please show work

1. y = 2 x + 3
y = 3


2. y = 2 x - 5
y = x


3. y = 4x + 10
y = -6

When you want a parallel line through a given point (h, k), you can start with the equation you have and do the following:

Here, that looks like

... (y-(-100)) = -2(x-(-100))

... y = -2x -200 -100 . . . . . eliminate parentheses, add -100

... y = -2x -300 . . . . the equation you want.

Answer:

y = - 2x - 100

Step-by-step explanation:

Remark

The line we want is a line parallel to y = - 2x + 3

That means it has the same slope as the given line.  The given line has a slope of  -2

y = -2x + b is what you have so far. Now you have to use the point to get b

y = - 100

x = - 100

Solve for b

-100 = -2(-100) + b

-100 = 200 + b       Notice the sign change. Two minus's make a plus. Subtract 200 from both sides.

- 100 - 200 = b

- 300 = b

Answer

y = - 2x - 100

The prime factorization is ...

... 2²×3×7×11

Single-digit prime factors are ... 2, 3, 7

Single-digit divisors are ... 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7

Find the slope first, use the formula (y₁-y₂)/(x₁-x₂)

[6-(-2)]/(-1-7) = 8/-8 -> -1              Therefore your slope (mx) is -x.

To find the y-intercept, you use one of the points and substitute it in the slope intercept formula: y=mx+b, using the slope you just found.

-2=-1(7)+b

-2=-7+b -> -2+7=b

b=5

In conclusion, your equation will be y=-x+5. I hope this helped ;)

9.36 is 0.001 more than 9.359

Both numbers round to the same value.

9.359 has greater precision.

K=0

brainiest plz eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Answer:

28 minutes.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can see from our graph that 12 minutes after starting the race Lynn left Kael behind and he ran at a greater speed till the race ended after 40 minutes.

To find total number of minutes Lynn ran faster than Kael we will subtract 12 from 40.

[tex]40-12=28[/tex]

Therefore, Lynn ran at a greater speed than Kael for 28 minutes.

Answer:

28 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Put 2 where x is:

h(2) = g(2+2) -1 = g(4) -1

_____

Put -2 where x is:

h(-2) = g(-2+2) -1 = g(0) -1

The function f(x) describes a parabola that opens downward. The only graph with that shape is the 2nd one.

_____

The degree of 2 on the x² term means there will be only 1 turning point (1 less than the degree). The bottom two choices have more turning points than that.

The minus sign on the coefficient of x² means the graph opens downward—that it tends toward -∞ when x gets very large in magnitude, either positive or negative.

5.13 is larger. Because it is closer to a whole number. That’s what I believe it is at least. Forgive me if I am wrong

Answer:

  x = 44

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a 2-step linear equation. Add the opposite of the constant (the one on the side with the variable term), then multiply by the inverse of the coefficient of the variable.

Add 5, then multiply by 4.

  x/4 -5 = 6 . . . . . given

  x/4 = 11 . . . . . . . add 5

  x = 44 . . . . . . . . multiply by 4

Answer:

x=44

Step-by-step explanation:

a) x=4 is 5 units to the right of x=-1.

y=12 is 4 units up from y=8.

Your point (-1, 8) is translated to (4, 12).

___

b) If the parent function f(x) = x is translated so it goes through (4, 12), the translated function can be written ...

... g(x) = f(x-4) +12 = (x -4) +12

... g(x) = x +8

Bobby built 12 forts

Answer:

12 forts

Step-by-step explanation:

6x2=12

Answer:

B. 0.075 in

Evan apparently divided by time. He might do that if he were not paying attention to units.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given rainfall rate is ...

... (1.5 in)/(60 s) = (1/40) in/s = 0.025 in/s

To find the rainfall in 3 s, you need to multiply rate by time:

... (0.025 in/s)×(3 s) = 0.075 in

If you keep the rate and time in terms of minutes, then you have:

... (1.5 in/min)×(0.05 min) = 0.075 in

_____

Evan apparently divided, instead. His number is not inches.

... (1.5 in/min)/(0.05 min) = 30 in/min² . . . . not the appropriate units for the problem

The correct amount of rain that fell in 3 seconds at Brasse Terre, Guadalupe, is 0.075 inches, as calculated by multiplying the rate of 1.5 inches per minute by 0.05 minutes. Evan made an error leading to answer D, which is incorrect.

