Draw the right triangle formed by the zip-line. Use SOH-CAH-TOA to write and solve an equation:
tan 11.5° = 40 / x
x = 40 / tan 11.5°
x = 196.6
The horizontal distance between the towers is 196.60 ft.
What are heights and distances in trigonometry?Distance is the measurement of an object from a specific point in the horizontal direction, and height is the measurement of an object in the vertical direction.
Here, ∅₁ is called the angle of elevation and ∅₂ is called the angle of depression. For one specific type of problem in height and distances, we have a generalized formula. Height = Distance moved / [cot(original angle) – cot(final angle)] => h = d / (cot ∅₁ – cot ∅₂)
Given:
The vertical height of the zip line = 40 ft
The angle of elevation = 11.5°
We know, according to trigonometric values tan n = height / base
∴ tan 11.5 = 40 / base
base = 40/ tan 11.5
base = 40 / 0.203
base = 196. 60 ft
Therefore, the horizontal distance between the towers is 196.60 ft.
To learn more about heights and distances refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/17089830
#SPJ2
The reflecting dish of a parabolic microphone has a cross-section in the shape of a parabola. The microphone itself is placed on the focus of the parabola. If the parabola is 40 inches wide and 20 inches deep, how far from the vertex should the microphone be placed?
a) 4 inches
b) 5 inches
c) 8 inches
d) 10 inches
The microphone, which is at the focal point of a parabolic microphone, should be placed 5 inches from the vertex of the parabola since the parabola is 40 inches wide and 20 inches deep.
Explanation:The question deals with a parabolic shape and requires using the properties of a parabola to determine the position of the focal point. In the context of a parabolic microphone, the focal point is where the microphone should be placed to best capture sounds. For a parabola given in the form y = 4px, where p is the distance from the vertex to the focus, and the parabola is 40 inches wide (which is the distance from one end of the parabola to the other at the given depth) and 20 inches deep (which is the distance from the vertex to the directrix), we can find p, using the relationship depth = p. Since the depth is 20 inches, the focus (and thus where the microphone should be placed) is 20/4 = 5 inches from the vertex of the parabola.
10 points) National Institutes of Health recommends that the healthy adults take at least 50 nmol/L of vitamin D per day. Suppose that you are interested in finding out if the BSU students are suffering from vitamin D deficiency or not. (a) (5 points) Formulate the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. Clearly define the parameter of interest in the context of the problem.
Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
The National Institutes of Health has recommended that the healthy adults are to take at least 50 nmol/L of vitamin D per day. Let’s assume that you are interested in discovering if the BSU students are suffering from vitamin D deficiency or not.
a) Formulate the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses
Null hypothesis
H o : u >= 50
Alternative hypothesis
Ha : u < 50
Compute the following probabilities: If Y is distributed N(1, 4), find Pr ( Y ≤ 3 ) . If Y is distributed N(3, 9), find Pr ( Y > 0 ) . If Y is distributed N(50, 25), find Pr ( 40 ≤ Y ≤ 52 ) . If Y is distributed N(5, 2), find Pr ( 6 ≤ Y ≤ 8 ) .
Answer:
a) If Y is distributed N(1, 4), Pr (Y ≤ 3) = 0.84134
b) If Y is distributed N(3, 9), Pr (Y > 0) = 0.84134
c) If Y is distributed N(50, 25), Pr (40 ≤ Y ≤ 52) = 0.63267
d) If Y is distributed N(5, 2), find Pr (6 ≤ Y ≤ 8) = 0.22185
Step-by-step explanation:
With the logical assumption that all of these distributions are normal distribution,
a) Y is distributed N(1, 4), find Pr ( Y ≤ 3 )
Mean = μ = 1
Standard deviation = √(variance) = √4 = 2
To find the required probability, we first standardize 3
The standardized score for any value is the value minus the mean then divided by the standard deviation.
z = (y - μ)/σ = (3 - 1)/2 = 1
We'll use data from the normal probability table for these probabilities
The required probability
Pr ( Y ≤ 3 ) = P(z ≤ 1) = 0.84134
b) If Y is distributed N(3, 9), find Pr ( Y > 0 )
Mean = μ = 3
Standard deviation = √(variance) = √9 = 3
To find the required probability, we first standardize 0
The standardized score for any value is the value minus the mean then divided by the standard deviation.
z = (y - μ)/σ = (0 - 3)/3 = -1
We'll use data from the normal probability table for these probabilities
The required probability
Pr ( Y > 0) = P(z > -1) = 1 - P(z ≤ -1) = 1 - 0.15866 = 0.84134
c) If Y is distributed N(50, 25), find Pr (40 ≤ Y ≤ 52).
