Since the 1918 flu, there has been a relative lack of global

Takeovers


pandemics


Wars


economic depressions

The lasting effect of Marbury v. Madison was the establishment of judicial review, allowing the U.S. Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional and asserting its power to interpret the Constitution.

Lasting Effect of Marbury v. Madison (1803)

The lasting effect of the Marbury v. Madison decision in 1803 was the establishment of the principle of judicial review. This landmark decision by Chief Justice John Marshall allowed the U.S. Supreme Court to declare laws passed by Congress unconstitutional, thereby checking the powers of the legislative and executive branches.

The Marbury v. Madison case affirmed that William Marbury was entitled to his commission, but ruled that the Supreme Court could not issue a writ of mandamus as per the Judiciary Act of 1789, because it expanded the Court's original jurisdiction beyond Article III of the Constitution.

This act by the Court was considered unconstitutional absent a constitutional amendment. By this decision, the Supreme Court asserted its power to interpret the Constitution and to invalidate federal and state laws that violate the Constitution.

The correct answer is D) U.S. forces would withdraw and ARVN troops would assume more combat duties.

President Richard Nixon's plan for Vietnamization of the war was "U.S. forces would withdraw and ARVN troops would assume more combat duties."

The Vietnamization policy was the strategy designed by US President Richard Nixon to gradually reduced the participation of the US troops in the War of Vietnam. Due to the many protests in America against the presence of the US troops in Vietnam and the bad results of the Tet Offense, people increasingly continued to question the US involvement in Vietnam. From then on, the South Vietnamese troops had to more involved in the war with the counseling and training of the US.

Answer: Women in India society are traditionally discriminated against and excluded from political and family related decisions.

Explanation:

Hi, In Indian society, women are traditionally discriminated against and excluded from political and family related decisions. Despite the large amount of work women must do on a daily basis to support their families, their opinions are rarely acknowledged and their rights are limited.

The gender inequality is present in education; only 2/3 of girls between the ages of 6 and 17 are sent to school, compared to 3/4 of boys of the same age.  

Instead of going to school, girls often find themselves forced to work in order to help their families, often from a very young age.

Answer:

wade davis

Explanation:

The phrase 'it ain't what it used to be,' when mentioned by Uncle Sam, expresses a sentiment that America's domestic and international status has declined or changed from its past glory. This could be related to a decline in financial stability of American families or decreased international influence.

When someone says 'it ain't what it used to be,' they are typically referring to a perceived decline or change in the quality of something over time. When applied to the phrase 'Uncle Sam', which is a symbol of the United States government or America as a nation, it could imply a belief that America isn't as great or as effective as it once was.

Considering the context provided, this could reference the decline in the financial stability of American families since the 1970s, as underscored by increases in debt and lower savings (; Uncle Sam could also be saying that America's international influence, vis-a-vis other imperial nations like Germany, Spain, Great Britain, Russia, and France, isn't what it used to be. In essence, this phrase reflects a sentiment of nostalgia for 'good old days' that Reagan tapped into during his presidency.

https://brainly.com/question/818460

#SPJ2

The division of Europe into West and East is one of the negative political effects of World War II. This conflict between the East and West of Europe resulted in a Cold War which was the reason why there was a division of Europe into 2 distinct political blocs. This composed of the Soviet-controlled Eastern European and capitalist Western Europe.

Answer:

Explanation:

The division of Europe into the east and west was a negative political effect because;

"Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, anti-democratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union." ~ Revelations from the Russian Archives, The Soviet Union and the United States, Library of congress

The United States has some experiences/conflicts that are seen on a consistent basis.

For example, the power of the federal government is one that has been seen throughout history. The development of the US Constitution saw Anti-federalists fighting against Federalists in terms of what rights/powers the federal government should have. Today, debates still arise over the issue of what powers the federal government has, especially when it comes to the issue of implied powers.

One success that we share with the Americans in the past is the desire for innovation. Throughout American history, developments in communication and transportation continue to positively influence American society. Even though this is different depending on the time period, the spirit of ingenuinity is something that is seen in all times of American history. This is especially true for the era of the Market Revolution (development of canals, railroads) and today (iPhones, Personal computers, etc.)

Decir que la guerra no ha llegado a sus objetivos, que no tiene consenso sobre los orígenes de la misma, que tiene argumentos para los facilitadores de uno de los capítulos de los más trágicos de la vida política y social del país. Sin embargo, el embargo y la guerrilla de las Farc, es un paso fundamental e histórico hacia una reconciliación que cada vez se acerca más.

Por la necesidad de entender las razones del conflicto armado, la Mesa de Diálogos de La Habana se instaló mediante un acuerdo, el 5 de agosto de 2014, la Comisión de Memoria Histórica del Conflicto y sus Víctimas.

Esta comisión está integrada por 12 expertos y dos reaseguradores, los elegidos en conjunto por las partes negociadoras, los que se han agregado a la tarea de "producir un informe sobre los orígenes y las múltiples causas del conflicto, los principales factores y las condiciones que pueden facilitarlo o contribuir con él". su persistencia, y los efectos y impactos más notorios del mismo sobre la población ".

Dicho informe fue presentado la semana pasada en la Mesa de los Diálogos y el Consto, en las Palabras de la Delegación de las Farc, "un relato plural, aún en construcción, pero ya no unilateral" de lo que ha sido la guerra en Colombia. Allí se recogen las visiones individuales de los 12 expertos, además de las dos relatorías que, siguiendo la metodología, independencia y autonomía académica adoptada por los expertos, fueron desarrolladas por cada relator.

En total son 14 documentos con visiones heterogéneas de la génesis, desarrollo y consecuencias del conflicto. EL HERALDO se dispuso a hacer la tarea de revisarlos y presentar sus principales conclusiones.

The Senate could have prevented Tiberius Gracchus's murder by agreeing to provide more equality for the common people, endorsing his redistributive land reforms, and showing a willingness to address social and economic tensions. Option 1) is correct.

To support Tiberius Gracchus and potentially prevent his murder, the Senate could have done the following: agree to provide more equality for the common people by supporting his law to redistribute public land to landless Romans. This measure was a direct challenge to the senatorial class, as it threatened the large estates many of them had accumulated. Tiberius Gracchus was intent on addressing the decline of the free, farm-owning common Roman population, upon which the strength of Rome's armies relied. Agreeing to support Tiberius's reforms would have shown the Senate's willingness to compromise on the pressing social and economic issues of the day, alleviating some of the tension that ultimately led to violence.

Other options such as agreeing to give more farming land to the patrician class, agreeing to allow the Senate to appoint new consuls, or agreeing to give slaves and foreigners the right to vote were not directly related to Tiberius's reforms and would not have addressed the root causes of the conflict at that time.

He wished to console the nation through the Great Depression and tell them about the war  were the goals of president roosevelt's "fireside chats.

In order to ensure fairness for all and do no favors to anyone, Roosevelt thought that the government should serve as the primary mediator of the nation's competing economic forces, notably between capital and labour.

She worked for civil rights for Asian Americans, African Americans, and World War II refugees as well as increased employment opportunities for women. After her husband's death in 1945, Roosevelt remained active in politics for the remaining 17 years of her life.

He made the President the center of American politics instead of Congress or the political parties. Roosevelt achieved this by leaning on his personal charisma and taking harsh executive action.

Thus, He wished to console the nation through the Great Depression.

For more information about Theodore Roosevelt's goal, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12505404

#SPJ2

Answer: The irony lays in the fact that West Berlin, though walled-in, was a place of freedom.

Explanation:

Since many East Germans were flying to West Germany by first getting to West Berlin, a 13 feet high and 100 miles long wall was built around that side of the city. György Ligeti, a Hungarian composer, described the walled-in West Berlin as “a surrealist cage in which those inside are free.”

The age of eligibility for full social security benefits was 65, but between 2002 and 2007 rose to 67.

Social Security is a federal program that provides financial assistance to eligible individuals and families. It was created in 1935 as part of the New Deal and is primarily funded through payroll taxes. The program provides retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to millions of Americans.

