The circumference of the inner circle is 22 ft. The distance between the inner circle
and the outer circle is 3 ft. By how many feet is the circumference of outer circle
22
greater than the circumference of the inner circle? Use 7 for it.
ft greater than the circumference of the inner circle.
The circumference of outer circle is about
(Round to the nearest tenth as needed.)
hol hornemar​

Stephen's heart beats 68 times in one minute

Step-by-step explanation:

60 sec (one min) divided by 15 sec ( the unit of time we use to track the 17 heartbeats) = 4

4 times 17 =68

In Ebru’s deck of cards, the probabilities of choosing a 2 and choosing a spade are respectively 1/13 and 1/4. However, these events are not independent, so the probabilities impact each other. The statements (a), (b), (c), and (e) are not true, while (d) is true.

The deck of 52 cards contains 4 suits and each suit has 13 cards, meaning there are 4 cards of 2 and 13 spades in total. We can use these numbers to calculate the probabilities.

When it comes to P(A | B)=P(A) and P(B | A)=P(B), these would hold true if A and B were independent events, meaning the occurrence of one does not affect the probability of the other happening. However, these events are not independent. If Ebru picks a 2, the chances of her picking a spade change, and similarly whether she picks a spade affects the chances of her picking a 2.

So that means (a) and (b) are not true, while (c) is not true because events A and B do indeed influence each other, making (d) true. If A and B were independent, then (e) would be true as the probability of both events A and B happening would be multiplied. However, in this case, they influence each other so (e) is not true.

https://brainly.com/question/32595260

#SPJ12

From this analysis, the true statements are a, b, c, and e. The decision of a card being a 2 and the choice of a card being a spade are independent events. The outcomes are not dependent on each other.

From a standard deck of cards, we have 4 cards that are 2s (one in each of the four suits: hearts, clubs, diamonds, and spades) and 13 cards that are spades (including numbered 2-10, a jack, a queen, a king, and an ace). Therefore, the probability P(A) that Ebru selects a 2 is 4 out of 52 (or 1/13), and the probability P(B) that she selects a spade is 13 out of 52 (or 1/4).

a) P(A | B) refers to the probability that Ebru selects a 2 given that she has already chosen a spade. In this case, there is only one 2 among the 13 spades, so P(A | B) = 1/13 which is equal to P(A). Hence, statement a is true.

b) P(B | A) is the probability that Ebru selects a spade having already chosen a 2. There is one spade among the 4 twos, so P(B | A) = 1/4, which is equal to P(B).  Hence, statement b is true.

c) We can see that both P(A | B) = P(A) and P(B | A) = P(B). Therefore, events A and B are independent, making statement c true.

d) Because A and B are independent, statement d, which suggests that they are dependent, is false.

e) For independent events, P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B), which is (1/13) * (1/4), so statement e is true.

https://brainly.com/question/16837146

#SPJ12

Answer:

Semicircle of radius of 1.6803 meters

Rectangle of dimensions 3.3606m x 1.6803m

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the radius of the semicircle on the top=r  

Let the height of the rectangle =h  

Since the semicircle is on top of the window, the width of the rectangular portion =Diameter of the Semicircle =2r

The Perimeter of the Window

=Length of the three sides on the rectangular portion + circumference of the semicircle

[tex]=h+h+2r+\pi r=2h+2r+\pi r=12[/tex]

The area of the window is what we want to maximize.

Area of the Window=Area of Rectangle+Area of Semicircle

[tex]=2hr+\frac{\pi r^2}{2}[/tex]

We are trying to Maximize A subject to [tex]2h+2r+\pi r=12[/tex]

[tex]2h+2r+\pi r=12\\h=6-r-\frac{\pi r}{2}[/tex]

The first and second derivatives are,

Area, A(r)[tex]=2r(6-r-\frac{\pi r}{2})+\frac{\pi r^2}{2}}=12r-2r^2-\frac{\pi r^2}{2}[/tex]

Taking the first and second derivatives

[tex]A'\left( r \right) = 12 - r\left( {4 + \pi } \right)\\A''\left( r \right) = - 4 - \pi[/tex]

From the two derivatives above, we see that the only critical point  of r

[tex]A'\left( r \right) = 12 - r\left( {4 + \pi } \right)=0[/tex]

[tex]r = \frac{{12}}{{4 + \pi }} = 1.6803[/tex]

Since the second derivative is a negative constant, the maximum area must occur at this point.

