Solve Using Dirac Deltla/discontinuous forcing

Consider the following scenario. A salt tank that initially contains 50 gallons of pure water. A brine solution containing 1/5 lb/gal of salt flows in to the tank at a rate of 5 gal/min. Brine flows out of the tank at the same rate. At time t = 15 minutes the mechanism regulating salt flow in to the tank breaks and 20 pounds of salt is dumped instantaneously in to the tank. Although water continues to flow in to the tank at the original 5 gal/min, there is no salt in the water.

1. Write an IVP describing the amount of salt in the tank at time t.

2. Solve the IVP from Problem 1.

3. Plot the solution found in Problem 2 and explain the results.

Answer:

Given,

The value of the house = $ 185,000,

Percentage of down payment = 15%,

(i) So, the borrowed amount = 185,000 - 15% of 185,000

[tex]=185000-\frac{15\times 185000}{100}[/tex]

[tex]=185000-\frac{2775000}{100}[/tex]

[tex]=185000-27750[/tex]

[tex]=\$157250[/tex]

(ii) Since, the monthly payment formula of a loan is,

[tex]P=\frac{PV\times r}{1-(1+r)^{-n}}[/tex]

Where,

PV = present value of the loan ( or borrowed amount )

r = rate per month,

n = number of months,

Here, PV = $ 157250,

APR = 3.5% = 0.035 ⇒ r = [tex]\frac{0.035}{12}[/tex] ( 1 year = 12 months )

Time = 30 years, ⇒ n = 360 months,

Hence, the monthly payment would be,

[tex]P=\frac{157250\times \frac{0.035}{12}}{1-(1+\frac{0.035}{12})^{-360}}[/tex]

[tex]=706.122771579[/tex]    ( by graphing calculator ),

[tex]\approx \$ 706.12[/tex]

(iii) Interest = Total amount paid - borrowed amount

= 706.122771579 × 360 - 157250

= 96954.1977684

≈ $ 96954. 20

The friend will borrow $157,250 for the mortgage, with a monthly payment of $704.30. They will pay $101,548 in interest over 30 years.

To calculate the amount of money borrowed for the mortgage, we need to subtract the down payment from the total cost of the house. The down payment is 15% of the house cost, which is $185,000 x 0.15 = $27,750. So, the borrowed amount is $185,000 - $27,750 = $157,250.

To calculate the monthly payment, we can use the formula for a fixed-rate mortgage: M = P [ i(1 + i)^n ] / [ (1 + i)^n - 1 ]. Here, P is the borrowed amount ($157,250), i is the monthly interest rate (3.5% / 12 = 0.002916), and n is the total number of monthly payments (30 x 12 = 360). Plugging in these values, we get M = $157,250 [ 0.002916(1 + 0.002916)^360 ] / [ (1 + 0.002916)^360 - 1 ]. Using a calculator, the monthly payment comes out to be approximately $704.30.

To calculate the total interest paid over 30 years, we can multiply the monthly payment by the total number of payments and subtract the borrowed amount. The total interest paid = ($704.30 x 360) - $157,250. Using a calculator, the total interest paid comes out to be approximately $101,548. So, your friend will pay approximately $157,250 for the mortgage, with a monthly payment of approximately $704.30, and will pay approximately $101,548 in interest over 30 years.

https://brainly.com/question/31112455

#SPJ3

Answer:

10.96 hours will take for 85% of the lead to decay.

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose A represents the amount of Pb-209 at time t,

According to the question,

[tex]\frac{dA}{dt}\propto A[/tex]

[tex]\implies \frac{dA}{dt}=kA[/tex]

[tex]\int \frac{dA}{A}=\int kdt[/tex]

[tex]ln|A|=kt+C_1[/tex]

[tex]A=e^{kt+C_1}[/tex]

[tex]A=e^{C_1} e^{kt}[/tex]

[tex]\implies A=C e^{kt}[/tex]

Let [tex]A_0[/tex] be the initial amount,

[tex]A_0=C e^{0} = C[/tex]

[tex]\implies A=A_0 e^{kt}[/tex]

Since, the half-life of 3.3 hours.

[tex]\implies \frac{A_0}{2}=A_0 e^{3.3k}\implies e^{3.3k}=0.5\implies k=-0.21004[/tex]

[tex]\implies A=A_0 e^{-0.21004t}[/tex]

Here, [tex]A_0=1\text{ gram}[/tex]

[tex]A=(100-85)\% \text{ of }A_0=15\%\text{ of }A_0=0.15A_0[/tex]

By substituting the values,

[tex]0.15A_0=A_0 e^{-0.21004t}[/tex]

[tex]0.15=e^{-0.21004t}[/tex]

[tex]\implies t\approx 10.96\text{ hour}[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the question we are given the percentages of each of the types of candies in the bag except for brown. Since the sum of all the percentages equals 75% and brown is the remaining percent then we can calculate that brown is (100-75 = 25%) 25% of the bag. Now we can show the probabilities of getting a certain type of candy by placing the percentages over the total percentage (100%).

Assuming the ratios/percentages of the candies stay the same having an infinite amount of candy will not affect the probabilities. That being said in order to calculate consecutive probability of getting 3 of a certain type in a row we have to multiply the probabilities together. This is calculated by multiplying the numerators with numerators and denominators with denominators.

[tex]\frac{15*85*15}{100*100*100} = \frac{19,125}{1,000,000} = \frac{1.9125}{100}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{80*80*80}{100*100*100} = \frac{512,000}{1,000,000} = \frac{51.2}{100}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{20*100*100}{100*100*100} = \frac{200,000}{1,000,000} = \frac{20}{100}[/tex]

Answer:

We will accept the null hypothesis

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :[tex]H_0: \mu= 20[/tex]

          [tex]H_a: \mu> 20[/tex]

To Find :  What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations?

Solution :

z = 3.3, α = 0.05

So, first we will find the p value corresponding to z value in the z table

So, p-value is 0.999

Since p value is greater than Alpha

0.999>0.05

So, we will accept the null hypothesis

So, the population mean is 20

Answer: u (sub d) is inequal to zero

Step-by-step explanation: Because this is a paired t-test, our alternative hypothesis would be u(sub d) is inequal to zero.

Final answer:

The alternative hypothesis for a study on the effectiveness of a diet program would express the expectation of a statistically significant change in fitness level scores, likely a decrease if lower scores indicate better fitness, after participating in the program compared to before.

Explanation:

The correct alternative hypothesis for a study that aims to measure the effectiveness of a diet program in managing weight would look at whether there is a statistically significant difference in the fitness level scores of the participants before and after following the program. As the question suggests evaluating the effectiveness of a diet program, we are particularly interested in seeing an improvement, which would mean expecting a lower score after the program if the score represents a measure where lower is better.

Thus, the alternative hypothesis (H1) should reflect the expectation of improvement. If the fitness score is such that a lower score indicates better fitness, the alternative hypothesis would be:

H1: The mean fitness level score after the program is lower than the mean fitness level score before the program.

This implies that the diet program is effective in improving fitness levels. On the contrary, if a higher fitness score indicates better fitness, the alternative hypothesis would be framed to reflect an expected increase in the score after the program.

Answer:

  m∠1=1/2(mAB+mEF)

Step-by-step explanation:

The measure of the angle is half the sum of the intercepted arcs.

Answer:

[tex]m\angle 1 = \frac{1}{2}(m\angle AB+m\angle EF)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

When two chords intersect each other inside a circle, the measure of the angle formed is one half the sum of the measure of the intercepted arcs.

Here, the chords FA and BE intersected each other inside the circle,

Also, angle 1 is the angle formed by the intersection,

Thus, from the above statement,

[tex]m\angle 1 = \frac{1}{2}(m\angle AB+m\angle EF)[/tex]

Second option is correct.

Answer: 0.5467

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X be the random variable that represents the income (in dollars) of a randomly selected person.

Given : [tex]\mu=15451[/tex]

[tex]\sigma^2=298116\\\\\Rightarrow\ \sigma=\sqrt{298116}=546[/tex]

Sample size : n=350

z-score : [tex]\dfrac{x-\mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

To find the probability that the sample mean would differ from the true mean by less than 22 dollars, the interval will be

[tex]\mu-22,\ \mu+22\\\\=15,451 -22,\ 15,451 +22\\\\=15429,\ 15473[/tex]

For x=15429

[tex]z=\dfrac{15429-15451}{\dfrac{546}{\sqrt{350}}}\approx-0.75[/tex]

For x=15473

[tex]z=\dfrac{15473-15451}{\dfrac{546}{\sqrt{350}}}\approx0.75[/tex]

The required probability :-

[tex]P(15429<X<15473)=P(-0.75<z<0.75)\\\\=1-2(P(z<0.75))=1-2(0.2266274)=0.5467452\approx0.5467[/tex]

Hence, the required probability is 0.5467.

Answer:

The selling price is $46 approx.

Step-by-step explanation:

The cost price is = $35.87

Markup is 22% of selling price.

Let the selling price be = 100%

So, 100%-22%=78% = 0.78

So, solution is = [tex]35.87/0.78=45.98[/tex] ≈ $46.

Hence, the selling price is $46 approx.

To find the point on the plane that is nearest to (2,0,1), we minimize the squared distance between the two points using partial derivatives and set them equal to 0. The values of x, y, and z for the point are x = 28/13, y = 3/26, and z = 27/26.

To find the point on the plane that is nearest to (2,0,1), we need to find the coordinates that satisfy the equation 4x+3y+z=10 and minimize the distance between the point and (2,0,1).

This can be done by minimizing the squared distance between the two points. Using the formula for distance, we get the squared distance as:

d^2 = (x-2)^2 + y^2 + (z-1)^2

To minimize the squared distance, we can find the partial derivatives with respect to x, y, and z and set them equal to 0.

Solving these equations, we find that x = 28/13, y = 3/26, and z = 27/26.

https://brainly.com/question/34075842

#SPJ11

Answer:

my money= $192.5

Natalie's money= $110

Step-by-step explanation:

let my and Natalie's money be 7x and 4x respectively.

Now i gave $15 dollar to Natalie so now

my and Natalie's money will be (7x-15) and (4x+15) respectively.

now my money is 20% more than Natalie

therefore,

[tex]\frac{7x-15}{4x+15} =\frac{6}{5}[/tex]

now calculating for x  we get

x= 27.5

since, my and Natalie's money be 7x and 4x respectively

putting x=27.5

my money= $192.5

Natalie's money= $110

The minimum unit cost is approximately $42,330.09.

To find the minimum unit cost, we need to find the vertex of the quadratic function C(x) = 1.1x^2 - 638x + 111,541. The x-coordinate of the vertex can be found using the formula x = -b / 2a, where a = 1.1 and b = -638. Plugging in these values, we get:

x = -(-638) / (2 * 1.1) = 290.9090909

So the minimum unit cost occurs when approximately 291 engines are made. To find the minimum unit cost, we substitute this value back into the C(x) function:

C(291) = 1.1(291)^2 - 638(291) + 111,541 = 42330.090909

Therefore, the minimum unit cost is approximately $42,330.09.

https://brainly.com/question/35505962

#SPJ

Answer:

$5,211.30

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to calculate compound interest with the formula [tex]A=P(1+\frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

Where A =  Amount after maturity

           P = Principal amount ( $4,000)

           r = Rate of interest 13.3% in decimal ( 0.133)

           n = number of compounding period, monthly ( 12 )

            t = Time in years ( 2 )

Now we put the values in the formula

[tex]A=4,000(1+\frac{0.133}{12})^{(12\times 2)}[/tex]

[tex]A=4,000(1+0.0110833)^{(24)}[/tex]

[tex]A=4,000\times 1.0110833^{24}[/tex]

[tex]A=4,000\times 1.3028262297[/tex]

A =  $5,211.30

After 2 years investment would be $5,211.30.

Answer:

g(-0.5) = -1

g(0.2) = 0

g(0.5) = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the value of g(x) for which the x is defined.

Solving

g(-0.5) = -1

As given g(x) = -1 if -1.5 ≤ x ≤ 0.5

g(0.2) = 0

As given g(x) = 0 if -0.5 < x < 0.5

g(0.5) = 1

As given g(x) = 1 if 0.5 ≤ x < 1.5

Answer:

"Decreasing the sample size."

Step-by-step explanation:

The margin of error is :

[tex]ME=z\times \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

Therefore, as n decreases, margin of error increases.

In the question we are asked " Which action will not reduce the margin of error."

Therefore, the correct option for which action will not reduce the margin of error is "Decreasing the sample size."

Answer with explanation:

It is given that , n is Odd integer.

If , n is odd, then it can be Written as with the help of Euclid division lemma

 → n= 2 p +1, as 2 p is even , and adding 1 to it converts it into Odd.

As Euclid lemma states that for any three integers, a ,b and c ,when a is divided by b, gives quotient c and remainder r , then it can be written as:

 a= b c+r, →→0≤r<b

Now, n² will be of the form

(2 p +1)²=(2 p)²+2 × 2 p×1+ (1)²

             =4 p²+4 p +1

⇒Multiplying any positive or negative Integer by 4, gives Even integer and sum  or Difference of two even integer is always even.

So, 4 p²+4 p, will be an even term.But Adding , 1 to it converts it into Odd Integer.

Hence, if n is an Odd number then , n² will be also odd.

Answer: 0.2195

Step-by-step explanation:

Binomial distribution formula :-

[tex]P(x)=^nC_xp^x(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex], where P(x) is the probability of x successes in the n independent trials of the experiment and p is the probability of success.

Given : The probability of that the general population has blood type A = [tex]\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex]

Sample size : n=6

Now, the probability that exactly three of them have blood type A is given by :-

[tex]P(3)=^6C_3(\dfrac{1}{3})^3(1-\dfrac{1}{3})^{6-3}\\\\=\dfrac{6!}{3!3!}(\dfrac{1}{3})^3(\dfrac{2}{3})^{3}\\\\=0.219478737997\approx0.2195[/tex]

Therefore, the probability that exactly three of them have blood type A = 0.2195

Answer:

Mean of a Normal Distribution:

The mean of normal distribution is not always positive, it is equally distributed around mean,mode and median and can be any value from ranging from negative to positive to infinity.

Standard Deviation:

For the standard deviation, it can not be negative. It can only be equal to any positive values i.e., values [tex]\geq 0[/tex].

Answer: The explanation is as follows:

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) [8: 9, 3, 2, 1]

q = 8

Here, coalition is as follows:

[P1, P2, P3, P4] = [9, 3, 2, 1]

for the above coalition, the combined weight is

[P1, P2, P3, P4] = 9+3+2+1 = 15 ⇒ combined weight

For simplified weighted voting system;

q = combined weight ⇒ both the terms have to be equal for a simplified weighted voting system.

But, here 8 ≠ 15

∴ It is not a simplified weighted voting system.

(b) [20: 8, 6, 3, 2, 1]

q = 20

Here, coalition is as follows:

[P1, P2, P3, P4, P5] = [8, 6, 3, 2, 1]

for the above coalition, the combined weight is

[P1, P2, P3, P4, P5] = 8+6+3+2+1 = 20 ⇒ combined weight

For simplified weighted voting system;

q = combined weight

Since,  20 = 20

∴ It is a simplified weighted voting system.

Answer: 465

Step-by-step explanation:

251 (days) x 24 (hours) = 6,024 hours

6,024+21 hours= 6,045

6045/13=465

Answer:

The probability[tex]0.75095[/tex] and the parameter [tex]p=0.629[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for probability  in a binomial distribution is:

[tex]b(x;n,p)=\frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}\ast p^{x}\ast(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

where p is the probability of success (ticket with popcorn coupon), n is the number of trials (tickets bought) and x the number of successes desired. In this case p=0.629 (probability of buying a movie ticket with coupon), n=29,  and x=17,18,19, ...29.

[tex]b(17;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{17!(29-17)!}\ast0.629^{17}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-17}=0.133\,25\\ b(18;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{18!(29-18)!}\ast0.629^{18}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-18}=0.150\,61[/tex]

[tex]b(19;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{19!(29-19)!}\ast0.629^{19}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-19}=0.147\,84\\ b(20;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{20!(29-20)!}\ast0.629^{20}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-20}=0.125\,32 \\ b(21;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{21!(29-21)!}\ast0.629^{21}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-21}=0.091\,06 \\ b(22;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{22!(29-22)!}\ast0.629^{22}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-22}=0.056\,14[/tex]

[tex]b(23;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{23!(29-23)!}\ast0.629^{23}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-23}=2.896\,8\times10^{-2} \\ b(24;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{24!(29-24)!}\ast0.629^{24}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-24}=1.227\,8\times10^{-2}\\ b(25;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{25!(29-25)!}\ast0.629^{25}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-25}=4.163\,4\times10^{-3} \\ b(26;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{26!(29-26)!}\ast0.629^{26}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-26}=1.085\,9\times10^{-3} \\ b(27;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{27!(29-27)!}\ast0.629^{27}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-27}=2.045\,7\times10^{-4}[/tex]

[tex]b(28;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{28!(29-28)!}\ast0.629^{28}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-28}=2.477\,4\times10^{-5} \\ b(29;29,0.629)=\frac{29!}{29!(29-29)!}\ast0.629^{29}\ast(1-0.629)^{29-29}=1.448\,3\times10^{-6}[/tex]

The probability of more than 16 is equal to the sum of the probability of x=17, 17,18,19, ...29.

