Answer:
Ask Rosalyn to do a show and tell about her wheel chair
Explanation:
It will make roysayn feel involved and not go past her confort zone or make things harder for her like in answer 1 and 3. Insisting other children to spend time with rosalyn might make rosalyn feel "special" in a not so good way.
Class membership in the United States is determined to a much greater degree by individual background and schooling, as opposed to economic achievements. True or False True False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is true. people care more about your background than how well you actually do
1. Anthony and Marie have a heated argument. During their fight, Anthony tells Marie that he hates her and wished that she would get hit by a bus. Later that evening, Anthony receives a call from a friend who tells him that Marie is in the hospital because she was struck by a bus. Anthony immediately blames himself and reasons that if he hadn't made that comment during their fight, Marie would not have been hit. What logical fallacy has Anthony committed?
Answer: it is Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc.
Explanation: Post Hoc Ergo Propter is a latin expression that means "after this, therefore because of this". It a logical fallacy and the reasoning is "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. It is a mistake because correlation appears to indicate causality.
Anthony made a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy by assuming his words caused Marie's accident because the accident occurred after his statement, ignoring other unrelated factors.
Anthony has committed the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. This is a logical fallacy where one assumes that because one event followed another, the first event must have caused the second. In other words, just because Anthony's negative comment about Marie was followed by her accident, it does not mean his words caused the event to occur. This fallacy is often summarized as "after this, therefore because of this," which ignores the possibility that many other unrelated factors could have led to Marie's accident.
It is important to recognize that correlation does not imply causation. This fallacy is a common mistake that arises from our tendency to see patterns where none exist, and from our impulse to attribute cause and effect to events that may merely be coincidental. Anthony's belief is understandable on an emotional level, but it is irrational and does not hold under logical scrutiny.
You are assigned a team project in one of your most important classes. You are concerned about this project because a large portion of your grade is dependent upon this team's performance. There are two hardworking and committed students on your team. However, you have one team member, Zippo, who doesn't care about this course and thinks he has other, more important things to do. Zippo has decided to let the others do the work. There are a few other team members who work hard as long as you are all together, but don't work well on their own.In this situation, your teammate Zippo is illustrating which of the following concepts?A. Storming.B. Social loafing.C. Norms.D. Virtuality.E. The social facilitation effect.
Answer:
E. the social facilitation effect
Explanation:
he is not working on this he is working on other things
The correct option is E. The social facilitation effect.
What is the social facilitation effect?Social facilitation refers to the finding that people sometimes show an increased level of effort as a result of the real, imagined, or implied presence of others. The concept was first identified by Norman Triplett in 1898, when he noticed that cyclists' performance was facilitated (helped) when training as a group.
What is an example of social facilitation?A musician/actor/performer who becomes energized by having an audience and does a better performance. Find that you do better work if you go to a library than if you stay at home to study.
Learn more about the social facilitation effect here https://brainly.com/question/16407087
#SPJ2
A group of people within the domain of a state creates their own organization in an effort to challenge inequities and assert their political rights to resources and recognition within their state. What is this type of formal organization called?
Civil society organization is the correct answer.
Civil society organization (CSO), also known as non-governmental organization, is a group of people within society that unite with the primary purpose of asserting their political rights and seeking recognition within the state by challenging inequities regarding human rights, environment, anti-corruption and labor standards.
What is the difference between these two claims: Claim 1. "You shouldn't lie because lying will always come back to haunt you." Claim 2. "You shouldn't lie because lying always causes someone to suffer." Claim 1. would be a counsel of prudence, but claim 2. would be a moral claim. Claim 1. would be a moral claim, but claim 2. would be a counsel of prudence. Claim 1. would be an example of individual ethical egoism, but claim 2. would an example of universal ethical egoism. Claim 1. would be an example of universal ethical egoism, but claim 2. would an example of individual ethical egoism.
Answer:
Claim 1 is a counsel of prudence. It says that the consequence of lying is to the person lying. And that whatever benefit derived from lying is cancelled out later on when the truth comes out.
Claim 2 On the other hand is moral. Because it warns of the general negative effects of lying.
