Answer:
The hearings are so contentious because the decisions they make can affect millions of people and for many years to come. The stakes of a president succeeding or failing to win a preferred candidate's seat are very high.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court rules on cases that affect the everyday life of the US citizens and even rule on cases involving other countries or foreigners. Most of such decisions involve fundamental rights in the Constitution, such as right to equality, right to freedom, right to freedom or religion, etc. When a president succeeds to appoint a Supreme Court justice, he or she will make a decision based based on his or her political views or preferences. If the president is a conservative or a liberal, he or she will pick a justice accordingly as well. Therefore, the Supreme Court which is formed by 9 justices who have life tenure (they serve until the die or resign), could be balanced either to the left side (liberals or democrats) or to the right side (conservatives or republicans).
The contention in Supreme Court hearings occurs due to the significant impact that a single justice appointment can have on the country's laws and policies. The success of a president in securing the seat for a preferred candidate can influence the long-term direction of the country aligning with their ideology.
Explanation:Supreme Court hearings often become contentious due to the impact the decisions of the court have on the nation's laws and the lives of its citizens. The ideological balance of the court can tip with the addition or replacement of just a single justice, which makes each appointment critical. This often leads to partisan questioning during hearings.
On the other hand, the success or failure of a president in appointing a preferred candidate has far-reaching implications. Succeeding in getting the preferred candidate appointed can lead to the passing of laws and policies that align with the president's or party's ideology, thus influencing the country's direction even long after the end of their term. Conversely, failure to secure the preferred candidate's seat could be a blow to the president's or party's policy aspirations.
Learn more about Supreme Court hearings here:https://brainly.com/question/13557795
#SPJ3
According to the online article about Algeria, rai is a __________.
A.
religious holiday
B.
game
C.
type of music
D.
type of food
Answer:
The answer is C) type of music
Answer: c
Explanation:
What conclusion can you draw about the revolution
from the photo and the background information?
a) Most of the protesters were soldiers.
b) Most of the protesters were soldiers' families.
c) Most of the protesters were men.
d) Most of the protesters supported the government.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It looks to me that the number of people of either gender were about equal. Still the ones holding the banners were women, and from the banners, it looks like they were the most concerned about how their families were to be fed.
I would pick B.
Answer:
b
Explanation:because its right
Which of the following results in an increase in the standard of living?
A. An increase in unemployment pushes down the cost of
production
B. Income increases, enabling consumers to buy more goods and
services.
C. Rising production costs drive up the price of goods and services.
D. Wages go up to correct for the inflation of prices.
Answer:
B. Income increases, enabling consumers to buy more goods and
services.
Explanation:
An increase in the standard of living would come with an increase in the income. By increasing your income, you open your possibilities of what you can acquire. For example, if you increase the income from a certain society without modifying the costs of the goods, then people eventually will buy more goods and services. In economics there’s the statement that “with higher consumption levels, there is greater prosperity”.
Final answer:
The option that leads to an increase in standard of living is income increases, which enable consumers to buy more goods and services. This direct effect of increased purchasing power contributes to an enhanced standard of living.
Explanation:
When considering which of the given options results in an increase in the standard of living, we need to understand the economic impacts of each option:
An increase in unemployment, which might push down production costs, does not inherently increase the standard of living, because the benefits of lower production costs may not be passed on to consumers, and higher unemployment can lead to a weaker economy overall.Income increases allow consumers to purchase more goods and services, directly contributing to an enhanced standard of living.Rising production costs typically lead to higher prices for goods and services, which can decrease the standard of living if wages do not keep up with these costs.Wages rising to correct for inflation simply maintains purchasing power rather than increasing it, so it does not actually increase the standard of living, it just prevents it from falling.Hence, the answer is B. Income increases, enabling consumers to buy more goods and services.
The Renaissance encouraged people to:
Answer:
encouraged many Church reformers, such as Martin Luther, and they later broke with Rome and divided Europe into two confessional camps, Protestantism and Catholicism.
Answer:
Read and write, travel extensively, and learn Latin.
Explanation:
The Renaissance encouraged people to read and write, travel extensively, and learn Latin.
“He who trusts any man with supreme power gives it to a wild beast, for such his appetite sometimes makes him: passion influences those in power, even the best of men, but law is reason without desire. . . . “ (Aristotle). Which feature of modern Western democratic government reflects Aristotle’s views as quoted?
A.) the requirement that government actions must adhere to the law
B.) the direct election of members of the legislature
C.) the power of the courts to review the law
D.) the granting of emergency powers to the chief executive
Letter A is the correct answer.
The requirement that government actions must adhere to the law. Even though men in power are corruptible due the passion that influences them, the law can never be. Passions may lead people to wrongdoings but the law has no desires and the government should adhere to the law and act accordingly.
The correct answer is A) the requirement that government actions must adhere to the law.
The feature of modern Western democratic government that reflects Aristotle’s views as quoted is the requirement that government actions must adhere to the law.
Since ancient Greece times it was well known that power changed people. And people in power needs institutions that regulate their functions. If not, power begets dictators, and dictators commit atrocities with their citizens. So that is why Aristotle considered that "but the law is reason without desire." It had no passion and it must be enforced fairly to everyone.
The Great strike of 1877
A) was bloodier than most Civil war battles.
B) Underscored the tension produced by rapid industrialization.
C) Shattered the myth of worker solidarity.
D) proved the theory of Social Darwinism.
Someone please help, I’m not sure what the answer is for this one, anything helps. Thank you !!
E) demonstrated how effective the knights of labor could be in organizing workers.
what did the wages do in the late 19th centry
Answer and Explanation:
The 19th century saw large amounts of social change; slavery was abolished, and the First and Second Industrial Revolution led to massive urbanization and much higher levels of productivity, profit and prosperity. European imperialism brought much of Asia and almost all of Africa under colonial rule.
Why would people be willing to risk their lives for democracy
Answer:
Democracy is not just the ability of citizens to vote for the candidates they want. It is not even the simple fact that the government responds to the will of the people. Democracy is a form of political organization that respects its citizens, their lives, their freedom, their property and their principles.
The possibility of choosing, of saying what we thought, of educating ourselves, of making decisions freely, we owe to democracy. America, as a democracy, guarantees these rights and many more for its citizens, but there are authoritarian countries that do not, in which their inhabitants suffer from their lack of rights.
Without the right to freedom, no life is complete, so many citizens risk their lives to obtain it. Some do so by fleeing, such as Cubans who risk their lives in rafts in the middle of the ocean, but others do so by fighting tyrant governments, giving their lives to obtain or defend democracy around the world.
After World War II, American policymaker George Kennan came up with the idea of containment, which stressed stopping the further spread of communism using financial and military means. The Korean War was an example of the use of military force to contain communism. The Marshall Plan was an example of using financial resources to stop the spread of communism. In your opinion, which method was more effective in containment? Why
Answer:
The Marshall Plan.
Explanation:
It gave stability (Money and aid) back to the countries that were decimated by the War.
Military:
Financial aid would not have stopped the military invasion of South Korea. South Korea is a democracy today because of our military intervention.
Financial:
Communism can take root only in societies that are unstable. The Marshall Plan stabilized many countries, making a radical ideology, such as communism, unattractive to the people of those countries.
The Marshall Plan protected more countries than military intervention could.
In a factory that produces jeans, one worker cuts out the pieces of fabric based on a pattern, another worker sews the
pieces together, another adds the zipper, another steams the fabric, and so forth. This is an example of
communism
Import substitute industrialization
division of labor
comparative advantage
Answer:
In a factory that produces jeans, one worker cuts out the pieces of fabric based on a pattern, another worker sews the
pieces together, another adds the zipper, another steams the fabric, and so forth. This is an example of division of labor -fourth choice
Answer:
C.) division labor
Explanation:
division of labor as the most efficient means of production that is used by having several workers involved in factory production
We’re women ever emperors of China?
Answer: so yes
Explanation:WU how was an emporor
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Women, even when they were in power in China, were never termed as "Emperors". In this case, the women leaders were given the coined term "Empress", which is a lady emperor that ruled the lands.
~
Which of the following is NOT true about Nelson Mandela?
He was a farmer.
He led massive peaceful protests against apartheid.
He, along with others, started the African National Congress.
He was imprisoned for over 20 years.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Although Mandela later became associated with the African National Congress, he was not one of its original founders.
Mandela was indeed a farmer, led protests against Apartheid, and was imprisoned for 27 years.
What is the percentage of migrant workers are from Mexico? In the 1970
What was one impact of the British abolition movement during the 19th
century?
O
A. It succeeded in convincing the British government to outlaw
slavery decades before the United States did.
O
B. It was the first major antislavery movement to rely on legal, rather
than religious, arguments against slavery.
O
C. It was a capitalist economic movement that argued that it cost
more to allow slavery than it did to end it.
O
D. It ended slavery in Great Britain itself, but not in any of its colonial
territories around the world,
Answer:
It succeeded in convincing the British government to outlaw
slavery decades before the United States did. -A.
The correct option is (A) It succeeded in convincing the British government to outlaw slavery decades before the United States did.
After the Civil War started out in 1861, abolitionists rallied to the Union cause. They had a good time while President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, putting forward the slaves unfastened in lots of elements of the South. In 1865, the thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolished slavery withinside the country.Effect of the British abolition motion at some point of the 19thcentury-In the gap of simply forty six years, the British authorities outlawed the slave change that Britain had created and went directly to abolish the exercise of slavery during the colonies. John Oldfield suggests how this countrywide marketing campaign have become one of the maximum a success reform moves of the nineteenth century.Learn more about the British abolition movement https://brainly.com/question/9016444
#SPJ2
What statement was true about the English and French colonies?
Answer:
Need to know the statements first, to answer if it's true or not. Sorry about that.
Explanation:
Answer:
They would all turn out to be independent countries one day.
Explanation:
The English colonies turned out to the the Unites States of America, and the French colonies turned out to be Canada.
Explain what you think Machiavelli is saying. Do you agree or disagree with him
Well, I'm not sure what passage you're talking about, but a lot of his writings reflect on the idea that the ends justify the means, which means you can kill and torture as long as you think the end result is worth it, which would make sense, since he sided with the Medici's, basically the first mob family. If you're talking about "it is better to be feared than to be loved," he's talking about your stance according to the public. I personally believe that neither of these statements are morally sound because they eerily remind me of Hitler, but to each his own.
Machiavelli's "The Prince" is a political treatise written in the 16th century by Italian philosopher and writer Niccolò Machiavelli. It is a guidebook for rulers on how to acquire and maintain political power. The book is divided into chapters that cover various aspects of leadership and governance.
Machiavelli argues that leaders should be practical and realistic, rather than guided solely by moral or idealistic principles. He suggests that leaders should base their decisions on a clear assessment of the current situation and act accordingly.
Agreements with Machiavelli's ideas:
1. Realism in politics: Many agree with Machiavelli's emphasis on the need for leaders to be practical and realistic in their approach to politics. They argue that leaders should base their decisions on a clear assessment of the current situation, rather than being guided solely by moral or idealistic principles.
2. Flexibility and adaptability: Machiavelli's ideas about the importance of leaders being adaptable and willing to change their strategies to suit the circumstances are also seen as valuable. In a complex and ever-changing political landscape, the ability to adjust one's approach can be crucial for maintaining power and achieving desired outcomes.
Learn more about Machiavelli here:
https://brainly.com/question/672909
#SPJ2
The complete question is, "Explain what you think Machiavelli is saying known for his book "The Prince". Do you agree or disagree with him"
Some young drivers make more mistakes because they have a greater interest in __________.
A. taking risks
B. learning from their driving experiences
C. avoiding distractions on the road
Answer:
A. taking risks
Explanation:
Some young drivers make more mistakes because they have a greater interest in taking risks.
Young drivers usually make more mistakes due to their greater interest in taking risks. They are often impulsive and underestimate the consequences of their actions, leading to risky behaviors such as speeding or neglecting safety procedures.
Explanation:This question indicates that more mistakes are made by young drivers due to their greater interest in taking risks. Young people are often attracted to risks and might take impulsive decisions while driving, leading to mistakes. Although some young drivers might learn from their driving experiences or try to avoid distractions on the road, it's the risk factor that typically results in more mishaps.
