The national government is considering putting a tax on coal in your state. Coal companies and the miners are outraged. What would the responsibilities of the attorney general, the Natural Resources Department, and the governor be?

Answer is

Responses will vary. A sample response follows:

If an issue like this were to arise, many state executive offices and departments would spring into action. The governor’s job would be to represent the state in discussions or negotiations with the federal government. The attorney general’s responsibilities would include assembling a legal team to fight the tax and to represent the state’s case in federal court. Any interested department, like the Natural Resources Department, would be responsible for providing any advice and information to the attorney general and the governor.

The most obvious changes to a colonized country occurred in the country's Government.

The correct answer would be culture. Just got a 100 on my test.

The bloodiest battle of the war (Gettysburg) and the bloodiest single day of the war (Antietam) were both fought in this theater. The capitals of Washington, D.C., and Richmond were both attacked or besieged. ... The theater was bounded by the Appalachian Mountains to the west and the Atlantic Ocean to the east.

Soon after the creation of Oregon Territory in 1848, settlers north of the Columbia River began demanding a territory of their own. Congress acquiesced on February 8, 1853, with the creation of Washington Territory. ... On February 8, 1853, a federal bill was introduced to separate "Columbia Territory" from Oregon.Feb 26, 2004

The US government established Washington Territory in 1853 to provide governance for burgeoning settlements in the area, to manage resources and land efficiently during America's rapid westward expansion, and to facilitate the territory's path toward statehood.

The establishment of the Washington Territory in 1853 was a result of America's rapid westward expansion. Geographically, the young nation realized the potential for growth, particularly after the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which set the boundaries of the new country. Post the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, the US continued to acquire lands to the west, leading to disputes over unorganized territory.

The Survey of Northwest Territory and the subsequent ordinances provided for civil and religious liberty, prompting immediate colonization and setting the stage for new territories to become states. As the population in the Oregon Territory grew, it became necessary for the US government to establish a separate governing authority.

Hence, in order to provide governance to the settlements and to manage resources and lands more efficiently, Washington Territory was formed. This allowed the local governments to take care of their citizens under dual federalism.

In essence, the establishment of Washington Territory facilitated the support of burgeoning settlements, offered generous land grants to attract settlers, and represented a step toward eventual statehood. It marked America's territorial ambition and the management of its expansionist policies.

Written communication started with signs and symbols. It evolved into character-based alphabets representing the sounds of localized languages. Over time, people groups started to spread out and the languages collided. There had to be a way to communicate with each other. Translators and interpreters were the solution. In the early days of translation, a document needed to be translated by hand. The process typically involved a group of individuals who possessed bilingual abilities. They would spend months, even years, working word-for-word, phrase-by-phrase to bring documents to the world.

Hope this helps!

Language evolution and translation have been interlinked processes shaping communication across cultures for millennia. Continuous translation has led to the spread and adaptation of ideas, while also influencing language stabilization and change. The dynamic nature of linguistic evolution is underscored by the transformation of languages over time and the need for efforts to preserve endangered languages.

Evolution and Translation of Language

Language and its continuous evolution are fundamental to the way we communicate and understand our world. Over a span of approximately 3,500 years, translation has played a pivotal role in the dissemination of ideas and stories across diverse cultures. Artefacts and texts reveal the ingenuity with which translators have adapted linguistic content for different audiences, contributing to the evolution of language. Significant changes in human language can be observed through the transition of dialects after historical events such as the downfall of the Roman Empire, as well as the metamorphosis of languages over time, like the transition from Old English to Modern English.

Translation has not only facilitated cultural exchange but also contributed to the "freezing" of languages in their written form - a phenomenon observed when missionaries translated texts like the Christian Bible into local languages. Although this effort aided in preserving certain languages, it simultaneously led to the de-prioritization of language variations that were not captured in writing. Additionally, translation efforts like those of Jane Eyre, which has seen numerous adaptations in various formats and languages, illustrate the vastness and complexity of linguistic evolution and the impact of media on language change.