Explanation:
Final answer:
Claim 1, "You shouldn't lie because lying will always come back to haunt you," would be a counsel of prudence. Claim 2, "You shouldn't lie because lying always causes someone to suffer," would be a moral claim. These claims reflect different justifications for why one should not lie; the first is concerned with self-interest and the potential personal consequences of lying, while the second is concerned with the ethical impact on others.
Explanation:
The distinction between the two claims lies in the rationale behind why lying is deemed wrong. Claim 1 suggests that the reason one should not lie is based on the potential for negative repercussions to oneself, indicating a prudential or self-interest perspective. This is often linked to an egoistical standpoint in ethics, where the focus is on the individual. On the other hand, Claim 2 posits that lying is wrong because it inflicts suffering on others, which is a moralistic perspective centered on the well-being of others and the ethical considerations of one's actions. This aligns with moral claims that are universal and grounded in the idea of respecting others, akin to philosophical discussions by Immanuel Kant about the categorical imperative. Philosophers delve into these issues with precision, often drawing on ethical objectivism or subjectivism to argue their points, and will ruminate over the conditions that make an action morally commendable or condemnable. They use sources of moral knowledge and apply various ethical theories, such as universal metaphysical subjectivism and ethical realism, to establish their arguments about the moral status of actions like lying.
While driving in heavy traffic, Nathan narrowly misses hitting another car. After the event, his heart rate and blood pressure increase. According to Selye, Nathan is MOST likely in which phase of the general adaptation syndrome?
(A) resistance
(B) exhaustion
(C) alarm reaction
(D) primary appraisal
Answer:
c
Explanation:
I could be wrong, but alarm reaction sounds correct
VERY TIME SENSITIVE
What happens during REM sleep? The body is free to move around. The mind is completely blank. Your muscles are paralyzed so you can't act out your dreams. Your mind prepares for dreams to occur in stage 3.
Answer:
The correct answer is option C, Your muscles are paralyzed so you can't act out your dreams.
Explanation:
REM stands for Rapid Eye Movement sleep. This is the phase of the sleep that occurs in mammals and birds. In this type of sleep, rapid eye movement occur with low muscle tone throughout the body and the tendency of the dream increases vibrantly during the sleep. The muscles of the body get paralyzed and the person is unable to do anything in the dream. The pulse and the breathing of the dreaming person increases. REM usually happens to old people but it is not limited to them only.
Gilles finds it difficult to consider two points of view when presented with the “Heinz dilemma.” Instead, he focuses on fear of authority as a reason for behaving morally. Gilles is at which of Kohlberg’s stages of moral development?
Answer: the correct answer is stage 1 punishment and obedience orientation
Explanation:
Kohlberg indicates that there are three levels of Moral development: Level 1: Pre-Conventional morality, Level 2: Conventional Morality, and Level 3: Post-Conventional morality. Each of these levels are divided into two stages, for a total of six stages.
According to Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development, Gilles is at the 'pre-conventional morality' stage. At this stage, moral decisions are influenced by possible punishments from authority, which aligns with Gilles' fear of authority. This stage typically occurs before age 9, and is succeeded by 'conventional' and 'postconventional' stages of moral development.
Explanation:Based on Lawrence Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development, Gilles is at the stage of pre-conventional morality. At this stage, an individual's moral decisions are largely influenced by the consequences that could occur as a result of their actions, such as punishment from authority figures (in this case, Gilles' fear of authority). This reasoning is rather simplistic compared to the more complex moral reasoning in the later stages.
Kohlberg's theory includes three levels: preconventional, conventional, and postconventional. The preconventional level, where Gilles is located, often happens before age 9. The conventional level usually occurs in early adolescence, where moral decisions are made based on societal norms and laws. The postconventional level, which few people achieve, is where individuals consider multiple perspectives and overall ethics when making moral decisions, rather than just personal consequences or societal norms.
Learn more about Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development here:https://brainly.com/question/21193013
#SPJ3
While they were shopping, 6-year-old Elliot came running around one of the store aisles and excitedly asked his mother if she would buy him a $299 Microsoft Xbox 360 game console to use with their television at home. When his mother immediately refused, Elliot looked very dejected but apologized for asking. A few moments later, Elliot asked, "Well, can I get a new basket for my bicycle?" Clever Elliot appears to be using the _____ technique to persuade his mother.
