Answer:
From the table shown the years in which there was a budget deficit are
2002,2003,2005,2006,2008,2010
Step-by-step explanation:
Budget deficit is said to be when expenditure exceed or is greater than the budgeted revenue.
For 2002:
Revenue = $5 trillion and expenditure = $7 trillion
To check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ( $5 trillion - $7 trillion)
= -$2 trillion ( there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2003:
Revenue = $8 trillion and expenditure = $10 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ($8 trillion - $10 trillion)
= -$2 trillion (there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2005:
Revenue = $15 trillion and expenditure = $18 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ($15 trillion - $18 trillion)
= -$3 trillion (there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2006:
Revenue = $8 trillion and expenditure = $10 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ( $8 trillion - $10 trillion)
= -$2 trillion (there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2008:
Revenue = $2 trillion and expenditure = $4 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ( $2 trillion - $4 trillion)
= - $2 trillion ( there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2010:
Revenue = $5 trillion and expenditure = $9 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ( $5 trillion - $9 trillion)
= -$4 trillion (there was a budget deficit of $4 trillion)
From the table shown the years in which there was a budget deficit are
2002,2003,2005,2006,2008,2010
Budget deficit is said to be when expenditure exceed or is greater than the budgeted revenue.
For 2002:
Revenue = $5 trillion and expenditure = $7 trillion
To check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ( $5 trillion - $7 trillion)
= -$2 trillion ( there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2003:
Revenue = $8 trillion and expenditure = $10 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ($8 trillion - $10 trillion)
= -$2 trillion (there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2005:
Revenue = $15 trillion and expenditure = $18 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ($15 trillion - $18 trillion)
= -$3 trillion (there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2006:
Revenue = $8 trillion and expenditure = $10 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ( $8 trillion - $10 trillion)
= -$2 trillion (there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2008:
Revenue = $2 trillion and expenditure = $4 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ( $2 trillion - $4 trillion)
= - $2 trillion ( there was a budget deficit of $2 trillion)
For 2010:
Revenue = $5 trillion and expenditure = $9 trillion
to check for budget deficit = Revenue - expenditure ( $5 trillion - $9 trillion)
= -$4 trillion (there was a budget deficit of $4 trillion)
Learn more about budget deficit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29798595
SPJ12
7 3/4% as a fraction in simplest form
this probably isn't right but this is what the internet says 31/400
To convert 7 3/4% to a fraction in simplest form, add the whole number and the fractional part together, find a common denominator, and simplify if necessary.
Explanation:To convert 7 3/4% to a fraction in simplest form, we first need to convert the mixed number to an improper fraction. The whole number part, 7, can be written as 7/1. Adding the fractional part, we have (7/1) + (3/4). To add fractions, we need a common denominator, which in this case is 4. So, we rewrite the fractions as (28/4) + (3/4). Adding the numerators, we get 31/4. Since we want the fraction in simplest form, we can simplify 31/4 by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by their greatest common factor, which is 1. Therefore, 7 3/4% as a fraction in simplest form is 31/4.
Learn more about Converting percentages to fractions here:
https://brainly.com/question/35291109
#SPJ2
Triangle QST is isosceles, and Line segment R T bisects AngleT. Triangle Q S T is cut by bisector R T. The lengths of sides S T and Q T are congruent. Line segments S R and R Q are congruent. Angles S T R and R T Q are congruent. What is true about AngleQRT? Select two options. Measure of angleQRT = 90° Measure of angleQRT = Measure of angleSRT AngleQRT Is-congruent-to AngleSTQ Measure of angleQRT = 2*Measure of angleRTQ AngleQRT Is-congruent-to AngleRTQ
Answer:
m∠QRT = 90°
m∠QRT = m∠SRT
Step-by-step explanation:
Triangle QST is isosceles with QT ≅ ST. In isoscels triangle QST, angles STR and RTQ are congruent.
RT is angle T bisector, so angles QTR and STR are congruent.
Consider two triangles QTR and STR. In these triangles:
TR ≅ TR (reflexive property); ∠QTR ≅ ∠STR (given);QT ≅ ST (given).By SAS postulate, these two triangles are congruent. Two congruent triangles have congruent corresponding sides, so
QR ≅ SR ∠QRT ≅ ∠SRTAngles QRT and SRT are supplementary (add up to 180°). Since these two angles are congruent, they have the same measure equal to [tex]\frac{1}{2}\cdot 180^{\circ}=90^{\circ}[/tex]
So, true options are
m∠QRT = 90°
m∠QRT = m∠SRT
Answer:
The correct options are;
m[tex]\angle[/tex]QRT [tex]=90^o[/tex]
m[tex]\angle[/tex]QRT [tex]=[/tex] m[tex]\angle[/tex]SRT
Step-by-step explanation:
Given information;
The triangle QST is isosceles with QT ≅ ST.
The angle STR ans RTQ are congruent.
Now, consider two triangles QTR and STR
In the following triangle
1. TR ≅ TR (having reflective property)
2. [tex]\angle[/tex]QTR ≅ [tex]\angle[/tex]STR (as given in question)
3. QT ≅ ST (as given in information)
Now, according to SAS postulate , two congruent triangle have congruent corresponding to their sides ,
Hence ,
1. QR ≅ SR
2. [tex]\angle[/tex]QRT ≅ [tex]\angle[/tex]SRT
Since, this above two angles are congruent they will have same measure
That will be
[tex]=(180/2)\\=90 ^o[/tex]
Hence, The correct options are;
m[tex]\angle[/tex]QRT [tex]=90^o[/tex]
m[tex]\angle[/tex]QRT [tex]=[/tex] m[tex]\angle[/tex]SRT
For more information visit;
https://brainly.com/question/22062407?referrer=searchResults
The glasses that Pierre wants to buy cost $230. If he waits for them to go on sale next week, he can get a 15% discount. How much will he save if he waits?
How much will the glasses cost if he waits?
Answer:
$34.50 saved
Step-by-step explanation:
230 - 15% = $195.5
230 - 195.5 = 34.5 saved
PLEASE HELP!
Given triangle ABC with vertices A(−3, 0), B(0, 6), and C(4, 6). Find the equations of the three medians of triangle ABC
Answer:
y= -7/6x+6
y= -1/2x+8
x = -3
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the slope of the lines of the triangle. Then you can find the perpendicular slope of that (the slope of the altitudes) by inversing it and switching the = or - sign. Then you have a point the altitude goes through (one of the vertices) and the slope. Then you can make the equation.
a. Un equipo de tenis de mesa ganó 21 juegos y perdió 12 juegos, ¿cuál es la razón entre ganados y perdidos?
Answer:
The ratio between won and lost is [tex]\frac{7}{4}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
The question in English is
A table tennis team won 21 games and lost 12 games, what is the ratio between won and lost?
Let
x ------> the number of games won
y -----> the number of games lost
we have
[tex]x=21\ games[/tex]
[tex]y=12\ games[/tex]
we know that
To find the ratio divide the number of games won by the number of games lost
so
[tex]\frac{x}{y}[/tex]
substitute the values
[tex]\frac{21}{12}[/tex]
Simplify
[tex]\frac{7}{4}[/tex]
Is this the right answer?
Answer:
It would be -22, not 22%. She is $22 in debt, which is why it is negative.
2. On a recent field trip, students paid $15 for
each ticket. If $675 is the total cost, how many
tickets were purchased?
a. Write an equation:
b. What is the constant of proportionality?
Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cost of tickets = number of tickets * cost of 1 ticket
The number of tickets purchased was 675/15 = 45.
a. C = 15n .
b. Constant of proportionality is 15.
Answer: $675 + $15 =
Step-by-step explanation:
first add the 5 and 5 together drop the zero carry the one then add 1 and 7 plus 1 which is 9 then add 6 plus zero and ur answer should be 690
P=3L-3W solve for L (literal equation)
P=3L-3W
Move -3W to the other side. Sign changes to +3W
P+3W=3L-3W+3W
P+3W=3L
Divide both sides by 3 to get L by itself
P/3+3W/3=3L/3
Cross out 3 and 3, divide by 3 and then becomes 1*1*W=W
Cross out 3 and 3, divide by 3 and then becomes 1*1*L=L
P/3+W=L
Answer:
L=P/3+W
Is my student correct?
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
There hasn't been a chemical change, rather, just a physical change. All that had happened was a liquid turning into a solid, which doesn't require a change in elements of the liquid itself.
Answer:
YES
Step-by-step explanation:
BECAUSE A CHEMICAL CHANGE STAYS THE SAME AND A PHYSICAL CHANGE CAN GO BACK TO NORMAL
Which is greater, 9 x 10-2 or 3 x 10-4? How many times
greater is the number you chose than the other number?
Explain your reasoning.
Final answer:
[tex]9 \times 10^{-2 }(0.09)[/tex] is greater than [tex]3 \times 10^{-4} (0.0003)[/tex], and is 300 times greater.
Explanation:
To determine which is greater between [tex]9 \times 10^{-2 }[/tex] and [tex]3 \times 10^{-4}[/tex]we need to understand how to interpret numbers in scientific notation. The expression [tex]9 \times 10^{-2 }[/tex] means 9 times 1 following 2 zeroes to the left, resulting in 0.09. In the case of [tex]3\times 10^{-4}.[/tex] it means 3 times 1 following 4 zeroes to the left, producing 0.0003.
Comparing these values, [tex]9 \times 10^{-2 }[/tex] is clearly the larger number because 0.09 is greater than 0.0003. To find out how many times greater it is, we divide the larger number by the smaller one: 0.09 / 0.0003 equals 300. Therefore, [tex]9 \times 10^{-2 }[/tex]is 300 times greater than [tex]3\times 10^{-4}.[/tex]
The distance remaining for a road trip over several hours is shown in the table. Use information to find the constant rate of change in miles per hour.
The U.S. is 3.794 million square miles. Approximately 650,000 square miles are worked for food production. What percent of the U.S. is worked for food production?
Final answer:
Approximately 17.12% of the U.S. is worked for food production.
Explanation:
The U.S. is 3.794 million square miles in total. Approximately 650,000 square miles are worked for food production. To find out the percent of the U.S. that is worked for food production, divide the area worked for food production by the total area of the U.S. and then multiply by 100.
Percentage = (Area worked for food production / Total area of the U.S.) x 100
Percentage = (650,000 / 3,794,000) x 100 = 17.12%
Find the slope of the line passing through the
points
(-9, 2) and (7,2)
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
-y₁ + y₂\-x₁ + x₂ = m
[tex] \frac{ - 2 + 2}{9 + 7} = \frac{0}{16} = 0[/tex]
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
An architect draws a blueprint of a house. He draws the living room on the blueprint as 4.5 in. long by 6 in. wide with a scale of 1 in. for every 4
ft. He draws a second copy of the blueprint with a scale of 1 in. for every 3 ft. How many inches long should the living room be in this second
blueprint?
Answer:
the answer is 8.5
Step-by-step explanation:
yeet
Answer:
I think the closest would be 8 :3
i need help with a math problem right now it says A car rental agency advertised renting a car for $23.95 per day and $0.25 per mile. If Trevor rents this car for 3 days, how many whole miles can he drive on a $100 budget?
Solve -2(t+2)+5t=6t+11
Answer:
t=-5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
t = -5
Step-by-step explanation:
Distribute by multiplication -2(t + 2), obtaining
-2t - 4 + 5t = 6t + 11.
Combine the t terms; this yields -4 = 3t + 11. Solving for 3t, we get
3t = -4 -11, or 3t = -15. Thus t must be -5.
My math problem is 920÷310 can somebody please help me
Answer:
2.967741935
Step-by-step explanation:
What inequality is graphed below?
x < -6
x ≤ -6
x ≥ -6
Answer:
x ≥ -6
Step-by-step explanation:
What is the answer to this question? Simplify:
Answer:
19
Step-by-step explanation:
15-(-36/9)
15 + 4
19
Answer:
11
Step-by-step explanation:
36/-9 can be reduced to -4
15--(-4) is the same as 15+(-4) which is the same as 15-4
15-4=11
A function has a maximum value of 12.375 and x-intercepts of 0.41 and 1.84
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
X=1.125 hope this helps!
Jessica's home town is a mid-sized city experiencing a decline in population. The following graph models the estimated population if the decline continues at the same rate. Select the most appropriate unit for the measure of time that the graph represents. A. hours B. years C. weeks D. days
Answer:
C on Plato
Step-by-step explanation:
Saiges spaceship traveled 588 kilometers in 60 seconds. Determine whether or not each spaceship trip below has the same speed as saiges spaceship
Answer:
Part 1) 441km in 45s --> Has the same speed as Saige's spaceship
Part 2) 215km in 25s --> Does not have the same speed as Saige's spaceship
Part 3) 649km in 110s --> Does not have the same speed as Saige's spaceship
Step-by-step explanation:
The complete question is
Saige's spaceship traveled 588 kilometers in 60 seconds.
Determine whether or not each spaceship trip below has the same speed as Saige's spaceship.
441km in 45s
215km in 25s
649km in 110s
we know that
The speed is equal to divide the total distance traveled by the total time
In this problem we have that
The speed of Saiges spaceship is equal to
[tex]\frac{588}{60}=9.8\ \frac{km}{sec}[/tex]
case 1) we have
441km in 45s
Find out the speed of the spaceship trip
[tex]\frac{441}{45}=9.8\ \frac{km}{sec}[/tex]
Compare the speed of the spaceship trip with the speed of Saiges spaceship
[tex]9.8\ \frac{km}{sec}=9.8\ \frac{km}{sec}[/tex]
therefore
Has the same speed as Saige's spaceship
case 2) we have
215km in 25
s
Find out the speed of the spaceship trip
[tex]\frac{215}{25}=8.6\ \frac{km}{sec}[/tex]
Compare the speed of the spaceship trip with the speed of Saiges spaceship
[tex]8.6\ \frac{km}{sec}\neq 9.8\ \frac{km}{sec}[/tex]
therefore
Does not have the same speed as Saige's spaceship
case 3) we have
649km in 110s
Find out the speed of the spaceship trip
[tex]\frac{649}{110}=5.9\ \frac{km}{sec}[/tex]
Compare the speed of the spaceship trip with the speed of Saiges spaceship
[tex]5.9\ \frac{km}{sec}\neq 9.8\ \frac{km}{sec}[/tex]
therefore
Does not have the same speed as Saige's spaceship
In a lab, a substance was cooled by 36°C over a period of 9 hours at a constant rate. What was the change in temperature each hour?
The substance was cooling down at a constant rate of 4 degrees Celsius per hour throughout the 9-hour period in the lab.
In this lab scenario, we are given that a substance was cooled by 36°C over a period of 9 hours at a constant rate. Let's denote the change in temperature as ΔT (Delta T) and the time interval as Δt (Delta t) in hours.
To find the change in temperature each hour, we can use the formula for the rate of change of temperature:
ΔT/Δt = Rate of change of temperature
Given that the total change in temperature (ΔT) is 36°C and the total time period (Δt) is 9 hours, we can now plug these values into the formula:
ΔT/Δt = 36°C / 9 hours
Simplifying this, we get:
ΔT/Δt = 4°C/hour
So, the change in temperature each hour, represented as ΔT/Δt, is 4°C. This means that the substance was cooling down at a constant rate of 4 degrees Celsius per hour throughout the 9-hour period in the lab.
To know more about Temperature here
https://brainly.com/question/32445661
#SPJ2
two numbers are in the ratio of 2to 3 if the smaller number is 18 what is the larger number
Answer:
27
Step-by-step explanation:
Which of the following numbers is NOT a Solution of the inequality 6x–5>4x–7?
A)1
B)0
C)-1
D)-2
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
The solution to the inequality 6x–5>4x–7 is x > -1. The given numbers that are larger than -1 are 1 and 0, which leaves -1 and -2. From these, -1 is the only given number that is not greater than -1, so it is the number that is not a solution to the inequality.
Explanation:To begin, let's simplify the given inequality, 6x–5>4x–7. Subtract 4x from each side to isolate x terms on one side, obtaining 2x - 5 > -7. Then, add 5 to both sides to isolate the term with x, obtaining the inequity 2x > -2.
Finally, divide by 2 to find x > -1. So any value greater than -1 would be a solution to the inequality.
Reviewing the options:
A) 1 is a solution because it is greater than -1B) 0 is a solution because it is greater than -1C) -1 is not a solution because it is not greater than -1D) -2 is not a solution because it is not greater than -1However, according to the question we need to find the number that is not a solution, so the answer is C) -1.
Learn more about Inequalities here:
https://brainly.com/question/30231017
#SPJ3
−64=6(5n−3)+2(n−7)-64=6(5n-3)+2(n-7)
Answer:
no solution
Step-by-step explanation:
30n-18+2n-14-64=30n-18+2n-14
32n-96=32n-32
-96=-32<-----false statement, therfore it is no solution
What is x minus 1???
Answer:
N/A
p-by-step explanation:
x minus 1 is already a simplified expression (can only be solved if you know x)
Solve the equation 5x + 7y = 35 for y.
Answer:
B. [tex]y= 5 - \frac{5}{7} x[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
okay, so you are trying to get y alone on one side. The first thing you want to do is try to get 7y alone on one side. You do that my subtracting 5x on both sides. You get 7y = 5x +35
Then you divide 7 on both sides and get y = -5/7x + 5
The equation 5x + 7y = 35, when solved for y, is y = (35 - 5x) / 7.
The correct option is B.
To solve the equation 5x + 7y = 35 for y, we need to isolate y on one side of the equation.
Let's begin by subtracting 5x from both sides:
5x + 7y - 5x = 35 - 5x
The 5x terms cancel out on the left side, leaving us with:
7y = 35 - 5x
Now, to isolate y, we divide both sides of the equation by 7:
(7y) / 7 = (35 - 5x) / 7
Simplifying further, we have:
y = (35 - 5x) / 7
Therefore, the equation 5x + 7y = 35, when solved for y, is y = (35 - 5x) / 7.
Learn more about Equation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29657983
#SPJ2
How are absolute values used to describe quantities ?
Answer:
Absolute value is a number's distance from 0, so when comparing quantities, such as positive and negative, the greater absolute value is of that number.
For ex:
|-11| > |6| , because |-11| = 11, |6| = 6, and 11 > 6.
So, |-11| > |6|
Absolute values are used to describe the distance of any values from the point 0. Hence, absolute values are used to express the positive value a quantity.
Quantities may be positive or negative depending on their relative position from Zero.
Positive values are to the right of Zero; While negative values are to the left of Zero.
Since quantities maintain equal distance either to the left or right of Zero; Absolute values are only concerned with the magnitude of a quantity from Zero and not the direction.
Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/18796573
Suppose that the length of a rectangle is 4 times the width. If the area is 900 square feet, then what is the width of the rectangle, in feet?
Answer:
Width 15 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Use formula
[tex]A_{rectangle}=\text{Width}\cdot \text{Length}[/tex]
Let x feet be the width of the rectangle.
If the length of a rectangle is 4 times the width of the rectangle, then the length is 4x feet.
The area of the rectangle is 900 square feet, so
[tex]900=x\cdot 4x\\ \\900=4x^2\\ \\x^2=225\ [\text{Divided by 4}]\\ \\x=\pm 15[/tex]
The width cannot be negative, then x=15 feet and 4x=60 feet.
Final answer:
To find the width of the rectangle when the length is 4 times the width and the area is 900 square feet.
Explanation:
To find the width of the rectangle:
Let the width be w feet.
Since the length is 4 times the width, the length is 4w feet.
Given that the area is 900 square feet, we can set up the equation w * 4w = 900 to solve for w.
4w² = 900
w² = 225
w = 15 feet
Therefore, the width of the rectangle is 15 feet.