How was cotton still “king” at the start of World War I?
A. It was grown by most southerners.
B. Those who had accumulated wealth in cotton before the Civil War still held it.
C. Cotton production supported the leading industry.
D. The ideas of the antebellum cotton plantation were still strong

Answer:

B) Birmingham Protests

Explanation:

The Birmingham protests, Birmingham campaign or the Birmingham movement was a movement that initiated in Birmingham, Alabama in early 1963. This movement wanted to bring attention to the integration efforts of the South. It consisted of a series of nonviolent protests that culminated in large confrontations between black students and white authorities. The protests were very influential in changing the racially discriminatory practices of the city.

The blitzkrieg or "Lightning War" was a German tactic, the use of a combination of mobile forces of aviation, artillery, tanks and infantry, mainly, which created a complete disorganization among hostile forces. Successful execution of this tactic leads to short military actions that saves people's lives and limits the expenditure of artillery. The implementation of this tactic enabled the successful conquest of Belgium, the Netherlands and France in Europe, and also used Rommel during a campaign in North Africa.

After the French and Indian War, Great Britain gained territory from France as stipulated by the Treaty of Paris of 1763, including lands east of the Mississippi River and Spanish Florida, while New Orleans and Louisiana were excluded.

As a result of the French and Indian War, concluded by the Treaty of Paris of 1763, Great Britain acquired a large expanse of territory from France. This included all the land east of the Mississippi River, as well as Spanish Florida. However, New Orleans and Louisiana were exceptions, remaining under Spanish and later French control.

The British Empire thus became the dominant European power in eastern North America, though the transfer of land rights from France to Great Britain was contested by France's Indian allies. Despite the paper victory, British mastery over the newly acquired lands was challenged by several native confederacies, leading to an understated yet persistent conflict in the region.

The War of 1812 was primarily caused by British impressment of American sailors and support for Native American resistance, along with trade restrictions and a push from U.S. 'war hawks' to defend national honor.

The causes of the War of 1812, sometimes referred to as the Second War of American Independence, were rooted in a variety of unresolved issues between the United States and Great Britain after the Revolutionary War. One significant cause was the British practice of impressment, where the British navy would force American sailors into service on their warships. This blatant disregard for American sovereignty was a direct challenge to the young nation's independence and autonomy.

Another contributing factor was Britain's military support for Native Americans resisting U.S. westward expansion. These acts of aggression, combined with restrictions on U.S. trade due to British blockades in the Napoleonic Wars, demonstrated a lack of respect for U.S. neutrality. Political pressures from the "war hawks" like Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun, who advocated for defending U.S. national honor, helped tip the scales in favor of declaring war on Britain in 1812.

By 1970, Nixon and his supporters believed in prioritizing stability and resonating with the concerns of the 'silent majority.' His campaign emphasized law and order, ending the Vietnam War, criticising the Supreme Court's decisions, and was inconsistent in its attitude towards civil rights and desegregation, with some moderate policies concerning African American economic advancement.

By 1970, President Richard Nixon and his supporters generally believed that their strategy needed to focus on prioritizing stability in American society, appealing to the anxieties and interests of the majority, which he termed as the 'silent majority.' This included many blue-collar, northern white workers, and southern whites, who were unsettled by anti-war protests, racial tensions, and the increasing focus of the government on the problems of marginalized groups such as African Americans.

Nixon's campaign was based on law and order, and he vehemently criticized the social changes taking place. He also promised to bring an honorable end to the Vietnam War. Nixon contended that the Supreme Court had overstepped its jurisdiction in defending the rights of those accused under state law, accusing it of 'coddling criminals.'

Once President, Nixon took actions reflecting these beliefs, showing a neglectful attitude towards the civil rights movement, and intentionally slowed the pace of school desegregation. Despite these controversial stances, Nixon adopted some moderate to supportive measures in economic policies that benefitted African Americans, such as the expansion of affirmative action. Nixon also prioritized foreign policy alongside these domestic issues.

https://brainly.com/question/29752708

#SPJ12

The terms 'Robber Barons' and 'Captains of Industry' are most closely associated with the Gilded Age in American history. Industrialists like Andrew Carnegie, J.P Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, and Andrew Mellon rose to prominence during this era.

