Answer:
4) increased by $19,208
Explanation:
Net inventory purchased = Purchase - Purchase return = $20,000 - $400 = $19,600
Payment of freight made outward for purchase return is not part of inventory thus $100 freight ignored.
Now terms of purchase provide 2% discount if payment made within 10 days, and total credit period = 30 days.
Given payment made within discount period thus discount availed =
$19,600 X 2% = $392
Net value of inventory = $19,600 - $392 (Discount Availed) = $19,208
On the whole inventory will increase with this value.
Correct option is 4) increased by $19,208
Phil Phoenix is paid on a monthly basis. For the month of January of the current year, he earned a total of $9,138. FICA tax for Social Security is 6.2% and the FICA tax for Medicare is 1.45%. The FUTA tax rate is 0.8%, and the SUTA tax rate is 5.4%. Both unemployment taxes are applied to the first $7,000 of an employee's pay. The amount of Federal Income Tax withheld from his earnings was $1,516.27. What is the amount of the employer's annual payroll taxes expenses for this employee?
Answer:
the amount of employers annual payroll taxes expenses for his employee is $1133.06
Explanation:
For calculating the employers payroll taxes expenses for his employee , we will add the amount that he has to pay for in social security tax, medicare tax and Federal unemployment tax act and State unemployment tax act tax.
EMPLOYERS PAYROLL TAX =
Social security tax + Medicare tax + FUTA tax + SUTA tax
An important point to understand here is that the social security tax and medicare tax would be calculated on the income earned by Phil in month of January and the FUTA(federal unemployment tax act) and SUTA(state unemployment tax act) taxes would be calculated on the first $7000 of Phil as it is given in the question that the unemployment taxes are calculated on first $7000 of employee.
= $9138 x 6.2% + $9138 x 1.45% + $7000 x .08% + $7000 x 5.4%
= $566.556 + $132.501 + $56 + $378
= $1133.057
= $1133.06 (approximate)
Find the following values for a lump sum assuming annual compounding. a. The future value of $800 invested at 7% for one year b. The future value of $800 invested at 7% for five years c. The present value of $800 invested at 7% for one year d. The present value of $800 invested at 7% for five years
Answer:
For the first 2 we calculate the future value:
(A)856
(B)1,122.04
(C) and (D) thre present value will be 800
Explanation:
[tex]Principal * (1+ r)^{time} = Ammount[/tex]
[tex]800* (1+ 0.07)^{1} = Ammount[/tex]
856
[tex]800* (1+ 0.07)^{5} = Ammount[/tex]
1,122.041358
[tex]\frac{856}{(1 + 0.07)^{1} } = 800[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1,122.04}{(1 + 0.07)^{5} } = 800[/tex]
Gallerani Corporation has received a request for a special order of 5,700 units of product A90 for $27.90 each. Product A90's unit product cost is $27.35, determined as follows: Direct materials $ 3.05 Direct labor 8.35 Variable manufacturing overhead 7.45 Fixed manufacturing overhead 8.50 Unit product cost $ 27.35 Assume that direct labor is a variable cost. The special order would have no effect on the company's total fixed manufacturing overhead costs. The customer would like modifications made to product A90 that would increase the variable costs by $4.20 per unit and that would require an investment of $21,000 in special molds that would have no salvage value. This special order would have no effect on the company's other sales. The company has ample spare capacity for producing the special order. The annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company as a result of accepting this special order should be:
Answer:
The annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company as a result of accepting this special order should be $6,645
Explanation:
Company's current variable expenses = Direct Material + Direct Labor + Variable Manufacturing Overhead.
= $3.05 + $8.35 + $7.45 = $18.85
Note: Fixed expenses will not be considered as for this purpose, because they are already incurred and its within the capacity of company, to produce such additional units, here the decision will be based on additional cost which are variable cost and additional mold cost of $21,000 and variable cost of $4.20 per unit.
If we would have considered absorption costing then the normal fixed cost would also have been considered.
Here Total cost of 5,700 units = Total variable cost = $18.85 + $4.20 = $23.05
Fixed Cost = $21,000
Total = $23.05 [tex]\times[/tex] 5,700 + $21,000
= $131,385 + $21,000 = $152,385
Revenue from these 5,700 units = $27.90 [tex]\times[/tex] 5,700 = $159,030
Net result = $159,030 - $152,385 = $6,645
Since the result is positive with a financial advantage of $6,645 the project shall be accepted.
Final Answer
The annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company as a result of accepting this special order should be $6,645
Refer to the following list of liability balances at December 31, 2018. Accounts Payable $ 18,000 Employee Health Insurance Payable 1,350 Employee Income Tax Payable 1,100 Estimated Warranty Payable (Due 2019) 900 Long-Term Notes Payable (Due 2022) 40,000 FICAlong dashOASDI Taxes Payable 560 Sales Tax Payable 870 Mortgage Payable (Due 2023) 14,000 Bonds Payable (Due 2024) 63,000 Current Portion of Long-Term Notes Payable 6,500 What is the total amount of current liabilities?
Answer:
Total current Liabilities $29,280
Explanation:
Accounts Payable $18,000
Employee Health Insurance Payable $1,350
Employee Income Tax Payable $1,100
Estimated Warranty Payable $900
FICA&OASDI Taxes Payable $560
Sales Tax Payable $870
Current Portion of
Long-Term Notes Payable $6,500
Total current Liabilities $29,280
Remember:
current liabilities will be obligation to pay or do that will be settle within a year.
The current liabilities listed total $29,280. These include Accounts Payable, Employee Health and Income Tax Payables, Estimated Warranty Payable, FICA-OASDI Taxes Payable, Sales Tax Payable, and the Current Portion of Long-Term Notes Payable. Long-term payables such as Mortgage Payable are not considered current.
Explanation:Current liabilities are debts or obligations that are due within the current year or operating cycle, whichever is longer. When totaled, the current liabilities listed in your question would include:
Accounts Payable, $18,000 Employee Health Insurance Payable, $1,350 Employee Income Tax Payable, $1,100 Estimated Warranty Payable, $900 FICA-OASDI Taxes Payable, $560 Sales Tax Payable, $870 Current Portion of Long-Term Notes Payable, $6,500
All of these items are to be paid within the year. Therefore, total current liabilities would be $29,280. Notes such as the Mortgage Payable and long-term notes that are not due within the current year are not considered current liabilities.
Learn more about Current Liabilities here:https://brainly.com/question/32361397
#SPJ2
What are the most likely reasons a us corporation would open a factory in china? Check all that apply.
a. to take advantage of affordable land pricesb. to take advantage of abundant resourcesc. to take advantage of lower labor costsd. to take advantage of favorable tax laws
Answer:
The correct answer is: All of them apply.
Explanation:
Typically, when a company plans to start operations abroad it is to reduce costs which eventually will imply getting higher revenues. Cheaper labor hand, resources, infrastructure or discrete government intervention in businesses impulse major firms to go off-shore.
Niemann Company has a SUTA tax rate of 7.1%. The taxable payroll for the year for FUTA and SUTA is $82,600. The amount of FUTA tax for the year is: a. $495.60 b. $4,956 c. $5,864.60 d. $420 e. none of the above
Answer:
a. $495.60
Explanation:
It is asking for the amount of FUTA
The FUTA rate is 6% but Niemann is paying their State taxes so it get's a discount for 5.4%
His FUTA rate is then 0.6%
[tex]taxable \: payroll \times FUTA[/tex]
82,600 x 0.06 = 495.6
The FUTA tax for the year for Niemann Company which has a taxable payroll of $82,600 is $420. This is calculated by multiplying the first $7,000 of each employee's wages (which is the FUTA taxable wage base) by the FUTA tax rate (6.0%). The answer is (d) $420.
Explanation:The FUTA tax rate is 6.0% for the first $7,000 of each employee's wages. Therefore, if Niemann Company has a taxable payroll of $82,600, the FUTA tax for the year would be $420. This is calculated by taking the taxable payroll up to $7,000 and multiplying by the FUTA tax rate of 6.0%.
Step-by-step calculation:
Identify the FUTA taxable wage base which is $7,000 in this case.Multiply the taxable wage base by the FUTA tax rate. So, $7,000 * 6.0% = $420.Therefore, the answer is (d) $420.
Learn more about FUTA tax calculation here:https://brainly.com/question/32070315
#SPJ3
Ellie has been working for an engineering firm and earning an annual salary of $80,000. She decides to open her own engineering business. Her annual expenses will include $15,000 for office rent, $3,000 for equipment rental, $1,000 for supplies, $1,200 for utilities, and a $35,000 salary for a secretary/bookkeeper. Ellie will cover her start-up expenses by cashing in a $20,000 certificate of deposit on which she was earning annual interest of $500. Refer to Scenario 13-9. Ellie's annual economic costs will equal?A. $75,200. B. $55,200. C. $80,500. D. $135,700.
Answer: Option D
Explanation: Economic cost is the total cost a firm bears in the form of expenses incurred and opportunity cost incurred. Opportunity cost can be defined as the loss of profit for choosing one alternative over other.
In the given case salary and interest on certificate of deposit is the opportunity cost for Ellie.
so,
Economic cost = $80,000 + $15000 + $3000 + $1000 + $1200 + $35,000 + $500
= $135,700
Consider each of these business activities. For which do you think supply would be most elastic in the short term?a. producing feature moviesb. building skyscrapersc. providing health cared. baking cupcakes
Final answer:
Among the given options, the supply of baking cupcakes has the most elasticity in the short term due to the quick production process and the ease of increasing quantity supplied.
Explanation:
In evaluating the elasticity of supply in the short term for different industries, we must consider how quickly producers can respond to a price increase with a higher quantity supplied. When it comes to producing feature movies, building skyscrapers, and providing health care, these require significant time investments, whether for production, construction, or training medical staff, resulting in relatively inelastic supply curves. Conversely, the process of baking cupcakes can be quickly adjusted to changes in demand. Ingredients are readily available, and the production time is short. Therefore, in the short term, the supply for cupcakes would be the most elastic among the listed activities due to its quick reaction to cost changes and the ability to increase quantity supplied (Qs) without significant delays.
Ramirez Company installs a computerized manufacturing machine in its factory at the beginning of the year at a cost of $47,500. The machine's useful life is estimated at 10 years, or 405,000 units of product, with a $7,000 salvage value. During its second year, the machine produces 34,500 units of product. Determine the machine's second-year depreciation using the double-declining-balance method.
Answer:
Dep expense for the second year 7,600
Explanation:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}Year&Beginning&Dep-Expense&Acc. \: Dep&Ending\\0&-&-&-&47500\\1&47,500&9,500&9,500&38,000\\2&38,000&7,600&17,100&30,400\\\end{array}\right][/tex]
1/10 = straight-line method
straight-line x 2 = DD rate
47,500 x 2/10 = 9500
then we calculate the DD rate again with the book value
47,500-9,500 = 38,000
38,000 x 2/10 = 7,600
Final answer:
The second-year depreciation of Ramirez Company's machine using the double-declining-balance method is $7,600, calculated by doubling the straight-line depreciation rate to 20% and applying it to the book value at the beginning of the second year.
Explanation:
Calculating Second-Year Depreciation with Double-Declining-Balance Method
To calculate the second-year depreciation using the double-declining-balance method for Ramirez Company's computerized manufacturing machine, we can follow these steps:
Determine the depreciation rate. Since the useful life of the machine is 10 years, the straight-line depreciation rate would be 1 / 10, or 10%. The double-declining rate is twice the straight-line rate, so it would be 20%.
Compute the book value at the beginning of the second year by subtracting the first year's depreciation from the cost. The first year's depreciation would also be 20% of the cost ($47,500 ×20% = $9,500). Hence, the book value at the beginning of the second year would be $47,500 - $9,500 = $38,000.
Apply the double-declining rate to the book value at the beginning of the second year to find the second-year depreciation expense. So, the second year's depreciation is $38,000 ×20% = $7,600.
Remember, the salvage value does not figure into the calculation until the book value is close to the salvage value.
Thus, the machine's second-year depreciation using the double-declining-balance method is $7,600.
In preparing its cash flow statement for the year ended December 31, 2018, Red Co. gathered the following data: Gain on sale of land $ 12,400 Proceeds from sale of land 24,000 Purchase of Blue, Inc., bonds (face value $210,000) 353,000 Amortization of bond discount 4,300 Cash dividends declared 95,000 Cash dividends paid 75,000 Proceeds from sales of Red Co. common stock 155,000 In its December 31, 2018, statement of cash flows, what amount should Red report as net cash outflows from investing activities?
Answer:
The $329,000 is the amount which should Red report as net cash outflows from investing activities.
Explanation:
Investing Activities : The investing activities is that activities in which the purchase of fixed assets and intangible assets is to be recorded. Other expenses will not be considered.
So,
The net cash outflow from investing activities = Purchase of Blue, Inc., bonds - Proceeds from sale of land
= $353,000 - $24,000
= $329,000
The Gain on sale of land is an operating activity.
The amortization of bond discount is also an operating activity.
Cash dividends declared is an financing activity.
Cash dividends paid is also an financing activity.
Proceeds from sales of Red Co. common stock is also an financing activity.
So, these costs is not considered.
Thus, the $329,000 is the amount which should Red report as net cash outflows from investing activities.
Final answer:
Red Co. should report a net cash outflow from investing activities of $329,000 in its statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018. This is calculated by subtracting the cash inflows from the sale of land ($24,000) from the cash outflows for the purchase of bonds ($353,000).
Explanation:
When preparing a statement of cash flows, Red Co. should report a net cash outflow from investing activities by considering the following items:
Proceeds from the sale of land are cash inflows from investing activities.Purchase of Blue, Inc., bonds is a cash outflow for investing activities.Amortization of bond discount is not considered in the cash flow statement as it is a non-cash expense reflected in the operating section via adjustments.To calculate net cash outflows from investing activities:
Add up all cash outflows related to investing activities: Purchasing bonds ($353,000)Subtract any cash inflows related to investing activities: Sale of land ($24,000)Therefore, the net cash outflows from investing activities is calculated as $353,000 (cash out) - $24,000 (cash in) = $329,000.
Most real-world choices aren't about getting all of one thing or another, instead, most choices involve _________________, which involves comparing the benefits and costs of choosing a little more or a little less of a good. utility opportunity cost benefit analysis marginal analysis
Answer:
marginal analysis
Explanation:
Most real-world choices aren't about getting all of one thing or another, instead, most choices involve marginal analysis, which involves comparing the benefits and costs of choosing a little more or a little less of a good.
Most real-world choices aren't about getting all of one thing or another, instead, most choices involve marginal analysis, which involves comparing the benefits and costs of choosing a little more or a little less of a good. Hence, option D is correct.
What is marginal analysis?Marginal analysis involves dividing a choice into a number of "yes or no" options. More particularly, it contrasts the higher costs that the same activity incurs with the increased benefits that it provides.
For instance, a marginal analysis reveals that hiring a second worker for manufacturing would result in a net marginal advantage if the company has the funds to do so. Or, to put it another way, the potential for producing more things balances out the increase in labour costs.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about marginal analysis, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14513809
#SPJ2
On December 31, Year 2, Case, Inc., had 300,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Case issued a 10% stock dividend on July 1, Year 3. On October 1, Year 3, Case purchased 24,000 shares of its common stock for its treasury and recorded the purchase by the cost method. What number of shares should be used in computing basic earnings per share for the year ended December 31, Year 3?
Answer: the correct answer is 324,000.
Explanation:
The requirement is to determine the number of shares to be used in computing year 2 basic earnings per share (EPS). For EPS purposes, shares of stock issued as a result of stock dividends or splits should be considered outstanding for the entire period in which they were issued. Therefore, both the original 300,000 shares and the additional 30,000 shares (10% × 300,000) are treated as outstanding for the entire year. The 10/1/Y2 purchase of 24,000 treasury shares results in a weighted-average deduction of 6,000 shares (3/12 × 24,000) because the shares were not outstanding for only 3 months during year 2. Therefore, the number of shares for EPS computations is 324,000.
The Mixing Department of Complete Foods had 62,000 equivalent units of materials for October. Of the 62,000 units, 38,000 units were completed and transferred to the next department, and 24,000 units were 20% complete. Complete Foods's costs per equivalent unit of production are $ 0.75 for direct materials and $ 0.55 for conversion costs. All of the materials are added at the beginning of the process. Conversion costs are added evenly throughout the process and the company uses the weighted-average method.
Answer:
Materials
62,000 equivalent units
Conversion
42,800 Equivalent untis
Cost of finished Goods
38,000 x (.75 + .55) = 38,000 x 1.3 = $49,400
WIP
24,000 x .75 = 18,000
4,800 x .55 = 2,640
Total WIP 20,640
Explanation:
Equivalent Units
38,000 complete
20% of 24,000 WIP = 4,800
Equivalent Units CC = 42,800
x .55 CC = 23540
Materials
62,000 x .75 = $46,500
According to the condition, the total costs accounted for Direct materials are $46,500.00, Conversion Costs are $ 23,540.00, and total costs are $70,040.00.
