Answer: (B) hostile prejudice
Explanation:
Hostile prejudice is known to be a show of intense dislike and detest for someone or group of individuals which is unjust and unfavorable. It happens due to untrue and negative belief about a group of people which thereby result in unfair treatment and discrimination to all the members of the group. Thus, it is targeted towards people as a result of race, gender, religion and so on.
Benevolent prejudice is the term used to describe attitudes or views that, although outwardly benign or well-intentioned, nevertheless contain prejudiced assessments about a specific group of individuals.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.In this instance, prejudice that may be described as charitable is evident if one thinks that everyone receiving SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) benefits is naturally lazy and undeserving of government help.
Even though it's presented as an issue of productivity or self-sufficiency, it still entails making unfavorable assumptions about people based only on whether or not they get government aid.
Learn more on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program here: https://brainly.com/question/1264710
#SPJ3
When Joe did really well on his first sales presentation, he said it was because he worked hard on it. When he did poorly on his second sales presentation, he said it was because the computer and projector were not working properly. Joe’s explanations about his two sales presentations reveal a
Answer:
Self serving bias
Explanation:
Self serving biases are explanitons that people form when a situation has an unfavorable outcome. Instead of blaming themselves, individuals will find an external factor to blame for their failures, in this case the external factor is the computer/projector, while in reality it is joe who is to blame for his short comings.
___________ represents the degree to which members of the society accept a hierarchical or unequal distribution of power in organizations and society and reflects on the relationship between superiors and subordinates.
Answer: Power distance
Explanation:
Power distance is known to be how members of a particular society or organisation believe that power is not equally and evenly shared in the society and among colleagues and subordinate within an organisation. Power distance exist in societies or organisations where resources are available to limited set of people who are in high class and information is hidden from the lower class of people or lower rank staffs.
The President of the United States and the leader of a bordering foreign nation agreed that each should appoint three members to a special joint commission to deal with a wildlife problem. The President of the United States, acting in concert with the foreign leader, named the joint commission as a permanent enforcement agency for the regulations that were adopted by both nations. Although the President received prior congressional authorization to enter into this agreement, the Senate did not ratify the agreement by a two-thirds vote. The President then entered into an executive agreement with the foreign leader whereby the joint commission was granted adjudicative as well as enforcement powers with respect to a particular issue. Is the executive agreement by the President valid?
Answer:
Yes, the executive agreement by the President is valid
Explanation:
An executive agreement is an agreement between the United States (made by the current president) and a foreign government that has the same force as treaties but that is less formal, does not necessarily bind the president's successor and does not need to be ratified by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate in order to become valid like treaties require.
This presidential power is not specifically stated in the U.S. Constitution, however, the president is authorized to have it as one of their powers in the area of foreign affairs. Therefore, the executive agreement that the President made with the foreign leader is completely valid.
A plaintiff sued a defendant for defamation, asserting in her complaint that the defendant had called the plaintiff a thief in front of a number of business associates. The plaintiff calls two witnesses to the stand, both of whom testify that they heard the defendant refer to the plaintiff as a thief in front of the business associates. The plaintiff does not take the stand herself. The defendant pleads truth of the statement as an affirmative defense and calls a witness to the stand. The defense witness is prepared to testify that he was a co-worker of the plaintiff when the plaintiff supplemented her income by tending bar three nights a week. The witness will testify that he saw the plaintiff take a $20 bill from the tavern's cash register and secrete the money in her pocket. The plaintiff's attorney objects.May the defense witness's testimony be allowed?A Yes, as substantive evidence that the plaintiff is, in fact, a thief.B Yes, because theft is a crime indicating dishonesty.C No, because specific bad acts may not be used to show bad character.D No, because the plaintiff never took the stand.
Answer:
The answer is A: "Yes, as substantive evidence that the plaintiff is, in fact, a thief"
No, because specific bad acts may not be used to show bad character. This quote illustrates how gender stereotypes can lead to incorrect assumptions about a person's abilities and goals. The option (C) is correct.
Under the rules of evidence, allowing testimony about specific bad acts to show a person's character is generally not admissible. In this case, the defense witness's testimony concerning a specific incident where the plaintiff allegedly stole $20 would be considered as attempting to show the plaintiff's character rather than the truth of the defamation claim.
This situation highlights the importance of following legal rules and standards in the admission of evidence during a trial to ensure fairness and uphold the principles of justice.
Lora lives next door to her childhood home and has become the caregiver for her mother, a frail elderly woman with major neurocognitive disorder and several physical weaknesses. Which of the following is NOT likely true of this case? (A) Lora's siblings appreciate what she is doing.(B) Public agencies will not be available to assist Lora unless there is an extreme issue.(C) Lora will need support and breaks if she is to do her role well. (D)Lora is most likely the caregiver because she has the training and personality to do the job better than others in the family.
Answer: the correct answer is (D) Lora is most likely the caregiver because she has the training and personality to do the job better than others in the family.
Considering societal norms and public services in the United States, it is most likely untrue that public assistance for caregiving is exclusively available for extreme issues. There are public organizations and services that offer various support to caregivers.
Explanation:The subject question pertains to Lora caring for her elderly mother, and which of the provided choices is likely untrue. Given the cultural context, societal trends, and common challenges related to elderly care in the United States, the option (B) 'Public agencies will not be available to assist Lora unless there is an extreme issue.' seems least likely to be true.
Public organizations and service programs are often accessible to provide varying degrees of support to caregivers, including respite care, counseling, training, or resources for managing care. While availability and extent of services can differ based on location, it is generally untrue to say public assistance is only available during extreme issues.
Option (A) about the siblings' sentiment is subjective and can differ case by case. Option (C) recognizes the physical and emotional toll that caregiving can cause, hence the need for support and breaks. Option (D) indicates that Lora may not necessarily have special training or the right personality for caregiving, but she might have taken up the role due to proximity or circumstances
Learn more about Caregiving here:https://brainly.com/question/33560136
#SPJ12
Okay, your recital is next Saturday night, Candy reminded her piano student. "You're doing great but for the next couple of days, I want you to practice by starting with the middle third of the piece until you've got it down perfectly." As a piano teacher, Candy is trying to help her student counteract which of the following memory tendencies?
(A) immagination inflation
(B) source confusion
(C) proactive interference
(D) the serial position effect
Answer: the correct answer is D the serial position effect.
Explanation:
The serial position effect is the tendency that we have to remember the last items in a sequence best and the middle items worst.
What margin is required to override a presidential veto
Answer:
2/3
Explanation:
It will never be split %50-50
A two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required to override a presidential veto.
When the President vetoes a bill, it returns to Congress with the President’s objections. To override the veto, both chambers of Congress must pass the bill again with a two-thirds majority vote. This high threshold ensures that only legislation with substantial bipartisan support can become law despite presidential opposition.
The requirement reflects the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches, providing a mechanism for Congress to assert its legislative authority while still requiring broad consensus to counteract a presidential veto. If the two-thirds majority is not achieved in either chamber, the veto stands, and the bill does not become law.
Mrs. Markie, a first-grade teacher, believes that, from the beginning, children should be exposed to text in its complete form so that they can appreciate the communicative function of written language. Mrs. Markie takes a __________ approach to teaching reading.
Answer:
The correct answer is the Whole language.
Explanation:
The whole language approach was created to help young learners (especially children) to use strategies in reading and to be aware that language has parts that come together to get meaningful learning. So, Mrs. Markie is using this approach with the first-graders students.
Nine-year-old Jonathan struggles with reading and has a slight stuttering problem. Some of his classmates are critical and make fun of his stuttering. This has caused Jonathan to feel embarrassed and to refuse to read aloud in class. He tells his parents that he cannot read and will not try. According to Erikson, if Jonathan does not solve his psychosocial conflict of stage four, he will view himself as:
Answer:
"Inferior" the not really more to it. hope this helps
A _____ is a way of expressing the relationship of a number, quantity, substance, or degree between two components
Answer:
A ratio is a way of expressing the relationship of a number, quantity, substance, or degree between two components.
