In order to estimate the proportion of students that text while driving, a school administrator selects a simple random sample of students from a list of all students at the school who have parking permits. The students are called to the office, one at a time. The administrator asks each student, “Do you text while driving, even though you are not supposed to?” Based on the survey, the administrator estimates that only 2% of students with parking passes text while driving. What potential bias is present in the design of this survey and what is the likely direction of the bias?

Answer:

55%

Step-by-step explanation:

You could first find

10% of 1500=150

50%=750

25%=525

5%=75

750+75=825

The answer is 55% are female

The percentage of the audience that are female at the concert is 55%. This is calculated by dividing the number of females (825) by the total audience number (1500), and then multiplying that result by 100.

To calculate the percentage of women in the audience, we need to divide the number of women by the total number of people in the audience, then multiply by 100 to convert the decimal into a percentage.

Thus, the calculation would be as follows:

(825 / 1500) * 100 = 55%

So, the percentage of the audience that are female is 55%.

https://brainly.com/question/32197511

#SPJ3

Answer:

(a) P([tex]\bar X[/tex] [tex]\geq[/tex] 76) = 0.2327

(b) P(73 < [tex]\bar X[/tex] < 75) = 0.5035

(c) P([tex]\bar X[/tex] < 74.8) = 0.77035

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the mean of a population is 74 and the standard deviation is 16.

Assuming the data follows normal distribution.

Let [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean

The z-score probability distribution for sample mean is given by;

                         Z = [tex]\frac{\bar X -\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex] ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\mu[/tex] = population mean = 74

            [tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation = 16

            n = sample size

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is away from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value (area) associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X.

(a) Probability that a random sample of size 34 yielding a sample mean of 76 or more is given by = P([tex]\bar X[/tex] [tex]\geq[/tex] 76)

   P([tex]\bar X[/tex] [tex]\geq[/tex] 76) = P( [tex]\frac{\bar X -\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex] [tex]\geq[/tex] [tex]\frac{76-74}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{34} } }[/tex] ) = P(Z [tex]\geq[/tex] 0.73) = 1 - P(Z < 0.73)

                                                 = 1 - 0.7673 = 0.2327

The above probability is calculated by looking at the value of x = 0.73 in the z table which has an area of 0.7673.

(b) Probability that a random sample of size 120 yielding a sample mean of between 73 and 75 is given by = P(73 < [tex]\bar X[/tex] < 75) = P([tex]\bar X[/tex] < 75) - P([tex]\bar X[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] 73)

   P([tex]\bar X[/tex] < 75) = P( [tex]\frac{\bar X -\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex] < [tex]\frac{75-74}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{120} } }[/tex] ) = P(Z < 0.68) = 0.75175

   P([tex]\bar X[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] 73) = P( [tex]\frac{\bar X -\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\frac{73-74}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{120} } }[/tex] ) = P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] -0.68) =1 - P(Z < 0.68)

                                                 = 1 - 0.75175 = 0.24825

Therefore, P(73 < [tex]\bar X[/tex] < 75) = 0.75175 - 0.24825 = 0.5035

The above probability is calculated by looking at the value of x = 0.68 in the z table which has an area of 0.75175.

(c) Probability that a random sample of size 218 yielding a sample mean of less than 74.8 is given by = P([tex]\bar X[/tex] < 74.8)

   P([tex]\bar X[/tex] < 74.8) = P( [tex]\frac{\bar X -\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex] < [tex]\frac{74.8-74}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{218} } }[/tex] ) = P(Z < 0.74) = 0.77035

The above probability is calculated by looking at the value of x = 0.74 in the z table which has an area of 0.77035.

If the conditions for statistical inference for testing a difference in population proportions been met then we can say that  -(E )All conditions for making statistical inference have been met.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can test the claim and the assumptions  about the population proportion  under the following conditions

Thus we can say that by studying the question we can say that the above mentioned condition have been met.Hence

If the conditions for statistical inference for testing a difference in population proportions been met then we can say that  -(E )All conditions for making statistical inference have been met.

The conditions for statistical inference for testing a difference in population proportions have not been met.

In order to test for a difference in population proportions, certain conditions need to be met. Firstly, the condition for independence must be met, which means that random samples need to be selected. Secondly, the distribution of the difference in sample proportions needs to be approximately normal. This is determined by checking whether nO(pC) is greater than or equal to 10 and nO(1-pC) is greater than or equal to 10. In this case, the conditions for statistical inference have not been met because random samples were not selected (option A) and nN(pC) is not greater than or equal to 10 (option C).

The entire peach pie contains 2240 calories.

To find the number of calories in the entire peach pie, we need to multiply the number of calories in each slice by the total number of slices. In this case, there are 8 equal slices in the peach pie, and each slice has 280 calories. Therefore, the total number of calories in the entire peach pie is 8 multiplied by 280, which equals 2240 calories.

https://brainly.com/question/32065521

#SPJ3

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.843-0.653}{\sqrt{0.748(1-0.748)(\frac{1}{300}+\frac{1}{300})}}=5.358[/tex]    

[tex]p_v =2*P(Z>5.358) = 4.2x10^{-8}[/tex]  

Comparing the p value with the significance level given [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] we see that [tex]p_v<\alpha[/tex] so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that we have singificantly differences between the two proportions.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation  

[tex]X_{1}=253[/tex] represent the number with no defects in sample 1

[tex]X_{2}=196[/tex] represent the number with no defects in sample 1

[tex]n_{1}=300[/tex] sample 1

[tex]n_{2}=300[/tex] sample 2

[tex]p_{1}=\frac{253}{300}=0.843[/tex] represent the proportion of number with no defects in sample 1

[tex]p_{2}=\frac{196}{300}=0.653[/tex] represent the proportion of number with no defects in sample 2

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] significance level given

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference in the the two proportions, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} - p_2}=0[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} - p_{2} \neq 0[/tex]  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex]   (1)  

Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{253+196}{300+300}=0.748[/tex]  

z-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.  

Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

[tex]z=\frac{0.843-0.653}{\sqrt{0.748(1-0.748)(\frac{1}{300}+\frac{1}{300})}}=5.358[/tex]    

Statistical decision

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:  

[tex]p_v =2*P(Z>5.358) = 4.2x10^{-8}[/tex]  

Comparing the p value with the significance level given [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] we see that [tex]p_v<\alpha[/tex] so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that we have singificantly differences between the two proportions.  

Answer:

Answer:

The first box plot.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

In a box plot, the lower quartile is the right hand side of the box.  In the first plot, this is 3.

The upper quartile is the left hand side of the box.  In the first plot, this is 8.

The interquartile range is the difference between these two values:

8-3 = 5.

Answer:

20 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

We conclude that the average attention span for teenage boys is less than 5 minutes.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the mean time to distraction for teenage boys working on an independent task was 4 minutes.

Suppose that this mean was based on a random sample of 50 teenage Australian boys and that the sample standard deviation was 1.4 minutes.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = average attention span for teenage boys

SO, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu \geq[/tex] 5 minutes    {means that the average attention span for teenage boys is more than or equal to 5 minutes}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] < 5 minutes    {means that the average attention span for teenage boys is less than 5 minutes}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviation;

                    T.S.  = [tex]\frac{\bar X -\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean attention time span for teenage boys = 4 min

             s = sample standard deviation = 1.4 min

             n = sample of teenage boys = 50

So, the test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{4-5}{\frac{1.4}{\sqrt{50} } }[/tex]  ~  [tex]t_4_9[/tex]

                                     =  -5.051

Now at 0.01 significance level, the t table gives critical value of -2.405 at 49 degree of freedom for left-tailed test. Since our test statistics is less than the critical value of t as -2.405 > -5.051, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the average attention span for teenage boys is less than 5 minutes.

Answer:

E. The entire population is measured in both cases, so the actual difference in means can be computed and a confidence interval should not be used.

Step-by-step explanation:

The entire population of Greek and Egyptian mathematicians was already measured by Amara. She can measure the actual difference in the mean. Therefore, she needn't use a confidence interval. It is mostly common for a researcher to be more interested in the difference between means than in the specific values of the means. The difference in sample means is used to compute the difference in population means.

Amara's sample is a random selection of Greek and Egyptian mathematicians. It is a smaller group drawn from the population that has the characteristics of the entire population. The observations and conclusions made against the sample data are attributed to the population. In this case, the entire position is measured.

A t-test is a type of inferential statistic used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups (Greek and Egyptian mathematicians) which may be related in certain features. It is mostly used when the data sets, like the data set recorded as the outcome from rolling a die 50 times, would follow a normal distribution and may have unknown variances. A t-test is used as a hypothesis testing tool, which allows testing of an assumption applicable to a population. Once the actual difference is known, a confidence interval should not be used.

Answer:

infinite solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

5(- 3x - 2) - (x - 3) = -4(4x + 5) + 13

Ditribute

-15x -10 -x +3 = -16x - 20+13

Combine like term

-16x -7 = -16x -7

Add 16x to each side

-16x+16x -7 = -16x+16x-7

-7 =-7

This is always true so we have infinite solutions.

answers

All real numbers are solutions

step by step

5(−3x−2)−(x−3)=−4(4x+5)+13

Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.

5(−3x−2)−(x−3)=−4(4x+5)+13

5(−3x−2)+−1(x−3)=−4(4x+5)+13(Distribute the Negative Sign)

5(−3x−2)+−1x+(−1)(−3)=−4(4x+5)+13

5(−3x−2)+−x+3=−4(4x+5)+13

(5)(−3x)+(5)(−2)+−x+3=(−4)(4x)+(−4)(5)+13(Distribute)

−15x+−10+−x+3=−16x+−20+13

(−15x+−x)+(−10+3)=(−16x)+(−20+13)(Combine Like Terms)

−16x+−7=−16x+−7

−16x−7=−16x−7

Step 2: Add 16x to both sides.

−16x−7+16x=−16x−7+16x

−7=−7

Step 3: Add 7 to both sides.

−7+7=−7+7

0=0

Answer:

H₀: p = 0.20.

Hₐ: p ≠ 0.20.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is:

The data in Nutrition Study include information on nutrition and health habits of a sample of 315 people. One of the variables is Smoke, indicating whether a person smokes or not (yes or no). Use technology to test whether the data provide evidence that the proportion of smokers is different from 20% given that 43 identify themselves as smokers. Clearly state the null and alternative hypotheses

In this case we need to test whether the proportion of smokers is different from 20%.

A one-proportion z-test can be used to determine the conclusion for this test.

The hypothesis defined as:

H₀: The proportion of smokers is 20%, i.e. p = 0.20.

Hₐ: The proportion of smokers is different from 20%, i.e. p ≠ 0.20.

The information provided is:

n = 315

X = number of people who identified themselves as smokers = 43

Compute the sample proportion of smokers as follows:

[tex]\hat p=\frac{X}{n}=\frac{43}{315}=0.137[/tex]

Compute the test statistic as follows:

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}=\frac{0.137-0.20}{\sqrt{\frac{0.20(1-0.20)}{315}}}=-2.80[/tex]

The test statistic is -2.80.

Compute the p-value as follows:

[tex]p-value=2\times P(Z<-2.80)\\=2\times [1-P(Z<2.80)]\\=2\times [1-0.99744]\\=0.00512[/tex]

*Use a z-table.

The p-value is 0.00512.

The p-value is quite small. So, the null hypothesis will be rejected at any significance level.

Thus, it can be concluded that the  proportion of smokers is different from 20%.

The null hypothesis is that the proportion of smokers is 20% and the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of smokers is not 20%.

The null hypothesis simply means that there's no effect or relationship between the variables while the alternative hypothesis simply states that the prediction of the research has an effect

In this case, the null hypothesis is that the proportion of smokers is 20% and the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of smokers is not 20%.

Learn more about hypothesis on:

https://brainly.com/question/15980493

Answer:

a) X ~ exp ( 10 )

b) E(X) = 0.1 , Var (X) = 0.01

c)  P ( X < 0.07 ) = 0.00698

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution:-

- The spike train, used to study neural activity, the given time in between consecutive spikes (ISI) where the firing rate = 10 neurons per seconds.

- Denote a random variable "X"represent a single interspike interval (ISI) having an exponential distribution.

- Where X follows exponential distribution defined by event rate parameter i.e λ.

                               X ~ Exp ( λ )

- The event rate (λ) is the number of times an event occurs per unit time. Since we are studying a single interspike interval (ISI) - which corresponds to the firing rate. So, event rate (λ) = firing rate = 10 neurons per second. Hence, the distribution is:

                               X ~ Exp ( 10 )

- The expected value E(X) denotes the amount of time in which a single an event occurs; hence, the time taken for a single neuron.

                               E(X) = 1 / λ

                               E(X) = 1 / 10

                               E(X) = 0.1 s per neuron.

- The variance is the variation in the time taken by a single neuron to be emitted. It is defined as:

                               Var (X) = 1 / λ^2

                               Var (X) = 1 / 10^2

                               Var (X) = 0.01 s^2

- The probability that ISI is less than t = 0.07 seconds: P ( X < t = 0.07 s):

- The cumulative distribution function for exponential variate "X" is:

                                P ( X < t ) = 1 - e^(-λ*t)

- Plug the values and the determine:

                                P ( X < 0.07 ) = 1 - e^(-0.1*0.07)

                                                      = 1 - 0.99302

                                                      = 0.00698

Answer:

x=13

Step-by-step explanation: (8x-44)+(8x-44)+(8x-44)=180

24x-132=180

24x=312

312/24

x=13

Showing Proof

8(13)-44=60

60+60+60=180

Therefore the answer is x=13

In the triangle in the given diagram, the value of x is 13

In the diagram, the value of ∠C = (8x -44)°.

To determine the value of x, we will first determine the measure of ∠C.

From the question,

Triangle ABC is equilateral

Recall that, each interior angle of an equilateral triangle equals 60°.

∴ m ∠C = 60°

Since the measure of ∠C = 60°

Then, we can write that

(8x - 44)° = 60°

Now, we will solve the above equation for x

8x° - 44° = 60°

First, add 44° to both sides

8x° - 44° + 44° = 60° + 44°

8x° = 104°

∴ x = 104° ÷ 8°

x = 13

Hence, in the given triangle, the value of x is 13

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/23421311

Answer:

The population of the small community, 5 years into the future, after the initial 20-year period = 4268.

Step-by-step explanation:

t | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20

p | 100 | 200 | 450 | 950 | 2000

The exponential function will look like

p = aeᵏᵗ

where a and k are constants.

Take the natural logarithms of both sides

In p = In aeᵏᵗ

In p = In a + In eᵏᵗ

In p = In a + kt

In p = kt + In a.

We then use linear regression to fit the data of In p against t to obtain k and In a.

t | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20

p | 100 | 200 | 450 | 950 | 2000

In p | 4.605 | 5.298 | 6.109 | 6.856 | 7.601

In p = kt + In a.

y = mx + b

m = k and b = In a

Performing a linear regression analysis on the now-linear relationship between In p and t and also plotting a graph of the variables.

The regression equation obtained is

y = 0.151x + 4.584

The first attached image shows the equations necessary for the estimation of the linear regression parameters.

The second attached image shows the use of regression calculator and the plot of the function In p versus t.

Comparing

y = 0.151x + 4.584

With

In p = kt + In a.

y = In p

k = 0.151

x = t

In a = 4.584

a = 97.905

The exponential function relating p and t,

p = aeᵏᵗ now becomes

p = 97.905 e⁰•¹⁵¹ᵗ

So, to predict the population 5 years into the future, that is 5 years after the 20 year period.

we need p at t=25 years.

0.151 × 25 = 3.775

p(t=25) = 97.905 e³•⁷⁷⁵ = 4268.41 = 4268.

Hope this Helps!!!

To forecast another 5 years, an exponential growth model can be used. The growth rate 'r' can be estimated using linear regression on the natural log of population figures against time, and this rate can be used to compute the predicted population. However, such a model may not account for influences like resource depletion.

To predict the population 5 years into the future, we can use an exponential model and linear regression. The population growth described suggests it follows a sort of exponential process where population counts increase more rapidly as time progresses.

Exponential growth can be modeled using the equation P(t) = P0 * e^(rt), where P(t) is the population at time t, P0 is the initial population, r is the growth rate, and e is the base of natural logarithms. To find 'r', we can plot the natural log of the population against time and apply linear regression. The slope of the regression line estimates the growth rate 'r'. Once we've estimated 'r', we can plug the estimated 'r', the current population P0, and the time (t=25, for 5 years into the future) into the formula to calculate the predicted population.

Though this approach gives an estimate, it's important to note that real-life population dynamics can be influenced by various factors not accounted for in a simple exponential model, such as carrying capacity and resource depletion. Thus, it's more of an optimistic estimate, assuming ideal conditions for continued growth.

https://brainly.com/question/12490064

#SPJ3

Answer:

See explaination

Step-by-step explanation:

public class GaussElim{

private static final double eps = 1e-10; % set epsilon value

public static doublic[] fun(double[][] A,double[] b){

int n=b.length; %calculate length of vector b.

for( int j=0;j<n;j++){

int max=j; %find and swap pivot row.

for (int i=j+1;i<n;i++){

if(Math.abs(A[i][j])>Math.abs(A[max][j])){

max=i;

}

}

double[] t1= A[j]; %swap

A[j]=A[max];

A[max]=t1;

double t= b[j]; %swap

b[j]=b[max];

b[max]=t;

if(Math.abs(A[j][j])<=eps){

throw new ArithmeticException("Matrix is singular."); % if matrix A is a singular matrix then throw error.

}

for(int i=j+1;i<n;i++){

double alpha= A[i][j]/A[j][j];

b[i]=b[i]-alpha*b[j];

for(int k=j;k<n;k++){

A[i][k]=A[i][k]-alpha*A[j][k];

}

}

}

double[] x=new double[n]; % back substitution starts here

for(int i=n-1;i>=0;i--){

double sum=0.0;

for(int j=i+1;j<n;j++){

sum=sum+A[i][j]*x[j];

}

x[i]=(b[i]-sum)/A[i][i];

}

return x;

}

public static void main(String[] args){

int n=3;

double[][] A={{1,2,1},{4,2,0},{-1,5,-3}};

double[] b={5,3,21};

double[] x=fun(A,b);

for(int i=0;i<n;i++){

StdOut.println(x[i]);

}

}

}

Answer:

(2x100,000) 200,000,00

Step-by-step explanation:

200,000

Answer: 2 hundred thousands

Explanation: To determine what the digit 2 means in 7,239,103, if we put 7,239,103 into the place value chart, we can recognize that the digit 2 is in the hundreds column of the thousands period.

So in this problem, 2 refers to 2 hundred thousands.

Place value chart is attached

in the image provided.

Final answer:

To find the probability of selecting two male students from a class with 8 male and 7 female students, we multiply the individual probabilities. Hence, the answer is 4/15.

Explanation:

Probability of getting a male student in the first selection: 8/15

Probability of getting a male student in the second selection given the first is male: 7/14

Probability both selections are male students: (8/15) * (7/14) = 8/30 = 4/15

Answer:

He would need 45,000 for his down payment. He would only have to come up with 9,000.

Step-by-step explanation:

10% times 450,000 is 45,000.

80% times 45,000 is 36,000. 45,000 minus 3600 is 9,000.

Answer:

$9,000

Step-by-step explanation:

10% of 450000

10/100 × 450000

= 45000

He has 80%, needs to arrange for 100-80 = 20% of the down payment

20/100 × 45000 = 9,000

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1) The sample and the population of this study is the friends who replied his email which includes in his contact list. then, the number of the replied to his email are 9 friends.

population: the whole friends include in his contact list.

3) Type I error occurs when one incorrectly rejects the null hypothesis

Here there is possibility of type I error

Answer:

Jelly Bean price per pound = $3.25, Trail Mix price per pound = $1.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Let jb = price per pound of jelly beans

Let tm = price per pound of trail mix

equation 1 -> 6*jb + 2*tm = 22

equation 2 -> 3*jb + 5*tm = 16

simplify equation 1

6*jb + 2tm = 22

2*tm = 22 - 6*jb

divide by 2

tm = 11 - 3*jb

plug this into equation 2

3*jb + 5*tm = 16

3*jb + 5*(11-3*jb) = 16

3*jb + 55 - 15*jb = 16

-12*jb + 55 = 16

-12*jb = 16 - 55

-12*jb = -39

jb = -39/-12

jb = 3.25

then, plug the cost per pound of jelly beans back into the simplified equation 1

tm = 11 - 3*jb

tm = 11 - 3*3.25

tm = 1.25

Answer:

a) (9/2)

b) (9/4)

Step-by-step explanation:

I = ∫¹₀ (x³ - 5x) dx = -(9/4)

a) ∫¹₀ (10x - 2x³) dx = -2 ∫¹₀ (x³ - 5x) dx

∫¹₀ (x³ - 5x) dx = -(9/4) from the given value for I

-2 ∫¹₀ (x³ - 5x) dx = -2 × (-9/4) = (9/2)

b) ∫¹₀ (5x - x³) dx = -1 ∫¹₀ (x³ - 5x) dx

∫¹₀ (x³ - 5x) dx = -(9/4) from the given value for I

-1 ∫¹₀ (x³ - 5x) dx = -1 × (-9/4) = (9/4)

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

a.

[tex]\int\limits_{0}^{1} 10x - 2x^3 \,dx = -2(\int\limits_{0}^{1} x^3 -5x\,dx) = -2*(-9/4) = 9/2[/tex]

b.

[tex]\int\limits_{0}^{1} 5x - x^3 \,dx = -1*(\int\limits_{0}^{1} x^3 -5x\,dx) = -1*(-9/4) = 9/4[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the information given.

[tex]\int\limits_{0}^{1} x^3 - 5x \,dx = -9/4\\[/tex]

Now.

a.

[tex]\int\limits_{0}^{1} 10x - 2x^3 \,dx = -2(\int\limits_{0}^{1} x^3 -5x\,dx) = -2*(-9/4) = 9/2[/tex]

b.

[tex]\int\limits_{0}^{1} 5x - x^3 \,dx = -1*(\int\limits_{0}^{1} x^3 -5x\,dx) = -1*(-9/4) = 9/4[/tex]

Answer:

We accept H₀ we don´t have evidence of differences between the information from the sample and the population mean

Step-by-step explanation:

From data and excel (or any statistics calculator) we get:

X = 249,6 ml         and       s  1,26 ml

Sample mean and sample standard deviation respectively.

Population mean  μ₀  = 250 ml

We have a normal distribution but we dont know the standard deviation of the population. Furthermore we have a two tails test since we are finding if the sample give us evidence of differences ( in both senses ) when we compare them with the amount of water spec ( 250 ml )

Our test hypothesis are: null hypothesis       H₀    X = μ₀

Alternative Hypothesis                                 Hₐ     X ≠ μ₀

We also know that sample size is 8  therefore df  =  8 - 1   df = 7 , with this value and the fact that we are required to test at α = 0,05 ( two tails test)

t = 2,365

Then we evaluate our interval:

X ± t* (s/√n)   ⇒   249,6 ±  2,365 * ( 1,26/√8 )

 249,6 ±  2,365 * (1,26/2,83)  ⇒ 249,6 ±  2,365 *0,45

249,6 ± 1,052

P [ 250,652 ; 248,548]

Then the population mean 250 is inside the interval, therefore we must accept that the bottles have being  fill withing the spec. We accept H₀

Answer:

Because the p-value of 0.4304 is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. We conclude the data provide convincing evidence that the mean amount of water in all the bottles filled that day does not differ from the target value of 250 milliliters.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

257/2 degrees or 128.5 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

radians to degrees is x radians * 180/π

[tex]\frac{257\pi }{360} * \frac{180}{\pi }= \frac{257}{2}[/tex]

it is 257/2 degrees or 128.5 degrees

Answer:

The slope is -1

Step-by-step explanation:

We can find the slope by using

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

   = (-3-5)/(6 - -2)

   = (-3-5)/(6+2)

   = -8/8

  -1

Final answer:

The probability of more than 192 confidence intervals containing the true proportion when constructing 95% confidence intervals across 200 towns, which follows a binomial distribution.

Explanation:

When constructing confidence intervals for a proportion, if we state that we have 95% confidence, this means that if we were to take many samples and build a confidence interval from each sample, we would expect 95% of those intervals to contain the population proportion. In the case with 200 towns, 95% confidence suggests that approximately 190 out of 200 intervals would contain the true population proportion, as 95% of 200 is 190.

To find the probability that more than 192 of these intervals contain the true proportion, we would use the binomial distribution, where each interval has a 0.95 probability of containing the true proportion (success), and we are looking for the sum of the probabilities of 193, 194, ..., 200 successes out of 200 trials.

Answer:

4 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  600

Step-by-step explanation:

As t gets very large, the exponential term goes to zero, and the expression nears the value ...

  P(∞) = 600/(1 +5·0) = 600

The maximum number of squirrels the park can support is modeled as being 600.

Answer:

a) N(A∩B) = 0.9

b) N(A∩B) = 4.9

c) N(A or B) = 4.2

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that A and B each randomly, and independently, choose 3 of 10 objects;

P(A) = P(B) = 3/10 = 0.3

P(A') = P(B') = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7

a) chosen by both;

Probability of being chosen by both;

P(A∩B) = 0.3 × 0.3 = 0.09

Expected Number of objects being chosen by both;

N(A∩B) = P(A∩B) × N(total) = 0.09×10

N(A∩B) = 0.9

b) not chosen by either A or B;

Probability of not being chosen by either A or B;

P(A'∩B') = 0.7 × 0.7 = 0.49

Expected Number of objects being chosen by both;

N(A'∩B') = P(A'∩B') × N(total) = 0.49×10

N(A∩B) = 4.9

c) chosen by exactly one of A and B.

Probability of being chosen by exactly one of A and B

P(A∩B') + P(A'∩B) = 0.3×0.7 + 0.7 × 0.3 = 0.42

Expected Number of objects being chosen by both;

N(A or B) = 0.42 × 10

N(A or B) = 4.2

The expected number of objects chosen by both A and B is 0.9. The expected number of objects not chosen by either A or B is 9.1. The expected number of objects chosen by exactly one of A and B is 4.2.

To find the expected number of objects chosen by both A and B, we can use the multiplication rule. Since A and B each independently choose 3 objects from a set of 10, the probability of choosing a specific object is 3/10 for both A and B. Therefore, the expected number of objects chosen by both A and B is (3/10)(3/10)(10) = 0.9.

To find the expected number of objects not chosen by either A or B, we can subtract the expected number of objects chosen by both A and B from the total number of objects. So, the expected number of objects not chosen by either A or B is 10 - 0.9 = 9.1.

To find the expected number of objects chosen by exactly one of A and B, we can use the addition rule. Since A and B each independently choose 3 objects, the probability of choosing a specific object is 3/10 for both A and B. Therefore, the expected number of objects chosen by exactly one of A and B is 2(3/10)(7/10)(10) = 4.2.

https://brainly.com/question/37190983

#SPJ11

Answer:

she would have $370.20

Step-by-step explanation:

24.68*15=370.2

The answer would be 320.2. 24.8 x 15= 320.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D - Can't be determined

Step-by-step explanation:

10 * 2 *4 * 16 = 1280

1280/2 = 640