No. John F. Kennedy took many risks.
In October 1962, the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union put the world on the brink of nuclear conflict. US reconnaissance planes have discovered Soviet medium-range missiles allowed in Cuba.
On October 22, President John Kennedy, in a televised address, denounced the existence of Russian missiles in Central America.
The US decreed a naval blockade against the island of Fidel Castro and gave the USSR an ultimatum. Kennedy demanded from the head of state Nikita Khruchov the immediate dismantling of the ramps, the removal of the missiles and the renunciation of the installation of new offensive weapons in Cuba. Washington also warned that if the blockade failed, the island would be invaded.
•The second claim is that the Constitution does not place protecting property rights as the centerpiece of the government.
• If property, which was the economic interest of the founders, was paramount in their eyes, why is the constitution so silent on the issue? This clearly shows that the intent of the constitution was not economic.
Plz paraphrase this into ur own words thank u
In order to rewrite a text with your own words -- paraphrase it -- a bigger part of it works better. You need to resume main ideas and "translate" them to your thinking.
- On the other hand, secondly: protection of property rights is not the focus of the government stablished by the Constitution.
- The absence of property on the Constitution illustrates the impossibility to affirm that economic interest of the founders was the main driving force for their actions.
Why did the major strikes of the late 1800s lead to a backlash against labor unions?
To set important trend so employees appealed frequently for court orders against unions.
The labor movement of 1865-1919 was initiated by strikes that began because of wage cuts, the new inventions of machinery, and the depersonalization of workers.
During the late 1800s, the unions were conducting strikes that led to rioting and disorder.
From the paintings in the Tomb of the Leopards, we learn that the Etruscans: _________.
A. did not believe in an afterlife
B. none of the other answers
C.did not bury family members in the same tomb
D. buried leopards with rulers held women in high regard
The correct answer is held women in high regard
Explanation: The Etruscans were a merchant people and very skilled in architecture and the arts and served as the basis for the creation of Roman society in antiquity. The Etruscans populated the Italic Peninsula from the ninth century BC, so even before Rome.
They were more advanced people than the others, with their own culture that stood out, and excelled in crafts and sculpture. The Etruscans also had considerable knowledge of architecture and engineering.
Final answer:
The Etruscans held women in high regard and believed in an afterlife akin to their earthly life, as depicted in the Tomb of the Leopards.
Explanation:
From the paintings in the Tomb of the Leopards, we learn that the Etruscans held women in high regard and believed in an afterlife that mirrored their current lives. The elaborate banquet scenes, including men and women reclining on couches and engaging in social activities, suggest a society where women held a significant social position. Moreover, the inclusion of items for use in the afterlife in their tombs indicates that the Etruscans believed in an existence beyond death.
How did the Nazi government change Germans and Germany?
Answer:
Sadly enough, der Führer Adolf Hitler and his Nazi party managed to inspire German society and persuade it to their racist superiority vision. Hitler and the Nazi government enjoyed widespread support before and during a good part of WWII, fanaticism and absolute loyalty motivated young Germans. They even closed their eyes to news about the horrors of Holocaust.
Explanation:
"In American History, 20 students failed. Only 11 students failed World History. American History must be a more difficult course than World History." This statement is criticized because the measurement "number of students who fail" is being used as an indicator of "course difficulty." Thus, "number of students who fail" is claimed to be A) invalid. B) confounded. C) unreliable. D) biased. E) categorical.
The measurement of the number of students who fail as an indicator of course difficulty is unreliable.
Explanation:The measurement of the number of students who fail being used as an indicator of course difficulty is criticized because it is considered unreliable. Failures can result from various factors such as individual effort, teaching methods, or grading criteria, and may not accurately reflect the difficulty of a course.
For example, it is possible that the American History course had more challenging exams or stricter grading, leading to a higher failure rate. However, this does not necessarily mean that American History is inherently more difficult than World History.
Therefore, it is important to consider additional measures, such as class content, student feedback, teaching methods, and assignment complexity, to assess the relative difficulty of different courses.
Learn more about Course Difficulty here:https://brainly.com/question/29577574
#SPJ11
What measures might have been implemented by the Taft administration to help integrate African-Americans into the mainstream, both economically and politically?
The Taft administration lasted from 1909 to 1913. William Howard Taft was the successor of Theodore Roosevelt, but was unable to gain reelection in 1912 when competing against Woodrow Wilson.
During his presidency, Taft was ineffective in improving the situation of African Americans. He did not appoint African Americans to federal jobs, and in fact, did not allow them to enter employment in places where he belived there might be racial friction. This stance was known as Taft's "Southern Policy."
There are many measures that could have been implemented by the administration to help integrate African Americans. Taft could have pushed more African Americans to study higher education. He also could have refused to remove or replace black officeholders with whom whites refused to deal.
Which of the following series of events is listed in proper sequence?
(A) New York City draft riots; second Battle of Bull Run; authorization by Confederate Congress for arming of slavesb.
(B) Sherman's capture of Atlanta; Battle of Gettysburg; 1862 fall electionsc.
(C) Gettysburg Address; Emancipation Proclamation; reelection of Lincolnd.
(D) second Confiscation Act; Siege of Vicksburg; congressional passage of Thirteenth Amendment
Answer: (D) Second Confiscation Act; Siege of Vicksburg; congressional passage of Thirteenth Amendment
Explanation:
The Second Confiscation Act was passed by Union Congress and aproved by Lincoln in 1862 during the Civil War. It stated that after its aproval on July 17, Confederate leaders and generals who did not surrender to the Union in sixty days, would have their property confiscated, including slaves, thus obtaining their freedom and emancipation. This measure however, was only enforceable on areas under Union control, and it meant that slaves would gain their freedom only when captured by Union forces.
The Siege of Vicksburg took place in 1863, ending in July 4 as a mayor Union victory since the capture of the city meant complete Union control over the Mississippi, splitting the Confederacy in half . The siege was carried out by Ulysses S. Grant and it completed the "Anaconda Plan" conceived by the Union to isolate and cut-off the Confederacy by blockading eastern ports and controling the traffic of the Missisipi.
The Thirteenth Amendment was officialy adopted as law in January 31 1865, after the conclusion of the Civil War. It abolished slavery and servitude in The U.S. (with the exception of criminal forced labour). Though it legallly meant the emancipation and freedom from servitude, the South remained deeply racist, with some states passing down laws that would eventually culminate in Segregation.
Which phrase was not an achievement of the government of Chandragupta Maurya's empire? formed a highly organized bureaucracy built a system of roads and harbors for trade established courts to ensure justice for the weak expanded into southern India to control trade routes
The correct answer is expanded into southern India to control trade routes
Explanation: Chandragupta had a true empire that stretched from the Indus to the Ganges, dominated the delta of these two rivers, and was supported by a mighty army. The administrative organization seems to have been well undertaken, overseen by imperial inspectors, and facilitated by the good state of the roads which the sovereign had taken great care of. It was no longer a question for Seleucus to despise the alliance of such a powerful monarch: he left his territories beyond the Indus and bestowed on her the hand of a Greek princess. From that moment on, India entered the orbit of the great empires of time; its capital, situated in Pataliputra or Magadha, was for many decades the center of a Greek embassy which Ambassador Magastenio illustrated, and whose information is precious, though secondhand.
Answer:
the answer on top is right!!!
THANK !!!YOU!!!!
Explanation:
The contributions of this man, more than any other, helped the U.S. Navy become the third strongest naval power at the turn of the nineteenth century.
A.William Seward
B.Theodore Roosevelt
C.Alfred Thayer Mahan
D. Frederick Jackson Turner
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840-1914) conceived the idea that sea power was the key to a strong foreign policy. His thinking is behind the building and strengthening of the US Navy, dominating American naval planning. He was so influential that his ideas led to a race among powers to have powerful navies in the 19th and the 20th centuries.
Read the views of two modern-day historians:Historian
A:The American Revolution was caused by the American colonists' greedy desire for more money. They were simply tired of paying their fair share of taxes to the British government, even though British troops protected the colonies during the French and Indian War! Furthermore, their claims to be fighting for freedom and liberty are totally wrong. Many of the colonists still owned slaves at the time of the Revolution! The traitorous American colonists simply wanted to steal land that was already claimed by Great Britain.Historian
B:The American Revolution was completely justified due to Great Britain's repeated abuse of the colonists. The British passed enormous taxes on goods in the colonies, even though the Americans had no say in the British government. British soldiers were also allowed to live in American houses and eat common people's food without paying. During the Boston Massacre, British soldiers even fired their muskets into a crowd of civilians! Under such oppressive conditions, it's no wonder that the patriotic colonists would want to fight for the freedom and liberty of all people!Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians' arguments?