Mean = μ = 50
Standard deviation = √(variance) = √25 = 5
To find the required probability, we first standardize 40 and 52.
For 40,
z = (y - μ)/σ = (40 - 50)/5 = -2
For 52,
z = (y - μ)/σ = (52 - 50)/5 = 0.4
We'll use data from the normal probability table for these probabilities
The required probability
Pr (40 ≤ Y ≤ 52) = P(-2.00 ≤ z ≤ 0.40)
= P(z ≤ 0.40) - P(z ≤ -2.00)
= 0.65542 - 0.02275
= 0.63267
d) If Y is distributed N(5, 2), find Pr ( 6 ≤ Y ≤ 8 )
Mean = μ = 5
Standard deviation = √(variance) = √2 = 1.414
To find the required probability, we first standardize 6 and 8.
For 6,
z = (y - μ)/σ = (6 - 5)/1.414 = 0.71
For 8,
z = (y - μ)/σ = (8 - 5)/1.414 = 2.12
We'll use data from the normal probability table for these probabilities
The required probability
Pr (6 ≤ Y ≤ 8) = P(0.71 ≤ z ≤ 2.12)
= P(z ≤ 2.12) - P(z ≤ 0.71)
= 0.983 - 0.76115
= 0.22185
Hope this Helps!!
Answer:
a) The value of N(1, 4) = 0.8413
b) The probability of N(3, 9) = 0.8413
ci) The probability (40≤ Y≤ 52) = 0.4
cii) The probability of N (3, 9) = 0.6236
d) The probability of (6≤Y≤8) = 0.2216
Step-by-step explanation:
Detailed step by step explanation is given in the attached document.
A normal distribution is a bell shaped symmetric distribution. This kind of distribution has a normal probability density function. A standard normal distribution is the one that has a mean 0 and variance of 1. It is often denoted as N (0, 1). If a general variance and mean are given and one has to look up probabilities in a normal probability distribution. The variable is standardized first. Standardizing a variable involves subtracting the general mean from the standard and then dividing the result by 1. In order to find the probabilities, the value of z is located in a normal distribution table.
The manager of a fast-food restaurant determines that the average time that her customers wait for service is 1.5 minutes. (a) Find the probability that a customer has to wait more than 4 minutes. (Round your answer to three decimal
Answer:
0.069 = 6.9% probability that a customer has to wait more than 4 minutes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Exponential distribution:
The exponential probability distribution, with mean m, is described by the following equation:
[tex]f(x) = \mu e^{-\mu x}[/tex]
In which [tex]\mu = \frac{1}{m}[/tex] is the decay parameter.
The probability that x is lower or equal to a is given by:
[tex]P(X \leq x) = \int\limits^a_0 {f(x)} \, dx[/tex]
Which has the following solution:
[tex]P(X \leq x) = 1 - e^{-\mu x}[/tex]
In this problem, we have that:
[tex]m = 1.5[/tex]
So
[tex]\mu = \frac{1}{1.5} = 0.6667[/tex]
[tex]P(X \leq x) = 1 - e^{-0.667x}[/tex]
Find the probability that a customer has to wait more than 4 minutes.
Either the customer has to wait 4 minutes or less, or he has to wait more than 4 minutes. The sum of the probabilities of these events is decimal 1. So
[tex]P(X \leq 4) + P(X > 4) = 1[/tex]
We want P(X > 4). So
[tex]P(X > 4) = 1 - P(X \leq 4) = 1 - (1 - e^{-0.667*4}) = 0.069[/tex]
0.069 = 6.9% probability that a customer has to wait more than 4 minutes.
