Answer:
(B) Preoperational
Explanation:
The theory developed by the famous psychologist Jean Piaget, about the preoperational stage, describes the characteristics of reasoning during a person's age. More specifically, it is the phase of cognitive development that the child goes through between 2 and 7 years.
What is a difference between obedience and conformity?
Answer:
To conform means to act in accordance with certain expectations or specifications in place. In contrast, to obey means to fulfill a specific command. Thus, the difference between the two is that conformity is to act as expected without any specific instruction to do so, while obey means the opposite. to obey thing that the want you to do like orders and you have to do it in force someone may force you to do something it like taking orders from someone
Explanation:
Conformity requires a request, obedience involves an order. Conformity is going along with persons of equal status; obedience is obeying someone with a higher position. While conformity is driven by the desire to fit in, obedience is driven by social influence.
What do you mean by Conformity?Conformity is the process through which individuals alter their attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, or perceptions to more closely align with those of the organizations they identify with, aspire to join, or for whose approval they are looking.
Conformity is peer pressure; the person submits to it without being asked to do so because they want to fit in and be accepted. On the other hand, those in positions of authority, such teachers and police officers, command obedience.
Therefore, Conformity requires a request, obedience involves an order. Conformity is going along with persons of equal status; obedience is obeying someone with a higher position.
Learn more about Conformity, here;
https://brainly.com/question/15730332
#SPJ2
Bernie sanders with martin luther king jr
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
After Little Albert acquired a conditioned fear of rats, Watson wanted to see how he would react to a white rabbit, cotton wool, and a Santa Claus mask. He was studying whether or not ________ had occurred.
Answer:
fear
Explanation:
Little Albert has a fear of rats, so fear goes in the blank.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: He was studying whether or not ___ had occurred, would be: stimulus generalization.
Explanation:
The experiment that John B. Watson carried out on Little Albert, in the 1920´s, had the purpose of showing the process of classical conditioning of responses to stimulus. After managing to produce a reaction of fear in Little Albert, the child who was subjected to Watson´s experimentation, the researcher further wanted to see if the conditioned response to the rats would extend to other stimuli. As such, he used animals that were similar to the rat, and tried to ascertain the responses by the child. This use of animals similar to the one that caused the initial response, is called stimulus generalization.
Structurally, the Articles of Confederation created
a) three branches of governments
b) only one governing body
c) a federal judiciary
Answer:
Answer choice A
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.
Answer:
Structurally, the Articles of Confederation created Three branches of governments
Explanation:
The confederation article is among the first constitution in America that established the union during the war of revolutionary. The congress of the intercontinental then drafted it and passed the declaration.
The article led to cooperation among different states; the report was in favor of the power of the country because they were not confident about a central and robust government. This was because insufficient federal government with the three bodies of the ruling.
This is the reason why the confederation article served as a document that led to the declaration of power.
Which of the following illustrates Gilroy's concept of circuitry of black culture?
A. Black cultural artifacts move in a linear direction.
B. Cultural exchanges amongst black folks only comes from Africa to Europe.
C. Circulation of people, ideas, technology and information within the Black Atlantic
D. World that moves multi-directionally at different speeds and by different means.
Answer:
B. Cultural exchanges amongst black folks only comes from Africa to Europe.
Explanation:
Cultural exchanges amongst black folks only comes from Africa to Europe illustrates Gilroy's concept of circuitry of black culture.
How does the organization of the Senate allow a small minority of the population to have significant power in the legislative process?
Answer:
Explanation:
One of these beautiful things about the United States legislature is how much force that minority party has to prevent or boring government. It would be the shame to miss this and to move the assembly into another edition of the House of Representatives with the only difference being the members-only have more massive egos. And all filibustering chairman Trump's appointment of Justice Gorsuch, with no strategy, endgame, or knowing, ensures is this is just what would happen. As the conservative who saw himself at the minority in recent years fighting back against President Obama, I realize the allure of engaging in fights yet possibly useless things all too well. We do get grounds to appease, after all. Still, I believe you can rue that time you pushed Mitch McConnell's finger to push the nuclear switch at the shortsighted revenge turn at Merrick garland's failed appointment.
Experiments allow researchers to: a) reflect the natural environment. b) study the entire complexity and uniqueness of an individual. c) inexpensively adhere to the scientific method. d) determine a cause-and-effect relationship.
Answer:
d) determine a cause-and-effect relationship.
Explanation:
The experiment is a type of scientific research that aims to obtain the causal relationship (cause and effect) between two variables.
Thus, the researcher manipulates and controls one or more independent variables and observes the variation in the dependent variables.
For example, suppose you suspect that the number of colors available increases the number of phones sold. At first, you analyze the normal selling rate with traditional colors. In a second moment you increase the amount of colors available and compare the new sales rate with the natural rate. If there is a difference, the sales level (dependent variable) was affected by the independent variable (available colors).
Experiments allow researchers to determine cause-and-effect relationships by controlling variables and manipulating the independent variable. Through experimental research, developmental psychologists can make causal statements about variables important for the developmental process. However, caution is needed when applying findings from the laboratory to natural environments.
Explanation:Experiments allow researchers to determine a cause-and-effect relationship. In an experiment, researchers have significant control over extraneous variables and manipulate the independent variable to study its effect on the dependent variable. Through experimental research, developmental psychologists can make causal statements about variables important for the developmental process. However, researchers must be cautious about whether the findings from the laboratory translate to an individual's natural environment.
Learn more about Experiments here:
https://brainly.com/question/38143472
#SPJ11
Question Value: 20 points Jamal is concerned about his neighbor, Paul. Paul recently killed a cat and hid the body under his house. When confronted he was not sorry and did not seem bothered by his actions. _____ personality disorder may be an appropriate diagnosis for Paul.
Answer:
Antisocial personality disorder
Explanation:
People who suffer from antisocial personality disorder often feel lack of remorse or care for their actions and how it may affect others. Seeing that Paul seemed unremorseful when confronted by Jamal about the killing of the cat, it points to him having antisocial personality disorder.
A defendant is on trial for murder. The only evidence linking the defendant to the crime is some blood found at the scene. The lead detective testifies that an officer took a vial containing a blood sample that had been retrieved by a crime scene technician and drove off with it. The officer is now dead. Next, the prosecution presents as a witness a crime lab chemist. The chemist will testify that he took a vial of blood that contained a label identifying it as having been retrieved from the subject crime scene, and that he performed tests that established a match between that blood and a blood sample taken from the defendant. Is the testimony of the chemist admissible?
While serfdom and indentured servitude were justified mostly by economic principles, slavery and the encomienda system were justified most by A. Racist principles B. Regional practices C. Religious principles D. Agriculture practices
Answer:
While serfdom and indentured servitude were justified mostly by economic principles, slavery and the encomienda system were justified most by Racist principles.- A.
Mark drinks about a fifth of ??? bourbon each day but denies that he’s an alcoholic. When his wife suggests that he should seek treatment, he angrily replies, “I hold down a job just fine. Drinking just doesn’t affect me as much as it does other people. If I had problems at work, then maybe I’d be worried that I have a drinking problem, but I don’t.” What is Mark most likely doing to reduce his level of cognitive dissonance?
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Mark is most likely doing Self Justification to reduce his level of cognitive dissonance.
Explanation:
When a person has some thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, which are inconsistent, especially as relating to behavior decisions and attitude change, it is called as the Cognitive Dissonance.
In this example, Mark is practicing the Self Justification attitude of Cognitive Dissonance, which means he is justifying his wrong act or behavior by giving some inconsistent examples. His this attitude is a self justification attitude.
The _________________ parenting style includes parental warmth, proactive teaching, calm discussion during disciplinary episodes, and interest and involvement in their children and peers' activities.
