Question 1:
The debate between rationalism and empiricism takes place in the branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of knowledge: epistemology. Rationalists argue that we can gain knowledge and experience independently of our senses. Sometimes, the information that we gain through senses is altered or redefined after its encounter with our preconceptions. Moreover, reason can sometimes provide additional information about the world that we cannot gain solely through our senses.
On the other hand, empiricists claim that all our concepts are ultimately derived from our senses, and that this is the only method we have to acquire knowledge. Empiricists are skeptical about the idea of reason as providing knowledge. Some empiricists also claim that if some knowledge is not backed by experience, then we do not really have it.
Question 2:
Freedom is a topic that is often discussed in philosophy, with various authors having very distinct interpretations. In the case of Sartre, total freedom is somewhat limited by responsibility for our actions. This means that we can carry out any type of action, as long as we are prepared to deal with the consequences that it would bring.
For example, we are free to commit a crime, as long as we do not care about the fact that we are affecting or damaging law-abiding citizens, that we might end up going to jail, and that we are undermining the legitimacy of our state and our laws. If we are not prepared to be held responsible for those consequences, then we need to act in a different way (abiding the law). Another example is that we are free to not attend post-secondary education. However, the consequences of this action would be having less opportunities for advancement. On the other hand, studying as an adult would have as consequences less time and money for engaging in other activities.This view manages to bring together the idea of absolute personal freedom with that of accountability.
Samuel has been criticizing the policies of the state government, which has led law enforcement officials to conduct a raid on his home. He could be protected, though, by which Constitutional Amendment? A) Eighth B) Fifth C) Second D) Third
the answer is the fifth amendment
Descendants of a group of former slaves live on their own island. They are not self-governed and speak their own language. Which choice best describes these people?
1) a nation
2) a state
3) a minority
4) a multinational state
its Nation
The answer that is correct is the following of 1.) A nation.
If it's not useful, feel free to report for mistake in answer. -_-
The descendants of a group of former slaves who live on their own island, speak their own language, and are not self-governed would best be described as option 3, a minority. This group does not meet the criteria for being a nation, state, or a multinational state, as they lack self-governance and defined sovereignty.
In the context of international relations and political science, a state refers to a political entity that possesses a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. A nation, on the other hand, signifies a group of people who share common cultural, linguistic, or ethnic characteristics. In some cases, a nation may aspire to self-rule and political autonomy, aiming to form a nation-state where the boundaries of the nation and state coincide. However, without self-governance and recognized sovereignty, such a group constitutes a minority within the broader political context.
A multinational state is a sovereign state which is viewed as comprising two or more nations. Such a state contrasts with a nation-state where a single nation accounts for the majority of the population. Given that the individuals in the question do not fulfill the requirements of a state or nation-state and are not a dominant group within a larger political entity, they align most accurately with the definition of a minority.
“Brinkmanship” is the practice of taking a dispute to the edge of conflict and
A. forcing the opposition to back down.
B. engaging in a military battle.
C.taking part in peace talks.
D.retreating to one’s own “corner.”
D.retreating to one’s own “corner.”
Answer:
A. forcing the opposition to back down.
Explanation:
This is the definition of the term "brinkmanship." Brinkmanship refers to the practice of trying to gain advantage over your opponent by pushing a dispute to the edge of conflict. The idea is that pushing the situation to the extreme is likely to force the opponent to back down and make concessions. For this strategy to work, diplomatic maneuvers need to be used in order to prove that there is no intention to back down. This strategy is particularly used in international politics and the military.
Despite being able to live peacefully amongst European settlers, why were even the civilized Indian tribes forced to relocate to reservations under the Dawes Act?
European Americans were hungry for land and feared the Native Americans.
The Native Americans sold off their land because they did not have enough funds to survive.
The Native Americans wanted more lands to use for hunting and trapping.
Civilized Native American tribes wanted to end migratory patterns.
The trail of tears was caused because the American settlers had been pressuring the federal government to remove Indians, mostly Cherokee and Chickasaw tribes, from the Southeast. Many settlers were settling on or around Indian lands, while others wanted more land to be available to European settlers. So, the correct answer would be A.
What is the diffrences of The sophisist and the ancent greece.
I had to research for you but here is the answer
was a specific kind of teacher in ancient Greece, in the fifth and fourth centuries BC. ... The classical tradition of rhetoric and composition refers more to philosophers like Aristotle, Cicero, and Quintilian than to the sophists.
Final answer:
The Sophists focused on individual achievement and teaching rhetoric and persuasion skills, while ancient Greece during the Classical Age made significant intellectual and cultural achievements.
Explanation:
The Sophists were influential thinkers in ancient Greece, specifically in Athens, who offered to teach rhetoric and persuasion skills to those seeking success as lawyers or politicians. Their focus was on individual achievement and they believed that there were no absolute truths. On the other hand, ancient Greece as a whole, during the Classical Age, made great intellectual and cultural achievements in areas such as philosophy, drama, scientific thought, and art. The Greeks influenced European and Middle Eastern culture, and their ideas continue to shape Western philosophy and political science.
After World War II, what three steps did the Western Allies and Soviets ta the Western Allies and Soviets take to ensure that Germany wouldn't again threaten the security of Europe
The three leaders of the Western Allies, met in the Postdam Conference in summer 1945 and reached certain agreements to ensure that Germany did not become a threaten anymore. The participants were the United Kingdom (represented by Winston Churchill and Clement Attlee), the United States (president Harry S. Truman) and the Soviet Union represented by Joseph Stalin.
They reached the following agreements according to how to administer Germany:
The German territory was divided in 4 occupation areas that would be under the control of US, UK, URSS and France respectively. Berlin, the capital was located inside the territory controlled by the URSS but it was also divided in four zones, each controlled by one of the allies.It was agreed that the objectives of this occupation had to be: demilitarization, denazification, construction of a democratic nation and power decentralization.All Nazi authorities would be judged and German anexations of territories reversed.which process is used by both historians and an archaeologist in their work
Answer:
The correct answer is Radiocarbon Dating.
Explanation:
This name is given to the method used to determinate the age of an object that contains organic material. The process uses the properties of radiocarbon and it was developed in the late 1940s by Willard Libby.
Its impact is currently known as the ''radiocarbon revolution'' because this fundamental method has allowed very important transitions in prehistory to be dated.
An example of it, is that it put the bases to determinate the end of the last ice age, and the beginning of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in different regions.
What do the discoveries at rome and pompeii tell us about daily life in the roman empire? in what significant respects did it differ form life today?
The discoveries at Rome and Pompeii are some of the most significant and representative sources of evidence that we have of life in the Roman Empire.
Pompeii was a Roman city that was buried under volcano ashes and debris following the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD. Rome, on the other hand, was the capital of the empire and it has been continually inhabited for centuries.
Thanks to these discoveries we have learned a lot about Ancient Rome. For example, we have been able to find out about the citizens' main economic activities, their diet, the way they built their houses and the type of art they used to decorate them with. We have also found out about their family life and their leisure activities.
Many things are different between life in Rome and Pompeii and life nowadays. For example, most people in the past worked in agriculture, which was their main source of sustenance. While a lot of people still work in that industry today, most people work in the service industry in cities. Houses are built with different materials and are generally larger and more stable. Also, topics that are represented in their art are now taboo in our society.
Final answer:
Discoveries in Rome and Pompeii illustrate key aspects of Roman daily life, from the structure of atrium houses to the significance of public games and the patriarchal society. These finds help us compare ancient societal norms with those of today, though significant differences are evident in technology, autonomy, and social structures.
Explanation:
Discoveries at Rome and Pompeii offer a unique window into the daily lives of people during the Roman Empire. The key features of an atrium house, such as the open central court for collecting rainwater, reflect a society that valued the idea of a self-contained domestic world. The grandeur of some houses and villas, with their intricate mosaics and frescoes, speak to the wealth and social stratification present in Roman society.
Architecture reflects the cultural importance of family and hospitality, with spaces designed for gatherings and demonstrating wealth to guests. The public games, like gladiator fights and chariot races, were significant social and political events, showcasing how leaders used entertainment to maintain public favor - similar to the concept of 'bread and circuses'.
Moreover, the Roman economy relied heavily on conquest and trade, with a complex system incorporating various goods from all over the known world. Understanding the patriarchal society in Rome is essential to appreciating the mirror between the family structure and the Roman government.
The ruins of Pompeii, buried under ash after the eruption of Mount Vesuvius, provide an unmatched level of preservation, giving insight into everything from domestic life to societal structures of the era.
While modern life is vastly different in terms of technology and democratic structures, there are still parallels with the importance of family, societal stratification, and the role of entertainment in society. Nevertheless, the level of autonomy and freedom enjoyed in most modern societies contrasts starkly with the lives of those who were enslaved in ancient Rome, where slavery was an integral part of societal and economic structures.
Identify the key differences between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution. Then explain which document created the better system of government for the new nation, and support your response with the differences you have identified.
22 POINTS + WILL RATE BRAINLEST!!!!!
Well to start the articles of confederation gave the states too much power although it was made by the same people. the Articles calls Congress unicameral and the Constitution calls Congress bicameral witch is divided into the House of Representative.
How do limited resources affect trade
Limited resources drive trade by requiring regions to exchange goods where they are scarce. Principles of comparative advantage and specialization show that trade boosts production and proper resource utilization, but trade restrictions can harm economic efficiency. The scarcity of resources eventually limits geographical expansion and substitution, underscoring the importance of trade in managing these limitations.
Limited resources affect trade by necessitating the exchange of goods and services between regions where certain resources are scarce. In a world of scarce resources and unlimited desires, even individuals with vast wealth must make choices that imply trade-offs. When regions lack certain resources, they must trade to satisfy demands that cannot be met domestically. This concept is built upon the principles of comparative advantage and specialization, which suggest that trade enhances the production of goods and services and allows for more efficient use of resources. However, when restrictions are imposed on international trade, these advantages are undermined, leading to reduced production efficiencies and potential economic loss.
The scarcity of resources influences the terms of trade, as demonstrated by the relative quantities of goods available during exchanges. Scarcity means that there are limits to the effectiveness of methods we have developed to cope with a lack of resources. Over time, as unexploited geographical areas become limited and as certain resources reach their physical limits, the room for maneuvers such as geographic expansion and substitution narrows dramatically, making trade even more essential.
Which role is the president performing when he or she lays a wreath during Memorial Day ceremonies at Arlington National Ceremony?
The president is performing a ceremonial or symbolic role, paying respects to fallen soldiers during Memorial Day ceremonies at Arlington National Cemetery.
When the President lays a wreath during Memorial Day ceremonies at Arlington National Cemetery, they are undertaking a symbolic and ceremonial role. This solemn act is a powerful gesture of respect and remembrance for the men and women who sacrificed their lives in military service. The wreath-laying ceremony is deeply rooted in tradition and serves as a visual representation of the nation's gratitude for the sacrifices made by members of the armed forces.
The President's participation in this ceremony underscores the significance of Memorial Day as a day of reflection, honoring the courage and dedication of those who gave their lives in service to their country. The act of laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, in particular, symbolizes the collective reverence for all those who remain unidentified but are remembered with deep appreciation and solemnity.
hich two events took place after the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989?
The Tiananmen Square protests or the 4th June Incident (as it is called in China) took place in 1989. It was a movement of protest led by students in Beijing, the capital of the People's Republic of China. In Western countries, this event is alternatively called the Tiananmen Square Massacre, due to the violent repression of the demostrations exercised by troops with automatic guns and tanks, that started shooting at the protesters.
Times of changes and unbalances were taking place in China, where a set of reforms had been implemented during the 1980s, aiming to switch the economic model of the country towards a market economy. The students started to question the goverment of the Communist party and claimed for democracy, freedom of press, freedom of speech, accountability, etc. At some point, a group of students organized a hunger strike that was massively supported, and the protests spread to 400 cities within the country. This was the moment in which the goverment decided to use force to supress the threat.
After the massacre, China was punished by the international community through economic sanctions and embargoes. Inside the country, the road towards economic liberalization slowed down, important restrictions on the right of freedom of speech were established, settling a careful control of news coverage within the country (for example, foreign journalists were expelled). The role of police was strengthened and officials who had supported the protests were purged.
Answer:it is c and d
Explanation:
Becos I did it
During the Cold War, the world feared the devastation that nuclear weapons could cause. Which action was ta ken with regard to this concem?
In order to stop the devastation that nuclear weapons could cause during the Cold War, various treaties and agreements were signed between the countries of two blocks. The treaties and agreements include :
Limited Test Ban Treaty ( LTBT ) 1963.Outer Space Treaty 1967.Strategic Arms Limitation Talk (SALT 1 ) 1968.Nuclear Proliferation Treaty ( NPT ) 1968.Detente.How did Theodore Roosevelt convince a government of Columbia to agree to give the US control over the land where the Panama Canal would be bulit
The U.S. supported (fostered) a revolt by Panamanian separatists in Columbia. The war only lasted a few hours and Panama became a separate nation that the U.S. dominated. They paid Panama a few million dollars for 100 year rights to the Canal Zone.
He couldn't, so instead he encouraged Panama to rebel and form a new nation.(APEXS)Hope it helps:))
How does American democracy balance the power of majority rule? by forcing all people to pay taxes by making people work for the common good by giving jobs to all people by insisting on minority rights
The correct answer is D) by insisting on minority rights.
American democracy balances the power of majority rule by insisting on minority rights.
The United States government pays attention to taking into consideration the necessities of minorities in America. If the concept of majority rules is not balanced, then everything is charged to one side creating an unbalance that is no good for any society, because the other side would have some kind of reaction that most of the times are through protest and rebellion. That is why under the majority rule it is very important to never displace the minorities.
Answer:
by insisting on minority rights
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :)
What is the point at which supply and demand intersect? equilibrium point disequilibrium point excess supply point excess demand point
Equilibrium Point.
Hope this helped!
At option A: equilibrium point in which supply and demand intersect means the demand and supply meet with each other.
What is Equilibrium point about?An equilibrium point is defined as the point in which the demand and supply of particular goods that are produced by the manufacture will be same.
Once this point is reach, the producers will able to earn the profits on their demand availability.
Under the industry the companies whose availability of goods are equal to the customer demands that companies can easily grow and meet the competition in the market.
Therefore, correct option is A.
Learn more about Demand, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14480955
In 1920, women achieved the political right to vote, and yet the struggle for economic rights continued due to which of the following? Select all that apply.
A. Constitutional amendments prevented women from working.
B. Traditional family roles discouraged women from working outside the home.
C. Employers were forced to give women higher salaries.
D. The Supreme Court repeatedly upheld gender discrimination.
Discrimination: 1. D Racial attitudes and policies had been a part of American life for a long time and were not going to change easily
2. A, B, C Guatemala, Mexico, Puerto Rico
3. B, D Traditional family roles discouraged women from working outside the home and The Supreme Court repeatedly upheld gender discrimination
Answer:
B, D
-Traditional family roles discouraged women from working outside the home
-The Supreme Court repeatedly upheld gender discrimination
Explanation: