Answer:
True
Explanation:
What were the effects of the war effort on the freedoms of people in the United States?
Speaker’s background knowledge: for martin luther king i have a dream speech
Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'I Have a Dream' speech during the March on Washington in 1963 is iconic in American history for its powerful call for racial equality and harmony. King's prophetic rhetoric and repeated refrain deeply resonated with the momentous civil rights movement and marked a pivotal point in the fight against racial injustice.
Explanation:Background Knowledge for Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream' Speech
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'I Have a Dream' speech is a monumental oration in American history that called for an end to racial injustice and envisioned an integrated and harmonious society. Delivered on August 28, 1963, during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, it became the hallmark of the civil rights movement. King utilized prophetic rhetoric, akin to biblical prophecy, to passionately express his vision of equality and justice. This rhetoric resonated powerfully with his audience, as it was highly symbolic and tied closely to the American values of freedom and democracy. The March was also an occasion to call on the federal government to pass sweeping civil rights legislation and to highlight the economic disparities faced by African Americans.
The gathering itself was significant, as it was one of the largest political rallies for human rights in United States history with approximately 250,000 participants. King's address remains an iconic moment not only for the impact it made in promoting civil rights, but also for the sheer poetic power it demonstrated. His repeated refrain, 'I have a dream,' underscored a hopeful, persistent vision of social change that echoed across the nation and influenced subsequent civil rights action. This speech is often remembered as the turning point in the fight against racial segregation and injustice, placing civil rights at the forefront of the national agenda and marking the high point of the nonviolent civil disobedience movement.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Which word or phrase indicates that incorporation was not yet in practice following the ratification of the Bill of Rights?
Congress
establishment of religion
prohibiting
free exercise
The correct answer is A) Congress.
The word or phrase that indicates that incorporation was not yet in practice following the ratification of the Bill of Rights is "Congress."
The excerpt says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
So when the text says "Congress," it meant that it was the branch of the United States government that had the faculty or the decision to make laws. In this case, it was Congress that could have the legal means to make a law and enforce it. But as stated in the Bill of Rights, Congress will never make a law that forces American citizens to profess a specific religion.
By launching the air war against North Vietnam, the United States wanted North Vietnam to _____.
A. Stop supporting the insurgency in South Vietnam
B. Stop supporting the Chinese Communists
C. Stop attacking American warships
D. Stop building factories
how did the war of 1812 help the united states
What sort of state of society developed in china after the mongols were ousted?
The practice of enclosure helped increase farm outputs by
A. creating employment for farm laborers.
B. making it possible to plant seeds in rows.
C. reclaiming rich farmland from the sea.
D. increasing the land available for agriculture.
The practice of enclosure, which consolidated small landholdings into larger farms during 18th-century England, led to an increase in farming efficiency, particularly by making it possible to plant seeds in rows, thereby benefiting weeding, planting, and harvesting processes, and ultimately increasing farm outputs.
Explanation:The practice of enclosure in history refers to the process of consolidating small landholdings into a smaller number of larger farms in England during the 18th century. This practice was intended to increase efficiency in farming. One of the main advantages of enclosure was making it possible to plant seeds in rows. Before enclosure, seeds were scattered on the ground by hand, a practice known as broadcast sowing. With tracts of land enclosed and privately owned, it became feasible to implement row planting. This method was more efficient as it allowed for easier weeding, planting, and harvesting, and therefore, increased farm outputs. So, the correct answer is B: making it possible to plant seeds in rows.
Learn more about Enclosure here:https://brainly.com/question/36446706
#SPJ6
Which statement describes the Western Roman Empire after the Pax Romana? (4 points)
The Empire enjoyed a golden age of advancements in the arts and sciences.
The Empire suffered from political and economic instability.
The Empire was extremely wealthy and prosperous.
The Empire was weakened by a series of natural disasters.
Answer:
the answer is B
Explanation:
After US entry into the “Great War,” great emphasis was placed on ensuring unanimous support for the war, aka“100% Americanism.“ How and why did this emphasis turn into suppression of ideas and people, and what were the Constitutional ramifications? Is suppression of free speech and civil liberties in general ever justified?
