How did the indian politicies of the united states government affect the relationship between settlers in the west and native americans

Final answer:

The fall of the western Roman Empire resulted in the fragmentation of Western Europe into Germanic kingdoms, blending Roman and Germanic cultures to lay the groundwork for medieval Europe. Political unity was lost, and the social, political, and religious landscapes were fundamentally altered.

Explanation:

The fall of the western Roman Empire led to the fragmentation of political power in Western Europe and the emergence of numerous Germanic kingdoms. This transformation marked an end to Roman political unity, with Rome itself losing sovereignty in the face of invasions by Germanic 'barbarians.' While the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire continued for another thousand years, the Western territories underwent significant changes that laid the foundations for what would become medieval Europe. An important outcome of the West's collapse was that ambitious tribal chiefs carved out territories, often retaining some Roman cultural elements such as the Latin language and Christian faith, while blending with their own traditions. Over time, these territories united to form kingdoms with rulers who aspired to the Roman title and heritage. The merging of Roman and Germanic cultures and institutions ultimately set the stage for the development of medieval civilization. The fall is often attributed to a variety of factors, including a stretched and vulnerable frontier and Germanic migrations and invasions, which made the Western Empire more prone to societal disruption compared to its Eastern counterpart. The Western Empire's fall fundamentally altered the social, political, and religious landscape of Europe, leading to the rise of the Roman church's influence and the eventual creation of a new European order.

According to the cartoon, the fire of anarchy is spreading over Cuba.

The two groups creating/fanning the flames are the Cubans loyal to the Spanish rule and the Cuban independentists.

The duty of the hour for the United States is not only liberate Cuba from the Spanish rule but from a worse fate than that one.

This cartoon is most likely from the Spanish/United States war of 1898. During this war, the American army faced the Spanish army to help the Cubans obtain their independence. The cartoonist wanted the viewer to support the war as a fight for liberty, because the United States interference in this foreign affair was controversial.  

Based on the details in the cartoon, the following are true:

The painting is about the Cuban Revolution which saw Cubans loyal to Spain fighting those who wanted independence. The conflict led to American businesses suffering.

This led to the many campaigning for the U.S to intervene in Cuba and one way they used to convince people was that Cuba was in a state of anarchy and the U.S. needed to save it.

Find out more on the Cuban Revolution at https://brainly.com/question/16440373.

Actually this is really a weird situation. When Roman law was in it's developing stages, there was a lot of wrangling about what to do. The law evolved in 2 very important steps.

1. This is very important. About the 5th century BC, it was thought best to write the laws down. That way a magistrate would be bound by what the law said, as would every other magistrate. The starting point would be the same for everyone. That meant that if someone deviated from what was written, there was a written reference. Everyone had the same written reference. And appeals could be based on the written Roman Law. So codification of the law belongs to both Rome and Greece, but mostly Rome.

Rome did contribute one thing (but they got part of that from the Greeks). When they got around to codifying the law, the made it into a science of sorts. The Greeks didn't do that. But the idea of what the scientific method was, came from Greece.  

So far what you see is Rome "borrowing" an idea from Greece and adding to it.

2. Guess where they stole the model for the 12 tables from? (this is the Roman version of the law). That's right, another thing stolen from Greece. Not just Athens. There were many cities that received Romans seeking models of the law. This last comment is disputed a bit by modern historians. They do not believe that Rome would send her noble class all over conquered Greece to get information. The historians of the time, thought that was the way it happened. I'll go with the people who were actually there. Roman historians for me.

In Government, I think your first and most promising answer is democracy developed in Athens. Who could speak and under what circumstances, and when debate was ended are all complex issues. The Romans preferred a Republican model. Let the upper classes do the ruling, but if you were a member of the senate, you could speak openly and have any opinion and defend it until debate ended. I'm not sure how the end of a debate was decided. I have the impression that one of the strongest points the Romans had was their tolerance. You could believe anything you wanted as long as it did not interfere with government. Even Jesus recognized this as a virtue. Do you remember what he said about the Roman Coin when asked? He said ‶Give unto Rome what is Rome's, and give unto God what is His.″ That's really amazing when you think about it.

Greece had the same open door policy, I think, or at least Athens did. Athens tolerated all sorts of governments to flourish, religions as well . As far as I know (check this) she never went to war with either Sparta or Thebes and if she did, it wasn't over their form of government, which was quite different.  

Two

I have read all sorts of reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. Realize that you are talking about an institution that stayed in power for about 1000 years. Who has matched that?  

Everything is possible. Everything. One scholar believes it was lead in the pipes transporting the water was the cause. Another believes that the Goths (and their ‶cousins″ could not be defended against.  Another thought it was because the army was paid in debased currency. Still another thought it might be the debasement of their currency.  I like the possibility that the empire was split in 2 by Constatine which allowed the Eastern Empire to remain for many many years. Still others thought it was corruption that ended the integrety of the of the ruling classes. I don't know what you are going to pick.  

There are all sorts of reasons offered from psychological to physical to military, and it really does depend on what period you begin with and where you think it all ended.

https://brainly.com/question/11242487

A. and C. It is said that after Akhenaten and Ramses, the pharaohs became extremely weak (given the exception that Akenaten was considerably weak himself). Therefore, various enemies were able to easily attack Egypt until Rome finally conquered the country and it fell under their rule.

Answer:

A : Weak Pahraohs

C: War

Explanation:

Fall of the New Kingdom

It was during the reign of Ramesses III that the powerful Egyptian Empire began to weaken. Ramesses III had to fight many battles including an invasion by the Sea Peoples and tribesmen from Libya. These wars, combined with severe drought and famine, caused unrest throughout Egypt. In the years after Ramesses III died, internal corruption and infighting in the central government became worse. The last pharaoh of the New Kingdom was Ramesses XI. After his reign, Egypt was no longer united and the Third Intermediate Period began.

SOURCE :

Read more at: https://www.ducksters.com/history/ancient_egypt/new_kingdom.php

This text is Copyright © Ducksters. Do not use without permission.

Thank You

The correct answer is answer D, "The information comes from a reliable source, and the date of publication is recent."

No source is truly unbiased, but we can however find credibility in the serious character of an article that comes from an official entity such as a government agency. Now that we have our reliable source, a good way to insure the information will be accurate is to check for the publication date. The more recent it is, the more certainty we have of its current relevancy.

Hope this clears things up!

The phrase "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness," was an idea first considered by John Locke in his Two Treatises on Government. Thomas Jefferson then used the thoughts written by Locke while he wrote the Declaration of Independence.

Answer:

Colonies were new markets where merchants could sell their goods.

Colonies provided resources for making manufactured goods in industrialized countries.

Explanation:

Colonial exploitation was beneficial to the economy of the metropoles for two main reasons resulting from the Colonial Pact.

First, the colonial pact established that colonies could only buy products from their European metropole. Consequently, the colonies became new markets for the disposal of European products.

Second, the colonies became suppliers of natural resources that were exported to Europe to manufacture.

In the end, the process of import and export between European countries and colonies was beneficial to global GDP.

Answer:

b c d f

Explanation:

the correct answer is False

NOT a reason Jefferson decided to purchase the Louisiana Territory:  A. The purchase aligned with his strict constructionist views.

Explanation/context:

Jefferson was uncertain as to whether he had constitutional authority to accept the treaty.  Thomas Jefferson was a "strict constructionist."  In other words, he believed that we ought only do what is strictly outlined in the Constitution.  Loose constructionists, by contrast, believed that we are free to take an action if that action is not specifically prohibited by the Constitution.  Because of Jefferson's views on how to interpret and abide by the Constitution, it's no surprise that he had some hesitancy about proceeding with the Louisiana Purchase.  He thought the matter should be brought to the American people for them to approve a constitutional amendment.  However, others in government didn't view the matter the same way, and eventually the treaty was ratified.  

The treaty, as negotiated by James Monroe and Robert Livingston on behalf of the USA, was announced on July 4, 1803.  The Senate ratified the treaty in October, 1803, after disregarding President Jefferson's draft for an amendment to the Constitution.  

Ultimately, Jefferson was convinced by others in his administration.  In a statement he made at the time, Jefferson justified the purchase with this analogy:  "“It is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; and saying to him when of age, I did this for your good."

The reason that is NOT a reason why Jefferson decided to purchase the Louisiana Territory is option A: 'The purchase aligned with his strict constructionist views'. Jefferson made the purchase more from practical and diplomatic needs rather than strictly adhering to his strict constructionist philosophies.

