Lincoln Steffens was considered a reformer specifically because he

The weapons and battle tactics used by both sides during the Revolutionary War were consistent with those used by European armies for the previous 15 or so years. Both sides used similar weapons and fought using similar tactics.

Answers:

2. the use of armed forces to spread communism

3. the threat of a communist invasion of Taiwan (Formosa)

4. North Korea’s defiance of UN orders

5. the potential for instability in the Pacific area

Truman was concerned about the events on the Korean Peninsula due to the use of subversive tactics to spread communism, the threat it posed to Taiwan, the defiance of UN resolutions by North Korea, and the overall potential for instability in the Pacific.

President Truman had several concerns regarding the events on the Korean Peninsula. Firstly, the communists' use of subversive tactics was alarming, as it suggested a strategy to expand Communist influence underhandly. Secondly, the use of armed forces to spread communism, demonstrated by the North Korean invasion of South Korea, posed a direct challenge to international peace and the containment policy. Thirdly, the threat of a communist invasion of Taiwan (Formosa) was a significant concern for US foreign policy in Asia. The potential for instability in the Pacific area worried Truman as it could lead to wider conflicts and undermine the security of critical regions like Japan. Lastly, North Korea's defiance of UN orders reflected a disregard for international norms and heightened the potential for conflict.

The answer is a the upanishads

The Stanford Prison Experiment was terminated early due to severe ethical issues and the emotional distress of participants, with prisoners exhibiting severe stress and guards engaging in sadistic behavior. The experiment underscored how powerful assigned roles and situational factors can become, influencing individual behavior.

Why the Stanford Prison Experiment Was Stopped Early

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study involving students from Stanford University. This experiment was designed to observe the behavioral effects of prisoners and guards in a mock prison environment. However, the experiment was halted abruptly after six days due to severe ethical concerns and emotional breakdowns of the participants.

Participants were assigned to play the roles of either prisoners or guards in a mock prison created in the basement of the psychology building at Stanford. The prisoners started exhibiting signs of extreme stress, anxiety, and hopelessness, while the guards began to show increasingly sadistic behavior. Phillip Zimbardo, the leading professor and designer of the study, also realized he had become too absorbed in his role as the prison superintendent, which compromised his objectivity as a researcher.

The 'good' guards did not object to the abusive behavior of other guards, as they felt helpless to intervene, and the group dynamics and allocated roles led to a discouraging environment for resistance. Contrary to appearing weak, student prisoners were essentially trapped in a powerful situational force that pressured conformity and submission, and they began tolerating guards' abuse. This dynamic exemplified how societal roles and situational pressures can influence individuals' behavior profoundly.

Zimbardo himself acknowledged the need to terminate the experiment early: 'We had created an overwhelmingly powerful situation...in which some of the guards were behaving sadistically.' This experiment remains a historical example of the potential ethical issues and psychological impacts of role-playing studies.

Final answer:

The Stanford prison experiment was halted after six days due to extreme and abusive behavior by guards, severe emotional distress among prisoners, and loss of objectivity by the lead researcher, Philip Zimbardo.

Explanation:

The Stanford prison experiment was stopped after only a few days because the simulated prison environment had a profoundly negative impact on all participants. Both 'prisoners' and 'guards' took their roles to extremes, with the guards exhibiting abusive and authoritarian behavior, while the prisoners showed signs of severe emotional distress. The 'good' guards did not stop the abuse, as they seemed to feel powerless within the established dynamic. The architect of the study, Philip Zimbardo, became engrossed in his role as the prison superintendent, compromising his professional objectivity. Recognizing the harmful effects and unethical nature of the events unfolding, the decision was made to terminate the experiment after only six days, despite the original plan for it to last two weeks.

Small pox mostly wiped out most of the tribes/civilizations that lived there. Including warriors

The introduction of smallpox by the Spanish in the 1500s led to a massive decline in the Native American population, which weakened their resistance against the Spanish conquest and enabled the Spanish to consolidate and maintain power in their colonies.

The Spanish conquest of the Americas in the 1500s brought many effects on the native populace, one of the major ones being the introduction of European diseases such as smallpox. The Native American communities had no immunity to smallpox, leading to devastating and immense loss of life, which consequentially weakened their ability to resist the Spanish conquest. This fact facilitated the Spanish consolidation and maintenance of power throughout their colonies.

Additionally, the Spanish exploited both the land and the people of the Americas for their economic advantage. The decline in the native population due to diseases like smallpox meant that the Spanish could impose their economic and political control over the colonies with less resistance. The institutions they established intentionally deprived indigenous tribes of their natural resources, further disempowering them and strengthening Spanish control.

Lastly, another unfortunate result of the population decline due to smallpox was the Spanish's increased use of African and indigenousforcedd labor. With fewer Native Americans to work the lands, the Spanish often turned to slave labor to maintain their colonies. These dynamics all contributed to the Spanish's long-term establishment, consolidation, and maintenance of their colonial empire.

https://brainly.com/question/32140015

#SPJ11

The Constitution of the United States stablishes three different branches of power in a federal government.

Article 1 of the United States Constitution stablishes the Legislative Branch. That is the Congress, which is responsible for creating laws.

Article 2 of the United States Constitution establishes the Executive Branch, the President, that is in charge of approve and carry out the laws.

Article 3 of the United States Constitution establishes the Judicial Branch, which consists of the United States Supreme Court. This is the one that interprets the laws passed by the Legislative Branch.

A president or other officers can be impeached for  Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Hope it helped

A president or other officials can be impeached for 'high crimes and misdemeanors', which broadly refers to serious misconduct. Impeachment requires a majority in the House of Representatives and a two-thirds majority in the Senate. Upon conviction, the impeached official may be barred from future office and may still be subject to further legal consequences.

A president or other officers can be impeached for what the Constitution describes as 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. This terminology refers essentially to serious misconduct by a government official. However, the specific definition of what constitutes such 'high crimes and misdemeanors' is often subjected to political interpretation.

Impeachment is a two-tiered process that involves both chambers of the U.S. Congress. The House of Representatives has the sole power of impeachment. If they decide to impeach, they are essentially bringing formal charges against the official. The official is then tried in the Senate, with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding over the trial. For a conviction, a two-thirds majority in the Senate is necessary.

There have been a few historical instances of impeachment in U.S. history, but removal from office remains a rare event indeed. Upon conviction and removal, the impeached official may be disqualified from holding future office and still be liable for indictment, trial, and punishment according to the law.

https://brainly.com/question/1411922

#SPJ2

That they would not stop until they made up a new Constitution.

Hope this helps! Brainliest is always appreciated!

The correct answer is - A. Romans adopted Greek gods but gave them new names.

The Romans and the Greeks interacted for a long time. The Greeks developed as a civilization earlier than them, so it was natural for the Romans to adopt some traits of a civilization that was more advanced and they were familiar with. They did this with the gods. The Romans adopted the Greek gods, and even though they kept their characteristics, they decided to change their names, so there was a situation where both civilization had the total same gods, but they had different names for them. One of the many examples is the Greek goddess Aphrodite, which the Romans named as Venus.

Answer:

Romans adopted Greek gods but gave them new names

Explanation:

took the test

The social stratification of Muslims was not so rigid in early medieval period. The Quran  repeatedly advocates the concept of an egalitarian society. The social mobility of Muslims in early medieval period was one of the reasons which helped Muslims to establish their empires allover the world and spread the teachings of Islam.

One example of social mobility in Muslim society  in the eighth and early ninth centuries was that the slaves- the bottom class of society could rose to higher ranks in administration. We see during this period there were so many slaves who were great military generals and ministers. They rose to the position of governors of provinces as well. It were the khurasan slaves who helped the Abassids to establish such a great empire. The Muslim rulers even married their daughters to these slaves who later became the emperor of Muslim kingdoms as well.

Social mobility in Muslim society in the eighth and ninth centuries was demonstrated through the conversion of non-Muslims to improve their social standing and chances for upward mobility.

Social mobility in Muslim society in the eighth and ninth centuries can be observed through examples such as the conversion of non-Muslims to improve their social standing and chances for upward mobility. Merchants often converted to Islam to gain access to Islamic trading networks and potential business partners. Non-Muslim men seeking to marry Muslim women were required to convert, providing them with better social connections. These examples highlight how individuals would change their religious affiliation to increase their social mobility within Muslim society during that time period.

The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico.

hope this helps!

The great plains are the largest desert area in the Texas region. Thus, option A is correct.

A desert is a barren land covered in sand that usually has a very high temperature during the day and extremely child temperature at the night, they usually have a scarcity of water and receive a low magnitude of precipitation.

There are four types of deserts:

The Great Plains, sometimes known as the Great American Desert, cover a large part of the western part of Texas in a wide, flat, elevated plain covered in thick layers of sediment material.

They are also one of the largest parts of South Central in America. They are a key producer of agriculture and farm animal. Therefore, option A is the correct option.

Learn more about desert, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2770261

#SPJ6

Answer

The positive effects of capitalism are;

• Economic  freedom that helps political freedom

• Firms acquire incentives to be efficient and produce goods

• Consumers are free to choose products according to their desires

• There is reduced bureaucratic in the government

Explanation

Capitalism is system in economy where there is lack of government intervention and the means of production is owned by private firms. The government does not control prices thus the goods and services distribution is based on price mechanism. In capitalism, people own private properties and have the right to gain wealth and compete in the market. Due to this competition, the industries responsible end up producing high quality goods. In this economic system, a person can earn money according to the importance of their role in the society. Through this system, people are encouraged to contribute to the economy thus in the process gain wealth and promote wealth for others too.

Answer:  

The beneficial outcomes of private enterprise are;  

Economic  freedom that helps political opportunity  

Firms gain motivating forces to be effective and create merchandise  

Consumers are allowed to pick items as per their wants  

There is diminished bureaucratic in the legislature  

Explanation:

Free enterprise is framework in economy where there is absence of government intercession and the methods for generation is possessed by private firms. The administration does not control costs in this way the products and ventures dispersion depends on value component. In free enterprise, individuals claim private properties and have the privilege to pick up riches and contend in the market. Because of this opposition, the enterprises dependable wind up delivering top notch merchandise. In this monetary framework, a man can gain cash as indicated by the significance of their job in the general public.

Wouldn't it be all of them? They can all come into use at some point

Ambassadors are individuals nominated by the president to represent the United States diplomatically in foreign countries, international organizations, and ambassadors-at-large.

The ambassador represents the nominating government abroad, working within the broad policy guidelines of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, chaired by the country's foreign minister, and has a significant impact on boosting bilateral relations through speeding mutual cooperation.

Under its words, the President appoints ambassadors, ministers, foreign service officers, and consuls with the advice and approval of the Senate, but in fact, the great majority of the appointments are made based on recommendations from a Board of the Foreign Service.

For more information about Ambassadors refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1290731

#SPJ2

Hi, the correct answer is B

well no because we dont know what the systems are so tell me the systems and i can answer your question

Answer:

Both gerrymandering and the pork barrel systems are not fair in a country that considers itself to be fully democratic.

Chief of State, Chief Executive, Chief Diplomat, Commander-In-Chief, Legislative Leader, Chief of Party, Guardian of the Economy.

Commander-In-Chief would give a lot of power since it would allow the president to start war with practically any country.

The president has equal power to the other branches of the government. Every decision goes through the government branches and each one has equal say. They are always balanced in power.

Maybe Chief Administrator and Chief Diplomat would come into conflict debating foreign policy regarding federal government’s jurisdiction. Implications? They may not be at odds with each other exactly, but in some way it is very possible.

The president plays seven roles, with the role of Chief Executive giving them the most power. The appropriate balance of presidential power is subjective and depends on various factors. Conflicts between roles can arise, requiring the president to navigate their responsibilities carefully.

The seven roles that the president plays include:

The role that gives the president the most power is the role of Chief Executive. This role allows the president to enforce laws, manage the executive branch, and make important decisions.

Whether the president of the United States has too much power, just the right amount of power, or too little power is a subjective question. It depends on individual perspectives and beliefs. However, one must consider the checks and balances system, the role of Congress, and the constraints of the Constitution in determining the appropriate balance of presidential power.

An example where roles could be at odds is when the president acts as Chief Legislator, proposing and advocating for new policies, while also serving as Chief Diplomat to negotiate treaties and agreements with other countries. This could create tension if the proposed policies conflict with the goals of the diplomatic negotiations.

The implications of such conflicts between roles are that the president must carefully navigate and prioritize their responsibilities to ensure effective governance and avoid conflicts of interest or contradictory actions.

https://brainly.com/question/34824563

#SPJ6

The answer is Check for style and tone.

Hope this helps!

The second alternative is correct (B).

Alternatives (A), (C) and (D) are essential in an argumentative essay.

The author needs to have a clear and objective argument that is evidence-based and project completion must be striking.

However, the exercise asks about the review process, which is the time to make sure that the style and the argumentative tone are framed with the evidence and the conclusion, that is, it is a verification of the harmony of the argumentative essay.

Francisco Pizarro (1478-1571) was an Spanish colonizer that conquered the Inca Empire, in the current territory of Peru, after killing their emperor Atahualpa and the Inca lands were put under the control of the Spanish Empire.

After that he was named the governor of the Governorate of New Castile.

The answer is: The Peruvians, more specifically, The Incas.

In 1532 he managed to defeat the Incas, their leader being at the time Atahualpa, and conquer Peru, where three years later he founded the new capital city of Lima.

Hope this helps!

Between 1820 and 1840 there was a huge growth in immigration. With higher population the demand of homes, jobs and basic necessities also grew causing an out demand of these supplies, making these people to go homeless.

The jobs available for this (pronounced) amount of people paid very small salaries, making the people to become poor. The year 1843 came with the birth of the New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor, which aimed to help people in these conditions.  The Randall’s Island Nursery was very famous. It provided the children with food, water and where to live. These children were mainly orphaned and abandoned by parents who couldn’t afford to provide their children with a better life. The homeless also were assisted by social programs such as asylums. Charles Loring Brace was of huge importance in this and in the creation of the Children’s Aid Society. In the 1870’s a pronounced economic depression hugely affected the society (with the most vulnerable facing the worst part) causing the people to lost homes and jobs. Many families were assisted by the Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor in the years 1873 and 1874.

The second half of 1800, however, was also a period of expansion, population growth and economic prosperity for many. Industrialization and unrestrained capitalism were key factors for American Society’s development. Private Capital and investment shaped economic growth (the low government restrictions were very important for this) and big industries, banks, and corporations were built.  Investors such as John D. Rockefeller (oil), John Jacob Astor (real estate) and J.P Morgan (banking) were key figures of growth in stock market.

The correct options are a, c and d. To evaluate a source's relevance, consider bias, main idea, and author's background.

When evaluating the relevance and importance of a source, your friend should consider the following

a Bias: Evaluating bias helps identify subjective influences that may impact the source's objectivity and credibility, crucial for assessing its relevance.

c Main Idea: Understanding the main idea provides insight into the source's central argument or perspective, aiding in determining its relevance to the topic.

d Author's Background: Examining the author's background offers insights into their expertise, credibility, and potential biases, aiding in assessing the source's relevance and importance.

The incorrect option is B. Assessing generalizations determines the breadth of information presented rather than its relevance to the topic, which is crucial for evaluating its importance. This option may not directly impact the source's relevance or importance to the topic.

The complete question is

Your friend asks for your help examining research documents. You tell your friend it is necessary to determine the relevance and importance of a source to the topic. What should your friend evaluate in each source to begin this process?

A. bias

B. generalizations

C. main idea

D. author’s background

how the other lives, i believe

Your Answer would be

The Euro is the currency used by 27 countries and is a dominant currency in foreign exchange markets, second to the U.S. dollar.So,option B is correct.

Twenty-seven countries use the Euro as their currency. The Euro is one of the most commonly traded currencies on the foreign exchange markets, being second only to the U.S. dollar in terms of volume. The global economy sees a wide variety of currencies for international economic transactions, with individuals and firms often needing to convert from one currency to another for travel, business, or trade purposes.

fifth is your correct

William Berkley was a Virginia governor . He wanted to make a pledge that the native americans would a large tracts of land (exchange for settlers). He tried to promote peace by preventing war with the Native Americans.

Conflict between settlers and Native Americans in Virginia primarily arose from disagreements over land and wealth. Governor William Berkeley tried to promote peace by signing treaties with local Native groups and discouraging unnecessary territorial expansion. The conflict could have been resolved through mutual respect of land, involving Natives in decision-making, and strict adherence to agreed treaties.

The settlers and Native Americans in Virginia went into conflict due to various factors including land acquisition, pursuit of wealth, and cultural misunderstandings. The settlers, mainly British colonists, encroached on the territories of Native American tribes like the Algonquin-speaking Powhatan Confederacy and the Susquehannock, leading to wars. The colonists' lust for new, fertile land for farming tobacco pushed them deeper into native territories, igniting more conflicts such as Bacon's Rebellion.

Virginia's royal governor, William Berkeley, attempted to keep peace by signing treaties with local Native peoples, taking a stand against unnecessary territorial expansion, and advocating for harmony. Yet, his efforts were undermined by aggressive settlers who saw the natives as obstacles to their quest for land and wealth. Despite the conflict, some settlers, such as Bacon, defied Governor Berkeley's peace policy, leading to civil war. Berkeley attempted to quell rebellion by arresting rebellious figures, but his attempts often resulted in further conflict.

Conflict resolution could have been achieved via diplomatic sharing and respect for the resource-rich land, better integration of natives into decision-making processes, and more strict adherence to treaties by both colonists and Natives. A change of attitude towards Native Americans, considering them as allies rather than obstacles, might have eased the tensions as well.

https://brainly.com/question/37889268

#SPJ2

The Emancipation Proclamation was issued by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, as the country was approaching its third year of a deadly civil war.

The declaration said "that all persons held as slaves" in the rebelling states "are, and henceforward shall be free." The North did not prioritize the abolition of slavery until the Civil War had already lasted a full year.

Despite a vociferous anti-slavery campaign in the North, a large majority of people—particularly a large number of soldiers—opposed slavery but opposed emancipation. They anticipated that slavery would eventually end on its own.

Learn more about emancipation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13741805

#SPJ2

Final answer:

Emancipation in the North was carried out through state constitutional bans, legal actions, and laws for gradual emancipation beginning in the 1770s and culminating with Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. However, even after emancipation, the free black community faced discrimination and prejudice.

Explanation:

The emancipation of slaves in the North was a gradual and complex process, influenced by ideological shifts and economic needs. Initially, the revolutionary spirit of the late 18th century, which emphasized freedom and liberty, pushed Northern states to address the contradiction of slavery within their territories. States such as Pennsylvania and Vermont began the movement by including bans on slavery in their state constitutions in the 1770s. Following this, Massachusetts and New Hampshire significantly reduced slavery through court actions, demonstrating a commitment to this ideological shift.

Gradual emancipation laws were then passed in Connecticut and Rhode Island in the early 1780s, with states like New York and New Jersey implementing similar laws by the late 1790s. The Emancipation Proclamation later became a pivotal moment in the fight against slavery, with President Abraham Lincoln declaring all slaves in Confederate states to be free from January 1, 1863. However, this did not immediately apply to the loyal Border States or the new territories. While the proclamation was met with a mix of reactions, it undeniably marked a turning point in the road to full emancipation.

Despite these changes, freed slaves faced continuous prejudice and discrimination in the North. Opposition to slavery was not always driven by moral considerations but also by economic interests and racial biases. For the slaves and free black community, emancipation in the North was only the beginning of a long and challenging path towards equality and true freedom.

Answer:

Sundiata Keita

Explanation:

Option D) Sundiata Keita  was the founder and Uniter of the Mali Empire.

Sundiata Keita was the founder of the Mali Empire in West Africa. He ruled from 1235 to 1255 AD, establishing the Mali Empire as the dominant force in the region.

Sundiata was born around 1217 AD. His mother, Sogoron, was the second wife of King Magan of Mali. Growing up, Sundiata was ridiculed as crippled. He was too weak to walk. However, King Magan loved and protected Sundiata. This made the king's first wife, Sassma, jealous of Sundiata and his mother. She wanted to make her son Touman king one day.

                 When Sundiata was three years old, the king died. Sundiata's brother-in-law, Touman, became king. Touman treated Sundiata badly, made fun of him, and constantly chose him.

When Sundiata was a child, Mali was a fairly small kingdom. When he was a child, Soso conquered Mali and took control. Sundiata became a prisoner of Soso and lived with the leader of Soso.

Learn more about Sundiata Keita here: https://brainly.com/question/17193632

#SPJ2

Everything execpt F. Hope i helped

All of it except for F.

Thats what I think 2