A.Both try to confuse the reader with unrelated details rather than making any strong claims.
B.Neither can be considered a credible source because they did not experience the American Revolution.
C.Neither uses any historical evidence to support his claims about the American Revolution.
D.Both try to persuade the reader by only including details that support their arguments.
The correct answer is letter D.
Explanation: Both historians are trying to persuade the reader, both of them are biased and do not want to make the British seems bad or aggressive. They are only including details that can support their own arguments.
Although Americans perceived Manifest Destiny as a benevolent (goodwill) movement, it was in fact an aggressive imperialism pursued at the expense of others. Assess the validity of this statement with specific reference to American expansionism in the 1840s
Answer:
First, there is the annexation of Texas which was an initial lost of territory for Mexico in 1845, or at least it became formal. The ensuing Mexican-American War (1846-1848) started as a border conflict, but its outcome accomplished the great goal of westard expansion to the shores of the Pacific Ocean that is part of the Manifest Destiny doctrine. Besides, it added millions of square miles to the territory of the US.
Explanation:
Final answer:
Manifest Destiny in the 1840s was a belief in American preordained expansion seen as benevolent by proponents but was in reality aggressive imperialism at the expense of indigenous peoples and Mexicans.
Explanation:
The concept of Manifest Destiny in the 1840s encapsulated the American belief that their expansion across the continent was inevitable, just, and ordained by divine will. This worldview led to significant territorial acquisitions, such as the annexation of Texas and Oregon, and the Mexican-American War, which brought the Southwest and California under American control.
However, while advocates of Manifest Destiny saw it as a noble undertaking, it was also a form of aggressive imperialism that disregarded the rights and sovereignty of Indigenous peoples and Mexicans living in those regions. American expansionism can be seen as a complex phenomenon that exerted economic, cultural, and political pressures on the westward movement, reflecting both the ideal of spreading democratic institutions and the more practical motivations of expansionism driven by settlers and entrepreneurs.
The Oration on the Dignity of Man fused Judaism and Christianity together with Plato's philosophical stance and statement of people having the freedom and power to become as wicked/beastly or as intellectual/holy/successful as they wanted. The oration makes specific referrences to the Hebrew's Judaism by mentioning how Enoch transformed into an angel, Mal'akh Adonay Shebaoth, and how humans can sometimes transform themselves into divine beings.
Answer:
The Oration on the Dignity of Man is one of the well-known works of Pico Della Mirandola. It's based on ideas already consolidated on the subject, presenting an original contribution when he asks: for which reason the man would be a great miracle?
Explanation:
This work is passed to posterity as a kind of Renaissance manifesto of man, described as the center of the world (anthropocentrism). A true manifesto of the Renaissance spirit - this is what one might call The Oration on the Dignity of Man, in which he, as a microcosm, looks in connection with the macrocosm and stands out as an intermediate reality between the world and God.
why was benjamin franklins signature on the declaration of independence sure to make him either a hero or a traitor?
Answer: He was a hero
Explanation: Franklin firmly endorsed the idea that Britain should relax its control over the American colonies and allow settlers a greater role in running their own businesses.
In 1774 he went to England to petition King George III (1738-1820) in favor of the colonists and the newly formed Continental Congress. The king and the House of Lords rejected the petition, and by the time Franklin returned to Philadelphia, the American Revolutionary War (1775-1783) had already begun.
After his election to the Second Continental Congress, Franklin organized the postal service, becoming its chief, and helped Thomas Jefferson write the Declaration of Independence, signed July 4, 1776. That same year, Franklin was chosen as ambassador. American in France and, while in office, managed to convince the French government to support the American cause with weapons and supplies.
Final answer:
Benjamin Franklin's signature on the Declaration of Independence was significant because it risked being convicted of treason if the American Revolution failed.
Explanation:
Benjamin Franklin's signature on the Declaration of Independence was significant because it came with great risk. As a member of the committee that drafted the Declaration, Franklin was well aware that signing the document would mean committing an act of treason against the British crown.
At the time, the colonies were engaged in a struggle for independence, and the Declaration was a direct challenge to British authority. The signatories, including Franklin, were essentially putting their lives on the line: should the revolution fail, they would be executed for treason.
However, their success transformed them into heroes who fought for American freedom. Franklin's role extended beyond his signature; he was also a key diplomat in France, immensely contributing to securing French support, which was vital for the American victory in the Revolutionary War.
Franklin, renowned for his wisdom, diplomacy, and scientific intellect, was already a respected figure. His influence in France and his embodiment of the Enlightenment ideals made him a beloved figure both domestically and abroad.
The act of signing the Declaration was consistent with his commitment to liberty and rejection of tyrannical authority, which he demonstrated through various endeavors to promote social good and advance education, as seen in his formation of the American Philosophical Society and the Pennsylvania Hospital, among others.
The historical impact of Franklin's signature is dual-faceted; it cemented his reputation as a staunch advocate for independence and freedom, and it marked him as a potential traitor to England. This bold move would ensure his place as a foundational figure in the birth of the nation or, alternatively, as a disgraced traitor, subject to execution.
As it democratized American Christianity, the Second great Awakening both took advantage of the market revolution and criticized its excesses. Explain.
Answer:
Preachers were against greed and the welfare of others.
yo que se Answer:
Explanation:
In the era after World War I and before the Great Depression, American suburbs began to grow rapidly because of
Question options:
increased use of airplanes.
invention of electric lights
mass production of automobiles.
greater availability of information.
The correct answer is mass production of automobiles.
Explanation: The United States story periods between 1918 and 1945
It is marked by a period of great economic growth. By the end of the 1920s, however, the United States would enter a major period of economic recession, marked by high unemployment, misery and deflation, which would extend throughout the 1930s, and the negative effects of which have shaken many other countries. worldwide. In 1941, with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States would enter World War II, thus marking the end of the Great Depression. The war would end in 1945, and with its end, the United States would become one of the two great world superpowers, the other being the Soviet Union.
Which of the selections listed below is one of the major differences between the Constitutions of the United States and Florida?
Select one:
A.
the United States Constitution is still in its original form, while the State of Florida is currently using its sixth Constitution.
B. the United States Constitution contains a Preamble, while the Florida Constitution does not.
C.
the Florida Constitution contains Articles, while the United States Constitution does not.
D. the Florida Constitution secures the rights of individuals, while the United States Constitution does not.
Answer:
i think THE ANWSER IS C
Explanation:
Answer:
A.
the United States Constitution is still in its original form, while the State of Florida is currently using its sixth Constitution.
Explanation:
The difference is the forms.
The US one is on its original form, from 1787.
The Florida one is the sixth one, last edited in 1968.
So the correct answer is:
A.
the United States Constitution is still in its original form, while the State of Florida is currently using its sixth Constitution.
During World War II, the US and Soviet Union were allies. After the War the two countries came into conflict. What were the causes of this conflict? How did the two countries view each other?
Answer:
The wartime alliance and positive feelings about it were over in 1946-1947. It became obvious the Soviets would establish a firmer domination of Eastern Europe through local communist and united front forces. They came to view themselves as rivals. In an Europe ravaged by the war, the only force that could oppose Soviet expansion and maneuvering was the United States of America.
Explanation:
7. The author says, "The other big change is how
powerful the government has become." You can
reasonably infer that with "powerful," she is
referring to an increase in
a gold reserves
b military strength
c responsibilities and functions
d the number of federal judges
Answer:
c Responsibilities and functions.
Explanation:
It is obvious it refers to the overall regulating powers of the government. Option D would be an illogical answer.
Answer:
c. responsibilities and functions
Explanation:
The most likely answer in this case would be an increase in the responsibilities and functions of the government. More gold reserves do not have any impact on the government. Neither do the number of federal judges. While military strength can indicate a powerful government, this is not always the case, and it is more common when thinking vis-a-vis a foreign country. However, a government that has expanded responsibilities and functions is always a government that has gained more power over its territory.
The first sizable American migration into Texas occurred amid the following circumstances:
a. Ongoing Native American raids on Mexican villages.
b. A new Mexican nation in need of government revenue.
c. American westward expansion
d. All the Above
Answer: D
Explanation: The history of Texas, as part of the United States, begins in 1845, but the occupation of the region dates from the Upper Paleolithic Period, around 10,000 BC.
What patterns of borrowing characterized the emerging states in East and Southeast Asia?
Answer:
The governments of East Asian and Southeast Asian countries, the makers of what economists call the "East Asian miracle" (Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia) , have intervened extensively in their financial markets. Their policies aimed at creating financial markets and institutions, heavy regulatory laws were passed, they directed credit selectively to some industries and away from others. In this way, they wanted to mobilize savings and influence the allocation of investment. They provided rewards (subsidies, access to credit or foreign exchange on preferential terms) to industries or companies that were in priority business areas or whose performance was very good.
They also discouraged consumption credits by impeding mortgage markets and others from developing. The aim was to stimulate savings.
Explanation:
Cheap goods from China are destroying the American economy. If we are going to reduce the unemployment rate and maintain our living standard, we must stop the Chinese from selling goods at such low prices in the United States. If I am elected, I will fight hard for a 50 percent tariff that will save American jobs for American workers. Evaluate this statement. Explain why you either agree or disagree with it.
Answer:
I disagree with this policy as it will likely have a negative effect.
Explanation:
I disagree with this statement. In fact, such a policy will most likely have the opposite effect to the one intended - that is, living standards would plummet. This is due to the fact that a 50 percent tariff will mean prices of goods imported from China would skyrocket, which in turn would force consumers to either buy more expensive products produced in the United States or elsewhere, or refrain from buying said goods. In any case, this means a reduced level of consumption, which slows down the economy. This would trigger effects such as massive layoffs as enterprises try to keep their profits amidst the reduced consumption, meaning higher unemployment and lower wages being offered, which will in turn slow down the economy even more, in a ever worsening vicious cycle that could lead to an economic crisis.
I disagree with the policy here given the fact that the tariff on the goods would cause the price of these imports to go high in the economy.
What are tariffs?There are protective duties that a country may decide to impose on imports that are from other nations.
A 50 percent tariff on these goods would be injurious to the consumers of the goods who would experience a hike in the prices of the goods.
Read more on tariffs here:
https://brainly.com/question/8000501
The constitution: Was it an economic document?
What is henry steele commager point of view? And does he agree with Beard thesis?
Please help me! I am struggling a lot
The constitution is seen as an economic document.
For Beard “was essentially an economic document based upon the concept that the fundamental private rights of property are anterior to government and morally beyond the reach of popular majorities.”
For Henry Steele Commager the Constitution was primarily a political document, focusing mainly on the problem of federalism, and not an economic document.
They do not agree.
Sometimes the goals of different social institutions conflict, making it difficult to meet people's needs. Which of
these illustrates this idea?
A(religious organizations opening homeless shelters
B)federal pollution regulations affecting corporate profits
C)states requiring more rigorous testing for students to graduate
D)banks competing for customers by offering lower interest rates on loans
Option b reflects this idea. federal pollution regulations affecting corporate profits.
This conflict can be seen in this way, the federal government as an institution wants to stop pollution. This a good step that they are taking, given that environmental pollution is unhealthy for humans and the environment.
The Corporate organizations on the hand are mostly the cause of these pollutions. Their business activities result in environmental pollution.
This government regulations would require them to face different sanctions on any form of pollution they release into the environment. They may even be forced to stop operations. When this happens, their profit would be affected.
read more on social institutions here https://brainly.com/question/9793095?referrer=searchResults
How did the industrial revolution start in England
Answer:
years 1760 to 1830.
Explanation:
industrial revolution occurred between years 1760 to 1830. The revolution started gaining its momentum in 1780 and was at its peak in the field of iron and steam power production after 1800. The industrial revolution had changed the fate of the Britain land and changed the complete infrastructure forever which had produced a great impact on the economy of England as compared to rest of the world which was far behind.
The main factor that flows throughout the flow chart between households and
firms is?
Land
Labor
Products
Capital
The correct answer is Products.
Explanation: Households are owners of factors of production and Firms are users of factors of production.
The flowchart is a quality tool used to reproduce a sequence and interaction of process activities through graphic symbols. Symbols provide a better response to the process process, helping to understand it and creating a more visual and intuitive process description.
What foreign policy did the United States pursue after its involvement in World War I?
Question options:
A. The United States seized territories from its European rivals to build its empire.
B. The United States led the League of Nations to promote peace.
C. The United States limited its involvement in international affairs.
D. The United States paid for the rebuilding of Great Britain and France?
Answer:
Letter c because the US wanted to be isolated i think
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
After WWI, Americans were reluctant to engage in global affairs. They were mainly afraid of entaglements that could drag the country to new wars.
