Bridgeport Company has an old factory machine that cost $43,000. The machine has accumulated depreciation of $24,080. Bridgeport has decided to sell the machine. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter 0 for the amounts.)(a)What entry would Bridgeport make to record the sale of the machine for $21,080 cash?(b)What entry would Bridgeport make to record the sale of the machine for $11,080 cash?

Answer:

a) 46.16 dollar per day favorable

b) accpeting the offer will provide a gain for 16,848.4 dollar

Explanation:

interest revenue for the decreased collection time:

6,700 check x 155 dollar each x 0.016% =  166,16‬

We will be taking the cash from teh customer earlier thus, earning interest on this amount

The cost will be 120 dollar the bank charges per day

Giving a net effect of 46.16 dollars in favor of the company per day

annual savings: 46.16 x 365 = 16.848,4‬

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B" and "E": Behave in an authoritarian way.; Hold back talented employees.

Explanation:

Disrespected bosses tend to use their authority to let others know their ideas since they transmit no inspiration because of who they are. It is the only form they can get subordinates' attention. Besides, when subordinates start to show leadership skills or special talents, the disrespected boss would minimize that individual in an attempt to keep his or her power and not to be replaced by that subordinat

Answer:

a) Average demand during the lead time = Sum of all the historical demand during lead time / Number of periods

= (55+75+75+70+80+60+50+70+60+85) / 10

= 680 / 10

= 68 gallons

b) Standard deviation of demand during lead time(\sigmadL) = 8.5 gallons

At 95% service level,value of Z = 1.65

Safety stock = Z(\sigmadL) = 1.65(8.5) = 14.03 gallons

c) Reorder point = Average demand during the lead time + Safety stock

= 68 + 14.03

= 82.03 gallons

Answer: -1.26%

Explanation:

We can solve for this using the following formula.

Return on Stock Market = Down figure of Index / ( Close figure of Index - down figure of Index)

So calculating we have,

Return on Stock Market = -98.34 / ( 7,447.50 - (-98.34))

Return on Stock Market = -98.34 / 7,545.84

Return on Stock Market = - 0.0126

Return on Stock Market = -1.26%

The return of the stock market that day was approximately -1.31%.

To calculate the return of the stock market that day, we can use the formula for percentage return:

[tex]\[ \text{Percentage Return} = \left( \frac{\text{Change in Price}}{\text{Initial Price}} \right) \times 100 \][/tex]

Given that the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down by 98.34 points from the previous day's close to 7,447.50, we can calculate the initial price by adding the loss to the closing price:

[tex]\[ \text{Initial Price} = \text{Closing Price} + \text{Change in Price} \] \[ \text{Initial Price} = 7,447.50 + 98.34 \] \[ \text{Initial Price} = 7,545.84 \][/tex]

Now, we can calculate the percentage return:

[tex]\[ \text{Percentage Return} = \left( \frac{-98.34}{7,545.84} \right) \times 100 \] \[ \text{Percentage Return} = -0.01304 \times 100 \] \[ \text{Percentage Return} \approx -1.304\% \][/tex]

Rounding to two decimal places, the return of the stock market that day was approximately -1.31%.

Answer:

b.$10,000 and $40,000.

Explanation:

Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, then followed by unrealized receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last.

For Petra, the inventory is distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $40,000.

This reduces Petra's basis to $10,000. The land is distributed next and takes the $10,000 remaining basis

$50,000 (partnership interest) – $40,000 (inventory) = $10,000 (land distribution)

Price floors in the agricultural industry often result in C. a surplus of agricultural goods and a problem of disposal.

A price floor is a government-imposed limit on how low a price can be set for a specific good or service. It is often used to ensure that the price does not fall below a certain level, protecting producers and workers. Price floors can lead to surpluses and market inefficiencies if set above the equilibrium price.

When price floors are used to keep prices above free-market levels in the agricultural industry, the common outcomes are a surplus of agricultural goods and a problem of disposal of surplus agricultural goods. Price floors can lead to an overproduction of agricultural goods, resulting in a surplus. This surplus then creates a challenge for farmers and the government to find ways to deal with the excess goods.

https://brainly.com/question/28925293

#SPJ12

A. Overinvestment in the agricultural industry, C. A surplus of agricultural goods and D. A problem of disposal of surplus agricultural goods are common examples of such price controls.

