Read the passage. As Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army before and during World War II, [George C.] Marshall earned a great share of the responsibility for the Allied victory. He helped plan, train and deploy ten million American soldiers and airmen, managing also the scientific development and procurement of the ever-increasingly complex weapons. After a few days of retirement following World War II, Marshall was called upon by the President to help manage the crucial problems of waging peace. As Secretary of State from 1947 to 1949, he was the personal architect of the American diplomatic and economic program which turned the tide of Communism in war-ravaged Western Europe. This program came everywhere to be known as the "Marshall Plan" and led to the coalition of free nations under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), paving the way for a revitalized Europe. For this, Marshall received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1953.

–“Biographical Sketch of George C. Marshall,” Marshall Space Flight Center

According to the passage, what were George C. Marshall’s nonmilitary contributions after World War II? Check all that apply.

He served as president of the United States.
He assisted in developing NATO, which helped Western Europe rebuild after the war.
He redesigned and reconstructed key government buildings in Western Europe that were destroyed in the war
. He created the Marshall Plan, which provided economic support for war-torn regions.
He helped stop the spread of communism in Western Europe.

proletariat is your answer

Answer: I think the answer is b

Explanation:

Answer:

decline in consumer purchasing power.

Explanation:

A major cause of the Depression of 1929 was decline in consumer purchasing power. During the 1920s people were purchasing goods on credit though they did not really possess the long-term ability to pay for the goods they got. The gold standard was not an issue, and public works projects and government assistance programs were not a major concern until the 1930s.

Answer:

achieve equal treatment for all Indians

Explanation:

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was the most prominent leader of the Indian Independence Movement against the British Raj, for which he practiced nonviolent civil disobedience, as well as pacifist, politician, thinker and Indian Hindu lawyer. He received from Rabindranath Tagoreel the honorary name of Mahatma.

From 1919 he belonged openly to the front of the Indian nationalist movement. He established novel methods of social struggle such as the hunger strike and in his programs he rejected the armed struggle and carried out a preaching of the ahimsa (nonviolence) as a means to resist British rule. He defended and promoted widely the total fidelity to the dictates of the conscience, even reaching civil disobedience if necessary; In addition, he fought for the return to the old Hindu traditions. He corresponded with León Tolstoy, who influenced his concept of nonviolent resistance. He was the inspiration for the march of the salt, a demonstration across the country against the taxes to which this product was subject.

George W. Bush was 54 years old when he became the 43rd president of the United States.

George W. Bush became the 43rd president of the United States when he was inaugurated on January 20, 2001. He is the son of former President George H. W. Bush, who was the 41st president. George W. Bush was born on July 6, 1946. This means he was 54 years old when he began his presidency.

His tenure as president lasted until January 20, 2009. The path to the White House involved retaining the conservative backing that had buoyed the electoral successes of his predecessors, as seen in the significant contrast between George H. W. Bush and his political rival, William Jefferson Clinton.

Answer:

The Correct Answer is Vietnam.

Explanation:

Answer:

A parliament

Explanation:

A parliament is a legislative body or assembly that exists in certain countries, such as Great Britain, Australia and Canada, which is the responsible for discussing bills and making laws, and it is usually commanded by a Prime Minister which also set the national agenda and appoint cabinet officials. In some parliamentary systems, the Prime Minister is appointed by the head of state. However, this latter can only appoint a person that has a legislative majority.

The Teller Amendment stated that the United States had no intention of annexing Cuba, aiming to dispel fears of U.S. imperialism during the Spanish-American War, which was later altered by the Platt Amendment.

The statement that claims the United States had no intention of taking over Cuba is articulated in the Teller Amendment. This amendment was a part of the declaration of war which specifically renounced any American intention to annex Cuba and was passed to assure those concerned about potential imperialistic objectives of the United States. While the Teller Amendment barred the U.S. from annexing Cuba, it was later modified by the Platt Amendment. The Platt Amendment imposed limitations on Cuba’s sovereignty, allowing the United States to intervene in Cuban affairs and to maintain a naval base at Guantanamo Bay.

Final answer:

The Teller Amendment clearly stated that the United States had no intention of taking over Cuba, aligning with anti-imperialistic ideals by disclaiming any desire to annex or control Cuba post-war.

Explanation:

The correct answer to the question is b. Teller Amendment. The Teller Amendment was passed by Congress as a part of the declaration of war against Spain in 1898. This amendment stated that the United States had no intention of taking over Cuba, asserting that its goal was to assist the Cuban people in achieving independence from Spain. It disclaimed any American interest in controlling Cuba post-war, a representation of anti-imperialistic sentiment at that time.

Later developments included the Platt Amendment, which modified the Teller Amendment by giving the United States certain controls over Cuba, notably in foreign policy and the establishment of a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay. However, the initial intent of the Teller Amendment was clear in its declaration against U.S. annexation or control over Cuba following the end of the Spanish-American War.

The correct answer is 1862

Answer:

c) 1862

Explanation:

Dr. Richard Gatling's 1862 invention of the Gatling gun, or rapid-fire weapon, was used both in the American Civil War, but also in the Spanish-American War. The Gatling gun, and later invention of the Maxim gun, revolutionized warfare.

The correct answer is- THE OPEN DOOR POLICY

Charles Sumner, a senator from Massachusetts (1851-1874), had significant support from the people of Massachusetts, largely due to his strong anti-slavery stance and resilience following a violent attack in the Senate.

Yes, Charles Sumner did indeed have the support of the people of Massachusetts. He was a renowned senator from Massachusetts who served from 1851 to 1874 and was a leading abolitionist voice in antebellum America. His vociferous stand against slavery won him substantial support in Massachusetts, particularly in the wake of his severe beating in the Senate chamber by Congressman Preston Brooks of South Carolina, following his 'Crime against Kansas' speech. This event and his subsequent resilience only strengthened his popularity among Massachusetts citizens and solidified him as a symbol of the state's anti-slavery stance.

https://brainly.com/question/23689002

#SPJ3

Final answer:

Middle-class women helped to stabilize their families during economic downturns by efficiently managing household affairs and participating in social mobility activities. Working-class women contributed to income through home-based work or, during the Great Depression, by seeking paid employment. In the Soviet Union, women were expected to work in industrial jobs while also maintaining traditional domestic roles.

Explanation:

To help weather unstable industrial depressions, middle-class women were expected to contribute to the family's economic stability in various ways. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, middle-class women did not generally work for wages outside their homes. However, they played a critical role in the household by ensuring that it operated efficiently, and they facilitated social mobility through their domestic activities and consumer choices. These activities included cultivating proper manners in their children, maintaining a clean and orderly home, potentially with the aid of a servant, and participating in the strategic purchase of consumer goods, which signaled their family's cultured and successful status to others. Although they were not wage earners, middle-class women's domestic work was a cornerstone in maintaining their family's middle-class status during economic downturns.

In contrast, working-class women often supplemented their family's income by finding ways to work from within the home, such as taking in laundry, caring for other people's children, doing piecework for local businesses, or taking in boarders if their living space permitted. During the Great Depression, many women went to great lengths to save money by canning food and sewing clothing and, when necessary, seeking paid employment itself, even in the face of resentment and legal barriers due to their gender and marital status.

The situation was markedly different in the Soviet Union, where women were pushed into the workforce as part of Soviet policy. These women faced discrimination and a dual burden of employment and domestic roles, without often achieving positions of power either in the workplace or within the Soviet political hierarchy.

Historically, middle-class women's work closely related to running a household began to contribute to social projects and reform movements in the community. Addressing issues such as disease prevention, alcoholism, and the conditions of the working class became appropriate occupations for these women, who used their skills beyond domestic confines for a broader social good.

The answer is:

pro

con

pro

con

The Missouri Compromise provided a temporary balance between free and slave states but also exposed deeper sectional disagreements over slavery. It included terms like the 36°30' line to limit slavery's expansion, yet failed to resolve the underlying conflict over the institution.

The Missouri Compromise had various aspects that could be seen as both pros and cons, depending on one's perspective. When considering whether it briefly balanced the interests of the North and the South in Congress, it can be seen as a pro, because it maintained a temporary balance of power by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. However, this also revealed the con, as it brought the depth of the disagreement between the North and the South into sharp focus.

The statement that it settled the issue over the growth of slavery can be seen as a pro to an extent because it established the 36°30' line, north of which slavery was to be excluded, providing a clear geographical boundary. Nonetheless, this measure did not address the long-term issue, and as a con, it did not solve the basic disagreement over slavery, laying the groundwork for future conflict, as it was clear that the Constitution protected slavery where it existed, but the expansion of slavery was still contentious.

Answer:A

Explanation:

Hillary Clinton showed her activism in her college years by organizing C. a strike against her own college's lack of diversity, setting the stage for her future role as a change symbol in American politics and social justice.

During her college years, Hillary Clinton showed her activism by organizing a strike against her own college's lack of diversity. As a college student, she was involved in various acts of social and political advocacy. Her pursuits in activism later translated into her public service roles where she continued to address issues of social justice, and discrimination and brought about significant change in these areas. Additionally, Clinton became a symbol for change, depicting the major social and political transformations that the United States has undergone since the 1960s through her policies and campaigns, further demonstrating her continued commitment to activism and progressive causes from her college days into her public career.

Answer:

To Aristotle, tyranny destroy monarchy, because it “has in view the interest of the monarch only.” To him, tyranny is the arbitrary power of an individual, responsible to no one, which governs, with a view to its own advantage, not to that of its subjects, and therefore against their will. Aristotle believed that tyranny is the “very reverse of a constitution.” He explained that where the laws have no authority, there is no constitution. The law ought to be supreme over all. Aristotle stressed that these laws must uphold just principles, such that true forms of government will of necessity have just laws, and different forms of government will have unjust laws.

Aristotle held views similar to Plato’s about the dangers of democracy and oligarchy. He feared that both pitted the rich against the poor. But he recognized that these types of governments took many forms. The worst were those without the rule of law. In democracies without law, demagogues (leaders appealing to emotions) took over. For in democracies where the laws are not supreme, demagogues spring up, his sort of democracy is what tyranny is to other forms of monarchy. The spirit of both is the same, and they alike exercise a despotic rule over the better citizens.  

Answer:

Observation - forecast weather; watching something

Communication - TV signals; spreading or sharing ideas

Navigation - geographical position; to help locate and share information about where something is

Explanation:trust me i got it right