The chess club and the ballet club of Nahk University were founded at the same time, and they each accept new members at a constant rate. The chess club accepts 5 new members each week, and it had 37 members after 6 weeks. The number of members in the ballet club as a function of time (in weeks) is given by the following table of values:
Answer:
1:B the ballet club
2.B the ballet club.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is correct on khan :)
The chess club accepts 5 new members each week, and had 37 members after 6 weeks. The club started with 7 members. Without more data, a similar function for the ballet club cannot be determined.
Explanation:This question requires a bait to understand the concept of linear functions. The chess club at Nahk University accepts 5 new members each week and had 37 members after 6 weeks. We can express this as a linear function, with the number of weeks as the independent variable and the number of members as the dependent variable:
Members = 5 * Weeks + Initial Members
Here, we know from the information given that after 6 weeks, the chess club had 37 members. So if we plug those numbers into the equation:
37 = 5 * 6 + Initial Members
Then solving for the number of initial members gives us 7. Hence, the chess club started with 7 members.
To find a similar function for the ballet club, we would need more specific data to map time (in weeks) to the number of members in the same way.
Learn more about linear functions here:https://brainly.com/question/29205018
#SPJ2
The sum of four consecutive integers is 74.
What is the first integer?
Answer:
17
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x, x +1, x + 2, x + 3 be four consecutive integers.
[tex] \therefore \: x + x +1 + x + 2 + x + 3 = 74 \\ \therefore \: 4x + 6 = 74 \\ \therefore \: 4x = 74 - 6 \\ \therefore \: 4x = 68 \\ \therefore \: x = \frac{68}{4} \\ \huge \red{ \boxed{x = 17}}[/tex]
Hence, first integer is 17.
Answer:
17 is your answer
hope this helps :)
Step-by-step explanation:
How do get this answer?
Answer:
A line is at a degree of 180, so the line 170 is on can give you the degree of the smallest angle: 10. A traingel has a total degree of 180, so 125 + 10 = 135. Take 180 and subtract 135 to get x = 45º
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x = 45°
Step-by-step explanation:
Since it's a triangle, the total degrees of it would be 180
You are given one of the angles measurements and another's' supplementary angle
180 - 125 = 55
Take the 170 and subtract from 180 to get the interior angle of the triangle
180 - 170 = 10
Now subtract 55 and 10 to get x
55 - 10 = 45
Answer the question bellow
Answer:
A 35 pages per hour
Step-by-step explanation:
The rate of change is the slope
(0,150) (7,400)
m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
=(400-150)/(7-0)
=250/7
=35.7 pages per hour
Approximately 36 pages per hour
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Rate = slope
(500-150)/(10-0)
= 350/10
= 35
Which expressions are equivalent to 2 (three-fourths x + 7) minus 3 (one-half x minus 5)? Check all that apply.
The equivalent expression to 2 (three-fourths x + 7) minus 3 (one-half x minus 5) is 29.
Explanation:To find equivalent expressions to 2 (three-fourths x + 7) minus 3 (one-half x minus 5), we first need to distribute the numbers outside the parentheses inside the parentheses. This simplifies the expression as follows:
2 (three-fourths x + 7) becomes 1.5x + 14 3 (one-half x minus 5) becomes 1.5x - 15Subtracting the second expression from the first, we obtain: (1.5x + 14) - (1.5x - 15), which simplifies to 0x + 29, or simply 29.
Therefore, the only expression equivalent to the given expression is 29.
Learn more about Equivalent Expressions here:https://brainly.com/question/27911936
#SPJ12
Answer:
The answer is B, C, and E
Step-by-step explanation:
Evaluate 1/3x[8-5]+9?
Answer:
x+9
Step-by-step explanation:
1/3x[8-5]+9=1/3x(3)+9
1/3x(3)+9=x+9
x+9
The final result of the expression 1/3x[8-5]+9 is 10.
To evaluate the expression 1/3x[8-5]+9, we need to perform the operations in the correct order, following the PEMDAS/BODMAS rule. PEMDAS stands for Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division (from left to right), and Addition and Subtraction (from left to right). BODMAS is similar but is used in some regions with the 'O' representing "Orders" or "Indices" instead of Exponents.
Step 1: Inside the brackets, we solve the expression 8 - 5, which gives us 3.
Step 2: Now, we have 1/3x3 + 9. According to PEMDAS/BODMAS, we must perform multiplication before addition. So, we proceed with 1/3 times 3, which equals 1.
Step 3: The expression now simplifies to 1 + 9.
Step 4: Finally, we perform the addition, which yields 10.
To know more about expression here
https://brainly.com/question/14083225
#SPJ2
Use the t-distribution to find a confidence interval for a mean μ given the relevant sample results. Give the best point estimate for μ, the margin of error, and the confidence interval. Assume the results come from a random sample from a population that is approximately normally distributed.1. A 90% confidence interval for μ using the sample results x^- =143.0, s=56.7, and n=50Round your answer for the point estimate to one decimal place, and your answers for the margin of error and the confidence interval to two decimal places.i. point estimate = ii. margin of error = iii. The 90% confidence interval is_______ to _________.
Answer:
i. Point of estimate:
[tex] \hat \mu = \bar X =143.0[/tex]
ii. Margin of error:
[tex] ME = 2.01 *\frac{56.7}{\sqrt{50}}= 16.12[/tex]
iii. The 90% confidence interval
Replacing in the confidence interval formula we got
[tex]143.0-16.12=126.88[/tex]
[tex]143.0+16.12=159.12[/tex]
The 90% confidence interval is 126.88 to 159.12
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
[tex]\bar X=143.0[/tex] represent the sample mean for the variable of interest
[tex]\mu[/tex] population mean
s=56.7 represent the sample standard deviation
n=50 represent the sample size
Confidence interval
The confidence interval for the true mean when we don't know the deviation is given by the following formula:
[tex]\bar X \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex] (1)
In order to calculate the critical value for the confidence interval [tex]t_{\alpha/2}[/tex] we need to find the degrees of freedom, with this formula:
[tex]df=n-1=50-1=49[/tex]
The Confidence level provided is 0.90 or 90%, the value for the significance is [tex]\alpha=1-0.9=0.1[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 =0.05[/tex], and we can use excel, a calculator or a table to find the critical value. The excel command would be: "=-T.INV(0.05,49)".And we see that [tex]t_{\alpha/2}=2.01[/tex]
i. Point of estimate:
[tex] \hat \mu = \bar X =143.0[/tex]
ii. Margin of error:
[tex] ME = 2.01 *\frac{56.7}{\sqrt{50}}= 16.12[/tex]
iii. The 90% confidence interval
Replacing in the confidence interval formula we got
[tex]143.0-16.12=126.88[/tex]
[tex]143.0+16.12=159.12[/tex]
The 90% confidence interval is 126.88 to 159.12
Jamin wants to paint a wall in his bedroom. In order to know how much paint to buy, he first needs to know the approximate area. There is a window in the middle of the wall, so he'll only need to paint the shaded part shown. How many square feet is Jamin planning to paint? [Note: The wall and window are both rectangular.]
48 ft 2
45 ft 2
11 ft 2
28 ft 2
Given:
Length of the wall = 8 ft
Width of the wall = 6 ft
Length of the window = 2 ft
Width of the window = 18 in
To find:
The square feet Jamin planning to paint
Solution:
Area of the wall = length × width
= 8 × 6
Area of the wall = 48 ft²
Width of the window = 18 in
Convert inch to feet.
1 feet = 12 inch
18 inch = [tex]\frac{18}{12}=1.5[/tex] ft
Area of the window = length × width
= 2 × 1.5
Area of the window = 3 ft²
Area to be painted = Area of the wall - Area of the window
= 48 ft² - 3 ft²
= 45 ft²
Therefore Jamin planning to paint 45 ft².
Answer:
45 ft²
Step-by-step explanation:
mark me brainy plz!
what is the volume of the hamsta snack box with a width of 1 1/2 inches, a length of2 1/2 inches, and a height of 4 inches
Given:
The width of the snack box is [tex]1 \frac{1}{2} \ inches=\frac{3}{2} \ inches[/tex]
The length of the snack box is [tex]2 \frac{1}{2} \ inches=\frac{5}{2} \ inches[/tex]
The height of the snack box is 4 inches.
We need to determine the volume of the hamsta snack box.
Volume of the box:
The volume of the box can be determined using the formula,
[tex]V=L \times W \times H[/tex]
where L is the length, W is the width and H is the height of the box.
Substituting the values, we get;
[tex]V=4 \times \frac{3}{2} \times \frac{5}{2}[/tex]
Simplifying, we get,
[tex]V=\frac{60}{4}[/tex]
[tex]V=15 \ in^3[/tex]
Thus, the volume of the Hamsta snack box is 15 cubic inches.
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
i did the test and got 100
Write and evaluate the definite integral that represents the area of the surface generated by revolving the curve on the indicated interval about the x-axis. y = 81 − x2 , −5 ≤ x ≤ 5
To find the area of the surface generated by revolving the curve about the x-axis, you need to evaluate the definite integral of the square of the given function within the specified interval.
Explanation:Definite integral representing the area:
Given curve: y = 81 - x^2, -5 ≤ x ≤ 5
Revolving this curve about the x-axis generates a surface. The definite integral representing the area is obtained by integrating the square of the function and applying the limits of integration.
Evaluate the integral: ∫[(-5 to 5) of (81 - x^2)^2] dxThe total area of the regions between the curves is 726 square units
Calculating the total area of the regions between the curves
From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:
y = 81 - x²
Also, we have the interval to be
−5 ≤ x ≤ 5
So, the area of the regions between the curves is
Area = ∫y dx
This gives
Area = ∫(81 - x²) dx
Integrate
Area = 81x - x³/3
Recall that −5 ≤ x ≤ 5
So, we have
Area = |[81(-5) - (-5)³/3] - [81(5) - (5)³/3]|
Evaluate
Area = 726
Hence, the total area of the regions between the curves is 726 square units
You wish to test the following claim (Ha) at a significance level of α = 0.01.
H0: μ1 = μ2
Ha: μ1 /= μ2
You believe both populations are normally distributed, but you do not know the standard deviations for either. And you have no reason to believe the variances of the two populations are equal.
You obtain a sample of size n1 = 22 with a mean of x1^- = 56.2 and a standard deviation of s1 = 18.2 from the first population.
You obtain a sample of size n2 = 11 with a mean of x2^- = 64.2 and a standard deviation of s2 = 13.9 from the second population.
a) What is the test statistic for this sample?
b) What is the p-value for this sample?
Answer:
a) [tex]t=\frac{(56.2-64.2)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{18.2^2}{22}+\frac{13.9^2}{11}}}}=-1.40[/tex]
b) [tex]p_v =2*P(t_{31}<-1.4)=0.171[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
[tex]\bar X_{1}=56.2[/tex] represent the mean for sample 1
[tex]\bar X_{2}=64.2[/tex] represent the mean for sample 2
[tex]s_{1}=18.2[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation for 1
[tex]s_{2}=13.9[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation for 2
[tex]n_{1}=22[/tex] sample size for the group 2
[tex]n_{2}=11[/tex] sample size for the group 2
t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
System of hypothesis
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true means are different, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}\neq 0[/tex]
The statistic is given by:
[tex]t=\frac{(\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}}[/tex] (1)
The degrees of freedom are given by:
[tex]df=n_1 +n_2 -2=22+11-2=31[/tex]
Part a: Statisitc
Replacing into the formula we got:
[tex]t=\frac{(56.2-64.2)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{18.2^2}{22}+\frac{13.9^2}{11}}}}=-1.40[/tex]
Part b: P value
The p value on this case would be:
[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{31}<-1.4)=0.171[/tex]
A newsletter publisher believes that above 78 % of their readers own a personal computer. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to
substantiate the publisher's claim?
State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
This problem involves conducting a hypothesis test, stating the null hypothesis as 78% or fewer readers own a personal computer, and the alternative hypothesis as more than 78% own one. A statistical test (like a z-test) is needed to compare the p-value to the 0.01 significance level. The publisher's claim is supported if the p-value is less than 0.01.
Explanation:In this context, we are conducting a hypothesis test to examine a newsletter publisher's claim about their audience's computer ownership. The null and alternative hypotheses would therefore be set up as follows:
Null Hypothesis (H0): p <= 0.78, meaning 78% or fewer readers own a personal computer.
Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): p > 0.78, meaning more than 78% of readers own a personal computer.
We can conduct a hypothesis test to prove or disprove this using statistical methods such as a z-test and by comparing the p-value to the significance level (0.01 in this case). If the p-value obtained from the test is less than 0.01, we can reject the null hypothesis providing sufficient evidence to support the publisher's claim. If not, we fail to reject the null hypothesis which means the evidence is insufficient.
Learn more about Hypothesis Testing here:https://brainly.com/question/34171008
#SPJ3
(a) Use Euler's method with step size 0.2 to estimate y(1.4), where y(x) is the solution of the initial-value problem y' = 3x − 3xy, y(1) = 0. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) y(1.4) =
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The time taken to prepare the envelopes to mail a weekly report to all executives in a company has a normal distribution, with a mean of 35 minutes and a standard deviation of 2 minutes. On 95% of occasions the mailing preparation takes less than a) 38.29 minutes b) 31.71 minutes c) 35.25 minutes d) 34.75 minutes
Answer:
Mailing preparation takes 38.29 min max time to prepare the mails.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Mean:35 min
standard deviation:2 min
and 95% confidence interval.
To Find:
In normal distribution mailing preparation time taken less than.
i.eP(t<x)=?
Solution:
Here t -time and x -required time
mean time 35 min
5 % will not have true mean value . with 95 % confidence.
Question is asked as ,preparation takes less than time means what is max time that preparation will take to prepare mails.
No mail take more time than that time .
by Z-score or by confidence interval is
Z=(X-mean)/standard deviation.
Z=1.96 at 95 % confidence interval.
1.96=(X-35)/2
3.92=(x-35)
X=38.29 min
or
Confidence interval =35±Z*standard deviation
=35±1.96*2
=35±3.92
=38.29 or 31.71 min
But we require the max time i.e 38.29 min
And by observation we can also conclude the max time from options as 38.29 min.
In a normal distribution, the 95th percentile is calculated by adding twice the standard deviation to the mean. Based on the given mean (35 minutes) and standard deviation (2 minutes), 95% of the time the envelope preparation should take less than 39 minutes.
The problem asks what time, in percentage terms, the preparation for mailing the weekly report to the executives is less than.
Given that the time taken to prepare the envelopes follows a normal distribution with a mean of 35 minutes and a standard deviation of 2 minutes, we need to determine the time that occurs at the 95th percentile of this distribution.
The 95th percentile is found by adding 2 standard deviations to the mean in a normal distribution (this is due to the empirical rule, which states that about 95% of values lie within 2 standard deviations of the mean in a normal distribution).
Here's how you calculate it:
Determine the mean: The mean is given as 35 minutes.
Determine the standard deviation: The standard deviation is given as 2 minutes.
Calculate the 95th percentile: Mean + 2(Standard Deviation) = 35 + 2(2) = 39 minutes.
So, on 95% of occasions the mailing preparation takes less than 39 minutes. None of the options (a, b, c, and d) provided are correct based on the calculations.
For more such questions on normal distribution, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30390016
#SPJ3
(-4x⁴+6x²+3)-(5x²-3) answer should be a standard polynomial
Answer: -4x⁴ + x² + 6
Step-by-step explanation:
Remove parentheses: (-a) = -a
-4x⁴ + 6x²+3 - (5x²-3)
-4x⁴ + 6x² + 3 - 5x² + 3
Simplify -4x⁴+ 6x² + 3 - 5x² + 3: -4x⁴ + x² + 6
-4x⁴ + x² + 6
what is 3 percent of 300
Answer:
9
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to figure this out, I made the proportion:
[tex]\frac{300}{x} =\frac{100}{3}[/tex]
Multiply 3 by 300 and x by 100
300*3=?
x*100=?
