Match the work to the author. 1. The Real World Theodore Dreiser 2. Growth Thornton Wilder 3. Ethan Frome Thomas Wolfe 4. They Stooped to Folly Willa Cather 5. The American Tragedy Edith Wharton 6. Death Comes to the Archbishop Sinclair Lewis 7. Babbitt Ellen Glasgow 8. The Bridge of San Luis Rey Robert Herrick 9. Of Time and the River John Steinbeck 10. The Pearl Booth Tarkington

Answer: Because of his youth, his captors feared he might not otherwise survive.

Answer:

Comparison in writing discusses elements that are similar, while contrast in writing discusses elements that are different. A compare-and-contrast essay, then, analyzes two subjects by comparing them, contrasting them, or both.

The key to a good compare-and-contrast essay is to choose two or more subjects that connect in a meaningful way. The purpose of conducting the comparison or contrast is not to state the obvious but rather to illuminate subtle differences or unexpected similarities. For example, if you wanted to focus on contrasting two subjects you would not pick apples and oranges; rather, you might choose to compare and contrast two types of oranges or two types of apples to highlight subtle differences. For example, Red Delicious apples are sweet, while Granny Smiths are tart and acidic. Drawing distinctions between elements in a similar category will increase the audience’s understanding of that category, which is the purpose of the compare-and-contrast essay.

Similarly, to focus on comparison, choose two subjects that seem at first to be unrelated. For a comparison essay, you likely would not choose two apples or two oranges because they share so many of the same properties already. Rather, you might try to compare how apples and oranges are quite similar. The more divergent the two subjects initially seem, the more interesting a comparison essay will be.

The Structure of a Compare/Contrast Essay

The compare-and-contrast essay starts with a thesis that clearly states the two subjects that are to be compared, contrasted, or both and the reason for doing so. The thesis could lean more toward comparing, contrasting, or both. Remember, the point of comparing and contrasting is to provide useful knowledge to the reader. Take the following thesis as an example that leans more toward contrasting:

Thesis Statement: Organic vegetables may cost more than those that are conventionally grown, but when put to the test, they are definitely worth every extra penny.

Here the thesis sets up the two subjects to be compared and contrasted (organic versus conventional vegetables), and it makes a claim about the results that might prove useful to the reader.

You may organize compare-and-contrast essays in one of the following two ways:

According to the subjects themselves, discussing one then the other

According to individual points, discussing each subject in relation to each point

The organizational structure you choose depends on the nature of the topic, your purpose, and your audience.

Given that compare-and-contrast essays analyze the relationship between two subjects, it is helpful to have some phrases on hand that will cue the reader to such analysis.

Explanation: it worked for me:>

To compare and contrast 'THE DARK GAME' and 'THE COPY GAMES,' identify thematic similarities and analyze how the two texts approach these themes differently. Use both summary and in-depth analysis focused on elements like character, setting, and style. The goal is to reveal deeper insights into the texts through comparison.

To craft a compare-and-contrast analysis of 'THE DARK GAME' and 'THE COPY GAMES,' consider the texts' exploration of similar themes but through different narrative techniques and character portrayals. Identifying the thematic overlaps allows for a focused analysis of how each text approaches these themes. The structure of this analysis could involve outlining the similarities that unify the texts and then delving into the nuanced differences, discussing how each contributes to a deeper understanding of the themes.

In your essay, you might use critical reading strategies to engage with the texts and highlight their connections and disconnections. Provide a balanced examination with both summary and analysis—emphasis should be placed on analysis to offer insight into the works. Discuss specifics, such as character development, setting, plot structure, and the authors' literary styles, and consider how these elements compare and contrast across the two texts.

Finally, your analysis should reveal something insightful about the texts, perhaps by highlighting unexpected revelations that emerge from the comparison. The goal is not only to list similarities and differences but also to interpret how these elements forge a deeper comprehension of the literature and its themes.

https://brainly.com/question/32841106

#SPJ3

Answer:

Heat

Explanation:

The choice that a translator make that can affective tone and pacing of a story is D. how to order the words

Pace, also known as pacing, in literature refers to the speed at which a story is told, not necessarily the speed at which the story actually occurs. The amount of words required to describe a specific event depends on the significance of that moment in the story, not how long it takes for the event to occur.

Pacing is the reader's perception of how quickly or slowly the story is progressing. This depends on how long a scene is and how quickly you, as the writer, convey information.

Learn more about tone on:

https://brainly.com/question/12176973

#SPJ1

Answer:

“And let every other power know that this Hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house.”

Explanation:

This is the passage from Kennedy’s inaugural address that is a metaphor. A metaphor is a figure of speech that directly refers to one thing by mentioning another one. It allows us to make a comparison between two unlike objects. In this sentence, Kennedy compares a region with a house, and its people with the master of the house, in order to convey the importance of self-government and self-determination.

The earth-diver is a common character in various traditional creation myths. In these stories a supreme being usually sends an animal into the primal waters to find bits of sand or mud with which to build habitable land.

The answer is actually D) A hoaxer causes people to spread a made-up story that they believe is true.

The statement is the best explanation of how a hoax works is A hoaxer causes people to spread a made-up story that they believe is true. Thus the correct option is D.

A hoax is a widespread misconception that originates in a particular area. Fraud is commonly committed by many people. In other terms, a hoax occurs when an individual or group of individuals willfully portrays a lie as the truth.

The public takes the falsehood to be true since it is regularly spread and the propagandists act confidently. A topic getting presented to the public's attention is perceived as a joke or as an attempt to promote social or political change.

The phrase designates characteristics among the possibilities as people believing a made-up story to be true based on the information provided signifies the attributes of Hoax.

Therefore, option D is appropriate.

Read more on hoaxes, here:

brainly.com/question/10942537

#SPJ7

In “Importance of being Ernest, A Trivial Comedy for Serious People”, a play written by Oscar Wilde, the epigram in Algernon’s last line is used to make a critique of married life. Oscar Wilde used epigrams, a short remark expressing an idea in a clever and amusing way, to criticize the moral of Victorian era.

Answer:

C. Critique of married life

Explanation:

Edge 2021

Answer:

The ghost of Hamlet's father instructs him no to do any harm to his mother.

Explanation:

During Act 1, Scene 5 of the play "Hamlet" , by William Shakespeare, the ghost of Hamlet's father appears to Hamlet and reveals the gruesome details of the circumstances of his death. While the ghost instructs Hamlet to take revenge on current king Claudius for his murder, he also tells him to refrain himself from doing any harm to his mother, Gertrude, by telling him to "Leave her to heaven  and to those thorns that in her bosom lodge  to pick and sting her."

This way, the ghost tells Hamlet to leave his mother's judgement to heaven and to her own guilt.

The ghost of Hamlet's father asks him to seek revenge for his murder, but explicitly tells Hamlet not to harm his mother, Gertrude. The ghost says that her fate will ultimately be decided in heaven.

In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, the ghost of Hamlet's father instructs him to avenge his murder, but also warns Hamlet not to harm his mother. The ghost tells Hamlet that his mother, Gertrude, is to face her own reckoning in heaven and it is not Hamlet's place to punish her for her sins. As such, the ghost is instructing Hamlet to leave his mother out of his schemes of revenge against his Uncle Claudius, the person who murdered the ghost.

https://brainly.com/question/34217315

#SPJ6

The given lines from the poem mock the epic convention of the genealogy of a hero's weapon by humorously tracing the lineage of an ordinary bodkin through various mundane transformations.

The lines presented gently mock the epic convention of the genealogy of the weapon. The mock-heroic tone of the poem uses grand, epic language to describe the lineage of a rather ordinary object, a bodkin (a small, sharp instrument). The poem humorously traces the bodkin's history through its various transformations from seal-rings to a buckle, a whistle, and finally a hair accessory, thus parodying the tradition in epic poetry of tracing the noble lineage of a hero's weapon.

It can be deduced that the impact of the chronological narrative sequence is C. It allows the reader to follow along as a typical day brings one abuse after another.

It should be noted that the chronological narrative sequence is important as it allows the readers to understand the story due to the arrangement.

In this case, the impact of the chronological narrative sequence is that it allows the reader to follow along as a typical day brings one abuse after another.

Learn more about narrative on:

https://brainly.com/question/5962406

True

Dialogue certainly is the best method to use when analyzing a character because we can learn so much.  Let’s say you are reading a story where the main character reads a sign a person standing on a street corner is holding that says, “Can you spare some change?”  After reading that sign, the main character walks up to that person and yells in his face, “Why don’t you go get a job!?”  What can be learned from this interaction?  What can be deciphered from this is that the main character is insensitive to the plights of others and apparently incapable (or unwilling) to see things objectively and from a perspective other than his own so much so that he jumps to conclusions and feels the person is just lazy when, in fact, the person may have just recently lost a job, has bills that need immediate paying, and/or is perhaps waiting for unemployment benefits to become active while looking for a new job.  As you can see, thus, dialogue can be quite useful in analyzing a character.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Dialogue reveals all the nuances, complexity and individual features that are specific of a certain character.  

The words that they use, how they express to others, their accent, opinions, language or jargon are all essential elements used to convey the psychology, motives, and traits of a character.

D) “the rhetorical questions imply that a harsher sentence would only serve to make people crueler.”

Proof...

- R3KTFORGOOD ☕

The correct answer is C. The rhetorical questions demonstrate that the speaker is offering theories, not stating facts.

Rhetorical Questions in Legal Arguments:

Used to provoke thought and emphasize points without expecting direct answers.

Aims to subtly influence the judge's thinking and lead them to a conclusion.

Option Analysis:

A: Engages the listener but doesn't compel agreement. Provokes reflection rather than forcing agreement.

B: Correct. Demonstrates the speaker is offering theories, not stating facts. Rhetorical questions propose ideas for consideration, effective in persuasive contexts.

C: Implies common viewpoints but doesn't show community consensus. Guides judge's thoughts without providing public opinion evidence.

D: Suggests consequences but doesn't directly state them. Questions the effectiveness or morality of a harsh sentence rather than implying a direct causal relationship.

Conclusion:

Rhetorical questions advance the speaker's purpose by suggesting theories or viewpoints for the judge to consider.

Allows persuasion without presenting hard evidence, shaping the judge's perspective on the case.

Answer: Answer is A

Explanation:

Rising action is a series of related events something that builds to themain point or "meat" of the story, paragraph, or text.

D. Cause/Effect

When looking to explain the reasons why something happened, you’ll be looking into the “causes” of the “effect.”  The link between two or more things where an element or elements are the outcome of the occurrence of something else that came before it.  Here is the concept simplified.

Cause = why something happened (this can be singular or plural—“cause” or “causes”)

Effect = the thing that happened

It’s important to note that even though a cause will happen first, it doesn’t necessarily need to appear first in a sentence, paragraph, or paper.  For instance, “I was tired because I stayed up too late.”  Here, we see the effect of being tired coming first followed by the cause of staying up late, which is why I was tired.

Answer:

  Cause/effect.

Explanation:

  Cause and effect is a way to organize information in a text. They explain the reasons why something happened in an easy presentation. Sometimes they´re ordered as first causes and then, effects, and other times could be read first the effects and then the causes.

  This text structure is usually used in expository and persuasive writing modes.

  I hope this answer helps you.

When utilizing words within a sentence, we must first recognize two things: their definition and the ways that they can be used. As such, when we have these elements, we can generate sentences that not only use them correctly, but through these sentences we can further understand the meaning of the words through context. Defy, as per the dictionary, means to disobey an order, or challenge someone or something and unequal means not being able, or not having the resources, to deal with someone or a situation, or also, a variation in size, shape or other characteristics that make two things differ and one be superior to the other.

As such, a good sentence to combine these two words could be thus: We have always been unequal to the task of dealing with corrupt people because we fear to defy those who we perceive have power and control over us.

An example of the two words being used in a sentence could be:

"All the heroes of the Civil Rights movement had a thing in common: they did not accept the fact that injustice was necessary. They wanted to change the world, and I will too. Whenever someone tells me that the natural state of society is for humans to be unequal, I will defy this view."

Answer:

The correct answer is option D "She knowingly disobeyed an unjust law".

Explanation:

Thoreau's 1849 "Civil Disobedience", is one of the most widely known essays about not following the law as an act to protest. Thoreau expressed is decision to not pay taxes to protest against slavery. Rosa Parks followed Thoreau's ideas and fought for equality in The United States by refusing to give hear seat to a white man in 1955. By doing this, Rosa Parks knowingly disobeyed an unjust law and started the civil rights movement in the United States

Answer:

D. She knowingly disobeyed an unjust law.

Explanation:

In "Civil Disobedience," Thoreau argues that a moral person is obliged to follow his principles and values. This is necessary for everyone, regardless of the commandments that other people give him. Therefore, if a person has a belief that opposes the law, he should follow his values, and not the law, because the law is unjust. This is similar to the situation Rosa Parks saw herself in. She knew that it was unjust for buses to be segregated, and even though this was the law, she decided to follow her principles and act against it.

Answer:

I believe its C

C) a problem is presented, followed by a suggested solution

Explanation:

Im taking the test now

The author openly states a character’s traits.