The weighted average considers the relative relevance or frequency of several elements in a data collection.
A weighted average can be more accurate than a simple average in some cases.
Each data point value is multiplied by the allotted weight in a weighted average, which is then totaled and divided by the number of data points.
Here,
Compute the total cost accounted as follows:
Particulars Direct Conversion Total
Cost Cost Cost
Completed $
transferred out $28,500 $20,900 $49,400
Ending Work
In Process $18,000 $2,640 $20,640
Total costs accounted $ 46,500 $ 23,540 $ 70,040
Therefore, the following total cost accounted for as follows:
Direct materials = $46,500.00Conversion Costs are $ 23,540.00Total costs are $70,040.00.To know more about the weighted-average method, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28565969
#SPJ2
This is an incomplete question, the complete question is:
he Mixing Department of Complete Foods had 62,000 equivalent units of materials for October. Of the 62,000 units, 38,000 units were completed and transferred to the next department, and 24.000 units were 20% complete. Complete Foods' costs per equivalent unit of production are $0.75 for direct materials and $0.55 for conversion costs. All of the materials are added at the beginning of the process. Conversion costs are added evenly throughout the process and the company uses the weighted average method.
Calculate the cost of the 38,000 units completed and transferred out and the 24,000 units, 20% complete, in the ending Work-in-Process Inventory
A real estate developer is evaluating a 40-unit apartment development. The expected average occupancy is 90%. Cost of land: $1,200,000 Construction: $$4,800,000 Project Life: 25 years Maintenance: $100 per unit per year (regardless of weather a unit is occupied). Annual insurance and property taxes: $400,000 Required return: 12% per year (0.9489% per month) Assume that the building will have NO salvage value at the end of 25 years, BUT the land will appreciate at a rate of 5% per year. Determine the total minimum monthly rent (all units combined) that should be charged, given the required return.
Answer:
Monthly Rent = 92825.46
Explanation:
[tex]C * \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\[/tex]
Total investment 6,000,000
Income per year: X
rate of return 0.009489 per month
time 25 years x 12 months = 300
We will solve for the monthly income of the project.
[tex]C * \frac{1-(1.009489)^{-300} }{0.009489} = 6,000,000\\[/tex]
This should be the net income per month $60,492.12803
Now well do the monthly income statment to solve for rent:
Rent + Aprreciation of land - Property tax - maintenance = net income
Rent + 1,200,000 x 0.05/12 - 400,000/12 - 100 x 40 = 60492.13
Rent = 60492.13 - 5000 + 33333.33 + 4,000 = 92825.46
Kenny Electric Company's noncallable bonds were issued several years ago and now have 20 years to maturity. These bonds have a 9.25% annual coupon, paid semiannually, sells at a price of $1,075, and has a par value of $1,000. If the firm's tax rate is 40%, what is the component cost of debt for use in the WACC calculation?a. 4.35% b. 4.58% c. 4.83% d. 5.08% e. 5.33%
Answer:
d. 5.08%
Explanation:
We have to first calculate the YTM of the bond, and then apply the tax shield.
To get the YTM we have to calculate the rate of return of an annuity of 46.25 for 20 years compounding semiannually at IRR rate and the present value of the face value redeem in 20 years.
[tex]C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} +Face\:Value/(1+rate)^{time}= PV\\[/tex]
[tex]46.25 \times \frac{1-(1+IRR/2)^{-20*2} }{rate} + 1000/(1+IRR)^{20}= 1075\\[/tex]
IRR = 0.084656891 (it should be done using financial calculator or excel or a similar software program)
then we apply the shield tax to the IRR:
IRR x (1 - tax-rate) = Cost of debt
0.084656891 * ( 1 - 0.4) = 5.0794= 5.08
The component cost of debt for Kenny Electric Company's bonds requires calculating the yield to maturity (YTM) and adjusting for taxes. For the water company's $10,000 ten-year bond at 6%, when market rates rise to 9%, the price paid for the bond would be less than $10,000. The exact value would be calculated by discounting the bond's future cash flows at the new market rate.
Explanation:The question involves calculating the component cost of debt for use in the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for Kenny Electric Company's noncallable bonds with a 9.25% annual coupon rate, paid semiannually, a selling price of $1,075, a par value of $1,000, and a remaining maturity of 20 years. To calculate this, we need to determine the yield to maturity (YTM) on a semiannual basis and then adjust for the company's tax rate. The YTM reflects the total return an investor would expect if they purchased the bond at its current price and held it until maturity.
For the provided scenario regarding the water company's $10,000 ten-year bond with a 6% interest rate, if you are looking to buy the bond one year before maturity when the market interest rates have risen to 9%, you would expect to pay less than $10,000 for the bond. This is because the bond's fixed coupon payments are less attractive when new issues offer a higher rate, hence the price of the bond must decrease to align with the current yield expectations of potential investors.
To calculate what you would be willing to pay for the bond, you need to calculate the present value of the bond's future cash flows (interest and principal repayment) discounted at the new market interest rate of 9%. With only one year and one coupon payment left, the bond is essentially a one-year fixed income investment, making the math simpler. However, since the original question does not provide the calculation for Kenny Electric Company's bonds, we cannot provide the answer from the multiple choices given for the component cost of debt. In both cases, it is crucial to remember that bond prices are inversely related to market interest rate movements and the discounting process is essential in bond valuation.
An investigator conducting a study of a medical device under an ide is required to complete and sign what?
An investigator conducting a study of a medical device under an IDE is required to complete and sign an Investigator's Agreement or Statement of Investigator (SOI).
Explanation:An investigator conducting a study of a medical device under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) is required to complete and sign an Investigator's Agreement or Statement of Investigator (SOI).
This document is a legally binding agreement between the investigator and the sponsor of the study, which outlines the responsibilities and obligations of the investigator. It is important for the investigator to fully understand the terms of the agreement before signing it.
The Investigator's Agreement or SOI typically includes information such as the purpose of the study, the investigator's qualifications, the study protocol, the sponsor's responsibilities, and the investigator's responsibilities.
Learn more about Investigator's Agreement or Statement of Investigator (SOI) here:https://brainly.com/question/32053765
#SPJ6
An investigator conducting a study of a medical device under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) must complete and sign an Informed Consent Form. This form outlines the risks and benefits of the study and ensures the participant's understanding and agreement. An IND application is also a requirement before clinical trials can start.
Explanation:An investigator conducting a study of a medical device, under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE), is required to complete and sign an Informed Consent Form. This crucial document outlines all the potential risks and benefits of participating in the study. The aim is to ensure that the subjects participating in the study are fully aware and agree to the conditions laid out before the study commences.
Among other things, Informed Consent typically contains information about why the research is being conducted, how the collected data will be used, and the extent to which the subject's identity will remain anonymous. It also covers the specific details of the participant’s role in the study, including their right to withdraw from the study at any point.
Additionally, before initiating any clinical trials involving human subjects, the researchers need to submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) application to the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). This application includes substantial data collected from previous laboratory and animal trials, as well other clinical and manufacturing details related to the new device.
Learn more about Informed Consent here:https://brainly.com/question/30321490
#SPJ6
Indicate all items in the following list that are not consumption goods and services and explain why.Item a: A chocolate barItem b: A ski liftItem c: A golf ballItem d: A shopping mallItem e: A trainItem f: A golf course
Answer: Option B, D , E
Explanation: In simple words, goods which are not used in the production of other goods rather consumed by the individual to satisfy current wants is called consumer goods.
So, form the above explanation we can conclude that a chocolate bar and a golf ball are consumer goods among all options.
.
B. A ski lift will be used continuously by the owner for its business operation. Hence, not a consumer good.
D. A shopping mall cannot be considered a good. It is a fixed asset to the entity owning it. Hence, not a consumer good.
E. A train will continuously used by the organisation owning it for its business purpose. Hence , not a consumer good.
Suppose you are the money manager of a $5.38 million investment fund. The fund consists of four stocks with the following investments and betas: Stock Investment Beta A $ 440,000 1.50 B 800,000 (0.50 ) C 1,540,000 1.25 D 2,600,000 0.75 If the market's required rate of return is 10% and the risk-free rate is 6%, what is the fund's required rate of return? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.
Answer:
I wanna say its C 1,540,000
Duane owns his own real estate company. The Bureau of Labor Statistics counts Duane as A. unemployed and not in the labor force. B. employed and in the labor force. C. employed and not in the labor force. D. unemployed and in the labor force.
Answer:
Duane owns his own real estate company. The Bureau of Labor Statistics counts Duane as employed and in the labor force.-B.
Duane, who owns his own real estate company, is considered employed and in the labor force (B) according to the classifications used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for employment status.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the adult population is divided into three categories based on employment status: employed, unemployed, and those not in the labor force. An employed person is someone who is currently working for pay. Unemployed persons are those who are out of work but actively looking for a job. Those who are not in the labor force are neither employed nor actively seeking employment.
The student asked where Duane, who owns his own real estate company, is categorized by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Since Duane is working at his company, he is employed and considered to be in the labor force. Therefore, the correct answer is B. employed and in the labor force.
Whitman Company has just completed its first year of operations. The company’s absorption costing income statement for the year follows: Whitman Company Income Statement Sales (40,000 units × $42.60 per unit) $ 1,704,000 Cost of goods sold (40,000 units × $21 per unit) 840,000 Gross margin 864,000 Selling and administrative expenses 460,000 Net operating income $ 404,000 The company’s selling and administrative expenses consist of $300,000 per year in fixed expenses and $4 per unit sold in variable expenses. The $21 unit product cost given above is computed as follows: Direct materials $ 11 Direct labor 3 Variable manufacturing overhead 3 Fixed manufacturing overhead ($196,000 ÷ 49,000 units) 4 Absorption costing unit product cost $ 21 Required: 1. Redo the company’s income statement in the contribution format using variable costing. 2. Reconcile any difference between the net operating income on your variable costing income statement and the net operating income on the absorption costing income statement above.
Answer:
1. Preparing Contribution Income statement
Sales = 40,000 units X $42.60 = $1,704,000
Less: Variable Costs
Direct Material = $11 X 40,000 = $440,000
Direct Labor = $3 X 40,000 = $120,000
Variable Manufacturing Overhead = $3 X 40,000 = $120,000
Variable Selling Expenses = $4 X 40,000 = $160,000
Total Variable Costs = ($840,000)
Contribution Margin = $864,000
Less: Fixed Costs
Selling & Administrative = $300,000
Manufacturing Overheads = $196,000
Total Fixed Cost = ($496,000)
Net Operating Income = $368,000
2. Now we have net income as per Contribution statement = $368,000 and net income as per Absorption Costing = $404,000
This difference is because of Fixed Manufacturing Overheads
Under Absorption costing Fixed Manufacturing Overheads charged = $196,000 ÷ 49,000 units = $4 per unit X 40,000 units = $160,000 whereas in contribution statement it is charged fully.
Under absorption costing even fixed costs are charged based on the number of units produced, whereas in income statement is it charged completely irrespective of the units produced as that value is fixed and cannot be avoided on per unit basis.
Difference = $404,000 - $368,000 = $36,000
Manufacturing cost for 9,000 units (49,000 - 40,000) = at the rate of $4 = $36,000
In case cost of fixed manufacturing overhead is reduced by $36,000 then profit will be increased to $368,000 + $36,000 = $404,000 same as of absorption costing.