Price floors and price supports set a minimum price below which a good or service cannot be sold. Minimum wage laws and agricultural price supports are common examples of such price controls. When price floors are used to keep prices above free-market levels in the agricultural industry, several common outcomes can be observed:

Answer:

Possible options;

a.No, she should consume more hamburgers and fewer hot dogs.

b.No, she should consume more hot dogs and fewer hamburgers.

c.Yes, so there is no need to change her eating habits.

d.There is not enough information to answer the question.

Answer is C

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Despite the fact that it seems jerry can easily take a bow of the discussion with Lucy and forge ahead in selling the car to Roberta, he had certain restrictions that he should respect. Accepting $100 from Lucy, Jerry entered into what we know as an “Option” contract, giving an option to Lucy to buy the car in the next two weeks.

Irrespective of Lucy’s financial status, jerry should respect the contract that he has entered into. As a back-up, he can hold discussions with Roberta and can request her to wait for 2 weeks when the option period expires and he can sell the car to her at an outright payment

Jerry is bound by an option contract with Lucy which prevents him from selling the car to anyone else for two weeks, despite receiving a better offer from Roberta in the interim.

Jerry finds himself in a contractual predicament due to an agreement to sell his classic car. When Lucy offers Jerry $100 to keep the offer open for two weeks, and he accepts it, they enter into what is known as an option contract. This means Jerry is legally obligated to keep the offer open for the agreed period and cannot sell the car to someone else during that time, regardless of any other offers he receives or concerns about Lucy's ability to secure financing.

In this scenario, the ethical and legal course of action for Jerry would be to inform Roberta that he is currently bound by the terms of his contract with Lucy and thus unable to accept her immediate offer. Jerry can explain to Roberta that if Lucy does not complete the purchase within the two-week period, he would then be free to negotiate with Roberta or any other potential buyers.

Answer:

c. $3,750

Explanation:

Green Thumb Company provides two years warranty for any product defect. The provision needs to be made for the warranty expense and it should be reported in the balance sheet as warranty liability. The company budgets the warranty expense to be 2% in year of sales which is $2,400 ($120,000 * 2%) and 3% in the year after sale which is $1,350 ($45,000 * 3%). The total warranty liability for the year 2017 which will be reported at December 31, 2017 is $3,750.

Answer:

Borrowing of $29,040

Explanation:

Whether or not Howard needs to borrow at end of October can be ascertained by computing the cash excess or shortfall a shown below:

Opening cash  balance        $8,400

Cash collections                $548,000

Cash available                   $556,400

Cash payments                  ($578,140)

Desired cash balance       ($7,300)

Cash shortfall                    ($29,040)

The company has to borrow $29,040 in order to be able to make the desired cash payment and still have the desired cash closing balance of $7,300 at end of October

Answer:

15.79%

Explanation:

Current Average operating asset = $500,000

Decrease in asset base will make average operating asset $380,000 [500000 - 120000]

ROI = Operating Income / New operating asset base

=$60,000 / $380,000

= 15.78947...% = 15.79%

Hence, the correct answer is 15.79%

Answer:

Country with fallen exchange rate (fall - 5%) , will face domestic Inflation.

Explanation:

Law of One price suggests that goods cost same in two countries, when their prices are converted into common currency based on exchange rate.

International Price of a good = Domestic Price x Exchange Rate

So maintaining 'Law of one price' : Fall in exchange rate is accompanied by Increase in domestic prices (Inflation). And, Increase in exchange rate is accompanied by Decrease in domestic prices (Deflation).

Given : Fall in real exchange rate by 5%. So, corresponding domestic currency prices will inflate.

Answer:

$75,423.49

Explanation:

Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows.

Present value can be calculated using a financial calculator.

Cash flow each year from year one to five = $22,500

I = 15%

Present value = $75,423.49

To find the PV using a financial calacutor:

1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

3. Press compute

I hope my answer helps you

The present value of the investment is approximately $74,789.01.