Answer:
authoritative
Explanation:
The authoritative parenting style includes parental warmth, proactive teaching, calm discussion during disciplinary episodes, and interest and involvement in their children and peers' activities.
The authoritative parenting style involves a balanced approach of warmth and consistent limits, often leading to higher self-esteem, social skills, and academic success in children compared to other parenting styles.
The authoritative parenting style includes parental warmth, proactive teaching, calm discussion during disciplinary episodes, and interest and involvement in their children and peers' activities. This refers to a manner of parenting where parents give children reasonable demands and consistent limits, express warmth and affection, and listen to the child's point of view.
By using this approach, parents support their children's autonomy within reasonable bounds and encourage positive self-concept and socioemotional growth. The authoritative parenting style is linked to various positive outcomes for children, including higher self-esteem, social skills, and often higher academic achievement. It differs from authoritarian parenting, which is stricter and less warm, permissive parenting, which is more lax and indulgent, and uninvolved parenting, which is characterized by a lack of responsiveness to the child's needs.
Reaction formation refers to the process by which people:
a.disguise unaccapetable unconscious impulses by attributing them to others
b. consciously express feelings that are the opposite of unaccapetable unconsious impulses
c. retreat to behavior patterns characteristic of an earlier stage of development
d. offer self-justifying explanations in place of the but unaccaptable unconsious reasons for action
Answer: b. consciously express feelings that are the opposite of unacceptable unconscious impulses
Explanation:
Reaction formation is known to be an act of behaving in a way and manner which is completely different from how someone wanted to act or behave. Thus, it is a form of defense mechanism which makes an individual to feel that their feelings or actions are unacceptable in the society and as a result, express their feelings or actions in opposite way which is acceptable.
Reaction formation is a defense mechanism where people manage anxiety by expressing the opposite feelings or behaviors of their unaccepted or anxiety-inducing impulses.
Explanation:Reaction formation is a psychological term that falls under the classification of defense mechanisms. Defense mechanisms are unconscious strategies that people use to manage anxiety or distress in themselves. Specifically, reaction formation is the process by which individuals avoid confronting unaccepted or anxiety-inducing impulses by expressing feelings or behaviors that are directly opposite. Therefore, in the context of your question, the correct answer would be option b: Reaction formation refers to the process by which people consciously express feelings that are the opposite of unacceptable unconscious impulses.
Learn more about Reaction formation here:https://brainly.com/question/31846451
#SPJ6
When Joe did really well on his first sales presentation, he said it was because he worked hard on it. When he did poorly on his second sales presentation, he said it was because the computer and projector were not working properly. Joe’s explanations about his two sales presentations reveal a
Answer:
Self serving bias
Explanation:
Self serving biases are explanitons that people form when a situation has an unfavorable outcome. Instead of blaming themselves, individuals will find an external factor to blame for their failures, in this case the external factor is the computer/projector, while in reality it is joe who is to blame for his short comings.
A _____ is a way of expressing the relationship of a number, quantity, substance, or degree between two components
Answer:
A ratio is a way of expressing the relationship of a number, quantity, substance, or degree between two components.
A Ratio is an approach to communicating the relationship of a number, amount, substance, or degree between two parts. Under the name of extent comes what is consistent and brought together and separable just into more modest detachable, for example, matter, mass, energy, fluid, material all instances of non-aggregate things.
What is a Quantity?Quantity or sum is a property that can exist as a huge number or greatness, which delineate irregularity and progression.
Quantity is among the essential classes of things alongside quality, substance, change, and connection. A few amounts are such by their internal nature (as number), while others capability as states (properties, aspects, credits) of things like weighty and light, long and short, wide and limited, little and extraordinary, or much and little.
Under the name of large number comes what is broken and discrete and separable eventually into indivisibles, for example, armed force, armada, herd, government, organization, party, individuals, wreck (military), tune, group, and number; all which are instances of aggregate things.
Therefore Alongside dissecting its inclination and order, the issues of quantity include such firmly related points as dimensionality, balance, extent etc.