The incorrect statement or the reason that is NOT a reason why Jefferson decided to purchase the Louisiana Territory is option A: 'The purchase aligned with his strict constructionist views'. Thomas Jefferson was indeed a strict constructionist, meaning he believed in a narrow interpretation of the Constitution's granting of powers to the federal government. However, the Louisiana Purchase was more related to his practical and diplomatic needs rather than his strict constructionist views. The other options all are valid reasons why Jefferson decided to purchase the territory. Namely, to prevent a foreign nation from gaining control (Option B), to secure control of the Port of New Orleans and the Mississippi River for commerce (Option C), and to double the size of the United States (Option D).

https://brainly.com/question/29760168

#SPJ3

In 1517, more specifically October 31th, there was a break within the Church. Martin Luther (a German Augustinian monk), started the Protestant Revolution, by nailing a 95 point manifest on the door of Wittenberg Cathedral, in response to Pope Leo X decision to sell indulgences.

The main difference between their art style is what they wanted to convey with it.

Protestants focus on the relationship that people have with God, on a daily basis. It is a humbler approach to religion, showing that God's creation is beautiful as well and must be respected. Catholic concepts such as Saints, the Immaculate Conception, the Transfiguration of Christ, depictions of the Pope, were left aside. Reason for this was that Protestants believed that salvation, is only a matter of God.

Examples of this doctrine are: The Milkmaid by Jan Vermeer (1657); Woman holding a balance by Johannes Vermeer (1665).

On the other hand, Catholics launched the Catholic Counter-Reformation Art, by the Council of Trent in 1563, to further differentiate Catholicism and Protestantism. The goal was to minimize the Protestant Revolution

Their style was based in the mysteries of the Faith, which included the Virgin Mary, Saints, Transubstantiation, Cruxification, etc.  Intense spiritualism and a clear message that ordinary people could understand was also a characteristic of Catholic Baroque.

One of its greatest exponents was Caravaggio (painter). Examples of his paintings are: The Entombment of Christ (1601-3); St. Matthew and the Angel (1602)

Both, the Kazakhs and Kyrgyz are people from the Turkic group of people. The Turkic people differ in appearance from region to region, and we have some that resemble more of East Asians, some of Iranians, and some of Caucasians. The Kazakhs and Kyrgys have a very similar appearance wuth the East Asians, and this is due to the bigger genetic influence from the Mongols during the Middle Ages. The Turkic people originally had partially East Asian appearance, and the Mongol influence just made it more apparent in this two ethnic groups.

The correct answer is C.

Proprietary colonies were one of the types of British colonies established in North America. The owner of the land was the British King but, in order to focus on governing England, he transfers the power of governing a colony to one of his allies.

In the case of Maryland territories, he named George Calvert as the Lord of Baltimore. Anyway, the first colonial governor of Maryland was George's son, as George died 5 weeks before.

A compound is a substance made up of many components linked by a chemical connection.

MgO = Magnesium Oxide

NaH = Sodium Hydride

AlBr3 = Aluminum Bromide

FeS = Iron (ii) Sulphide

These are all ionic structures, meaning they're made up of one metal and one non-metal ion.

The metal ion is usually in front of the nonmetal ion in the chemical formulae of these ionic compounds.

Make sure to give their element name instead of their ion name when identifying nonmetals (or metals).

For example, the ions magnesium and oxide ion are named after the elements magnesium and oxygen in MgO, although the elements are magnesium and oxygen.

For more information about chemical compounds, refer below

https://brainly.com/question/6814845

Answer:

B. obtaining a search warrant

Explanation:

Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles, and that individuals be treated fairly. Due process applies to both civil and criminal matters.

An example of a due process from the options listed is : ( B ) Obtaining a search warrant

Due process is the course or process followed during formal proceedings. and it is carried following a set of established rules and principles. In order to search a building or personal belongings the first step is to obtain a search warrant from a competent court.

Hence we can conclude that An example of a due process from the options listed is : ( B ) Obtaining a search warrant

Learn more about due process : https://brainly.com/question/711394

#SPJ2

Answer:

Roosevelt utilized the Doctrine of Monroe, a party that was started in 1800. The part opposed the colonialism of the Europeans in America. It, therefore, added Roosevelt in earlier 1900. The doctrine states that the US was free to exercise the power of international police. This was aimed to justify American intervention in other countries.

Roosevelt having been considered as progressive, he pushed for reforms that saw industries established and worked towards making American to acquire power and rule all the states.

Roosevelt could have used the Monroe Doctrine to justify US involvement in the Venezuelan crisis and in Santo Domingo by:

According to the Monroe Doctrine which was put in place during the independence of the United States of America was against colonialism against countries in the Western Hemisphere by Europeans with the threat of military action.

As a result of this, President Theodore Roosevelt could have used this doctrine to intervene in the Venezuelan crisis and Santo Domingo as this was justifiable grounds to intervene.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/1808198

To avoid Primary Mortgage Insurance (PMI) ,you need to have the loan balance be 80% or less of the home value.Therefore,Tania needs to give a down payment of at least 20% of $135000

= 20/100 * 135000 = $27000

So Tania needs to pay $27000 down payment or more in order to avoid PMI( Primary Mortgage Insurance ).

Final answer:

Tania needs to make a down payment of $27,000, which is 20% of the $135,000 home price, to avoid PMI. PMI protects lenders from default and is an extra cost for buyers who put down less than 20%.

Explanation:

The question asks how big Tania's down payment needs to be in order to avoid Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) when buying a $135,000 home. To avoid PMI, borrowers are generally required to make a down payment of at least 20% of the home's purchase price. In Tania's case, a 20% down payment on a $135,000 home would be:

$135,000 x 20% = $27,000.

Therefore, Tania would need to make a down payment of $27,000 to avoid paying for PMI. PMI is a type of insurance that protects the lender from the risk of default and foreclosure, and it's an additional cost for buyers who put down less than 20% of the home's price.

The statement is - False.

The Egyptians, from all types of social status, were believing that there are two lives, one is here on the Earth, and the other is up in the sky with the Gods, the afterlife. They took this very seriously, and it was extremely important for them to respect the Gods and how they live in their first life on the Earth, in order to manage to get a better place and respectable place in the afterlife.

In Athenas, 1. The government is a direct democracy, 4. The assembly is the main body of government and 5. Debate is an important part of government.

Athenian government features included direct democracy, the Assembly as the main governing body, and significant emphasis on debate. While the military was important, the concept of two kings leading as generals does not apply to Athens.

The Athenian government in ancient Greece had several distinctive features. Among those features, we can confirm that the government is a direct democracy, the assembly is the main body of government, and debate is an important part of government. The citizens of Athens were actively involved in civic participation, voting rights were granted to male citizens, and legislative bodies, such as the Assembly and the Council of 500, were central to the democratic process. The military was indeed significant in Athens, but there were not two kings as head generals; instead, there were ten generals elected annually by the Assembly.

Your answer will be... A because At the First Continental Congress, the delegates discussed boycotting British goods all with each other, but decided to send the Crown a list of their grievances in the hopes of getting the Acts were established.

Answer:

The correct answer is A. At the First Continental Congress, it was decided to call for a boycott of all British imports.

Explanation:

On September 5, 1774, representatives of the assemblies of the colonies met in Philadelphia. The dilemma facing Congress was not simple because it had to show firmness before the British Government and, in turn, had to curb the independence wishes of the Sons of Liberty, which alarmed the conservative sectors, more likely to reach an agreement with the Crown.

Congress passed a Declaration of Rights and Grievances addressed to the people of Great Britain and the colonies, and also approved a petition to the king. Both documents recognized Parliament's right to regulate foreign trade but defended the right of the colonies to manage their own internal affairs without the intervention of the imperial government.

It was also decided to declare a trade boycott against the metropolis. Starting December 1, 1774, both the purchase of English goods and the sale of American goods to the British were prohibited. This decision was a response to the blockade of Boston by the English fleet. It was also decided to convene a second Continental Congress on May 10, 1775.

Answer:

c.

to demonstrate a tombstone

The artist included the inscription on the wooden desk in the image is to demonstrate a tombstone. Option (c) is correct.

An inscription is lettering that has been carved into a piece of metal or stone, such a gravestone or medal.

Media, concepts, themes, and pure creative imagination all play a role in the creation of visual art. But they all rely on fundamental structural principles that, just like the components we've been learning about, work together to give artistic expression voice. The principles can help in the process of discovering the meaning of an artwork by allowing you to objectively describe works of art that you may not fully comprehend.

Therefore, Option (c) is correct. The artist included the inscription on the wooden desk in the image is to demonstrate a tombstone.

Learn more about Inscription, here;

https://brainly.com/question/14205911

#SPJ2

The correct answers are:

The abolition of slavery in the United States.

The founding of the Republican Party.

Jackson was not in favor of getting rid of slavery. His belief in a small federal government and states rights allowed for slavery to continue in the United States.

Along with this, Jackson was a Democrat, not a Republican. All of the other statements about Jackson are true.

Jacksonian democracy aimed to extend political power to the common man, reduce the influence of the elite, and expand economic opportunities. It did not support increased political power for wealthy landowners, opposed the expansion of individual rights, and sought to limit the power of the federal government.

To identify the statements that do NOT describe a characteristic of Jacksonian democracy, we need to understand what Jacksonian democracy is. Jacksonian democracy refers to the political movement during the presidency of Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) in the United States. It aimed to extend political power to the common man, emphasizing the importance of white male suffrage, reducing the influence of the elite, and supporting the expansion of economic opportunities.

Therefore, the statements that do NOT describe a characteristic of Jacksonian democracy would be:

Increased political power for wealthy landowners: Jacksonian democracy sought to reduce the influence of the elite and redistribute political power to the common man, not concentrate it in the hands of wealthy landowners.

Opposition to the expansion of individual rights: Jacksonian democracy fought for the expansion of individual rights and the removal of property ownership as a qualification for voting.

Increase in the power of the federal government: Jacksonian democracy actually sought to limit the power of the federal government and uphold states' rights.

Learn more about Jacksonian democracy

https://brainly.com/question/795956

#SPJ3

Out of the statements provided, the true one is that each religion has groups within it that hold different beliefs. Christianity, Judaism, and Islam are all monotheistic Abrahamic faiths with differences in practices, sacred texts, and interpretations within each religion.

Among the choices given regarding Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, the statement that each religion has groups within it that hold different beliefs is true. All three religions are Abrahamic faiths, acknowledging Abraham as a significant patriarch, and they hold the concept of pilgrimage, but they have different practices and sacred texts. Islam, the youngest of the three, follows the Qur'an as its sacred text, while Christianity uses the Bible, and Judaism adheres to the Torah. While Islam includes the Hajj to Mecca as a once-in-a-lifetime pilgrimage, this is not a requirement in Christianity and Judaism.

Muslims believe that all three religions originated from the same monotheistic roots but diverged due to interpretations over time. The followers of these religions recognize the significance of prophets, with Muslims considering Muhammad as the final prophet. Each of these faiths has various sects or denominations, each with their own interpretations of beliefs, practices, and doctrine. For instance, Christianity has denominations like Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox; Judaism is split into Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform branches; and Islam is divided into Sunni, Shia, and other sects.

Final answer:

All three religions, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, have similarities and differences in their use of holy texts, fasting practices, diversity within the faiths, and pilgrimage.

Explanation:

All three religions, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, have similarities and differences. They each have their own holy texts, with Christianity using the Bible, Judaism using the Torah, and Islam using the Qur'an. Fasting is actually practiced in all three religions as an act of worship, with Christianity and Judaism having specific fasting traditions, such as Lent and Yom Kippur, and Islam having the month-long fast of Ramadan. Each religion also has different groups within it that hold different beliefs, with different denominations and sects. Finally, Islam has the concept of pilgrimage to the Holy Land of Mecca, which is required of all Muslims who are able, while Christianity and Judaism do not have a specific pilgrimage requirement.

They were hell in conservation camps , due to the government thinking they would turn on the us

Question: What happened to the Japanese Americans during World War II?

I think that your answer would be:

These two quotations from John Winthrop and John Archdale tells us the the British despise the Americans Indians: they are thankful for the diseases that are killing them fast, and believed is a work of God who want the British to rule and poses that land.

Answer:

The quotations show that the English did not see the spread of smallpox as a bad development. On the contrary, they were delighted by this turn of events. The English military in the Americas, in fact, helped spread the disease. Some English commanders urged their troops to try to spread smallpox by giving infected blankets to the Indians. Because smallpox and other diseases wiped out millions, the English were able to capture territories once controlled by American Indians.

Explanation:

this is the sample answer so you may want to change the wording a bit

The correct answers:

The Open Door policy aimed at assuring the United States had equal access to trade in China.  The Open Door policy was issued by the United States in 1899-1900 as a series of dispatches from the US Secretary of State to other nations that had trading interests in China --  Great Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, and Russia.  The policy reasserted earlier agreements that all countries should have equal access to ports in China, with no favored "spheres of influence" for one nation or another.  The United States was seeking to maintain an equal footing with other nations in the access to trade in China.  

Answer:

b,c  The United States would have trouble trading with China if other countries controlled Chinese trade.

The United States would have little influence if China was already divided into areas of foreign control.

Explanation:

on edgy

1. The belief that a Spanish Mine had blown up the battleship Maine.

2. They feared a Spanish conquest of Florida

3. Yellow journalism

1: The belief that a Spanish mine had blown up the battleship Maine

2. Many men volunteered for military service

3. Yellow Journalism

~Sarah Robinsen