The code of Hammurabi was important to the development of modern democracy because it?

First one: Flat like a map

Scratching. They used all of them, but mostly scratching. So scratching should be your correct answer.

It's scratching please make me the brainless

Answer:

Albeit Odysseus didn't change very much throughout his travels; while getting back to Ithaca to reunite with Telemachus and Penelope in the end, during the supreme ordeal, he displays a significant improvement in some behaviors he had some challenges with before, such as prudence and patience.

He was not always prudent in all situations before; but it was explicit in the end, in the way the suitors were destroyed by him and Telemachus, showing much more self control and patience before taking action, qualities he upgraded, especially since that time he defeated the Cyclops, using less violence and being thoughtful, more clever and having more self control, relying more on his mind faculties.

Explanation:

Their connection is not difficult to understand.

The Declaration is a statement based on natural law. Natural law consists of fundamental principles of justice and right. Monotheists see natural law as deriving from the Creator. Polytheists see it as deriving from the supreme deity or deities. Atheists who believe in natural law, such as the late philosopher/novelist Ayn Rand, view it as a collection of rules inherent in the way the universe works.

Both were inspired by ideas popularized during the Enlightenment.

Answer:

The result of the Three-Fifths Compromise was more representation in Congress for southern states.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between the southern states and the northern states of the United States, reached in 1787 at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. It was determined that three out of every five of the slaves should be included in the census in the states, both for tax purposes and for seat allocation in the House of Representatives. This gave the Southern States one-third more representatives and presidential electors than if slaves were not to be counted.

The result of the Three-Fifths Compromise was: A. more representation in Congress for larger states.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a clause adopted by the American Constitutional Convention in 1787. It established how enslaved people would be considered for taxation and House of Representatives representation.

According to the compromise, while calculating a state's population for representation in the House of Representatives, each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person. In other words, out of every five slaves, only three would be included in the state's population.

Therefore the correct option is A.

Learn more about Three-Fifths Compromise here:https://brainly.com/question/882356

#SPJ6

Hi there!

Your Question; What is most significant about the empire of Ghana?

Good question, (from google btw) They built their capital city, Kumbi Saleh, right on the edge of the Sahara and the city quickly became the most important southern trade center of the Saharan trade routes. The kingdom was ruled by a king called the ghana.  Gradually, Ghana grew very rich, due in large part to the trans- Saharan trade.

Hope I helped, if I did, please mark me brainiest! Thank you. <3

I think what was more significant was that the king was called Ghana, but he grew up to be quite rich due to the Saharan trade.

Answer: self-determination

Explanation:

The principle of self-determination declares that people are free to determine their political status and to pursue their economic, social and cultural development. It is based on respect for the principle of equal rights and fair equality of opportunity.

Puerto Rico Cuba The Philippines What violent events affected its relationship with the US •Spanish-American-Cuban War -1989 Three uprising that led to US Occupation Philippine -American War 1899-1902 China Boxer Rebellion - 1899

The Mexican-American War drastically impaired the relationship between the United States and Latin American countries, leading to distrust and animosity that persisted for years. Other conflicts like the sinking of the USS Panay and the Spanish-American War also influenced the perception of the United States internationally and internally, raising concerns over imperialism.

The violent event that significantly affected the relationship between Latin American countries and the United States was the Mexican-American War. Mexico, as well as other Latin American nations, perceived the United States as having provoked the war through acts of American greed, which led to a legacy of bitterness and distrust that has endured over time. This event affected US foreign relations and also disrupted domestic political agreements over slavery in America, threatening the nation's stability. Moreover, the war incited 'Yankeephobia' throughout Latin America, fostering a deep suspicion of US intentions and policies.

Other historical events that impacted the United States' international relations include the sinking of the USS Panay by Japanese aircraft during the Second Sino-Japanese War, which led to shock and dismay in the US; the Spanish-American War, which marked the United States' emergence onto the global stage through a conflict initiated under the guise of liberating Cuba from Spanish rule; and the atrocities committed in the Philippines during the same war, which tarnished the United States' image as a benevolent liberator and raised questions domestically about American imperialism.

Galloway's purpose in writing the letter was to point out his solution to the problem of colonists resisting the imposition of taxes by the British government. It was the first impulse of what would later be known as the Galloway's Plan of Union, which consisted in creating a parliament of American colonists who would oversee the decisions the British parliament had for the new continent.

In the letter, Galloway recognized the burden of sustaining the colonies  as being a reasonable cause for the United Kingdom to tax colonists, but recognized the inability of the later to pay due to the trading restrictions set by the English.

He suggested that if colonists considered the impositions too heavy, they should refer to more rational methods than rioting to let the British understand that they couldn't pay the taxes, for example by sending American representatives to the British parliament.

Separation of church and state -  

The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Answer:

That ideal is that of Religious Liberty. It is stated in the First Ammendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

Explanation:

Liberty is the same as freedom.

In the First Ammendment, it is guaranteed to all US citizens that they are both free to believe and express their belief in any religion. It also assures that the Government cannot favour one religion over another, or non-religion over religion abiding citizens and practices.

