Roosevelt called December 7, 1941, "a day that will live in infamy." Why?

Question 20 options:

The Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor.

The Luftwaffe bombed London.

The Germans invaded Poland.

The Russians experienced the siege of Leningrad.

No, not all urban communities should have one type of local government because different types of municipalities have evolved with varying needs and administrative requirements. The presence of different models such as the mayor-council system and council-manager system reflects the diverse conditions and challenges faced by municipalities. A single governance model is not feasible due to the distinct challenges and economies of scale in densely populated areas.

The question of whether all urban communities, including villages, towns, and cities, should have one type of local government is complex due to the diverse needs and conditions of various municipalities. Each municipality, governed by city, town, or borough governments, receives its authority from the state and has a significant impact on its citizens' daily lives. Given that there are nearly 19,500 municipal governments and approximately 16,500 township governments in the United States, it becomes evident that a single governance model may not fit all. The vast majority of municipal governments operate using either a mayor-council system or a council-manager system, depending on what best suits local needs.

Different types of municipalities, like hamlets, villages, towns, and cities, have evolved due to the population's transition from farming to specialized nonfarming jobs, requiring different levels of administration and public services. Disputes and the need for law enforcement necessitated the creation of localized governments. Furthermore, the concept of one giant city is impractical due to diseconomies of scale, such as traffic congestion, pollution, and crime, which can offset the benefits of economies of scale in densely populated urban areas.

Thus, considering the varied nature and size of communities as well as their unique challenges and advantages, it's not feasible for all urban communities to have one type of local government. The structure and purpose of municipal and county governments are crafted to address specific local issues, which underscores the importance of tailored governance models for different communities.

The debate on whether all urban communities should have one type of local government is complex. Local government structures vary widely to meet the specific needs and challenges of different communities. A one-size-fits-all approach may overlook the unique dynamics and necessities of each urban area, from hamlets to metropolises.

Whether all urban communities, villages, towns, and cities should have one type of local government is a matter of debate. The structure of local government can greatly affect citizens' lives, as municipalities have elected mayors or can be managed by appointed city managers. Municipal and county governments differ in structure and purpose, which is reflected in their varying needs and the services they provide. The idea of a single type of local government overseeing different urban forms ignores the unique challenges and requirements of each area, from hamlets and villages to cities and metropolises.

Considering that the United States consists of one national government, 50 state governments, and approximately 85,000 local governments, there is a high degree of diversity in how these entities are organized. Distinct geographies, economies, and community sizes necessitate different forms of governance. As cities and towns have evolved, the need for specialized administrators and public servants has increased, creating the need for varied local governments tailored to the specific circumstances and needs of each community.

The concept of economies of scale can apply to urban planning as well. While cities offer economic advantages, when they grow too large, negative factors such as traffic congestion, pollution, and crime may offset the benefits. These diseconomies suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to local government may not be feasible or beneficial for all communities.

The Espionage Act of 1917 was upheld as constitutional in the Supreme Court case of Scheck v. United States.

Further Explanations:

Schenck versus the United States was a legal case of the United States Supreme Court of which ruling was delivered on 3rd March 1919. The ruling stated that the “Freedom of Speech” defense included in the Constitution as per the First Amendment can be regulated if the uttered word or printed statements bounds to create a threat in the society. In another term, we can say that the ruling defended that the Espionage act of 1917 was constitutional.  

The Espionage Act was a national law implemented on 15th June 1917 in congress, after the involvement of the United States in the First World War. It was framed to outlaw prying of military operations during the commencement of the war. It was further prolonged by the “Sedation act of 1918” that revised the act prohibiting any Speech contrary to the administration. It also outlawed the usage of abusive words, un-trust worthiness, scandalous and profane, violating to which was condemned to 20 years imprisonment or death sentence.

Learn more

Answer Details

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: The Espionage act

Keywords:

Espionage act, United States, Legislature, World War, the Enemy Act, Defense Secret Act, Prohibition, Sedation act of 1918, language, disloyalty, scurrilous and profane

They moved to the west and worked on ranches and farms.

Hope this helps

Answer:

Stamp Act

Sugar Act

Townshend Acts

Explanation:

Stamp Act, Sugar Act and Townshend Acts are  all of the British taxation policies of the 1760s. Hence, options A, C and D are correct.

