I was a senator who played a key role in development of the compromise of 1850. i introduced the idea of popular sovereignty. who am i?

The likely reason as to how Lee small army troops defeated the Mcclean’s larger force and kept the union troops out of Richmond because Mcclean was being too cautious though it was only on the first day that they won because the following day, Lee’s army lost the battle.

Lee's smaller army defeated McClellan's larger force and kept union troops out of Richmond because McClellan was too cautious.

Further Explanation:

The Battle of Antietam which was also called as Battle of Sharpsburg took place in year 1862. The army of Confederate general Robert E. Lee’s army was pitted against general McClellan's army of Potomac and it was Lee’s last attempt to invade North. The outcome of this battle was important for shaping America’s future and this battle still remains among the deadliest battles every fought in American history. Majority of the troops that Lee had for this battle were hungry and sick. They were using wait and watch tactic of McClellan's army to assemble in creek’s east side.  McClellan's army outnumbered Lee’s army and that too by two to one but McClellan's thought that Lee had larger forces. The troops from both sides faced each other and the deadliest battle in American history started with just 15000 causalities in just eight hours of battle. As the night came, thousands of injured and dead-bodies were lying in the battlefield with majority of soldiers from both sides wounded and badly injured. Next morning, Lee begin the painstaking job and moved his troops back to Virginia but on the other hand McClellan did nothing. He kept union troops out of Richmond because McClellan was too cautious.

Learn more:

1. Why were civil rights supporters disappointed with the supreme court’s 1896 decision in Plessey v. Ferguson? https://brainly.com/question/2306255

2. Which statement describes the majority party’s power when it comes to senate committees? https://brainly.com/question/1017368

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: The Battle of Antietam

Keywords: The Battle of Antietam,  McClellan,  Robert E. Lee, Injuries, Wounded, Virginia, Richmond, Battlefield, America, History, Battle.

The correct answer is “Asia to North America”

The Land Bridge Theory is a theory that defends the possibility of a wide plain that connected Asia and North America. This is supported by evidence of human occupation in Chile by 14,500 years ago, because of this scientists think that humans went from Alaska to South America, spreading across the continent.

Now, the last scientific DNA studies show that the population from the Americas did not originate from Asia Mongolians, in fact, they are a separate and distinct race.

Answer:

For Europeans to produce finished goods they used monopolies to force their colonies to supply them with raw materials

Explanation:

Final answer:

The US government policy towards the Plains Indians during 1835-51 evolved as it sought to manage the 'Indian problem' by moving Native Americans to reservations, encouraging assimilation through land ownership, education, and Christianization. Tensions escalated due to these policies, leading to the Plains Wars and the forced cultural absorption of Native tribes. Eastern reformers began to challenge these policies, advocating for Native American rights within the scope of American expansion.

Explanation:

The period between 1835 and 1851 was significant in the development of US government policy towards the Plains Indians. Initially, the policy was influenced by the Monroe administration's approach of moving Native Americans west, away from expanding white settlements. The practice of removal was established early on under Washington's administration, with events like the Treaty of Greenville in 1795 ceding Ohio lands to the US Government after conflict. As settlers moved westward and disrupted traditional Indian life through activities such as agriculture, ranching, and railroads, tensions rose. This period saw an increase in efforts to confine Plains Indians to reservations, with the aim of assimilating them into white American society, particularly under the pressure of expansion following the Civil War.

The government's approach included promoting individual land ownership, Christian worship, and education for Native American children, which would erode their traditional cultures and ways of life. This intent was further exemplified by the passage of the Indian Intercourse Acts from 1790 to 1834, solidifying federal control over interactions with Indian tribes. However, such policies often resulted in broken promises and disputes that escalated into the subsequent Plains Wars. The Indian Wars marked a tragic chapter in US history, where economic, cultural, and military forces sought to conquer and culturally absorb the Plains Indians.

Over time, the plight of Native Americans garnered attention from eastern reformers, leading to criticism of the government's forceful policies. Some Americans, like Helen Hunt Jackson, sought to have Native American rights recognized and respected, albeit within the context of white America's sovereignty. The federal government's goal of negotiating a few treaties to bind all Native Americans was hindered by the diversity of Plains tribes, which was not fully appreciated or acknowledged.

Executive agreement my fellow fiends. Like if your day is going well!

Final answer:

True, Eleanor Roosevelt was a true advocate for gender and racial equality during her tenure as the First Lady of the United States. She actively championed civil rights, supported women's journalism, and was influential in advancing human rights on a global scale after World War II. Her contributions are remembered as groundbreaking for the role of the First Lady.

Explanation:

True, as First Lady of the United States, Eleanor Roosevelt was indeed an advocate for gender and racial equality. She used her influential position to champion civil rights by taking a firm stand against racial discrimination, such as when she flew with an African American pilot to counteract racism in the military. Moreover, her advocacy extended to women's rights, where she created more opportunities for women in journalism by choosing to only admit female reporters to her press conferences.

Eleanor Roosevelt was not only a supportive political partner to her husband, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, but also a significant political figure in her own right. She worked tirelessly for the end of discrimination and poverty, and after World War II, she became an active diplomat internationally.

She inspired the writing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and held a six-day-a-week newspaper column titled My Day, amplifying her influence on national and international stages. Eleanor Roosevelt’s involvement in civil rights and efforts to push the Army Nurse Corps to allow Black women exemplify her dedication to leveling the playing field for all.

Answer:

Gradually, the investment required by the war and the lack of resources were devastating the South. Hoping for European support in the war, the Confederate authorities, instead of exporting cotton and enjoying profits, canceled sales, thinking that they could force, for example, the entry of England at his side against the Union troops. But the English had a year of stock of the product and the French refused to help the southerners without English support. Besides, Lincoln prohibited the entry and exit of southern states, making it difficult for goods to arrive. Those goods were needed for both the population of the South and the troops.

Looking at each other without weapons, clothes, and on the verge of starvation, the departure from military service was intense (about one-third of the southern troops left the battlefield in 1863). Some Southern masters gathered slaves to form their army.

Asia was rich with spices and gold, two commodities in high demand. They want a faster path to Asia because the current route was cumbersome and risky.

The Suez route travels via many locations on its path from Asia to Europe, including the Strait of Gibraltar, Bab el-Mandab, the Suez Canal, and the Strait of Malacca.

Arab's traders had long dominated the trade routes to Africa and Asia, European traders were forced to buy from Italian traders at exorbitant prices. They wanted to trade directly with Africa and Asia, thus they needed to find a new sea route.

Understanding the Social Importance of Scientific Discovery: Science and Its Times. Vasco da Gama establishes the first maritime route for trade between Europe and India and Asia.

Thus, Asia was rich with spices and gold, two commodities in high demand.

For more details about sea route to Asia, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14723056

#SPJ6

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Industrialization spread to other countries as they sought to emulate Britain's economic success and capitalize on the opportunities for increased power and wealth that industrialization offered, employing new sources of power and technological innovations.

Industrialization spread to other countries mainly because other nations wanted to replicate the economic success that Britain had achieved through its industrial revolution. This diffusion of industrial processes was influenced by several factors including the need for nations to produce goods cheaply, seek new markets for their products, and acquire inexpensive sources of raw materials. Great Britain aimed to maintain its competitive edge through measures such as banning the emigration of skilled workers and took advantage of its advanced banking system, political stability, and natural resources to invest in production. However, as Britain, France, Belgium, Germany, and the United States embarked on the Second Industrial Revolution, other nations followed suit, recognizing the economic power and wealth that industrialization could bring. These countries began developing their own industries, creating a demand for new sources of power, such as electricity and the internal combustion engine, as well as improvements in transportation and communication.

Answer:

ensure that peole could use the misssipi river

Explanation:

Answer:

Option D.

Explanation:

Sectionalism , is the correct answer.

