Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible [cannot be defeated] right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it. —John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776 Which Enlightenment ideas are expressed by John Adams in the quotation above? A. Government retains power only through the will and force of the armed forces. B. Government is responsible for maintaining order and peace through laws over the people. C. Government may declare independence from the people, and the people may not rebel. D. Government is legitimate with the consent of the people, and the people have the right to rebel. Reset Next Question

Answer:

The Battle of Vincennes

Explanation:

The Battle of Vincennes took place in Vincennes Indiana in 1779. The British Army occupied the fort of Vincennes and were surrounded by the patriot army, there were three days of fighting and at the end, the British army surrendered the fort to the patriots.

B.) - invoking cloture

When a process is deliberately being delayed or prevented to be brought to a vote in the Senate, Standing Rules of the United States Senate allows a senator, or several, to invoke cloture, which it's their only defense to bring the debate to a quick end.

The term "cloture" comes from French and it means "the act of terminating something".

In the first presidential ellection of 1788-89 voter turnout was very low, 1.8-6% of the population. This is believed to have been due the restrictions on the right to vote, wich was held primarily by white landowners, immigrants were discouraged to vote and women, slaves, indentured servants, non citizens and men youger than 21 were considered too ignorant to vote.

Furthermore, each state could impose restrictions on the right to vote, and in these early days many states imposed them on other faiths, for example only congregationalists had the right in Massachussets while Quakers, Jews and Catholics couldn't vote in Virginia and Rhode Island.

Mao Zedong launched the Cultural Revolution because he believed that ideological considerations were more important than economic progress. Thus, option (A) is correct.

To further explain his motivations behind the Cultural Revolution:

Overall, Mao prioritized ideological purity over economic stability and progress during the Cultural Revolution, leading to significant human and economic costs.

Complete Question:

Mao Zedong launched the Cultural Revolution because he believed

A. ideological considerations were more important than economic progress.

B. that educated specialists were to be given a free hand to rebuild the lagging Chinese economy.

C. given the crises facing China, "experts" would have precedence over "reds."

D. it was necessary to invade Taiwan and regain it from Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists.

E. it was time to invite Richard Nixon to China.

The formation of the Confederate States of America was primarily caused by the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, due to his opposition to slavery's expansion.

The formation of the Confederate States of America was primarily caused by the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States in 1860. Lincoln's opposition to the expansion of slavery into new territories threatened the economic foundation of the southern states, which led them to secede from the Union. The secession of seven southern states led to the formation of the Confederate States of America before Lincoln could even be inaugurated. Thus, the correct answer to your question is 'd. The election of Abraham Lincoln'

https://brainly.com/question/2292299

#SPJ3

Answer:

Explanation:

The agreement between thirteen states of USA and served as its first constitution is called Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, its purpose was to maintain the sovereignty and independence of the states. But in the structure of government created by the Articles gave only limited power to the central government (Continental Congress), only those powers which that colonies recognised as belonging to the king and the parliament.

Hence the central government could not enforce laws and if a state didn't support the law they could simply ignore it. It also didn't have power to regulate trade or collect taxes. Hence to get rid of all these weaknesses and revise the Articles  Constitutional Convention met at the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787 and finished the completed the new constitution on September 17, 1787.

Answer:

senate members represent state interest while house represents district interest

Explanation:

Senate members represent state interests while house members represent district interests describe the difference in the duties of a Senate member and house members.

A Senate member refer to someone is is part of the Senate that Is the upper legislative arms of the country legislature. A Senate member represent state constituency.

An House member is a person that is part of the lower legislative arm of a country or state house of assembly. House member represent the interest of the district.

Therefore, Senate members represent state interests while house members represent district interests describe the difference in the duties of a Senate member and house members.

Learn more about Senate from the link below.

https://brainly.com/question/934873

The main reason for the opposition of the South to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was his stance on slavery, which threatened the economic and social structure of the Southern states. The South also feared increased interference from the federal government and a loss of states' rights. There was a cultural and ideological divide between the North and the South, with the South valuing agrarianism, states' rights, and a traditional social order.

The main reason for the opposition of the South to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was his stance on slavery. Lincoln's election threatened the institution of slavery in the South, as he was determined to prevent its expansion into the new territories. This was seen as a threat to the economic and social structure of the Southern states, which heavily relied on slavery.

Additionally, the South believed that Lincoln's election would lead to increased interference from the federal government and a loss of states' rights. The Southern states feared that a Republican president would limit their ability to govern themselves and uphold their interests.

Finally, there was also a cultural and ideological divide between the North and the South, with the South valuing agrarianism, states' rights, and a traditional social order. Lincoln's election represented a shift towards industrialization, a stronger federal government, and social changes that were not accepted by the South.

https://brainly.com/question/984148

#SPJ2

The major reason for the Southern opposition to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was his stance on slavery. He opposed its expansion into new territories, which the South saw as a direct threat to their economy based largely on slavery.

The main reason for the opposition of the South to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was his stance on slavery. Lincoln, a member of the new Republican Party, was against the expansion of slavery into new territories. The South, heavily reliant on slavery for its agricultural economy, saw this as a direct threat to their way of life and economic stability. This fundamental ideological difference and perceived threat gave rise to significant opposition in the South.

https://brainly.com/question/31855965

#SPJ2

Final answer:

The conflict in Kashmir stems from both India and Pakistan claiming the region since India's independence in 1947, resulting in several wars and prolonged unrest. The crux of the issue is territorial sovereignty over a region with strategic importance, particularly water resources.

Explanation:

After India gained independence from British colonial rule in 1947 and Pakistan was formed, Kashmir became a center of conflict mainly because both India and Pakistan claim sovereignty over the region. The partition left the future of Jammu and Kashmir unresolved, with its Maharaja initially opting for independence before seeking support from India amidst Muslim uprisings, which led to subsequent wars and conflicts. Despite a few ceasefire attempts and ongoing international border disputes, tensions remain, particularly since Kashmir has strategic importance, including control over water resources from the Indus River.

The correct answer to the problem posed is option B: India and Pakistan both believe they should control the region. Various wars have erupted as both nations have tried to assert control over the entirety of Kashmir, with a power struggle that is still evident to this day, further complicated by both countries possessing nuclear capabilities.

The uncertainty in Kashmir continues as the future of this deeply contested territory remains a subject of ongoing concern and potential conflict between India, Pakistan, and also involves China to some extent over different parts of the region.

Answer:

correct answer d

Explanation:

edgun

Whenever a financial institution analyzes an individual creditworthiness. It takes into account 3 categories:

Answer: Answer:B) central to citizenship.

Explanation:

“Of course, voting is useful. But then again, I don't put a big glow to it. Voting is about as essential as washing yourself. It's something you're supposed to do." According to Chuck D., the act of voting is central to citizenship. Thus, option (b) is correct.

What is voting?

The term voting refer to the participation of the country citizen in the system of the creation of the democratic government. The voting right only to the permanent citizen of the country. The voting are the vote the candidate are to win the election. The voting are the public choice to vote the candidate.

The citizen is responsible for voting. They will not be forced to vote for the candidate. The right to vote is an essential component of any democracy. Citizens participate in the democratic process by casting ballots. Citizens elect officials to promote them and their ideas, and the leaders advocate for the citizens' best interests.

Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on voting, here:

https://brainly.com/question/21093353

#SPJ2

Only 600 of the 3,400 marines were left standing after the battle of Iwo Jima, which took place from February 19 to March 26 of 1945. The whole battle was very deadly for both sides, but the American troops suffered more casualities than Japan.

It would be A Charles brown

American public opinion about the war has been influenced by media coverage, the portrayal of the military in newspapers and films, moral decision-making against totalitarian regimes, respect for troops, and political and economic consequences of the war. These factors have shaped public sentiment and voting behavior in various historical contexts.