The age of eligibility for full social security benefits increased due to concerns about the sustainability of the program. As life expectancy increased and the number of retirees grew, there were fears that the program would become insolvent. Increasing the age of eligibility was seen as a way to reduce the financial strain on the program.

Therefore, the age of eligibility for full social security benefits was 65, but between 2002 and 2007 rose to 67 due to concerns about the sustainability of the program.

Learn more about social security, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30517240

#SPJ2

In the 1858 Illinois Senate election, supporters of slavery were most likely to support Stephen A. Douglas.

Douglas believed that slavery had reached its natural limits and was no longer viable in areas with bad climatic and soil conditions. He claimed that considering slavery as largely a local problem would aid in finding a solution to the problem.

In order to resolve the problem of bringing slavery into the territories, Douglas emerged as the primary proponent of popular sovereignty, which advocated for giving each territory the right to decide whether to permit. He participated in the Compromise of 1850, an attempt to prevent a sectional crisis, as one of its brokers.

The expansion of American territory was strongly supported by Douglas, who also wished for a transcontinental railroad and a free land/homestead policy.

Thus, In the 1858 Illinois Senate election, supporters of slavery.

For more information about Stephen Douglas say about slavery, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2479829

#SPJ6

Answer:

Its the recognition of African American culture

The difference between authoritarian governments and totalitarian governments is that totalitarian governments C) have an official guiding ideology.

This is different from authoritarian governments where the government doesn't necessarily impose on citizen rights so long as they don't go against the power of the government

In conclusion, option C is correct

Find out more on totalitarian governments at https://brainly.com/question/463275.

Final answer:

The President is part of the executive branch, which enforces laws, while the judiciary branch, including the Supreme Court, interprets laws. These two branches, along with the legislative branch, form the tripartite system of the United States government, with checks and balances in place.

Explanation:

The statement that the President is in a different branch than the judiciary branch of government is correct. The United States government is divided into three branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. The legislative branch, made up of the two houses of Congress, is responsible for making laws. The executive branch, headed by the President, enforces the laws. This branch includes the President's executive cabinet and the civilian head of the armed forces. The judicial branch interprets laws and has the authority to conduct judicial review, determining the constitutionality of laws.

Members of the judicial branch are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Thus, although separate, the branches interact, with the President and Congress being able to check and balance the judiciary. For example, the President nominates justices to the Supreme Court, who then serve for life, allowing a President to influence the judiciary even after leaving office. The President can also submit amicus briefs to the Court and influences the solicitor general.

Several factors caused World War II in Europe, including the unchecked rise of fascism in Italy and Germany, the power struggle between Germany and the Soviet Union, and Japan's ambition to rid Asia of Western influences. The West's indecision over whether fascist Germany or the Communist Soviet Union posed a greater threat to world peace also played a part. Additionally, the fallout from World War I, including economic depression and social upheaval, helped extremist political ideologies rise.

There were several factors that caused World War II in Europe. First, the rise of fascism in Italy and Germany went unchecked, specifically with the Nazis gaining diplomatic advantage and British and French acquiescence to their expansionism in Austria and the Sudetenland. This led to their military domination over parts of Europe. Second, one of the sparks for the war was the struggle for power between Germany and the Soviet Union, with the former launching a surprise invasion against the latter in 1941. Third, Japan's perception of Western racism and its ambition to rid Asia of Western influences (though it also regarded itself as the new regional leader) also contributed to the wider global conflict.

Moreover, there was the West's indecision over whether fascist Germany or the Communist Soviet Union was the greater threat to world peace. This uncertainty was partly due to political conservatives in England and France hoping for a German alliance against the Soviets. Lastly, economic depression and the social upheaval it created, in part owing to the fallout from World War I, helped extremist political ideologies like fascism and communism grow.

https://brainly.com/question/12602320

#SPJ12

The causes of World War II in Europe include the rise of fascism and totalitarianism, the unjustified expansion of Nazi Germany, and international territorial disputes and tensions.

Learn more about Causes of World War II here:

https://brainly.com/question/12602320

#SPJ6