The term Sectionalism is used to describe the loyalty or assistance of a special area or division of the country, preferably a nation as a whole. In the sectional issue, slavery can be taken as an example, which divided the United States into two parts known as the North and the South to the degree that it commenced to the Civil War in America, for the reason that while the northerners opposed slavery the southerners supported it.

Answer:

the answer is Napoleon I don't know is this from usatestprep tho

Independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary would most have likely resulted in the collapse of the empire. Therefore, the option A holds true.

At the near end of the nineteenth century and until the beginning of the twentieth century, the European politics was instable, as the entire European Empire in the west was facing multiple series of conflicts, one of which was the independence of Austria-Hungary.

Austria-Hungary was made up of small parts of different minorities collectively living as a society. If each of these groups had opted for their independence, it would have led to the collapse of the European Empire, and another conflict in the society.

Therefore, the option A holds true regarding the significance of the independence of Austria-Hungary.

Learn more about the independence of Austria-Hungary here:

https://brainly.com/question/3216632

#SPJ5

Independence for Austria-Hungary's ethnic groups would likely collapse the empire, not ensure German takeover, end nationalist movements, or immediately form strong alliances.

Independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary would most likely result in the collapse of the empire. This is because Austria-Hungary was a multi-ethnic state comprising various nationalities such as Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, Romanians, Poles, Ukrainians, and others.

These groups had longstanding grievances and aspirations for self-determination. Granting independence would trigger a domino effect as other ethnic groups would seek the same, leading to the dissolution of the empire.

The collapse of Austria-Hungary would not necessarily result in the Germans taking over the empire, as other powers might seek to influence or control the newly independent states.

Additionally, the end of nationalist movements would be unlikely as the granting of independence would likely embolden nationalist sentiments, leading to further demands for autonomy or sovereignty.

The formation of a strong alliance is also improbable immediately following the dissolution of Austria-Hungary, as the region would likely be characterized by instability and power struggles as newly independent states establish their identities and borders.

Overall, independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary would most likely lead to the collapse of the empire and the subsequent emergence of numerous independent states in Central and Eastern Europe.

Complete question ;

Independence for the diverse ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary were most likely to result in:

A. Formation of independent nation-states

B. Continued conflict and instability

C. A stronger Austro-Hungarian Empire

D. Peaceful coexistence within the empire

E. Greater influence from neighboring countries

through-composed is the form (no repeating sections), with some use of imitation.

Answers should resemble, but not limited to the following: Although the Teller Amendment had stated that the United States had no intention of taking over Cuba, the Platt Amendment limited Cuba’s right to make treaties with other nations, required Cuba to sell or lease land to the United States for naval stations, and authorized the U.S. intervention in Cuban affairs. Cuban leaders disliked the Platt Amendment. Given no choice, however, Cubans reluctantly accepted it.

The outcome of the Korean War might have been quite different had the communists lost the Chinese Civil War. A Nationalist victory leading to the non-communist control of mainland China could have weakened support for North Korea and changed U.S. military strategies in the region.

If the communists had lost the Chinese Civil War, later events in Korea might have been significantly different. Without a communist victory in China, the geopolitical landscape of East Asia would have changed, potentially affecting the dynamics of the Korean War. The People's Republic of China (PRC), led by Mao Zedong, was a crucial ally to North Korea during the Korean War. Had the nationalists under Chiang Kai-Shek retained control over mainland China, they likely would not have supported North Korea in the same manner.

This could have led to a less confident North Korean invasion or possibly deterred it altogether, altering the course of the conflict. In contrast, Chiang's Republic of China (ROC), based in Taiwan, was allied with the United States. If ROC controlled the mainland, the U.S. might have had a stronger regional ally, potentially discouraging Soviet and North Korean aggression. Additionally, the United States under General Douglas MacArthur's advisement might not have considered expanding military operations into China during the Korean War, considering such expansion could have led to a broader conflict with the Soviet Union, which was the biggest fear amid the Cold War tensions.