Answer:
While they were shopping, 6-year-old Elliot came running around one of the store aisles and excitedly asked his mother if she would buy him a $299 Microsoft Xbox 360 game console to use with their television at home. When his mother immediately refused, Elliot looked very dejected but apologized for asking. A few moments later, Elliot asked, "Well, can I get a new basket for my bicycle?" Clever Elliot appears to be using the door-in-the-face technique to persuade his mother.
Explanation:
The door-in-the-face technique is commonly studied in social psychology as a compliance method. The persuader tries to covince the respondent to agree by making a large request that the respondent will reject as it were metaphorically slamming the door in the persuader's face.
Yet the men who framed this declaration were great men—high in literary acquirements—high in their sense of honor, and incapable of asserting principles inconsistent with those on which they were acting. They perfectly understood the meaning of the language they used, and how it would be understood by others, and they knew that it would not in any part of the civilized world be supposed to embrace the negro race, which, by common consent, had been excluded from civilized Governments and the family of nations, and doomed to slavery. –Dred Scott v. Sandford, Supreme Court of the United States What is the best summary of Taney’s opinion? The framers who crafted the Constitution were the most honorable men for the job. The men who wrote the Constitution understood that enslaved persons would not be citizens. The men who wrote the Constitution had a great understanding of the language they used. The framers who crafted the Constitution all believed that African Americans should be enslaved.
Answer:
The men who wrote the Constitution understood that enslaved persons would not be citizens.
Explanation:
In this excerpt, Taney argues that the Framers of the Constitution were extremely educated, accomplished and clever men. He also argues that due to this education, the Framers were able to see what the role of African people was, and that they believed they would not be citizens. Taney argues that the Framers were also basing their decision on the status that African people had in other countries. In these other countries, Taney argues that, "by common consent," they were excluded from "civilized governments."
Answer:
B. The men who wrote the Constitution understood that enslaved persons would not be citizens.
Explanation:
According to the law, which of the following is considered an employment test?
Multiple Choice
a. Only personality tests
b. Only interviews and personality tests
c. Small talk before and after the interview
d. Only application forms
e. Any procedure used in the employment selection decision process
Answer:
e. Any procedure used in the employment selection decision process
Explanation:
Any procedure used in the employment selection decision process is considered an employment test. Most employers will ask for an application form and then give you a small interview mixed with a little bit of small talk.
Big companies as well as international companies usually give you a personality test in order to see if your personality fits with what they are looking for. Finally, some companies looking for professionals with certain skills will give you a practice exam based on your skill to see if you can actually get the job done. For example companies like google looking for programmers will test you by giving you a problem and seeing how fast you can program a software to fix that problem and as well as see how many errors you make.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
As you look down the street, you see an apartment building partially overlapping an office building. based on the depth cue of _____, you know that the apartment building is closer to you.
Answer:
interposition
Explanation:
Interposition refers to our ability to analyze the position of a certain objects relative to the position of another objects. (For example, if one object look smaller relative to other object. we most likely would believe that the 'smaller' one is located further away)
When applied in real life, cue of interposition allow us to make a basis prediction regarding distance between the apartment and the office relative to our position like the case above.
Joe is a moderately attractive man. He is dating 3 women. Penelope is a very attractive woman, Susanna is moderately attractive, and Wanda is relatively unattractive. All else being equal, who is he most likely to end up with? Wand A. Men of moderate attractiveness tend to end up with women less attractive than they are. We don’t know. There is no strong connection between the attractiveness of one partner and the attractiveness of the other partner. Susann A. People tend to end up with those who match them in attractiveness. Penelope. Attractive women tend to end up with men less attractive than they are.
The reason why "Susanna" would be the correct answer because Joe would mostly likely end up with Susanna because she meets the level of attraction that he has.
In life, people most of the time would end up dating/going out with someone that matches their attraction.
For example, a very attractive man would often end up with a very attractive woman. This is because the people would want someone else that they want as their partner meet the "visual" standards that they have.
If someone very attractive ends up with someone less attractive, then there could be a chance that the very attractive person starts losing attraction to the less attractive person, but that's not always the case.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!Mohammed had been a science teacher for decades. When he retired, he taught science classes for the general public at the local senior center. This way of adjusting to changes in the lives of the elderly is called __________.
Answer: The way of adjusting to changes in the lives of the elderly is called Continuity theory.
Explanation:
The theory of continuity is one of the theories of the process of human aging. It indicates individuals maintain the same activities, personality, and behaviors throughout their lives, even during old age, adapting it to their current circumstances. In this case, Mohammed despite being retired continues to perform the same action as in his youth; teaching.
I hope this information can help you.
The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. Both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. At trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. For the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. After objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. May the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?
Answer: Yes.
Explanation: Coercion is an illegal practice adopted by some police officers to force individuals accused of a crime to act a certain way or to induce them to give desirable responses. The accomplice's confession will be admitted because the judge's instruction limits consideration of the confession when there's a coercion issue.
Bicameralism is a constitutional principle that means the division of
Answer:
Parliament
Explanation:
The bicameral system is a system in which the Parliament is divided into two chambers. The two chambers are usually organized in a manner of lower and upper dome. The two chambers work separately from each other, but are dependent on each other, as one of them can not pass a law without the permission of the other. This type of system is implemented so that there can never be a situation where one political side can have too much power and to be able to function independently, thus abuse the system. The bicameral system is an excellent system to protect the people and their interests.
Final answer:
The correct answer is option 3. Congress into two chambers. Bicameralism refers to the division of Congress into two chambers, the House of Representatives and the Senate, a system established by the Constitution to ensure checks and balances within the legislative branch.
Explanation:
Bicameralism is a constitutional principle that refers to the division of Congress into two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. This form of legislature, known as a bicameral legislature, is a key aspect of the United States federal government as dictated by the Constitution. The concept embodies the idea of checks and balances within the legislative branch, ensuring that one chamber does not hold unchecked power over the legislative process. The Great Compromise during the Constitutional Convention led to this structure, blending the Virginia Plan's call for population-based representation and the New Jersey Plan's demand for equal representation by state.
As a result of the China-Europe trade imbalance, European nations sought to acquire needed resources in order to participate fully in the world economy of that time. The major advantage they had—advanced weaponry and strong military strategies—resulted in what lasting legacy?
Answer:
colonialism
Explanation:
Colonialism is the policy of exerting control or authority over a territory occupied and administered by a group of individuals with military power, or by representatives of the government of a country to which that territory did not belong, against the will of its many inhabitants. They are sometimes deprived of part of their assets (such as arable land or pasture land) and any political rights they held.
Thirty-year-old Alayna is painfully shy and so sensitive to rejection that she rarely talks to people other than her coworkers and her family members. Occasionally, a man asks her out, but she tend to refuse. She spends a good deal of time reading and writing in her diary about her loneliness and other feelings. According to Erikson's theory, Alayna is facing the psychosocial conflict of _____ and is likely to develop _____.
Answer:
The answer would be Intimacy versus isolation; isolation
Hopes this helps, good luck <3
Alayna faces Erikson's psychosocial conflict of Intimacy vs. Isolation and may develop loneliness and emotional isolation if this conflict is not resolved positively, as her shyness and fear of rejection inhibit her from forming close relationships.
Thirty-year-old Alayna is facing the psychosocial conflict of Intimacy vs. Isolation, which is a phase described by Erik Erikson wherein individuals in their early adulthood, typically in their 20s through early 40s, need to form intimate, loving relationships with other people.
Success in this stage will lead to strong relationships, while failure results in loneliness and isolation. Given Alayna's shyness and her sensitivity to rejection, which makes her avoid relationships unless she is certain of acceptance, it suggests she may develop feelings of loneliness and emotional isolation if this conflict is not resolved positively. Alayna's unwillingness to take risks in social scenarios may stem from unresolved issues in earlier developmental stages.
You have been working for several hours to carefully organize some supplies when you stop to take a break. When you come back you find that a co-worker has been carelessly searching through the supplies and messed up a lot of the work you did. Which of the following would you most likely do?
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Ignoring and start again, reminding yourself to leave a sign or a barrier, next time you take a break.