Identify how many distinct classes there were in Rome.
The answer is (In Rome, there were two distinct classes.)
What was a primary motive behind the implementation of sharia in Islamic empires beginning in the 8th century
Final answer:
The primary motive for implementing sharia in Islamic empires was to establish a cohesive system for regulating legal, economic, and social activities under a unified religious framework, which promoted stability and prosperity.
Explanation:
A primary motive behind the implementation of sharia in Islamic empires starting in the 8th century was to provide a unified system of religious and legal guidance.Sharia law, derived from the Quran, Hadith, precedent, and interpretation, was utilized to regulate everyday aspects of life, including economics, politics, family life, and society. This common framework fostered social solidarity, economic stability through regulated trade, and served as a foundation for governance.In terms of governance, the Sharia council was tasked with formulating regulations and managing judicial affairs according to Islamic laws. Sharia's commercial aspects particularly improved trade, codifying longstanding practices into a moral imperative of religious righteousness. Under the caliphates, areas like maritime safety were enhanced, which allowed for a prosperous trading environment.Overall, the implementation of Sharia enriched Islamic societies by merging temporal and worldly activities with theological exegesis, mirroring the entwined nature of religious and personal life for Muslims at the time.This legal system offered the Islamic empires a robust structure that helped them thrive intellectually, culturally, and economically during periods that were otherwise known in Europe as the Dark Ages.In tge 1930s the industry made a change from analog to ?
Answer:
the correct answer is digital
Explanation:
At the end of he 1800s why did people fear that China might be split into different imperialist colonies
Which of the following terms is the process in which employees negotiate with labor unions about hours, wages, and other working conditions? A. court packing. B. collective bargaining. C. sit-down strike. D. pump priming.
Answer:
B. Collective bargaining.
Explanation:
A labor union is a collective figure that, for more than two centuries has, represented the rights of workers to demand better working conditions and higher and more dignified wages. The way that a labor union secures these objectives is through collective bargaining, in which there is a negotiation between employers and the group of employees banded together under the flag of their labor union.
What did Muhammad's victory battles against Mecca indicate to his followers?
Mecca was an unworthy opponent.
Wars are the only way to resolve issues.
Muhammad was a fierce warrior.
God supported the Islamic cause.
The answer of the question above is:
God supported the Islamic cause.
Explanation: The triumphant battles of Muhammad against Mecca signifies that the Islamic cause was supported by God. The followers believed that Islam was the only true religion meant to spread across the world.
Answer:
God supported the Islamic cause
Explanation:
In 2000, a french court ordered yahoo! to block access by french people to
In 2000, a french court ordered Yahoo ! to block access by french people to block French web users from its auction websites which sell Nazi memorabilia.
A court is any individual or body, frequently a government agency, that has the power to decide legal disputes and administer justice in civil, judicial, and governmental cases in line with the requirements.
In a historic decision, a French ordered by the court the internet behemoth Yahoo! to prevent French web users from accessing its amazon that sell Nazi artifacts. The ruling put an end to a seven-month legal dispute that was initiated by various anti-racism organizations that claimed the San Francisco corporation had trivialized the Atrocities. This was done to make sure that the data and the information was not transfered.
Learn more about court, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ12
Which term did Winston Churchill use to describe the division between soviet-dominated eastern Europe and democratic western Europe that occurred after WWII?
Answer:
iron curtain
Explanation:.
What us city grew because of a superior situation that was enhanced by the opening of the erie canal in 1825? boston new york city baltimore philadelphia?
both Spartans and Athenians encouraged travel abroad. true or false
Answer:
b
Explanation:
"which country in subsaharan africa has spent the last few decades recovering from its former policy of apartheid, or racial separation"
How did the actions of Tiberius Gracchus change the Roman Republic?
The actions of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus challenged the power and traditions of the Roman Republic, resulting in a divide between populares and optimates factions and paving the way for the downfall of the Republic.
Explanation:Tiberius Gracchus, as a tribune, proposed a law in 133 BCE to distribute public land to landless Romans. This threatened the senatorial class, who stood to lose land, and challenged elite control over high political institutions. Tiberius's actions resulted in the assembly voting in favor of his proposal, but the Senate declared a state of emergency and Tiberius was beaten to death.
