For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not have to prove that the employee was receiving a benefit from the criminal act.
Option e
Explanation:
An entity that exists only through its employees and their functions is called as an corporation. Although, a corporation may be held liable for various criminal activities, for example: the employee did that criminal act in the scope of employment, the failure in performing an affirmative duty.
Corporations must perform certain responsibilities and duties to which they are bound to, if unable to perform those duties, it may result in criminal liability. However, a criminally liable company's prosecutor does not have to prove that the "employee was trying to receive some benefit from the criminal act".
For a corporation to be held criminally liable, the prosecutor does not need to prove that the employee personally benefited from the act; they must establish other key elements related to the scope of employment and the benefit to the corporation.
Explanation:For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not have to prove that the employee was receiving a benefit from the criminal act. Therefore, the correct answer is e. that the employee was receiving a benefit from the criminal act. Other key elements that must generally be demonstrated include that the employee was acting within the scope of employment, the act was intended to benefit the corporation, and the act can be imputed to the corporation. The punishment for corporate crime may vary, but it is important to note that a corporation, as with natural persons, can be held responsible for crimes such as fraud and manslaughter, highlighting the concept of corporate liability.
The statute of frauds requires certain types of contracts to be in writing. All of these contracts must be in writing except
The Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing, but there is one exception known as part performance.
Explanation:The Statute of Frauds is a legal doctrine that requires certain contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable. These contracts include agreements for the sale of land, contracts that cannot be performed within one year, contracts to pay someone else's debt, and contracts for the sale of goods over a certain value. However, there is one exception to the Statute of Frauds, and that is the doctrine of part performance. Part performance occurs when one party has already partially fulfilled their obligations under an oral contract, and the other party would be unjustly enriched if the contract were not enforced.
In order to initiate a civil lawsuit in a federal court or in a state court, what must you do?
Answer:
I will file a complaint and 'serve' a copy of the complaint to the defendant.
Explanation:
In order to initiate a civil lawsuit in a federal court or in a state court involves the following process.
First, FILING OF COMPLAINTS; the plaintiff files a complaint with the court and “serves” a copy of the complaint on the defendant.
The plaintiff may seek money to compensate for the damages, or may ask the court to order the defendant to stop the conduct that is causing the harm.
Second, THE CASE PREPARATION; litigants must provide information to each other about the case, such as the identity of witnesses and copies of any documents related to the case.
And the trial process.
New State passes a law prohibiting the importation of out-of-state apples in order to help in-state growers. Which of the following is the best argument for the out-of-state growers who wish to challenge the new law?
a. That it violates the dormant commerce clause
b. That it violates the explicit preemption clause
c. That it violates the First Amendment
d. That it violates the Fourth Amendment
e. That it violates due process
It violates the dormant commerce clause is the best argument for the out-of-state growers who wish to challenge the new law.
Option a
Explanation:
The dormant commerce clause states that any state must not discriminate between other state's commerce systems or competitions. This clause also limits the power that individual states have on these matters. It is used by the judiciary to overturn the "state regulation of commerce and trade".
In recent years, the dormant commerce clause has been a subject of resurgence of both scholarly and judicial concern. In the given example, the state passing a law to limit the introduction of out of state grown apples violating the "dormant commerce clause" for which the out of state apple growers can challenge the new law which has been imposed by the new state.
Final answer:
The best argument for out-of-state growers challenging the new State law is that it violates the dormant commerce clause, as this clause prevents states from establishing laws that unduly burden or discriminate against interstate trade in favor of in-state economic interests.
Explanation:
The best argument for the out-of-state growers who wish to challenge the new law prohibiting the importation of out-of-state apples to help in-state growers is that it violates the dormant commerce clause. The commerce clause, as well as the supremacy clause, prohibits states from establishing laws that discriminate against or excessively burden interstate commerce. In this case, the State law is favoring in-state economic interests over out-of-state competitors by restricting the importation of out-of-state goods, which is precisely the type of state legislation that the dormant commerce clause is intended to prevent. Such a law could be seen as a regulatory measure that has the purpose or effect of protectionism, which the dormant commerce clause explicitly prohibits since it would disrupt the free flow of trade among the states.
While there are other constitutional provisions that protect against discrimination and assure fair treatment of individuals and economic entities, such as the privileges and immunities clause, those would not be as directly applicable in this context as the dormant commerce clause. In contrast, the explicit preemption clause, First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, and due process are not the best arguments for this case as they address different constitutional concerns that are not primarily related to interstate commerce.
The powers not delegated to the united states by the constitution
Answer:
The powers not delegated to the united states by the constitution are reserved to the states or to the people.
Explanation:
The foregoing is set forth in the Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution whereby it is implied that the powers that are not granted to the US Federal Government belong to the states. These are also known as reserved powers. The purpose of this provision is to define a division of power between the federal government and state governments. Therefore, the power of the federal government is limited.
Sarah believes that she was rejected for a position at Trekking Travel Agency due to her race. Sarah files a suit against Trekking Travel Agency under Title VII on the basis of disparate-treatment discrimination. Sarah must show all of the following except that_____________.
Answer: option d
Explanation:
This law suite becomes void if Sarah is unable to bring an alibi in the company of victims who are qualified to work in the company but suffered the same fate as she did to back her claims against trekking travel
Answer:
D. Other people of her race hold similar positions with other employers
Explanation:
The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is an act that forbids potential job employers from making unjust prejudicial distinction in the treatment of employees and potential job applicants on the bases of race, color, religion, national origin, and sex.
Title VII is designed to ensure that employment decisions are made based on objective, job-related criteria.
To prove Title VII discrimination, she must show that
She is qualified for the applied position She is a member of a protected class She suffered an unfavorable employment actionShe was subjected to an adverse employment action despite being qualifiedHaving highlighted these, showing that the city allowed other people of her race to hold similar positions with other employers raises an inference of discriminatory action .
Which of the following statements proves the existence of wage discrimination?
(A) Male prison guards earn more on average than female prison guards.
(B) Professor of economics earn more on average than professors of gender studies.
(C) Men earn more on average than women.
(D) All of the above prove the existence of wage discrimination.
(E) None of the above prove the existence of wage discrimination.
Michael Manin, an airline pilot, was twice convicted of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor. To renew his flight certification with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Manin filed an application that asked him about his criminal history. He did not disclose his two convictions. When these came to light more than ten years later, Manin argued that he had not known that he was required to report convictions for minor misdemeanors. The NTSB’s policy was to consider an applicant’s understanding of what information a question sought before determining whether an answer was false. But without explanation, the agency departed from this policy, refused to consider Manin’s argument, and revoked his certification. Was this action arbitrary and capricious?
The NTSB's revocation of Michael Manin's flight certification without considering its own policy on evaluating an applicant's understanding of disclosure requirements could be arbitrary and capricious, although other factors or legal standards might justify their action.
The question at hand involves an evaluation of the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) actions in the context of administrative law. The issue is whether the NTSB's action in revoking Michael Manin's flight certification, for not disclosing minor misdemeanors, was arbitrary and capricious. Under administrative law, an agency action is considered arbitrary and capricious if it is not based on consideration of the relevant factors, is a clear error of judgment, or follows from a decision-making process that lacks coherence. If the NTSB has a policy to consider an applicant's understanding of what is required to be disclosed and deviated from this policy without explanation, that could be seen as arbitrary and capricious action. However, there might also be other factors or legal standards at play, such as the requirement of pilots to have no convictions of a significant misdemeanor, which may have affected the NTSB's decision.
What court case gave the supreme court the power of judicial review
Marbury v. Madison was the case which gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was the case in which the Supreme Court, where the Court asserted its authority for judicial review, calling a law unconstitutional.
In the end of the Judge’s opinion in this judgment, Chief Justice John Marshall explained that this is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to reverse the unconstitutional law because it is necessary result of a Judge’s pledge to maintain the writings of the Constitution as directed in Article 6 in our Constitution.
The Judicial review can be defined as the power of Supreme Court to check and decide in case of a violation of existing law.
Which of the following is a fact-finding jury that determines if a defendant is guilty or not guilty?
a. A grand jury
b. A petit jury
c. A deciding jury
d. An empowered jury
e. A true bill jury
Answer:
b. a petit jury
Explanation:
The library of congress is the responsibility of which governmental branch?
Answer:
The Library of Congress is the responsibility of the Legislative Branch.
Explanation:
The Library of Congress is the US National Library. It is located in three buildings in Washington and is the largest library in the world in terms of shelf meters and book volume.
Founded in 1800, the library is the oldest cultural institution in the United States. On August 24, 1814, British forces burned down the Capitol building where the library was located and destroyed the library's collection of 3,000 works. On January 30, 1815, Congress approved the purchase of Thomas Jefferson's personal collection of 6,487 books for $ 23,950. In 2007, the Library of Congress employed 3,691 people and had a budget of over $ 600 million.
What limits has the supreme court placed on gerrymandering
Answer: The Federal government Authority judges has never been to correct partisan of redrawing electoral district to get electoral advantage. the Supreme Court is used to judging based on a 5-to-4 decision, which allows politicians to only draw electoral districts that brought about their power, unless there are laws preventing them from doing so, which might be congress/state laws.
The conservative majority decision overruled lower courts and also refused two constitutional challenges to partisan district chats.
Answer:
When the boundaries of an electoral constituency are manipulated so as to give advantage to one party of class it is known as Gerrymandering.
"Packing" which means localizing the opposing party's voting power in one district to enervate their voting power in other districts and "cracking" which refers to the art of weakening the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts are two major methods used in gerrymandering.
Explanation:
One example of a gerrymandered US district would be North Carolina's 12th congressional district. Between 2003 and 2016 North Carolina's 12 congressional district was packed. The district has heavily dominated by African-American democrats.
It is the position of the US Supreme Court that redistricting which discriminates on racial or ethnic grounds lacks constitutional backing. However, it has been slow to issue a similarly-strong ruling for partisan redistricting. It is the decision of the Court that unrestrained partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional.
Cheers!
A person who illegally accesses or enters another person's or a company's computer system to obtain information or to steal money is known as a _______.
a. backer
b. reacher
c. hacker
d. trespasser
e. illicit user
Answer:
A person who illegally accesses or enters another person's or a company's computer system to obtain information or to steal money is known as a Hacker. Correct answer is C. Hacker.
Since 1. A person who uses computers to access data without authorization.
2. A person or thing that is roughly hacking or cutting.
Explanation:
Hacking refers to activities aimed at compromising digital devices, such as computers, smartphones, tablets, and even whole networks.
And while hacking may not always be for malicious purposes, nowadays most hacking references and hackers characterize it / them as cybercriminals ' unlawful activity — motivated by financial gain, protest, gathering (spying) information, and even just for the "fun" of the challenge.
A person who illegally accesses or enters another's computer system, typically for malicious purposes, like extracting information or stealing money, is known as a hacker.
Explanation:A person who illegally accesses or enters another person's or a company's computer system with the intent of accessing information or stealing money is known as a hacker. Hackers often exploit weaknesses in security systems or use coding and software skills to bypass security measures, with the intent of unauthorized intrusion. In the realm of cybercrime, hacking can cause significant damage to individuals or businesses from financial loss to privacy invasion.
Learn more about Hacker here:https://brainly.com/question/32413644
#SPJ3
Difference between first degree and second degree murder
Answer:
The main difference between first-degree murder and second-degree murder lies in the previous planification of the murder, made by the person who commits the crime.
In first-degree murder, the murderer plans the crime: he is aware of what he is going to do, and plans the details of how and when to carry out the homicide.
On the other hand, in second-degree murder, although there is also intention and discernment regarding the crime that is being committed, it is not a planned act: it is a voluntary action, but not premeditated.
One weakness of the articles of confederation was that congress could not
Answer:
COULD NOT RAISE TAXES
Explanation:
What weaknesses in the articles of Confederation made a lasting government impossible? The Confederation Congress lacked key powers - it could not raise taxes or regulate trade. The Congress could not make states obey the laws it passed.
The weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that Congress could not raise an army or navy, leaving defense to the states.
Explanation:The Articles of Confederation were the first constitution of the United States, adopted in 1777 and ratified in 1781. They established a loose union of states with a weak central government, leading to issues and ultimately the drafting of the U.S. Constitution in 1787. One weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that Congress could not raise an army or navy.
This was a result of the fear of a standing army controlled by a tyrannical government. Instead, defense was left to the states, which meant that the national government had to rely on the states to provide soldiers. If the states chose not to honor the national government's request, the country would lack adequate defense, which was particularly dangerous during a time when England and Spain still controlled large portions of North America.
Learn more about weakness of the Articles of Confederation here:https://brainly.com/question/11727718
#SPJ12
Ed goes door-to-door selling magazine subscriptions. Ed knows, however, that he is simply taking money for subscriptions and has absolutely no intention of ever arranging for the provision of magazines. Which of the following offenses, if any, has he committed?
a. Defalcation
b. False Entry
c. False token
d. False pretense
e. Ponzi scheme
Answer:
e. Ponzi scheme
Explanation:
e. Ponzi scheme
(e) Ponzi Scheme.