The terms 'Robber Barons' and 'Captains of Industry' are most closely associated with the Gilded Age in American history. During this period, industrialists like Andrew Carnegie, J.P Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, and Andrew Mellon rose to prominence.

They were often referred to as 'Robber Barons' due to their controversial business practices, including forming monopolies and trusts to control large portions of the economy. At the same time, they were also seen as 'Captains of Industry' because they played a crucial role in developing America's industrial economy and creating jobs.

Two key ideologies associated with this era were the 'Gospel of Wealth' and 'Social Darwinism.' The Gospel of Wealth, popularized by Andrew Carnegie, argued that the wealthy had a moral obligation to use their wealth for the benefit of society. Social Darwinism, on the other hand, applied the idea of natural selection to society, suggesting that the wealthy were naturally superior and deserving of their wealth.

https://brainly.com/question/34609878

#SPJ2

Answer:

Body paragraph 1: Structure

Explanation:

This paragraph would be important for your essay or paper. It would be there you must explain your methods and the hypotesis you may develop.

The overtaking of Japan's government by military leaders favored an aggressive expansionary policy that would result in the control of much of the territory of Southeast Asia by the empire of Japan. The event that signaled the start of this period was the invasion of the Chinese region of Manchuria in 1937 and it would end with Japan's surrender to the Allies during the Second World War in August of 1945.

The Slaughterhouse Cases resulted in a narrow interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, reinforcing states' authority in regulating health and welfare, and impacted subsequent Supreme Court decisions, like Lochner v. New York, until shifts during the New Deal era.

The Slaughterhouse Cases, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1873, had long-term effects on the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, particularly its Privileges or Immunities Clause. The Court's decision, which was based on the contention that the Fourteenth Amendment only provided a narrow range of federal protections, effectively limited the scope of the amendment's protection of individual rights against state interference. This narrow interpretation resulted in states retaining a wide latitude in regulating health, welfare, and public morals without as much federal oversight, which persisted until the New Deal when the Supreme Court began to adopt a broader interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Important cases such as Lochner v. New York were influenced by precedents set in the Slaughterhouse Cases. Lochner upheld an individual's right to contract by declaring a state law that capped working hours unconstitutional, reinforcing the Slaughterhouse Cases' precedent of a limited role for federal intervention in state matters concerning economic regulation. However, this approach shifted during the New Deal era, with cases like A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, eventually leading to a period of cooperative federalism where federal and state governments worked more closely in regulating aspects of the economy and individual welfare.

Final answer:

The Slaughterhouse Cases limited the Fourteenth Amendment's scope, influenced economic regulation by allowing states to regulate industries, and shaped federalism by defining the balance between state and federal powers in terms of individual rights and economic regulation.

Explanation:

Long-Term Effects of the Slaughterhouse Cases-

The Slaughterhouse Cases were a set of decisions made by the Supreme Court in 1873. These cases had far-reaching long-term effects on how the Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause was interpreted. One significant long-term effect was the limitation of the protections afforded to citizens under this clause to a narrow set, mostly associated with national citizenship rather than state citizenship. This interpretation for many years made it difficult to apply the Fourteenth Amendment in cases that involved state infringement of rights.

Another long-term impact was on economic regulation. By ruling against the butchers in New Orleans who challenged state-imposed monopolies on their trade, the Court set a precedent that allowed states considerable leeway in regulating industries within their borders. This decision influenced future cases such as Lochner v. New York, wherein the Supreme Court invalidated state laws that were aimed at protecting workers, invoking the doctrine of 'liberty of contract' which emerged from the laissez-faire economic stance bolstered by the Slaughterhouse Cases.

Furthermore, these cases influenced the concept of federalism. They marked an important moment in the shaping of the relationship between federal and state powers, particularly around issues of individual rights and economic regulation. Essentially, the Slaughterhouse Cases helped to define the balance of power between state and federal governments, a dynamic that continues to affect legal and political questions today.

Answer:

did not appease most American citizens.

Explanation:

Answer:

Well the island are getting bigger.

Explanation:

Answer: A. There Not enough workers with the four year college degree

Explanation: Just took the test and got it right.