[tex]b(x>16;29,0.629)=0.13325+0.15061+0.14784+0.12532+0.09106+0.05614+2.8968\times10^{-2}+1.2278\times10^{-2}+4.1634\times10^{-3}+1.0859\times10^{-3}+2.0457\times10^{-4}+2.4774\times10^{-5}+1.4483\times10^{-6}=0.75095[/tex]

The numerical value of the parameter p in this binocular distribution scenario, where getting a popcorn coupon is defined as a success, is 0.629.

In this binomial distribution scenario, we are considering buying a movie ticket with a popcorn coupon as a success. The probability of success (p) is given as 0.629. Therefore, in this context, the numerical value of the parameter p for the binomial distribution is 0.629.

This means that each time a ticket is bought, there is a 0.629 chance (or 62.9%) of getting a popcorn coupon with the ticket. This probability stays constant with each new ticket purchase. In other words, the purchase of one ticket does not influence the likelihood of the outcome of the next ticket. This makes the scenario suitable to be modeled using a binomial distribution.

https://brainly.com/question/39749902

#SPJ3

Answer:

The center require to have a 4.6 inspectors, but this on you decide if you have 4 or 5 inspectors, it may not have 4.6 people working.

So then if you decide to have 5 people their utilization percentage is 83.3%, but if you decide to have 4 people their utilization rate will be 104.17% at the risk of defaulting on demand.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Define your variables

Demand rate= 50 vehicles per hour

Service rate = 12 vehicles per hour per inspector

Inspectors= a

2. Use the formule of the center´s utilization

U= [tex]\frac{Demand}{(Service) X a}[/tex]

0,9= [tex]\frac{50}{(12) X a }[/tex]

0,9a=[tex]\frac{50}{12}[/tex]

a=[tex]\frac{50}{12X0,9}[/tex]

a= 4.6

3. According to the center´s utilization formula the center require 4,6 inspectors, but approaches 5 because people cannot be divided. With this numbers of inspectors the utilization is:

U= [tex]\frac{Demand}{(Service) X (No. inspectors)}[/tex]

U= [tex]\frac{50}{(12) X (5)}[/tex]

U= 83,3%

4. Other option that you will be used is that the center require 4 inspectors. With this numbers of inspectors the utilization is:

U= [tex]\frac{Demand}{(Service) X (No. inspectors)}[/tex]

U= [tex]\frac{50}{(12) X (4)}[/tex]

U= 104,17%

The center would require 6 inspectors to have a target utilization of 90 percent.

To determine the number of inspectors required to have a target utilization of 90 percent, we can use the formula:

Number of inspectors = Total vehicles per hour / Vehicles inspected per inspector per hour / Target utilization

Given that the center tests 50 vehicles per hour, and each inspector can inspect 12 vehicles per hour, the formula becomes:

Number of inspectors = 50 / 12 / 0.9 = 5.56

Since we cannot have a fraction of an inspector, we round up to the nearest whole number. Therefore, the center would require 6 inspectors to have a target utilization of 90 percent.

https://brainly.com/question/36071752

#SPJ3

Answer:

[tex]y=3e^{-4t}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]y''+5y'+4y=0[/tex]

Applying the Laplace transform:

[tex]\mathcal{L}[y'']+5\mathcal{L}[y']+4\mathcal{L}[y']=0[/tex]

With the formulas:

[tex]\mathcal{L}[y'']=s^2\mathcal{L}[y]-y(0)s-y'(0)[/tex]

[tex]\mathcal{L}[y']=s\mathcal{L}[y]-y(0)[/tex]

[tex]\mathcal{L}[x]=L[/tex]

[tex]s^2L-3s+5sL-3+4L=0[/tex]

Solving for [tex]L[/tex]

[tex]L(s^2+5s+4)=3s+3[/tex]

[tex]L=\frac{3s+3}{s^2+5s+4}[/tex]

[tex]L=\frac{3(s+1)}{(s+1)(s+4)}[/tex]

[tex]L=\frac3{s+4}[/tex]

Apply the inverse Laplace transform with this formula:

[tex]\mathcal{L}^{-1}[\frac1{s-a}]=e^{at}[/tex]

[tex]y=3\mathcal{L}^{-1}[\frac1{s+4}]=3e^{-4t}[/tex]

Answer: The mean number of checks written per​ day =  [tex]\lambda=0.3507[/tex]

[tex]\text{Variance}(\sigma^2)=\lambda=0.3507[/tex]

[tex]\text{Standard deviation}=0.5922[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : A person wrote 128 checks in last year.

Consider , the last year is a no-leap year.

The number of days in ;last year = 365 days

Let X be the number of checks in one day.