During the 1920s, the Red Scare, the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti, and the rise of nativism were all signs of
Question options:
a rising fear of foreigners.
the start of the Great Depression.
the benefits of new technologies.
the return of normalcy.
Answer:
During the 1920s, the Red Scare, the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti, and the rise of nativism were all signs of A) The rising fear of foreigners.
Explanation:
Rise of nativism and the Red Scare were signaling towards a rising fear of foreigners as immigrants in other countries. During the late 80’s, nativism was favored over a potential foreign threat which was involved with the assassination of the Spanish prime minister and William Mckinley who was the president.
The rising tides of immigration garnered more attention during the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti who were Italian immigrants and were executed on charges of murders at Massachusetts, even though no direct evidence was found to link the murders.
In 2000, Green party candidate Ralph Nader forced more attention on ________ issues and drew away a small percentage of votes from Al Gore. budgetary welfare environmental health national security
In 2000, Green party candidate Ralph Nader forced more attention on environmental issues and drew away a small percentage of votes from Al Gore.
Ralph Nader, a Green Party candidate in 2000, attracted attention to environmental issues and took a small proportion of votes away from Al Gore. So, option (c) or (iii) is the correct answer.
why did Ralph Nadar concentrate on environmental issues?There is no actual difference between the two major-party candidates, according to Nader.
“Kyoto!” Nader made a snide remark. "It was watered down so severely, built to alienate the third world," Gore said, "that there was no drive to make the argument" for the treaty's ratification in the Senate. In the Senate, there was unanimous opposition.
Though Ralph Nader is running as an independent this time, rather than under the Green Party flag, he still has some considerable small-G green cred (at least among those who aren't still angry over his supposed part in Al Gore's 2000 presidential defeat).
For more information about Ralph Nader, refer below
https://brainly.com/question/14402777
what was life like for African Americans in the years right before Taft's term in office?
Answer:
African-Americans were among the disfranchised groups of American society in the late 19th century-early 20th century. Most blacks lived in the South by 1908. The Jim Crow laws had erected powerful barriers to effective equality and the exercise of black political rights, imposing literacy tests and poll taxes which made them very hard to register for voting. There were also fewer economic opportunities and education chances for them.
Explanation:
Final answer:
African Americans faced systemic disenfranchisement, segregation, and racial violence in the years before President Taft's term. Efforts for civil rights and equality by leaders like W.E.B. Du Bois and the NAACP faced significant obstacles. The Great Migration represented a search for better opportunities but also led to continued struggle in northern urban areas.
Explanation:
Life for African Americans right before President Taft's term in office was marked by significant hardships and racial inequality. In the South, where the majority lived, they faced disenfranchisement, with many laws and policies designed to deny them their voting rights and enforce segregation. African Americans held various roles in their communities as skilled craftsmen, ministers, and teachers, which were avenues into political engagement, albeit with numerous constraints. Despite having gained certain rights during Reconstruction, by the late 1870s, the withdrawal of Northern troops and the reassertion of white supremacy meant Southern blacks were free in name but faced systematic efforts to strip away their rights. Discrimination and the threat of violence loomed large over their lives, severely limiting economic opportunities and resulting in high rates of unemployment.
By the early 20th century, African American leaders like Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois debated the best strategies for achieving equality, with the latter founding the NAACP to fight for civil rights. Civil rights efforts saw incremental progress over the years, with occasional backlash and periods of increased racial violence. African Americans also took part in the Great Migration, moving out of the rural South to the industrial North in search of better job opportunities, only to face poverty and unemployment in new settings. Events like the dishonorable discharge of black infantry by President Roosevelt after a violent incident showed the prevailing lack of concern for black perspectives at the highest levels of government.
Which ideas best describe Louisiana’s plantations in the antebellum period? Check all that apply.
A)They typically relied on enslaved workers.
B)They usually included large homes.
C)They were only in very remote areas.
D)They grew sugar and other major crops.
E)They had small plots of land for farming.
F)The women on plantations did little work.
Answer:
Right answers here:
A)They typically relied on enslaved workers.
B)They usually included large homes.
D)They grew sugar and other major crops.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
your welcome