Please help me i appreciate it. Thank you

Answer: its (A) : A graph

Use analysis in a sentence. noun. The definition of analysis is the process of breaking down a something into its parts to learn what they do and how they relate to one another. Examining blood in a lab to discover all of its components is an example of analysis.

If you still dont get it let me know so i can give you a 1 paragraph story about it or 2.

Hypothesize is a is a hypothesis, which means a guess based off of limited evidence. A sentence starting with this could be "Hypothesize about this, the woman wasn't home at that time, so does that mean she could have committed the murder?" Or something along that line.

Hope I could help!

The correct answer is Option 2, the emotional response a text generates from a reader, accurately defines atmosphere in literature. It highlights the impact the text has on the reader, evoking specific emotions and creating a particular mood.

Atmosphere in literature refers to the emotional response a text generates from a reader. It encompasses the overall mood, tone, and ambiance created within a literary work.

While the other options touch on different aspects of literary analysis, they do not fully capture the essence of atmosphere as the emotional or psychological response elicited in the reader. The attitude of a text toward the subject and theme (option 1), the author's opinion of the subject and the audience (option 3), and the narrator's perspective in relation to the characters (option 4) are important elements, but they do not encompass the broader concept of atmosphere.

In literature, atmosphere is crafted through various literary devices such as descriptive language, imagery, setting, and tone. It sets the overall mood and influences the reader's interpretation and experience of the text. By creating a specific atmosphere, authors can immerse readers in the world of the story, evoke emotions, and enhance the overall meaning and impact of the narrative.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 2, the emotional response a text generates from a reader, accurately defines atmosphere in literature. It highlights the impact the text has on the reader, evoking specific emotions and creating a particular mood.

Learn more about atmosphere in literature here:

https://brainly.com/question/17915207

#SPJ2

Left

This is from Mark Twain's Tom Sawyer. You need a sentence and a half to fulfill the conditions of what you are asked.

The sentence beginning "Injun Joe infested all his dreams ..." The his refers to Tom. Unfortunately, that does not include Huck, so you have to go  another 1/2 sentence to get how Huck responded to Injun Joe (same way). Whoever made the question was a little bit sloppy in what they wanted. If it was just Tom, you could do it in one sentence. But to get both boys into the thought you need a 1/2 more sentence which begins

Poor Huck was in the same state of wretchedness and horror.

Middle

This is a case where you have notes, I would assume. The last one is certainly part of any persuasive argument. You have to know both sides in order to defend one successfully. So one of the answers is E.

That makes A incorrect. You have to choose one side of the topic, but you cannot be blind to the other side. You must somehow be able to mention and quickly counter the other side. That takes a lot of study.

Popularity has nothing to do with what to choose. The may want to take "the road less traveled." So B is incorrect. You have to go with what you believe, unless you are writing a speech for someone who has his own point of view.

C is pragmatic. You might do that if you have no feelings one way or the other about the topic. You have to look this up.

D has the same answer as C. It depends. If you are going to a Christian School abortion is going to be very hard to defend. Should you try? And you have to look at your notes that came with this question.

E is a definite yes.

Right

An infinitive is a verb form. It is usually a noun but not always. It is easily identified but can be a little harder to state what it does in the sentence.

Identification: There is only one sentence that has an infinitive in it and that is the fourth one down. "To win ... [her approval and trust]."

Function: It is not a noun. To win is not the same thing as goal. The verb used in the 4th one down is was which is a linking verb. If there is a noun used after it, then (in this case) it must be the same as goal.

It is not an adverb. To win would have to make was clearer which it does not. To win tells us nothing about the nature of was.

It is an adjective. The adjective modifies goal. The goal is a winning goal. The objective is to win the teacher's approval. The proper term for such an adjective is a predicate adjective.

I think that a big part of the suspense in "The Pit and Pendulum" comes from two sources.  

The first is the unknown. The reader has no idea why the protagonist has been arrested and sentenced. The opening paragraphs have him in and out of conscious thought all while hallucinating. We don't know who he is or what he has done to deserve punishment. Once he is in his cell, the unknown continues.

In “The Pit and the Pendulum,” Edgar Allan Poe creates suspense through a first-person narrative, vivid descriptions of the environment, and a combination of psychological tension and abrupt terrifying events.

In his classic horror story, “The Pit and the Pendulum,” Edgar Allan Poe expertly creates suspense through a variety of literary techniques. Poe uses a combination of a first-person narrative, detailed descriptions, and psychological tension to keep readers on edge. Firstly, the first-person point of view immerses readers into the protagonist’s mind, allowing them to experience his fear and confusion directly. As he awakens in a dark cell, unaware of his surroundings, readers feel his terror and uncertainty.

Secondly, Poe’s vivid and meticulous descriptions of the environment, such as the pendulum’s razor-sharp blade and the treacherous pit, generate a palpable sense of impending doom. The protagonist’s observations and sensory details heighten the readers' anxiety as they can vividly visualize the gruesome threats he faces.

Finally, the combination of slow-burning psychological tension and moments of quiet introspection followed by abrupt, terrifying events, like the looming descent of the pendulum, creates a rollercoaster of emotions. This oscillation between calm and terror keeps readers in a constant state of suspense, eagerly anticipating what will happen next.

The correct answer would be B. Capitalize a letter because that symbol with 3 lines underneath a letter means that we have to CAPITALIZE a letter.

Hope I helped.

Answer:

The correct answer is D: Lowercase a letter

Explanation:

The symbol (lc) is a symbol for lower case and if it was (cl) that would mean upper case so on and so forth, Pretty easy non complicated question. Hope this helps!

The correct option is B) Manual

Manuals are usually found in equipment that requires someone to assemble it

Hope this helps you

-AaronWiseIsBae

The bake sale was profitable and there was remarkable cake.

Can u provide more detail.

 Answer: The first suggestion is to eliminate the last sentence that says:

I think she was a terrific scientist.

Summaries should not contain your own point of view, so any word that is not objective and explains what you feel about the text is wrong.

Second suggestion: It should include more specific and important facts that are not mentioned, as the fact that she started working with Elion as an assistant and then as a colleague of Hitchings and then they dicovered a variety of new drugs while she was helping Hitchings. Another important fact is that adter Elion retired in 1983 she helped with the development of a drug to treat AIDS.

Third suggestion: The summary should give precise information, so sentences as

She went to school for many years and eventually won the Nobel prize.

Are not precise, the year or the duration of his studies must be present

Answer: Eliminate the last sentence I think she was a terrific scientist and keep your opinions to yourself.

Should've included specific and important facts, like Elion She was an assistant and then, as a colleague of the hitchings, they discovered a variety of new drugs Then Elion retired in 1983 She was helping with the development of a drug to treat aids.

The article should have given precise information like, She tried different jobs and went to school for many years, then she won the Nobel prize.

Explanation: Student J. Doe's Summary

Was missing a lot of things because it a big article

Gertrude Elion was born in 1918 in New York City. She went to school for many years and eventually won the Nobel prize. She was unable to obtain a graduate research position because she was a woman. She took a series of jobs, including lab assistant, chemistry and physics teacher in New York City high schools, and research chemist. She was a scientist who helped discover many important drugs that saved lives. Elion also discovered new ways to test drugs. She died in 1999, 16 years after she retired from Burroughs Wellcome Laboratories.I think she was a terrific scientist.

The answer is nevertheless.

Dogs are mans best friend. I see people confuse man with mankind in this phrase.

Final answer:

The detail related to the main idea of the passage is that dogs are man’s best friend.

Explanation:

The detail in the passage that is related to the main idea of the passage is that dogs are man’s best friend. The passage mentions that dogs are not only man's best friend but also girl's best friend. It describes the loyalty and companionship of the speaker's golden retriever named Rags. This detail supports the main idea that dogs are loyal companions and friends to humans.

The answer is Prying

hope it helps

that does indeed describe many, but in fact rain does fall in desert environments, ... definitions for what constitutes a desert, all involve low rainfall. ... the Arctic and Antarctic qualifies as desert due to low precipitation;

Answer: "Without innovations in food production, the factories could not have grown so quickly."

This sentence is placed in the text as an example of how urbanization increased thanks to technological improvements. However, no other part of the text discusses food production. Also, the author does not explain how it is that food production contributed to the development of factories. Because it is only loosely related to the topic and it adds so few details, it is a superfluous sentence. It is possible to remove it without significantly affecting the rest of the text.

he established the horror genre as we know it (this is the answer if its multiple choice)

He paved the way for writing as a career. (Apex)

A is spelled correctly, since in every other sentence, they use the wrong "their, there, or they're."

The sentence that is spelled correctly is "I searched the yard, but I didn't see my brother there." So the correct option is A.

There are no grammatical or punctuation problems in this statement, and every word is written correctly. The verb "searched" is in the past tense, matching the subject "I." The word "yard" is spelt correctly, and the word "but" is appropriately utilized to connect two opposing viewpoints.

It is proper to uppercase the pronoun "I" at the start of a sentence. The proper way to shorten "did not" is with the contraction "didn't." Last but not least, the term "there" is correctly employed to denote a location.

Option B is erroneous because it should read "their" rather than "they're." While "they're" is a contraction of "they are," which is not the meaning meant in this line, "their" is a possessive pronoun that denotes possession.

Option C is erroneous since it should read "their" rather than "there." The possessive form of the pronoun "they," "their" denotes possession. "There" designates a location rather than a thing.

Option D is erroneous since it should read "They're" rather than "Their." The word "they're" is an abbreviation for "they are," which is what this statement means. Therefore, choice A is the sentence that is spelled correctly.

To learn more about grammatical error link is here

brainly.com/question/34137707

#SPJ2

Answer: I think the answers are A,B,C

Explanation:

If I am wrong im sorry

Global warming is a direct cause of pollution, which is a cause of severe concern among modern nations. Global warming is the increase of the Earth’s average temperature, which might seem to not be a lot, but it has some serious consequences when it comes to having changes in climate patterns, which affects the environment all around the world.  

Further Explanation:

The causes of global warming are several but have been typically accelerated by the constant increase of greenhouse gas emissions, triggered by industrial use and human activities. Environmental scientists have been monitoring the course of climate change patterns, and have also recorded some highly unlikely changes in weather patterns over the last decades. Global warming has now become a problem of international attention, prompting governments all around the world to rise to the occasion and take necessary measures to cut down greenhouse gas emissions.  

One of the direct repercussions of global warming is that the increase of earth’s temperatures causes it to heat and subsequently melt ice at the polar ice caps. The molten freshwater increases the sea level, which is a serious danger to the existence of coastal and island nations and cities. The constant rising sea levels are predicted to be the end of certain nations such as Seychelles, Tuvalu, the Caribbean and Florida. The constant warming of sea and ocean temperatures affect the flow of air and ocean currents, which form the basis of sustaining life in several regions. Due to changing wind and monsoon patterns, agricultural production gets affected, resulting in crop failures, droughts and famines. The warm ocean temperatures can prove fatal to several sea creatures who do not have a quick adaptive body to such rapidly changing surroundings, leading entire species to die out and face mass extinction.

Learn more:

        https://brainly.com/question/1620720

        https://brainly.com/question/1553517

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Effects of global warming

Subject: Environmental Sciences

Keywords:

Global warming, greenhouse gas emissions, climate change, environmental disasters, changing course of ocean currents, crop failures, government action, mass extinction.  

I think that the interference of gods in human life would be good if they use their experience to improve our existence, to stop certain things from happening, to help mortals.

This is what Athena tries to do for Oddyseus and his family. She disguises as a friend of Laertes, Odysseus' father. She then meets Telemachus and she advises him to meet with his mother's suitors.

Athena also connects him to kings Nestor and Menelaus so the prince can know his father, Odysseus, is actually alive.

Further evidence of positive interference is Zeus sending Hermes to convince Calypso to set Odysseus free.

On the contrary, when Poseidon, god of the sea, finds Odysseus escaping on a ship he causes a storm to sink it. He decides to do this because of revenge since Oddyseus had blinded his son on a previous adventure.

To summarize, I believe gods interference should be allowed only when it can be helpful when it can raise the quality of life.

Your answer should include the following points:

A discussion of what you think about gods getting involved in your daily activities.

Some instances where gods intervening in your life would really be helpful. For instance, it would be helpful if Neptune (the god of the sea) would contain the damage and destruction caused by floods, cyclones, and tornados.

Your thoughts on whether the gods’ involvement would always be beneficial and constructive. For example, Minerva’s constant support of Ulysses helps him stay alive on his journey and arrive home safely. Having supernatural support could be pretty great.

An explanation of why you believe the gods' involvement in human affairs would make life worse. For example, in the Odyssey, Neptune’s interference proved to be fatal for the Phaeacians. So if gods played favorites with humans, it could be disastrous for some people.

the correct answer is D

Congresswoman Chisholm used the supremacist myth comparison to emphasize equality for both genders.

**Congresswoman Chisholm** used the **supremacist myth comparison** in her argument to **highlight the absurdity** of believing that one gender needs protection more than the other, similar to how white supremacist myths are rejected in society today. She aimed to **emphasize** that **equality** in terms of rights and protections should be extended to **both men and women**. The comparison was made to challenge the **patriarchal norms** that perpetuate unequal treatment based on gender.

2nd highlighted selection; "kept so much to herself", "felt like she couln't do her part"

The Wikipedia answer is: "Rebecca Towne Nurse was executed for witchcraft by the government of the Province of Massachusetts Bay in New England during the Salem Witch Trials in 1692. She was the wife of Francis Nurse, with several children and grandchildren, and a well-respected member of the community."

Hope this helps :)

Final answer:

Rebecca Nurse was an individual involved in the Salem witch trials in 1692. She was accused of witchcraft and ultimately executed. Her case is a significant example of the mass hysteria and prejudice that occurred during the trials.

Explanation:

Rebecca Nurse was a notable individual during the Salem witch trials in 1692. She was accused of witchcraft and ultimately convicted and executed. The nurse was known for her reputation as a devout Christian and upstanding member of the community, which made her arrest and sentencing shocking to many.

Rebecca Nurse's trial and execution were part of a larger hysteria in Salem, Massachusetts, where many individuals were accused of witchcraft based on rumors, accusations, and superstitious beliefs. The events of the Salem witch trials serve as a dark chapter in American history and highlight the dangers of mass hysteria and prejudice.

Answer:b the narrator

Explanation:

In poetry, the term 'speaker' refers to the narrator of a poem, which is the voice or perspective that tells the poem. The speaker should not be confused with the poet themselves, as it is often a created persona within the poem.

In poetry, the term speaker refers to the narrator of a poem; it is the voice or perspective through which a poem is told. This is analogous to a narrator in prose, but it should not be confused with the poet themselves. Often, the speaker in a poem is a created character and may not represent the poet's personal voice or opinions. For example, the speaker in "Richard Cory" by Edwin Arlington Robinson is presumably a townsperson who observes Richard Cory from afar, rather than the poet expressing his own views.

The concept of the speaker is central to understanding poetry, as it requires the reader to listen and engage with the poem as if the words were spoken directly to them. This interaction relies on the poem’s use of rhythm, pauses, stresses, and inflections to create an emotional experience for the reader. It is also essential to differentiate between the poet, who authors the poem, and the speaker, who is the voice crafted by the poet to communicate within the poem.

https://brainly.com/question/30285935

#SPJ2

The effect of a staged murder on the audience depends on the nature and presentation of the act. It could range from shock and fear to empathy and reflectiveness. The audience's reaction is often directed by the thought and message intended by the creators.

The act of a murder being committed on stage may have multiple effects on the audience. From the audience's perspective, they would experience an intense range of emotions. These emotions could range from shock, fear to empathy depending on how immersive and real the act is portrayed. The aim of such shocking displays has often been to elicit a strong response from the audience and ignite thought-provoking questions.

Considering the brutal atrocities mentioned in your information, it seems that horrifying mass acts like the slaughter in the Sacred Patio were enacted cruelly and openly. This would leave the audience in a state of terror and shock, imprinting a deep impact on their minds. This material seems compelling and might leave audiences contemplating the horrific reality of such aggressive acts.

In the case of the Russian bear mauling, the audience reaction might be slightly different. Here, the unexpected turn of events would lead to the shock in the audience. In such chaotic acts, audiences might also reflect on issues like animal cruelty and the safety of performers.

https://brainly.com/question/28180014

#SPJ3

Answer:

what are the options

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is D. Setting.