[tex]h=6-1.6803-\frac{\pi X1.6803}{2}=1.6803[/tex]

So, for the maximum area the semicircle on top must have a radius of 1.6803 meters and the rectangle must have the dimensions 3.3606m x 1.6803m ( Recall, The other dimension of the window = 2r)

The problem is to maximize the area of a window consisting of a rectangle and a semi-circle on top, given a fixed perimeter of framing material, which is a high school level optimization problem in geometry and calculus.

The question addresses the problem of finding the dimensions of a window with the most amount of light passing through, given a fixed amount of framing material. This is a classic problem in mathematics involving optimization under constraints, specifically related to geometry and calculus.

Let the width of the rectangle be x meters, and its height be y meters. Since the top of the window is a semi-circle, its diameter is equal to the width of the rectangle, meaning the radius of the semi-circle is x/2 meters. The perimeter of the entire window consists of the two sides and the bottom of the rectangle, and the circumference of the semi-circle. The total length of framing material is 12 meters, hence:

2y + x + (π(x/2)/2) = 12

Since the area of rectangle A = x*y and the area of the semi-circle is (x/2)²)/2, we want to maximize the total area A = x*y + (x/2)²)/2.

Using calculus, one can differentiate the area with respect to x or y and set the derivative equal to zero to find the maximum value. Assuming the student knows basic differentiation and solving equations, they can arrive at the optimal dimensions to let in the most light.

Answer:

The value of t test statistics is -2.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a study was conducted to determine whether UH students sleep fewer than 8 hours.

The study was based on a sample of 100 students. The sample mean number of hours of sleep was 7 hours and the sample standard deviation was 5 hours.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean number of hours UH students sleep.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu \geq[/tex] 8 hours     {means that UH students sleep more than or equal to 8 hours}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] < 8 hours     {means that UH students sleep fewer than 8 hours}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviation;

                         T.S. =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean number of hours of sleep = 7 hours

             s = sample standard deviation = 5 hours

            n = sample of students = 100

So, test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{7-8}{\frac{5}{\sqrt{100} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_9_9[/tex]

                              =  -2

Hence, the value of t test statistics is -2.

Answer:

Country ​A = 84

Country​ B = 28

Country C = 18

Step-by-step explanation:

Country ​A, Country​ B, and Country C won a total of 130 medals;

A + B + C = 130 ......1

Country B won 10 more medals than Country C;

B = C + 10 .......2

Country A won 38 more medals than the total amount won by the other two;

A = B + C + 38 ........3

Substituting equation 3 to 1;

(B+C+38) + B+C = 130

2B + 2C + 38 = 130 .......4

Substituting equation 2 into 4;

2(C+10) + 2C + 38 = 130

4C + 58 = 130

4C = 130-58 = 72

C = 72/4 = 18

B = C + 10 = 18 + 10 = 28

A = B + C + 38 = 18 + 28 + 38 = 84

Country ​A = 84

Country​ B = 28

Country C = 18

Given:

The system of equations is [tex]y=-\frac{3}{2}x+12[/tex] and [tex]y=5x+28[/tex]

We need to determine the solution to the system of equations.

Solution:

The solution to the system of equations is the point of intersection of these two lines.

Let us solve the system of equations using substitution method.

Thus, we have;

[tex]5x+28=-\frac{3}{2}x+12[/tex]

Simplifying, we get;

[tex]\frac{13}{2}x+28=12[/tex]

       [tex]\frac{13}{2}x=-16[/tex]

       [tex]13x=-32[/tex]

          [tex]x=-2.462[/tex]

Thus, the value of x is -2.462

Substituting x = -2.462 in the equation [tex]y=5x+28[/tex], we get;

[tex]y=5(-2.462)+28[/tex]

[tex]y=-12.31+28[/tex]

[tex]y=15.69[/tex]

Thus, the value of y is 15.69.