The natural progression of language, regardless of efforts to preserve or standardize it, is inevitable. Speakers today do not use language in the same way as their ancestors did centuries ago, in part due to natural linguistic evolution. Moreover, there are multiple reasons why languages change, including cultural exchange, technological advances and societal shifts. Efforts to preserve endangered languages are vital to maintaining linguistic diversity and a connection to cultural heritage.

Answer: Although at the early stages of the Roman Republic the aristocracy (patricians) dominated politics, as time passed, they started having the same political power as plebeians (patricians with no gens).

Even though they were both politically equal, patricians still had more social recognition and more wealth than plebeians, so they ended up buying control and influence over elected leaders.

Great Britain took control of the Suez Canal because Egypt could not pay its foreign debt. Egypt sold it to Great Britain.

Hope that helps!

Answer D

It was a shortcut to India.

i think the answers landforms but im not sure

Its C, the amendments were reconstructed adding three new ones. 13-15. All ensuring equality, abolishing slavery!

The Reconstruction Amendments outlawed slavery and granted citizenship to former slaves, ensuring equal rights for African Americans. The correct option is C.

The Reconstruction Amendments, which are the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, made significant changes to the Constitution. Option C is correct: the amendments outlawed slavery and granted citizenship to former slaves. These amendments were passed after the Civil War to ensure equal rights for African Americans and to promote their political participation. The amendments did not directly address freedom of speech, religion, or the press (option A), the electoral college (option B), or income tax (option D).

https://brainly.com/question/901229

#SPJ2

The correct answer is B) An explanation of the past through the telling of stories or what actually happened and why.

The phrase that gives accurate definitions of history is "An explanation of the past through the telling of stories or what actually happened and why.

History is very important. It teaches humans what happened in the past, why that happened, who were the actors in that historical event when it happened, the details of the event and the consequences. That is how humans learn and progress. Knowing the past allows humans not to repeat the mistakes that happened in the past in order to have a better future.

Your answer will be: Douglas supported the doctrine of popular sovereignty.

The northern Democrats supported Stephen A. Douglas for president in 1860 because of his condemnation of sectional parties, support for popular sovereignty, and stance on slavery in the territories.

The northern Democrats supported Stephen A. Douglas for president in the election of 1860 for several reasons. Firstly, Douglas condemned sectional parties, which appealed to the northern Democrats who sought to keep the nation united. Secondly, Douglas supported the doctrine of popular sovereignty, which allowed each state or territory to decide the slavery issue for themselves, aligning with the northern Democrats' belief in states' rights.

Lastly, Douglas wanted slavery to be allowed in all the territories, appealing to the southern Democrats and garnering their support.

https://brainly.com/question/32478294

#SPJ12

The Bill of Rights reflects a key Enlightenment idea because it limits what government can do and it does so in order to protect the rights of the people. According to Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, the purpose of government was to protect the basic human rights of its people.  Colonial Leaders used these ideas to justify independence.

The Roman Empire cast a vast shadow over the world of the New Testament. In the past couple of decades, biblical scholars and theologians have rediscovered this fact. The ripple effects in the twenty-first century of this fresh focus on how imperialism shaped the writings of the New Testament cannot be overstated. Something is emerging in American Christianity.  Many in the church were brought up to believe that the United States was given to us by divine right.  We are not only “proud to be American,” but we will sing out “God bless America, land that I love.”  Sitting in certain churches on Independence Day could leave one wondering if it is a worship service honoring the Christian God or the American flag. On the surface there is nothing wrong with liking a particular heritage or location, but what happens when you realize that the consumption of your so-called blessed nation may be fueling the oppression of many across the globe?  What happens when the things that you grew up taking for granted are now the very things that perpetuate suffering? Our world is one in which over a billion people lack access to clean water, where every seven seconds a child dies of hunger, where a billion people live on less than a dollar a day, where one hundred million children are denied basic education, where forty percent of people in our world lack basic sanitation, and where Americans spend more annually on trash bags than nearly half of the world does on all goods.[1] This is the reality of empire.  The empire creates the façade of peace and security, all the while perpetuating suffering for other parts of the world. The realization of many about the American empire has moved them to take a closer look at the historical context of the New Testament.  Numerous students of the Bible are discovering that the Roman Empire had a major influence on the characters and writers of the gospels, Acts, the epistles, and the Apocalypse. In the Gospel of Luke in particular, there are some obvious references to the Roman Empire and its interaction with Jesus.  Because both the authors of the New Testament and contemporary American Christians are faced with the task of living faithfully in the midst of empire, it will be our aim to examine the emergence of Roman Imperialism in the first century.  Then our attention will shift to examining two key texts in the third gospel (the birth narrative of Jesus, and the question of tribute to Caesar) as they relate to the Lukan view of empire.

