I need help asap! 20 POINTS

Put the European explorers and their journeys in the order in which they happened.

There were a little bit of both but in my opinion mostly positive

For telling the truth

Question 1: They developed a decimal system with a numeral for zero.

An important development in mathematics during this period was the decimal system notation. The powers of ten with null coefficients were used in order to indicate "zero."

Question 2: Chandragupta II

Chandragupta II was one of the most powerful emperor of the Gupta Empire. Under his rule (c. 380-c. 415) the Gupta Empire reached its greatest size. He was a great supporter of the arts and his rule is often referred to as the “Golden Age” of India.

Question 3: Chess

Chess is believed to have originated in India during the Gupta Empire in the 6th century. Afterwards, it spread through the Silk Road.

Advancements in Gupta mathematics include the development of a decimal system with zero (C), and the Gupta Empire reached its greatest size under Samudragupta (C). Chess (C) was the game invented in India.

Advancements in Gupta Period Mathematics

During the Gupta period, mathematics in India underwent a significant transformation. The mathematicians of this era developed a decimal system with a numeral for zero, which was critical for advancing mathematical calculation. The correct answer to how advancements during the Gupta period transformed mathematics is C. They developed a decimal system with a numeral for zero. They also calculated the value of pi with high precision and recognized the importance of negative numbers. Their work was foundational for future developments in mathematics across the world.

The Greatest Extent of the Gupta Empire

The Gupta Empire reached its zenith in terms of size and power under the reign of Samudra Gupta. Thus, the answer to the question under whose reign did the Gupta empire reach its greatest size is C. Samudragupta. After his reign, the empire enjoyed a period of stability and prosperity before eventually declining.

Origin of Chess

The game of chess has its origins in India, and it is widely acknowledged that it was invented there. Therefore, the game invented in India is C. chess. Chess is just one example of the cultural legacy of India that has spread throughout the world.

One of President Clinton’s early strategies for improving the economy was increasing taxes.

As an attempt to reduce the budget deficit of the U.S., President Clinton enacted the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, a few months after he was inaugurated.

This first Act established measures to cut spending and increase taxes, for example, the legislation increased the marginal tax rate for incomes of over $180,000 annually, from 31 to 36%, and for those earning over $250,000 it added 10% more. It also increased the corporate income tax from 34 to 36% for those with incomes over $10 million. It ended subsidies to some corporations and it taxed on Social Security benefits for high-income earners.

The correct option is C.

President Clinton's early strategy for improving the economy was increasing taxes. This was part of a broader effort to reduce the federal deficit and stabilize the economy.

One of President Clinton's early strategies for improving the economy was increasing taxes. When he took office in 1993, he aimed to reduce the federal deficit that had grown during previous administrations.

Clinton introduced a tax increase in 1994, targeting wealthier Americans and introducing measures to curb spending. This policy, along with other fiscal adjustments, helped shift the budget from a deficit to a surplus by the end of the 1990s.

Freedom of speech in the United States - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

Here you will find your answer. Good luck

The development of the political parties formed in the early republican can be attributed to the rivalry between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton.

Jefferson was a strong anti-federalist and would help to develop the Democratic-Republican party. Jefferson's focus on a small central government, states rights, and developing a nation based on independent farmers was a message that spoke to many rural communities.

On the other hand, there was Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton favored a strong central government, the development of an industrialized economy, and a loose interpretation of the US Constitution. Hamilton was supported by Northern merchants and wealthy elites, especially in the Northeast.

These two vastly different goals for America helped to spark the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties in the United States during the early Republic.

The early U.S. political parties, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, were formed due to ideological differences regarding the direction of the nation during the early republic. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, supported a strong central government and commercial economy, while the Democrats, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, advocated for states' rights and an agrarian economy.

In the 1790s, the formation of political parties was an unanticipated outcome that the framers of the Constitution did not envision. The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans emerged from conflicting visions for the future of the United States. Alexander Hamilton's Federalists favored a strong federal government, a centralized banking system, and close ties with Britain for commercial growth. In contrast, the Democratic-Republicans, championed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, supported more power for the states, an economy based on farming, and sympathy for the French revolutionary cause. The partisan politics of the time were intensified by events such as the French Revolution and the Whiskey Rebellion, which emphasized the deep divisions within the country. This emerging dual-party system organized opposition and offered clear alternatives, leading to the first partisan presidential election in 1796 and setting the stage for what eventually became organized and highly structured modern political parties in the United States.

The correct answer is - C. 1975 - 1999.

The period between 1975 and 1999 was a period in which the world population grew for around 2 billion people. Even thought that is the same rise as in the period between 1930 and 1975, still this period is shorter, and is just 24 years the world population grew from approximately 4 billion people to approximately 6 billion people.  