Ponzi Scheme:A Ponzi scheme is a type of scam that entices investors and rewards, previous investors, with earnings from more current investors using their money. The Ponzi scheme, so named after the Italian businessman Charles Ponzi, deceives victims into thinking that their gains are the result of successful business ventures (such as sales of products or wise investments), while keeping them in the dark about the true source of the money. As long as new investors keep putting money in and the majority of investors continue to believe in the fictitious assets they are supposed to possess, a Ponzi scheme can continue to provide the impression that it is a viable business.Therefore, the correct option is (e) A Ponzi scheme.
Know more about Ponzi scheme here:
https://brainly.com/question/14550688
#SPJ2
Hardee's and Carl's Jr. are fast food restaurants. Hardee's operates in the Midwest and Carl's Jr. operates on the West Coast. The two companies decide to merge. Is there a strong chance that the government will block this merger?
Answer:No, the chances that the government will block it is slim
Explanation:
The two restaurants decided to MERGE. MERGING in business means that there is incorporation of two or more companies together to form a single entity in order to achieve further efficiencies and productivities.
There are three (3) main types of merging and they are: HORRIZONTAL MERGING( this increases market share), VERTICAL MERGING(this exploit existing synergies) and finally, the CONCENTRIC MERGING(this expand productivities).
With the two restaurants, it might be because of the the three(3) types of merges.
The government will NOT block the merging because merging because of MARKET EXTENSION does not receive much scrutiny from the government.
What is one of the liberties guaranteed in the bill of rights
Answer:
The right of people to keep and bear arms
Explanation:
The second ammendment
Answer:
The answer is freedom of speech (C)
Explanation:
It's the second amendment
Hope I helped :)
Jodi finds her brother-in-law, Cameron, irritating, but she can't avoid interacting with him because he is married to her sister. This reflects which characteristic of conflict?
A. Incompatible goals
B. An expressed struggle
C. Interdependence
D. Inevitability
The given scenario reflects Interdependence characteristic of conflicts.
Option C
Explanation:The characteristic described here is interdependence. As it is very clear to see that Jodi's sister is married to Cameron. She might not be dependent on Cameron directly but when it comes to her sister she is dependent directly. Clearly establishing a state of interdependency.
This is a very common issue and happens to many people where one can not show contempt to the opposite person as that person is somewhat related to the person which might have a grave affect on other relations as well. Sometimes such interdependency becomes very critical and needs to be resolved soon.
Because U.S. laws tightly regulate the disposal of toxic materials from the thousands of electronic devices discarded each year, some companies have contracted with companies in China and other countries to dispose of these products. Unfortunately, the lack of regulation in these countries has resulted in unsafe disposal practices, creating toxic waste areas where drinking water and soil are no longer safe. This situation illustrates the concept of:
Answer: Social dumping
Explanation:
Social dumping is employers ' method of using cheaper labor than is usually available at their production or sales site. In the latter case, it hires migrant workers; in the former, it transfers production to a low-wage country or area. Therefore, the company will save money and potentially increase its profit. Systemic analysis indicates that governments are therefore forced to participate in a so-called social policy system by increasing their labor and social standards in order to ease labor costs for businesses and maintain business activity within their jurisdiction.
Entities derived from social dumping:
companies in importing countries Participants in importing countries Customers in importing countries Industry in importing markets Employment in exporting countries Government and investment in exporting countriesWhich of the following was created specifically to combat white-collar crime?
a. The Racketeer Influenced and Corruption Organizations Act
b. The False Claims Act
c. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
d. The White-Collar Enforcement Act
e. None of these
Answer:
c. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (also Sarbox or SOX) is a United States federal law that created new requirements for all U.S. public company boards, management and public accounting firms. This was enacted in 2002 with the purpose of combating white-collar crime. This act was created due to the scandals that surrounded several firms, such as Enron and WorldCom during that time period.
Which of the following is using fraudulent means to obtain information about someone's phone use?
a. Pretexting
b. Ponzi scheme
c. False pretenses
d. False token
e. Defalcation
Answer:
The correct answer to the given question is A. Pretexting
Pretexting is defined as the practice of presenting yourself as someone else for private information purposes.
Explanation:
A Pretext for doing something or saying something that is not true is a justification (adj: pretextual). In the sense of a deceptive lie, pretexts may be based on a half-truth or created. Pretexts have been used to conceal behind actions and words the true purpose or excuse.