A Ratio is an approach to communicating the relationship of a number, amount, substance, or degree between two parts. Under the name of extent comes what is consistent and brought together and separable just into more modest detachable, for example, matter, mass, energy, fluid, material all instances of non-aggregate things.
What is a Quantity?Quantity or sum is a property that can exist as a huge number or greatness, which delineate irregularity and progression.
Quantity is among the essential classes of things alongside quality, substance, change, and connection. A few amounts are such by their internal nature (as number), while others capability as states (properties, aspects, credits) of things like weighty and light, long and short, wide and limited, little and extraordinary, or much and little.
Under the name of large number comes what is broken and discrete and separable eventually into indivisibles, for example, armed force, armada, herd, government, organization, party, individuals, wreck (military), tune, group, and number; all which are instances of aggregate things.
Therefore Alongside dissecting its inclination and order, the issues of quantity include such firmly related points as dimensionality, balance, extent etc.
Learn more about Quantity here:
brainly.com/question/12986460
#SPJ2
DeWayne has decided to seek psychotherapy for some personal difficulties he has been having. While on the telephone with one possible clinician, he asks her to describe the kind of treatment approach that she uses with clients. "I don't limit myself to a single theory or approach," the therapist answers. "Instead I operate in a(n) ______________ fashion, integrating various treatment approaches based on the specific needs of each client."a. eclectic b. supra-theoreticalc. atheoreticald. Gestalt
A). eclectic
Explanation:"Instead I operate in a(n) eclectic fashion, integrating various treatment approaches based on the specific needs of each client."
The reason why answer choice "A). eclectic" would be the correct answer because the word "eclectic" best describes the amount of treatments that the therapist uses.
"Eclectic" means to get something from many different resources.
This means that the therapist is eclectic, due to the fact that the therapist said that she doesn't limit herself to one theory or approach. She says that she operates in an "eclectic fashion," meaning that she operates in an "open-minded" fashion, allowing herself to try new treatments and theories on patients. This allows her to have a wide variety of treatments for patients that have different needs of treatment.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!Your question asks what answer choice best fits in the blank.
Answer: a). eclecticAnswer choice "A). eclectic" is the correct answer because this is specifically what the therapist is doing.
The therapist applies "eclectic" in her work to help out many patients. The therapists gets her treatments from "many sources" in order to help different patients with their different needs.
The therapists does this in order to ensure that the patient is satisfied with their treatment. Not all treatments work with all patients, therapists should find other treatment to meet patients needs.
I hope this helps!Best regards,MasterInvestorThe use of synthetic marijuana is legal in the state of georgia. TRUE OR FALSE
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Who is responsible for explaining proper waste disposal procedures to passengers on a boat?
Answer: The Boat Operator.
Explanation:
Which of the following suits would not fall within the United States Supreme Court's original jurisdiction under Article III, Section 2?A A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.B A suit seeking to protect a state's timber from allegedly illegal cutting by residents of another state.C A suit seeking to enjoin enforcement of an allegedly unconstitutional executive order that will greatly limit the state's authority to make policy decisions regarding admission to state universities.D A suit by the United States Government seeking to enjoin state construction of a bridge over a navigable waterway.
Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
Adam is upset that his twin brother Ryan has two pieces of pie while he only has one. His Mom rightly states that it’s the same amount of pie it’s just that Ryan’s piece fell apart into two pieces as it was transferred onto the plate. Still not satisfied, Adam begins to throw a temper tantrum. In a moment of desperation, Adam’s Mom cuts his piece in half saying: “There, Adam, now you have two pieces!” This worked. Adam is now happy. What Piagetian Stage is Adam in?
Answer:
preoperational
Explanation:
Adam’s Mom cuts his piece in half saying: “There, Adam, now you have two pieces!” This worked. Adam is now happy. Adam is in the preoperational Piagetian Stage. This period takes place in children from 2 to 7. During this stage, children cannot manipulate information with their developing mental abilities. This example illustrates that Adam does not understand conservation yet.
Adam is in the Preoperational Stage of Cognitive Development, as described by Piaget, which is evident from his inability to understand the concept of conservation and his focus on the number of pieces instead of the total quantity of pie.
Explanation:Adam, in the scenario presented, is in the Preoperational Stage of Cognitive Development according to Jean Piaget. This stage encompasses children ages 2 to 7 and is characterized by an increase in symbolic thinking, enabling children to engage in pretend play and develop language skills. However, children in this stage struggle with understanding the concept of conservation — the idea that quantity doesn't change with physical transformation if nothing is removed or added. Adam's happiness upon his single piece of pie being cut into two, despite the quantity of pie remaining the same, illustrates his operational focus on one dimension (number of pieces) while missing the broader concept of overall quantity. This developmental phase highlights children's focus on appearance and their challenges in considering multiple aspects of a situation simultaneously.
When Ramona encountered a new cultural environment she was faced with two fundamental questions: ''Should I seek positive relations with the dominant society?'' and ''Is my original culture of value to me, and should I try to maintain it?'' Which of the following is NOT one of the four possible patterns of acculturation that Ramona might adopt?A. integration B. assimilation C. acceptance D. separation
Answer:
C. acceptance
Answer:
B. assimilation
Explanation:
When Ramona encountered a new cultural environment she was faced with two fundamental questions: ''Should I seek positive relations with the dominant society?'' and ''Is my original culture of value to me, and should I try to maintain it?''. Assimilation is NOT one of the four possible patterns of acculturation that Ramona might adopt.
Environmental law is a system of laws that encompass all of the environmental protections that originate from all the sources listed below except: (A) United States constitution and state constitutions regulations published by Federal
(B) State and local agencies
(C) Justice of the Peace rulings
(D) Presidential executive orders the common law
The correct answer is C) justice of the peace rulings.
Environmental law is a system of laws that encompass all of the environmental protections that originate from all the sources listed below except "justice of the peace rulings."
In the United States, the justice of the peace rulings sits in the lowest of the state courts to hear minor issues, civil matters and misdemeanors. They also officiate weddings, issue arrest warrants or deal with minor traffic issues.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the agency in the United States dedicated to the protection and conservation of the environment and the health of the citizens. EPA procures that the environmental laws are enforced correctly and that the country can have clean air, water, and land.
A Law Enforcement Officer may require an operator to submit to which of the following?
A, Breath and field sobriety tests
B, An on-water operator skill test
C, A VHF Marine Radio Exam
D, A rental safety checklist
Answer:
A. Breath and field sobriety tests.
Explanation:
A field sobriety test is a test implemented by police authorities in the case of suspicion of a person having driven after drinking alcohol or doing drugs. The police officer gives the driver the test once he/she has has stopped the person, so as to define if the person represents a danger on the road.
If the person does represent a danger, is arrested. After this, breath and blood tests are performed on the individual in order to elucidate the presence of alcohol or drus in his/her organism.
The In Focus box on gender differences in responding to stress presents Shelley Taylor's idea that women respond to stress with a different behavioral pattern than men. According to Taylor, which hormone might be partly responsible for women's behavioral responses to stress?
Answer:
oxytocin
Explanation:
The In Focus box on gender differences in responding to stress presents Shelley Taylor's idea that women respond to stress with a different behavioral pattern than men. According to Taylor, the hormone which might be partly responsible for women's behavioral responses to stress is oxytocin. Women respond to stress by a pattern that is called "tend-and-befriend" instead of the "fight-or-flight" pattern.
A backgammon player was upset after losing a match against the club champion. Rushing out of the club, he inadvertently grabbed the champion's board, which looked very much like his own but which was much more expensive. The player left the backgammon board in the trunk of his car, as was his usual practice. During the night, the car was stolen and along with it, the champion's expensive backgammon board.In an action by the champion against the player to recover the value of the backgammon board, is the champion likely to recover?A Yes, because when the player took the backgammon board he committed a trespass to the champion's chattel.B Yes, because when the backgammon board was stolen along with the car, the player became liable for conversion of the champion's chattel.C No, because the player believed in good faith that the board was his when he took it from the backgammon club.D No, because the backgammon board was lost through no fault of the player's.
Answer: the correct answer is B. Yes, because when the backgammon board was stolen along with the car, the player became liable for conversion of the champion's chattel
Explanation:
Conversion consists of (i) an act by defendant interfering with plaintiff's right of possession in the chattel (ii) intent to perform the act bringing about the interference with plaintiff's right of possession (iii) causation and (iv) damages. Therefore, the player was guilty of conversion.
The champion is unlikely to recover the value of the backgammon board from the player, given the circumstances of a good faith mistake and the unintended theft of the board. Legal concepts such as trespass to chattel and conversion have specific requirements that do not seem to apply in this situation.
In the scenario where the backgammon player took the champion's board by mistake and then had it stolen from his car, the issue at hand is whether the champion could recover the value of the board from the player. This legal question revolves around the concepts of trespass to chattel and conversion. Trespass to chattel is an intentional interference with the possession of personal property of another without consent, while conversion is a wrongful exercise of dominion and control over the personal property of another in a manner inconsistent with the owner's rights.
Option C states, "No, because the player believed in good faith that the board was his when he took it from the backgammon club." This reflects the defense of mistake which, in certain cases, can be a valid defense against the claim of trespass to chattels, since the player did not intentionally interfere with the champion's property rights.
However, the inevitability of the car being stolen and the backgammon board with it does not automatically impose liability on the player for conversion of chattel. For conversion to occur, there must be an intentional act that deprives the owner of possession or use of their property. Since the player did not intend to deprive the champion of their property, and the theft of the car was an unforeseen event outside the player's control, it is less likely for a claim for conversion to succeed.
Thus, based on the given facts, the answer would likely be "No," either due to the player's good faith mistake (Option C) or because the loss occurred without the player's fault (Option D).
What was the most likely reason that someone would perform an exorcism?a. to relieve fluid pressure on the brainb. to look into the brain to see what was wrongc. to release evil spiritsd. to restore balance to the body's humors
Answer: C. to release evil spirits.
Explanation:
An exorcism is a practice or ritual that tries to expel a demon that's possessing a person. The practice of exorcising is practiced in different religions around the world, such as the Catholic religion. To perform the exorcism, the priest or religious leader follows a series of rituals, such as the reading of sacred writings or the use of sacred objects, in order to expel or drive away the devil.
I hope this information can help you.
After Little Albert acquired a conditioned fear of rats, Watson wanted to see how he would react to a white rabbit, cotton wool, and a Santa Claus mask. He was studying whether or not ________ had occurred.
Answer:
fear
Explanation:
Little Albert has a fear of rats, so fear goes in the blank.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: He was studying whether or not ___ had occurred, would be: stimulus generalization.
Explanation:
The experiment that John B. Watson carried out on Little Albert, in the 1920´s, had the purpose of showing the process of classical conditioning of responses to stimulus. After managing to produce a reaction of fear in Little Albert, the child who was subjected to Watson´s experimentation, the researcher further wanted to see if the conditioned response to the rats would extend to other stimuli. As such, he used animals that were similar to the rat, and tried to ascertain the responses by the child. This use of animals similar to the one that caused the initial response, is called stimulus generalization.
The _________________ parenting style includes parental warmth, proactive teaching, calm discussion during disciplinary episodes, and interest and involvement in their children and peers' activities.
Answer:
authoritative
Explanation:
The authoritative parenting style includes parental warmth, proactive teaching, calm discussion during disciplinary episodes, and interest and involvement in their children and peers' activities.
The authoritative parenting style involves a balanced approach of warmth and consistent limits, often leading to higher self-esteem, social skills, and academic success in children compared to other parenting styles.
The authoritative parenting style includes parental warmth, proactive teaching, calm discussion during disciplinary episodes, and interest and involvement in their children and peers' activities. This refers to a manner of parenting where parents give children reasonable demands and consistent limits, express warmth and affection, and listen to the child's point of view.
By using this approach, parents support their children's autonomy within reasonable bounds and encourage positive self-concept and socioemotional growth. The authoritative parenting style is linked to various positive outcomes for children, including higher self-esteem, social skills, and often higher academic achievement. It differs from authoritarian parenting, which is stricter and less warm, permissive parenting, which is more lax and indulgent, and uninvolved parenting, which is characterized by a lack of responsiveness to the child's needs.
The Republic of Monaslu has a direct restriction on the quantity of cheese that may be imported into the country. Which of the following instruments of trade policy is being used by the Republic of Monaslu?
(A) tariff rate quota
(B) export ban
(C) voluntary import restraint
(D) import quota
(E) quota rent
Answer: (D) import quota
Explanation:
Import quota is known to be a form of trade restriction in which the government of a particular country limit the quantity of imported goods and services from other countries. The government imposes import quota in order to keep local industries safe from competing with foreign industries and also encourage the production of local goods and services. Thus, it is used as a means of protection.
Miles is studying visual memory function. He has recruited research participants from introductory psychology students. He shows a randomly selected one-third of the participants emotionally upsetting photos, shows another one-third very happy photos, and shows the last one-third neutral photos. He then tests visual memory and compares the scores of the groups. What design is Miles using?
Answer:
Between-subjects
Explanation:
Your goal this semester to earn a 98% in your psychology course. The library, your textbooks, and your desk are all examples of _______. Question 11 options: 1) self-regulation 2) self-control 3) means 4) deliberation
Answer:
The correct answer is 3. Your goal this semester to earn a 98% in your psychology course. The library, your textbooks, and your desk are all examples of means.
Explanation:
A means is a specific tool that helps people achieve specific and specific objectives. For example, a means of communication helps people communicate with each other.
In this case, the library, textbooks and the desk are means to pass the subject with the desired grade.
In aiming to earn a 98% in a psychology course, a student's library, textbooks, and desk are examples of their 'means'. These are resources or tools utilized to achieve the target—a crucial aspect of practicing self-regulation but are not representations of self-control or deliberation.
Explanation:Your goal this semester to earn a 98% in your psychology course. The library, your textbooks, and your desk are all examples of your means. Means refer to the resources or tools you have available to achieve an objective. In this case, the library, textbooks, and your desk are the means you are using to achieve your goal of a 98% grade in your psychology course.
While all options provided deal with personal growth, the library and textbooks represent external means, thus supporting your self-regulation, which encompasses strategies to direct one's activities towards the achievement of objectives. Meanwhile, self-control is your ability to manage your actions, feelings, and emotions to avoid distractions and remain focused on your goal, and deliberation is involved in the decision-making process of how best to use your means to accomplish your goal.
By regularly revisiting these resources and staying aware of and maintaining focus on your performance, you engage in a form of metacognition—the process of thinking about thinking, which is a critical part of self-regulation.
Learn more about Self-regulation here:https://brainly.com/question/13164359
#SPJ3
Which of the following is the best definition of a motivational appeal? a. a message designed to induce fear in, or increase the anxiety of, a receiver b. an inspirational message designed to pull at the receiver’s heartstrings c. an appeal designed to elicit sympathy or guilt in a receiver d. an external inducement to increase a receiver’s drive to do something
Answer:
I believe it's A. a message designed to induce fear, or increase the anxiety of, a receiver
Among all the given definitions, the one that is the best definition of a motivational appeal is “an external motivational boost to increase a receiver's drive to action.” Hence, Option D is correct.
What is a motivational appeal?A general definition of a motivational appeal is an external incentive, frequently of an emotional character, intended to improve a person's motivation to adopt a certain course of action.
Motivating arguments encourage listeners to take action in the direction of an objective in order to fulfil unfulfilled needs or aspirations. In contrast to persuasion, motivation entails applying pressure, stimulus, or influence to effect change.
Motivating the audience to embrace the viewpoint, be persuaded to change their conduct, or to think about their reasons is motivation, which is the process of persuasion.
Therefore, Option D is correct.
Learn more about motivational appeal from here:
https://brainly.com/question/12974442
#SPJ6
Which agency is responsible for ensuring the safety of the Secretary of State and other U.S. diplomats when they travel to foreign countries?
Law enforcement officials in the host country
The National Security Agency
The Bureau of Diplomatic Security
The U.S. Secret Service and FBI joint task force
Answer:
Law enforcement officials in the host country
Explanation:
Law enforcement officials in the host country is responsible for ensuring the safety of the Secretary of State and other U.S. diplomats when they travel to foreign countries.
Answer:
The Bureau of Diplomatic Security
Explanation:
The Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the law enforcement and security department of the State Department, has the task of ensuring security in the conduct of external relations. To achieve this, special Diplomatic Security Service agents are deployed to embassies around the world as Security Service Directors and a group of professionals consisting of engineers and technicians, post offices, investigators, Marines, local guards and security specialists. . The function of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security is to ensure the security of the Secretary of State and other US diplomats when traveling to foreign countries.
Rachel, a fifty-five-year-old member of a racial minority with a disability, believes that she is a victim of employment discrimination. Potentially the most widespread form of discrimination is based on
A. disability.
B. gender.
C. age.
D. race.
Answer:
Option A.
Explanation:
Age, is the right answer.
Employment discrimination is one of the many forms of discrimination with its basis on age, gender, religion, race and physical or mental disability etc. Discrimination can be expected and include different treatment of a group or be unintended, yet formulate different influence for a group. In the case of Rachel, who is a woman of 55 years with a disability, it is the matter of her age that she is not getting a job.
Mary was adamant that her sorority's practice of hazing should be stopped. Though this attitude was considered __________ in her sorority at the time, it caused her sorority sisters to reconsider the morality of their hazing practice, move forward in changing with the times, and end all hazing activities.
Answer:
Mary was adamant that her sorority's practice of hazing should be stopped. Though this attitude was considered a tradition in her sorority at the time, it caused her sorority sisters to reconsider the morality of their hazing practice, move forward in changing with the times, and end all hazing activities.
Explanation:
Hazing is considered a university tradition, especially among the sororities, which marks its beginning as a freshman at the beginning of his college experience.
However, this tradition generates controversial opinions. There are those who believe that this is a form of efficient interaction between the students and those who see the prank call with bad eyes thanks to the recurring abuses during the supposed play.
Mary has seen this tradition become an abuse in her brotherhood. For this reason, she decides to talk to the members of her fellowship and make them acknowledge the immorality and cruelty of the prank call that was being used. Mary believes that it is at the right time for the fellowship to abandon tradition, move forward with the times, and end all trotting activities.
Final answer:
Mary's opposition to hazing practices in her sorority, initially deemed unconventional, inspired her peers to reassess and eventually eliminate such rituals, showcasing the influence of individual ethics on group conduct.
Mary's attitude was considered "unpopular" in her sorority at the time.
Explanation:
Mary was adamant that her sorority's practice of hazing should be stopped. Though this attitude was considered unconventional in her sorority at the time, it caused her sorority sisters to reconsider the morality of their hazing practice, move forward in changing with the times, and end all hazing activities.
Mary's stance against hazing, once seen as contrarian, served as a catalyst for reflection on ethical standards within the group, demonstrating the potential impact one individual's convictions can have on a collective's behavior and traditions.