Jessica is going to paint her patio. It is made up of two rectangles. One measures 7 ft x 4 ft x 5 ft, and the other measures 10ft x 8ft x 6ft. What is the total area of her patio?

Answer:

a 24

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Option C is correct

(1, 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

A system of equations contains two or more than two linear equations that divide two or more unknowns.

To find a solution for the system of equations,

we must find a value from the graph that is true for all equations in the given system.

We know that:

If the graphs of the equations intersect,

then there is one solution that is true for both equations.

Given the graph.

There are two lines

Equation of Blue line : y = -x+6

Equation of Red line = y = 2x+3

Since, the graph of two lines y = -x+6 and  y = 2x+3 intersects which means there is one solution that satisfies the both equation.

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations graphed is, (1, 5)

General Idea:

Solving for a variable means getting that variable by itself by UNDOING whatever is done to it. We need to perform reverse operation to UNDO.

Applying the concept:

[tex] \frac{4q-6n}{3m}=f\\ \\ To \; undo \; 3m\; in\; the \; denominator \; 3m, \; MULTIPLY \; 3m\; on\; both\; sides [/tex]

[tex] 3m \times \frac{4q-6n}{3m}=f \times 3m\\ \\ 4q-6n=3mf\\Add \; 6n \; both\; sides\\ \\ 4q-6n+6n=3mf+6n\\ Combine \; like\; terms\\ \\ 4q=3mf+6n\\Divide \; 4\; on\; both\; sides\\ \\ \frac{4q}{4} =\frac{3mf+6n}{4} \\ Simplify\; fraction\; in\; left\; sides\\ \\ q=\frac{3mf+6n}{4} [/tex]

Conclusion:

[tex] Solving \; the \; equation \; \frac{4q-6n}{3m}=f \; for q, \; we get...\\ \\q=\frac{3mf+6n}{4} [/tex]

By applying Fermat's Little Theorem, we can find the least positive residue of [tex]2^{1000000[/tex] modulo 17. Using the repeated squaring method, we calculate that [tex]2^{16[/tex] is congruent to 1 modulo 17. Therefore, [tex]2^{1000000[/tex] is also congruent to 1 modulo 17.

Fermat's Little Theorem states that if p is a prime number and a is any positive integer that is not divisible by p, then a raised to the power of p-1 is congruent to 1 modulo p. In this case, we need to find the least positive residue of 2 raised to the power of 1000000 modulo 17.

First, we need to find the value of 2 raised to the power of 16 modulo 17, since 17 is a prime number. Using the repeated squaring method, we can calculate:

[tex]2^2[/tex] = 4 (mod 17)

[tex]2^4[/tex] = [tex](2^2)^2[/tex] = [tex]4^2[/tex] = 16 (mod 17)

[tex]2^8[/tex] = [tex](2^4)^2[/tex] = [tex]16^2[/tex] = 1 (mod 17)

[tex]2^{16[/tex] = [tex](2^8)^2[/tex] = [tex]1^2[/tex] = 1 (mod 17)

Now, we can find the value of [tex]2^{1000000[/tex] modulo 17 using the fact that [tex]2^{16[/tex] is congruent to 1 modulo 17:

[tex]2^{1000000[/tex] = [tex](2^{16})^{62500[/tex] x [tex]2^0[/tex] = [tex]1^{62500[/tex] x 1 = 1 (mod 17)

Therefore, the least positive residue of [tex]2^{1000000[/tex] modulo 17 is 1.

Answer:

  690

Step-by-step explanation:

Put 30 where m is in the expression and do the arithmetic. Or, simpify the expression first, then do the same.

  14·30 +30 +17·30 -9·30 = 420 +30 +510 -270 = 690

Simplifying first, you have ...

  14m +m +17m -9m = m(14 +1 +17 -9) = 23m

  23·30 = 690

To solve the equation 14m + m + 17m - 9m when m=30, substitute the value of m in the equation and follow order or operations. The result is 960.

To solve for the given problem involving the variable m, simply substitute the value of m into the equation. The equation given is 14m + m + 17m - 9m. Substituting 30 for m in the equation gives us: 14(30) + 30 + 17(30) - 9(30). To solve this, use the order of operations principle, which states that multiplication and division should be performed before addition and subtraction.

First, perform the multiplication: 420 + 30 + 510 - 270. Next, add and subtract from left to right: 960. Thus, if m = 30, then 14m + m + 17m - 9m = 960.

https://brainly.com/question/32202484

#SPJ2

HL congruence theorems or postulates used to prove ΔLMN ≈ΔOPQ.

Congruent figures have sides that are the same length and angles that are the same measurement. In other words, congruent figures are those in which one figure superimposes another.

If two line segments have the same length, they are said to be congruent. If two angles have the same measure, they are said to be congruent. If the matching sides and angles of two triangles are equal, they are said to be congruent.

We have two Triangles as ΔLMN and ΔOPQ

As, per the figure both triangles are Right angles Triangle.

Also, LM = OP

MN = PQ

LN = OQ

and, the hypotenuse of both triangles also Equal.

Thus, both triangle are Congruent using HL theorem.

Learn more about Congruency here:

https://brainly.com/question/7888063

#SPJ7

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

The given inequality is:

|-8x+24| \leq 16

This inequality can be divided in two parts as:

a) -16 \leq -8x +24

b) -8x + 24 \leq 16

Solving part a:

-16 \leq -8x+24 \\ \\ 
-40 \leq -8x \\ \\ 
5 \geq x \\ 
or \\ 
x \leq 5

Solving part b:

-8x+24 \leq 16 \\ \\ 
-8x \leq -8 \\ \\ 
x \geq 1

Therefore, the solution to the given inequality is x \leq 5 and x \geq 1. Combining both the ranges we get the solution: 1 \leq x \leq 5.

In interval notation, this solution can be expressed as [1,5

Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/9377317#readmore

Answer:

There are 3 elements in the set.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given set,

{A, B, C}

∵ Set is the collection of defined distinct objects,

These objects are called elements of the set,

We have given a set in which A, B, C are present thus they must be distinct,

So, by the above definition,

The given set has three elements.

Using the binomial distribution, it is found that there is a 0.936 = 93.6% probability that he makes 2 shots or less.

-------------------

For each throw, there are only two possible outcomes. Either the player makes it, or he misses it. The probability of making a throw is independent of any other throw, which means that the binomial probability distribution is used to solve this question.

Binomial probability distribution

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

In this question:

The probability of making 2 or less is the probability that he does not make all of them, that is:

[tex]P(X < 3) = 1 - P(X = 3)[/tex]

In which

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 3) = C_{3,3}.(0.4)^{3}.(0.6)^{0} = 0.064[/tex]

[tex]P(X < 3) = 1 - P(X = 3) = 1 - 0.064 = 0.936[/tex]

0.936 = 93.6% probability that he makes 2 shots or less.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/15557838

Polygons can be classified by their sides and angles using formulas and definitions like regular polygons with equal sides and angles.

Polygons can be classified by their sides and angles. A regular polygon has equal sides and equal angles, such as an equilateral triangle or a square. The sum of interior angles in any polygon can be calculated using the formula 180 * (n - 2) degrees where n is the number of sides.

To find the probability mass function (pmf) of the number of red M&Ms in a bag, use the binomial distribution formula. The probability a bag has no red M&Ms is calculated by raising (4/5) to the 25th power, as per the binomial distribution with a success probability of 1/5 and 25 trials.

The question involves finding the probability mass function (pmf) of the number of red M&Ms in a bag of 25 M&Ms where each M&M has an equal chance of being one of five colors.

To determine the pmf of the number of red M&Ms, which we'll call r, we can use the binomial distribution, since each M&M is an independent Bernoulli trial with two outcomes (red or not red), and each M&M has the same probability of being red.

The probability of getting a red M&M is 1/5, so the pmf of r for k red M&Ms in a bag of 25 is given by P(r=k) = (25 choose k) × (1/5)^k × (4/5)^(25-k).

To find the probability that a bag has no red M&Ms, we set k to 0 in the pmf formula: P(r=0) = (25 choose 0) × (1/5)⁰ × (4/5)²⁵. This simplifies to (4/5)²⁵, since any number to the zero power is 1 and (25 choose 0) is also 1.

Answer:

8.2%

Step-by-step explanation:

o-ware

Final answer:

Using the z-score calculation and the standard normal distribution, approximately 6.68% of fully grown English oak trees are taller than 110 feet.

Explanation:

To find the proportion of fully grown English oak trees taller than 110 feet, given that the heights are normally distributed with a mean of 95 feet and a standard deviation of 10 feet, we first calculate the z-score for a height of 110 feet. The z-score is calculated using the formula: z = (X - μ) / σ, where X is the value of interest (110 feet), μ is the mean (95 feet), and σ is the standard deviation (10 feet).

By substituting the given values: z = (110 - 95) / 10 = 1.5. This z-score represents the number of standard deviations 110 feet is above the mean. To find the proportion of trees taller than 110 feet, we consult the standard normal distribution table or use a calculator that provides the area to the right of the z-score, which corresponds to the proportion we seek.

The standard normal distribution table or a calculator shows that the proportion of the area under the curve to the right of a z-score of 1.5 is approximately 0.0668.

Thus, about 6.68% of fully grown English oak trees are taller than 110 feet.

Final answer:

To determine what Noah will receive or pay after figuring his taxes for the year, we need to calculate his tax liability. According to the 2020 tax brackets, a married couple filing jointly with a taxable income of $27,156 falls into the 12% tax bracket. Since Noah has already paid $3,260 in federal taxes, he has overpaid his taxes and will receive a refund of $1.28.

Explanation:

To determine what Noah will receive or pay after figuring his taxes for the year, we need to calculate his tax liability.

First, we need to determine his taxable income after considering his filing status. As he is filing as married filing jointly, we can check the tax brackets for that status.

According to the 2020 tax brackets, a married couple filing jointly with a taxable income of $27,156 falls into the 12% tax bracket. To calculate the tax liability, we multiply the taxable income by the tax rate, which gives us $27,156 * 0.12 = $3,258.72.

Since Noah has already paid $3,260 in federal taxes, he has paid more than his tax liability for the year. In this case, he will receive a tax refund equal to the difference between his tax liability and the amount he has already paid, so the amount he will receive is $3,258.72 - $3,260 = $-1.28.

Therefore, Noah will receive a tax refund of $1.28 after figuring his taxes for the year.