Gaius Gracchus, Tiberius's brother, also became a tribune and implemented measures to win support from poor Roman farmers, such as establishing new colonies and providing free grain. He also proposed a new court system to try senators for corruption. The Senate took action to subdue Gaius, resulting in violence and his eventual death.
The actions of both Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus challenged the power and traditions of the Roman Republic's senatorial class, leading to a divide between populares and optimates factions and paving the way for the downfall of the Republic.
Learn more about The actions of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus in challenging the senatorial class and implementing reforms in the Roman Republic. here:https://brainly.com/question/9384789
#SPJ12
Read the article titled "Polar Bear Protection Program." Polar bears live across the Arctic, in an area that includes Alaska and Canada. What problems are threatening the polar bears’ habitat? (Site 2)
Which idea comes from the Enlightenment and is reflected in the Constitution? O A. Governmental authorities get their power from God. O B. State and federal governments should share power. O C. The powers of government should be divided. O D The most efficient government is one given the most flexibility to act.
Which of the following statements about ethnic groups in South and Southeast Asia is true? A. Most Dravidians live in northern India. B. Most Indo-Aryans live in southern India. C. Most Javanese live in Indonesia. D. Most Khmer live in Nepal.
Answer:
the answer is C
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Place the following events in chronological order. Tiles the Sepoy Rebellion formation of the British East India Company complete British colonization of India formation of the Indian National Congress Sequence
The start of the Korean War in 1950 is MOST associated with which of these?
A) the Great Depression
B) the spread of Communism
C) the spread of Nazi governments
D) the invasion by the Soviet Union
Answer:
B) the spread of Communism
Explanation:
This is because was about communism spreading to Korea. The U.S helped out the South side of Korea, but North Korea is still communist to this day, while South Korea has an anti-communist government.
Discuss the ways in which the Mongol imperium enhanced contacts, particularly between China and the Islamic world. Which areas received the most benefit from these exchanges?
The Mongol Empire under the Yuan dynasty significantly expanded trade links between China and the Islamic world, leading to economic benefits and the exchange of cultures and ideas. The region that benefited most was East Asia, particularly China, as well as regions of the Islamic world stretching from Persia through central Asia. This increase in trade also facilitated the spread of Buddhism on the Silk Roads and led to the rise of powerful states like Indonesia.
Explanation:The Mongol Empire, particularly during the Yuan dynasty, significantly expanded connections and exchanges between China and the Islamic world. China became the nominal capital of the empire, and the policy of tolerance and support for trade and religious diversity under the Mongols attracted many foreign traders to China. These policies boosted commerce and improved the lives and fortunes of merchants.
The Mongols also created peace treaties and embraced foreign rule, which made travel and trade more secure and beneficial for many, a period also called the Pax Mongolica. This also enabled the long-distance exchange of goods, people, and ideas.
The areas that received the greatest benefit from these exchanges were East Asia, particularly China, and the region controlled by the Islamic world stretching from Persia through central Asia. Increased trade had immense cultural impacts, such as the transmission of Buddhism along the Silk Roads from India to China. This led to the emergence of powerful states, such as Indonesia, with large Muslim populations.
Learn more about Mongol Empire here:https://brainly.com/question/32441270
#SPJ12
How does Millar’s description of the Roman government compare to Polybius’ description?
The following text is from The Crowd in the Late Republic, written by Professor
Fergus Millar in 1998. The book focuses on the role of Roman people in the
government during the final decades of the Roman Republic. Millar is a British
historian and professor of Ancient History at Oxford University.
the Greek historian Polybius in his book The Histories written between 167-119 BCE, a period of rapid Roman expansion. Polybius greatly admired the Romans, and the purpose of his work was to describe how Rome came to dominate the world.
Based on this information, the difference between Millar's description and Polybius' description is the fact that Millar is a modern scholar and based on his description, he is more likely to be objective in his assessment of the Roman Empire. Polybius is an ancient scholar, and a great admirer of the Roman empire. These two qualities suggest that he might be less objective when analyzing the history of the empire.
