PLZ HELP
Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World. In 1733, Parliament ruled that an extra six cents must be added to the price of every gallon of molasses that did not come from an English source. If the colonists actually followed the rules of the Molasses Act, it would have terrible consequences. Molasses from French islands would now be too expensive—merchants could never make a profit. So they would have to turn to the English, who would surely raise their prices. This one law could cripple the entire North American trade with the sugar islands—if, that is, the colonists or the French followed the rules. But of course they did just the opposite. The Molasses Act accomplished nothing except to make Americans better smugglers. Yet the act was renewed again and again—until the crucial year of 1763. Just as the Molasses Act was due to expire, England completed its victory over France in the global contest known as the Seven Years’ War (the segment of that war fought in North America is often called the French and Indian War). To pay for the war, the prime minister decided to put some teeth into the legislation. Now called the Sugar Act, the law was designed to make sure the American colonists stopped smuggling and paid their sugar tax. Which details do the authors include to support the claim in this passage? Select three options. an explanation of the results of the Seven Years’ War an explanation of how the Molasses Act benefited colonists an explanation of what was being taxed and how much it cost an explanation of why the Americans smuggled molasses an explanation of why the British imposed the Sugar Act

i think the answer is letter a.

Answer:

C. Speeding

Explanation:

I thinks C is correct. If you read lines 6-8 it helps to understand that the word mostly means "speeding"

Part B:

Which phrase in paragraph 1 helps the reader understand the meaning of tearing?

C: "off to the other end of the ring"

Cotton Mather, a key figure in the Salem witch trials, included additional testimony and accounts of supernatural occurrences in his writings that were not presented at trial. His intent was to reinforce his beliefs and sway public opinion regarding the legitimacy of the trials.

The question refers to Cotton Mather, a minister and prominent figure in the Salem witch trials, and asks about additional evidence Mather includes in his accounts that was not presented at the trial. Mather's writings, such as his book 'The Wonders of the Invisible World', include additional testimony and personal observations not presented in court. These supplementary pieces of evidence often involve supernatural explanations and personal accounts of witchcraft activity.

Mather's purpose in including this information is often seen as an attempt to validate the witch trials, emphasizing the power of evil and the necessity of a moral and religious fight against it. His inclusion of additional evidence is therefore a combination of furthering his personal beliefs and influencing the public opinion toward acceptance of the trials' outcomes.

https://brainly.com/question/11333831

#SPJ3

My family communicates through text if I'm down stairs or calls me on the phone. We also communicate through "meetings" we have. I would say that it works and it's helpful. It doesn't really affect me. I still communicate the way I normally do.

Final answer:

My family values open discussions and active listening, with an emphasis on understanding the audience and refining communication patterns for effective dialogue.

Explanation:

In my family, communication is a dynamic process that involves a lot of open discussions and active listening. We usually have family meetings where everyone is encouraged to speak their mind and share their thoughts on different matters. This open communication style fosters an environment of trust and understanding. Furthermore, body language and non-verbal cues are significant in our conversations, complementing our verbal interactions. The impact of my family's communication style on me is profound; it has shaped me into a person who values clear, thoughtful expression and the importance of listening in effective communication.

Understanding our audience is crucial in our family; we consider social and cultural nuances when communicating with each other. By defining our intentions and considering the perspective of the listener, we ensure that the message is conveyed appropriately. Revising our communication patterns for more effective interactions is something we do regularly, aiming for a balance in our dialogue.

Yearly is an adverb. It ends in -ly and describes something. Brainliest??

In the sentence, the third option 'yearly' is the adverb.

Can you include a picture/screenshot of the chart?

Thanks.

Answer:

Explanation:

Generations

Answer:

A) Brainstorming.

Explanation:

Brainstorming is the first pre-writing method for a student to focus on, list and broaden the possibilities regarding the perspectives, opinions or ideas he/she is going to base his essay on.  

It is a helpful strategy that provides a clear goal for the analysis that is going to be developed in the essay.  

After brainstorming, the student can create an outline for the essay, write the first draft, and proofread it to obtain a final draft.

Philip Yancey believes the reason to be comforted after God allows man one hour of suffering in an entire lifetime of good feeling, is the fact that life on Earth lasts just for a short time in comparison with the wonderful future God has for man in heaven, living in eternity.

Answer:

The author tells us that our time on earth is nothing compared to the time we will have with Christ in heaven because we will be worshiping God for eternity in heaven.