To calculate the present value of the investment, we need to use the formula for the present value of an ordinary annuity. The formula is: PV = CF x (1 - (1 + r)^-n) / r, where PV is the present value, CF is the cash flow per period, r is the discount rate, and n is the number of periods.

In this case, the cash flow is $22,500 per year, the discount rate is 15% (or 0.15), and the number of periods is 5 years. Plugging these values into the formula, we get: PV = $22,500 x (1 - (1 + 0.15)^-5) / 0.15 = $74,789.01 (rounded to two decimal places).

Therefore, the present value of this investment is approximately $74,789.01.

https://brainly.com/question/32096811

Preferred stockholders will receive the entire $480,000, but will receive nothing more relating to this dividend declaration. Common stockholders will receive nothing. Thus, the correct answer is option d.

Preferred shareholders have priority over a company's income, meaning they are paid dividends before common shareholders.

Preferred Stockholders are entitled to the dividend as follows:-

= 2,400,000 shares * $7.00 * 8%

= $1,344,000

They are entitled to $1,344,000 in dividends, but because the dividends declared do not total that amount, they will accept the entire amount declared.

However, because preferred stockholders only have a current dividend preference and not a cumulative dividend preference, they cannot claim the remaining balance in any other year. As the preferred stockholder takes the entire $480,000, common shareholders receive nothing this year.

Therefore, option D is correct if the preferred stockholders only have a current dividend preference.

To learn more about preferred stockholders, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13755084

#SPJ5

Answer:

Accounting profit= $350,000

Economic profit= $200,000

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Restaurant:

Earnings= 600,000

Employees= (200,000)

Ingridients= (50,000)

Lawyer:

Earnings= 150,000

The difference between the economic and accounting profit is that the first one includes the opportunity cost of not working as a lawyer.

Accounting profit= 600,000 - 250,000= $350,000

Economic profit= 600,000 - 250,000 - 150,000= $200,000

Joe's restaurant has an accounting profit of $350,000, which is calculated by subtracting the cost of employees and ingredients from the revenue. The economic profit, which additionally subtracts the opportunity cost of Joe not working as a lawyer, is $200,000.

Joe runs a restaurant and his accounting profits and his economic profits are calculated from his annual activities. First, to calculate accounting profit, we subtract the explicit costs of employees ($200,000) and ingredients ($50,000) from his revenue ($600,000). This gives us an accounting profit of $600,000 - $200,000 - $50,000 = $350,000. Next, to find economic profit, we consider not only the explicit costs but also the opportunity cost of Joe's next best alternative to running the restaurant, which was his previous job as a lawyer earning $150,000 per year. Therefore, the economic profit is $350,000 (accounting profit) minus the opportunity cost of $150,000, resulting in $200,000.

Answer:

The optimal production plan gives a total costs of $417,672 for the periods Feb to May

In Feb we will have to hire 26 workers to close the gap between demand and production from our 100 existing workers

In March however, we will have to lay them off (26 workers) to keep our production in line with demand.

In April, we are constrained to 100 workers, thus requiring that we run overtime. The overtime requirement is between 3,060 hours to max of 5,000 hours. Note that inspire of the hours chosen, demand for April still won't be fulfilled.

The best option will be the one that gives us last backlog because of the costs of backorder being extremely costly.

5,000 overtime hours in April is the best option .

In May, we are constrained to our 100 workers, meaning we will fulfill our back orders and also retain inventory in hand of 7,760 units.

The 3 pages attached show how the cost is worked out and the presentation as well.

Answer:

There is a decrease in monthly net operating income of $16,000

Explanation:

Consider Incremental Revenues and Costs as a result of the introduction of the  sales commissions.

Sales Commission ( 8,200 units × $11)  ($90,200)

Decrease in Monthly Salary                    $74,000

Net Income                                               ($16,000)

There is a decrease in monthly net operating income of $16,000

Solution:

A Warranty is raised due to replace or corrects a product within the given period of time by the seller to the buyer. It is an obligation of the company. As per the matching principle the estimated warranty liability will reported as warranty expenses in the period when revenue is recognized

Journalizing is the process of recording of transactions in the book of original entry. It gives a complete picture of business transaction. It is recorded in chronological order. It is the pre phase for preparation of ledgers. Adjustment journal entry passed on the end of the year to get adjusted trial balance for preparation of financial statement.

The company H provides the additional information and required to calculate amount of warranty expenses and estimated warranty liability in different year ends and passing journal entry of the followings.

1.

Company sold copier of costing of $4,800 for $ 6,000 with an expected warranty cost of 4%.

Calculation of warranty expenses is as below.

Warranty expenses = rate of warranty * sales price

4% * $6000

= $240

Warranty expenses for the company which reported in the 2015 for the copier is  $240

2.

Company sold copier of costing of $4,800 for $ 6,000 with an expected warranty cost of 4%.

Calculation of estimated warranty liability reported as of 31st December, 2015 is as below.

Estimated Warranty expenses = rate of warranty * sales price

4% * $6000

= $240

Estimated warranty liability for the company which reported as of 31st December, 2015 for the copier is  $240

3.

In the year 2016 the company $209 repair required for the copier. And this amount charged against estimated warranty liability. The company provided two year parts warranty, for this warranty expenses charged in the year 2015.

Hence no further warranty expenses reported in the year 2016 for the copier.

4.

Computation of estimated warranty liability for the copier as of December 31st, 2016 is as below.

Balanced of Estimated Warranty liability =  

Estimated Warranty liability in previous year - cost of repair charged against                    

                                                             estimated warranty liability balance

= $240 - $209

= $31

Balance of estimated warranty liability for this copier as of December 31st, 2016 is $31

5.

(a)

On August 16th, 2015 the company H sold a copier costing $4,800 for $6,000 and it required to pass journal entry as below.

[ Find FIGURE in attachment no. 1]

( consider year 2016 as 2015 and 2017 as 2016 in the attachment)

Cash account debited, because of increase of asset, sales account credited as the result increased the income. Cost of goods sold account debited, increase in expenses, and inventory account credited, because of decrease in value of asset.

Here the compound journal entry is passed, as company followed perpetual inventory system.

(b)

On December 31st 2015 the company required to pass the following adjustment entry to recognize the warranty expenses

[ Find FIGURE in attachment no. 2]

( consider year 2016 as 2015 and 2017 as 2016 in the attachment)

Warranty expenses account debited, because of increase of expenses and estimated warranty liability credited, because of increase in liability.

(c)

On November 22nd 2016 the company repairs on warranty sale and $209 of material taken form the repairs parts Inventory and the journal entry is passed as below.

[ Find FIGURE in attachment no. 3]

( consider year 2016 as 2015 and 2017 as 2016 in the attachment)

Estimated warranty liability debited, because of decrease in liability and Repair Parts Inventory account credited, because of decrease in asset.

Answer and Explanation:

The journal entry are as follows

1. Interest expense $214,650

       To Cash $214,650

(Being the first interest payment is recorded)

The computation is shown below

= $4,770,000 × 9%  × 6 months ÷ 12 months

= $214,650

For recording this we debited the interest expense as it increased the expenses while on the other hand the cash is paid which reduced the cash balance so it is credited

2. Cash $530,000

      To Bond payable $530,000

(Being the cash sale of bond is recorded)

For recording this we debited the cash as cash is received that increased the cash balance and at the same time we credited the bond payable

Answer:

$3.00

Explanation:

Manufacturing cost per unit= Total material cost/Equivalent unit

Cost per Unit= $81300/$21700

Cost per unit = $3.00

Answer:

$ 12

Explanation:

Conversion cost per unit equals $9.00.

Total materials costs are $81300

Equivalent units of production for materials are 27100

MAterial Costs per unit = Total materials costs /Equivalent units of production

Material Costs per unit =$81300/ 27100= $ 3 per unit

Total manufacturing cost per unit= Conversion cost per unit +Material Costs per unit = $ 9+ $3= $ 12

We find the material costs per unit and add it with the conversion cost per unit to get the total manufacturing cost per unit

An unexpected decrease in oil prices increases aggregate supply by shifting the aggregate supply curve to the right, while a mandated increase in health insurance contributions by producers leads to a decrease in aggregate supply, shifting the curve to the left.

For each of the following scenarios, the effect on aggregate supply can be determined based on the changes in production costs and other relevant factors:

The rationale behind these effects is that a decrease in oil prices reduces production costs, allowing firms to supply more at the same price levels, thereby shifting the curve to the right. Conversely, an increase in mandatory health insurance contributions raises production costs, leading to a reduced quantity of goods and services supplied at the same price levels, which shifts the aggregate supply curve to the left.

Answer:

1) price of Bond A=$953.18

2) price of Bond B=$484.05

3) price of Bond A= $ 926.66

4) price of Bond B= $ 353.54

Explanation:

According to the given data, we have two Bonds, Bond A and B with a face of value of $1,000 each of them, the coupon rate is of of 4%.

If The market interest rate for similar bonds is 9%, therefore the price of bond A and B would be calculated using the following formula:

PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv)

Hence, price of Bond A= PV(9%/2,1*2,40/2,1000)*-1

           1) price of Bond A=$953.18      

          price of Bond B= PV(9%/2,30*2,40/2,1000)*-1

          2) price of Bond B=$484.05

If that yields increase to 12%, therefore the price of bond A and B would be the following:

                  price of Bond A= PV(12%/2,1*2,40/2,1000)*-1

                  3) price of Bond A= $ 926.66

                 price of Bond B= PV(12%/2,30*2,40/2,1000)*-1

                 4) price of Bond B= $ 353.54

Answer:

1. $953.18

2. $484.05

3. $926.66

4. $353.54

Explanation:

Price of the bond is the present value of all cash flows of the bond. These cash flows include the coupon payment and the maturity payment of the bond. Both of these cash flows discounted and added to calculate the value of the bond.

1.

Bond A

According to given data

Face value of the bond is $1,000

Coupon payment = C = $1,000 x 4% = $40 annually = $20 semiannually

Number of periods = n = 1 years x 2 = 2 period

Market Rate = 9% annually = 4.5% semiannually

Price of the bond is calculated by following formula:

Price of the Bond = C x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + r )^-n ) / r ] + [ F / ( 1 + r )^n ]

Price of the Bond = 20 x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + 4.5% )^-2 ) / 4.5% ] + [ $1,000 / ( 1 + 4.5% )^2 ]

Price of the Bond = $953.18

2.

Bond B

According to given data

Face value of the bond is $1,000

Coupon payment = C = $1,000 x 4% = $40 annually = $20 semiannually

Number of periods = n = 30 years x 2 = 60 period

Market Rate = 9% annually = 4.5% semiannually

Price of the bond is calculated by following formula:

Price of the Bond = C x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + r )^-n ) / r ] + [ F / ( 1 + r )^n ]

Price of the Bond = 20 x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + 4.5% )^-60 ) / 4.5% ] + [ $1,000 / ( 1 + 4.5% )^60 ]

Price of the Bond = $484.05

Now Change the Market Interest rate to 12%

3.

Bond A

Price of the Bond = 20 x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + 6% )^-2 ) / 6% ] + [ $1,000 / ( 1 + 6% )^2 ]

Price of the Bond = $926.66

4.

Bond B

Price of the Bond = 20 x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + 6% )^-60 ) / 6% ] + [ $1,000 / ( 1 + 6% )^60 ]

Price of the Bond = $353.54

Answer:

to prove Tip Top Tractors engaged in predatory pricing, you would need to prove that Tip Top Tractors priced a tractor below average variable cost with specified intention of driving Tractor-ama out of business.

Explanation:

Predatory pricing is a strategy to cut prices and set a price really low to gain new customers. This strategy is also used to stop entering other firms into business and create monopoly or Drive competitors out of their business. Tip Top Tractors has also adopted this strategy and has lowered the prices of tractor to $1500 which is below that the $2000 which is normal price in the city.  To prove that Tip Top Tractors has adopted predatory pricing, we require proof that the prices are set below average variable cost.

Answer:

The correct answer is $1.2 per share.

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:

Interest expense of Bonds = $20,000 × 4% = $800

Now, Interest expense of Bond, After tax = $800 × ( 1 - 50%) = $800 × 0.50

= $400

So, we can calculate the diluted earning by using following formula:

Diluted Earning = (Net income + Interest expense after tax) ÷ Total outstanding shares outstanding

Where, Total outstanding shares = 1,000 shares + 1,000 shares = 2,000 shares

By putting the value, we get

Diluted earning = ($2000 + $400 ) ÷ 2,000

= $1.2 per share

Answer:

6.05 years

Explanation:

Payback period is the time in which a project returns back the initial investment in the form of net cash flow. For this purpose we use the net cash flows to calculate the payback.

Payback working is attached with this answer please find it.

Answer:

$3,000

Explanation:

Inventory Sold   2,000*$50=$100,000

Warranty Expense $100,000*3%=$3,000

Therefore $3,000 would be reported in warranty liability account.

When any claim for warranty is reported,the liability will be set off by debiting it and corresponding effect to inventory or stores will be taken.

Answer:

The question is not complete ,find below complete part of the  question:

The entrepreneur who founded the company is convinced that sales will increase next year by 60% and that net operating income will increase by 210 %, with no increase in average operating assets. What would be the company’s ROI? 3. The Chief Financial Officer of the company believes a more realistic scenario would be a $1,100,000 increase in sales, requiring a $275,000 increase in average operating assets, with a resulting $107,800 increase in net operating income. What would be the company’s ROI in this scenario? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

ROI is 99.20%

ROI is 33.76%

Explanation:

ROI under the first scenario;

Return on Investment(ROI)=net income/average operating assets*100

sales forecast $3,400,000*(1+60%)=$5,440,000.00  

net operating income  forecast $272,000*(1+210%)=$843,200

average operating assets is $850,000

forecast ROI=$843,200.00/*$850,000*100

 forecast ROI=99.2%

ROI under the second scenario:

sales forecast($3,400,00+$1,100,000)=$4,500,000

net operating income forecast ($272,000+$107,800)=$379,800

average operating assets ($850,000+$275,000)=$1,125,000

forecast ROI=$379,800/$1,125,000

                    =33.76%

Answer:

$38,000

Explanation:

Since the Jones elected gift splitting, each spouse will may give $15,000 worth of gifts to their son without paying taxes:

the total value of the gifts (must use fair market value) = $15,000 (minivan) + $18,000 (bonds) + $35,000 (furniture) = $68,000

taxable amount = $68,000 - $30,000 (combined tax free gifts) = $38,000

Answer: 1. a. The Statute of Frauds

19. a. Calculation error

Explanation:

1. The Statute of Frauds

This is a common law concept that requires that certain types of transactions and/contracts are to be immortalised in writing.

Some of the contracts involved include the sale of Land ( which this scenario falls under) and contracts that will last a year and beyond.

19. Fraud is the act of misrepresenting facts to deceive others intentionally and make more often than not make financial gains from it.

The key thing to remember is that this done INTENTIONALLY. A Calculation error is just that, an Error. So it is not intentional which means that it is not an element of fraud.

Answer: The correct answer is YES it is admissible as evidence of the plumber's fault.

Explanation: An Evidence has probative value if it tends to prove an issue. The testimony of the homeowner of the regarding the plumber's response is a party admission. It is admissible as a hearsay exemption under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) which explains that a statement or statemens made by a party in a case cannot be excluded as hearsay when offered against him by the opponent. As such, the statement is a probative evidence.

Yes, the homeowner's testimony regarding the plumber's response could be admissible evidence in a trial as it can be seen as a tacit admission of negligent work by the plumber. However, rules for admissibility of evidence can vary, hence a consultation with a legal expert is advised.

The subject matter pertains to the admissibility of evidence in a legal proceeding or trial. Specifically, it pertains to whether the homeowner's testimony regarding the plumber's response is admissible.

In most court rooms, an admission of defective installation can be a potential evidence to be used in court against the defendant, in this case, the plumber. In this situation, the plumber's admission of his fault and the promise to fix it can be seen as a tacit admission of negligent work. This can be interpreted as the acceptance on his part that the installation he did was faulty. Hence, the homeowner's testimony regarding the plumber's response can be considered admissible in a trial, subject to other evidentiary rules.

The rules for admissibility of evidence can vary depending on the jurisdiction and certain other factors, though. Therefore, a consultation with a legal expert is necessary for specifics of the case.

https://brainly.com/question/34652117

#SPJ12