Therefore, the solution to the system of the equations is (-2.462, 15.69)

Answer

equilateral

Step-by-step explanation:

rate and choose brainliest

The total distance covered is 6 m

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the total distance be '2d'

Total time = 1.25hrs

Downhill speed = 6 mphr

Uphill speed = 4 mphr

(d/6) +(d/4) = 1.25

(2d + 3d) /12 = 1.25

5d/12 = 1.25

d = 3m

So, 2d = 6 m

The total distance covered is 6 m

Answer: Stefan didn’t use only rigid transformations, so the figures are not congruent

Step-by-step explanation:

Stefan didn’t use only rigid transformations, so the figures are not congruent.

Two triangles are said to be congruent if their sides are equal in length, the angles are of equal measure, and they can be superimposed on each other.

In the given, Δ ABC and Δ ABD are not congruent triangles. if they are congruent then This means that the corresponding angles and corresponding sides in both the triangles are equal.

The following are the congruence theorems or the triangle congruence criteria that help to prove the congruence of triangles;

SSS (Side, Side, Side)

SAS (side, angle, side)

ASA (angle, side, angle)

AAS (angle, angle, side)

RHS (Right angle-Hypotenuse-Side or the Hypotenuse Leg theorem)

As, from the given cases the prediction of congruency of two triangles is incorrect. There is no error he made.

Hence, Stefan didn’t use only rigid transformations, so the figures are not congruent

Learn more about congruency here:

brainly.com/question/14011665

#SPJ2

Answer:

6.3972

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a normal distribution problem.

-We claim that most adults are more likely to erase their data;

[tex]p_o>0.5\\\\H_o:p>0.5[/tex]

-The test statistic for a stated hypothesis  for proportions is given by the formula:

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o(1-p_o}{n}}}[/tex]

Given the size of the random sample is 522 and that 62% of them are susceptible to erasing their data.

-Let [tex]\hat p[/tex] be the sample proportion. The value of the test statistic :

[tex]z=\frac{0.64-0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5\times 0.5}{522}}}\\\\=6.3972[/tex]

Hence, the test statistic is z=6.3972

Answer:

11

Step-by-step explanation:

8x - 3(-z - y)

Substitute

8(1) - 3(-(-2) - 3)

Simplify

8 - 3(-1)

Multiply

8 + 3

Add

11

Answer:

Here; 8x-3(-z-y) =

so your asking 8x-3(-z-y) right?

Let's simplify step-by-step.

8x−3(−z−y)

awnser again xD

=8x+3y+3z

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

What are you looking for as an answer?

Option B, pooled samples, is the correct answer, as it relies on the homogeneity of variance assumption for a t-test comparing two means.

Regarding inferences about the difference between two population means, when both populations are assumed to have equal standard deviations (or variances), the sampling design that uses a pooled sample variance is based on independent samples. This method pools the sample variances into a single, blended variance estimate when conducting a t-test for comparing two means.

The correct answer to the original question is B.​pooled samples. This approach uses the assumption that the population variances are equal, an assumption known as homogeneity of variance. The pooled variance is then used to calculate the test statistic which is crucial for the t-test to compare the means from the two populations accurately.

If the assumption of equal population variances is true, using pooled variance gives a more precise estimate of the population variance, which can lead to a more powerful statistical test. If the populations do not have equal variances, another test designed for unequal variances, like Welch's t-test, should be used instead.

the sampling design that uses a pooled sample variance in cases of equal population standard deviations is based on:pooled samples

The correct option is (B).

When making inferences about the difference between two population means, one common scenario is when the standard deviations of the two populations are equal. In such cases, the pooled sample variance approach is used.

Pooled sample variance involves combining the variances of the two samples into a single pooled estimate. This is done because when the standard deviations are equal, it's reasonable to assume that the underlying population variances are also equal.

The pooled sample variance approach is typically used in independent samples designs, where the samples are taken from two separate populations or groups. These samples are independent because the individuals in one sample are not related to the individuals in the other sample.

Therefore, the correct answer is B. pooled samples, as it accurately describes the sampling design used in cases of equal population standard deviations when making inferences about the difference between two population means.

To find the perimeter of the regular octagon, we use the distance formula to calculate the length of one side given the endpoints and then multiply that length by eight, as there are eight equal sides in a regular octagon.

