How much sovereignty should Canada give up for the sake of internationalism?
The amount of sovereignty Canada should give up for internationalism depends on its balance between preserving its national autonomy, particularly for Indigenous peoples, and its willingness to collaborate globally and contribute towards global governance. This balance is influenced by various socio-economic, political, and cultural factors.
Explanation:The amount of sovereignty Canada should give up for the sake of internationalism is subjective and depends on a variety of factors. For instance, Canadian Indigenous people see self-government as a way to preserve their culture and assert greater control over their lands and resources. This view is backed by the Canadian Constitution and was acknowledged by the federal government in 1995.
On the other hand, a 2015-2016 BBC poll indicated that more than half the respondents across eighteen countries identified as 'global citizens,' particularly in times of prosperity. This suggests that there is merit in surrendering some degree of sovereignty for the pursuit of international community and global unity, notably in prosperous times.
Finally, the principle of state sovereignty in the international system can present challenges in persuading states to act collaboratively on shared issues. Global governance helps to provide public goods while respecting the principle of state sovereignty. So, the question depends on the balance between national autonomy and worldwide collaboration that Canada wishes to strike.
Learn more about Canada's sovereignty and internationalism here:https://brainly.com/question/10077371
#SPJ3
Bill was admitted to the hospital last week after he fell. when bill's son visited, he found his father was unable to form words without great difficulty. if bill's difficulty speaking is due to brain damage, what is the likely location of the damage?
Why does the U.S. Constitution include the Bill of Rights? A. U.S. leaders wanted a separate document for constitutional amendments. B. The Bill of Rights explains the purpose of the U.S. Constitution. C. The founding fathers want to guarantee citizens certain freedoms. D. Many leaders wanted a document that stated the government's rights.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Denise is in her mid-40s; she is not married and is childless. her job is routine and she feels as if she has not really done much to contribute to society's future. in erikson's terms, denise is in the ________ stage.
Denise is in the intimacy versus Isolation stage
This stage is the stage where they orient themselves towards their work and life partner. This period grows ability by a willingness to merge with others, without feeling afraid of losing something that is in itself called intimacy.
Further explanation
Erik Erikson is a psychologist from Germany. According to Erikson psychosocial development is based on the epigenetic principle that human development is divided into several stages and each stage must have an optimal or critical period that must be developed and resolved.
Psychosocial itself is a relationship between one's mental health and social conditions. This term is a combination of psychology and social. Thus the meaning of psychosocial development is development related to one's emotions in dealing with others. So, psychosocial development is a change in personality related to social relations.
Psychosocial progression worsening Erikson is divided into 8 stages, including the following:
1. Basic Trust versus Basic Suspicion. (continued age 0-1 years)
2. Autonomy versus Feelings of Shame and Doubt. (continuation of age 2-3 years)
3. Initiative (takes place at 4 years old)
4. Craft versus Inferiority (lasting 6-11 years)
5. Identity versus identity disorder (lasting 12-20 years)
6. Intimacy versus Isolation (takes place at the age of 20-24 years)
7. Generativity versus stagnation (lasting 25 - 45 years)
8. Integrity versus despair (lasting above 65 years)
Learn more
Psychosocial https://brainly.com/question/5910285
Erik Erikson https://brainly.com/question/10916434
Details
Class: High School
Subject: Social studies
Keyword: Erik Erikson, Psychosocial.
Researchers suggest that nonviolent movements may be twice as likely to succeed as violent ones, even against repressive regimes. what is their reason?
Nonviolent movements are twice as likely to succeed because more common individuals will join the movement and guarantee its definitive achievement and acknowledgment.
Nonviolent movement is the act of accomplishing objectives, for example, social change through representative challenges, common defiance, monetary or political noncooperation, satyagraha, or different techniques, while being peaceful.
An associate asks for your assistance in completing a task that she should be able to handle herself. you are very busy with your own work. your best response would be: