Answer:
Explanation:
The vast majority of scientific research has found genetically engineered foods to be generally safe. An Italian scientist’s review of 10 years of research, published in 2013, concluded that the scientific research conducted so far has not detected “any significant hazard directly connected with the use of GM crops.” The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a well-known critic of food companies and artificial and unhealthy ingredients in foods, has not opposed genetically modified foods, on the basis that there’s no evidence they are harmful.
The discussion on whether to enforce tighter regulations on genetically modified foods in the U.S. is complex, involving considerations of potential unknown health risks, environmental impacts, and the public's right to know what is in their food while balancing against possible agricultural benefits and hindrances to genetic food innovation.
The debate over whether the U.S. should have tighter regulations on genetically modified foods (GMOs) is ongoing. Proponents of stricter regulations argue that there are potential unknown health risks associated with consuming GMOs and that there is a lack of long-term safety studies demonstrating their safety for humans. In addition to potential health concerns, the impact of GMOs on the environment, such as the potential harm to other organisms and ecosystems, has yet to be fully understood. Highlights from various concerns include the effects on biodiversity, the rise of super bugs and superweeds, and crossbreeding with non-modified plants, which could have unforeseen consequences.
Conversely, others argue that increased regulation could hinder further development and research in the field, while also causing hardship to farmers. GMOs have been shown to increase crop yields, reduce the need for pesticides, and produce more robust plants capable of thriving in less-than-ideal soil and weather conditions. Additionally, there is no scientific consensus that GMOs are harmful to human health, and many argue that consumers should have the right to know and decide what they eat, advocating for mandatory labeling.
In the United States, a significant portion of the crops planted - such as soybeans, corn, canola, and others - are genetically modified. While some argue for the perceived benefits, including a decrease in food recalls and fungal infections, and despite GMOs being predominant in processed foods, there is still a strong call from the public and various states for more transparency and labeling in the marketplace. This is reflected in the numerous legislative attempts to require labeling of GMO foods, emphasizing the public's right to know what they are consuming.
I need help asap :):):):)
which type of image would best hep readers understand the study being described and its conclusion
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The Dust Bowl was a severe dust storm that ravaged the Southern Plains in the 1930s, causing many residents of this region to lose their
livelihoods and homes, and ultimately migrate to California. Even though the Dust Bowl survivors fled their homes out of desperation in
search of a new place to live, many Californians did not want the survivors immigrating to their state. Some of the Californians believed
they were intruders, competing for land and jobs. Write an essay that argues your viewpoint on this topic. Were the survivors of the Dust
Bowl intruders or refugees? Support your claim with reasons and evidence.
Answer and Explanation:
The Dust Bowl survivors were much closer to being refugees than to being intruders. By definition, an intruder is someone who enters a place without permission with the purpose of committing a crime.
The current definition of refugee, as given by the United Nations, is of a person who needs to leave their country due to violence, war, or persecution. The survivors of the Dust Bowl did not leave their country, but had to move inside it, which makes them internally displaced people, or IDP. IDP is a person who leaves their home seeking safety, be it due to violence or natural disasters, but this person does not cross the border to another country. Still, the premise is the same as of a refugee: the search for security, for basic living conditions.
The survivors may have been seen as intruders back then, but they were doing what anyone in the same circumstance would do. They were fighting to stay alive. They were seeking protection, and safety, just like refugees.
Can someone give me the summary of "In the longhouse, Oneida Museum" ? (by Roberta Hill) (it's a poem). All I need is a 4 sentence summary please and thank you :)
Isolation is the theme
Explanation:
It shows the relationship between the poetry and the place. The poet describes the emotions and the feelings that the house of five fires produce.The poet has internalized the loss and alienation that have come from her experience of removal. This historic consciousness is echoed by her personal loss in the death of her parents and the loss of loved ones. It is a sense of loss that creates tremendous longing, a longing edged with anger, that's reflected in poems like "Underground Water" and "Scraps Worthy of Wind."The the summary of "In the longhouse, Oneida Museum is about the theme of isolation.
What is a theme?It should be noted that a theme simply means the main idea that is conveyed in a literary work. It's the underlying message in an article.
In this case, the theme shows the relationship between the poetry and the place and the poet describes the emotions and the feelings that the house of five fires produces.
Learn more about themes on:
https://brainly.com/question/11600913
In the diary of Anne Frank who brags about her old boyfriend
Answer:
Peter Van pels
Explanation:
Peter van Pels was 15 years old when he had to go into hiding with his parents. They arrived at the hiding place one week after the Frank family. Peter was the only boy in the Secret Annex
Answer:
Mrs. Van DaanExplanation:Mrs. Van Daan was jealous of Anne's relationship with her son Peter Van Pels. So, she brags about the old boyfriends.A "frozen zoo" stores the cells of different plants and animals. But it wasn't always clear if or why the cells might ever be used. What do you think?
Some things should be saved for reasons that aren't yet known.
Agree
Disagree
Explain why you voted the way you did.
Answer: I disagree. Things that are extinct because of humans should be revived. They deserve a second chance in life.
Explanation:
I agree that some things should be saved regardless of how they are eventually used. Many things in life (just like the Frozen Zoo) are amoral. It is the way they are used that triggers positive or negative consequences.
Why is the Frozen Zoo Amoral?The short excerpt states that the "Frozen Zoo" stores cells of different plants and animals. This action by itself is proper and might have been initiated to preserve endangered species for possible regeneration.
When a thing is amoral, it means that it is neither good nor bad.
Learn more about the Frozen Zoo at:
https://brainly.com/question/15768916
Which Shogun tried to decrease the influence of religious leaders
Answer: Tokugawa Ieyasu's dynasty of shoguns presided over 250 years of peace and prosperity in Japan, including the rise of a new merchant class and increasing urbanization.
Explanation: none
Read the passage from "By the Waters of Babylon.”
I went north—I did not try to hide myself. When a god or a demon saw me, then I would die, but meanwhile I was no longer afraid. My hunger for knowledge burned in me—there was so much that I could not understand.
What does the narrator’s response to the setting reveal about his character?
A. His desire to follow society’s rules is greater than his own ideas.
B. His desire to explore is greater than his fear of where he is going.
C. He is concerned that the forces of nature are more powerful than his will.
D. He is afraid that his fear will eventually prevent him from learning.
Answer:
B) His desire to explore is greater than his fear of where he is going.
Explanation:
I need help asap :):):)
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Which of the following is the main use of a semicolon?
to join Independent clauses that appear to be connected by a conjunctive adverb
to separate clauses, phrases, or series that might be confusing If commas alone were used
to separate items in a series of phrases that would ordinarily be separated be commas except that they already contain commas
to join Independent clauses closely related in thought
Answer:
A. to join independent clauses that appear to be connected by a conjunctive adverb
Explanation:
A semicolon is the symbol ";" and it is used in a variety of situations:
- to separate a series/list that already includes commas
e.g. I travelled to Miami, Florida; Austin, Texas; and Los Angeles, California.
- to join independent clauses that are closely related in thought:
e.g. When I arrived, I thought I would have time to buy a snack; I didn't.
- and many more
However, the main usage of a semicolon is joining independent clauses that "appear to be connected by a conjunctive adverb":
e.g. She didn't study; thus, she failed the test.
The answer is A.
In lines 9-27,the author develops her ideas with information from the fields of neuroscience and psychology.How does she connect the information back to the idea that friendships are essential to our sense of who we are?
Answer:
The author by providing an informative about the stream of conscious and unconscious construction states that friends are an important sense of validation.
Explanation:
'With friends like these..' is an informative literary text where the author describes how friends are an essential part when it comes to enjoyment of life. In lines 9 to 27 ie from the third paragraph the author explains the construction of our brain in a conscious and unconscious way. The author says we as a human being often guess about the situations when we cannot see the reality directly. And when our ideas takes the shape of reality, that's when we feel that our ideas are validate, we feel secure and happy, but when those same ideas are proved wrong, we feel unsettled and distressed.
The author then connects this information with the idea that friendships are essential to our sense of who we are. They are an important sense of validation. When a friend validates our idea that something is as we see it, when we feel reassured, relaxed, and safer.
The author connects the information from neuroscience and psychology to the importance of friendships in shaping our identity and well-being.
The author connects the information from the fields of neuroscience and psychology to the idea that friendships are essential to our sense of who we are by highlighting the role of social connection in shaping our identity.
The author argues that through social interactions and relationships, we develop social virtues, such as generosity and Friendships, which contribute to our sense of self.
Additionally, the author emphasizes that friendships and social support provide comfort and help in managing life stressors, thus influencing our well-being and identity.
By drawing on neuroscience and psychology, the author demonstrates the significance of friendships in shaping our sense of self and overall flourishing.
Learn more about Friendships here:
https://brainly.com/question/33715586
#SPJ3
Which sentence is punctuated correctly? Your smile lit up the room when you stepped through the door, Eva. Mario who was that kid, that you brought over to play basketball on Sunday? Speaking of talented hitters, Martin you should try out for our baseball team. If you want to help us build a tree fort, you can come over tomorrow morning Jeff.
Answer:
Your smile lit up the room when you stepped through the door, Eva
Explanation:
which of the following communication styles do women NOT use as much as men?
Use we statements
Saying I agree
ask questions
provide an abundance of information
talk over others
Answer:
talk over others
Explanation:
women are wired to be the more empathetic and talkative partner. they are more sensitive and aware of the emotions of the people around them. all the other statements are positive actions that help create bonds between two people while talking over others is considered "inconsiderate"
Dermatology is the study and medical treatment of the skin. The root logy means the study of something. What does the root derm mean?
Answer:
The root word "derm" means skin.
What is a sentence with empathy
Answer:
are coach felt no empathy for our team when we lost the game
Explanation:
The policewoman showed empathy with others.
Use the drop-down menus to answer the questions.
Who believed that organisms inherited acquired characteristics?
Who grouped humans with primates in the same genus?
Who thought that, if left unchecked, a population would outgrow its food source? |
Answer:
Who believed that organisms inherited acquired characteristics?
Lamarckism (or Lamarckian inheritance) is the hypothesis that an organism can pass on characteristics that it has acquired through use or disuse during its lifetime to its offspring. It is also known as the inheritance of acquired characteristics or soft inheritance.
Who grouped humans with primates in the same genus? I'm sorry, but I don't know this one...
Who thought that, if left unchecked, a population would outgrow its food source? Thomas Robert Malthus
Known for his work on population growth, Thomas Robert Malthus argued that if left unchecked, a population will outgrow its resources, leading to a host of problems
1. Lamarck
2. Linnaeus
3. Malthus
Read the passage and choose the best answer to the question.
Division 1 college athletes should be paid a small salary. Many college athletes have no money for daily life. Their scholarships cover housing, meals, and tuition, but they need money for other things. What if they need shampoo or a new pair of jeans? They often don’t have time to work because of their practices and games. Also, they may not be allowed to work part-time because of their scholarships. College sports bring in lots of money for the schools, so the players should get some of that.
Which piece of evidence best challenges the argument?
The 2 percent of high school grads playing Division 1 sports already get a free education.
Paying college athletes makes them professionals, not amateurs.
Colleges and universities could bid on players, giving wealthy schools an advantage.
College students could be irresponsible with any money they’re paid.
Answer:
It’s A: the 2% of high school grads playing division one sports already get free education
Explanation:
Just did it on e2020
Answer:
ready
Explanation:
What is the purpose of this sentence within the context of the entire essay? A) This is Twain's evidence for all of the main ideas in his essay. B) This is Twain's introduction and explains the Rubicon to the readers. C) This is Twain's thesis and serves to introduce all claims that follow. D) This is Twain's first example and is used to support all other examples.
Answer:
C) This is Twain's thesis and serves to introduce all claims that follow.
Explanation:
According to a different source, the sentence this question refers to is:
"Perhaps the most celebrated turning-point recorded in history was the crossing of the Rubicon."
This sentence comes from the essay "The Turning Point in My Life." This is an essay by Mark Twain in which he discusses the importance of "turning points." These are moments in a person's life in which everything changes. In this essay, his main purpose is that of comparing his own turning points to the crossing of the Rubicon by Caesar, and thus develop the main idea of the essay.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
This is Twain's thesis and serves to introduce all claims that follow. Twain's entire essay is an argument using claims and evidence to support this thesis.
summary of the article Michael Jordan: A profile of failure about the texts ideas or information
Answer:
hey, i did this assignment today, hopefully this isn't too late!
Michael Jordan is known by millions. A legend for turning failure into success time and time again. When Jordan was a sophomore in high school, he tried out for the varsity basketball team. When the results were posted, Jordan's name wasn't on it. 15-year-old Jordan was devastated, and in his mind, it was the ultimate failure. But Jordan picked himself up and did what champions do. He used his failure and disappoint to drive him to try harder, and grow to be better. Michael Jordan faced many more challenges in his life, but because of his attitude, he's become one of the best basketball players in the world and known for succeeding time and time again after failure and defeat.
Explanation:
thanks :)
Read the passage.
Little Adriana had lost her doll somewhere upstairs. Turning on the lights, the babysitter looked under the bed and behind the toybox but could not find the doll.
Which phrases function as adverbs in this passage?
Select all that apply.
a. behind the toybox
b. somewhere upstairs
c. under the bed
d. turning on the lights
Answer:
a, b, and c
Explanation:
i'm pretty sure
Phrases like under the bed, behind the toybox, and somewhere upstairs function as an adverb in the passage.
What are adverbs?Adverbs are the expressions and words that alter the adjective, verb, clause, determinants preposition, clause, etc., in a sentence. They are used in a sentence to express time, manner, place, frequency, certainty, etc.
Under, somewhere, and behind shows the degree of place as they are the adverbs that depict that the misplaced toy box might be under, behind, or somewhere on the upper floor.
Therefore, options a,b, and c shows adverb.
Learn more about adverbs here:
https://brainly.com/question/1397001
#SPJ2
1. Why did the Dutch minister of education tell citizens to preserve the diaries and letters they had written during the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands?
Answer:
So that the Dutch people would always remember the Nazi occupation and learn from their history.
Explanation:
Nazi Germany invaded a neutral Netherlands in World War II on 10 May 1940, and initially ruled them with a velvet glove but later changed their stance and started persecuting Dutch Jews, hunting and killing them.
The Germans increased the tax they demanded from Netherlands as the war intensified which made standard of living in Netherlands drop drastically. There were pockets of local resistance to the Nazi occupation which later increased.
After the war when Germany was defeated, the Dutch launched operation Black Tulip and deported every person with a German passport and tried people suspected of helping the Nazis.
This is the history the Dutch minister of education is keen for the Dutch people not to forget.
Which logical fallacy, " any person who eats tuna fish is just as resposible for the tuna shortage as the big commercial fishers who use fishing trawlers and deplete the supply of tuna in the ocean"
Answer:
C) genetic fallacy
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A) fallacy of the single cause
B) reversing causal direction
C) genetic fallacy
D) slippery slope
This is an example of a genetic fallacy. A genetic fallacy is a fallacy or irrelevance. It is defined as a fallacy that is solely based on the origin of something rather than on the individual context of the situation. This typically transfers a good or bad reputation to the current context based on its origin. In this example, the speaker knows that the depletion of tuna is a consequence of overfishing. Therefore, it is true that the origin of the problem is the consumption of tuna. However, it is a fallacy to argue that any type of consumption is equally bad.
The correct option is 1. i.e. False Dilemma. The logical fallacy in the given statement is a false dilemma, as it presents only two options for accountability in the tuna shortage, ignoring other factors.
The logical fallacy demonstrated by the statement 'Any person who eats tuna fish is just as responsible for the tuna shortage as the big commercial fishers who use fishing trawlers and deplete the supply of tuna in the ocean' is the false dilemma fallacy.