Then , [tex]X=\dfrac{128}{365}=0.350684931507\approx0.3507[/tex]

The mean number of checks written per​ day =  [tex]\lambda=0.3507[/tex]

Now X follows Poisson distribution with parameter [tex]\lambda=0.3507[/tex].

Then , [tex]\text{Variance}(\sigma^2)=\lambda=0.3507[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow\sigma=\sqrt{\lambda}=\sqrt{0.3507}=0.59219929078\approx0.5922[/tex]

Given:

Probability of winning, P(X) = 0.02

Probability of losing, P([tex]\bar{X}[/tex]) = 0.98

Wining amount = $160

Losing amount = $16

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the expected amount of money win be  'X'

Expected value of X, E(X) = Probability of winning, P(X).Probability of winning, P(X)  - Probability of losing, P([tex]\bar{X}[/tex]).Losing amount

Now,

E(X) = ([tex]0.02\times 160 - 0.98\times 16[/tex])

E(X) = -12.48

Expected value of X = -12.48

Expected loss value = $12.48 loss

Check the picture below.

Answer: SECOND OPTION.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is important to remember that a tangent to a circle is a line that touches it at one point. This point is called "Point of tangency". By definition, the angle between the tangent and the radius is 90 degrees.

In this case you can observe that EF is the radius of this circle, therefore, the angle between EF and FH measures 90 degrees.

Based on this, you can say the following:

[tex]\angle EFH=90\°[/tex]

This matches with the second option.

Answer:

  (-1, -1)

Step-by-step explanation:

One way to write the relationship between the x and y coordinates and θ is ...

  tan(θ) = y/x

Then ...

  y = x·tan(θ) = -1·tan(-3π/4) = -1·1

  y = -1

The coordinates of the point on the terminal side are (x, y) = (-1, -1).

Answer:

Option D. $850.64; $91.14

Step-by-step explanation:

Joyce Meadow pays her three workers per week  $160, $470 and $800 respectively.

A year has 52 weeks, Therefore quarter has [tex]\frac{52}{4}[/tex] = 13 weeks.

So for a quarter she pays = 160 × 13 = $2,080, 470 × 13 = $6,110, 800 × 13 = $10,400

State rate is 5.6%

Federal rate is 0.6%

Base is $7,000

It means the unemployment needs to be paid on the first $7000 only

So the state unemployment = (0.056 × 2,080) + (0.056 × 6,110) + (0.056 × 7,000)

= 116.48 + 342.16 + 392 = $850.64

Federal unemployment = (0.006 × 2,080) + (0.006 × 6,110) + (0.006 × 7,000)

= 12.48 + 36.66 + 42 = $91.14

Option D. is the correct answer.

Answer:

20 percent *90. =

(20:100)*90. =

(20*90.):100 =

1800:100 = 18

The correct answer is C.

Answer:

A. 15 and 0. B. 15 and 17

Step-by-step explanation:

A. a= 13 and b = 195.

b div a = 195 div 13. The result is the integer part of the division, so

195 div 13 = 15.

b mod a = 195 mod 13. The result is the residue of the division. In this case the division is exact, so

195 mod 13 = 0.

B. a = 24 and b=377.

b div a = 377 div 24. The result is the integer part of the division, so

377 div 24 = 15.

b mod a = 377 mod 24. The result is the residue of the division. In this case the division is not exact, so

377 = 24*15+17, then

377 mod 24 = 17.

Answer:

[tex]x=1+\dfrac{3}{1-Ke^{3t}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that

[tex]\dfrac{dx}{dt}=x^2-5x+4[/tex]

This is a differential equation.

Now by separating variables

[tex]\dfrac{dx}{x^2-5x+4}=dt[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{dx}{(x-1)(x-4)}=dt[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{1}{3}\left(\dfrac{1}{x-4}-\dfrac{1}{x-1}\right)dx=dt[/tex]

Now by integrating both side

[tex]\int\dfrac{1}{3}\left(\dfrac{1}{x-4}-\dfrac{1}{x-1}\right)dx=\int dt[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{1}{3}\left(\ln(x-4)-\ln(x-1)\right )=t+C[/tex]

Where C is the constant

[tex]\dfrac{1}{3}\ln\dfrac{x-4}{x-1}=t+C[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{x-4}{x-1}=Ke^{3t}[/tex]    K is the constant.

[tex]x=1+\dfrac{3}{1-Ke^{3t}}[/tex]

So the solution of above differential equation is

[tex]x=1+\dfrac{3}{1-Ke^{3t}}[/tex]