In criminal cases, the burden of proving a defendant's guilt is on the prosecution, and they must establish that fact beyond reasonable doubt. In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving his case by a preponderance of the evidence.
A criminal case is defined as it is a crime against society and if you are guilty. In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving his suit/case by a powerfulness of the information.
What is a criminal case?A criminal case is an authority or the people versus the suspect. Normally, it defines as a crime against the social group and if anyone is guilty then he/she have to pay his/her debt to society and that means the offender goes to jail.
In criminal cases, the burden of proving the guilt of the defendant is on the criminal prosecution, and they must establish that fact beyond an intelligent doubt.
Examples:
Murder, battle, theft, etc.
Therefore, the burden of proof in a criminal case will lie on the plaintiff.
Learn more about the criminal case, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8953549
A temporary committee created to study an issue and make a policy recommendation is called a
Answer:
Task Force
Explanation:
They usually are created to solve a particular problem or current issue. Which is why they are more temporary, than permanent.
Answer:
A temporary committee created to study an issue and make a policy recommendation is called a task force.
Which statement best explains why Article III of the Constitution gives Congress the ability to create lower courts inferior to the Supreme Court "from time to time”?
a.The framers of the Constitution believed that as the country grew, more courts would be needed to meet its needs.
b.The framers of the Constitution believed that as courts made unpopular decisions, they would need to be replaced.
c.The framers of the Constitution wanted to ensure that Congress always had more power than the courts.
d.The framers of the Constitution wanted to ensure that new courts were always being created so new judges could be appointed.
Option A is right answer.
Constitution which mentions Article III describes the conception of tribunals and the laws of how they would be operated.
It also deducted for the formulation of more under general tribunals. Through time, federal tribunals have been installed throughout the nation often in great towns within the states. There are now 94 community courts in the 50 countries making it more accessible for citizens to access a federal court. This ensures that a citizen can examine the federal government in court blocking cross-country range from being a stay in a court case. The Supreme Court is the definitive power in the national court system.
Answer:
A:The framers of the Constitution believed that as the country grew, more courts would be needed to meet its needs.
Explanation: took test :>
Why is the supremacy clause considered to be the root of federalism?
The supremacy clause of the u.S. Constitution states that
Answer:
The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that the Constitutions itself, the treaties adopted under its authority and the federal laws are the supreme law within the United States territory.
Explanation:
By the Supremacy Clause, all the laws under the ones cited before must not be against these. Like the state constitutions. If there is an incongruency between laws the one with higher rank prevails.
The Constitution is the higher supreme law so all the laws including the federals and the treatises must be done according to what it says. If not it would be declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
An example of this clause is the opinion in Marbury V. Madison in which the Supreme Court stated that Congress is not able to pass laws that went against what the Constitution said.
I hope this answer helps you.
The supremacy clause in the U.S. Constitution upholds national laws and proclaims the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. It establishes the principle of national supremacy and embodies the doctrine of implied powers for the federal government. It upholds the unity of the country under one constitution.
Explanation:The supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, a part of Article VI, indicates that the Constitution, laws created by Congress, and treaties established by the federal government are considered the 'supreme Law of the Land.' If a conflict arises between the states and the national government, the rule of the national government prevails.
This provision gives the national government supremacy over states; however, it is not intended to undermine the states. It simply confirms that a single body of laws governs the country. The clause does not restrict the states to operate only under federal government supervision, rather it aims to keep the country united under one constitution, regardless of variances in state laws.
The supremacy clause underlines in particular that all officials, regardless of whether they serve at a national or state level, are bound by the oath to uphold the Constitution. It exemplifies the principle of national supremacy, preventing states from interfering in the lawful activities of the national government and also demonstrates the doctrine of implied powers, granting Congress a significant array of discretionary powers to fulfill its constitutional roles.
Learn more about Supremacy Clause here:
https://brainly.com/question/27915892
#SPJ5
How many districts are there in the federal reserve system
Answer:
there are twelve (12) districts in the federal reserve system
Answer:
Etat-Unis, United state, U.S
Cases that arent resloved through plea bargaining or by a jury trial are decided by a judge in a /an? A.indictment b.grand jury c.arraignment d.bench trial
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The answer that apply for most countries, among which GB, Scotland, USA and French model legal system countries is D. Bench trials ( although respecting the ierarchy in different judicial systems, for different phases of a legal process, there may be more then one judge making a decision over a court case
Limbic system disorders are possible explanations for criminal behavior under_theries?a.classical b.psychoanalytic c.criminal anthropology .d biocriminiology
Explanation:
The criminal antropologist like Cesare Lombroso and even C. Beccaria considered that certain parameters of the brain and the way the head of a person is shaped implies a predisposition for commiting crime.
The Freudian theories implied that behaviour is undermined by subconscious type of programming
Limbic system disorders are associated with criminal behavior according to biocriminology theories. Research highlights the amygdala's role in emotional regulation, linking it to behavioral issues. Biocriminology examines genetic and neurobiological contributions to criminality.
Limbic system disorders are possible explanations for criminal behavior under theories related to biocriminology. The limbic system, which includes the amygdala and the hippocampus, is vital for emotional processing. Anomalies in this system have been linked with various behavioral issues, including tendencies towards crime.
Early biological theories, such as those proposed by Cesare Lombroso, suggested that criminal behavior was an inherent biological trait. Modern research focuses on the genetic and neurobiological underpinnings of behavior, examining how genetic predispositions and brain function contribute to criminality, which is a key aspect of biocriminology.
Research has indicated that the amygdala plays a significant role in emotion and behavior, influencing responses like fear and aggression. Lesions in the amygdala, for example, have been shown to alter animals' normal behavioral responses to threats, indicating its importance in emotional regulation.
Congress passed a law imposing penalties for displaying indecent material online where children could see it. If the u.S. Supreme court subsequently rules that the statute conflicts with the first amendment of the u.S. Constitution, the statute is void. True or false?
The answer is it's true.
Which of the following statements accurately describes the relationship between the principle of "separation of powers" and the Articles of Confederation?
a.Because the Articles of Confederation created a bicameral legislative branch that could make and enforce its laws, it clearly illustrates the principle of "separation of powers".
b.The Articles of Confederation created both a legislative branch and an executive branch, making this document a clear illustration of the principle of "separation of powers".
c.Because the Articles of Confederation created a central government that contained only a legislative branch, it does not reflect the principle of "separation of powers".
d.The Articles of Confederation created only a judicial branch that could interpret matters of law for the states, therefore it is a poor example of the principle of "separation of powers".
Answer:
c.Because the Articles of Confederation created a central government that contained only a legislative branch, it does not reflect the principle of "separation of powers".
In order to determine if the case she was hearing broke the law, Judge Jane referred to prior rulings on the same subject. In other words, the judge is relying on precedent to make her decision. True or False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Look at the current facts not outher ones not on this case
In order to determine if the case she was hearing broke the law, Judge Jane referred to prior rulings on the same subject. In other words, the judge is relying on precedent to make her decision.
The statement is false.
What's the doctrine of precedent mean?The doctrine of precedents makes the decisions of courts, generally binding on the Supreme Court in instances wherein comparable or identical queries of law are raised before the court docket. The notable value of the doctrine of precedents is that it offers reality.
The Fourth amendment paperwork is the basis of a “right to privacy,” the right to be left by myself, as Justice Louis Brandeis placed it. The entertainment of economic and personal privateness is fundamental to a loose and civil society.
Learn more about Supreme Court here: https://brainly.com/question/6111641
#SPJ2
How long does it take to foreclose on a house
Answer: 6 months for the foreclosure then it has to go to a sheriffs sale, then it has a 6 revision period. But this is in Michigan, the law varies in each state, you can look on your states website for the answer.
Explanation:
Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether Congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy?
a. Congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. Congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further... show more a.
Congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy.
b.Congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest.
c.Congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process.
d.Congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.
Answer:
a.Congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy.
Explanation:
The oversight that the congress has over bureaucracy depends a lot on its capacity and its willingless to actually do it, it alos depends on who´s got the majority on congress, but overall the congress has avery effective and efficient way of overseeing the bureaucracy of the United States if they decide to do it, with different hearins and audits on the different government boards.
Which of the following is a valid defense to a defamation claim?
a. The statement was true.
b. The person making the statement made it only to the plaintiff, not to any third parties.
c. The statement was only an opinion.
d. All of these answers.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The answer is D. all of these answers.
d. All of the answers are valid defense to defamation claim.
Explanation:Defamation is a false accusation of one person to damage the reputation of other person or party. It is the false statement of actual fact. A person or party making a defamatory statement can be a privileged or a normal person.
If he/she is qualified and privileged, he/she should prove that the defamation is intentional or ill-will. In either case, one must prove the defamation in a legal way. The major defenses to a defamation claim are declaring the truth, qualified or absolute privilege, accept that it was a statement of opinion, written consent about the defamation, and defamation is made against someone else or third party.
A subject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. How should the investigator proceed, with respect to the IRB, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence?
A. Do not report the adverse drug experience to the IRB since it is a common adverse experience.
B. Report the adverse drug experience to the IRB only if there are several other occurrences.
C. Report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report.
D. Report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the IRB's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the IRB
Answer:
d
Explanation:
it needs to be reported as soon as possible and protocols must be followed to be sure it is an adverse reaction
With respect to the IRB, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence, the investigator should proceed by D. Report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the IRB's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the IRB.
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a adminstrative body that is put on place to protect the welfare and rights of the human beings who take part in a research.
Based in the information given, the adverse drug experience should be reported in a timely manner, in keeping with the IRB's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the IRB.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/11916441