Explanation:

hope this helps

YOLOBROLO

One

It really isn't change that is the problem. Change of locale only triggers the problem which is shyness. Shyness isn't the problem either, really. It's what behavior is brought about once the shyness is triggered.  I also think that shyness makes new friendships hard to establish. I think the best answer is probably the last one or the first one. It's very hard to pick. I'll go with the last.

Two: Scientific Writing

Anything to do with emotional writing is not the answer. That lets out B (most of the time). If you are trying to persuade that is not scientific writing. Scientific writing is just a presentation of the facts. Narrative writing is your second best answer. It is usually about an event. The best answer is expository writing which has a logical order and normally a conclusion. I'll go with D.

Three: Handwriting

Start with the last one. It is correct.

D might be true, but it would only be implied. It is not really mentioned at all in the paragraph. If you can only infer it, then it is not the best answer if you can get one that is actually stated.

B is incorrect. B is stated as mattering.

No where is it stated whether or not people care about their handwriting. I suppose it is true that you can judge personality by judging assessing handwriting. It's a big jump, but I'd pick A as your second answer.

Four: Information Essay.

Examples quite frequently use evidence. This is a time that I'm just going to give the answer. If you disagree, then use what you think.  

The interjection word you are looking for is B. Ah.

Answer:

the correct answer is B. Ah, because an interjection or exclamation in English is a word is a word, phrase, or sound used to express an emotion such as happiness, anger, sadness or surprise.  

One

This is one of those things where you pick the best of a poor lot. He's cautious and anxious. What says that? None of them so you have to pick a secondary characteristic of his. The ending depends on Scrooge being very particular about time and it would give him great pleasure if Bob Cratchet were but a few minutes late. If that's the answer, it must be C, but it is also unfair.

Two

The first one to have a participle is sleeping and eating.

The next one is entertaining (referring to Bruce)

The last one is undercooked.

Participles serve 1 of 2 purposes. They are verbs that act as adjectives or nouns and sometimes as part of a verb phrase. Sleeping and eating are nouns. Entertaining is an adjective referring to Bruce. Undercooked is also an adjective.

Three

As difficult as the first question was, this one could only have one good answer and that is A.  Answers like D should not even be a consideration. The last one is possible, but it depends on how it is given. Belle is the best example of the right way but the nephew is not far behind.

The correct answer is A) Film theory. Film theory is defined as theory developed to explain the nature of motion pictures and how they produce mental and emotional effects on the audience. The film theory helps to understand the relationship between the cinema, perception and the human body.

Some examples of theories are:

Film theory recognizes the cinema as a distinct art form.

Answer:

the answer is A. film theory

Explanation:

Beowulf's response to the watchman's challenge is confident and full of pride. He introduces himself as a protector, boasts of his previous successes, and aims to earn the watchman's trust by emphasizing his bravery and strength.

In lines 173-179 of the classic epic, Beowulf's response to the watchman's challenge is delivered with confidence and boastful pride. Beowulf introduces himself as a protector of the people and boasts of his previous successes in battles. He aims to convince the watchman of his intentions and to gain the watchman's trust. Emphasizing his heroism, generosity, and bravery, he responds boldly to the watchman’s challenge. This is a testament to his character that is consistently defined by courage, determination, and strength throughout the epic.

https://brainly.com/question/837576

#SPJ2

The words that the time clause “While they are seeking food” modifies are “insects and animals”. In this case, the time clause is adding information about the nouns it is modifying. Clauses are dependent sentences that need the main clause to complete its meaning.

Answer: Either Karen or Tim needs to help me make lunch.

Explanation: In the correct sentence, the verb (needs) is singular. When two subjects are separated by "or," the verb should agree with the subject closest to the verb. Both parts of the subject are singular, so the verb should be singular.

Final answer:

The sentence with correct subject-verb agreement is 'either Karen or Tim needs to help me make lunch.' This is because the verb agrees with the nearest subject 'Tim,' which is singular.

Explanation:

The sentence that shows correct subject-verb agreement is:

b. either Karen or Tim needs to help me make lunch.

This sentence follows the rule that when compound subjects are joined by or or nor, the verb agrees with the noun or pronoun closest to it. In this case, 'Tim' is closest to the verb, and since 'Tim' is singular, the verb 'needs' is also singular, thus making the sentence grammatically correct.

c

good luck u see i am going to write this extra 20 character so i can submit

Answer: The answer is indeed "economic struggle".

Explanation:

In the year of 1933, when "Why Beggars are Despised" was written by George Orwell, the Great Depression was doing the most damage. Unemployment reached a peak of 25% in the U.S., the drought continued in the Midwest, and people were desperately withdrawing their money from banks. In Europe, Adolf Hitler, now a chancellor of Germany, opened the first concentration camp - the second World War was still to come.

Orwell reflects on the reason why beggars are despised and comes to the conclusion that it is simply because they "fail to earn a decent living". A beggar, according to him, is not different than any other human being. He is "honest compared with the sellers of most patent medicines, high-minded compared with a Sunday newspaper proprietor, amiable compared with a hire purchase tout–in short, a parasite, but a fairly harmless parasite." The issue is, to the author's mind, that people don't really care if a person works or not, or if that person is honest or not. They care for - and despise if you don't have any - money.

The question evaluates English grammar, specifically verb tenses and subject-verb agreement. The correct grammar usage is seen in sentence A, 'In​ June, we will have been married for eighteen months' which uses the future perfect tense.

The subject of this question is English grammar, specifically focusing on the correct use of verb tenses and pronouns in sentence construction. The sentences presented are attempting to convey the same piece of information but vary in grammatical accuracy. The grammatically correct one is option A: 'In June, we will have been married for eighteen months.' In this sentence, the verb tenses are accurate (using the future perfect tense 'will have been') and the pronoun 'we' is subject-verb agreement suitable for referring to more than one person.

https://brainly.com/question/33729112

#SPJ2

B. It doesn’t provide any suggestions for improvement

Feedback during the peer review process should be helpful and allow the author of the paper to make necessary and important changes to the paper. Feedback that doesn't have any suggestions for improvement is not helpful.

Feedback does not need to include direct quotes from the paper. It also isn't required to give information about the paper's topic since it's about the writing not the paper's topic. It also should not describe the reviewer's opinion of the paper. The reviewer's opinion doesn't matter. The suggestions for improvement do.

Answer:

Explanation:

The idiom 'don't count your chickens before they hatch' is a warning not to assume success prematurely and to wait until an outcome is certain before making plans based on that outcome.

Meaning of the Idiom 'Don't Count Your Chickens Before They Hatch'

The idiom 'don't count your chickens before they hatch' advises against planning for or assuming success before the results are finalized. It implies caution not to rely too much on the anticipated outcome of something that is not yet certain. For example, expecting a significant amount of money from a deal that has not been concluded could lead to disappointment if the deal falls through. This idiom is one of many in the English language that suggest prudence and foresight in our actions and expectations.

Similar cautionary proverbs include 'look before you leap', which is a warning to consider the possible consequences before taking action, and 'there's many a slip 'twixt the cup and the lip', emphasizing that many things can go wrong between the start and the completion of a task. These idioms and proverbs play a significant role in offering wisdom and guidance based on common experiences and cultural knowledge.

Where is the poem I can’t answrr without poem

Irony best describes the resolution of The Pardoner's Tale

so your answer would be B

Answer: B) Irony

Explanation:

Given that the end of this story tells the fact that The Pardoner sells his forgiveness because he believes that the action of a man and the sanctity of his soul are things that can be separated. However, when men find gold, the rest of them in this story begin conspiring the deaths of each other. Finally, they die due to this obscene ambition, which can be understood as a great irony.

Ethos is the ethical appeal, which intends to persuade the audience of the author's credibility/character.

Answer:

By referencing trusted sources

Explanation:

(APEX)

B is your correct answer

Answer: B. While the data from medical research hasn't proven anything conclusively, an increasing number of studies indicate that there is a significant risk.

This sentence is being used as a rebuttal to a counterclaim. The counterclaim argues that the data from medical research has not proven anything conclusively. The author is addressing this concern, and acepting the truth of the statement. However, he also states that although nothing conclusive has been proven, an increasing number of studies indicate that there is a significant risk. This is an effective response to the counterclaim.

Teach for America provides passionate, motivated educators who can introduce new teaching approaches but may lack experience and subject expertise, potentially leading to a lack of continuity and high turnover due to short-term commitments and pressure.

Employing teachers from Teach for America comes with its advantages and disadvantages. On the pro side, schools gain access to passionate educators, often recent top college graduates, who bring enthusiasm and new perspectives to the classroom. Teach for America advocates for the concept that every student should have access to highly effective teachers, an aspiration that aligns with efforts to close the achievement gap in under-resourced schools. The vigor and innovative teaching strategies often associated with these teachers can contribute to student growth and achievement.

However, there are also cons. First, these teachers may only commit to a two-year teaching stint, which can result in a lack of continuity for students. Many Teach for America instructors may not have a background in education nor a specialized degree in the subjects they teach, unlike their counterparts in many high-performing international education systems. As well, the lack of long-term job security—echoed by policies from institutions like The Equity Project—can put immense pressure on teachers, potentially leading to burnout and high turnover rates that could disrupt the learning environment.