900=100x
Divide 900 by 100 to find x
900÷100=9
x=9
Maya picks 16 vegetables from her garden.
6 of them are carrots. The rest are cucumbers.
» Then she gives away 5 cucumbers.
» How many cucumbers does Maya have now?
16 - 6 = 10
10 - 5 = ?
16 + 6 = 22
22 - 5 = ?
16 - 6 = 10
10 + 5 = ?
Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
starts with 16. 6 carrots and 10 cucumbers. 10-5=5
9. Traditional medical treatment will cure about 88% of all people who suffer from a certain eye
disorder. Suppose a large medical clinic treats 93 people with this disorder using a new state-of-the-
art technique.
a.
Estimate the probability that fewer than 80 patients will recover.
b.
The director of the hospital recommends that all hospitals adopt this new technique
since more than 85 patients in the sample have recovered after being treated with the
new technique. Confirm/disprove the director's claim. Show all your work and interpret
your results.
Answer:
a) P (Y less than or equal to 79 ) = 0.226
b) Z = 1.008 less than or equal to Zc = 1.64
So, it means null hypothesis is not rejected.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Probability that fewer than 80 patients will recover.
As we have:
p = 88% = 0.88 = population success proportion
n = 93 = Sample size
mean = n x p , mean = 93 x 0.88 , mean = 81.84
So, we need P (Y less than or equal to 79) fewer than 80 patients.
Standard Deviation of the population =
SD of population = [tex]\sqrt{n . p . (1-p)}[/tex] , SD of population = [tex]\sqrt{93 .0.88 .(1-0.88)}[/tex]
SD of population = 3.13
As we know that,
probability in binomial distribution is approximately equal to normal distribution so, we will use normal distribution from here. In addition, due to this shift 79 will be equal to 79.5 in normal distribution.
P(Y less than or equal to 79) ≈ P(Y less than or equal to 79.5)
P([tex]\frac{Y - mean }{SD}[/tex]) , P([tex]\frac{79.5 - 81.84}{3.1336}[/tex]) , P(Z less than or equal to -0.75)
So, when will you check the Z score of -0.75 in the Z table you will get the probability which is :
P (Y less than or equal to 79 ) = 0.226
So, 0.226 is the probability that fewer than 80 patients will recover.
b) Z test is used in this part to check the claim:
Favorable Cases sample (recovered) = 85 = Y
Sample size = N = 93
Significance level = 0.05
Proportion Sample = p = Y/N = 85/93 = 0.914.
1. Null hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis:
H1: p less than or equal to 88% or p less than or equal to 0.88
H2: p greater than 88% or p greater than 0.88
2. Rejection Region:
Zc value is = 1.64 for a right tail test.
Rejection region is such that z value must be greater than Zc value i.e 1.64. If it is not greater, it will not lie in rejection region.
3. Statistics Test:
In this we have to calculate value of Z and compare it with value of Zc.
Z = [tex]\frac{P-p1}{\sqrt{p1(1-p1)/n} }[/tex]
Small p1 = 0.88 , Capital P = 0.914 Z = [tex]\frac{0.914-0.88}{\sqrt{0.88.(1-0.88)/93} }[/tex]
Z = 1.008
4. Final Decision about the null hypothesis:
As we can see, Z value is less than Zc value, hence it does not lie in the rejection region.
Z = 1.008 less than or equal to Zc = 1.64
So, it means null hypothesis is not rejected.
H1 is not rejected, it means there is not sufficient proof to claim that population proportion is larger than population success proportion p1.
a. Estimate the probability that fewer than 80 patients will recover: Approximately 0.2743.
b. Confirm/disprove the director's claim:
The probability of observing more than 85 patients recovering out of 93 treated with the new technique is approximately 0.1515. Therefore, there isn't sufficient evidence to support the director's claim that all hospitals should adopt the new technique based solely on this sample data.
To solve this problem, we'll use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution since the sample size (93) is relatively large.
Let's break it down step by step.
Given:
Probability of traditional medical treatment curing the disorder = 0.88
Number of patients treated with the new technique = 93
a. Estimate the probability that fewer than 80 patients will recover.
To estimate this probability, we'll use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
1. Calculate the mean [tex](\(\mu\))[/tex] and standard deviation [tex](\(\sigma\))[/tex] of the binomial distribution:
[tex]\[\mu = np = 93 \times 0.88 = 81.84\][/tex]
[tex]\[\sigma = \sqrt{np(1-p)} = \sqrt{93 \times 0.88 \times 0.12} \approx 3.076\][/tex]
2. Standardize the value of 80 using the z-score formula:
[tex]\[z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma} = \frac{80 - 81.84}{3.076} \approx -0.600\][/tex]
3. Use the standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the probability corresponding to z = -0.600.
[tex]\[P(Z < -0.600) \approx 0.2743\][/tex]
So, the estimated probability that fewer than 80 patients will recover is approximately 0.2743.
b. The director of the hospital recommends that all hospitals adopt this new technique since more than 85 patients in the sample have recovered after being treated with the new technique.
Confirm/disprove the director's claim.
To confirm/disprove the director's claim
We'll calculate the probability of observing more than 85 successes (patients recovering) out of 93 trials (patients treated) under the assumption that the success rate is the same as the traditional treatment (0.88).
1. Calculate the mean [tex](\(\mu\))[/tex] and standard deviation [tex](\(\sigma\))[/tex] of the binomial distribution:
[tex]\[\mu = np = 93 \times 0.88 = 81.84\][/tex]
[tex]\[\sigma = \sqrt{np(1-p)} = \sqrt{93 \times 0.88 \times 0.12} \approx 3.076\][/tex]
2. Standardize the value of 85 using the z-score formula:
[tex]\[z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma} = \frac{85 - 81.84}{3.076} \approx 1.031\][/tex]
3. Calculate the probability of observing more than 85 successes:
[tex]\[P(Z > 1.031) \approx 1 - P(Z < 1.031) \approx 1 - 0.8485 \approx 0.1515\][/tex]
The probability of observing more than 85 successes out of 93 trials is approximately 0.1515, which means there's about a 15.15% chance of observing this many or more successes if the true success rate is 0.88.
Since [tex]\(15.15\% > 5\%\)[/tex] (common significance level),
We fail to reject the null hypothesis that the success rate of the new technique is the same as the traditional treatment.
Therefore, there isn't sufficient evidence to support the director's claim that all hospitals should adopt the new technique based solely on this sample data.
The ratio of forks to spoons in the cafeteria is 22:33. If there are 44 forks, how many utensils are there altogether?
Answer:
110 utensils
Step-by-step explanation:
Set up equal fractions, and cross-multiply.
[tex]\frac{22 forks}{33 spoons} = \frac{44 forks}{x spoons}[/tex]
Solve for spoons.
22x = 44*33
22x = 1452
x = 1452/22 = 66 spoons
Now add forks and spoons to get total utensils:
44 forks + 66 spoons = 110 utensils
Answer:
There would be 73 utensils altogether.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the ratio 22:33 and x:44
in order to determine x we need to divide 44 by 22 which leaves us with 1.33333 or 1 and 1/3
we then need to multiply 22 by our quotient of 1.333 in which leaves us with 29.
so x=29
We then have to add 44 and 29 which leaves us with 73;)
what is 20000 x 50000
Answer:
1000000000
Step-by-step explanation:
20000 times 50000 equals 1000000000
when you multiply 20,000 by 50,000, you get the product of 1,000,000,000 or 1 billion.
How to determine the product of 20000 x 50000The The product of 20,000 multiplied by 50,000 is:
20,000 x 50,000 = 1,000,000,000
Therefore, 20,000 multiplied by 50,000 equals 1 billion. of 20,000 multiplied by 50,000 is:
20,000 x 50,000 = 1,000,000,000
Learn more about product at https://brainly.com/question/1712056
#SPJ6