False dilemma, also known as either/or thinking, occurs when a situation is presented as having only two options when, in reality, there are more possibilities. In this case, it falsely suggests that the only responsible parties for the tuna shortage are either consumers who eat tuna or the commercial fishers, ignoring other potential factors and contributors.
Here is why other options are incorrect:
Slippery Slope: This fallacy suggests that one action will lead to a series of unfortunate events. It does not apply here as it's not a chain of events being argued.Straw Man: This involves misrepresenting an opponent’s argument to make it easier to attack. The given argument does not misrepresent another viewpoint.Appeal to Ignorance: This fallacy asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa). This is not the case in the given statement.Thus, the fallacy in the provided sentence is a false dilemma, as it incorrectly reduces a complex issue to two simplistic alternatives.
Complete Question
Which logical fallacy do these sentences demonstrate: Any person who eats tuna fish is just as responsible for the tuna shortage as the big commercial fishers who use fishing trawlers and deplete the supply of tuna in the ocean?
1) False Dilemma
2) Slippery Slope
3) Straw Man
4) Appeal to Ignorance
What is a generalization
Answer:
a general statement or concept obtained by inference from specific cases.
Explanation:
Answer:
A general statement that contains information gathered all throughout the passage(s).
That's my definition, I hope it helps!
Is it that people are corrupt, or is it power that corrupts them?
Answer:
Both power came first tho
Explanation:
A little stress is good (a lot bad)
which of the discourse cohesion techniques is the word between brackets.
a. substitution
b. ellipsis
c. enumeration
d.reference
Answer:
Your answer is D! Hope this helped! :)
Explanation:
As people get older… they feel emotions more strongly. they wish they could still cry and yell like babies. they don't feel as many emotions as they did when they were babies. they use feedback they've received to decide how to communicate feelings.
Answer:
Incorrect.
Explanation:
The feeling of emotion is the same for both the young and old just as is the same for all in various social groups for same age. The only argument lies with personality difference whic
Answer:
They use feedback they've received to decide how to communicate feelings
The question below refers to the selection "Geraldo No Last Name." What does Marin do after the accident?
A. she returns to the dance.
B. she goes to jail.
C. she accompanies Geraldo to the hospital
D. she runs away until the police find her.
Answer:C
Explanation:
Do you agree with the statement below and why.
"Real food is a pleasure to eat. You want to take your time and enjoy every bite. There’s no point in taking your time with fast food. After a few bites, you forget what you’re eating. It’s not exactly food, but a kind of food substitute. So you eat more and eat more quickly, bite after bite, until you feel not satisfied, exactly, but simply, regrettably, full.”
Priming exists a phenomenon whereby orientation to one stimulus affects the response to a subsequent stimulus, without conscious direction or intention.
What is priming?I agree with the given statement.
Priming exists as a phenomenon whereby orientation to one stimulus affects the response to a subsequent stimulus, without conscious direction or intention. The priming effect guides the positive or negative effect of a rapidly introduced stimulus on the processing of a second stimulus that occurs shortly after.
Priming directs to a technique in which being exposed to one stimulus will influence the individual's reaction to a future stimulus, without much intention or conscious thought.
In this case, the individual exists exposed to a particular substance and this will influence how he/she responds to being revealed to this same substance in the future. Since this response doesn't hold to be a conscious one, the individual exists most likely to eat more than one of the substances.
To learn more about priming refers to:
https://brainly.com/question/978930
#SPJ2
EUGENE . . . I'm going to be a writer like Ring Lardner or somebody -- that's if things don't work out first with the Yankees, or the Cubs, or the Red Sox, or maybe possibly the Tigers . . . If I get down to the St. Louis Browns, then I'll definitely be a writer. —Brighton Beach Memoirs, Neil Simon Which historical fact helps you understand the humor in this passage?
Answer:
The Answer is B.
Explanation:
It is Correct!
Answer:
its b
Explanation:
“Is true friends are hard to find” a topic or a theme
Answer:Theme
Explanation:You learn it
Answer:
Theme
hope it helps