Franklin Corporation is comparing two different capital structures, an all-equity plan (Plan I) and a levered plan (Plan II). Under Plan I, the company would have 185,000 shares of stock outstanding. Under Plan II, there would be 135,000 shares of stock outstanding and $1.92 million in debt outstanding. The interest rate on the debt is 7 percent and there are no taxes. Use MM Proposition I to find the price per share.

Answer:

$2200

Explanation:

will be Lq25.The total cost function is thus given by the sum of the costs of capital, labor, and rawmaterials:TC(q) = rK +wL +2000q = (10,000)(5) + (5,000)(q25) + 2,000 qTC(q) = 50,000 +2200q.The average cost function is then given by:AC(q) TC ( q ) q  50,000  2200 q q . and the marginal cost function is given by: MC ( q )   TC  q  2200.

Answer: 1. 32,000,000. 2. 67% 3. 7.3%

Explanation:Note that if those not employed and not currently searching for jobs were all considered to be marginally attached workers and were included in the unemployment rate calculation, then this would be the U-6 unemployment rate, which is the ratio of unemployed plus marginally attached workers to the labor force plus marginally attached workers, which would be 22%, not 7.3%.

The unemployment rate for Country X can be calculated at 7.3% by dividing the number of unemployed individuals actively searching for work by the total labor force. The labor force participation rate is 64%, found by dividing the labor force by the total population. The employment rate is 59.3%, which represents the proportion of employed individuals within the working-age population.

From the employment data provided for Country X, we can calculate several key statistics that are indicators of the country's economic health, such as the unemployment rate, labor force participation rate, and the proportions of the population that are employed, unemployed, and not in the labor force.

To calculate the unemployment rate, we take the number of individuals who are not employed but currently searching for jobs, which is 2,336,000, and divide it by the sum of this number and the number of individuals who are currently employed, which is 29,664,000. The labor force, therefore, consists of 2,336,000 unemployed plus 29,664,000 employed individuals, which gives us a total labor force of 32,000,000. The unemployment rate is then (2,336,000 / 32,000,000) × 100 = 7.3%.

The labor force participation rate is calculated by taking the labor force, dividing it by the total relevant population, and then multiplying by 100. The total relevant population is 50,000,000. Therefore, the labor force participation rate is (32,000,000 / 50,000,000) × 100 = 64%.

The employment rate, which represents the proportion of the working-age population that is employed, is found by dividing the number of employed individuals by the total relevant population. This result is (29,664,000 / 50,000,000) × 100, which equals 59.3%.

Answer:

BOL can be viewed as the authoritative record that is being given to a shipment organization by the transporter that incorporates the different insights regarding the item. The fundamental purpose behind the BOL to be gathered at the entryway ports is that these BOL are gotten at the port first as this is where the items are gotten in the nation and from that point these items are sent to inland RDCs. The items need to pay the traditions obligations and pass the various customs.

Answer:

1. A) A stock's intrinsic value is based on true risk in the company

2. B) A company that has been distributing a portion of their earnings every quarter for the past six years

3. B) Successful companies benefit consumers

C) Most people have an important stake in the stock market.

Explanation:

1. ..... Based on your understanding of stock prices and intrinsic values, which of the following statements is true?

A) A stock's intrinsic value is based on true risk in the company.

The Intrinsic value of a stock takes into account the market sentiment of a given stock which means that I shows the riskiness of it.

2. Which of the following companies would you choose to evaluate if you were using the discounted dividend model to estimate the value of the company's stock?

B) A company that has been distributing a portion of their earnings every quarter for the past six years.

The Dividend Discount Model uses constant dividends in calculation of stock price so a company that has been paid dividends is very much Preferred than one that isn't.

3. Which of the following describe the reason(s) why maximization of intrinsic stock value benefits society. Check all that apply.

B) Successful companies benefit consumers

C) Most people have an important stake in the stock market.