Final answer:
The use of fraudulent means to obtain phone use information is known as pretexting. Among the given choices, 'pretexting' is the term that specifically describes this act of identity theft.
Explanation:
The act of using fraudulent means to obtain information about someone's phone use is known as pretexting. Pretexting is a form of identity theft or 'True-name Fraud', where an individual, acting under a false pretense, acquires personal information such as phone records, social security numbers, PIN numbers, or passwords without the owner's consent. This information is then used to steal a person's identity, potentially leading to financial loss and unauthorized transactions. Among the choices given:
Pretexting (a) is the correct answer, as it directly involves fraudulently obtaining personal information.
A Ponzi scheme (b) is a fraudulent investing scam promising high rates of return with little risk.
False pretenses (c) typically involve deception to secure unlawful gain, which might overlap with pretexting but is a broader term in legal contexts.
A False token (d) is an object used to deceive, such as a counterfeit coin.
Defalcation (e) refers to the misappropriation of funds placed in one's trust or belonging to one's employer.
Junk Food. Mary Dogood, a member of the school board in ABC County, is appalled at the amount of junk food in the schools. She convinces the state legislature to pass an ordinance that no stores may sell any unhealthy, junk food within 500 feet of any school or day care center. A teacher of political science raises the issue of whether the regulation is valid and is told that it is a valid exercise of the jurisdiction's police power to protect its citizens. Convenience stores balk at the regulation and challenge it in court. What concept is addressed in regard to the reference to "police power"?
a. The residual powers retained by each state to safeguard the health and welfare of its citizenry
b. The residual powers retained by the federal government to enforce valid laws and regulations
c. The power granted to local government to enter residencies without a search warrant
d. The power granted to state governments to tax for the purposes of having law enforcement
e. The powers granted to state government to imprison citizens of other states who commit crimes within a state
The residual powers retained by each state to safeguard the health and welfare of its citizens is the concept to address in regard to the reference to police power.
Option a
Explanation:
The state's main purpose is to safeguard and protect its citizens from any harm that may be coming in their way. It is there for the welfare of its citizens and for their own good. The state protects its citizens from harms that can come in many ways. It can also impose civil laws and public policies, or police support to cope up with any difficulties.
In the given example, Mary Dogood imposes a ban on junk foods within 500 feet from the school, for a good cause that would save the children from indulging themselves in unhygienic and unhealthy foods, that may harm them and make them fall ill. The police power exercised its role to impose this law correctfully to protect the citizens.
Which court in the federal system is the court of last resort
Answer:
United States Supreme Court
Explanation:
The United States Supreme Court is the court of last resort in the federal court system. Each of the states and the District of Columbia has at least one supreme court, or court of last resort. Oklahoma and Texas both have two courts of last resort, one for civil appeals and one for criminal appeals.
By ruling in james mcculloch’s favor in mcculloch v. Maryland, what was the verdict of this case
Answer:
McCulloch v. Maryland was a decision of the United States Supreme Court. The state of Maryland attempted to prevent a branch of the Second Bank of the United States from operating by imposing a tax on all banknotes of banks not founded in Maryland. The Second Bank of the United States was the only bank then present in the state that had not been founded on it. The Court invoked the Theory of Implicit Powers of the Constitution, which allowed the Federal Government to pass laws that are not expressly provided for in the Constitution, from a list of expressed powers, provided that those laws are useful for Congress's powers, pursuant to Constitution.
Final answer:
The McCulloch v. Maryland verdict ruled in favor of James McCulloch, establishing the principle of national supremacy and confirming that states cannot tax federal entities.
Explanation:
By ruling in James McCulloch's favor in McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court's verdict held that the Congess possessed implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of the Constitution. Moreover, this landmark decision confirmed that the states could not tax the federal government, establishing the principle of national supremacy.
The court's decision not only supported the legality of the Second Bank of the United States (BUS) but also affirmed that federal laws are the supreme law of the land, preventing states from imposing taxes on federal entities as it would undermine the authority of the national government.
The basic purpose of tort law is to punish criminal wrongdoers. True or False
The basic purpose of tort law is to punish criminal wrongdoers is false.