Factors Influencing American Public Opinion about War

Several factors have historically influenced American public opinion regarding wars. Media coverage, which often reflects the views of U.S. policymakers and the military, plays a significant role in shaping public opinion. For instance, before the U.S. entered various wars, the lack of censorship allowed the public access to the harsh realities of war, often culminating in a lack of desire to participate. Moreover, the portrayal of wars in newspapers and Hollywood often glorified the military and promoted pro-war sentiment, especially after events such as Pearl Harbor, which fueled patriotic and retaliatory feelings.

The concept of a moral decision in the face of aggressive totalitarian regimes also swayed public opinion in favor of participating in worldwide conflicts. Likewise, respect for troops and soldiers, even amongst those who opposed the wars, showed a marked difference in public opinion compared to previous times. In addition, wars such as the one in Iraq highlighted political and economic concerns, motivating voters to support politicians who promised to end the war, demonstrating how national issues can influence voting behavior and public opinion.

Answer:

The Know-Nothing Party was founded in 1849 by nativist Americans.

Explanation:

The Know Nothing movement was a predominantly Nativist American political movement of the 1840s and 1850s. It emerged inspired by the fear of Irish-Catholic immigrants, whose number was growing in the main cities of United States, considering them as hostile to American values, thinking that they were controlled by the Pope. It was a movement of short duration, active mainly between 1854-56. It demanded legal reforms but few were accepted. Among its members were few relevant political figures, and its members were mostly middle class and Protestant. Apparently it was absorbed by the Northern Republican Party.

The nativist Americans founded the Know-Nothing Party in 1849. Therefore, option D is correct.

The Know-Nothing Party, officially known as the American Party, was a political party in the United States that emerged in the 1850s. It was characterized by its anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic stance, advocating for nativism and strict immigration controls.

The party's name "Know-Nothing" derived from its secretive nature, as members were instructed to reply "I know nothing" when asked about party activities.

The Know-Nothing Party gained popularity for a brief period, winning seats in Congress and state legislatures, but eventually declined due to internal divisions and the shifting political landscape.

Therefore, option D is correct.

Learn more about Know-Nothing Party here:

https://brainly.com/question/26817969

#SPJ6

Most probably, your complete question is this:

Who founded the Know-Nothing Party in 1849:

A. Irish immigrants.

B. Factory owners.

C. Female mill workers.

D. Nativist Americans.

Natural rights are freedoms that all residents possess, despite, faith, ethnicity, gender, etc. These natural rights are deemed to be preserved by the government. In order to preserve these liberties, residents have to give up some of their personal rights. This opinion of the government defending natural rights in a transaction for a fewer personal right is recognized as a social contract.

We believe these facts to be self-evident, that all people are created even, that they are given by their Creator with individual unalienable freedoms, that with these are life, freedom, and the pursuance of satisfaction. These great words arrive from the Declaration of Independence, one of the most prominent establishing papers.

The Panama Canal Treaty signed by President Carter determined that the U.S. would return the Panama Canal Zone and the canal itself to Panama by the end of 1999, recognizing Panama's sovereignty and aiming to improve diplomatic relations, despite domestic opposition.

According to the Panama Canal Treaty signed by President Jimmy Carter, the United States agreed to return both the Panama Canal Zone and the Panama Canal itself to the government of Panama by the end of 1999. This decision followed recognition that the Canal Zone was sovereign Panamanian territory according to international law, and there was no proper authorization from the Panamanian people for the U.S. to hold the Canal Zone at its inception. While providing security for the canal had been cited as a reason for U.S. presence, the decision to hand over control was influenced by broader considerations of sovereignty and regional relations.

President Carter's decision was part of a larger strategy to improve U.S. relations in Latin America, but faced significant opposition at home. Conservative groups and politicians, including Ronald Reagan, accused Carter of 'abandoning' the canal and compromising U.S. military interests. The Panama Canal's return was a landmark decision in the context of Cold War-era politics and U.S. foreign policy, ultimately reflecting a shift away from colonial-era control of strategic waterways.