Explanation:
If I have been working for several hours to carefully organizing some office supplies, when I stop my work to take a break. I just leave the work and go on the break without putting any sign or tag over there. When i came back, i saw that one of my colleague has been carelessly searching through the supplies and has messed up a lot of work I did. I would probably won't say or do anything, because the mistake is mine, I didn't put any sign or barrier or tag at that place to restrict workers from coming into that area. So I would ignore my co worker's careless behavior and make myself sure about putting the sign next time I take a break.
Scenario 1: Aiden comes in from work. Jane had cooked dinner and is waiting for him so they could eat. However, Aiden is tired and just wants to go to bed. Jane is furious and refuses to speak to him. In response, he merely goes to their room and sleeps. Scenario 2: Aiden comes in from work. Jane cooked dinner and is waiting for him so they could eat. However, Aiden is tired and just wants to go to bed. Jane is furious and tells him how she feels whenever he does this to her. Aiden empathizes with Jane?s feelings and offers a compromise; the next time he would be in late for dinner, he promises to call ahead of time. Which scenario is an example of defensive communication?
The reason why "Scenario 1" would be the correct answer is this scenario shows an example of what defensive communication is.
In the first scenario, Aiden is going to be the one that's using defensive communication, in other words, he is on defense. He would be defending himself from Jane.
Jane on the other hand would be considered his "threat," due to the fact that she is furious about the whole situation of him not eating the food that she prepared because he wants to go to bed.
Aiden is using defensive communication by going to the room and sleep, that would be his "defensive tactic" in order to avoid Jane. Although Aiden is not verbally communicating to Jane, he is showing signs that he's avoiding her for his own defense, and that would be considered communication to Jane. Showing signs is also another form of communication, it doesn't have to be verbal.
I hope this helps you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!Scenario one is an example of defensive communication.
When two people communicate information through talk, it is referred to as communication. When a message makes a listener feel threatened and protected as a result, defensive communication has taken place.
In an effort to maintain their self-worth or in response to aggressive behavior, people communicate defensively. The first scenario clearly shows that it lacks comprehension, focus, and consultation.
In scenario one, Aiden arrives after work waiting for Jane to finish cooking dinner so they can eat. but Aiden wants to rest due to being tired which makes Jane enraged and won't even talk to him indicating defensive behavior.
Learn more about defensive communication, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30174175
#SPJ7
In The Federalist Papers, James Madison argued that Select one:A. the large size of the United States was a source of political stability B. to be a republic, a country must be geographically smallC. church and state must be linked in order to encourage republican virtued. D. it was essential that slavery be abolished for liberty to flourish
Answer:
a. the large size of the United States was a source of political stability.
Explanation:
In The Federalist Papers, James Madison, who was a firm opponent to factions, argued that the large size of the United States was a source of political stability because in a large and diverse republican nation, it would be unlikely that a majority of people agreed on the same issues and hence, factions, which had a destructive role in society, would have less power.
James Madison, in The Federalist Papers, argued that the large size of the United States was a source of political stability, reducing the risk of factionalism.
Explanation:In The Federalist Papers, James Madison argued that the large size of the United States was a source of political stability. This belief was a part of his broader theory of a large republic, wherein he posits that the bigger the republic, the less likely it would fall to factionalism. The diversification of interests in a large republic would prevent any single group from gaining an undue influence.
Learn more about James Madison here:https://brainly.com/question/244183
#SPJ6
In the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the ________________ were outside the President's power to create and were, therefore, invalid.
Answer:
In the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the military comissions were outside the President's power to create and were, therefore, invalid.
Explanation:
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States sustained that military commissions stablished by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay lack "the power to proceed" because its structures and procedures violate both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949.
The most obvious problem of children with E/BD is
A) imaginary friendships.
B) aggression aimed at others.
C) lack of close emotional ties.
D) social fear or disinterest.
Answer:
The most obvious problem of children with E/BD is lack of close emotional ties.- C)
the government body responsible for interpreting the consititution is the
Answer: The Supreme Court.
Explanation:
joseph gallo poured two glasses of wine from the same bottle but put a more expensive price tag on one glass than on the other. He let people test both and asked which they wanted; most wanted the more expensive glass, not knowing that both had come from the same bottle. This kind of experiment tells us
Answer:be careful about lowering the price of their product, because consumers may assume that a lower price means lower quality.