Answer:

It's C on ED 2023

Explanation:

Answer:

Roe v. Wade is the name of the case of 1973, by which the Supreme Court of the United States decriminalized - by a divided decision of 7 against 2 - induced abortion in that country.

In 1970, newly graduated lawyers from the University of Texas Law School, Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington, filed a lawsuit in Texas representing Norma L. McCorvey ("Jane Roe"). McCorvey maintained that her pregnancy had been the product of an abuse. The District Attorney for Dallas County, Texas, Henry Wade, represented the State of Texas, which opposed abortion. The District Court ruled in favor of Jane Roe, but refused to establish a restriction against abortion laws.

The case was appealed on repeated occasions until it finally reached the Supreme Court of Justice of the United States, which finally decided in 1973 that women, protected by the right to privacy - under the "due process clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment - could choose whether or not to continue with the pregnancy; that right to privacy was considered a fundamental right under the protection of the US Constitution and therefore could not be legislated against by any state.

"Jane Roe" gave birth to her daughter while the case had not yet been decided. The baby was given up for adoption. Roe v. Wade was finally decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, leading to a landmark decision on abortion. According to this decision, most anti-abortion laws in the United States violated the constitutional right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The decision forced to modify all federal and state laws that proscribed or restricted abortion and that were contrary to the new decision.

This decision of the Court was interpreted as the decriminalization of abortion for the 50 states of the Union.

In 1995 Norma McCorvey regretted her actions and acknowledged that part of her testimony at the trial was not true. McCorvey alleges that she became a "pawn" for two ambitious young lawyers who were looking for a plaintiff who could change the legislation that prohibited abortion in the State of Texas. Sarah Weddington, the lawyer who litigated Roe v. Wade in the Supreme Court, explained in a speech at the Institute of Educational Ethics in Oklahoma, why she used the false charges of sexual abuse, up to the Supreme Court: "My conduct may not have been totally ethical. But I did it because of what I thought were good reasons". In 2005, she asked the Supreme Court to review the 1973 ruling, arguing that the case should be seen again due to new evidence of the harm that the procedure causes to the victims, but the request was denied.

Roe v. Wade was a controversial case due to its legalization of abortion and the deeply divisive nature of the issue, sparking debates over moral, religious, and constitutional grounds, while ongoing legal challenges and societal impact further fueled the controversy.

Roe v. Wade was a controversial case for several reasons, primarily due to the highly sensitive and divisive nature of the issue it addressed. The case, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1973, established the legal right to abortion.

1. Abortion and Reproductive Rights: The central issue of Roe v. Wade was the right to abortion. The case involved a woman, known by the pseudonym "Jane Roe," who challenged a Texas law that criminalized abortion except to save the life of the mother. The Supreme Court's decision legalized abortion across the United States, striking down many state-level restrictions on abortion.

2. Moral and Religious Beliefs: Abortion is a deeply contentious moral and religious issue. The case pitted pro-choice advocates, who argued for a woman's right to make decisions about her own body, against pro-life advocates, who viewed abortion as the taking of an innocent human life and believed it should be restricted or banned.

3. Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint: Critics of the decision, including some legal scholars, argued that the Supreme Court overstepped its authority by legislating from the bench rather than interpreting the Constitution narrowly. They accused the Court of judicial activism, claiming that the right to abortion was not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution and, therefore, should have been left to the states to decide.

4. Lack of Consensus: The Court's decision in Roe v. Wade was not unanimous, with a 7-2 vote in favor of legalizing abortion. This lack of consensus added to the controversy surrounding the ruling and fueled ongoing debates about its legitimacy.

5. Ongoing Legal Challenges: Since the Roe v. Wade decision, there have been numerous legal challenges and attempts to overturn or restrict abortion rights at the federal and state levels. This has kept the controversy alive and made abortion a significant political issue for decades.

6. Societal Impact: The ruling had a profound impact on society, influencing public opinion, political discourse, and activism on both sides of the issue. It has been a rallying point for political campaigns and remains a contentious topic in national and state-level elections.

Overall, the contentious nature of the abortion debate, combined with the Supreme Court's decision to legalize abortion on a national scale, has made Roe v. Wade one of the most controversial and polarizing cases in modern American legal history. The case continues to shape the abortion debate and remains a significant factor in discussions about individual rights, government authority, and the role of the judiciary.

Learn more on Roe v. Wade here;

https://brainly.com/question/26994127

#SPJ6

Massachusetts colony.

Because religion tends to give people an ease of heart, and allows them to have a sense of hope, and that the conflict or trial they're dealing with will soon be over or will start to look better for them. It consoles them.

Religions grow in times of conflict or trial because they provide support, foster community, and offer explanations for complex issues. They can also promote or challenge social norms, and adapt with societal changes to reflect people's realities. Their transnational nature and leadership can significantly influence world events.

Religions tend to grow in times of conflict or trial because they offer spiritual and material support, foster a sense of community, and often provide explanations for complex and challenging circumstances. Under conditions of societal stress, conflict, or instability, many people turn to religion for comfort, guidance, and understanding. For example, religious leaders may offer interpretations of events within the context of divine will or fate.

Religion often acts as a conservative force that reinforces societal norms and helps to maintain social inequality, as the conflict theorists suggest. When conflicts arise, the structures and doctrines of religions may be used to justify or respond to these challenges. In some cases, religion can also instigate social change by challenging existing social norms and structures, as in the case of the Protestant Reformation.

Moreover, religions also adapt with societal changes. Their beliefs and practices reflect the realities of people's lives and can incorporate new features while retaining older ones. As a transnational entity, the actions and statements of religious leaders and groups can significantly impact world affairs, highlighting the critical role of religion during times of conflict or trial.

https://brainly.com/question/18909185

#SPJ3

The correct answer is C) Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission.

The state agency charged with protecting wildlife in Oklahoma is the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission.

The Commission work to get the necessary funds to operate the protection programs for the conservation of wildlife in Oklahoma. It is dedicated to protecting fish, animals, and habitats regulating hunting activities and educating people and children of the importance of taking care of nature and animal biodiversity in Oklahoma.

The Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission is the state agency responsible for protecting wildlife in Oklahoma, and managing wildlife populations at the state level.

The state agency charged with protecting wildlife in Oklahoma is the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission. This organization is primarily responsible for managing wildlife populations within the state. While federal agencies such as the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the National Park Service (NPS) are tasked with managing wildlife habitat, the state agencies typically have the authority to set population levels and manage the actual species within their borders, unless otherwise directed by federal legislation like the Endangered Species Act.

Your answer would be D a sign of respect or courtesy for another's position is correct clearly the soldiers and officers surrounding the man with the rope around his neck are showing respect for him and what is about time happen.  If they were willing to consider his feelings or submit to his wishes,  they would probably take the ripe off his neck,  and no words have been spoken by anyone in the passage.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

A sign of respect or courtesy for another's position is correct. Clearly, the soldiers and officers surrounding the man with the rope around his neck are showing respect for him and what is about to happen. If they were willing to consider his feelings or submit to his wishes, they would probably take the rope off his neck, and no words have been spoken by anyone in the passage.

C) The historian may acknowledge their perspectives on the study and use other narratives.

The correct answer is A) An historian may keep asking more questions, keep searching other sources, and keep writing.

A historian can acknowledge personal bias yet stay true to the historic method by asking more questions, keep searching other sources, and keep writing.

The historian knows that he has to maintain its objectivity all the time when doing research. If by any motive it shows bias, it is b¿very important that can differentiate its bias and opinion with facts. It has to be very clear for the reader to know the difference from facts, hard data, from the bias of the author. This way, the historian can add up to its work with more sources, facts, statistics, secondary resources and keep on writing its conclusions.

Zionism and The Holocaust

Answer:

Zionism and The Holocaust

Explanation:

100% on edmentum and plato!

~Pls mark as brainliest!!~

Answer: THE PENTAGON PAPERS

Daniel Ellsberg was the military analyst who leaked "The Pentagon Papers" to the American press in 1971, revealing top secret information about US planning and decision-making in regard to the Vietnam War.  

The Vietnam War had a major impact in shifting public opinion toward distrust of government.  During the Vietnam War, a major credibility gap  became apparent in regard to what the government was telling the American public vs. what was actually taking place.  The term "credibility gap" was used by journalists who questioned the optimistic picture that the Lyndon Johnson administration painted regarding how the war was going, when investigative reporting showed a much more negative reality.

The credibility gap grew especially apparent when the Pentagon Papers (classified documents) were leaked to the press in 1971, showing that the government indeed had been deceiving the public about the plans and conduct of the war over the years.

Answer:

He is right, The Pentagon Papers is the right answer on Odyssey!!

Joint-stock companies are enterprises whose capital is divided in shares which are bought and sold. The purchasers of those shares became owners of the business in the proportion evidenced by the number of shares they hold. This system was used to gather capital from the investors that purchased the shares with low risk.

After obtaining the legitimacy to do so from King James I of England, the joint-stock company Virginia established the first settlement in North America, founding the city of Jamestown in 1607. These companies used the raw materials in the New World, hired the landless native people or English inmigrants and generated wealth in American land since their arrival.

The difference between the British and other manners of colonization such as the Spanish, was that the first was conducted by its people instead of by the rulings of a king. British entrepeneurs gathered capital from investors using the joint-stock model and moved to America to perform their business activities there.

