How did world war ii change the role of the united states in the world?

Answer:Orwell places the Party in the period of Stalin's rise to power and the institution of Stalinism in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

Explanation:

Answer:

C Is the correct option.

Explanation:

The reason behind dropping the atomic bombs on japan was to seek Japanese surrender. The Surrender of japan was officially signed on September 2,1945. Britain, US and china had asked for unconditional surrender of Japan in the Postdam declaration. But Japanese forces were still continuing the fight ,The supreme council for the direction of the War were in talk with soviet union to make the peace terms more favorable to the Japanese. The US bombed Hiroshima on 6th August asking for Unconditional surrender of Japan. But when Japanese forces didn't surrender ,The US dropped the second bomb on Nagasaki. It was after the detonation of second bomb that  the Emperor Hirohito ordered the Supreme Council for the Direction of the war to accept terms of postdam declaration.

Answer:

cause Japan to surrender

Political parties' primary role is to engage citizens with the U.S. government by offering party platforms, recruiting candidates, and mobilizing volunteers, thereby providing a clear set of political choices and facilitating participation in the democratic process that is Polling citizens to assess their opinions. Hence option D is correct.

The primary role of political parties in helping citizens engage with the U.S. government is to offer a framework for political participation and choice, which is essential for democratic governance. Political parties are fundamentally linking institutions that connect citizens to the government. They provide a collection of viewpoints or opinions, often referred to as party platforms, which articulate how the government and society should be governed. Moreover, political parties play a crucial role in recruiting individuals to run for public office, thereby providing voters with a clear choice of candidates who align with specific political beliefs and policy priorities.

Traditionally, political parties have been instrumental in mobilizing people by recruiting volunteers for campaigns and other political events, thus serving as a breeding ground for candidates and leaders. However, the specific statement that best describes how political parties help engage citizens with the U.S. government is option D.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Aristotle described three forms of rhetorical proof in his treatise on rhetoric: ethos, logos, and pathos, which relate to the speaker's credibility, logical reasoning, and emotional appeal, respectively.

In his treatise on rhetoric, the Greek philosopher Aristotle described three forms of rhetorical proof: ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos pertains to the speaker's credibility and encompasses competence, trustworthiness, and dynamism. Logos refers to the logical appeal, meaning the use of reasoning and evidence to persuade an audience. Pathos involves the emotional appeal, which aims to evoke an emotional response from the audience to gain their support. These three modes of persuasion are essential for effective argumentation and are still prominently used in communication strategies today.

White Southerners defended slavery using arguments centered on paternalism, states' rights, and racial superiority, juxtaposing their system of enslavement with Northern wage labor to legitimize and morally justify the institution. They created a narrative that obscured the harsh realities of slavery and emphasized the supposed benefits of their social order for all involved.

White Southerners used several defenses to uphold the institution of slavery, deeply intertwining it with their social, economic, and cultural life. The elite promoted a culture of honor and superiority, asserting that slavery was beneficial not only for the economic prosperity of the South but also for the moral and physical well-being of enslaved Africans, an argument underpinned by racial superiority and paternalism.

Critics of abolitionism highlighted the ills of Northern wage slavery, arguing that the Southern slave system was more humane and provided better care for the enslaved. This justification of slavery relied on concepts such as paternalism, the racial superiority of whites, and the critique of Northern capitalism, presenting a stark contrast between Southern chivalry and Northern exploitation. The defense strategies ranged from legal arguments about states' rights and property to moral and religious justifications that misrepresented the brutal realities of slavery.

Digital technology, fiber optics, and microprocessors are  advanced technologies that have increased globalization.

Digital technology includes all forms of electronic equipment and applications that utilize information in the form of numeric code.

An optical fiber is a flexible, transparent fiber made by drawing glass (silica) or plastic to a diameter slightly thicker than that of a human hair.

A microprocessorrefers to a computer processor that incorporates the functions of a core processing unit on a single integrated circuit (IC), or at most a few integrated circuits.

The United States government's response to the Great Depression was different after Franklin Roosevelt's election in the sense that it increased spending based on Keynesian economic principles.

Following the stock market crisis in October 1929, which paralyzed Wall Street and destroyed millions of investors, the Great Depression officially started. Consumer spending and investment fell during the following years, which led to sharp drops in industrial output and employment as faltering businesses laid off workers.

Keynes contended that lengthy periods of high unemployment could result from a lack of overall demand. Consumption, investment, government purchases, and net exports (the difference between what a country sells to and buys from foreign countries) are the four factors that make up an economy's output of goods and services.

To learn more about Great Depression here:

https://brainly.com/question/27291778

#SPJ3

Final answer:

The Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson maintained that laws mandating racial segregation were constitutional under the 'separate but equal' doctrine, with facilities for both races being equal and segregation not inherently implying discrimination or inferiority.

Explanation:

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the majority of the Supreme Court maintained that Jim Crow laws mandating racial segregation were constitutional under the "separate but equal" doctrine. The facts involved Homer Plessy, a man of mixed racial heritage, who was arrested for sitting in a whites-only railroad car. Plessy argued that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was violated by Louisiana's segregation law. However, the Supreme Court ruled that as long as the separate facilities for blacks and whites were equal, segregation did not imply discrimination or inferiority and thus did not violate the constitution.

De jure segregation, or legal segregation, was therefore deemed constitutional by the court's ruling. The court's opinion reinforced the doctrine of "separate but equal," founding its justification on tradition, social customs, and the supposed maintenance of public peace and order. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision upheld state laws requiring the separation of races in public places, legitimizing a brand of discrimination that would persist until the civil rights movement significantly challenged and eventually overturned such statutes.

Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and Woodrow Wilson each had distinct approaches to imperialism, ranging from military intervention to economic influence and moral diplomacy.

Theodore Roosevelt's imperial policies, often summarized by his motto "speak softly, and carry a big stick," emphasized military power and strategic expansion. He was instrumental in the construction of the Panama Canal and enforced the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, asserting the right of the US to intervene in Latin America to preserve stability and order.

William Howard Taft followed a policy known as "Dollar Diplomacy," which aimed to extend American influence by encouraging investment in Latin American countries and China.

Rather than relying solely on military intervention, Taft's approach sought to create economic dependencies that would benefit both the US and the target nations.

Woodrow Wilson's approach to imperialism was initially more idealistic, promoting self-determination and democracy, encapsulated in his "Moral Diplomacy." However, he still deployed military forces in Latin America to protect American interests, as seen in interventions in Mexico, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic.

The major factors that drove US imperialism included the desire for new markets, access to natural resources, and strategic military locations, combined with the belief in American cultural and racial superiority.

The most important impact of the NOW and different women agencies will be the bill of rights that they installed for women. This made society treat them, anyone, the same regardless of their gender. This made and set a path for identical wages, equal positions, and maximum crucial, same morals and appreciation.

The women's rights movement, additionally known as the women's liberation movement, was a diverse social movement, in large part based within America, that in the Sixties and '70s sought equal rights and opportunities and more non-public freedom for women. It coincided with and is identified as part of the “2nd wave” of feminism.

Learn more about feminism here: https://brainly.com/question/1092730

#SPJ2

Answer:

3. Weapons of mass destruction

Explanation:

The Justification of the Iraq War (which includes the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and subsequent hostilities) has been a subject of much discussion since the George Bush Administration began major military pressure in Iraq in late 2001. The main justification for the war in Iraq it was created through a joint resolution between the United States Congress known as the Iraq Resolution.

The United States mentioned that the intervention was intended to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that housed and supported the development of terrorist groups, committed outrageous human rights violations, and defied the demands of the United Nations. and the whole world "Additional reasons have been suggested such as" changing the Middle East landscape and denying military support to Islam through military pressure on the countries that support it "The justification for the invasion of Iraq was" the United States , taking into account the authority of the Security Council of the United Nations and its resolutions 678 and 687, decided to invade Iraq and use all necessary means to get Iraq to respond and adopt the measures requested by the international community. "