Explanation: The tort law broadly enumerates the punishments against civil wrong committed by an individual or a group of individuals. These 'wrongs' involve acts like trespassing, sale of hazardous products without the necessary prior permissions, causing mental harm to someone, possessing carelessness, etc. The origin of tort laws is found in the ancient Roman laws that were implemented in order to punish the ones found guilty in behavioral crimes.Which of the following was passed largely in response to business scandals of the 2000s, such as Enron?
a. RICO
b. The False Claims Act
c. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
d. The Medicare Recovery Act
e. The Healthcare Fraud Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was passed largely in response to business scandals of the 2000s, such as Enron.
Option c
Explanation:
The Sarbanes Oxley act was passed in 2002 to that helps the investors to escape fraudulent financing. It made strict reforms and actions to anyone violating any rule and engaging in fraudulent activities.
The Sarbanes Oxley act came into existence in 2002 due to the various fraudulent scandals that happened in the 2000's like the Enron Corporation, world.com and many more like them. It imposed strict rules on auditors, accountants, and were forced to keep their records and avoid any frauds.
Organization of petroleum exporting countries definition
Answer: Organization of petroleum exporting countries(OPEC), is a permanent intergovernmental organization of oil-exporting developing nations that focuses on the coordination and unification of the petroleum policies of its Member Countries.
Explanation:
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) was founded in September 1960 in Baghdad, Iraq, with the signing of an agreement by five countries namely Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, to coordinate the petroleum policies of its members and to provide member states with technical and economic aid. OPEC is a cartel that aims to manage the supply of oil in an effort to set the price of oil on the world market, and also, to avoid fluctuations that might affect the economies of both producing and purchasing countries. The chief executive officer of OPEC is its secretary general. His Excellency Mohammad Sanusi Barkindo of Nigeria was appointed to the position for a three-year term of office on August 1, 2016, and re-elected for another three-year on July 2, 2019.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is a cartel consisting of 14 of the world’s major oil-exporting nations. Countries that belong to OPEC include Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela (the five founders), plus the United Arab Republic, Libya, Algeria, Nigeria, and five other countries.
OPEC is a cooperative of oil-exporting countries that collectively regulate oil supply and prices to ensure stable income for members and stable oil prices for consumers. It was established in 1960 and has been influential in the global energy market, especially during the 1970s oil embargoes.
Explanation:The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is an international cooperative established in 1960 by oil-exporting nations. OPEC's primary goal is to coordinate the petroleum policies of its member countries and to provide a stable source of income for the member states while supplying oil to consumers at a stable price. The impact of OPEC has been profound, especially in the 1970s, when it used its collective power to enforce oil embargoes that caused energy crises and led to increased oil prices globally. While most of the member countries are in the Middle East, others like Venezuela, Angola, Nigeria, and Ecuador also play a significant role.
OPEC currently has 15 member countries, which as of 2018 included Algeria, Angola, Congo, Ecuador, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela. These countries have a substantial amount of control over global oil supply since they can influence global production through production quotas. This has allowed OPEC to have a major influence on oil prices worldwide.
For laws against shoplifting, pick at least one of the four grounds for justification—legal moralism, the harm principle, legal paternalism, and the offense principle—and construct an argument designed to justify the law. You may not agree either with the law or with the argument; the exercise is to see if you can connect the law to the (allegedly) justifying principle.
One of the grounds for justification of laws is the harm principle. The harm principle states that the actions of individuals should be prevented when these actions harm others. This is known as the harm principle.
In the case of shoplifting, we can argue that this action harms others. When we shoplift, we damage the owner of the store, as this means that he will lose out on the profits that would have come from the sale of a product. Moreover, this means that other people who were willing to pay for the product will also lose the opportunity to enjoy it. Therefore, shoplifting should be prohibited according to the harm principle.
The policy that kept the united states out of the war for three years was called
Answer:
The neutrality policy.
Explanation:
When the war blowed, President Wilson declared that the United States will follow a strict neutrality policy where it wouldn´t ally with other countries. This policy lasted three years.
How does casework affect members attention to legislation
Answer:
Case study enables the development of awareness of a problem, which leads to more time and resources being focused on related legislation.
Explanation:
In general terms, the case study seeks to analyze a theme observed in reality, explaining how and why it occurs. In addition to identifying the factors that contribute to the theme in question materialize. In this sense, a case study proposes to identify a problem, analyze the evidence, develop logical arguments, evaluate and propose solutions. This allows members of legislation to focus more time and resources on related legislation.
This is one of countless types of research, and it uses qualitative data collection, and this collection can occur through one or more methods, and does not follow a strict line of investigation.