For instance, since young drivers are more prone to experiments and often underestimate the consequences, they may be more likely to speed, follow too closely, or neglect to wear seatbelts. All these risky behaviors can contribute to more driving mistakes.
Learn more about Young Drivers here:https://brainly.com/question/36453172
#SPJ3
African Americans who settled in the Plains region of the United States were
known by what name?
A. Exodusters
B. Scalawags
C. Maroons
D. Carpetbaggers
SHIRT
Thanks for submitting your question to Brainly!
African Americans who settled in the Plains region of the United States were known as Exodusters.
Answer:
Exodusters
Explanation:
Put these events in the correct order in which they occurred during Carter’s presidency. Borrowing declined. Interest rates rose. Inflation dropped, slowing the economy.
Answer: 2,1,3
Explanation:
The correct order in which they occurred during Carter’s presidency.
Interest rates rose. Borrowing declinedInflation droppedWhat issue hurt Carter's presidency?On November 4, 1979, Iranian militants stormed the United States Embassy in Tehran and took approximately seventy Americans captive. This terrorist act triggered the most profound crisis of the Carter presidency and began a personal ordeal for Jimmy Carter and the American people that lasted 444 days.
What economic problems did Carter's presidency have?The massive inflation and oil crisis of the 1970s damaged Jimmy Carter's presidency.
To learn more about Carter’s presidency, refer
https://brainly.com/question/17087215
#SPJ2
Select all that apply.
Why did some people oppose women's right to vote?
because they believed women were too emotional to vote
because women could not read or write
because women were superior to men
because they believed that women needed to be protected from political life
Answer:
because they believed that women needed to be protected from political life ( last choice)
because they believed women were too emotional to vote ( first choice)
Answer: because they believed that women needed to be protected from political life and because they believed women were too emotional to vote, I do so believe.
men i swear *sigh* hope this helps T-T
with the passage _____, tariffs among the United States, Mexico, and Canada were reduced.
Answer:
NAFTA
Explanation:
NAFTA was an agreement between the 3 North American countries to promote trading with each other and it has worked very effectively so far.
Answer:
NAFTA was an agreement between the 3 North American countries to promote trading with each other and it has worked very effectively so far.
Explanation:
How did the Vietnam War affect immigration to the United States in the 1970s?
-Asian immigration increased because many Vietnamese people escaped the chaos and violence after the war.
-Only a few children emigrated from Vietnam because families of US service personnel faced restrictive policies.
-War refugees were kept from entering the country because they were considered illegal immigrants.
-Fewer Vietnamese people were interested in immigrating to the United States in the wake of the war.
The correct answer is A) Asian immigration increased because many Vietnamese people escaped the chaos and violence after the war.
The Vietnam War affect immigration to the United States in the 1970s in that Asian immigration increased because many Vietnamese people escaped the chaos and violence after the war.
The Vietnam War confronted Noth Vietnam, supported by the Soviet Union and South Vietnam, supported by the United States. The Russians wanted to spread Communist in the region and the United States wanted to stop it. Rochard Nixon ordered the withdrawal of the US troops in 1973 and North Vietnam ended up winning the war in 1975, unifying the country as the Socialist Republic of Vietnam in 1976.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
In the 70s, Pakistan and India played only 3 matches against each other. How many did Pakistan won?
Answer:
1 or 2
Explanation:
i don't know i just guest
Answer:
2
Explanation:
India and Pakistan have a well-known rivalry when it comes to cricket. Both nations have excellent teams, and the sport is very popular in both regions. During the 1970s, Pakistan and India played only 3 matches against each other. The first one was a draw. In the second one (Lahore), Pakistan won by 8 wickets. Finally, in the third one (Karachi), Pakistan also won by 8 wickets.
5.
How have the ancient and much older land routes contributed to exchange of ideas and
goods? Explain
Answer:
Tran saharan trade
Explanation:
This trade allowed the white to gain goods from africa especially west africa along with north africa which allowed them to gain the goods like oil and other products today
The Warren Court further defined the separation of church and state in what two cases?
Answer:
The correct answer is Everson v. Board of Education, Lemon v. Kurtzman and Agostini v. Felton.
Explanation:
This cases were the one that really made the court to apply the first amendment religous liberties.
how did railroads change where people lived ?
Answer:
So the people had better transportation and better timing.
Explanation:
Answer:the invention of the railroad allowed people to move harvests at a faster spend allowing them to move more at a time
Explanation:
From which city did
General Burgoyne march
his troops to Saratoga?
Answer:
Burgoyne marched into New York from Canada
Explanation:
General Burgoyne marched his troops to Saratoga from the city of St. Johns in present-day Quebec, Canada during the American Revolutionary War in 1777.
Explanation:General John Burgoyne marched his British troops to Saratoga from St. Johns, a city located in present-day Quebec, Canada. This march was part of the Saratoga campaign during the American Revolutionary War in 1777, which aimed at gaining control over the Hudson River valley. Despite the initial successes, Burgoyne's campaign ultimately ended in defeat at the Battle of Saratoga, a turning point in the war.
Learn more about Saratoga Campaign here:https://brainly.com/question/33243956
#SPJ2
How did the Panic of 1819 create conflict between members of the Democratic-
Republican Party?
O
A. Northern industrialists wanted high tariffs, southern plantation owners
did not
O
B. Southern plantation owners wanted a national bank; northerner
industrialists did not.
C. Southern plantation owners wanted to abolish debtors' prisons;
northerner industrialists did not
D
Northern industrialists wanted more states' rights: southern plantation
owners did not.
The Panic of 1819 deepened division and conflict within the Democratic-Republican Party. Northern industrialists supported protective tariffs and a strong national bank while Southern plantation owners were in opposition due to their reliance on trade and their belief these policies favored industrialists.
Explanation:The Panic of 1819 was a significant economic crisis in the United States that brought an end to the era of the so-called 'Good Feelings'. One of its major political impacts was the deepened division and conflict amongst members of the Democratic-Republican Party.
A major cause of the Panic was the practices of the Second Bank of the United States, which had recently tightened its lending policies and called in many of its existing loans. This led to widespread financial hardships and foreclosures. Northern industrialists and Southern plantation owners, who were greatly affected by these policies, had different viewpoints on the role of the national bank and federal monetary policies.
Members of the Party who were Northern industrialists focused primarily on protective tariffs and a strong national bank to support their industrial activities. On the other hand, Southern plantation owners, who relied heavily on trade of their agricultural goods and were opposed to policies that they felt disproportionately favored industrialists, were against such high tariffs and a strong national bank.
Learn more about Panic of 1819 here:https://brainly.com/question/13308389
#SPJ3
20 POINTS!!!! PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! HELP!!!
Some issues that Americans disputed in the 1800s are still controversial today. Which of the following continues to be an issue today and contributed to the divisions that caused the Civil War?
A. Some people support states' rights, while others believe that the federal government should hold more power.
B. Some people believe that the "mudsill theory" helps create a balanced society, while others believe that hurts the economy.
C. Some people believe that the nation should have been divided into two countries, while others believe that each state should be independent.
D. Some people believe that we need more railroads, while others believe that the Transcontinental Railroad created hardship for the country.
The correct answer is A) Some people support states' rights, while others believe that the federal government should hold more power.
The statement that continues to be an issue today and contributed to the divisions that caused the Civil War was "Some people support states' rights, while others believe that the federal government should hold more power."
Some issues that Americans disputed in the 1800s are still controversial today. Some citizens demand more independence from the deferral government to strengthen the power of the states. Others consider that the nation can only be sustained by a strong federal government that can lead the Union.
This issue was one of the most important causes that originated in the Civil War. The Confederates demanded more independence and supported slavery. Indeed, slaves played a huge part in the economy of the southern plantations. Meanwhile, in the northern states, people wanted to abolish slavery and condemned the separation of the southern states.
What type of material was scarce in the South?
Answer:iron
Explanation:
Answer: The correct answer is : Weapons and ammunition were too scarce in the south.
Explanation: The men had to bring their own weapons. The soldiers had many needs, some as elementary as shoes. In the south, cars, horses, tents and uniforms were also in short supply. Food was scarce throughout the war. Finally the south lost the war because it ran out of money, without men and without supplies.