In 1970, a record 1.5 inches of rain fell in one minute. To find out how much rain fell in 3 seconds, which is 0.05 of a minute, we need to multiply the rate of rainfall by the fraction of the minute we are interested in. The calculation is as follows:

1.5 inches/minute x 0.05 minute = 0.075 inches

Evan seems to have misunderstood the calculation, leading to answer D, but the correct amount of rain that fell in 3 seconds is 0.075 inches, which corresponds to option B.

The most accurate way to estimate 33% of 52 is explained as follows:

To find a percentage, we calculate it as follows:

a% of b [tex]=\frac{a}{100} \times b[/tex]

Now, lets convert 33% into fraction first:

33% [tex]=\frac{33}{100} =0.33[/tex]

Now,

[tex]0.33 \times 52=17.16 \approx 17[/tex]

We have two ways to calculate the same so we will compare the values of them and figure out which gives a value nearer to our actual value:

So, [tex]\frac{1}{3} \times51=17[/tex] and [tex]\frac{1}{3} \times 53=17.66[/tex]

We can see that the first method gives us a value which is far closer to the actual value.

Therefore, [tex]\frac{1}{3} \times 51[/tex] is the most accurate way to estimate 33% of 52.

The future value (A) of a one-time investment of principal amount P at interest rate r compounded n times per year for t years is ...

... A = P(1 +r/n)^(nt)

Putting your given numbers into the formula, we have

... 876.34 = 300(1 +.06/4)^(4t)

Taking logarithms, this becomes the linear equation

... log(876.34) = log(300) + 4t·log(1.015)

Solving for t in the usual way, we get

... log(876.34) -log(300) = 4t·log(1.015) . . . . . . . subtract the constant term on the right

... (log(876.34) -log(300))/(4·log(1.015)) = t ≈ 18.00 . . . . divide by the coefficient of t

It will take 18 years for the $300 CD to reach a value of $876.34.

Answer:

[tex]m=-18[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

1. The line contains the points (34,12) and (32,48). Then, you need to use the slope formula, which is:

[tex]m=\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}[/tex]

2. When you substitute values into the formula, you obtain:

[tex]y_{2}=48\\y_{1}=12\\x_{2}=32\\x_{1}=34[/tex]

[tex]m=\frac{48-12}{32-34}\\m=\frac{36}{-2}\\m=-18[/tex]

The number when the quotient of 5 times a number and 7 is equal to 10 will be 15. The correct option is D.

A quotient in mathematics is the amount created by dividing two numbers. The term "quotient" is used frequently in mathematics and is sometimes known as the integer portion of a division, a fraction, or a ratio.

It is given that the quotient of 5 times a number and 7 is equal to 10. The number will be calculated as below:-

15 divided by 5 is 3 and 3+7 is equal to 10.

Therefore, the number when the quotient of 5 times a number and 7 is equal to 10 will be 15. The correct option is D.

To know more about quotient follow

https://brainly.com/question/673545

#SPJ2

Answer:

x = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

3x -8 =8x +4/2

3x -8 =8x +2

3x -3x -8 = 8x -3x +2 (subtract 3x both sides )

-8 = 5x +2

-8-2 =5x+2 -2  (subtract 2 both sides )

-10 =5x

-10/5 = 5x/5 (divide 5 both sides)

-2 = x

Hello,

Question:

Keisha solved the following equation:

4x − 2x + 8 = 6(x + 4)

Which step has an incorrect justification? (Make sure to type only the number of the step into the blank: 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5)

Correct Solution:

x − 2x + 8 = 6(x + 4)

4x + −2x + 8 = (6) (x) + (6) (4) (Distribute)

4x + −2x + 8 = 6x + 24

(4x + −2x) + (8) = 6x + 24 (Combine Like Terms)

2x + 8 = 6x + 24

2x + 8 = 6x + 24

Subtract 6x from both sides.

2x + 8 − 6x = 6x + 24 − 6x

−4x + 8 = 24

Subtract 8 from both sides.

−4x + 8 − 8 = 24 − 8

−4x = 16

-4 x -4 = 16

x = -4

Answer:

Where keisha went wrong was forgeting to subtract 6x to both sides.

Incorrrect step is #3

The solution to the equation is correct.

on the line - 4x + 8 = 24 to the next line

- 4x = 16

4 should be Subtraction property of equality and not addition property of equality

A

this is a geometric sequence since there exists a common ratio r between the terms

r = [tex]\frac{21}{7}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{63}{21}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{189}{63}[/tex] = 3

B

to obtain the next term in the sequence multiply the previous term by 3

[tex]a_{n+1}[/tex] = 3 [tex]a_{n}[/tex] ← recursive rule

C

the n th term of a geometric sequence is

[tex]a_{n}[/tex] = [tex]a_{1}[/tex] [tex]r^{n-1}[/tex]

where [tex]a_{1}[/tex] is the first term in the sequence

[tex]a_{n}[/tex] = 7 × [tex]3^{n-1}[/tex] ← explicit rule

Hello there,

So you have two fractions 2/5 and 1/4, but none of them have the same denominator... However a LCD that you can get from both of these is 20, so if you multiplied 4 on the top and the bottom for 2/5, you would get 8/20, and for 1/4, multiply 5 on the top and the bottom, and soon you end up with 5/20. If you added these two fractions together, now knowing that they have the same denominator... you would end up with 13/20 which is the answer to your problem.

Hope this was helpful for you :)

Graph this compound inequality 2.5 is equal to or less than x is equal to or less than 4.5

2.5 <= x < = 4.5

We graph this inequality using number line.

Here x lies between 2.5  and 4.5

While graphing, we start with closed circle at 2.5 because we have equal symbol .

Then shade till 4.5. Use closed circle at 4.5.

The graph is attached below.

Answer:

its c

Step-by-step explanation:

for the rest of the question when it asks "which scenario fits the compound inequality?"

63 = 0.63×10² = 126/2 = 3×21 = √3969 = 77₈

The last is as a base-8 number.

63=60+3=31.5*2=63/100

Answer:

The correct answer is option A.

Step-by-step explanation:

For the given triangles to be similar the segment AD must be an altitude of ΔABC.

We can provide a theorem for the same:

If we draw an altitude from the right angle of any right triangle, then the two triangles formed are similar to the original triangle.

Also all the three triangles are similar to each other.

Like here, in the triangle ABC, we draw an altitude from A to the side BC, thus forming 2 triangles; ΔDBA and ΔDAC. These both will be similar to ΔABC.

So, by the theorem it is proven that  ΔABC is similar to ΔDBA.

Therefore, option A is correct.

You just need to use your test-taking skill to eliminate the wrong answers here.

There is no such thing as a "Congruent Angles Postulate," so the last two choices can be eliminated.

The AA Similarity Postulate refers to triangles, not angles, so the second choice can be eliminated.

That only leaves the (correct) first choice.

9g = 3(5g - 4)

3g = 5g - 4

3g - 5g = -4

-2g = -4

g = -4/-2 = 4/2

Answer: g = 2

Let's solve your equation step-by-step.

9g=3(−4+5g)

Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.

9g=3(−4+5g)

9g=(3)(−4)+(3)(5g)(Distribute)

9g=−12+15g

9g=15g−12

Step 2: Subtract 15g from both sides.

9g−15g=15g−12−15g

−6g=−12

Step 3: Divide both sides by -6.

−6g /-6=-12/-6

g=2

Answer:

g=2

(7)

if r perpendicular to s then angles 1,2,3,4=90 deg.

if t perpendicular to s then angles 5,6,7,8=90 deg.

If two different lines intersect a third line at the same angle then they must be parallel.

r and t intersect s at the angle 2=90 deg  and 6 = 90 deg, therefore r and t are parallel.

(6) use sum of angles in a triange =180 deg property.

first, the complement to 105 is an angle of 75 deg. then x=180-(24+75)=81 deg

x=81 deg

(5)

[tex]\angle STU=180-\angle STR=180- \angle SRT   \\\\\4x = 180-20=160\\\\x=40[/tex]

(4) sum of angles = 180 deg

62 +45 + k = 180

k = 180 -107  = 73

k = 73

(2k, k) and (3k, 4k)

Slope = (4k  - k )/(3k - 2k)

= 3k / k

= 3

Answer :

3

slope = 3

to calculate the slope (m ) use the gradient formula

m = ( y₂ - y₁ ) / (x₂ - x₁ )

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (2k, k) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (3k, 4k )

m = [tex]\frac{4k-k}{3k-2k}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3k}{k}[/tex] = 3

the answer to the question is a.) 5rr cm because 5rr is right on brainly i've had it