Answer:

Mark Antony's speech would sway me more.

Explanation:

Brutus and Mark Antony are characters in Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar". Brutus, Cassius, and others have betrayed and killed Caesar, the emperor of Rome. During Caesar's funeral, Brutus gives a speech. He is a good and skilled speaker, but his speech lacks emotion. It shows, instead, quite an egotistic attitude, as if he felt superior to Caesar:

As Caesar

loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at

it; as he was valiant, I honor him; but as he was ambitious,

I slew him.

On the other hand, Mark Antony's speech is filled with emotion. He truly honors Caesar, his friend and emperor. Mark Antony's also a skilled speaker and wittily shows the crowd that Brutus and Cassius are not good men. Even though he calls them "honourable", he does so ironically. He is skillfully revealing what he truly thinks of those noble men, yet not so blatantly as to expose his loyalty to Caesar to the point of getting himself killed. His speech would have swayed me because of his cleverness and subtlety, as well as his emotion:

Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;

And Brutus is an honourable man.

[...]

I thrice presented him a kingly crown,

Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?

Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;

And, sure, he is an honourable man.

I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke,

But here I am to speak what I do know.

You all did love him once, not without cause:

What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?

O judgment! thou art fled to brutish beasts,

And men have lost their reason. Bear with me;

My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,

And I must pause till it come back to me.

In the aftermath of Caesar's assassination, Mark Antony's speech likely held more sway among Romans due to his political tactics and connections to Caesar's legacy.

Brutus and Mark Antony were key figures in the aftermath of Julius Caesar's assassination, each delivering impactful speeches to sway public opinion. In this context, if you were a Roman citizen, you might have been more swayed by Mark Antony's speech due to his persuasive rhetoric and alliances with powerful figures like Caesar.

While Brutus was revered for his virtues and love of country, Mark Antony's political maneuvering and connection to Caesar's legacy likely held more immediate appeal to the Roman populace.

the speaker's character develops a emotion of loneliness and the feeling of being alone. And he's in a dark place of grief for the lost of his love Lenore.

Answer:

Poe chose to set in "The Crow" a melancholy and somber atmosphere to build a sad and lonely character.

Explanation:

The Raven is Edgar Allan Poe's most famous poem and even the history of literature. Published in 1845 under a pseudonym, verses dealing with loss and desire, death and hope, anguish and loneliness, are universally acclaimed and praised to this day.

They are precisely 108 verses that narrate the despair of the lyrical self that loses its beloved, Lenora. In his sad room, on a rainy day, a crow suddenly enters the narrator's house and rests on a statue (the bust of Pallas Athens, considered the goddess of Greek wisdom). The raven and the lyrical I then begin to dialogue.

Magic

realism is all about creating a setting in which the characters

experience magical elements as something common to their everyday

Answer:

The serious tone is an element of reflection over what is happening in the story.

Explanation:

Magical realism is serious fiction.The use of a serious tone gives magical realism a place for the reader to locate their real world.It comes from authors who describe life from a different perspective.The elements of magic convey the reality of different ways of looking at the world around us.That is why there is a serious tone

The only reference I can find to Tom referring to Nick in any way other than his name is as follows:

This idea is that we’re Nordics. I am, and you are, and you are, and ——” After an infinitesimal hesitation he included Daisy with a slight nod, and she winked at me again. “— And we’ve produced all the things that go to make civilization — oh, science and art, and all that. Do you see?”

Final answer:

Tom Buchanan doesn't have a specific nickname for Nick Carraway in 'The Great Gatsby.' Tom's interactions with Nick reflect his condescending and patronizing attitude. The characters' relationships are central to understanding the themes and societal commentary of the 1920s in Fitzgerald's novel.

Explanation:

In F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel The Great Gatsby, Tom Buchanan doesn't have a unique nickname or specific endearing term that he consistently uses to call Nick Carraway, the narrator of the story. However, it is worth noting that Tom's interactions with Nick are often condescending and patronizing, reflective of Tom's character as a member of the 'old money' elite.

Throughout the book, Tom exhibits a sense of superiority over others, including Nick, which can be seen in the way he addresses or refers to people.

The dynamics between characters in The Great Gatsby are complex, and Fitzgerald paints a vivid picture of the social intricacies and personal relationships during the 1920s. These relationships reveal much about the characters' personalities and societal values of the time.

Nick's perspective and relationships, including with Tom, offer a lens through which readers can understand the symbolism and themes that Fitzgerald weaves throughout the narrative.