Using variable costing, we compute the variable costs and subtract from sales to get the contribution margin. Fixed costs are then subtracted to get the net operating income. The difference between absorption costing and variable costing net operating income is due to the treatment of fixed manufacturing overhead.
Explanation:Variable costing distinguishes between fixed and variable costs, and treats only variable costs as product costs. Accordingly, the per-unit product cost under variable costing would be $17 (Direct materials $11 + Direct labor $3 + Variable manufacturing overhead $3).
Next, let's compute the sales, variable costs, and contribution margin:
Sales: $1,704,000Variable Costs (Unit costs of $17 x 40,000 units sold + Variable selling and administrative expenses of $4 x 40,000 units): $840,000Contribution Margin (Sales – Variable Costs): $864,000Subtract fixed costs (Fixed manufacturing overhead of $196,000 and fixed selling/administrative costs of $300,000) from the contribution margin to get the net operating income under variable costing: $368,000.
So, the difference between the net operating income under absorption costing ($404,000) and variable costing ($368,000) is $36,000. The reason for the higher net operating income under absorption costing is because some fixed manufacturing overhead was included in the cost of goods sold, reducing reported cost of goods sold and thereby increasing net operating income.
Learn more about Variable costing here:https://brainly.com/question/31811001
#SPJ3
Assume that a monsoon destroys the coffee crop in Vietnam, one of the world's largest coffee producers. What will likely occur?
The price of sugar and creamer will increase.
People will consume more coffee.
Consumers will try to find alternatives to coffee due to increases in the price of coffee.
There will be no change in the market for coffee.
Answer: The correct answer is "Consumers will try to find alternatives to coffee due to increases in the price of coffee."
Explanation:
When the coffee harvest in Vietnam is destroyed, the supply of coffee decreases, this causes its price to increase due to the law of supply and demand, therefore consumers will try to find alternatives to coffee.
Final answer:
A monsoon destroying the coffee crop in Vietnam will likely lead to increases in the price of coffee, prompting consumers to seek alternatives to coffee. It will not lead to more coffee consumption or an increase in the price of sugar and creamer, nor will it leave the coffee market unchanged.
Explanation:
When a monsoon destroys the coffee crop in Vietnam, a significant coffee producer, the immediate consequence would be a decrease in the supply of coffee. According to the laws of supply and demand, when the supply of a product decreases but the demand remains unchanged, the price of the product is likely to increase. In this scenario, consumers will experience increases in the price of coffee. Due to the higher coffee prices, consumers could potentially seek alternatives to coffee such as tea or other caffeinated beverages.
This situation is analogous to issues seen in South America, where coffee production decreases led to noticeable price increases, prompting suppliers and businesses to endure financial strain. Similar to how a drought in Thailand raised sugarcane prices, the loss of coffee crops in Vietnam would drive up coffee prices. Therefore, it is unlikely that the price of sugar and creamer will increase solely based on the coffee crop failure, nor will people consume more coffee due to high prices. Also, there will not be a 'no change' scenario in the coffee market as the supply dynamics have been affected.
A small copy center uses 4 590-sheet boxes of copy paper a week. Experience suggests that usage can be well approximated by a normal distribution with a mean of 4 boxes per week and a standard deviation of .50 boxes per week. 2 weeks are required to fill an order for letterhead stationery. Ordering cost is $5, and annual holding cost is 37 cents per box. Determine the economic order quantity, assuming a 52-week year.
Answer: The Economic order quantity(EOQ) is 74 boxes.
Explanation:
Given weekly demand (d)= 4 boxes
Annual demand (D) = 4[tex]\times[/tex]52 = 208 boxes
Ordering cost S = $5
Holding cost H = $0.347
Standard deviation ([tex]\sigma[/tex]) = 0.50
Lead time (L) = 2 weeks
∴ Economic order quantity (EOQ) Q is as follow :
Q = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{2\times D \times S}{H} }[/tex]
Q = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{2\times 208 \times 5}{0.347} }[/tex]
Q = 77.42 or 74
The Economic order quantity(EOQ) is 74 boxes.
As a result of a thorough physical inventory, Horace Company determined that it had inventory worth $320,000 at December 31, 2015. This count did not take into consideration the following facts: Herschel Consignment currently has goods worth $47,000 on its sales floor that belong to Horace but are being sold on consignment by Herschel. The selling price of these goods is $75,000. Horace purchased $22,000 of goods that were shipped on December 27, FOB destination, that will be received by Horace on January 3. Determine the correct amount of inventory that Horace should report.a. $320,000.b. $367,000.c. $387,000.d. $340,000.
Answer:
The correct answer is option b) $367,000
Explanation:
Here for calculating the correct amount of inventory that Horace should report can be calculated through, by adding the inventory worth $320,000 at 31 December, 2015 with consignment given to Herschel worth $47,000, SO
Correct amount of inventory =
Amount of inventory on 31 December
+
Consignment given to Herschel
= $320,000 + $47,000
= $367,000
Here we are taking Herschel consignment in to account and that too at the historical purchase cost because Horace company has give the Herschel to sell the goods on his behalf but the transfer of ownership has not taken place here , the right to ownership here remains with the Horace and the amount at which they should be recorded is at purchase cost not selling cost.
We will also not include goods worth $ 22,000 in to the calculation because the Horace company has not received the goods physically yet, we will include those goods in to inventory on January 3 not before that.
The correct inventory amount for Horace to report is $367,000, taking into account goods on consignment and goods not yet received.
Explanation:The correct amount of inventory that Horace should report is $367,000.
In order to determine the correct amount of inventory, we need to consider the goods on consignment and the goods that were purchased but have not yet been received by Horace.
The goods on consignment with Herschel Consignment should be included as part of Horace's inventory, as they still belong to Horace. Therefore, we need to add the selling price of $75,000 to the inventory count. Additionally, the goods that were purchased but have not yet been received should also be included, so we need to add the purchase amount of $22,000 to the inventory count. Adding these amounts to the initial count of $320,000 gives us a correct inventory amount of $367,000.
Learn more about Inventory calculation here:https://brainly.com/question/31380783
#SPJ3
RadioWaves, Inc. is a manufacturer of weather radios. It has two departments: assembly and testing. In March 2018, the company incurred $800,000 on direct materials and $705,000 on conversion costs. Assume there was no beginning inventory of any kind on March 1, 2018. During March, 7,000 units were started into production and all 7,000 were completed by the end of the month. What is the approximate unit cost of an assembled radio at the end of March?
Answer:
Unit cost of an assembled radio = $215
Explanation:
Cost of direct material for the month = $800,000
Cost of conversion = $705,000
Total units produced = 7,000 units
Cost per unit of manufacturing will be total of both the costs divided by number of units produced.
Total costs = $800,000 + $705,000 = $1,505,000
Cost per unit = [tex]\frac{1,505,000}{7,000} = $215[/tex]
As there was no opening or closing WIP inventory all the costs incurred during the month will be considered.
Unit cost of an assembled radio = $215
Suppose we observe 300 boxes delivered incorrectly to the wrong addresses in a small city during a single day when a total of 100,000 boxes were delivered. What is the DPMO in this situation?
Answer:
DPMO 3,000
Explanation:
Defect per Millon Opportunities
[tex]1000000 \times \frac{sample \: defect}{sample \: size} = \: dpmo[/tex]
DPMO = 1,000,000 * 300/100,000 = 3,000
we divide the failure of the sample by the sample side and apply the ratio to 1,000,000 to get an expected failure per millon
On January 1, 2018, Nana Company paid $100,000 for 6,400 shares of Papa Company common stock. The ownership in Papa Company is 10%. Nana Company does not have significant influence over Papa Company. Papa reported net income of $60,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The fair value of the Papa stock on that date was $60 per share. What amount will be reported in the balance sheet of Nana Company for the investment in Papa at December 31, 2018?
Answer:
The $384,000 is the amount which will be reported in the balance sheet of Nana Company for the investment in Papa at December 31, 2018
Explanation:
Since in the given question, the Nana company does not have significant influence over Papa company, so the net income, retained earning, paid value would be considered in the calculation part.
The computation of investment reported in the balance sheet of Nana company is shown below:
= Number of shares × fair value per share
= 6,400 shares × $60
= $384,000
Thus, the $384,000 is the amount which will be reported in the balance sheet of Nana Company for the investment in Papa at December 31, 2018
An investment project has annual cash inflows of $4,400, $3,900, $5,100, and $4,300, for the next four years, respectively. The discount rate is 14 percent. a. What is the discounted payback period for these cash flows if the initial cost is $5,700? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) b. What is the discounted payback period for these cash flows if the initial cost is $7,800? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) c. What is the discounted payback period for these cash flows if the initial cost is $10,800? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
Answer:
Discounted payback period shall be as follows:
a. 1 year 7.36 months
b. 2 years 3.27 months
c. 3 years 2.9 months
Explanation:
a. Payback period in case of cash outflow = $5,700
For calculating the pay back period we shall firstly discount the cash flows to present value @14 %.
Year Cash Flow PV Factor PV of Cash Flow Cumulative
Cash Flow
0 - $5,700 1 - $5,700 -5,700
1 $4,400 0.877 $3,858.8 -$1,841.2
2 $3,900 0.770 $3,003 $1,161.8
Since the cumulative cash flows are positive in 2nd year payback period =
1 + [tex]\frac{1,841.2}{3,003} \times 12[/tex] = 1 year and 7.36 months
b. Payback period in case of cash outflow = $7,800
For calculating the pay back period we shall firstly discount the cash flows to present value @14 %.
Year Cash Flow PV Factor PV of Cash Flow Cumulative
Cash Flow
0 - $7,800 1 - $7,800 -7,800
1 $4,400 0.877 $3,858.8 -$3,941.2
2 $3,900 0.770 $3,003 -$938.2
3 $5,100 0.675 $3,442.5 $2,504.3
Since the cumulative cash flows are positive in 3rd year payback period =
2 + [tex]\frac{938.2}{3,442.5} \times 12[/tex] = 2 years and 3.27 months
b. Payback period in case of cash outflow = $10,800
For calculating the pay back period we shall firstly discount the cash flows to present value @14 %.
Year Cash Flow PV Factor PV of Cash Flow Cumulative
Cash Flow
0 - $10,800 1 - $10,800 -$10,800
1 $4,400 0.877 $3,858.8 -$6,941.2
2 $3,900 0.770 $3,003 -$3,938.2
3 $5,100 0.675 $3,442.5 -$495.7
4 $4,300 0.592 $2,545.6 $2,049.9
Since the cumulative cash flows are positive in 4th year payback period =
3 + [tex]\frac{495.7}{2,049.9} \times 12[/tex] = 3 years and 2.9 months
Final Answer
Discounted payback period shall be as follows:
a. 1 year 7.36 months
b. 2 years 3.27 months
c. 3 years 2.9 months
The discounted payback period is calculated by adding the discounted future cash inflows until they equal or surpass the initial investment. The exact duration cannot be determined without performing the calculations.
Explanation:The discounted payback period is a measure of how long it takes for the discounted future cash inflows to repay the initial investment or cost. The cash inflows are discounted using an interest rate (referred to as the discount rate), which here is 14 percent. We need to calculate the payback period for three different initial costs - $5,700, $7,800, $10,800.
It's calculated in the following step-by-step manner:
Calculate the present value of the cash inflows for each year using the formula: PV = CF / (1 + r)^n, where PV is the present value, CF is the cash inflow, r is the discount rate, and n is the year number.Calculate the cumulative discounted cash inflow for each year.Observe the year when the cumulative discounted cash inflow becomes equal to or greater than the initial investment. That's the discounted payback period.Unfortunately, without access to a calculator to compute the exact values, I can't provide specific numbers for the three parts of your question.
Learn more about Discounted Payback Period here:https://brainly.com/question/36333232
#SPJ3
Which of the following have the potential to increase the net present value of a proposed investment? I. Ability to immediately shut down a project should the project become unprofitable II. Ability to wait until the economy improves before making the investment III. Option to place the investment on hold until a more favorable discount rate becomes available IV. Option to increase production beyond that initially projected
Answer: The following have the potential to increase the net present value of a proposed investment:
I. Ability to immediately shut down a project should the project become unprofitable.
II. Ability to wait until the economy improves before making the investment.
III. Option to place the investment on hold until a more favorable discount rate becomes available.
IV. Option to increase production beyond that initially projected.
Explanation:
Net present value (NPV) in rudimentary terms can be defined as the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows proposed over a duration.
NPV is used in capital and investment planning to examine the gain of a projected investment.
Thus the above given factors are thoroughly responsible or have the potential to increase the NPV of a proposed investment.
All the listed options, which include the ability to shut down a project, delay the investment till economic conditions improve, place the investment on hold for a better discount rate, and increase production beyond initial projections, have the potential to increase the Net Present Value of an investment.
Explanation:The potential actions that could increase the net present value (NPV) of a proposed investment are as follows:
Ability to immediately shut down a project should the project become unprofitable. This reduces potential losses and thereby increases NPV.Ability to wait until the economy improves before making the investment. By delaying the investment, a company can take advantage of better economic conditions, resulting in increased profitability and thus a higher NPV. The option to place the investment on hold until a more favorable discount rate becomes available. A lower discount rate increases the NPV of future profits. The option to increase production beyond that initially projected. If the investment gives scope to increase output in response to high demand, profits will increase, leading to a higher NPV.Keep in mind that the Net Present Value is a measure of the profitability of an investment, which is calculated by subtracting the present value of the investment outflow from the present value of the investment inflow. A higher NPV indicates a more profitable investment.
Learn more about Net Present Value here:https://brainly.com/question/32720837
#SPJ3
The Engine Division provides engines for the Tractor Division of a company. The standard unit costs for the Engine Division are: Direct materials $700 Direct labor 1,300 Variable overhead 400 Fixed overhead 200 Market price per unit 3,200 The Engine Division has excess capacity. What is the best transfer price to avoid transfer price problems? a. $2,400 b. $900 c. $300 d. $1,350
Answer:
option (a) is correct, $ 2400
Explanation:
Given:
Direct materials cost = $ 700
Direct labour cost = $ 1300
Variable overhead = $ 400
Transfer price is relevant cost for Engine division
Now,
the relevant cost is variable cost
Also, variable cost is given as;
variable cost = Direct material + Direct labor + Variable overhead
on substituting the values in the above formula, we get
variable cost = $ 700 + $ 1,300 + $ 400
or
variable cost = $ 2400
Hence, option (a) is correct
Final answer:
The best transfer price to avoid transfer price problems, given the engine division's excess capacity, is the sum of the variable costs, which is $2,400. This ensures that the Engine Division covers its variable costs without considering any opportunity costs due to excess capacity.
Explanation:
The question asks for the best transfer price to avoid transfer price problems, given that the Engine Division has excess capacity when providing engines to the Tractor Division of a company. The cost information provided is direct materials, direct labor, variable overhead, and fixed overhead. The market price is also given.
To avoid transfer pricing problems especially when excess capacity exists, the transfer price should cover the variable costs and any opportunity cost the selling division might forego. In this case, since there is excess capacity, there is likely no opportunity cost, and the transfer price should at least cover the variable costs: direct materials, direct labor, and variable overhead.
The variable costs add up to $2,400 ($700 for direct materials, $1,300 for direct labor, and $400 for variable overhead). Therefore, the best transfer price in this scenario to avoid transfer pricing problems would be $2,400 (Option a).
Hammer Time Company sells hammers that it purchases at a cost of $5. Hammer Time sells the hammers for $15. Last year, it sold 12,000 hammers. The company estimates that it can sell 5,000 more hammers than last year if it decreases the selling price to $10 per hammer. What is the budgeted sales revenue if Hammer Time implements the decrease in selling price?
Answer:
The sales revenue would be 170,000 if Hammer Time implements the decrease in selling price.
This would generate a decrease of $10,000 in the sales revenue
Explanation:
Understanding the way sales revenue is generated:
[tex]Units Sold * Unit Price = $Sales Revenue[/tex]
If the selling price drops to $10
and units sold increase by 5,000
[tex](12,000 + 5,000) * ( 15 - 5 ) = 17,000 * 10 = 170,000[/tex]
Comparing with the previous year:
[tex]12,000 * 15 = 180,000[/tex]
This policy decrease the sales revenue which makes the business less profitable.
Final answer:
The budgeted sales revenue if the selling price decreases to $10 per hammer is $375,000
Explanation:
The budgeted sales revenue if Hammer Time implements the decrease in selling price is $375,000.
To calculate this, first determine the new estimated sales quantity (12,000 + 5,000 = 17,000 hammers). Then, multiply the new selling price of $10 per hammer by the new estimated sales quantity: $10 x 17,000 = $170,000. Thus, the budgeted sales revenue would be $170,000 x 2 (for both sales transactions per hammer) = $340,000. However, if the original selling price was maintained ($15 x 12,000 = $180,000), the total budgeted sales revenue would have been $180,000 x 2 = $360,000.