Millar's description emphasizes the influence of the crowd and tribunes in late Republic politics, whereas Polybius praises the mixed constitution of monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy. Both perspectives highlight different aspects contributing to the stability and success of the Roman government.
In the document “The Crowd in the Late Republic, 1998” by Fergus Millar, Millar provides a detailed analysis of the Roman government, highlighting the influence of the common people and the complexities of political life in the late Roman Republic.
On the other hand, Polybius, an ancient Greek historian, offered his vivid description of the Roman government, praising it for its balanced mix of democracy, oligarchy, and monarchy.
Millar's Description:
Millar focuses on the significant role of the crowd in influencing political decisions. He emphasizes that public assemblies and mass meetings were crucial aspects of the political process in the late Republic.He also notes the growing power of tribunes and their ability to leverage popular support for political initiatives.The detailed account provides insights into the turbulent and often chaotic nature of Roman politics during this period.Polybius's Description:
Polybius describes the Roman government as a superior system due to its unique blend of monarchy (through consuls), oligarchy (through the Senate), and democracy (through assemblies and the people's tribunes).He believed that this mixed constitution was key to the stability and success of the Roman Republic, allowing it to govern vast territories effectively.His admiration stemmed from the idea that this balance prevented any single group from gaining too much power.Impact on Modern Democracy
The Roman Republic's system influenced modern democratic principles, particularly the idea of checks and balances, the separation of powers, and the role of citizen participation in governance.Constitutional mechanisms in many modern democracies, such as the United States, reflect these republican principles to ensure balanced and fair governance.Complete Question:
In the document “The Crowd in the Late Republic, 1998.” By Fergus Millar
How does Millar's description of the Roman government compare to Polybius's description?
Upon reflection, did the Populist Party make a wise decision in choosing to support the Democratic Party’s candidate in the 1896 presidential election? Why or why not?
The Populist Party's decision to support William Jennings Bryan in the 1896 election is contentious. While they aligned with a candidate who shared their economic perspectives, their inability to offer a distinctive platform led to a loss of momentum and eventual assimilation into the two-party system after the election.
Explanation:Upon reflection, it's debatable whether the Populist Party made a wise decision in supporting the Democratic Party's candidate, William Jennings Bryan, in the 1896 presidential election. The Populists had initially achieved significant success in the 1892 election, gaining legislative seats and advocating for a platform distinct from the major parties, largely focusing on the needs of farmers and laborers.
By 1896, economic issues, particularly the gold standard, were at the forefront of the national conversation. The Populists strongly supported Bryan because of his opposition to the gold standard, evidenced by his 'Cross of Gold' speech, and his advocacy of the silver standard.
Nevertheless, their alliance with the Democrats came at a cost. Bryan's loss to William McKinley marked the beginning of the end for the Populist Party on a national scale, as they struggled to differentiate themselves from the Democrats. Post-election, many of their reforms were absorbed by the major parties, diluting the Populists' impact.
Moreover, local Populist parties saw a substantial decline by 1900, integrating into the growing two-party system in America.
Final answer:
The Populist Party's decision to support the Democratic Party's candidate in the 1896 presidential election can be seen as both wise and unwise. Supporting William Jennings Bryan allowed the Populists to align themselves with a candidate who shared their goals, but it also risked losing their identity as a separate third party.
Explanation:
The Populist Party's decision to support the Democratic Party's candidate, William Jennings Bryan, in the 1896 presidential election can be seen as both wise and unwise.
On one hand, Bryan was a strong advocate for the silver standard, which was a key issue for the Populists. By endorsing Bryan, the Populists were able to align themselves with a candidate who shared their goals and could potentially implement their proposed reforms.
However, endorsing Bryan also meant that the Populists risked losing their identity as a separate third party. By aligning themselves with the Democrats, the Populists could be swallowed up by the larger party and lose their influence and distinct platform.
Which of the following was not a radical group that began to gain popularity during the 1930’s? a. communism c. capitalism b. socialism d. fascists
Answer:
c
Explanation: