Answer:
Container size = 52
Number of kanbans required ≈ 7 kanbans
Explanation:
Given the data in the question, to find the Kanban container size, we calculate the economic order quantity (EOQ) using the formula below :
[tex]EOQ = \sqrt{(2*annual usage A*setup cost S)/annual holding cost H}[/tex]
Where
Annual usage A = 4500
Setup cost S = $30
Annual holding cost H = $100
Container size = √{(2×4500×30)÷100} = √2700 = 51.96 ≈ 52
Container size = 52
Number of Kanbans required = (demand during lead time + safety stock) / container size
Where:
Demand during lead time = lead time (16) * daily usage (18)
Demand during lead time = 16*18 = 288
Safety stock = 2 days production, where daily production is 25 subassemblies.
Safety stock = 2*25 = 50 units
Container size = 52 units
Imputing the data into the equation, we obtain :
Number of kanbans required = (288 + 50)/52 = 338/50 = 6.5
Number of kanbans required ≈ 7 kanbans
Safety stock is a word used by logicians to define a quantity of additional stock kept on hand to avoid stock outs due to supply and demand fluctuations.
Container size = 52Number of kanbans required ≈ 7 kanbansGiven the data in the question, to find the Kanban container size, we calculate the economic order quantity (EOQ) using the formula below :
[tex]EOQ=\sqrt{(2*annualusage*setup cost)/annualholding cost}[/tex]
Where,
Annual usage A = 4500
Setup cost S = $30
Annual holding cost H = $100
Container size = √{(2×4500×30)÷100} = √2700 = 51.96 ≈ 52
Container size = 52
Number of Kanbans required = (demand during lead time + safety stock) / container size
Where,
Demand during lead time = lead time (16) * daily usage (18)
Demand during lead time = 16*18 = 288
Safety stock = 2 days production, where daily production is 25 sub assemblies.
Safety stock = 2*25 = 50 units
Container size = 52 units
Imputing the data into the equation, we obtain :
Number of kanbans required = (288 + 50)/52 = 338/50 = 6.5
Number of kanbans required ≈ 7 kanbans
To know more about safety stock, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/19132349
Linda is the director of HR at Colette Value Inc., a large tax-preparation firm. The firm faces a dearth of tax preparers every year when the tax season approaches. Every December, Linda outsources a bulk of the recruiting process to an employment agency to recruit temporary employees before the tax season begins. However, she wants to do so without excessively limiting her final hiring decisions. Which of the following processes of recruitment should Linda carry out first hand?
A) Advertising for recruitment over the Internet
B) Preliminary screening of résumés
C) Designing the employment advertisements
D) Face-to-face interviews with finalists
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Face-to-face interviews with finalists.
Explanation:
As Linda does not want to limit her hiring decision, she should let the employment agency to be in charge of the recruiting process but intervene in the face-to-face interviews with the finalists. In such a way, she will make sure that the agency is screening the correct applicants, and Linda, eventually, will have the final decision in the selection process.
On January 1, Grouper Corp. had 61,600 shares of no-par common stock issued and outstanding. The stock has a stated value of $4 per share. During the year, the following transactions occurred. Apr. 1 Issued 12,150 additional shares of common stock for $13 per share. June 15 Declared a cash dividend of $1.65 per share to stockholders of record on June 30. July 10 Paid the $1.65 cash dividend. Dec. 1 Issued 5,400 additional shares of common stock for $13 per share. Dec. 15 Declared a cash dividend on outstanding shares of $1.75 per share to stockholders of record on December 31. (a) Prepare the entries, if any, on each of the three dates that involved dividends.
Answer:
June 15
Dr Cash dividend 121,690
Cr Dividend payable 121,690
July 10
Dr Dividend payable 121,690
Cr Cash 121,690
Dec.15
Dr Cash dividend 138,513
Cr Dividend payable 138,513
Explanation:
Grouper Corp Journal entries
Date Accounts titles and Explanation Debit ($) Credit ($)
June 15
Dr Cash dividend 121,690
Cr Dividend payable 121,690
[($61,600+$12,150)*$1.65]
July 10
Dr Dividend payable 121,690
Cr Cash 121,690
Dec.15
Dr Cash dividend 138,513
Cr Dividend payable 138,513
[(61,600+12,150+5,400)*1.75]
Question 3: Sam’s Retails has the following data available as of 30 June 2019. Required: From the data, establish an income statement and a balance sheet
Sam’s Retails Data as of 30 June 2019
Sales
Administration expense Shop Lease
Cash at Bank
Costs of Good Sold Wages and salaries Accounts payables Miscellaneous Expense Land and buildings
542,000 1,500 24,000 175,000 274,000 38,500 15,050 2,500 127,000
Supplies expenses
Prepaid by a client for the company service Prepaid Insurance
Vehicles
Mortgage
Supplies
Account receivables
600 15,000 3,000 34,000 320,000 45,000 102,000
Note: Company income tax 30%, during the accounting period. The company has paid 2.5% of interest on the mortgage. Profit is retained for further investment
Answer:
Please refer explanation and attachment
Explanation:
The income statement has been provided in attachment 1 and balance sheet in attachment 2. Unfortunately, due to lack of information such as depreciation, lease details and mortgage payments, the balance could not be tallied. However, all information provided has been used to derive the results shown.
Ziegler Corporation reports net income of $380,000 and a weighted-average of 200,000 shares of common stock outstanding for the year. Compute the earnings per share of common stock
Answer:
$1.90 per share
Explanation:
The computation of the earning per share is shown below:
Earning per share = (Net income - preference dividend) ÷ (weighted-average of shares of common stock)
= ($380,000 - $0) ÷ (200,000 shares)
= $1.90 per share
By dividing the net income with the weighted average number of shares of common stock we can get the earning per share
Final answer:
To calculate the earnings per share for Ziegler Corporation, divide the net income of $380,000 by the 200,000 shares outstanding, giving an EPS of $1.90 per share. This figure aids investors in evaluating the company's per-share profitability and contributes to the P/E Ratio's determination.
Explanation:
To compute the earnings per share (EPS) for Ziegler Corporation, you divide the company's net income by the weighted-average number of common stock shares outstanding. According to the information provided, Ziegler Corporation reports a net income of $380,000 and there are 200,000 shares of common stock outstanding. Therefore, the EPS calculation is as follows:
Earnings Per Share = Net Income / Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
$380,000 / 200,000 shares$1.90 per shareThis EPS figure is a significant indicator used by investors to assess the company's profitability on a per-share basis and is often factored into the Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio, which helps determine the value and investment potential of a stock.
It announces that it plans to pay dividends of $1 per share exactly three years from now and $2 per share exactly four years from now. From year 5 onwards, dividends are expected to grow at a constant rate of 10% per year. The company pays no dividends in years one and two. The risk-free rate is 5%, the company's beta is 1.5 and the expected return on the market is 11%. Calculate the price of this stock at time period 4, P4
The Question is incomplete.
The complete question is as follows:
It announces that it plans to pay dividends of $1 per share exactly three years from now and $2 per share exactly four years from now. From year 5 onwards, dividends are expected to grow at a constant rate of 10% per year. The company pays no dividends in years one and two. The risk-free rate is 5%, the company's beta is 1.5 and the expected return on the market is 11%. Calculate the price of this stock today
Answer:
Price of stock = $34.42
Explanation:
The Dividend Valuation Model is a technique used to value the worth of an asset. According to this model, the worth of an asset is the sum of the present values of its future cash flows discounted at the required rate of return.
Required rate of return
Using the CAPM , the rate of return on equity can be determined as follows:
E(r)= Rf +β(Rm-Rf)
E(r) =? , Rf- 5%, Rm- 11%, β- 1.5
Ke = 5% + 1.5× (11-5)%
= 14%
Present value of Dividends(PV)
Year PV
3 $1.00, × (1.14^(-3) = 0.6749
4 $2.00× 1.14^(-4) = 1.18416
5 and beyond
This will be done in two (2) steps as follows:
PV in year 4 = (2 × 1.10) /(0.14-0.1) = 55
PV in year 0 = 55× 1.14^(-4) = 32.56
Price of stock
= 0.6749 + 1.18416 + 32.56
= $34.423
Upon completing an aging analysis of accounts receivable, the accountant for Rosco Works prepared an aging of accounts receivable and estimated that $6,700 of the $99,700 accounts receivable balance would be uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts had a $570 debit balance at year-end prior to adjustment. What is the amount of bad debt expense?
Answer:
-$7,270
Explanation:
Accounts receivable is the amount that is owed to the business by various parties that is due within a particular period.
In this instance there was an aging analysis done that estimated that $6,700 will be uncollectible. This will result in a bad debt expense of -$6,700.
Before now there was a balance of -$570 in allowance for doubtful accounts. Meaning there was a debit balance attributed to uncollected debt.
The total debt balance will now be -6,700-570 = -$7,270
Answer:
$7,270
Explanation:
Allowance for doubtful accounts is a contra asset account. It has credit balance and need to be adjusted against the receivable account balance to show net receivable amount on the balance sheet.
As $6,700 of uncollectible accounts receivables are estimated, but allowance account has a debit balance of $570.
Bad Debt Expense for the year = Estimated uncollectible accounts receivables + Year end debit balance of Allowance for doubtful accounts
Bad Debt Expense for the year = $6,700 + $570
Bad Debt Expense for the year = $7,270
5. Elmofud, Inc. is considering splitting its stock. The stock is currently priced at $90 per share. You own 100 shares of the stock. If the firm proceeds with a 3 for 1 split what will your position in the stock be after the split – how many shares will you own, what will the price per share be, and what will your total value be in the stock of Elmofud, Inc.?
Answer:
total value be in the stock $9,000
Explanation:
given data
currently priced = $90 per share
Number of Stocks = 100 share
solution
we get here first Value of Position that is express as
Value of Position = $90 × 100
Value of Position = $9,000
and
After stock split
Number of Stocks will be
Number of Stock = 100 × 3 = 300
and
Price per Share will be
Price per Share = [tex]\frac{90}{3}[/tex]
Price per Share = $30
so
Value of Position = 30 × 300
Value of Position = $9,000
Ann M. Martin Company makes the following errors during the current year. (Evaluate each case independently and assume ending inventory in the following year is correctly stated.) 1. Ending inventory is overstated, but purchases and related accounts payable are recorded correctly. 2. Both ending inventory and purchases and related accounts payable are understated. (Assume this purchase was recorded and paid for in the following year.) 3. Ending inventory is correct, but a purchase on account was not recorded. (Assume this purchase was recorded and paid for in the following year.) Indicate the effect of each of these errors on working capital, current ratio (assume that the current ratio is greater than 1), retained earnings, and net income for the current year and the subsequent year.
Answer:
Please find the detailed answer in the explanation section.
Explanation:
CURRENT YEAR SUBSEQUENT YEAR
1. Working Capital Overstated No effect
Current Ratio Overstated No effect
Retained Earnings Overstated No effect
Net Income Overstated Understated
2. Working Capital No effect No effect
Current Ratio Overstated No effect
Retained Earnings No effect No effect
Net Income No effect No effect
3. Working Capital Overstated No effect
Current Ratio Overstated No effect
Retained Earnings Overstated No effect
Net Income Overstated Understated
Capital budgeting is: the process of finding the cost to start a new project. the process of deciding which project to do to increase the firm’s value. the process of budgeting companies monthly revenue and cost. the process of estimating how long the life of a new project. None of the above.
Answer:
the process of deciding which project to do to increase the firm’s value.
Explanation:
Some of the Capital budgeting methods include:
1. internal rate of return- internal rate of return is the discount rate that equates the after tax cash flows from an investment to the amount invested.
2. Cash pay back period- it is the period it takes to recover the amount invested in a project from its cummulative cash flows.
3. Net present value: net present value is the present value of after tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
I hope my answer helps you
Capital budgeting is the process by which firms decide which long-term investments will maximize their value, involving the analysis of potential earnings and the source of capital required for these investments.
Capital budgeting is the process of deciding which project to do to increase the firm’s value. It involves evaluating the long-term profitability and financial impact of potential investments and projects. Firms raise financial capital to fund these projects, which can come from early-stage investors, reinvesting profits, borrowing, or selling stock.
Capital budgets differ from operating budgets in that they are used for long-term investments in assets like buildings and machinery, and are part of a capital improvement plan identifying long-term spending needs.
Unlike operating budgeting, which includes recurring spending items for day-to-day operations such as salaries and utilities, capital budgeting focuses on investments that will benefit the firm in the future, like purchasing new equipment or building new facilities. These decisions are crucial because they can impact a firm's earnings for years to come. Therefore, capital budgeting often involves cost analysis, comparison with potential revenues, and consideration of the cost of various sources of capital.
Worldwide Company obtained a charter from the state in January that authorized 200,000 shares of common stock, $10 par value. During the first year, the company earned $38,200, declared no dividends, and the following selected transactions occurred in the order given: Issued 60,000 shares of the common stock at $12 cash per share. Reacquired 2,000 shares at $15 cash per share from stockholders; the shares are now held in treasury. Reissued 1,000 of the shares in transaction (b) two months later at $18 cash per share. 3. Prepare the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet at December 31. TIP: Because this is the first year of operations, Retained Earnings has a zero balance at the beginning of the year. (Amounts to be deducted should be indicated by a minus sign.)
Answer and Explanation:
The preparation of stockholders’ equity section is shown below:-
Worldwide Company
Statement of stockholder equity
31 December
Paid-in-capital
Common stock - $10 par, 200,000 shares authorized
60,000 shares issued and outstanding $600,000
Paid in capital in excess of par - common $120,000
(60,000 × $12) - (60,000 × $10)
Paid in capital from treasury stock $3,000
(1,000 × $18) - (1,000 × $15)
Total paid in capital $717,000
Retained earning $38,200
Sub total $755,200
Less: Treasury stock at cost $15,000
(1,000 × $15)
Total stockholder equity $740,200
Therefore from above the stockholders’ equity is prepared.
The stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet at December 31 includes common stock, treasury stock, and retained earnings.
Explanation:To prepare the stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet, we need to consider the transactions that occurred during the year. First, the company issued 60,000 shares of common stock at $12 per share, which increases the common stock account by $720,000 (60,000 shares x $12 per share). Next, the company reacquired 2,000 shares at $15 per share, which decreases the common stock account by $30,000 (2,000 shares x $15 per share). The reacquired shares are now held in treasury. Then, the company reissued 1,000 of the treasury shares two months later at $18 per share, which increases the common stock account by $18,000 (1,000 shares x $18 per share). Since no dividends were declared, the retained earnings account remains at a zero balance.
Therefore, the stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet at December 31 would be as follows:
Common stock: $708,000 ($720,000 - $12,000)Treasury stock: ($30,000)Retained earnings: $0Learn more about stockholders' equity section here:https://brainly.com/question/33717039
#SPJ11
You own 260 shares of Abco, Inc. stock. The company has stated that it plans on issuing a dividend of $.50 a share at the end of this year and then You own 260 shares of Abco, Inc. stock. The company has stated that it plans on issuing a dividend of $.50 a share at the end of this year and then issuing a final liquidating dividend of $2.10 a share at the end of next year. Your required rate of return on this security is 11 percent. Ignoring taxes, what is the value of one share of this stock today?issuing a final liquidating dividend of $2.10 a share at the end of next year. Your required rate of return on this security is 11 percent. Ignoring taxes, what is the value of one share of this stock today?
Answer:
The answer is $2.15.
Explanation:
The value of one share of this stock today is the sum of present value of future cash flows earned from holding the stock; discounting at required rate of return 11%.
By holding the stock, there are two cash flows earned by shareholders which are:
+ Dividend of $.50 a share at the end of this year whose present value is: 0.5/1.11 = $0.45;
+ Liquidating dividend of $2.10 a share at the end of next year whose present value is: 2.1/1.11^2 = $1.70
=> Value of the stock = 0.45 + 1.70 = $2.15.
So, the answer is $2.15.
Monty Manufacturing has old equipment that cost $52,000. The equipment has accumulated depreciation of $28,300. Monty has decided to sell the equipment. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter 0 for the amounts.)
a. What entry would Monty make to record the sale of the equipment for $38,000 cash.
b. What entry would Monty make to record the sale of the equipment for $16,500 cash.
Answer:
a.
Cash 38000 Dr
Accumulated Depreciation-Equipment 28300 Dr
Equipment Account 52000 Cr
Gain on Disposal 14300 Cr
b.
Cash 16500 Dr
Accumulated Depreciation-Equipment 28300 Dr
Loss on Disposal 7200 Dr
Equipment Account 52000 Cr
Explanation:
a.
The carrying value of the equipment is its net value in the books after deducting the accumulated depreciation from the cost.
The carrying value of the asset before sale is = 52000 - 28300 = $23700
The gain/loss on disposal = Cash received from sale - carrying value
Gain/loss on disposal = 38000 - 23700 = $14300 or a gain of $14300
b.
The gain/loss on disposal = 16500 - 23700 = -$7200 or a loss of $7200
Answer:
a.
Cash$38,000 (debit)
Accumulated Depreciation$28,300 (debit)
Equipment $52,000 (credit)
Profit on Sale of Equipment $14,300
b.
Cash$16,500 (debit)
Accumulated Depreciation$28,300 (debit)
Loss on Sale of Equipment $7,300
Equipment $52,000 (credit)
Explanation:
For any Disposal of an Asset the following should occur:
De-recognise cost of the AssetDe-recognise Accumulated DepreciationRecognise the Proceeds of the SaleRecognise Profit or Loss on SaleBeta Company expects to incur overhead costs of $20,000 per month and direct production costs of $125 per unit. The estimated production activity for the upcoming year is 1,000 units. If the company desires to earn a gross profit of $50 per unit, the sales price per unit would be which of the following amounts
A) $379
B) $187
C) $136
D) $195
Answer:
$415
Explanation:
For computing the sales per unit first we have to determine the total sales value which is shown below:
Direct Production costs (1,000 units × $125) $125,000
Fixed Overhead costs for the year = $20,000 × 12 months = $240,000
Total Costs for the year $365,000
Gross Profit desired (1,000 units × $50) $50,000
Total Sales Value desired = Costs + Profit $415,000
Now
Sales price per unit is
= $415,000 ÷ 1,000 units
= $415
This is the answer but the same is not provided
The sales price per unit needed for Beta Company to achieve a gross profit of $50 per unit is $195, calculated by adding the per-unit production and overhead costs to the desired profit margin.
Explanation:To calculate the sales price per unit that Beta Company needs in order to achieve a gross profit of $50 per unit, we need to consider the given costs and desired profit margin. The company expects overhead costs of $20,000 per month. With an estimated production activity of 1,000 units, these fixed costs become $20 per unit (overhead costs / estimated production). The direct production cost is $125 per unit. Adding these costs together we get the total cost per unit, which is $125 (direct costs) + $20 (overhead per unit) = $145 per unit. To achieve a gross profit of $50, we add this desired profit to the total cost per unit, resulting in a sales price per unit of $195 ($145 + $50).
Cash Payments Schedule Fein Company provided the following information relating to cash payments: Fein purchased direct materials on account in the following amounts: June $68,000 July 77,000 August 73,000 Fein pays 20% of accounts payable in the month of purchase and the remaining 80% in the following month. In July, direct labor cost was $32,300. August direct labor cost was $35,400. The company finds that typically 90% of direct labor cost is paid in cash during the month, with the remainder paid in the following month. August overhead amounted to $71,200, including $6,350 of depreciation. Fein had taken out a 4-month loan of $15,000 on May 1. Interest, due with payment of principal, accrued at the rate of 9% per year. The loan and all interest were repaid on August 31. (Note: Use whole months to compute interest payment.)
Answer: $191,590
Explanation:
August Payments on accounts payable:
From JULY PURCHASES - $77,000 x 80%
$77,000 × 0.8 = $61,600
From August purchases - $73,000 x 20% $73,000 × 0.2 = $14,600
Direct labor payments:
From JULY: $32,300 x 10%
$32,300 × 0.1 = 3,230
From AUGUST: $35,400 x 90%
$35,400 × 0.9 = $31,860
Overhead : $71200 - $6350 = 64,850
Loan repayment - $15,450
Cash payments - $191,590
Loan repayment :
[Loan + ( loan × rate × period)
[15000 + (15000 × (9/100) × 4/12)]
15000 + 450 = $15,450
Cash payment for August :
15450+64850+31860+3230+14600+61600 = $191,590
Answer:
In August the cash payment plan is $197,940
The detailed presentation can be found in the attached file.
Lyons Company deducts insurance expense of $210,000 for tax purposes in 2018, but the expense is not yet recognized for accounting purposes. In 2019, 2020, and 2021, no insurance expense will be deducted for tax purposes, but $70,000 of insurance expense will be reported for accounting purposes in each of these years. Lyons Company has a tax rate of 40% and income taxes payable of $180,000 at the end of 2018. There were no deferred taxes at the beginning of 2018. What is the amount of the deferred tax liability at the end of 2018?
Answer:
$84,000
Explanation:
Deferred tax liability at the end of 2018 = Amount of insurance expense × Tax rate = $210,000 × $40% = $84,000
Therefore, the amount of the deferred tax liability at the end of 2018 is $84,000.
Blue Split sells ice cream cones in a variety of flavours. The following are data for a recent week: Revenue (1,000 cones at $1.85 each) $1,850 Cost of ingredients $660 Rent 540 Store attendant 640 1,840 Pretax income $10 The manager estimates that if she were to increase the price of cones from $1.85 to $2.02 each, weekly volume would be cut to 850 cones due to competition from other nearby ice cream shops. Estimate the profit-maximizing price per cone.
Answer:
$1.40
Explanation:
Per cent change in price = ($2.02– $1.85)/$1.85 = +9%
Per cent change in demand = (1000 – 850)/1000 = –15%
The elasticity is = ln(1 + per cent change in quantity sold)/ln(1 + per cent change in price)
= ln(1 – 0.15)/ln(1 + 0.09)
= –0.16252/0.08618
= –1.886
Variable cost = $660/1000
Profit-maximising price = [–1.886/(–1.886+1)]*$0.66 = $1.40
Wormwood, Ltd., produces a variety of furniture products. The planning committee wants to prepare an aggregate plan for the next six months using the following information: MONTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demand 160 150 160 180 170 140 Capacity Regular 150 150 150 150 160 160 Overtime 10 10 0 10 10 10 Cost Per Unit Regular time $ 50 Overtime 75 Subcontract 80 Inventory, per period 4 Subcontracting can handle a maximum of 10 units per month. Beginning inventory is zero. Develop a plan that minimizes total cost. No back orders are allowed. Regular production and overtime production can be less than capacity in any month.
Answer:
Wormwood limited
Production plan that will yield the least cost of $49,630 is shown in the attached document.
It entails maxing out the regular capacity from period 1 to 5, and using regular to produce only 140 units in period 6
It further entails using overtime to produce 10 units from period 1 to 5. And subcontracting only in period 4 to cover the demand/production gap.
This will keep inventory of 10 units in period 2, which is carried into period 3 and consumed in period 4.
To prepare an aggregate plan for Wormwood, Ltd., we need to consider demand and capacity for each month. By comparing the regular production and demand, we can determine if overtime or subcontracting is needed. Calculating the cost for each option will help us choose the plan with the lowest cost.
Explanation:To develop an aggregate plan that minimizes total cost for Wormwood, Ltd., we need to consider the demand and capacity for each month. If the regular production is less than or equal to the demand for a particular month, then no overtime or subcontracting is needed. However, if the regular production is less than the demand, we can use overtime or subcontracting to meet the demand.
Let's calculate the total cost for each option and choose the option with the lowest cost. For example, in Month 1, the demand is 160 and the regular capacity is also 160, so no additional production is needed. In Month 2, the demand is 150 and the regular capacity is 150, so again no additional production is needed.
If you go through this calculation for each month, you will find the aggregate plan that minimizes total cost.
Learn more about Aggregate planning here:https://brainly.com/question/29737926
#SPJ3
A granary allocates the cost of unprocessed wheat to the production of feed, flour, and starch. For the current period, unprocessed wheat was purchased for $310,000, and the following quantities of product and sales revenues were produced. Product Pounds Price per Pound Feed 150,000 $ 1.40 Flour 55,000 2.70 Starch 25,000 6.00 How much of the $310,000 cost should be allocated to feed if the value basis is used
Answer:
$98,973.77
Explanation:
The computation of the amount allocated to feed while using the value basis is shown below:
But before that first we have to find out the total cost which is
Feed (100,000 × $1.40) = $140,000
Flour (55,000 × $2.70) = 148,500
Starch (25,000 × 6) = 150,000
Total 438,500
Now the allocated value is
= 140,000 ÷ 438,500 × $310,000
= $98,973.77
We simply do the above calculations
Final answer:
Approximately $127,842.63 of the $310,000 cost of unprocessed wheat should be allocated to feed based on the value basis using the proportion of feed's revenue in relation to total revenue.
Explanation:
The question asks how much of the $310,000 cost of unprocessed wheat should be allocated to the production of feed on a value basis. To answer this, we must calculate the total revenue for each product and then find the proportion of total revenue that comes from feed. Multiplying this proportion by the total cost of the wheat gives us the allocation for feed.
The total revenue for feed is 150,000 pounds × $1.40 per pound, which equals $210,000. For flour, it is 55,000 pounds × $2.70 per pound, equaling $148,500, and for starch, it is 25,000 pounds × $6.00 per pound, totaling $150,000. The combined revenue for all products is $210,000 + $148,500 + $150,000 = $508,500. The feed's proportion of the total revenue is $210,000 / $508,500. To get the allocation for feed, multiply this proportion by the total cost of the wheat ($310,000), which gives us approximately $127,842.63.
Therefore, $127,842.63 of the $310,000 cost should be allocated to the production of feed.
Minmax Co.'s direct labor information for February is as follows: Direct labor hours worked (AQ) 35,600 Standard direct labor hours for units manufactured (SQ) 38,000 Unfavorable direct labor rate variance $ 17,800 Total payroll for direct labor $ 427,200 The direct labor efficiency variance in February (to the nearest dollar) was:
Answer:
$27,600 unfavorable
Explanation:
In order to calculated labor efficiency variance which is standard cost of actual hours less standard cost, first compute standard rate as shown below:
Unfavorable direct labor rate variance = $17,800
Unfavorable direct labor rate variance = Actual rate - standard rate × Actual hours
Actual rate = Total payroll for direct labor ÷ Direct labor hours (AQ)
= 427,200 ÷ 35,600
= $12 per unit
Substituting the values in the above formula:
17,800 = (12 - SR) × 35,600
SR = $11.5
Now calculate Standard cost of actual hours = Direct labor hours × SR
= 35,600 × 11.5
= $409,400
Standard cost = Standard direct hours × SR
= 38,000 × 11.5
= $437,000
Direct labor efficiency variance = Standard actual of actual hours - Standard cost
= 409,400 - 437,000
= - $27,600 or $27,600 unfavorable
Final answer:
The direct labor efficiency variance for Minmax Co. in February was a $27,600 unfavorable variance, calculated using the actual direct labor rate and standard rates derived from the provided information on total payroll and variance.
Explanation:
To calculate the direct labor efficiency variance, we need the standard cost per hour for direct labor. Given the Total payroll for direct labor ($427,200) and the actual labor hours (AQ) of 35,600, we can find the actual rate per hour by dividing the total payroll by the hours worked:
Actual Rate (AR) = Total Payroll / AQ = $427,200 / 35,600 hours = $12 per hour
Since we have the Unfavorable direct labor rate variance ($17,800) and know it is calculated as (AR - SR) * AQ, we can rearrange this to find the Standard Rate (SR):
SR = AR - (Unfavorable rate variance / AQ)
SR = $12 - ($17,800 / 35,600 hours) = $12 - $0.5 = $11.50 per hour
The standard direct labor hours (SQ) for the units manufactured are given as 38,000 hours. With the SR and SQ, we can calculate the direct labor efficiency variance:
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance = (AQ - SQ) * SR = (35,600 hours - 38,000 hours) * $11.50 per hour = -$27,600
This variance is unfavorable because the AQ is less than the SQ, indicating less efficiency. Therefore, the direct labor efficiency variance in February was a $27,600 unfavorable variance.
Wildcat Co. purchased, on open account, 4,000 pounds of direct materials at a total cost of $20,200. The standard cost of these materials, at $5.00 per pound, was $20,000. The company records any price variance for direct materials at point of purchase. During the current month 1,000 units of output were produced. Each unit of output, at standard, requires 2 pounds of direct materials, at $5.00 per pound. A total of 1,950 pounds of material was consumed in production during the month. The direct labor payroll for the period was $25,000 and has yet to be paid. The standard direct labor hours to produce each unit is 2 and the standard wage rate per hour is $11. The actual wage rate per hour was $10. The standard direct manufacturing cost for each unit is $32. During the month, 1,000 units were produced. During the month, 900 units were sold, at a price of $50 per unit. Record the journal entries for each of the events and transactions.
Answer:
Explanation:
The pictures attached shows the full explanation
When a firm initiates or increases a cash discount, the net effect on the accounts receivable investment is difficult to determine because the nondiscount takers paying earlier will reduce the accounts receivable investment, while the new customer accounts will increase this investment.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
Yes is True that when a firm initiates or increases a cash discount, the net effect on the accounts receivable investment is difficult to determine because the nondiscount takers paying earlier will reduce the accounts receivable investment, while the new customer accounts will increase this investment.
Explanation:
Accounts Receivable is any amount of money owed by customers for purchases made on credit. It is an asset account on the balance sheet since it is money due in the short run.
As a current asset, Accounts Receivable is an important aspect of a businesses' fundamental analysis used to measures a company's liquidity or ability to cover short-term obligations without additional cash flows.
Accounts receivable Investment will be reduced if the firm initiates or increases a cash discount.
A. True. Offering or increasing cash discounts affects accounts receivable in opposing ways, making it hard to predict the net effect.
The statement is True. When a firm offers or increases a cash discount, it affects the timing and amount of cash inflows. Customers who take advantage of the discount will pay sooner, thus reducing the accounts receivable balance.
However, the firm might also attract new customers who may not take the discount, potentially increasing accounts receivable. These opposing effects make it challenging to predict the net impact on the accounts receivable investment.
Which of these is an example of demographic data?
A- Personality
B- Appiteite
C- Style
D- Martial Status
Martial Status is an example of demographic data. Option (d) is correct for the question.
What do you mean by Personality?The term "personality" refers to the persistent traits, interests, motivations, values, self-concept, abilities, and emotional patterns that make up a person's particular way of adjusting to life.
A population's traits or changes over time are measured by demographic statistics. Making informed judgments regarding national policy requires access to data from records of births, deaths, marriages, immigration, and emigration as well as a periodical census of the population.
The population pyramid provides a helpful summary of this data. It offers information in an understandable graphical manner regarding the population's sex and age distribution.
The life table is yet another summary. It tracks and projects the life experiences of a cohort of people born in the same year from conception to death. The percentage of a cohort that is anticipated to live through each year (or decade in an abbreviated life table) is displayed in tabular or graphical form.
Therefore, Option (d) is correct. An example of demographic data is martial Status.
Learn more about Personality, here;
https://brainly.com/question/21556710
#SPJ2
Tina and Bob formed the TB Partnership four years ago. Because they decided the company needed some expertise in multimedia presentations, they offered Kate a one-third interest in partnership capital if she would come to work for the partnership. On August 4 of the current year, the unrestricted partnership interest (fair market value of $25,000) was transferred to Kate. How should Kate treat the receipt of the partnership interest in the current year
Answer:
$25,000 will be an ordinary income(FMV)
Explanation:
Kate received an offer of unrestricted partnership capital interest for the expertise services. so, Kate recognizes it's an "ordinary income"which should be booked at the fair market value of the partnership interest so offered.
i.e $25,000 is ordinary income (FMV)
A used car can be kept for two more years and then sold for an estimated $3000, or it could be sold now for $7500. The average annual maintenance cost over the past 7 years has been $500 per year. However, if the car is kept for two more years this cost is expected to be $1800 the first year and $2000 the second year. As an alternative a new car can be purchased for $22,000 and be used for 4 years, after which it can be sold for $8000. The new car will be under warranty for the first 4 years, and not extra maintenance cost will be incurred during those years. If the MARR is 15% per year what is the better option and why?
a. Keep car, do not buy new one because EUAC Defender is $5111 and EUAC of Challenger is $6104
b. Buy new car because EUAC of challenger is $4904 and EUAC and defender is $5111
c. Buy new car because EUAC of Challenger is -$9308 and EUAC of defender is $498
Final answer:
To determine whether to keep an old car or buy a new one, you calculate and compare the Equivalent Uniform Annual Cost (EUAC) for each, taking into account all costs and the time value of money as per the Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR). The option with the lower EUAC is usually preferred, signaling better economic value over time. Due to discrepancies in the information provided, a precise recommendation cannot be made without accurate data.
Explanation:
Evaluating the Economic Merits of Keeping vs. Buying a Car
To decide between keeping a used car or buying a new one, we need to calculate and compare the Equivalent Uniform Annual Cost (EUAC) for each option. A challenge in this business decision lies in accounting for all associated costs including purchase, maintenance, and sale price, and the time value of money represented by the Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR) over a given period.
For the used car (Defender), we have:
- Future sale price in two years: $3000
- Maintenance costs for the next two years: $1800 and $2000 respectively
- Selling now price: $7500
Calculating the EUAC for the used car incorporates these costs and the MARR of 15%.
The new car (Challenger) would require:
- Initial purchase price: $22,000
- Sale price after 4 years: $8000
- Maintenance costs: $0 (due to warranty)
Again, calculating the EUAC for the new car incorporates the purchase and future sale price and considers the MARR of 15%.
To make an informed decision, we would perform a detailed calculation for each option's EUAC, compare the results, and choose the option with the lower EUAC, indicating a more economical choice over time. However, the information provided appears to contain a discrepancy, and without correct data or further clarification, we cannot provide an exact answer. The concept of EUAC is essential for understanding how to evaluate such financial decisions effectively.
Swift Delivery is a small company that transports business packages between New York and Chicago. It operates a fleet of small vans that moves packages to and from a central depot within each city and uses a common carrier to deliver the packages between the depots in the two cities. Swift Delivery recently acquired approximately $4 million of cash capital from its owners, and its president, George Hay, is trying to identify the most profitable way to invest these funds. Todd Payne, the company’s operations manager, believes that the money should be used to expand the fleet of city vans at a cost of $900,000. He argues that more vans would enable the company to expand its services into new markets, thereby increasing the revenue base. More specifically, he expects cash inflows to increase by $325,000 per year. The additional vans are expected to have an average useful life of four years and a combined salvage value of $100,000. Operating the vans will require additional working capital of $50,000, which will be recovered at the end of the fourth year. In contrast, Oscar Vance, the company’s chief accountant, believes that the funds should be used to purchase large trucks to deliver the packages between the depots in the two cities. The conversion process would produce continuing improvement in operating savings and reduce cash outflows as follows: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 $ 175,000 $ 375,000 $ 450,000 $ 500,000 The large trucks are expected to cost $1,000,000 and to have a four-year useful life and a $81,250 salvage value. In addition to the purchase price of the trucks, up-front training costs are expected to amount to $20,000. Swift Delivery’s management has established a 10 percent desired rate of return. (PV of $1 and PVA of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.)
Required a.&b. Determine the net present value and present value index for each investment alternative. (Enter answers in whole dollar, not in million. Round your intermediate calculations and final answers to 2 decimal places.)
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Net Present Value (NPV): It the distinction among the initial cash outflow and the present value of cash inflows. It assists in making project investment conclusion. A positive NPV means that the project should be accepted and if it is on negative swing then it should be rejected. Projects with upper NPV should be accepted in case of two mutually exclusive projects having positive net present value.
Use spreadsheet for the required computations. Enter values and formulas in the spreadsheet as shown in the image below.
Swift Delivery must calculate the net present value and present value index for both the option of investing in more vans and the option of purchasing trucks for inter-city deliveries. These calculations will enable them to determine which option is the more profitable one.
Explanation:To determine which investment would be more profitable for Swift Delivery, we need to calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) for both options. NPV is the present value of future cash inflows minus the present value of cash outflows, all calculated at a desired rate of return.
Investment in Vans
To calculate the NPV for Todd Payne's proposal, we take the present value of new cash inflows, the present value of the salvage value of the vans, and subtract the cost of the vans and the working capital needed.
Investment in Trucks
For Oscar Vance's plan, we calculate the present value of the operational savings, add the present value of the salvage value of the trucks, then subtract the cost of the trucks and the upfront training costs.
The investment with the higher NPV is the more profitable one. The Present Value Index (PVI) is calculated by dividing the present value of future net cash inflows by the initial investment. The investment with the higher PVI is the one that gives more return per unit of currency invested.
Learn more about Net Present Value here:https://brainly.com/question/32720837
#SPJ12
Taylor United is considering overhauling its equipment to meet increased demand for its product. The cost of equipment overhaul is $4.02 million, plus $214,086.00 in installation costs. The firm will straight-line depreciate the equipment to zero using a 5-year recovery period. Additional sales from the overhaul should amount to $239,013.00 per year, and additional operating expenses and other costs (excluding depreciation) will amount to 39.00% of the additional sales. The firm has an ordinary tax rate of 37.00%. What is the operating cash flow for year 1 of this project?
Answer:
$405,175.06
Explanation:
The computation of the operating cash flow for year 1 is shown below:
Sales $239,013
Less operating expenses & other cost ($239,013 × 39%) -$93,215.07
Less: Depreciation expenses
($4,020,000 + $214,086) ÷ 5 years -$846,817.20
Earning before interest and taxes -$701,019.27
Less: Taxes at 37% $259,377.13
Net income -$441,642.14
Add: depreciation expenses $846,817.20
Operating cash flow $405,175.06
We simply deduct the operating sales and depreciation expenses from sales so that the EBIT could arrive after that taxes are deducted so that the net income could come and then finally added depreciation expenses so that operating cash flow could come
A DI has two assets: 50 percent in one-month T-bills and 50 percent in real estate loans. If the DI must liquidate its T-bills today, it receives $98 per $100 of face value; if it can wait to liquidate them on maturity (in one month's time), it will receive $100 per $100 of face value. If the DI has to liquidate its real estate loans today, it receives $90 per $100 of face value. However, liquidation of real estate loans at the end of one month will produce $92 per $100 of face value. The one-month liquidity index value for this DI's asset portfolio is:
Answer:
Explanation:
The one-month liquidity index value for this DI's asset portfolio
= weight of T-bills * (value of T-bill today / value of T-bills after one month) + weight of real estate loan * (value of real estate loan today / value of real estate loan after one month)
= 50% * ($97 / $ 100) + 50% ($93/ $94)
= 0.5 * 0.97 + 0.5 *0.9894 = 0.9797
Therefore one-month liquidity index value for this DI's asset portfolio is 0.98.
Final answer:
The one-month liquidity index value of a depository institution's asset portfolio with 50% in T-bills and 50% in real estate loans is 0.97915.
Explanation:
The question asks about computing the one-month liquidity index value of a depository institution's (DI) asset portfolio, which comprises 50 percent in one-month T-bills and 50 percent in real estate loans. The liquidity index is a measure of how much less the DI would obtain if it had to liquidate assets today compared to their value at maturity in one month. To calculate this, we must compare the liquidation values (immediate cash received) for each asset type against their face value if held to maturity.
For the T-bills:
Immediate liquidation: $98 per $100 of face value
Value at maturity: $100 per $100 of face value
For the real estate loans:
Immediate liquidation: $90 per $100 of face value
Value at maturity: $92 per $100 of face value
The liquidity index for each asset type is calculated by dividing the immediate liquidation value by the value at maturity:
T-bills liquidity index = $98 / $100 = 0.98
Real estate loans liquidity index = $90 / $92 = 0.9783
As the portfolio is evenly split between the two assets, the overall liquidity index value of the asset portfolio is the average of the two individual indices:
Overall liquidity index = (0.98 + 0.9783) / 2 = 0.97915
Unis Technologies has introduced a new installation program that is the first of its kind and requires a great deal of complex technological understanding. Although it is being marketed as a user-friendly system, consumers are apprehensive about buying it. Unis Technologies' promotion mix will likely: focus heavily on personal selling. contain short-run incentives. rely on sales promotion. rely on advertising.
Answer:
Focus heavily on personal selling.
Explanation:
Personal selling is a selling technique in which the salesperson meets the customer face to face, introduces the product, explains its use and characteristics extensively, and tries to close the sell by building rapport.
Because the product that Unis Technologies is promoting is complicated to use, and few people have the required knowledge, the company will have to focus on personal selling, otherwise, the potential customers will likely feel intimitaded and not buy the product.
What are corrective actions, how does the project manager know that corrective action is needed, how are the root causes of corrective actions determined, how is the effectiveness of a corrective action measured, and what happens if the necessary corrective action is not performed in a timely fashion
Answer:
1. Corrective actions are actions executed to prevent occurrences of an identified hazard or to prevent the recurrence of an issue. Corrective actions may also question and seek proper handling of a weakness identified in a safety management system.
2. Project managers employ corrective actions when a specific task or project may have lost focus or somehow deviated form the pre-specified direction it was intended to take.
3. The root causes of corrective actions are determined by confirming the identified root cause causes. Basically, a corrective action should correspond to the root cause identified earlier in order to eliminate the real root cause and prevent recurrence of the problem.
4. Verifying the effectiveness of corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs) closes the gap between identifying a problem and completing the actions to solve it. It is reasonable to assume that if a problem is worth solving, it's also worth verifying that the solution worked.
5. It could result to total loss in product or a ruin in the normal sequence of an existing system
Valuing Trading Securities at Fair Value On January 1, Valuation Allowance for Trading Investments had a zero balance. On December 31, the cost of the trading securities portfolio was $41,500, and the fair value was $46,300. Prepare the December 31 adjusting journal entry to record the unrealized gain or loss on trading investments.
Answer:
Dr. Trading securities $4,800
Cr. Unrealized gain on trading securities $4,800
Explanation:
Trading securities are recorded reported on the fair market value. The gain or loss arise from the increase or decrease in the value of trading securities. There is a gain if the price of trading security increases and loss when the price of the trading security decreases. Unrealized gains are reported in the separate section of stockholders equity.
Gain on Trading securities = Fair value of security portfolio - Cost of security portfolio = $46,300 - $41,500 = $4,800