The Sugar Act, also known as the Plantation Act or Revenue Act in American colonial history, was passed by the British Crown in 1764. In order to pay for the extended British Empire responsibilities following the French and Indian War, it sought to stop the smuggling of sugar and molasses from the French and Dutch West Indies and raise taxes.

The new Sugar Act, approved on April 5, 1764, and put into effect on September 29 prohibited the importation of any foreign rum and decreased the tax on foreign molasses from 6 to 3 pence per gallon while maintaining a high duty on foreign refined sugar.

Thus, options A, C and D are correct.

For more details about Sugar Act, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1686110

#SPJ2

That's a challenging essay question.  There are arguments to be made from both sides, and the core of the argument is as old as the ideas of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.  

Thomas Hobbes believed that the social contract essentially meant that people will exchange some of their individual freedoms for common security. His treatise,  Leviathan (1651) supported a strong central government for the sake of a country's security and stability.  So if Hobbes were answering your question,m he'd say that the Department of Homeland Security is proper and needed in order to keep citizens safe.

John Locke's arguments in his Second Treatise on Civil Government (1689) were more focused on the rights of all persons and the protection of those rights in a society.  His view of the social contract saw the emphasis as benefiting all persons in their rights to life, liberty and property.  So Locke might look with a skeptical eye at the Department of Homeland Security, if it was shown to be infringing on individuals' rights and liberties.

self-determination could break up the global empires of the colonial powers, including Britain.

ans is B: It wanted to protect its global empire.

Britain oppose the idea of self-determination in the “Fourteen Points” plan because It wanted to protect its global empire. Option B. This is further explained below.

Generally, is simply defined as a large collection of nations or countries dominated by a centralized monarch.

In conclusion, Because it wished to safeguard its worldwide empire, Britain opposed the principle of self-determination in the "Fourteen Points" plan. This is detailed in more detail below.

Read more about empire

https://brainly.com/question/977538

#SPJ2

The correct answer is D. IT WILL HELP CATCH CRIMINALS

Answer:

The Medici family was important to the development of the Renaissance because its members were rich bankers that sponsored several artists.

Explanation:

The Medici family was a Florentine great family from the 13th to the 18th century. The family includes three popes, several rulers of Florence and Tuscany, and later members of the French Royal House. The lineage came from humble conditions, but in the 15th century it became the most influential family in Florence and later officially ruled the city.

The wealthiest and most well-known members of the Medici family for their lifetime careers and possessions earned their wealth especially in the fabric trade and banking. The Medici Bank was one of the most respected and successful in Europe. Medici had banking activities in Italy, Geneva, London and Bruges in Flanders. However, most of the activities took place in Italy.

The Medici family had close links with many of the great Renaissance thinkers and artists such as Filippo Brunelleschi, Donatello, Sandro Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Giorgio Vasari and Galileo Galilei. They had all either lived with them, worked for them, attended daily dinner parties with them, or been supported by the Medici family.

To find out how many more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, we can use the U.S. Energy Information Administration graph in Figure 1 to estimate the difference.

To find out how many more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, we need to subtract the amount of coal produced in 1928 from the amount produced in 1938.

We don't have the exact data for coal production in 1928 and 1938, but we can use the information from the U.S. Energy Information Administration graph shown in Figure 1 to estimate the difference. From the graph, we can see that coal production increased from 1950 to 1980, so it is reasonable to assume that the production in 1938 was higher than in 1928.

Therefore, we can conclude that more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, but we cannot determine the exact difference without more specific data.

The answer is B) move the Indian population on to reservations. (I know this is a bit late but I'm just trying to acquire points.)

Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act in 1935 as a part of the Second New Deal because he believed that senior citizens did not benefit from the First New Deal.

The act was enacted in the context of the New Deal promoted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and gave a definitive character to local measures of assistance to elderly people who had become seriously impoverished as a result of the Great Depression.

The levels of poverty and unemployment had increased greatly in the United States as a result of the Great Depression, and a group that was particularly disadvantaged was elderly citizens, for whom "social insurance" of a very basic level was created. However, the New Deal encouraged these social benefit policies to be covered by a federal law designed to protect the elderly, the unemployed, widows, and orphans.

The new law established a social protection system at the federal level: retirement for people over 65 years old, insurance against unemployment and various aids for the disabled, but the diseases and disability were not covered. The blind and handicapped children received grants financed by the Federal Government. Progressively, the system covered a wider part of the population, particularly thanks to the 1939 and 1950 amendments, but initially it was restricted to the limits initially imposed by Roosevelt.

Actually this "Social Security" was created as a public pension system based on the funded distribution, that is, the contributions of active workers served to finance the costs of recipients of aid in the future, without accumulating notable financial reserves of the contributors. Pensions began to be paid from the beneficiary's retirement age.

Answer: False

Explanation: Because of the conquests of King Cyrus, Persia had control of Athens.

Answer: The Declaration of Independence.

The correct answer is D.

The Washington Disarmament Conference was a military conference organized by US President Harding in 1921. It was called outside the mechanisms of the League of Nations, and nine nations were invited to participate: US, China, Japan, Britain, France, Italy, Belgium, Portugal and Netherlands. Russia and Germany were not invited.

For the first time in history, the purpouse of the meeting was to establish a limitation on weapons' production.

Answer:

A. Iroquois

Explanation:

To the north of the Indus Valley were only mountains, while to the west was a sizable desert. These organic defenses contributed to the civilization's ability to repel invaders.

The first known urban culture on the Indian subcontinent is the Indus civilization, often known as the Indus valley civilization or the Harappan civilization.

Although the southern sites may have persisted later into the second millennium BCE, the civilization's nuclear dates appear to be between 250 to 1700 BCE. The Indus civilization was the largest of the three early civilizations in the world.

First discovered in 1921 at Harappa in the Punjab region, the civilisation was later discovered in 1922 at Mohenjo-Daro, close to the Indus River in the Sindh region.

Both locations are in the current Pakistani provinces of Sindh and Punjab. In 1980, Mohenjo-remains daro's were listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site.

In addition to the two big cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro, the Indus civilization is known to have had more than 100 towns and villages, many of which were quite small.

The two cities' extraordinary size suggests political centralization, either in two huge states or in a single great empire with alternate capitals, a practice with precedents in Indian history. The two cities were each maybe once roughly one mile square in total dimensions.

Learn more about Indus Valley civilization, here

https://brainly.com/question/3373105

#SPJ5

U.S. policies like Lend-Lease, the Destroyers for Bases Agreement, and embargoes on Japan signaled a shift from neutrality.

Several U.S. policies have marked shifts away from a stance of neutrality:

1. Lend-Lease Act (1941):This allowed the U.S. to provide military aid to foreign nations during World War II, primarily the Allied powers, without direct involvement in the conflict.

2. Destroyers for Bases Agreement (1940): This arrangement saw the U.S. exchanging naval destroyers with the United Kingdom in return for land rights on British possessions in the Caribbean and Newfoundland, signaling increasing support for Allied powers before U.S. entry into World War II.

3. Atlantic Charter (1941): A joint declaration by the U.S. and the UK, outlining their goals for the post-war world. While not an official declaration of war, it demonstrated U.S. commitment to Allied principles and opposition to Axis aggression.

4. Embargo on Japan (1940-1941): The U.S. imposed embargoes on exports of oil and other resources to Japan in response to its expansionist actions in Asia, culminating in Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor and the subsequent entry of the U.S. into World War II.

These policies reflect a departure from strict neutrality and a growing involvement in global affairs, particularly in the context of World War II.

Opinions varied considerably on how to end slavery in the 19th century United States. Northern elites and middle class were largely against it, although abolitionists varied in their views between advocating for total abolition to colonization. In contrast, the South defended slavery as essential for economy and property rights.

Opinions on how to end the institution of slavery differed greatly among different groups in the United States during the 19th century. Northern business elites had mixed feelings due to their economic ties to slave labor, but overall, more individuals, especially among the middle class, saw it as an immoral institution and worked to end it. The issue of slavery became more contentious with the western expansion of the U.S., sparking fears of the South dominating the North politically and the deprivation of opportunities for small farmers in the new territories.

Abolitionists were the main activists working to end slavery, arguing against its immorality and conflict with the nation's values. However, opinions differed even within the anti-slavery crowds—while some strived for racial equality, others supported colonization, settling freed slaves in Africa. Furthermore, there was a fear among antislavery advocates about white workers having to compete with slave labor, thereby demeaning white labor.

The southern states, whose economy heavily relied on the institution of slavery, resolved to defend it at any cost. The proponents of slavery argued that prohibiting it would violate American property rights. As the abolitionists continued their campaigns, the southerners began promoting the idea that slavery was not merely a necessary evil, but a positive good for the U.S.

https://brainly.com/question/30675047

#SPJ11