Successful companies do indeed benefit consumers as they will pass on their wealth as well as paying workers better to stimulate growth.

Also a lot of people are invested in the stock market. Maximising Intrinsic value thus increases worth.

If you need any clarification do react or comment.

Final answer:

The intrinsic value of a stock is based on the company's true risk, and a company that consistently pays dividends is suitable for the discounted dividend model. Maximizing intrinsic stock value benefits society by benefiting consumers and providing job opportunities.

Explanation:

The correct statement regarding a stock's intrinsic value and market price is A) A stock's intrinsic value is based on true risk in the company. The intrinsic value of a stock is an estimate of its true value based on the company's assets, earnings, and potential growth. On the other hand, a stock's market price is determined by the supply and demand in the stock market and can be influenced by factors beyond the company's fundamentals.

If you were using the discounted dividend model to estimate the value of a company's stock, you would choose option B) A company that has been distributing a portion of their earnings every quarter for the past six years. The discounted dividend model calculates the present value of a stock's future dividends, so a company that consistently pays dividends is more suitable for this valuation method.

The reasons why maximization of intrinsic stock value benefits society are: B) Successful companies benefit consumers, C) Most people have an important stake in the stock market, and D) People like to work for companies that minimize operating costs. Successful companies contribute to the economy, provide jobs, and generate wealth for investors and stakeholders, which ultimately benefits society as a whole.

Answer:

Flexible Contribution Margin 147,000

Actual Contribution Margin 139,000

Variance 8000 unfavorable

Explanation:

Engine Works Company

Flexible Budget Performance Report

For the year using the Contribution Margin Format

                                      Actual                      Static                Flexible

                                    (21,000 units)       (20,000 units)     (21,000 units)

Sales                       …$651,000                 $600,00             630,000 Fav

V. Cost of goods sold: ​ ​ 512,000              $ 460,000           483,000 Unfav

Direct materials .$231,000 ​                     $200,000             210,000

Direct labor   168,000 ​                              160,000               168,000

Variable overhead  73,500 ​                       60,000               63,000

Variable Operating Expenses 39,500       40,000             42,000

Contribution Margin    $139,000                140,000          147,000  Unfav

Fixed Expenses

Fixed Operating Expenses 12,000 ​ 12000           12000

Fixed overhead 77,500           80,000                  84,000

Income from operations  ​ $ 49,500    $ 48,000            $51,000  Fav

Working

Flexible Calculations = (600,000/20,000)*21,000= $ 630,000

V. Cost of goods sold= ($ 460,000 /20,000)*21,000= 483,000

Direct materials .   =  $200,000 /20,000)*21,000=   210,000

Direct labor =    160,000/20,000)*21,000=    168,000

Variable overhead  =  60,000 /20,000)*21,000=    63,000

Variable Operating Expenses =  40,000 /20,000)*21,000= 42,000

All calculations are carried out in the same way. Dividing the amount in the given budget with the number of units and multiplying it with actual number of units.

Flexible Contribution Margin 147,000 and Actual Contribution Margin 139,000 which shows a Variance  of 8000  which is unfavorable.

Answer:

Matt will earn $1,340.63  after-tax for the first year of his investment.

Explanation:

The interest to be received = amount of deposit * annual interest rate * (1 – tax rate)

= $31,250 * 5.5% * (1-22%)

= $1,340.63

Matt will earn $1,718.75 as gross interest in the first year, and after applying his 22% marginal tax rate, he will pay $378.13 in taxes on that interest. The after-tax interest that Matt will earn for the first year of his investment is therefore $1,340.62.

To calculate how much interest Matt will earn after-tax for the first year of his investment, we will follow these steps:

Step 1: Calculate Gross Interest

The gross interest earned in the first year is calculated by multiplying the principal amount by the interest rate:

Gross interest = Principal amount × Interest rate

Gross interest = $31,250 × 5.5% = $1,718.75

Step 2: Determine Amount of Tax

The amount of tax on the interest is found by multiplying the gross interest by Matt's marginal tax rate:

Tax on interest = Gross interest × Marginal tax rate

Tax on interest = $1,718.75 × 22.00% = $378.13

Step 3: Calculate Net Interest After Tax

Finally, we subtract the tax from the gross interest to get the after-tax interest Matt earns:

Net interest after tax = Gross interest - Tax on interest

Net interest after tax = $1,718.75 - $378.13 = $1,340.62

Answer:

Exponential Smoothing.

Explanation:

This is said to be so because, in exponential smoothing, the recent past is often the best indicator for future performance.

According to research and analytical studies, the reality of exponential smoothing is far less dramatic and far less traumatic. The truth is, exponential smoothing is a very simple calculation that accomplishes a rather simple task. It just has a complicated name because what technically happens as a result of this simple calculation is actually a little complicated.

It is also noted that understand it helps to start with the general concept of “smoothing” and a couple of other common methods used to achieve smoothing.

The most accurate forecasting technique varies by context; options include simple moving average, weighted moving average, exponential smoothing, and linear regression analysis. Analytical techniques like regression often offer greater precision over graphical methods, especially when using tools for calculation like Excel.

Choosing the most accurate forecasting technique depends on the context and the specific dataset. Among simple moving average, weighted moving average, exponential smoothing, and linear regression analysis, no single method is universally 'most accurate.' For example, a simple moving average is easy to understand and works well for datasets without trends or seasonality. A weighted moving average assigns more weight to recent data, making it more responsive to recent changes. Exponential smoothing is similar but uses a smoothing constant to control the weight of past observations. Finally, linear regression analysis fits a line through the data, considering the relationship between two variables and is excellent for data with a linear trend.

Using an analytical technique such as regression analysis can often provide a more accurate forecast than graphical methods because it uses mathematical equations to minimize the error in prediction. This technique would be especially useful for an economist predicting stock market outcomes, as it would consider the linear relationship between past and predicted data points and can be ecologically realistic.

Furthermore, using tools like Excel to graph least-squares regression lines offers a combination of visual analysis and the precision of mathematical calculation to improve forecast accuracy.

Answer:

The answer is $103,080.32

Explanation:

To calculate this , the formula for a sinking fund, compounded periodically is applied and the formula is stated as follows:

[tex]FV=PMT\frac{(1+\frac{r}{n} )^{n*t}}{\frac{r}{n}}-1[/tex]

where:

FV = future value

PMT = periodic payment = $500

r = interest rate = 2.02% = 0.0202

n = number of compounding periods per year = quarterly = 4

t = period of investment in years = 2 years

[tex]FV=500\frac{(1+\frac{0.0202}{4} )^{4*2}}{\frac{0.0202}{4}}-1[/tex]

[tex]=500\frac{(1.00505)^8}{0.00505} -1\\= 500(206.162639)-1[/tex]

= $103,080.32

Answer:

See attached file

Explanation:

Answer:

A. $3105

B. $3,500

C. $3,200

Explanation:

A casualty loss  is damage, destruction, or loss of property due to an event that is sudden, unexpected, or unusual such as fires, floods, accidents etc.

A. Amy can claim a casualty deduction since the machine was damaged in a traffic accident.  Therefore : $3500 - $395 = $3105. Amy can deduct $3105 for the loss of the equipment.

B. Amy can claim a casualty loss deduction for the lesser of the economic loss (the cost of repair) or the tax basis of the machine. Therefore, Amy can deduct $3,500.

C. Amy can claim a casualty loss deduction for the lesser of the economic loss (the cost of repair) or the tax basis of the machine. Therefore, Amy can deduct $3,200.

A. Amy can deduct $3,105 for the loss of the equipment. B. Amy cannot deduct any amount for the loss of the equipment since she repaired it. C. Amy can deduct $295 for the loss of the equipment.

A. When Amy decides to sell the damaged equipment to a junk shop, she realizes a loss on the equipment. The amount of the loss is calculated by subtracting the amount received from the sale of the damaged equipment from the cost of the equipment. Amy purchased the equipment for $3,500 and sold it for $395 after it was damaged. Therefore, the loss Amy can deduct is calculated as follows:

Loss = Cost of Equipment - Proceeds from Sale

Loss = $3,500 - $395

Loss = $3,105

So, Amy can deduct $3,105 for the loss of the equipment.

B. If Amy chooses to repair the equipment, the cost of repairs does not result in a loss that can be deducted. Instead, the cost of repairs would generally be added to the basis of the equipment and depreciated over its useful life. Since Amy did not place the equipment into service during the year, she cannot claim any depreciation or cost recovery expense for the equipment, and thus, she cannot deduct any amount for the loss of the equipment.

C. When Amy has the equipment repaired for an amount less than the original cost, she can deduct the difference between the cost of the equipment and the cost of repairs as a loss. Amy purchased the equipment for $3,500 and repaired it for $3,200. The loss Amy can deduct is calculated as follows:

Loss = Cost of Equipment - Cost of Repairs

Loss = $3,500 - $3,200

Loss = $300

However, Amy also received $395 from selling the damaged equipment before repairing it. This amount needs to be subtracted from the loss to determine the deductible loss:

Deductible Loss = Loss - Proceeds from Sale

Deductible Loss = $300 - $395

Deductible Loss = -$295 (which is a negative number, indicating a deductible loss)

Therefore, Amy can deduct $295 for the loss of the equipment. Note that the negative sign indicates a deductible loss, not a negative loss, so the amount to be deducted is $295.

To find the resulting values of Q and R when a Type 2 service objective of 95 percent is substituted for the stock-out cost of $12.80, we need to use the formula provided for the reorder point (R). However, without the values for lead time (LT) and safety stock (SS), the exact values of Q and R cannot be determined. Similarly, the imputed cost of shortage cannot be calculated without the necessary information.

To find the resulting values of Q and R when a Type 2 service objective of 95 percent is substituted for the stock-out cost of $12.80, we need to use the formula provided for the reorder point (R):

R = Q * LT + SS

Since the question does not provide values for LT (lead time) and SS (safety stock), we cannot determine the exact values of Q and R. Similarly, the imputed cost of shortage cannot be calculated without the necessary information.

https://brainly.com/question/33886505

#SPJ3

Answer: $200

Explanation:

To qualify as a Casualty loss, the event that led to the damage or destruction must have been unexpected such as an accident, hurricane, fire etc.

When calculating for the Casualty loss deduction, we simply deduct the money received from the insurance from the Adjusted basis,

Casualty loss deduction = Adjusted basis - Cash received from the Insurance company

= $14,000 - $10,000

= $4,000

Since it is After any limitations, we also deduct a cost per event floor of $100 and 10% of the AGI

=4,000 - 100 - (37,000*0.1)

= $200

Belinda's casualty loss deduction (after any limitations) is $200.

Answer:

$16,000

Explanation:

Given:

Amount receives from disability policy = $16,000

John's employer paid = 100%

Amount include in income = ?

Computation of amount include in income:

Amount include in income = Amount receives from disability policy × John's employer paid

Amount include in income = $16,000 × 100%

Amount include in income = $16,000

Note: Payments receives from the health insurance Policies are not included.

Answer:

The correct answer is: e-commerce enabler.

Explanation:

An e-commerce enabler is an online-based business that allows other individuals and businesses to offer their products as part of the enabler's webpage. The e-commerce enabler acts as a mall where different stores offer their goods without the need of having a correlation. One of the most famous e-commerce enabler worldwide is Alibaba.

Answer:

use the implicit rate of the lessor, assuming that the implicit rate is known to the lessee.