Life for workers changed dramatically. The industrial revolution allowed the economy to jump start and gave people more free time to do what they wanted

Life for workers changed in various ways during the Industrial Revolution, including increased pay and social mobility, longer hours and dangerous conditions, and the loss of control over working conditions.

During the Industrial Revolution, life for workers underwent significant changes. The new industrialized workplaces offered higher pay and the opportunity for social mobility, compared to the often dirty and dangerous alternative jobs in peasant agriculture and small-village industry. However, workers had to work long hours, in difficult and hazardous conditions. They also lost control over their working conditions as factory owners regulated every aspect of their professional and personal lives.

https://brainly.com/question/15811029

#SPJ2

The answer is A because are all reasons why the Stamp Act had a bad reaction and ultimately ending up in a revolution.

Answer:

The correct answer is B. The fact that the tax proposed was much higher than that levied in Britain had the least to do with creating the adverse reaction to the Stamp Act in 1765.

Explanation:

The Stamp Act was adopted by the British authorities in 1765 in relation to the North American colonies. According to this document, all trade transactions, the sale of newspapers, books, brochures, playing cards and some other goods, as well as the execution of any civil documents were subject to a stamp duty in favor of the crown. A number of new fiscal measures were designed to reduce the UK public debt, which increased as a result of the Seven Years' War, replenish the empty treasury and compensate for the high costs necessary to protect the borders and colonists from raids by the Indians.

The new law caused massive protests and unrest in the North American colonies. Without their own representatives in parliament, the colonies were deprived of the opportunity to influence the structure and nature of taxation, the purpose and methodology of their collection and expenditure. On the streets of cities spontaneous anti-English demonstrations and rallies arose. In Boston, an excited crowd protested in front ot the vice governor's mansion.

Under the onslaught of the colonists, Great Britain retreated. The Stamp Act was never implemented. In 1766, it was annulled by the English parliament.

The Great Trek involved thousands of Boers migrating north to escape British rule in the Cape Colony, acquire more farming lands, and avoid conflicts with indigenous tribes like the Xhosa and the Khoisan. The British's scorched-earth policy during the Boer War also precipitated this movement.

The Great Trek was a migration of thousands of Boers, Dutch colonial settlers, moving northward in South Africa during the 1830s and 1840s. The primary reasons for this movement were to escape the British rule that was being imposed in the Cape Colony and to acquire more lands for their own farming needs.

The conflict with the indigenous people like the Xhosa and Khoisan also contributed to the Trek. The Dutch settlers faced two wars with the Xhosa and an uprising by Khoisan labourers. Tensions arose with these indigenous tribes as the Dutch settled on their hunting and grazing lands, which led to further conflicts.

Moreover, in an effort to weaken the Boers during the Boer War, the British adopted a scorched-earth policy, destroying Boer homes, farms, and livestock, which further directed the Boer's migration North. The Great Trek, therefore, was compelled by both a desire for independence and a necessity borne out of conflicts with other groups.

https://brainly.com/question/37024315

#SPJ11

Answer:

B is the answer.

Explanation:

East because Russia is east of Germany.

Hope this helps.

Good luck on ed.

Answer:

east

Explanation:

Germany is a country situated in Western Europe.

Russia, the largest country in the world, borders European and Asian countries and is bathed by the Pacific and Arctic oceans. It occupies part of Europe and Asia.

Since asia is to the east of Europe, Germans had to move east.

The Plateau society differed from Northwest coast society in various aspects.

Besides these differences there were some similarities between the two. Both were worshipers of nature and believed in spirits. The important economic activity of both these people were food gathering.

Answer:

The Plateau society contrasted from Northwest drift society in different viewpoints.  

Explanation:

The seaside society was extremely strict with its social classes while as there were no social classes in Plateau society.  The head of Coast society was inherited while as head of Plataea society was picked based on legitimacy and capacity.  Other than these distinctions there were a few similitude between the two. Both were admirers of nature and had faith in spirits. The vital financial movement of both these individuals were nourishment gathering.

The rise of mass production led to the integration of female workers into factories, most notably in textile manufacturing. These jobs were often necessary for financial survival rather than empowerment and came with lower wages than men's. Despite societal pressures to remain in domestic roles, the era did cultivate a new sense of financial independence and solidarity among working women.

The rise of mass production had a significant impact on working-class women during the Industrial Revolution. With the mechanization of industries, notably in textile manufacturing, a substantial shift occurred in the labor force, integrating a large number of female workers. Women, often young and sometimes immigrants or their daughters, were recruited to work in factories due to their perceived suitability for tasks in clothing and textile production. However, these employment opportunities were born more out of financial necessity than a push for gender equality or empowerment.

Although there was a surge in the number of working women, their salaries were often much lower than those of their male counterparts under the justification that they needed less, owing to the expectation of being under the care of a man. Moreover, many feared that extensive physical labor could harm women's health, and they faced societal pressures to maintain their domestic roles. Despite this, the period saw the emergence of the 'New Woman', who was better educated and sought greater independence.

Interestingly, working-class women's entrance into factory jobs afforded them the means to partake in consumer culture, purchasing items like clothing and household goods created by the very mass production processes they were a part of. Yet, by the end of the nineteenth century, as wages increased, it became a mark of pride among working-class men to support their families single-handedly, thereby reducing the prevalence of women and children in factories. Still, the collective experience of labor amongst working women fostered a sense of solidarity, and in some cases, a level of financial independence previously unfamiliar to them.

The statement is true :)

True

Henry VIII broke with the Catholic Church, because the CC (Catholic Church) said that it was unlawful for Henry to divorce and remarry. Because of this, Henry left the church so that he was able to divorce.

hope this helps

a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.

Answer:

A militia is an army created by non-professional soldiers who are citizens of a nation or a particular state. Usually, they have permission to act only in the State from which they are from.

Explanation:

The militias are used as an aid to support the professional armies in some cases or involve in defensive maneuvers. If they engage in combat with a regular army they will likely be defeated in a short time.

I hope this answer helps you.

There was a connection between the Puritan church and the local government. The Puritans left Great Britain so they would be able to practice their religious beliefs in the colonies without being persecuted. The Puritans generally were very strict in their religious observance.

There were many aspects of Puritanism that were sympathetic to the idea of democracy. It is important to remember that one of the main reasons for the Puritans to migrate to America was because of religious persecution. Therefore, they were conscious of the dangers of authority. This made them more open to the idea of freedom, such as freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Moreover, their Christian ideals indicated that God believed all men to be equal. This is an important concept at the heart of democracy.

They thought it was a good place to make money and it never went down for 8 years in a row so everyone thought there's no risk. They knew they weren't going to make a ton of money putting it into the bank. So in the stock market, you can take $5,000 and make it worth $10,000 in that time. So people thought they could get rich. However, there were too many small investors investing as well. They also borrowed money on leverage to invest in.

Answer:

He abolished feudalism and replaced feudal states with military districts run by loyal government officials. He gave the nobles' lands to peasants and forced noble families to move to the capital so he could monitor them.

Explanation:

Answer:

George Washington Plunkitt was an American politician from New York State. He served in both houses of the New York State Legislature and was a member of the Tammany Hall political machine.

Let me break it down for you in simpler terms:

- George Washington Plunkitt was a politician.

- He was from New York State.

- He served in both houses of the New York State Legislature.

- He was part of a political machine called Tammany Hall.

Explanation:

George Washington Plunkitt was a prominent American politician who lived from 1842 to 1924. He was associated with the Democratic Party and served as a member of the Tammany Hall political machine in New York City during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Plunkitt was a colorful figure known for his involvement in local politics and his ability to connect with and appeal to working-class voters. He represented the interests of his constituents, particularly those in the lower social and economic classes, by using his position in Tammany Hall to provide them with various benefits and favors.

Plunkitt famously described his approach to politics as "honest graft," where he used his political connections to benefit both himself and his constituents. He engaged in practices such as buying land before public projects were announced and then selling it at a higher price, profiting from insider knowledge.

While Plunkitt's actions may have been legal at the time, they were seen by many as ethically questionable. However, he defended his actions by arguing that he was simply using the opportunities available to him to improve the lives of his constituents.

Overall, George Washington Plunkitt was a controversial political figure known for his involvement in Tammany Hall and his use of "honest graft" to benefit himself and his constituents. His actions raise questions about the ethics of political practices and the balance between personal gain and public service.

George Washington Plunkitt was an influential American politician who was active in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. He was associated with the Tammany Hall political machine, which was a powerful political organization in New York City during that time.

Plunkitt served in both houses of the New York State Legislature, meaning he was a member of both the New York State Assembly and the New York State Senate. He used his political positions to accumulate wealth and power through various means, including insider trading and bribery.

Plunkitt was known for his pragmatic and unapologetic approach to politics. He famously coined the term "honest graft" to describe his method of using his political connections for personal gain while still benefiting his constituents. Plunkitt's views and actions embodied the patronage system that was prevalent in American politics during that era.

Overall, George Washington Plunkitt was a significant figure in New York politics, particularly associated with the Tammany Hall machine. His career serves as an example of the corruption and complexities of politics during the Gilded Age in America.

The Stamp Act was approved by the British in 1765 imposing taxes on all American colonists requiring them to pay taxes represented by a stamp on every piece of printed paper they used. Legal documents, licenses, newspapers, publications, etc. Colonists reacted with boycotts, riots and attacks to tax collectors.  Although the Stamp Act occurred years before the Declaration of Independence, it was a critical  issue that provoked the American Revolution.

If I'm not wrong, they were Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware.

Differences

- The pamphlet Common Sense was written by Thomas Paine whereas the Olive Branch petition was written primarily by John Dickinson.

- The pamphlet Common Sense was based around the idea that the American colonists should break away from Great Britain and become an independent country. The Olive Branch Petition was a document in which the colonists tried to reconcile with the British government.

- Common Sense  was used as a piece of propaganda to inspire colonists to break away from Great Britian. The Olive Branch Petition was used as a means to save the relationship between Great Britain and the colonies.

Similarity

- Both sources discussed the mistreatment of American colonists by the British government.

I actually feel it is the french because of the French Canadians. But Dutch is correct.