Match the following items. 1. combatant the practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from an incurable condition 2. collaborator compensation demanded by the victor from its vanquished foe 3. euthanasia to cooperate, usually willingly, with an enemy nation 4. reparation a person that takes part in armed strife

Answer:  Many Germans believed the treaty was unfair and humiliating, and Hitler used their anger to gain support.

Explanation/details:

The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles put Germany in a situation that allowed the rise of Hitler and the Nazis, leading to World War II.

The Treaty of Versailles, which came out of the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, was very punitive towards Germany.  Germany was forced to admit responsibility for causing the Great War (World War I).  We now call that "the war guilt" clause of the treaty.  Germany also was forced to pay large reparation payments to the Allies (who opposed Germany in the war).   Germany also had to give up large portions of its territory and lost colonial territories.  And the German military had major restrictions imposed on it -- it had to be a volunteer military only, of no more than 100,000 men, and they could not have an air force.

The German economy and national pride were deeply wounded by the terms imposed by the Treaty of Versailles.  Coupled with that, the Great Depression (which had worldwide impact) made the economic situation even worse.  The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.  Hitler promised a return to national greatness and fiercely rebuilt Germany as a military machine.  The rise of Hitler and the Nazis brought about World War II in Europe.

The correct answer is D) It stated that the right of public school students to publish content in school-sponsored newspapers is not protected by the First Amendment.

The statement that is true about the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier is "It stated that the right of public school students to publish content in school-sponsored newspapers is not protected by the First Amendment.

We are talking about the Supreme Court case "Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier" that was decided on January 13, 1988. The Supreme Court decided that the school's Principal decision of not publishing the articles of the students in the "Spectrum," the newspaper of the school, did not violate the student's rights under the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court ruling in the Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier case affirmatively stated that the right of public school students to publish content in school-sponsored newspapers is not protected unconditionally by the First Amendment.

The correct answer is D. It stated that the right of public school students to publish content in school-sponsored newspapers is not protected by the First Amendment. In the Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier case, the Supreme Court ruled that school administrators could exercise editorial control over the content of student-published newspapers, as long as their actions are related to legitimate pedagogical concerns. This means that the First Amendment rights of students in public schools are not absolute and can be limited.

https://brainly.com/question/32829771

#SPJ3

Final answer:

The voyages of Zheng He during the Ming dynasty benefited China in several ways, establishing its power, facilitating trade relationships, and allowing for the exchange of goods and cultures.

Explanation:

The voyages of Zheng He during the Ming dynasty benefited China in several ways. Firstly, these expeditions helped to establish China as a powerful economic nation in Asia and the center of the civilized world. By demanding tributes from other nations, China gained access to valuable trade relationships. Additionally, Zheng He's voyages allowed the Ming dynasty to demonstrate its wealth and power to foreign rulers, prompting them to offer tribute and recognize China's dominance. The expeditions also facilitated the exchange of goods, ideas, and cultures between China and other regions.

Answer:

Sorry for being late, i think the answer might be "Georgia" Because that one has the color of "15 - 25" percent

The answer to the fill in the blank is Select Committee

The Senate Watergate Committee was an example of a Select Committee.

The Senate Watergate Committee was setup to investigate the 1973 President Richard Nixon scandal.

Till date, it was one of the most controversial moments in the history of US politics and was responsible for the eventual impeachment of President Richard Nixon.

Final answer:

A major challenge for former slaves after abolition was economic dependency on former slave owners, as many freed slaves worked for low wages on their former owners' lands due to limited opportunities.

Explanation:

The statement that best describes a major challenge facing former slaves after the abolition of slavery in the United States is: Many freed slaves had no choice but to work for low wages on their former owners' lands. This was a consequence of the systemic limitations that prevented full participation in society and the economy for African Americans. After the Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, the economic structures and discriminatory laws limited the opportunities for freed slaves, often resulting in sharecropping and tenant farming, which kept them in poverty and economically dependent on their former owners.

Answer:

The answer is A & D

The Judicial Branch

The Judicial Branch, as a guardian and interpreter of the laws stated in the Constitution, often has the responsibility to interpret the proper extension of the other branches, including the presidential powers, as well as to tell if the president violates a law based on the Constitution.

Example: Let's suppose the President decides to declare war on a country and spread it to media. The Judicial branch is the one to formally denounce that his actions are unconstitutional since it is the Legislative Branch's responsibility of doing so.

The Judicial Branch, particularly the Supreme Court, interprets the proper extent of presidential powers. Historical examples include the Marbury v. Madison case which cemented the judiciary's power to review and possibly declare laws unconstitutional. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has often interpreted the scope of presidential war powers during times of conflict.

The Judicial Branch, specifically the Supreme Court, has often been charged with interpreting the proper extent of presidential powers. The Supreme Court has been providing interpretations on presidential powers over the course of U.S. history. This is typically done through court cases that challenge the extent and usage of presidential powers.

One example of the Supreme Court interpreting presidential power was in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803). This case established the judiciary's authority over judicial review, giving the courts, primarily the Supreme Court, the power to deem laws unconstitutional. Since that decision, the Supreme Court has become more inclined to check presidential powers

Another example is how the Supreme Court has interpreted the presidential war powers during times of conflict. For instance, during the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln's issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation stretching his legal authority, was an issue of consideration under the court's interpretation of presidential powers.

https://brainly.com/question/7194691

#SPJ3

The New Deal Era under President Roosevelt aimed to combat the Great Depression through innovative programs and reforms, significantly impacting American society and the economy.

The New Deal Era refers to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's response to the Great Depression in the 1930s, aiming to stimulate the economy and provide relief to Americans. This initiative included programs like the Works Progress Administration (WPA) and the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) that aimed to create jobs and improve infrastructure.

One of the key features of the New Deal was the implementation of social safety net programs like Social Security and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to protect citizens from economic hardships. Despite criticisms, the New Deal era marked a significant shift in government intervention in the economy to address the challenges faced during the Great Depression.

President Roosevelt's bold plans during the New Deal era helped elevate millions out of poverty, provided relief to the unemployed, and instilled hope in a nation grappling with the economic crisis of the 1930s.

Answer:

To Discuss the Article of confederation.

Explanation:

In 1787, The Delegates gathered in "Philadelphia" to overthrow the new American government by the non-violent method as defined in the article of confederation.

This gathering is also known as the constitutional convention, "George Washington" headed this convention at this meeting it was decided that the young country is dealing with new problems which were kept aside as the "article of confederation" and should write the "new constitution".

Each state has its different view some states wants a "strong center" while some states are against it.

Answer:

Sumer civilization is the answer.

Explanation:

The Sumer Civilization arose in the mentioned area (along the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers) around 4,000 befor Christ. Niniveh was one of its main cities, located where we can find Iraq nowadays. Even though the origins of this civilization is not clear, many historians point out that they had stablished around ten to twelve cities by 4,000 B. C.

Despite the way the question is phrased, history records no significant meeting between Henri de Saint-Simon and Louis XIV as they lived in different centuries. It would be helpful if the Saint-Simon and Louis being referred to could be made clear.

It appears there might be some confusion in the question as there are no historic records indicating a significant meeting between Saint-Simon and Louis XIV. Henri de Saint-Simon was a French political and economic theorist whose ideas had influence on the development of socialism, while Louis XIV was the King of France much earlier, known for his autocratic rule. As the two lived in different centuries, it seems unlikely a meeting could have occurred.

However, if you're referring to a different Saint-Simon or Louis, it'd be helpful to clarify. For example, there was a Louis de Rouvroy, duc de Saint-Simon, who was a French statesman and writer known for his comprehensive memoirs of Louis XIV's court and the Regency.

https://brainly.com/question/8860367

#SPJ12

There's no historical record of an audience between Saint-Simon and Louis XIV. Saint-Simon's writings provide valuable insights into Louis XIV's reign, who changed France into an absolute monarchy and patronized arts significantly.

Currently, there is no historical record indicating that Saint-Simon had an audience with Louis XIV. However, Saint-Simon's writings provide valuable insight into the reign of Louis XIV. Louis XIV, also known as the 'Sun King', turned France into an absolute monarchy. He chose to rule absolutely, without convening with his advisory body, the Estates General. His reign witnessed significant changes in French arts, including the construction of large public theatres and the inclusion of women as onstage performers.

https://brainly.com/question/33926063

#SPJ12

Which cash crops were the most successful in the international interdependence system?

Cotton, corn, squash, hemp

Indigo, cotton, rice, tobacco <--- This one

Indigo, corn, potatoes, rum

Tobacco, corn, rice, pumpkins

B. IS THE CORRECT ANSWER

Family structure mimic is termed as the rediculous humor regarding the family composition. The family structure is formed by forming the number of members in the particular family. It includes all the relatives and friends. The family structure has been imitated with the government of ancient china.

The government of ancient china was like parents. They guide the population in the form of parents of the family. They started this with guidance and instructions to the children of China regarding their future aspects and then continued this technique on most population of China.

To know more about the family structure mimic with the government of ancient China. refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/10336713

The answer on APEX is D. Some Christian beliefs inspired indigenous peoples to fight back against imperial powers.

cause it was to mass of territory and didnt have enough ppl also they were dealinmg with the indigunous

I  think that Spain came to believe that keeping Florida was impossible, may be  this was because they thought they were not prepared for this. Spain did not have enough people also they were dealing with the natives.

The term "natives" can refer to various groups of people depending on the context. Generally, the term refers to people who are indigenous to a particular region or area, meaning they are the original inhabitants of that place.

In some contexts, "natives" may refer specifically to the Indigenous peoples of a particular region or country, such as the Native Americans in the United States, the Maori in New Zealand, or the Inuit in Canada.

I  think that at that time Spain came to believe that keeping Florida was impossible because the Spain did not have enough people and also they were dealing with the natives also.

Learn more about natives here:

https://brainly.com/question/12257940

#SPJ2

The rider attached to the Indian Appropriations Act of 1889 gave the United States government the right to open the Unassigned Lands for settlement.

The Indian Appropriations Act of 1889 was a piece of legislation that had a significant impact on the history of the United States, particularly concerning the settlement of the western territories. A rider is an additional provision added to a bill or act that is not necessarily related to the original purpose of the legislation. In the case of the Indian Appropriations Act of 1889, the rider in question was added to allow for the opening of the Unassigned Lands, which were areas in what is now Oklahoma that had not been assigned to any Native American tribe.

The Unassigned Lands were originally set aside for Native American resettlement, but with the rider attached to the act, the United States government was given the authority to open these lands for non-Native American settlement. This event is often referred to as the Oklahoma Land Rush or the Land Run of 1889. The rider effectively ended the previous policy of setting aside these lands exclusively for Native Americans and marked a significant shift in U.S. policy towards the Native American tribes.

The opening of the Unassigned Lands led to a significant influx of settlers into the area, and the establishment of new towns and communities, which contributed to the eventual statehood of Oklahoma in 1907. The rider and the subsequent land rush are important historical events that reflect the broader themes of westward expansion and the displacement of Native American peoples during the late 19th century in the United States.

President Andrew Jackson was a proponent of limited government and was opposed to the central government becoming too strong. He saw the Bank of the U.S as an example of such overreach and sought to prevent a strong centrally run bank