The question revolves around finding the perimeter of a regular octagon given the coordinates of one of its sides. First, we must determine the length of the side using the distance formula between the two given endpoints (-2,-4) and (4,-6). The distance formula is √((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2), where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the coordinates of the endpoints. After calculating the length of one side, we multiply this by 8 (since an octagon has eight equal sides) to get the perimeter.

The calculation is as follows:

The perimeter of the octagon is 16√10 units.

Answer:

x = domain

y = range

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I understand the key where you represented what each of the letters represent but, there is no equation sorry I hope this helped if you would please give me a more specific equation if possible??

Answer: Its C, 9.1

Step-by-step explanation: Did it on usa prept :)

Answer:

2.7

Step-by-step explanation:

This can be modeled using exponential growth/decay.

A = P (1 + r)ⁿ

where A is the final amount,

P is the initial amount,

r is the rate of growth/decay,

and n is the number of cycles.

For half life problems, r = -½, and n = t / T, where t is time and T is the half life.

A = P (1 − ½)^(t/T)

A = P (½)^(t/T)

Given that P = 9, t = 10000, and T = 5730:

A = 9 (½)^(10000/5730)

A ≈ 2.7

There are approximately 2.7 mg of ¹⁴C left.

Answer:

The correct option is (c).

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Central Limit Theorem if we have a population with a known mean and standard deviation and appropriately huge random samples (n > 30) are selected from the population with replacement, then the distribution of the sample means will be approximately normally distributed.

Then, the mean of the distribution of sample means is given by, the population mean.

And the standard deviation of the distribution of sample means is given by,

[tex]SD_{\bar x}=\frac{SD}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

So, the most basic and main objective of the Central limit theorem is to approximate the sampling distribution of a statistic by the Normal distribution even when we do not known the distribution of the population.

Thus, the correct option is (c).

The Central Limit Theorem is crucial in statistics because it provides a powerful tool for dealing with data from various populations by allowing us to rely on the normal distribution for making statistical inferences, even when the underlying population is not normally distributed. This property makes it a cornerstone of statistical theory and practice.

The correct answer is: c) Because for a large sample size n, it says the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normal regardless of the shape of the population.

The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is a fundamental concept in statistics with widespread applications.

It is important for several reasons:

Approximation of the Sampling Distribution:

The CLT states that for a sufficiently large sample size (n), the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normally distributed, regardless of the shape of the population from which the samples are drawn.

This is crucial because it allows statisticians to make inferences about population parameters based on the normal distribution, which simplifies statistical analysis.

Widespread Applicability:

The CLT is not limited to specific populations or data types.

It holds true for a wide range of data distributions, making it a versatile tool in statistical analysis.

Whether the underlying population distribution is normal, uniform, exponential, or any other shape, the CLT assures us that the distribution of sample means will tend to be normal for sufficiently large samples.

Foundation for Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals:

Many statistical methods, including hypothesis testing and the construction of confidence intervals, rely on the assumption of a normal distribution.

The CLT's ability to transform non-normally distributed data into a normal sampling distribution is essential for these statistical techniques.

For similar question on Central Limit Theorem.

https://brainly.com/question/18403552

#SPJ6

Answer:

C. 40%

Step-by-step explanation:

Using set notations,

Check the attachment for the diagram.

Let the total fund shared by the town be 100% which will be our universal set.

Let X be proportion of households that own mutual funds but not individual

From the venn diagram,  

The total number of people that owned mutual fund M = (proportion of  households that owned both mutual fund and individual stock) +  (proportion of households that own mutual funds but not individual stocks)

If X is the proportion of households that own mutual funds but not individual stocks

The total number of people that owned mutual fund = (proportion of  households that owned both mutual fund and individual stock) +  X

X = (the total number of people that owned mutual fund)- (proportion of  households that owned both mutual fund and individual stock)

X = 60% - 20%

X = 40%

Final answer:

To calculate the proportion of households owning only mutual funds, subtract the percentage owning both mutual funds and individual stocks from the percentage owning mutual funds, giving us 40%. The answer is C) 40%.