Answer: Raising Money. APEX

D is the right answer

Answer:

Yes D is the right one

Explanation: i took the test

Answer:

It turned into an impoverished tyranny.

Explanation:

North Korea became a poor country ruled by a series of dictators.

It mostly affcted the middle class familys

Answer:

D. They generally vote for the democratic candidates

Explanation:

American public opinion has undergone a profound change in recent decades. Changes in the educational level, in the geographic distribution and in the ethnic composition of the population are altering the bases of support of the two major political parties. The effects of a process that continues to this day.

Final answer:

The Islamic empires refrained from invading Western Europe following their defeat by France due to internal conflicts, fragmentation, and shifting priorities. Military and economic challenges, as well as external threats like the Crusades and Mongol invasions, diverted attention and undermined unified military expansion into Europe.

Explanation:

The Islamic empires chose not to invade Western Europe after their defeat by France for several reasons. Political fragmentation within the Islamic world hindered unified military efforts. Conflicts such as those among the Seljuks, Fatimids, and rivals in Spain, as well as internal strife within individual caliphates, left the Muslim states disunited and weaker. While Islamic societies were experiencing their own successes, they did not undergo the drastic transformations that characterized the political and cultural development of the Western world.

Additionally, economic and military prosperity ebbed and flowed within the Islamic empires, preventing a consistent outward military push towards Western Europe. The European crusades, although initially violent, did not lead to a permanent European settlement and eventually policies of toleration emerged. Moreover, the Islamic regions actively traded and sometimes allied with neighboring territories, which could have deterred them from engaging in expansive wars with Christian Europe. Varied interests, shifting alliances, and local concerns often took precedence over larger religious or imperial ambitions.

Military threats and invasions by the Mongols and Crusaders created significant disruptions, diverting attention and resources that might otherwise have been directed towards Europe. The defeat of the Islamic forces by the French may have shifted the momentum and discouraged further attempts to push into Western Europe at a time when the Islamic states were already dealing with various pressures, both internal and external.

Option B, had no power to impose taxes is the right answer.

The colonies of the United States did not want to have a strong centralized government, because they did not want the government to become a tyranny. Hence, they did not even provide the national government with some very significant powers such as the power of issuing money, imposing taxes, enforcing laws etc.

The leaders of the colonies thought that the power accession would lead to the recolonization of the newly freed American territories. Hence, the Articles of Confederation did not provide the national government with sufficient authority to implement their laws. And this became a major weakness of the national government made under the articles of confederation.

The discovery of gold in the area where native american indians were living and then non compliance to move to reservations ,the US army was sent to confront them.

Custer was unaware of the number of Indians fighting under the command of Sitting Bull  at Little Bighorn, and his forces were outnumbered and quickly overwhelmed in what became known as Custer’s Last Stand.

By the late spring of 1876, more than 10,000 Native Americans had gathered in a camp along the Little Bighorn River which they called the Greasy Grass:in defiance of a U.S. War Department order to return to their reservations or risk being attacked.

Gold was discovered in the Black Hills on land belonging to the Sioux.

Miners and settlers demanded that the government take more land from the American Indians.

The government tried to confine to reservations American Indians in the region.

Follow up question: Which famous general was defeated at the Battle of Little Big Horn?

Ans: B) Gen. George Armstrong Custer

From 1841-1850, 1.3 million people moved  overseas, the greatest part around 70% went to the  USA, the rest of them shipped to Australia and only 2% to  Canada.  A lot of people died because of different diseases during the trip and the conditions were terrible. In the USA, quarantine centers were established for arriving ships, where sick emigrants recovered. The emigration continued until the  First World War. Canada and Australia reacted in a different way, because the amount of emigrants was much lower, the greatest part of emigrants decided to move to the  USA. Emigrants had the poorest jobs and bad conditions for life in the USA.

Not having the money to pay for war supplies and soldiers.

Answer:

Not having the money to pay for war supplies and soldiers.

Explanation:

This was one of the weaknesses of the Colonial Army during the American Revolution. The Colonial Army had several advantages during the war. They shared a common goal and a will to fight for something that they believed in. They also wanted to protect their families, homes and cities, and they possessed better knowledge of the terrain they were fighting on. However, one thing they did not have was adequate money to pay for the expenses of war.

i am positive the answer is B

Let me know if i am wrong and ill correct it

i am pretty sure the answer is b

Artillery (be it cannon,howitzer or mortar) was the biggest killer in WW1 as it accounted for over 75% of all battlefield casualties. Followed by the Machine Gun as the second biggest killer. The machine gun was deadly when it was attacked.

I hope this helps

B) They sought advice from the British about parliamentary government and the rules of common law.