Answer:
Samuel's dad is B. Making the fundamental attribution error.
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error refers to the tendency individuals have to assume that an individual acts a certain way because of his/her personality, rather than the environment or external situations which could be of influence.
Individuals tend to assume someone is internally driven to something, not taking into account any external motives such as having to perform certain task because it was asked of them.
In this example we can see that Samuel had a school assignment; writing about the mayor and why he is good for the town. His father is not taking into account this information, automatically assuming Samuel is disagreeing with him because of his points of view on the essay. He doesn't listen when Samuel tells him he had to write it.
So, it can be concluded that Samuel's dad is making this error about his son, thinking that he really thinks this way about the mayor.
A psychologist who is studying the mathematical abilities of adults finds significant differences between the scores of adults born 50 years ago, when rote learning was stressed, and those born 25 years ago, when more “progressive” approaches to education were popular. This is an example of a(n) _____.
Answer:
The given situation is an example of cohort differences.
Explanation:
A cohort study is a form of study that samples a group of people that performs a cross section at particular intervals through time. Such a group is called cohort and it shares a defining characteristic, generally the one which experiences a common event in a particular period like graduation or birth.
Example: studying the mathematical ability of two groups of adults born 50 years ago and 25 years ago and analyzing the cohort differences in the scores of the test.
Therefore, the given situation is an example of cohort differences
A defendant was charged with battery, defined as at common law. At trial, an expert witness testified for the defense that the defendant, an athlete, was under the influence of a performance-enhancing drug at the time he committed the battery and that he would not have done so had he not been so influenced. The defendant asked for an instruction to the effect that if the jury believed that he was influenced by the drug at the time of the crime and would not have committed it otherwise, it had to acquit him.Which of the following circumstances would most aid the defendant’s argument in favor of such an instrucion?a. Evidence that the defendant is addicted to this drug and has an overwhelming urge to consume it.b. Evidence that the defendant’s coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin.c. Evidence that the victim of the assault taunted the defendant about his use of the drug immediately before the assault.d. Expert testimony that a reasonable person, on consuming this drug, may experience uncontrollable rages.
Based on the fact that a defendant was charged with battery, defined as at common law. At trial, an expert witness testified for the defense that the defendant, an athlete, was under the influence of a performance-enhancing drug, the circumstance that would most aid the defendant’s argument in favor of such an instrucion is (B) Evidence that the defendant's coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin.
What is a Criminal Defense?This refers to the term that is used to describe and define the process of representing an accused in legal matters and in court where a trained professional or lawyer tries to prove their innocence or culpability.
Hence, it can be seen that based on the given criminal charge, there is an argument of unknowing use and this can be aided by the evidence that the defendant's coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin.
Read more about criminal defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/25316179
#SPJ1
Evidence that the defendant was misled to believe the performance-enhancing drug was only aspirin suggests involuntary intoxication, potentially negating criminal intent and supporting a defense against battery charges.
This suggests the defendant's intoxication was involuntary, as he was not aware he was consuming a performance-enhancing substance. In contrast, voluntary intoxication is rarely a defense in battery cases, as it usually does not excuse the behavior stemming from the voluntary act of ingesting a substance. Since involuntary intoxication may negate the necessary criminal intent for battery, evidence of such intoxication could be a significant factor in the defendant's defense. This aligns with the jurisprudence that allows for involuntary intoxication as a defense if the ingestion of the substance was under false pretenses, which could apply if the defendant was deceived about the substance he was taking.
I need help ASAP please
a computer in every home - Bill Gates
a higher purpose through animation - Walt Disney
a motorcar for the multitude - Henry Ford
sell dreams instead of products - Steve Jobs
Hope this helps.
r3t40
As a well-educated and highly esteemed businesswoman, Delores feels she has accomplished a great deal in her life. She decides that she would like to give back to the community, so she makes a sizable endowment to the local conservatory. She is also using her professional influence to draw the public’s attention to the needs of children who have cancer. Abraham Maslow would probably say that Delores has reached the ________ stage of his need hierarchy.
A, esteem
B, cognitive
C, aesthetic
D, self-actualization
A defendant is on trial for the crime of menacing due to allegedly making threatening phone calls to a woman living in his apartment building. The prosecution called a female witness who lived in the defendant’s last apartment building to testify that she also received a number of identical threatening phone calls while the defendant lived in her building. The defense objected to the testimony on the grounds of relevance. The prosecution responded by explaining that it plans to introduce further evidence establishing that the calls received by this witness were made by the defendant.Is the witness’s testimony admissible?No, because calls by an unidentified caller are not relevant to the case.No, because the witness’s statement cannot be admitted prior to the production of evidence establishing that the defendant made the calls to the witness.Yes, on the condition that evidence is introduced later that would permit the jury to reasonably find by a preponderance of the evidence that the caller was the defendant.Yes, on the condition that the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the caller was the defendant.
If a witness who lived in the defendant’s last apartment building to testify that she also received a number of identical threatening phone calls while the defendant lived in her building, would be relevent in the case. On the condition that the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the caller was the defendant.
Dianne feels overwhelmed. She helps her adult daughter regularly with finances and caring for her grandchildren. She is also the primary caregiver of both her aging mother and her father-in-law. She feels like she never has a minute to herself. Dianne can be referred to as being in the _____ generation.
Answer:
Sandwich generation
Explanation:
The sandwich generation are individuals that care for their (often adult) children and their aging parents.
They care for both simultaneously, which puts often an enormous amount of pressure (mental and economical) on them.
The sandwich generation represents 47% of the adult population in the USA. The trend is on the rise due to aging population and financial instability, which makes starting an independent life difficult for many adults.
Recklessness in the case of an audit is present if the auditor knew an adequate audit was not done but still issued an opinion, even though there was no intent to deceive financial statement users. This description is the legal term for:
(A) fraud.
(B) gross negligence.
(C) ordinary negligence.
(D) constructive fraud.
Answer: the correct answer is D. constructive fraud
Explanation:
Constructive fraud is a legal term describing a situation where a person or entity gained an unfair position over another by deceitful or unfair methods.
How does the organization of the Senate allow a small minority of the population to have significant power in the legislative process?
Answer:
Explanation:
One of these beautiful things about the United States legislature is how much force that minority party has to prevent or boring government. It would be the shame to miss this and to move the assembly into another edition of the House of Representatives with the only difference being the members-only have more massive egos. And all filibustering chairman Trump's appointment of Justice Gorsuch, with no strategy, endgame, or knowing, ensures is this is just what would happen. As the conservative who saw himself at the minority in recent years fighting back against President Obama, I realize the allure of engaging in fights yet possibly useless things all too well. We do get grounds to appease, after all. Still, I believe you can rue that time you pushed Mitch McConnell's finger to push the nuclear switch at the shortsighted revenge turn at Merrick garland's failed appointment.
After a painful experience at one dentist’s office, Teresa’s mother takes Teresa to a different dentist, who takes great care to make her visits painless. Teresa is anxious at first, but after a few visits, Teresa gradually becomes less resistant about going to the new dentist. Teresa’s change in behavior can probably best be explained in terms of _____. But, Teresa doesn’t go to see the dentist again until three years later. On her first visit to the painless dentist after that time interval, she is anxious once again, even though she had not been anxious in her previous visits. The return of this response after it had previously disappeared is known as _____.
Sophia is planning her activities for a hot summer day. She would like to go to the local swimming pool and see the latest blockbuster movie, but because she can only get tickets to the movie for the same time that the pool is open she can only choose one activity. This illustrates the basic principle that…
a) people face tradeoffs.
b) rational people think at the margin.
c) people respond to incentives.
d) improvements in efficiency sometimes come at expense of equality.
Answer: A) People face tradeoffs
Explanation: Since Sophia can get tickets for a movie that is at the same time as the pool is open, she faces objective circumstances, which is why she will have to choose one of two options. This means that she will have to compromise between two equally desired activities that are incompatible, since she can not affect the objective circumstances, due to which she has to choose one of two activities.This compromise is tradeoffs.
In other words, tradeoffs can be described as a giving up of one thing or activity in exchange for the other one we want equally as the first.
Corporations invest in other companies for all of the following reasons except toa. house excess cash until needed.b. meet strategic goals.c. generate earnings.d. increase trading of the other companies' stock.
Corporations invest in other companies to house excess cash, meet strategic goals, or generate earnings, but not specifically to d. increase trading of the other companies' stock.
Corporations invest in other companies for several strategic reasons, including to house excess cash until it is needed, to meet strategic goals, or to generate earnings. However, one reason corporations typically do not invest in other companies is to increase trading of the other companies' stock. While this could be a consequence of corporate investment, it is not a primary motivation for such an investment.
Investing in stock allows a corporation to potentially earn a higher return than might be possible with bonds. Additionally, an investment may align with corporate strategies like acquiring new product lines, entering new markets, or forming cooperative strategies for risk sharing and gaining technology access. On the contrary, increasing the trading volume of another company's stock would not be a direct objective of corporate investment, as it does not necessarily align with strategic goals or the pursuit of a higher return on investment.
Professor Shapiro is your life-span development instructor. One day in class, he discusses his belief that many older people withdraw from others because of their past stratification and that, if they were to engage in activities with others, it would make life more gratifying and promote the positivity effect. Professor Shapiro is supporting _____ theory.
Answer:
Professor Shapiro is supporting the Activity Theory
Explanation:
The Activity theory was developed by Robert Havingrust in 1961. It was also known as the Normal Theory of Ageing. It was developed in response to the disengagement theory. It emphasizes on the direct relation between life and Activity in old age.
Further Explanation:
Activity theory state that as people age, they should maintain social interactions and stay active to delay the aging process and to enhance the quality of life. It challenged the disengagement theory developed by Commings and Henry in 1961. The disengagement theory claimed that it was normal for older people to withdraw from society. It is a part of the aging process.
On the other hand, Havinghurst argued that there is a positive relationship between activity and life satisfaction. He called it " Busy Ethic". The level of social activity directly affected his positive views about himself.
This theory provides the key to age well. The key is to be an active member, meet people, go to long walks and behave as if we are still not old, Having an active lifestyle keeps the loneliness and sense of aloofness away. The more one does the better they age.
The critics of this theory consider the financial issues and unwillingness to socialize are a big hindrance for people to engage in various activities and the activity theory doesn't consider these. The critics say that old people cannot just keep repeating the same activity day in and day out.
Learn more:
disengagement theory: https://brainly.com/question/7597403
Keywords:
Older people withdraw, Activities, Older People
The belief of professor Shapiro that older people would live a gratifying life if they were to engage in more social activities is supported by activity theory.
Further explanation:
Activity theory is a theory of aging applicable especially to late adulthood which suggests that people who engage in activities and social interactions age gracefully compared to those who don’t. This theory suggests that there is a strong correlation between activity and quality of life and life satisfaction in late-adulthood.
The activity is a directly opposing theory to ‘disengagement theory’. Disengagement theory is an older theory which suggests that disengagement from activities is inevitable as one reaches old age. Disengagement theory proposes that disengagement is functional to successfully adapt to old age.
Another theory that was added on later was ‘continuity theory’, which proposes that people were active before remain active while those who were sedentary remain sedentary.
Professor Shapiro’s belief that ‘if old age adults engaged in activities with others, then their life would be more gratifying' supports activity theory of aging.
Learn more:
Explain three possible feelings or thoughts that a person who has been subjected to violent crime may have . https://brainly.com/question/1609123 Name and explain two personal values and two skills that can assist you in overcoming barriers regarding risky behavior. https://brainly.com/question/4924229Answer Details:
Grade: College Psychology
Subject: Psychology
Chapter: Life span development
Keywords:
Life span development, development psychology, activity theory, old-age, late adulthood, inactivity, activity, aging , adults, interaction.
Johnny is 12 years old and has been aggressive toward his siblings and his peers, hitting, kicking, and calling them names. Johnny’s parents are worried about these new aggressive behaviors and consult with a psychologist, who suggests that this behavior could be a result of watching too many violent movies and playing too many violent videogames. The psychologist’s explanation for the aggression is consistent with _____.
Behaviorism
Explanation:The reason why "Behaviorism" would be the correct answer is because what the psychologist described as a possible factor for Johnny's behavior is related to Behaviorism.
Behaviorism is when experts can study a person's behavior and can see that the person's behavior is caused by its environment. What this means is that a person's behavior could be based upon their surroundings.
In this case, the reason why Johnny is acting this way is because he watched too many violent movies and played too many violent games. The violent movies and games that he saw and played would be the environment.
The environment, the violent movies and games, caused him to act the way he's acting. His behavior is being based upon the stuff he's watching, and that's the environment that's leading him to being very aggressive towards his siblings and peers. Since he's around an environment of violence, he's behavior starts to act with violence.
If it wasn't for the environment,. the violent movies and games, then he would probably be behaving different, due to the act that he's not around an environment of violence.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!Please Help Me TY!!!!
Match each example with the choice that best fits the description.
Examples
(1) The connotative definition of the word snake
(2) The denotative definition of the word snake
(3) A sentence featuring the literal meaning of the word snake
(4) A sentence featuring a simile with the word snake
choices that best fits the description:
A) Anita told everyone she would like a snake for her birthday.
B) one who is untrustworthy or presents an unseen danger
C) The kite string was wrapped around the branch like a snake.
D) Todd was a snake in the grass, waiting for a chance to strike.
E) a scaly, limbless, elongated, sometimes venomous reptile
1: B
2: E
3: A
4: C
I'm pretty sure these are right, yell at me if i'm wrong lol
Structurally, the Articles of Confederation created
a) three branches of governments
b) only one governing body
c) a federal judiciary
Answer:
Answer choice A
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.
Answer:
Structurally, the Articles of Confederation created Three branches of governments
Explanation:
The confederation article is among the first constitution in America that established the union during the war of revolutionary. The congress of the intercontinental then drafted it and passed the declaration.
The article led to cooperation among different states; the report was in favor of the power of the country because they were not confident about a central and robust government. This was because insufficient federal government with the three bodies of the ruling.
This is the reason why the confederation article served as a document that led to the declaration of power.
Bernie sanders with martin luther king jr
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
What is a difference between obedience and conformity?
Answer:
To conform means to act in accordance with certain expectations or specifications in place. In contrast, to obey means to fulfill a specific command. Thus, the difference between the two is that conformity is to act as expected without any specific instruction to do so, while obey means the opposite. to obey thing that the want you to do like orders and you have to do it in force someone may force you to do something it like taking orders from someone
Explanation:
Conformity requires a request, obedience involves an order. Conformity is going along with persons of equal status; obedience is obeying someone with a higher position. While conformity is driven by the desire to fit in, obedience is driven by social influence.
What do you mean by Conformity?Conformity is the process through which individuals alter their attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, or perceptions to more closely align with those of the organizations they identify with, aspire to join, or for whose approval they are looking.
Conformity is peer pressure; the person submits to it without being asked to do so because they want to fit in and be accepted. On the other hand, those in positions of authority, such teachers and police officers, command obedience.
Therefore, Conformity requires a request, obedience involves an order. Conformity is going along with persons of equal status; obedience is obeying someone with a higher position.
Learn more about Conformity, here;
https://brainly.com/question/15730332
#SPJ2
A defendant is on trial for murder. The only evidence linking the defendant to the crime is some blood found at the scene. The lead detective testifies that an officer took a vial containing a blood sample that had been retrieved by a crime scene technician and drove off with it. The officer is now dead. Next, the prosecution presents as a witness a crime lab chemist. The chemist will testify that he took a vial of blood that contained a label identifying it as having been retrieved from the subject crime scene, and that he performed tests that established a match between that blood and a blood sample taken from the defendant. Is the testimony of the chemist admissible?
While serfdom and indentured servitude were justified mostly by economic principles, slavery and the encomienda system were justified most by A. Racist principles B. Regional practices C. Religious principles D. Agriculture practices
Answer:
While serfdom and indentured servitude were justified mostly by economic principles, slavery and the encomienda system were justified most by Racist principles.- A.
How did boris johnson become prime minister
Answer:
honestly i dont know
Explanation:
Which of the following was the strongest motivation for the European powers, such as England and France, to explore and make territorial claims in the Americas? Catholic rulers feared the potential of a massive Protestant empire to crush their own empire and faith. They witnessed and felt threatened by the growing value of Spain's colonial economy and trade. It was the only way to protect their shipping and trade with the native populations in the New World. Monarchs saw the opportunity to incorporate thousands of American Indians as taxpaying citizens.
Answer:
Option B. One of the strongest motivation for the European powers, such as England and France, to explore and make territorial claims in the Americas was that they witnessed and felt threatened by the growing value of Spain's colonial economy and trade.
Explanation:
The European colonization of the Americas began in 1492 when the Italian explorer Christopher Columbus landed, by mistake, in what was going to be known as "The New World". Although Italian by birth, Columbus was sponsored to do his voyage by the Spanish crown, and after his first trip to the new continent, a series of other Spanish travelers started to colonize different regions of America. This gave Spain a huge growing value based on trade and a new way of economic ruling, and sooner than later other powers of Europe like England and France decided it was their time to conquer some of the New World, so that their own power would not be diminished by the Spanish's conquering wave. In the end, England and France were mainly settled in what is now known as North America, while Spain controlled the rest of the region.
Answer:
option B!
Explanation:
Mark drinks about a fifth of ??? bourbon each day but denies that he’s an alcoholic. When his wife suggests that he should seek treatment, he angrily replies, “I hold down a job just fine. Drinking just doesn’t affect me as much as it does other people. If I had problems at work, then maybe I’d be worried that I have a drinking problem, but I don’t.” What is Mark most likely doing to reduce his level of cognitive dissonance?
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Mark is most likely doing Self Justification to reduce his level of cognitive dissonance.
Explanation:
When a person has some thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, which are inconsistent, especially as relating to behavior decisions and attitude change, it is called as the Cognitive Dissonance.
In this example, Mark is practicing the Self Justification attitude of Cognitive Dissonance, which means he is justifying his wrong act or behavior by giving some inconsistent examples. His this attitude is a self justification attitude.
District
Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been
redistricted
District
A
District
Party 1
Based on this map, what conclusion can someone draw
about who was most likely in charge of the redistricting?
Party 2
District
Party 1
O Party 2
O neither party
the federal government
Answer:
Party 1.
Explanation:
One could make some educated guesses based on the distribution of the districts and the parties that control them.
What is redistricting?If one party controls a significantly larger number of districts than the other, it could be inferred that they had more influence in the redistricting process. Additionally, if the districts appear to be drawn in a way that benefits one party over the other, it could suggest that they had more control over the process.
However, without additional information about the political landscape and the specific redistricting process that took place, it would be premature to definitively attribute responsibility for the redistricting to a particular entity or group.
It is possible that the redistricting was done by a non-partisan commission or that a court ordered the redistricting for reasons unrelated to political power.
Learn more about redistricting here
https://brainly.com/question/23858494
#SPJ7
Josiane has found an online test that claims to measure IQ. It consists of choosing the correct definitions for a series of words. She is concerned that it doesn’t include any tests of other things that are part of IQ such as problem solving or visual-spatial ability. What type of validity is she questioning?
Answer:
Content Validity
Explanation:
Content validity, which can also be referred to as "logical validity" refers to concept found in In psychometrics regarding the extent to which a measure represents all facets of a given construct. In this case, Josiane doesn't feel like the test represents someone's intelligence since it doesn't seem to test more than your vocabulary knowledge and intelligence is much more than vocabulary.
Josiane is questioning the construct validity of the online IQ test, which is the extent to which the test measures intelligence, as it only focuses on verbal competencies and not other aspects such as problem-solving or visual-spatial abilities.
Josiane is questioning the construct validity of the online IQ test she found. Construct validity pertains to whether a test measures the concept it claims to measure, in this case, intelligence. Concerns about IQ tests often revolve around whether they encompass all components of intelligence, including problem-solving, verbal, quantitative, and visual-spatial abilities. Since the test Josiane found only measures verbal competencies through the definitions of words, it may not fully capture other important aspects such as problem-solving or visual-spatial abilities, thus affecting its construct validity.
Furthermore, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) is an example of an intelligence test that attempts to provide a more holistic measure by assessing a range of abilities, recognizing that intelligence comprises a pool of specific abilities. This multifaceted approach to intelligence testing highlights the complexity of delivering a single measure of an individual's intelligence and the importance of construct validity.
Which president never lived in the white house
Answer: President Washington
Explanation: Because the White House was still in the making at his time .
What is the safest mode of transportation?
Which state produces 70 to 80 percent of all olives in the u.S.?
Answer:
California
Explanation:
Health records that aren't available between hospitals and medical offices are considered lacking
A. communication.
B. contact.
C. interoperability.
D. correspondence.
Answer:
C. interoperability.
Explanation:
Interoperability is the ability of two different computer or electronical systems to use the information of the other for its own benefit, for examples two different hospitals that have information about a patient and have the medical records, if that patient goes to other hostipal with interoperabilty thay can see his or her medical records.
When was the glorious revolution and the writing of the english bill of rights
Answer: The glorious revolution takes place in November of 1688, and the writing of the English Bill of Rights in 1689.
Explanation:
The glorious revolution refers to the process of removing the throne of King James II (Catholic), with his daughter Mary II (Protestant) occupying the throne instead. The process of overthrow was very violent due mainly to the confrontation between the followers of both religions and all the kingdoms belonging to Great Britain participated; England, Scotland, and Ireland.
The English Bill of Rights took place in 1689 and is a law that establishes the basic civil rights, limits powers of the monarchy and establishes the parliamentary rights. It was established at the beginning of the reign of Maria II.
I hope this information can help you.
Congress passes legislation that requires all people to have health insurance or pay fines to the government. The president analyzes the legislation and signs it. Several different individuals challenge the law as unconstitutional, and the United States Supreme Court agrees to hear the case. After the hearing, the justices declare that the law is constitutional. This is an example of:
Answer:
The system of checks and balances.Explanation:
The system of check and balances is the system whereby all three branches of the government (the legislative, the executive and the judicial) oversees, check, limit the other so no parts abuse from their powers.
Through this system, each branch can respond to the action of the other, and one example that exemplifies it best is the process of passing laws: When Congress passes a bill, it goes to the President for signature. If the President signs it, it becomes a law, but if they veto the bill, then the bill is sent back to Congress to have a chance of overriding the Presidential veto with enough votes. Lastly, once legislation is enacted and is being enforced, the Supreme Court (who has the authority to hear special cases) has the power of Judicial Review, that is to say, the ability to review the bill and determine whether it is unconstitutional. This is exactly the process outlined in the statement provided.