Explanation:

The question provided falls under the category of probability and sets in mathematics. It involves understanding how to calculate the proportion of households that own mutual funds but not individual stocks when certain percentages are provided for mutual fund ownership, stock ownership, and those owning both. This is commonly known as a problem involving the use of Venn Diagrams or set theory.

Firstly, it is stated that 60% of households own mutual funds and 40% own individual stocks. Among them, 20% own both mutual funds and individual stocks. To find the proportion of households that own only mutual funds (and not individual stocks), we subtract the percentage that owns both from the percentage that owns mutual funds. Therefore:

Proportion owning only mutual funds = (Percentage owning mutual funds) - (Percentage owning both mutual funds and stocks)

This gives us:

Proportion owning only mutual funds = 60% - 20% = 40%

The correct answer is C) 40%.

Answer:

z1 = 7.71 + 0.02 i

z2 = 7.73 + 0.306 i

z3 = 7.78 + 0.59 i

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the roots you use:

[tex]z^{\frac{1}{n}}=r^{\frac{1}{n}}[cos(\frac{\theta+2\pi k}{n})+isin(\frac{\theta+2\pi k}{n})][/tex]     ( 1 )

n: the order of the roots

k: 0,1,2,...,n-1

First, you write z in polar notation:

[tex]z=re^{i\theta}\\\\r=\sqrt{(473)^2+(4)^2}=473.01\\\\\theta=tan^{-1}(\frac{4}{473})=0.48\°[/tex]

Thus, by using these values for the angle and r in the expression (1), you obtain:

[tex]k=0\\\\z_1=(473.01)^{1/3}[cos(\frac{0.48+2\pi(0)}{3})+isin(\frac{0.48+2\pi(0)}{3})]\\\\z_1=7.79(0.99+i2.79*10^{-3})=7.71+i0.02\\\\z_2=7.79[cos(\frac{0.48+2\pi(1)}{3})+isin(\frac{0.48+2\pi(1)}{3})]\\\\z_2=7.73+i0.306\\\\z_3=7.79[cos(\frac{0.48+2\pi(2)}{3})+isin(\frac{0.48+2\pi(2)}{3})]\\\\z_3=7.78+i0.59[/tex]

hence, from the previous results you obtain:

z1 = 7.71 + 0.02 i

z2 = 7.73 + 0.306 i

z3 = 7.78 + 0.59 i

I attached and image of the plot

Final answer:

The difference in surface areas of the two boxes is 3 square feet.

Explanation:

The difference in surface areas between two boxes is computed by first finding the surface area of each box and then subtracting the smaller surface area from the larger one.

Rectangular Prism:

For the rectangular prism with dimensions 3 ft by 4.5 ft by 2 ft, the surface area (SA) is calculated using the formula SA = 2lw + 2lh + 2wh.

The surface areas of the rectangular prism are:    

Total surface area of the rectangular prism = 27 ft² + 12 ft² + 18 ft² = 57 ft²

Cube:

For the cube with a side of 3 ft, the surface area is found using the formula SA = 6s².

Thus:

Total surface area of the cube = 6(3 ft × 3 ft) = 54 ft²

Difference in Surface Area:

Difference in surface areas = Surface area of the rectangular prism - Surface area of the cube = 57 ft² - 54 ft² = 3 ft².

Answer:

19 + x ≥ 38

Step-by-step explanation:

Margo must sell at least 19 more tubs of cookie dough to meet her goal for the student council fundraiser, represented by the inequality x ≥ 19

The question asks to find an inequality that represents the number of tubs of cookie dough Margo still needs to sell.

Margo needs to sell at least 38 tubs of cookie dough and has already sold 19, so we subtract the tubs sold from the total needed:

38 - 19 = 19

Now, let x represent the number of tubs Margo still needs to sell.

The inequality that best represents this situation is:

x ≥ 19

This inequality shows that Margo needs to sell at least 19 more tubs to meet her minimum goal for the fundraiser.

Answer:

See explaination

Step-by-step explanation:

Please kindly check attachment for the step by step solution of the given problem.

Final answer:

The hypothesis of the study is that there's a positive correlation between nose size and age, with age significantly influencing nose measurements. The strong significance level indicates a likely true relationship. This context involves genetics, evolutionary biology, and human anatomy, illustrating the complexity of evolutionary change.

Explanation:

The hypothesis being tested in the study is that there is a positive linear relationship between age and nose size. This study examines various measurements of the nose, including volume, surface area, height, and width, and assesses how these dimensions change with age. The significance level of p<0.001 suggests a very strong chance that the observed relationship is not due to random variation, but indeed reflects a true correlation between nose size and age.

Genetics and evolutionary biology play crucial roles in this context, with the Price equation outlining how certain traits might evolve over time even in the absence of natural selection. Importantly, reification can lead to misconceptions as it implies that there is a direct correspondence between a named entity, like 'nose genes', and physical traits.

An understanding of human anatomy, like the relationship between the nasal aperture and the overall size of the nose—exampled by the large noses of Neanderthals, reflects broader principles of evolutionary change and adaptation. This complex interplay of genetics, physical development, and evolutionary factors highlights the importance of incremental transformations and selection in shaping human features over time.

Answer:

=3(x^2 − 7)

Step by Step explanation:

3x^2 − 21

=3(x^2 − 7)

Answer:

=3(x^2 − 7)

Step-by-step explanation:

Final answer:

The approximate probability of winning 4 games in a row when each game has a 1/3 chance of winning is 1.23%.

(Option B)

Explanation:

To find the approximate probability of winning 4 games in a row, we need to multiply the probabilities of winning each game. Since the probability of winning each game is 1/3, we can calculate the overall probability as [tex](1/3)^4[/tex]. Using a calculator, this comes out to be approximately 0.0123 or 1.23%.

Multiplying the individual probabilities of winning each game, given as 1/3, results in the overall probability of winning 4 games in a row, expressed as [tex](1/3)^4[/tex]. Using a calculator, this evaluates to approximately 0.0123, or 1.23%, highlighting the cumulative nature of independent events.

Answer:

Its b (2,9)

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it on edge

The points which line on the graph as per the given function will be (2, 9). Hence, option B is correct.

In math, graph science is the theory of geometric structures called graphs that are used to represent pairwise different objects. Vertices—also known as nodes or points—that are joined by edges make form a network in this sense.

Undirected graphs, where edges connect two vertices equally, and focused therapy, where edges connect two vertices unevenly, are distinguished.

As per the given information in the question,

The given function is,

y = 3ˣ

In this issue, we have to form points (x₀, y₀). All the function's points need to be replaced by y = 3ˣ.

Replace x₀ with x and y₀ with y.

Only when the right and left sides of the equality are equal does the point belong to the function.

Now, let's check the options one by one.

(a) (1, 0)

y = 3ˣ

0 = 3¹

0 = 3, it is incorrect.

(b) (2, 9)

y = 3ˣ

9 = 3²

9 = 9, it is correct.

To know more about Graph:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ2

Answer:

1/60 probabiliity

Step-by-step explanation:

You have two independent events that you want to put together.

Let Pr. mean "probability"

Pr(5 from 10 cards and 2 on a dice ) = Pr(5 from 10 cards) * Pr( 2 on a dice)

Pr(5 from 10 cards and 2 on a dice ) =(1/10) * (1/6)

= 1/60

Pr(5 from 10 cards and 2 on a dice ) =0.0167

or 1.67% probability

The diameter of the hemisphere is 20.4 centimeters.

Here's the breakdown of the calculation:

Formula for hemisphere volume: The volume of a hemisphere is equal to two-thirds the volume of a full sphere with the same radius (r).

V_hemisphere = (2/3) * (4/3) * π * r^3

Substituting known values: We know the volume of the hemisphere (V_hemisphere) is 2233 cm^3. Plugging this into the equation:

2233 cm^3 = (2/3) * (4/3) * π * r^3

Solve for radius (r): Isolate r:

r^3 = (2233 cm^3 * 3 / 8 * π) ≈ 1181.36 cm^3

r ≈ 10.3 cm

Calculate diameter: Diameter is twice the radius:

diameter = 2 * radius ≈ 20.6 cm

Therefore, the diameter of the hemisphere is approximately 20.4 centimeters to the nearest tenth of a centimeter.