Answer:    Through their actions they contributed to fulfill the prophecy of Christ's coming.

Explanation:  When the arrival of the Lord Jesus Christ comes, according to Christian terminology, it is thought of his first arrival, that is, his birth in Bethlehem and the preaching and healing the sick, in general, his work for which he came. His first arrival was when Israel and Judah were under the authority of Rome, an integral part of the Roman Empire. Also, according to the Christian belief, the coming of Christ, that is, the birth, life, and work on earth and death, are prophesied by many prophets of the Old Testament. According to these prophecies, Christ had to be born in Bethlehem not far from Jerusalem. As his parents lived in the distant Galilee, it was necessary  something to happen which would fulfill the Old Testament prophecy. Thus, the Roman authorities are completely unaware of the significance of what will happen, they have ordered a population census. According to Jewish laws, the family originates from the place where the wife originated. Thus St. Mary and Joseph went on a journey to Bethlehem where she was originally, to enrol in the population census. As Mary was in a blessed state, she, as a result of the order of the Roman authorities, went to Bethlehem together with Joseph, and there she gave a birth to her son, Jesus Christ. Due to the great migration of people these days due to the census, all guest houses were full, so St. Mary and Joseph did not find the place, although Mary was in pain just before the birth. Thus Mary gave birth to Christ in the Bethlehem cave, just as it was foretold in the Old Testament. In those years, the Roman authorities unconsciously made many things that contributed to fulfill the prophecy concerning the life of the dead of Christ. For example, according to Roman laws, he was accused of being a criminal, and crucified, which was the Roman way of death, and was crucified among two other criminals, just as it is foretold in the Old Testament.

My opinion, when it comes to the coming of Christ, should take into account the eschatological character of a suitable environment and setting for his coming. Often, according to the Christian belief in God Promise, things happen in a way that is not predictable, and often by those who are not aware of their actions, and in fact contribute to this suitable setting, even if they were enemies.

Answer:    B. The right to abolish this government

Explanation:  The Declaration of Independence is inspired and drawn up directly on the basis of the Enlightenment. According to the Enlightenment Ideas on the Defence and Protection of Human Natural Rights, it is the government that must ensure that these rights are enforced on the basis of a social agreement. If the government does not work to secure and enforce the natural rights of its citizens, those same citizens have the right to replace such a government with another that will respect the social agreement.

The United States presidential election of 1896 was the 28th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 3, 1896. Former Governor William McKinley, the Republican candidate, defeated Democrat William Jennings Bryan.

My thought is because the government/politics and religion at the time really hated each other and each wanted their own power

Answer:

The church was more organized

Explanation:

That’s the answer

The Articles of confederation was weak in that it had no power to tax, it couldnot enforce the laws in the constitution and couldn't maintain an army.In this case, the central government couldn't accoplish anything because it had no authority as all powers were placed on the states.

The Shays rebellion demostrated to the governement the need for a strong central government, one that could stand firm on basis of its laws and the constitution.This was achieved through the first revolution under the new government that led to the formation of a central government with strong powers and control.

