Answer:
We need more info
Explanation:
I cannot provide real-time information on a specific crime in Los Angeles due to the nature of my role and this platform. However, in a hypothetical situation of a crime such as armed robbery, the rights of suspects are protected by the U.S. Constitution. The outcome of any given case generally on factors such as the quality of evidence, the stature of prosecution and defense, and the judgement of the court.
Explanation:As a tutor, I cannot provide real-time data on crimes committed in a specific location as of a certain date due to the nature of my role and the Brainly platform in general. However, for educational purposes, let's examine a hypothetical scenario grounded on key points related to U.S. criminal justice system and the rights of the accused.
Let's say that a crime such as armed robbery was committed in Los Angeles within the past week. The details about the suspects and victims are confidential to respect privacy rights. Regardless, the rights of the suspects would be protected by the U.S. Constitution. These rights include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the right to a fair trial. Additionally, they may ask for a change of venue for their trial if they believe the case has received extensive media attention that could affect the jury's impartiality.
As for the outcome, given our hypothetical scenario, it would largely depend on evidence presented, the effectiveness of the prosecution and defense, and the judgement of the court. U.S. crime statistics, public perception of crime, and media influence can play a considerable role in shaping the case and its outcome.
Learn more about U.S. Criminal Justice System here:https://brainly.com/question/4730563
#SPJ12
The devil went down to georgia,
He was looking for a soul to steal
He was in a bind, 'cause he was way behind,
So he was willing to make a deal
When he come across this young man
Sawing on a fiddle and playing it hot
And the devil jumps up on a hickory stump
And said,"boy let me tell you what:
I guess you didn't know it,
But I'm a fiddle player too
And if you'd care to take a dare,
I'll make a bet with you
Now you play a pretty good fiddle, boy,
But give the devil his due
I'll bet a fiddle of gold against your soul'
Cause I think I'm better than you"
The boy said:
"My name's johnny and it might be a sin,
But I'll take your bet, you're gonna regret
'Cause I'm the best that's ever been"
Johnny, rosin up your bow
And play your fiddle hard,
'Cause hell's broke loose in georgia
And the devil deals the cards
And if you win you'll get
This shiny fiddle made of gold,
But if you lose, the devil gets your soul!
The devil opened up his case and said,
"I'll start this show"
And fire flew from his fingertips
As he rosined up his bow
And he pulled the bow across
The strings and it made an evil hiss
Then a band of demons joined in and it
Sounded something like this
When the devil finished,
Johnny said: "Well you're pretty good old son
But sit down in that chair right there,
And let me show you how it's done"
(Fire on the mountain! Run, boys, run!
The devil's in the house of the rising sun
The chicken in the bread pan picking out dough
Granny does your dog bite? No, child, no)
Devil bowed his head because
He knew that he'd been beat
And he laid that golden fiddle
On the ground at johnny's feet
Johnny said:
"Devil, just c'mon back
If you ever wanna try again
'Cause I told you once, you son of a gun,
I'm the best that's ever been!"
(Fire on the mountain! Run, boys, run!
Devil's in the house of the rising sun
Chicken in the bread pan pickin out dough,
Granny, does your dog bite? yes, child, yes)
Answer:
that was wrote by Charlie Daniels which is band. its about a boy named johnny who makes a deal with the devil this song was the bands biggest hit
judicial review means that the court has the right to...
Answer:
Explanation:
The court has the right to decide whether a law or action made by the other branches are constitutional or not.
Explain Common Wealth of Nations
Final answer:
The Commonwealth of Nations is an international organization made up of 54 member countries that promote cooperation and shared values among former territories of the British Empire.
Explanation:
The Commonwealth of Nations is an international organization made up of 54 member countries, most of which were former territories of the British Empire. It was established in 1949 and promotes cooperation among its member states in areas such as politics, education, trade, and culture. The Commonwealth of Nations does not have a central government or a shared currency, but member countries work together on a voluntary basis to address common challenges and promote shared values.
For example, the Commonwealth Secretariat, based in London, provides support to member countries in governance, economic development, and environmental sustainability. The Commonwealth Games, held every four years, bring together athletes from member countries to compete in various sports. The Commonwealth of Nations also promotes human rights, democracy, and the rule of law through its various programs and initiatives.
Freedom of speech is protected by the Constitution in the First Amendment. However, there are some limits to this right. Which scenario shows an example of a time when the right of free speech might be limited?
Answer: a person yells “Fire” in a crowded movie theater when there is no fire
Explanation:
I just did it
If you are able, who should you help first in car crash before an emergency medical squad arrives
Anyone who is bleeding
Anyone who is not walking and talking
Anyone who is walking and talking
The victim closest to you
Final answer:
In a car crash, before emergency medical services arrive, help those who are not walking and talking first, as they may have the most serious injuries. Direct specific bystanders to call for help to combat the bystander effect. If trained, administer first aid or CPR to critically injured individuals.
Explanation:
When you arrive at the scene of a car crash before emergency services, it is crucial to quickly assess the situation and determine who needs the most immediate help. Your actions could potentially save lives. First, ensure that the scene is safe for you to approach. If it is, you should prioritize helping anyone who is not walking and talking, as these individuals may have more serious injuries or be unconscious. People who are walking and talking are likely to have less severe injuries and can often help themselves or wait for additional assistance. For bleeding individuals, urgent care is needed to prevent blood loss, but always consider the severity and type of injury when prioritizing.
Why is the right to a jury trial guaranteed by the Bill of Rights? Why might someone choose not to have a jury trial?
The right to a jury trial guaranteed by the Bill of Rights to prevent oppression by the government.
Explanation:This reflects a clear judgement on which way a law should be carried on, a law is enforced and how the justice is given. The criminal defendants can seek the right to jury to "prevent oppression by the government" and raise their voice against any misdoings.
A defendant may arrive before the court and seek justice if he or she thinks that he has been going through injustice. It is most important fundamental rights in America. All the defendants are allowed to the right to jury trial.
As described in Article V of the U.S. Constitution one way an Amendment of the U.S. Constitution can be proposed is by two-thirds of the states calling for a constitutional convention. Which selection below is actually the way in which all of the Amendments to date have been proposed?
Answer: The actual wording of Article V is: “The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments,
Answer:
two third of the total senate and house representatives
Explanation:
Which of the following cases is not one that the Warren Court established?
The Roe v. Wade case is not one that the Warren Court established.
Explanation:
Roe v. Wade, a court case of the US Supreme Court was a landmark decision that protected the pregnant woman's liberty to have a choice to have an abortion without government restriction. The Ruling court for Roe v. Wade case is the Supreme Court of the United States.
The term Warren Court applies to the highest court of the United States under Chief judge Earl Warren, which was held from 5 October 1953 to 23 June 1969, and is arguably one of the two significant times of American constitutional law history.
Warren, as Chief Judge, used his political power to direct the Court into decisions that are often contentious and which dramatically increase civil rights and freedoms and the judicial branch.
Warren Court essentially ended racial discrimination in U.S. government schools, expanded plaintiffs ' constitutional rights, guaranteed equal opportunity in state parliamentarians, banned public school state priests, and paving the way for abortive legalization.
Which is the BEST explanation for the reason our "Founding Fathers" built a system of checks and balances into our government?They wanted to make sure that only well-educated, wealthy citizens held political power in America's government.
Eliminate
B) They saw the need to balance political power between "free" states in the North and "slave" states in the South.
C) They wanted to prevent the abuses of power that America experienced while under control of the British government.
D) They felt that a system of "checks and balances" would help the executive branch become the most powerful of the three branches.
The BEST explanation for the reason our 'Founding Fathers' built a system of checks and balances into our government is option C) They wanted to prevent the abuses of power that America experienced while under control of the British government.
The Founding Fathers of the United States were deeply influenced by their historical experiences and the prevailing Enlightenment ideas of their time. They recognized the dangers of unchecked power, having seen its consequences in the form of British monarchical rule. To safeguard against such abuses, they established a system of checks and balances — a cornerstone design in the U.S. Constitution. This system ensures that the three branches of government, the legislative, executive, and judicial, share power equally and can each limit the actions of the others, preventing any single branch from gaining dominance. This balance of power encourages cooperation, consultation, and compromise, making it difficult for policy to be enacted without broad support. As highlighted in Federalist No. 51, James Madison explained that these checks and balances are essential to maintain a stable government that operates with the consent of the governed and is responsible to the people.
How many county courts are there in Texas? Does the number include the statutory county (243 courts) and the statutory probate courts (18 courts)?
Texas has county courts, statutory county courts, and statutory probate courts. The number of county courts does not include the statutory county courts and the statutory probate courts.
Explanation:Texas has several types of state courts, including county courts, statutory county courts, and statutory probate courts. County courts are trial courts with limited jurisdiction, handling criminal misdemeanors, minor civil cases, and some probate matters.
The statutory county courts in Texas are not part of the county court system, but rather specialized courts with jurisdiction over certain types of cases, such as guardianships and eminent domain. The statutory probate courts are also separate from the county court system, and they handle exclusively probate matters.
Therefore, the number of county courts in Texas does not include the statutory county courts and the statutory probate courts.
Learn more about Texas county courts here:https://brainly.com/question/32118316
#SPJ12
Interpret the following quote:
"You can't declare a war on drugs without declaring a war on people."
Answer:
Since the people are the consumers of these drugs and the ones who choose their political power, you must contest the issue of drugs with them first before actually taking action on the matter of drugs itself. If you declare a war on drugs first without declaring a war on the people, the people have every right to be infuriated and rebel against you as it seems as though you would be threatening an aspect of their individual right: liberty. In this case, the power of liberty assures the people that they have complete freedom to possess and do as they please with drugs without any limitations. By the constitution, the people have every right to go against an individual of power who threatens their individual rights. If you do not provide any reasoning to the people as to why you're declaring a war on the drugs, they will perceive it as a threat to their individual right and an abusive execution of power.
Which ICS Supervisory Position title is used at the Division/Group organizational level? A. Leader B. Supervisor C. Officer D. Chief
Answer:
Supervisor
Explanation:
ICS is standardized management hierarchy to manage workflow of any size. The procedure of ICS should be established beforehand and approved by concerned authorities. ICS positions were created to map activities accroding to their complexity to different position in the organization.
Given below is ICS Position at organizational level.
Command Staff-- Officer
General Staff (Section) --Chief
Division/Group -- Supervisor
Strike Team/Task Force-- Leader
Please help I need an awnser
Please choose multiple
Which qualifications are unique to Emergency and Fire Management careers? Select all that apply.
handling emergencies and dangers with courage and stress management
understanding details for inspecting hazards
displaying integrity and teamwork
having quick reflexes and first-aid skills
having critical thinking and observational skills
having driving skills and the ability to use ladders, hoses, and medical tools
Answer:1,3,4,6,
Explanation:
The qualifications unique to Emergency and Fire Management careers are handling emergencies and dangers with courage and stress management, displaying integrity and teamwork, having quick reflexes and first-aid skills and driving skills and the ability to use ladders, hoses, and medical tools.
What is stress management?Stress management is a wide spectrum of techniques and psychotherapies aimed at controlling a person's level of stress, especially chronic stress, usually for the purpose of improving everyday functioning. Stress produces numerous physical and mental symptoms which vary according to each individual's situational factors.
These can include a decline in physical health, such as headaches, chest pain, fatigue, and sleep problems, as well as depression. The process of stress management is named as one of the keys to a happy and successful life in modern society.
Life often delivers numerous demands that can be difficult to handle, but stress management provides a number of ways to manage anxiety and maintain overall well-being.
Learn more about management, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29023210
#SPJ6
Limited government is the concept that a government's power over its citizens should have limitations. Which of these
Amendments is MOST closely associated with the idea of limited government?
A. First amendment
B. Sixth
C.Tenth
an example of a victimless crime is
Answer:
Victimless crimes are crimes that do not directly and specifically harm another party. ... Some examples of victimless crimes are public drunkenness, innapropriate dress, unclean conduct etc
Explanation:
Answer:
a crime that doesn't affect others: public nudity and things like that
Explanation:
Impaired drivers often _________ without checking for cross traffic or pedestrians.
88.
In which ways do search warrants and arrest warrants treat
probable cause?
a. both require probable cause.
b. the definition of probable cause is the same for both.
c. both require probable cause to be determined by a judge.
d. all of the above.
Also i will put a few questions under in the comments if you can answer as well thank you.
Answer: all of the above
Explanation:
Final answer:
Both search and arrest warrants require probable cause, which is defined consistently between them and must be determined by a judge. The correct answer is c.
Explanation:
Probable cause is a legal standard used to justify the issuance of both search warrants and arrest warrants. It refers to the level of reasonable belief that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime exists, which is necessary for a warrant to be issued. In both cases, probable cause must be established before a judge, who evaluates the evidence presented by law enforcement officers or prosecutors.
The judge then determines whether there is sufficient justification to grant the warrant. Therefore, both search warrants and arrest warrants rely on the presence of probable cause as a fundamental requirement for their issuance, ensuring that constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures are upheld.
In a burglary, pry or tool marks on a window may NOT act as ______. a. corpus delecti evidence
b. evidence to identify a culprit
c. associative evidence
d. biological evidence
In a burglary, pry or tool marks on a window may not act as biological evidence. Thus, the correct option is (D).
Biological evidence includes biological elements or substances such as hair, tissue, bones, teeth, blood, sperm, or other bodily fluids, as well as artifacts containing biological material that is used to verify and offer proof of assertions or claims in court.
The main significance of biological evidence is that it is confirmatory in nature due to the existence of DNA.
Therefore, the correct option is "D".
To know more about the biological evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31816430
#SPJ2
74.
Once the specific item mentioned in a search warrant is
found:
a. the search must stop.
b. the officers must take a break.
c. the officers can keep looking; they might find more items.
d. none of the above.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
which of the following are considered direct costs for workplace accidents? Select all that apply. Absenteeism
Fees
Bills
Decreased productivity
Answer:
bills
fees
Explanation:
Answer:
Fess and bills
Explanation:
Workplace accidents that refer to situations in which an employee suffers an injury on the job have direct and indirect costs. The direct costs are those costs that are related to the damage like the medical expenses, legal services and compensations. The indirect costs are the costs that are not directly associated to the damage like lost of productivity and bad image for the company. According to this, the direct costs for workplace accidents are fees and bills.
The other options are not correct because absenteeism and decreased productivity are indirect cost.
5. If you had to reform the system of punishments and corrections, what would you do? Why?
Reform of the system of punishments and corrections could involve increasing focus on rehabilitation, reviewing sentencing laws, and ensuring fair treatment. Alternatives to incarceration and addressing root causes of criminal behavior could reduce prison populations and prevent recidivism.
When considering the reform of the system of punishments and corrections, some key areas could be addressed. These include increasing the focus on rehabilitation, reviewing sentencing laws to avoid unjustly punished outcomes, and ensuring equity in the treatment of all individuals within the justice system. Enhancing rehabilitation efforts seeks to prepare inmates for reintegration into society, potentially reducing recidivism. Sentencing laws should be evaluated to ensure they are fair and proportional to the crimes committed, avoiding excessively harsh penalties for minor offenses. Ensuring equity is about addressing systemic biases that may lead to certain groups being disproportionately targeted by the criminal justice system.
Furthermore, alternatives to incarceration such as community service or restorative justice programs are worth exploring. Implementing these can help in reducing the overall prison population while still holding individuals accountable for their actions. Effective programs that address the root causes of criminal behavior, such as substance abuse or lack of education and employment opportunities, could also be impactful in reforming the system.
If a formal complaint is filed against a mortgage lender under the Mortgage Brokers, Lenders, and Servicers Licensing Act, the licensee has right to which of the following?
An immediate judicial review
The opportunity for an informal conference
30 days to contest the complaint
Restitution against the complainant if no violation is discovered
The licensee has the right to the opportunity for an informal conference.
Explanation:
A person on whom the complaint has been registered in reference to Act No. 306 of the Public Act of 1969 may request settlement within 15 days; it is an opportunity to settle the matter in an informal conference. An informal conference comes in picture only when the other party on whom the complaint has been filed agrees for a settlement. If this held the hearing of the complaint shall be postponed.A death from motor vehicle crash happens in Florida every three hours
Compared with the US Constitution, how difficult is it to amend state constitutions?
A.
The US Constitution is easier to amend.
B.
Each is difficult to amend.
C.
State constitutions are easier to amend.
OD. Each is easy to amend.
Answer:c
Explanation:
I looker it up
State constitutions are easier to amend compared to the US Constitution due to their specificity and the frequency of amendments over time, unlike the rigorous and seldom successful amendment process of the US Constitution.
Compared with the US Constitution, state constitutions are easier to amend. The US Constitution is known for its rigorous amendment process, which has only allowed it to be amended 27 times since 1789, despite over eleven thousand proposals. This highlights the complexity and the difficulty involved in amending the US Constitution, described by experts as 'extraordinarily difficult'. On the other hand, state constitutions have been through numerous amendments, with some states like Texas approving 491 amendments since its adoption in 1876. State constitutions tend to be more specific and detailed, often resulting in a higher frequency of amendments to adapt to new policies or societal changes.
What are the components of a will?
This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:
What are the four major components of a will?
A. proposal, directives, power of attorney, trusts
B. statement, clauses, executor, amendments
C. principle, conditions, beneficiary, notary
D. purpose, considerations, executor, codicil
Answer:
The correct answer is: D. purpose, considerations, executor, codicil.
Explanation:
We must first begin by clarifying what a will is. A will is a legal declaration of what a person wants to do with all the material assets that they possess, once they have died.
Now these are its four main components:
Purpose: In this section the person will legally designate someone who will be in charge of all these assets once they have died. Consideration: Here it will be established how these assets will be distributed. Executor: Here someone will be appointed and is who will be in charge of the administrative part, and who will be responsible for executing the will of the person after his death. Codicil: It is the presentation of the document in written form that contains all this information.From this excerpt, Aristotle gives a cautious endorsement of A) Tyranny. B) Aristocracy. C) the Rule of Man. D) the Rule of Law.
Answer:
rule of lawthis
Explanation:
Final answer:
Aristotle cautiously endorsed the Rule of Law as an essential foundation for a balanced government that combines aspects of monarchy, aristocracy, and polity to ensure the public good and avoid the pitfalls of each system's corrupt forms.
Explanation:
From the philosophical writings of Aristotle, it is evident that he provides a cautious endorsement for the Rule of Law. Aristotle pondered the virtues and pitfalls of different forms of government including monarchy, aristocracy, and polity (a form of democracy). Despite recognizing the potential for monarchy to degrade into tyranny and aristocracy into oligarchy, Aristotle believed that a mix of these forms, underpinned by the rule of law and a strong middle class, would help ensure the public good.
Aristotle advocated for a political system in which multiple classes, including those with more and less wealth, would be represented in government. This form of government, known as Politeia, would be balanced by a respect for the rule of law to prevent the corruptions associated with each individual system. Aristotle’s ideal suggests a regime that would aim to serve the whole community, not merely the interests of a majority or a select few.
Overall, Aristotle's vision echoes through history, influencing modern democratic thought with its emphasis on balancing government power, participation of the middle class, and adherence to laws that serve the collective interest.
Alexander is an evidence custodian in his district. He is scheduled to travel to a conference next month. Who must he ensure will be available to take his place? Alexander calls a(n)
REPRESENTATIVE OR ASSISTANT must be ensured for the availability to take Alexander position.
Explanation:As Alexander is an evidence custodian which is a very crucial responsibility that he has in his district, if there are certain times when Alexander will not be able to make certain commitments then it would be safe to say that Alexander can ask his representative or assistant for the same.
As an evidence custodian there must be a assistant or Representative to whom Alexander can turn at times like these where he can not travel to a conference scheduled to be next month. It is then the role of that particular representative or assistant to be at the conference at Alexander's stead and carry out the proceedings or deal with the matters at hand accordingly.
Why was the state legislature's action allowed by the U.S. Constitution?
O
A. Because the Constitution specifies that local governments cannot
control natural resources
O
B. Because the Constitution is based on Dillon's rule
O
C. Because the Constitution forbids municipal home rule
O
D. Because the Constitution does not address how state and local
governments share power
Answer:
because the Constitution does not address how state and local government share power
Answer:
The Correct Answer is D
Because the Constitution does not address how state and local government share power .
Explanation:
The State legislature obeys the conditions of Article V of the United States Constitution, state legislators manage the authority to approve Constitutional reformations which have been recommended by both houses of Congress and they also keep the capability to request for a federal committee to propose improvements to the United States Constitution.
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
Which of these pieces of evidence would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early?
Dibeast has lunch every week with Ms. Snoozer and trains her birds
Dibeast saw the birds on Early's property the day the birds went missing,
Dibeast is an animal control officer who often has to capture Ms. Snoozer's birds.
Dibeast witnessed that Early's cat was trained and well behaved. Need help quick
Answer:
It is the 4th option! I just took the test and the 4th option was correct!!
Explanation:
The piece of evidence that would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early is D. Dibeast witnessed that Early's cat was trained and well behaved.
It should be noted that based on the complete information, Susy Snoozer wanted compensation for her missing birds and this is what the case was about.
The piece of evidence that would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early is that Dibeast witnessed that Early's cat was trained and well behaved. In this situation, this will be vital in supporting the claim that the cats didn't kill the birds.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/15611394
What are the purposes of private prisons
Answer:
Explanation:
Private prisons save money by hiring fewer guards, paying them less, and giving them less training, as well as by providing fewer educational, medical, and enrichment services to inmates. The result is less control of the inmates and more violence.
Final answer:
Private prisons are believed to introduce cost-savings, but often at the risk of sacrificing service quality and rehabilitation efforts. The rise of private prisons is linked to political shifts towards harsher sentencing and a prison-industrial complex with interests in maintaining high incarceration rates. Ongoing debates question the fairness and effectiveness of the justice system, particularly concerning its approach to rehabilitation and tackling underlying social issues.
Explanation:
The purposes of private prisons are multi-faceted and complex within the American criminal justice system. Arguably, the main purported advantage of private prisons is the potential for cost-savings generated by the efficiencies of the private sector. However, this economic incentive also carries the risk that private prisons may compromise the quality of their services to maximize profits, potentially undermining the goals of rehabilitation and human rights. Furthermore, the expansion of private prisons may be influenced by the industry's economic interests, potentially affecting incarceration and recidivism rates.
In the context of U.S. history, the rise of private prisons correlates with a cultural and political shift towards a "get tough on crime" approach in the 1970s. This political landscape, combined with the ability to elect judges and law enforcement officers, led to an explosion of the prison population. Notably, incarceration is now increasingly criticized for failing to address underlying social issues, such as poverty and drug addiction, with arguments suggesting a society too reliant on imprisonment as a solution.
Federal statistics indicate a significant increase in the incarceration rate from 1970 to present times, highlighting concerns about the role of race and poverty in this growth. Critics of the current system link it to economic incentives similar to those behind the military-industrial complex, suggesting a powerful prison-industrial complex at work. Issues relating to the justice system's fairness, effectiveness in rehabilitation, and treatment of inmates continue to fuel ongoing debates about the role of prisons in society.