Explanation:
Sacha is 27 and her sister Malia is 16. They both enjoy espresso drinks and consume the same size and type of drink, but one of the sisters experiences greater physiological and behavioral effects than the other. Which sister has a greater response to caffeine, and why?
Answer:
A) Malia will have greater physiological and behavioral effects because she has yet not reach her adult weight.
Explanation:
Malia, who is 16 years old, is more likely to experience greater effects from caffeine due to a less developed metabolism and lower body tolerance compared to her sister Sacha, who is 27. Age, metabolism, and body composition play significant roles in caffeine sensitivity and processing.
The sister who is more likely to exhibit greater physiological and behavioral effects from consuming the same size and type of espresso drink is Malia, who is 16 years old. The main reason for this is rooted in human biology, particularly the fact that metabolism and body composition can significantly affect how caffeine is processed in the body. Younger individuals like Malia may not have fully developed these systems to the same extent as their older counterparts, leading to a higher sensitivity to caffeine.
Furthermore, due to Sacha being 27 years old, her body is more likely to have developed tolerance to caffeine if she is a regular consumer, which would reduce its effects. Age-related differences in body mass, metabolic rate, and liver enzyme activity also contribute to how caffeine affects individuals differently. It is important to consider that caffeine restrictions are commonly suggested for younger individuals, suggesting that their bodies are less prepared to handle caffeine's stimulating effects.
When Gina was 10, she swam in the ocean for the first time. She remembers the feeling of kicking her feet, slicing her arms through the water, tasting the tangy salt water, floating, and learning from her father that salt water is more dense than fresh water, which makes floating easier. Which element is a semantic memory?A. The feeling of floating on her backB. That salt water is more dense than fresh waterC. The familiar feel of kicking her feet and slicing her arms through the waterD. How tangy the salt water was
Fill in the blanks with words that best complete the statement below:
(1) In 1677, the British legal system was structured in a way_____.
(2) To provide juries with more ____ about whether or not a contract existed, Parliament passed the ____. It required that in several types of cases, contracts had to be ____ . One category was contracts involving interests in ____ .
Answer:
(1) In 1677, the British legal system was structured in a way that made it susceptible to witnesses lying on the stand.
To provide juries with more reliable evidence about whether or not a contract existed, Parliament passed the Statutes of Frauds. It required that in several types of cases, contracts had to be in writing. One category was contracts involving interests in land.
Explanation:
The Statutes of Frauds was passed by the English Parliament in 1677. It put an end to executory contracts, in which the parties have not executed their obligations. As a result, such contracts are considered not illegal. Finally, the Parliament invalidated the Statute of Frauds because it decided the statute was helping people to cheat.
When an IRB is reviewing a research study and they are considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, they should consider: Has the researcher completed required training? Are there adequate resources to conduct the study? Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects? Are the research procedures greater than minimal risk of harm?
B. Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects?
Brainliest Please :)
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviews and approves research studies involving human participants. Factors to consider when assessing if a potential subject population is vulnerable include researcher training, available resources, power differentials, and the risk of harm in research procedures.
Explanation:An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is responsible for reviewing and approving research studies that involve human participants. When considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, the IRB should consider various factors. These include whether the researcher has completed required training, if there are adequate resources to conduct the study, if there is a power differential between researchers and subjects, and if the research procedures pose a risk of harm greater than minimal.
Learn more about IRB and vulnerable subject populations here:https://brainly.com/question/5001059
#SPJ
A town in a rural state facing financial difficulties passed a variety of "sin taxes," including one aimed at electronic game arcades frequented by local juveniles. The tax is a one cent per game tax imposed on the manufacturers of the games based on the estimated number of plays over a machine's lifetime. There are no electronic game manufacturers in the state.Which of the following constitutional provisions would support the best argument against enforcement of the tax?A The Equal Protection Clause.B Substantive due process.C The Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV.D The Commerce Clause
Answer: the correct answer is D. The Commerce Clause.
Explanation:
The commerce clause states that the "United States Congress" have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states and with the Indian Tribes".