Explanation:

Present value is the technique used in determining the today's worth of future value using a discounting factor.

In calculating the discounting factor to be used for computing the present value of lease payments, the lessee has the option of using whichever is lower between its incremental borrowing rate or the implicit rate of the lessor. The implicit rate of the lessor will be considered only if the lessee knows the the implicit rate of the lessor.

Based on this, the correct option from the question is to use the implicit rate of the lessor, assuming that the implicit rate is known to the lessee. This is if it is lower than its incremental borrowing rate.

Answer:

itll be 10

Explanation:

because on how itll show for the energy on demand

When a monopolist faces inelastic demand and increases the price, total revenue increases, and profits could potentially rise, assuming costs remain constant. A monopolist chooses to produce a quantity at which demand is inelastic because this maximizes total revenue. The point of maximized total revenue corresponds to where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.

With respect to inelastic demand, when a monopolist raises its prices, total revenue would increase because the percentage change in quantity demanded is less than the percentage change in price. In contrast, total cost would not necessarily change unless the monopolist's supply or production costs also change. This scenario could cause profits to increase, assuming that costs remain constant.

Now, a monopolist will produce a quantity at which demand is inelastic to increase total revenue. This portion of the demand curve is often at lower quantities where consumers are less responsive to price changes. The marginal-revenue (MR) curve plays a significant role here, with the monopolist maximizing revenue where MR=0. Remember, inelastic demand occurs when the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand is less than 1.

 So, using the purple segment (diamond symbols) for indicating the inelastic part of the demand curve, there will often be on the steeper upper portion of the curve. The black point (plus symbol) that shows the quantity and price maximizing total revenue (TR) will be where marginal revenue (MR) equals marginal cost (MC) - this is also the profit-maximizing point for the monopolist.

https://brainly.com/question/31802801

#SPJ2

Answer:

Selling style

Explanation:

Hersey and Blanchard’s model states that leaders have to adapt their styles to the followers and their skills and it established 4 leadership styles:

-Telling style: It is used when the follower is unable to perform the tasks and unwilling to do it so the leader needs to provide directions and explain the consequences of not doing the tasks.

-Selling style: It is used when the follower is willing but unable to perform the tasks and the leader has to be supportive to help the followers to be confident.

-Delegating style: It is used when the follower is willing and able to perform the tasks and the leader provides autonomy but gives support if it is required.

-Participating style: Follower is able but unwilling to perform the tasks and the leader allows the follower to perform the job and focuses on motivating the person.

According to this, the leadership style that Brianna should use according to Hersey and Blanchard’s model is the selling style because Devon is willing but unable to perform the job  at the level Brianna would like.

Final answer:

For an employee like Devon with high commitment but low competence, Brianna should use a coaching leadership style according to Hersey and Blanchard's SLT to provide high directive and supportive behaviour to enhance his performance.

Explanation:

According to Hersey and Blanchard's Situational Leadership Theory (SLT), a leader must adapt their style to fit the development level of the follower they are trying to influence. In the case of Brianna and her employee, Devon, who has a willingness to work hard (high commitment) but lacks certain skills (low competence), Brianna should utilize a coaching leadership style. This style involves a high level of directive behaviour to compensate for the employee's lack of competence, as well as a high level of supportive behaviour due to the employee's commitment. By using a coaching approach, Brianna will provide the guidance Devon requires to perform his tasks effectively while also fostering his skills development, which would involve more interaction and input solicitation compared to a strictly directive approach.

Answer:

The target cost per iron= $83.25

Explanation:

Profit Required = Required Investment * required rate of return

= $ 3,500,000*15%

= $ 525,000

Sales= 300000*85=$25,500,000.00

Less: profit required=$525,000.00

Cost= Sales- Profit

Cost=24,975,000.00

Per Unit Target Cost = Total Cost / Total Units

= $ 24,975,000/ 300,000

= $ 83.25

The target cost per iron is $83.25.

The target cost per iron is calculated by subtracting the desired profit from the sales price and then dividing by the number of units sold. The desired profit is determined by the required investment and the minimum required rate of return.

 First, we calculate the desired profit by multiplying the required investment by the minimum required rate of return:

[tex]\[ \text{Desired Profit} = \text{Required Investment} \times \text{Minimum Required Rate of Return} \] \[ \text{Desired Profit} = \$3,500,000 \times 0.15 \] \[ \text{Desired Profit} = \$525,000 \][/tex]

Next, we calculate the total revenue by multiplying the unit sales price by the number of units expected to be sold:

[tex]\[ \text{Total Revenue} = \text{Unit Sales Price} \times \text{Unit Sales} \] \[ \text{Total Revenue} = \$85 \times 300,000 \] \[ \text{Total Revenue} = \$25,500,000 \][/tex]

The total cost should be the total revenue minus the desired profit:

[tex]\[ \text{Total Cost} = \text{Total Revenue} - \text{Desired Profit} \] \[ \text{Total Cost} = \$25,500,000 - \$525,000 \] \[ \text{Total Cost} = \$24,975,000 \][/tex]

Finally, we calculate the target cost per iron by dividing the total cost by the number of units sold:

[tex]\[ \text{Target Cost per Iron} = \frac{\text{Total Cost}}{\text{Unit Sales}} \] \[ \text{Target Cost per Iron} = \frac{\$24,975,000}{300,000} \] \[ \text{Target Cost per Iron} = \$83.25 \][/tex]

Answer:

$153,333

Explanation:

The computation of the compensation expense for the year 1 is shown below:

= (Number of Stock options granted × fair value of the options) ÷ (number of years)

= (92,000 stock options × $5) ÷ 3 years

= $460,000 ÷ 3 years

= $153,333

By applying the above formula we can get the compensation expense for the year 1

Answer: $223,000 long-term capital gain.

Explanation:

LEGALLY MARRIED couples who file a JOINT TAX RETURN, selling their Place of PRIMARY RESIDENCE are allowed to reduce by $500,000, their Long-term capital gain.

That means that Mr. and Mrs. Frazier, bless their souls, are allowed to remove $500,000 from the total $723,000 and as such recognize only $223,000 as tax consequence on long-term capital gain.

I guess Uncle Sam likes marriages.

If you need any clarification do react or comment.

Answer:

(a) Journals to record the purchase of inventory:

Debit Inventory                            $95,000

Credit Note payable                    $95,000

(To record the purchase of inventory)

(b) Accrual of interest on the note payable on November 31, 2019:

Debit Interest expense                 $47,025

Credit Interest payable                 $47,025

(Total interest accrual on notes)

Explanation:

Note receivable is a promissory note with a written promise made by the borrower to the lender (payee) to pay a certain, definite sum at a specified date.

The interest expense on the notes is calculated as: Principal x Interest Rate x Time

In this case, the total interest expense is $95,000 x 66%/12 x 9 months = $47,025.

Monthly interest expense is $47,025 / 9 months = $5,225.

For accrual purpose, Jasper Company would be recording the following journals on a monthly basis before the actual cash payment:

Debit Interest expense                 $5,225

Credit Interest payable                 $5,225

(Monthly recognition of interest expense on notes)

Final answer:

The student's question involves journalizing a purchase of inventory on credit and the subsequent accrual of interest on the note payable. The inventory purchase is recorded as a debit to Inventory and a credit to Notes Payable, while interest is accrued as a debit to Interest Expense and a credit to Interest Payable, calculated based on the principal, the interest rate, and the period.

Explanation:

The question posed involves recording accounting transactions based on the accrual accounting principle. Jasper Company's purchase of inventory and the associated note payable highlight the need for businesses to journalize transactions when they occur and account for interest accrual, in adherence to the matching principle in accounting.

Journal Entry for Purchase of Inventory

(a) May 1, 2019
Inventory $95,000
Notes Payable $95,000

This entry records the purchase of inventory by debiting inventory and crediting notes payable.

Journal Entry for Accrual of Interest

(b) November 31, 2019 (Assuming this is a typo and should be November 30, 2019)
Interest Expense (to be calculated)
Interest Payable (to be calculated)

To calculate the interest expense, the following formula is used: Principal ($95,000) × Annual Interest Rate (6%) × Time in Terms of Year (7/12 months since the purchase until November 30). The result would be the interest expense for the seven months, which would be debited to Interest Expense and credited to Interest Payable.

Answer:

See attached

Explanation:

I have prepared a Statement of Activities for the not-for-profit organization for the year ended December 31, 2017. Please see attached file for the statement.

The Statement of Activities for the not for profit organization for the year ended December 31, 2017 is prepared in good form. It has been found from the Statement of Activities that the total change in net assets from restricted and unrestricted activities are $9,577 and $2,813 respectively.

A nonprofit organisation is one that meets the IRS's criteria for tax-exempt status because its mission and purpose are to advance a social cause and provide a public benefit. Hospitals, universities, national charities, and foundations are examples of nonprofit organizations.

A statement of activities quantifies a non-profit entity's revenue and expenses for a given reporting period. This is the non-profit version of the income statement, which is used to report a for-profit company's financial results.

Therefore, Statement of Activities for the not for profit organization for the year ended December 31, 2017 is attached below.

To learn more about not-for-profit organization, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29848054

#SPJ5

Answer:

The beginning balance in accounts receivable was: $47,500

Explanation:

Sales reported on the income statement were $385,500, Accounts receivable increased of $385,500 during the period.

Sales, adjusted to a cash basis using the direct method on the statement of cash flows, were $359,000. The company collected $359,000 from the sales. Accounts receivable decreased of $359,000 during the period.

The beginning balance in accounts receivable = The ending balance of accounts receivable + Accounts receivable decreased during the period - Accounts receivable increased during the period = $74,000 + $359,000 - $385,500 = $47,500

Final answer:

To find the beginning balance of accounts receivable, we used the accounting equation: Beginning Accounts Receivable + Sales on Credit - Cash Collected = Ending Accounts Receivable. With the given data, the calculation indicated that the beginning balance was $47,500.

Explanation:

The question requires us to calculate the beginning balance of accounts receivable using the given ending balance of accounts receivable, cash basis sales, and the income statement sales. To do so, we can use the following formula derived from accrual accounting principles:

Beginning Accounts Receivable + Sales on Credit - Cash Collected from Customers = Ending Accounts Receivable

In this particular case, we know the following:

Turning this information into an equation, we get:

Beginning Accounts Receivable + $385,500 - $359,000 = $74,000

Solving this equation for the beginning balance :

Beginning Accounts Receivable = $74,000 + $359,000 - $385,500

Beginning Accounts Receivable = $47,500

Thus, the beginning balance in accounts receivable was $47,500.

Answer:

The correct answer is $230,000 gain.

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:

Fair value = $880,000

Basis = $650,000

So, we can calculate the gain or loss  on the distribution by using following formula:

Gain or Loss = Fair value - Basis

By putting the value, we get

Gain or Loss = $880,000 - $650,000

= $230,000 ( Positive shows gain)

So, Gain = $230,000.

Answer:

The project will pya itself at the seventh year.

The last year cash inflwo will not impact the payback period as the project already achieve payback before that year.

Explanation:

The payback is the moment at which the project net clashflow is zero

that is the inflow matches the initial outflow:

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}Year&Inflow&Outflow&Net&Acc\\1&1,000&15,000&-14,000&-14,000\\2&2,000&8,000&-6,000&-20,000\\3&2,500&&2,500&-17,500\\4&4,000&&4,000&-13,500\\5&5,000&&5,000&-8,500\\6&6,000&&6,000&-2,500\\7&5,000&&5,000&2,500\\8&4,000&&4,000&6,500\\9&3,000&&3,000&9,500\\10&2,000&&2,000&11,500\\\end{array}\right][/tex]

The payback period is termed as the period the company takes to reach the break-even point. The funds that are raised for the expansion of the company have to recoup with time and the period is known as the payback period.

The determination of the payback period of investment has been attached below.

The last year's payback does not affect the present payback as the accounting periods are different.

To know more about the  determination of the payback period of investment, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/23287507

Answer:

100

Explanation:

Goal programming is an optimization technique that allows for multiple, normally conflicting objectives and then attempts to solve each goal sequentially to a satisfactory level. In goal programming, differential variables are being used.

Since the goal programming problem had two goals. Goal number 1 was to achieve a profit of $2,400 and goal number 2 was to have no idle time for workers in the factory. The optimal solution to this problem resulted in a profit of $2,300 and no idle time

This means that goal number 2 was achieved since the optimal solution resulted in no idle time. But goal number 1 was not achieved because a profit of $2300 was achieved in the solution instead of $2400.

Therefore, the value for the objective function for this goal programming problem = 2400 - 2300 = 100

Answer: b) By redirecting the URLs, those URLs will no longer rank independently on search engines, moving other (potentially negative) sites up higher in the rankings

Explanation:

The Non-profit Organization is shooting itself in the foot by purchasing the more positive sites and then setting them up in such a way that they will be redirected to their home page.

This is because when sites merely redirect, they lose their independence ranking. As this happens their place will be taken on search engines.

Seeing as the Nonprofit did this more with positive sites, there is a high chance that the sites that will replace those positive sites will be negative sites meaning that when people search for the Organization, they might see more negative information.

The downside of buying up positive websites and redirecting them to the organization's own URL is a potential reputation damage and missed opportunity for diverse perspectives.

The downside of the nonprofit organization buying up positive websites and redirecting them to their own URL is that it may be perceived as manipulative and deceptive. This could damage the organization's reputation and undermine the trust of its supporters. Additionally, by redirecting URLs, the organization may miss out on the opportunity to engage with the diverse perspectives and feedback of their supporters.

https://brainly.com/question/5584094

#SPJ12

Answer: Act of State Doctrine

Explanation: The Act of State Doctrine is a principle of International law that prevents courts from questioning the validity of a foreign country's sovereign acts that take place within its own territory and that courts should not decide cases that would interfere with their country's foreign policy. It then follows that every sovereign state is bound to respect the independence of other sovereign states. Nation B therefore cannot meddle with Nation A’s decision under the Act of State Doctrine.

Answer:

Estimated warranty liability $8,700

       To Party inventory $8,700

(Being the customer warranty repair is recorded)

Explanation:

The journal entry to record the customer warranty repairs is shown below:

Estimated warranty liability $8,700

       To Party inventory $8,700

(Being the customer warranty repair is recorded)

While recording this we debited the estimated  warranty liability as it decreased the liability and also at the same time it decreased the assets due to which the party inventory is credited

Answer:

a. Estimate purchases (in units) for June and July.

b. Estimate the cash required to make purchases in June and July.

Explanation:

During June, Lakeside needs to purchase (expected sales - beginning inventory) + expected sales for net month =  (13,800 - 12,000) + 9,600 = 11,400 parts

During July, Lakeside needs to purchase expected sales for net month = 12,400 parts

During June, Lakeside will need to pay (previous month's purchase x 30%) + (current month's purchase x 70%) = (17,000 parts x $20 x 30%) + (11,400 x $20 x 70%) = $102,000 + $159,600 = $261,600

During June, Lakeside will need to pay (previous month's purchase x 30%) + (current month's purchase x 70%) = (11,400 parts x $20 x 30%) + (12,400 x $20 x 70%) = $68,400 + $173,600 = $242,000