Learn more about Quantity here:
brainly.com/question/12986460
#SPJ2
District
Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been
redistricted
District
A
District
Party 1
Based on this map, what conclusion can someone draw
about who was most likely in charge of the redistricting?
Party 2
District
Party 1
O Party 2
O neither party
the federal government
Answer:
Party 1.
Explanation:
One could make some educated guesses based on the distribution of the districts and the parties that control them.
What is redistricting?If one party controls a significantly larger number of districts than the other, it could be inferred that they had more influence in the redistricting process. Additionally, if the districts appear to be drawn in a way that benefits one party over the other, it could suggest that they had more control over the process.
However, without additional information about the political landscape and the specific redistricting process that took place, it would be premature to definitively attribute responsibility for the redistricting to a particular entity or group.
It is possible that the redistricting was done by a non-partisan commission or that a court ordered the redistricting for reasons unrelated to political power.
Learn more about redistricting here
https://brainly.com/question/23858494
#SPJ7
Which of the following was the strongest motivation for the European powers, such as England and France, to explore and make territorial claims in the Americas? Catholic rulers feared the potential of a massive Protestant empire to crush their own empire and faith. They witnessed and felt threatened by the growing value of Spain's colonial economy and trade. It was the only way to protect their shipping and trade with the native populations in the New World. Monarchs saw the opportunity to incorporate thousands of American Indians as taxpaying citizens.
Answer:
Option B. One of the strongest motivation for the European powers, such as England and France, to explore and make territorial claims in the Americas was that they witnessed and felt threatened by the growing value of Spain's colonial economy and trade.
Explanation:
The European colonization of the Americas began in 1492 when the Italian explorer Christopher Columbus landed, by mistake, in what was going to be known as "The New World". Although Italian by birth, Columbus was sponsored to do his voyage by the Spanish crown, and after his first trip to the new continent, a series of other Spanish travelers started to colonize different regions of America. This gave Spain a huge growing value based on trade and a new way of economic ruling, and sooner than later other powers of Europe like England and France decided it was their time to conquer some of the New World, so that their own power would not be diminished by the Spanish's conquering wave. In the end, England and France were mainly settled in what is now known as North America, while Spain controlled the rest of the region.
Answer:
option B!
Explanation:
What is the safest mode of transportation?
Health records that aren't available between hospitals and medical offices are considered lacking
A. communication.
B. contact.
C. interoperability.
D. correspondence.
Answer:
C. interoperability.
Explanation:
Interoperability is the ability of two different computer or electronical systems to use the information of the other for its own benefit, for examples two different hospitals that have information about a patient and have the medical records, if that patient goes to other hostipal with interoperabilty thay can see his or her medical records.
A backgammon player was upset after losing a match against the club champion. Rushing out of the club, he inadvertently grabbed the champion's board, which looked very much like his own but which was much more expensive. The player left the backgammon board in the trunk of his car, as was his usual practice. During the night, the car was stolen and along with it, the champion's expensive backgammon board.In an action by the champion against the player to recover the value of the backgammon board, is the champion likely to recover?A Yes, because when the player took the backgammon board he committed a trespass to the champion's chattel.B Yes, because when the backgammon board was stolen along with the car, the player became liable for conversion of the champion's chattel.C No, because the player believed in good faith that the board was his when he took it from the backgammon club.D No, because the backgammon board was lost through no fault of the player's.
Answer: the correct answer is B. Yes, because when the backgammon board was stolen along with the car, the player became liable for conversion of the champion's chattel
Explanation:
Conversion consists of (i) an act by defendant interfering with plaintiff's right of possession in the chattel (ii) intent to perform the act bringing about the interference with plaintiff's right of possession (iii) causation and (iv) damages. Therefore, the player was guilty of conversion.
The champion is unlikely to recover the value of the backgammon board from the player, given the circumstances of a good faith mistake and the unintended theft of the board. Legal concepts such as trespass to chattel and conversion have specific requirements that do not seem to apply in this situation.
In the scenario where the backgammon player took the champion's board by mistake and then had it stolen from his car, the issue at hand is whether the champion could recover the value of the board from the player. This legal question revolves around the concepts of trespass to chattel and conversion. Trespass to chattel is an intentional interference with the possession of personal property of another without consent, while conversion is a wrongful exercise of dominion and control over the personal property of another in a manner inconsistent with the owner's rights.
Option C states, "No, because the player believed in good faith that the board was his when he took it from the backgammon club." This reflects the defense of mistake which, in certain cases, can be a valid defense against the claim of trespass to chattels, since the player did not intentionally interfere with the champion's property rights.
However, the inevitability of the car being stolen and the backgammon board with it does not automatically impose liability on the player for conversion of chattel. For conversion to occur, there must be an intentional act that deprives the owner of possession or use of their property. Since the player did not intend to deprive the champion of their property, and the theft of the car was an unforeseen event outside the player's control, it is less likely for a claim for conversion to succeed.
Thus, based on the given facts, the answer would likely be "No," either due to the player's good faith mistake (Option C) or because the loss occurred without the player's fault (Option D).
Congress passes legislation that requires all people to have health insurance or pay fines to the government. The president analyzes the legislation and signs it. Several different individuals challenge the law as unconstitutional, and the United States Supreme Court agrees to hear the case. After the hearing, the justices declare that the law is constitutional. This is an example of:
Answer:
The system of checks and balances.Explanation:
The system of check and balances is the system whereby all three branches of the government (the legislative, the executive and the judicial) oversees, check, limit the other so no parts abuse from their powers.
Through this system, each branch can respond to the action of the other, and one example that exemplifies it best is the process of passing laws: When Congress passes a bill, it goes to the President for signature. If the President signs it, it becomes a law, but if they veto the bill, then the bill is sent back to Congress to have a chance of overriding the Presidential veto with enough votes. Lastly, once legislation is enacted and is being enforced, the Supreme Court (who has the authority to hear special cases) has the power of Judicial Review, that is to say, the ability to review the bill and determine whether it is unconstitutional. This is exactly the process outlined in the statement provided.
A plaintiff sued a defendant for defamation, asserting in her complaint that the defendant had called the plaintiff a thief in front of a number of business associates. The plaintiff calls two witnesses to the stand, both of whom testify that they heard the defendant refer to the plaintiff as a thief in front of the business associates. The plaintiff does not take the stand herself. The defendant pleads truth of the statement as an affirmative defense and calls a witness to the stand. The defense witness is prepared to testify that he was a co-worker of the plaintiff when the plaintiff supplemented her income by tending bar three nights a week. The witness will testify that he saw the plaintiff take a $20 bill from the tavern's cash register and secrete the money in her pocket. The plaintiff's attorney objects.May the defense witness's testimony be allowed?A Yes, as substantive evidence that the plaintiff is, in fact, a thief.B Yes, because theft is a crime indicating dishonesty.C No, because specific bad acts may not be used to show bad character.D No, because the plaintiff never took the stand.
Answer:
The answer is A: "Yes, as substantive evidence that the plaintiff is, in fact, a thief"
No, because specific bad acts may not be used to show bad character. This quote illustrates how gender stereotypes can lead to incorrect assumptions about a person's abilities and goals. The option (C) is correct.
Under the rules of evidence, allowing testimony about specific bad acts to show a person's character is generally not admissible. In this case, the defense witness's testimony concerning a specific incident where the plaintiff allegedly stole $20 would be considered as attempting to show the plaintiff's character rather than the truth of the defamation claim.
This situation highlights the importance of following legal rules and standards in the admission of evidence during a trial to ensure fairness and uphold the principles of justice.
A preschool teacher's class gets angry when she pours identical cartons of juice into different shaped glasses. According to Piaget's theory, in which way should the teacher BEST react to the class?
Answer: The teacher should buy the same-sized glasses, as children at this age can't understand conservation.
Explanation:
The understanding of conservation is the ability of a person to recognize that the amount of a substance does not depend on its content despite being able to adjust to various containers, that is if we have 1/2 liter of juice regardless of size or Container form the amount of juice will remain 1/2 liter.
However, the recognition of this implies a logical thought that is not yet developed in preschool children, it develops between 7 and 11 years, this according to the theory developed by the psychologist Jean Piaget.
I hope this information can help you.
___________ represents the degree to which members of the society accept a hierarchical or unequal distribution of power in organizations and society and reflects on the relationship between superiors and subordinates.
Answer: Power distance
Explanation:
Power distance is known to be how members of a particular society or organisation believe that power is not equally and evenly shared in the society and among colleagues and subordinate within an organisation. Power distance exist in societies or organisations where resources are available to limited set of people who are in high class and information is hidden from the lower class of people or lower rank staffs.
Which insanity standard states that if defendants know that what they were doing was wrong, but they could not help themselves, or if they were unable to control their actions, then they may not be held accountable for their offense?
Answer: It is called irresistible impulse standard.
Explanation:
In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a defense by excuse, in this case some sort of insanity, in which the individual states that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions that broke the law, because they were not able to control those actions, even if they knew them to be wrong.
The leaks began at about two or three. The first was in the corner of Nademah’s bedroom. Zeitoun went down to the garage and retrieved a forty-gallon garbage can to catch the water. Another leak opened a few minutes later, this one in the upstairs hallway. Zeitoun found another garbage can. A window in the master bedroom broke just after three o’clock, as if a brick had been thrown through the glass. Zeitoun gathered the shards and stuffed the opening with a pillow. Another leak opened in Safiya and Aisha’s room. He found another, bigger garbage can. What conclusion can readers draw about this character vs.nature conflict?
Answer:
D-Faced with the storm’s brutality, Zeitoun is resourceful and determined.
Explanation:
Faced with the storm’s brutality, Zeitoun is resourceful and determined.
Answer:
it's D on edg
Explanation:
How long do you have to wait for chloraprep to dry before draping?
Answer:
three minutes
Explanation:
Do not drape or use an ignition source (e.g., cautery, laser) until the solution is completely dry (allow it to dry for a minimum of three minutes on hairless skin; up to one hour in hair). Avoid getting solution into hairy areas, as wet hair is flammable. Hair may take up to one hour to dry.
The use of synthetic marijuana is legal in the state of georgia. TRUE OR FALSE
Answer:
false
Explanation:
In a study about attitudes towards higher education, four subjects are asked to rank the relative importance of higher education. All four participants rank higher education as "very important" or "extremely important" on the survey. Which of the following participants is most likely to experience cognitive dissonance as a part of this response?
A. A master electrician who has significant advanced on-the-job training but no degree
B. A day laborer whose own education stopped at seventh grade and whose family includes no one who has attended any college
C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to "save all that wasted tuition money"
D. A university professor with two doctoral degrees who has actively advocated for significant reform in the country's higher education system
C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to "save all that wasted tuition money"
Explanation:The reason why answer choice "C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to 'save all that wasted tuition money'" would be the correct answer because the high school teacher would have a "cognitive dissonance" in his response.
Cognitive dissonance is is having 2 or multiple beliefs in a topic, in this case, the high school teacher would have 2 beliefs in the topic of higher education.
The high school teacher believes that higher education is very important and that people need to get a higher education, but he tells his own son that the tuition that is going into college is "wasted money." This shows that the high school teacher has cognitive dissonance because he has two different beliefs. He believes that higher education is very important, but doesn't want his own son to pursue it because of the tuition costs.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!I need help ASAP please
a computer in every home - Bill Gates
a higher purpose through animation - Walt Disney
a motorcar for the multitude - Henry Ford
sell dreams instead of products - Steve Jobs
Hope this helps.
r3t40