In addition to that, the articles of confederation was weak because it prohibited the collection of direct taxes on income and property yet these taxes were necessary to facilitate the payment of war debts and to enable the country have a working economy.Shays rebellion exposed these weaknessess fro correction.

Shays' Rebellion was a direct result of the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation. The inability of the national government to raise an army for defense, manage a consistent financial system, and enforce laws showcased the inefficacy of the Articles, leading to a demand for a stronger federal framework. This widespread concern among the states catalyzed discussions that eventually resulted in the Constitutional Convention and the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government lacked the power to maintain economic stability and social order, as evidenced by the widespread unrest during Shays' Rebellion. The event highlighted major issues, such as the national government's inability to manage finances, the different economic policies of states causing trade conflicts, and an ineffective response to civil unrest. This led to the realization that the Articles of Confederation were insufficient to govern the nation, prompting the need for a stronger centralized government and eventually the development of the U.S. Constitution to replace the Articles and provide greater stability and federal authority in the United States.

Answer

Women were granted their political right to vote.

Explanation

The 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteed women their right to vote. It was passed by the congress and sent to the states for ratification. This success was as a result of the women suffrage movement that was created in the mid 19th century by women who were political active in their activities in the temperance and abolitionist movements. This political power was granted for the first time after 72 years of determination by American suffragist

As a result of 19th amendment, women were given the right to have their political vote.  

The 19th Amendment by the side of United States Constitution attend the women with the legal right to have their own political vote. It was passed from the support of congress. This power of political right was granted for the very first time after 72 years of determination by American suffragist.

Mecca is faced during prayer because it is where Kabbah is located. Muslims visit their during their Hajj migration, it is also where the prophet Muhammad was born.

Hope this helps!  :)

the correct answer is a, land claims made by certain states on the western territories

The answer to this question is "Land claims made by certain states on the western territories". Hope this helped!

Answer

This is a bad belief because when stiff controls are put on goods that offer competition with U.S trades, many problems will occur such as hurting of the U.S exports.

Explanation

When tariffs are placed on imports, tariffs will have to be placed on export too. This will result into hurting citizens in the long-run. For example, in the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 where president Hoover raised protective tariffs on imports so as to protect American business, the process backfired a led to more depression because other countries also increased tariffs with affected U.S exports.

The answer is true i took the test

Answer:

The answer is true it even says in the book that indians were as different from europeans as chinese were to pakistan's. hope this helps!

First of all, Compassion. What we are seein right now is indifference. Modern societies are self-centered. They have lost the inner-human capacity of understanding other people. People are spending more time with his technological devices than with family or loved ones. Yes, for everything technology help us, something is lost.

It seems that people is not surprising anymore. They barely watch the news. When they do so, it seems like everything is normal. The War in the Middle East...indifference. Immigrants dying in the border of Germany...indifference. People get killed by a disastrous hurricane...indifference.

Respect is another one. Most of the times humanity forgets that we are not the only ones in this planet. There are millions of people with different ideas and ideologies. They have their right to be correct, as we do. If we do not respect each other, then conflict arises. Just look to what happens in government issues or political parties.

And finally, tolerance. Although my ideas are on the opposite side of another person in the office or in the family, humans should show tolerance to understand the other people circumstances and reach a solution. Media news is full of conflicts that could have been resolved if someone has shown some tolerance.

It is John Locke's idea because he believed in human rights being protected by the government.

The majority of settlers in New England followed Protestant Christianity, particularly the Puritan and Pilgrim denominations.

Puritan refers to a religious movement that emerged in England during the 16th and 17th centuries. Puritans were a group of English Protestants who sought to purify the Church of England from perceived Catholic influences.

In search of religious freedom and a more pious way of life, many Puritans migrated to New England during the 17th century. They held strict moral and religious beliefs, emphasizing individual piety, predestination, and the authority of the Bible.

The Puritans played a significant role in shaping the cultural and religious landscape of early New England colonies.

Learn more about Puritan here:

https://brainly.com/question/29773668

#SPJ6