Answer:
a) y = 4e^(0.06t)
b) 0.06
c) 11.55 hours
d) 6.9 million
Step-by-step explanation:
When the growth rate (millions per hour) is proportional to the number (millions), the relationship is exponential. The growth rate is the constant of proportionality.
a) Formula for y(t):
y = 4e^(0.06t)
__
b) The growth constant is 0.06, the multiplier of t in the exponential function. It is the constant of proportionality in the given differential equation:
y' = 0.06y.
__
c) The doubling time is found from ...
2 = e^(0.06t) . . . the multiplying factor is 2 to double the original number
ln(2) = 0.06t . . . . taking natural logs
ln(2)/0.06 = t ≈ 11.55 h . . . . doubling time
__
d) Put t=9 into the formula from part (a). After 9 hours, there will be ...
y(9) = 4e^(0.06·9) ≈ 6.9 . . . . million bacteria present
Answer:
y = 4e^(0.06t).
Step-by-step explanation:
dy/dt = 0.06y
Solving:
dy = 0.06y dt
dy/y = 0.06dt
Integrating both sides:
ln y = 0.06t + C
y = e^(0.06t + C)
y = Ae^(0.06t) where A is a constant.
At t = 0 , y = 4 million so
y = 4 = Ae^0 = A
So the formula is
y = 4e^(0.06t).
The Eco Pulse survey from the marketing communications firm Shelton Group asked individuals to indicate things they do that make them feel guilty (Los Angeles Times, August 15, 2012). Based on the survey results, there is a .39 probability that a randomly selected person will feel guilty about wasting food and a .27 probability that a randomly selected person will feel guilty about leaving lights on when not in a room. Moreover, there is a .12 probability that a randomly selected person will feel guilty for both of these reasons. a. What is the probability that a randomly selected person will feel guilty for either wasting food or leaving lights on when not in a room (to 2 decimals)? b. What is the probability that a randomly selected person will not feel guilty for either of these reasons (to 2 decimals)?
Answer:
a) There is a probability of 42% that the person will feel guilty for only one of those things.
b)There is a probability of 46% that a randomly selected person will not feel guilty for either of these reasons
Step-by-step explanation:
This probability problem can be solved by building a Venn like diagram for each probability.
I say that we have two sets:
-Set A, for those people that will feel guilty about wasting food.
-Set B, for those people that will feel guilty about leaving lights on when not in a room.
The most important information is that there is a .12 probability that a randomly selected person will feel guilty for both of these reasons. It means that [tex]P(A \cap B) = .12.[/tex]
The problem also states that there is a .39 probability that a randomly selected person will feel guilty about wasting food. It means that P(A) = 0.39. The probability of a person feeling guilty for only wasting food is PO(A) = .39-.12 = .27.
Also, there is a .27 probability that a randomly selected person will feel guilty about leaving lights on when not in a room. So, the probability of a person feeling guilty for only leaving the lights on is PO(B) = 0.27-0.12 = 0.15.
a) What is the probability that a randomly selected person will feel guilty for either wasting food or leaving lights on when not in a room?
This is the probability that the person feels guilt for only one of those things, so:
P = PO(A) + PO(B) = 0.27 + 0.15 = 0.42 = 42%
b) What is the probability that a randomly selected person will not feel guilty for either of these reasons
The sum of all the probabilities is always 1. In this problem, we have the following probabilies
- The person will not feel guilty for either of these reasons: P
- The person will feel guilty for only one of those things: PO(A) + PO(B) = 0.42
- The person will feel guilty for both reasons: PB = 0.12
So
`P + 0.42 + 0.12 = 1
P = 1-0.54
P = 0.46
There is a probability of 46% that a randomly selected person will not feel guilty for either of these reasons
Solve. X1 – 3x2 + 4x3 = -4 3xı – 7x2 + 7x3 = -8 –4x1 + 6x2 – x3 = 7
Answer:
There is no solution for this system
Step-by-step explanation:
I am going to solve this system by the Gauss-Jordan elimination method.
The Gauss-Jordan elimination method is done by transforming the system's augmented matrix into reduced row-echelon form by means of row operations.
We have the following system:
[tex]2x_{1} - x_{2} + 3x_{3} = -10[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} - 2x_{2} + x_{3} = -3[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} - 5x_{2} + 2x_{3} = -7[/tex]
This system has the following augmented matrix:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&-3&4|-4\\3&-7&7|-8\\-4&6&-1|7\end{array}\right][/tex]
We start reducing the first row. So:
[tex]L2 = L2 - 3L1[/tex]
[tex]L3 = L3 + 4L1[/tex]
Now the matrix is:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&-3&4|-4\\0&2&-5|4\\0&-6&15|-9\end{array}\right][/tex]
We divide the second line by 2:
[tex]L2 = \frac{L2}{2}[/tex]
And we have the following matrix:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&-3&4|-4\\0&1&\frac{-5}{2}|2\\0&-6&15|-9\end{array}\right][/tex]
Now we do:
[tex]L3 = L3 + 6L2[/tex]
So we have
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&-3&4|-4\\0&1&\frac{-5}{2}|2\\0&0&0|3\end{array}\right][/tex]
This reduced matrix means that we have:
[tex]0x_{3} = 3[/tex]
Which is not possible
There is no solution for this system
Al purchases a speedboat costing $24,500. State taxes are 5.5% and federal excise tax is 13%. What is the total purchase price? (Round your answer to the nearest cent if necessary)
Answer: The total purchase price is $ 29,032
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, to solve this problem you have to solve the percentages of each taxes first.
So :
state taxes =$24,500 × 5.5% = $1,347.5federal tax = $24,500 × 13% = $3,185The next step is adding the taxes results to the speedboat cost.
so:
speedboat = $24,500
speedboat + taxes = $24,500 + $1,347.5 +$3,185 = $29,032
The total purchse price for the speedboat is $29,032.
pls tell me the
domain
range
and if its a function or not thx
Answer:
both domain and range are {-4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}
it IS a function
Step-by-step explanation:
The domain is the list of x-values of the plotted points. It is all the integers from -4 to +4, inclusive.
The range is the list of y-values of the plotted points. It is all the integers from -4 to +4, inclusive. (domain and range are the same for this function)
No x-value has more than one y-value associated with it, so this relation IS A FUNCTION.
Prove: If n is a positiveinteger and n2 is
divisible by 3, then n is divisible by3.
Answer:
If [tex]n^2[/tex] is divisible by 3, the n is also divisible by 3.
Step-by-step explanation:
We will prove this with the help of contrapositive that is we prove that if n is not divisible by 3, then, [tex]n^2[/tex] is not divisible by 3.
Let n not be divisible by 3. Then [tex]\frac{n}{3}[/tex] can be written in the form of fraction [tex]\frac{x}{y}[/tex], where x and y are co-prime to each other or in other words the fraction is in lowest form.
Now, squaring
[tex]\frac{n^2}{9} = \frac{x^2}{y^2}[/tex]
Thus,
[tex]n^2 = \frac{9x^2}{y^2}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{n^2}{3} = \frac{3x^2}{y^2}[/tex]
It can be clearly seen that the fraction [tex]\frac{3x^2}{y^2}[/tex] is in lowest form.
Hence, [tex]n^2[/tex] is not divisible by 3.
Thus, by contrapositivity if [tex]n^2[/tex] is divisible by 3, the n is also divisible by 3.
Is the following relation a function?
Yes
NO
Answer: The relation is a function.
Step-by-step explanation: In this situation, we are given a relation in the form of a graph and we are asked if it represents a function. In this situation, we would you something called the vertical line test. In other words, if we can draw a vertical line that passes through more than one point on the graph, then the relation is not a function. Notice that in this problem, it's impossible to draw a vertical line that passes through more than one point on the graph so the relation is a function.
Therefore, this relation must be a function.
1) Solve the word problem for the portion, rate, or base.
A quality control process finds 46.8 defects for every 7,800 units of production. What percent of the production is defective?
2) Solve the word problem for the portion, rate, or base.
A medical insurance policy requires Ana to pay the first $100 of her hospital expense. The insurance company will then pay 90% of the remaining expense. Ana is expecting a short surgical stay in the hospital, for which she estimates the total bill to be about $4,800.
How much (in $) of the total bill will Ana owe?
Answer:
1) 0.6% of the production is defective.
2) Ana will owe $570.
Step-by-step explanation:
Both questions here are percentage problems
Percentage problems can be explained as a rule of three problem
In a rule of three problem, the first step is identifying the measures and how they are related, if their relationship is direct of inverse.
When the relationship between the measures is direct, as the value of one measure increases, the value of the other measure is going to increase too. In this case, the rule of three is a cross multiplication.
When the relationship between the measures is inverse, as the value of one measure increases, the value of the other measure will decrease. In this case, the rule of three is a line multiplication.
Percentage problems have a direct relationship between the measures.
1) The problem states that a quality control process finds 46.8 defects for every 7,800 units of production. And asks what percent of the production is defective? We have to answers how many defects are there for 100 units of production. So:
46.8 defects - 7,800 units
x defects - 100 units
7,800x = 4680
[tex]x = \frac{4680}{7800}[/tex]
x = 0.6
0.6% of the production is defective.
2) The problem states that the medical insurance policy requires Ana to pay the first $100 of her hospital expense. The insurance company will then pay 90% of the remaining expense. The total bill is expected to be about $4,800.
Ana has to pay:
P = P1 + P2
-P1 :The first $100
-P2: 10% of the remaining expense. The remaining expense is $4,800-$100 = $4,700. Ana has to pay 10% of this. So
4700 - 100%
P2 - 10%
100P2 = 47000
[tex]P2 = \frac{47000}{100}[/tex]
P2 = $470
Ana will owe P = P1 + P2 = $100 + $470 = $570.
To find the percentage of defective units in the production, set up a ratio and calculate the percentage. Approximate 0.6% of the production is defective. To find how much Ana will owe of the total bill, subtract $100 from the total bill and calculate 10% of the remaining expense. Ana will owe $470 of the total bill.
Explanation:To find the percent of the production that is defective, we need to find the ratio of the number of defective units to the total number of units produced. In this case, we have 46.8 defects for every 7,800 units of production. So, we can set up the ratio as:
Defective Units / Total Units = 46.8 / 7,800
To find the percentage, we can multiply the ratio by 100:
Percentage of Defective Units = (46.8 / 7,800) * 100
Now, calculate the value of the ratio and simplify to find the percentage:
Percentage of Defective Units = 0.006 * 100 = 0.6%
Therefore, approximately 0.6% of the production is defective.
For the second question, to find how much of the total bill Ana will owe, we need to calculate the 10% of the remaining expense after she pays the first $100. First, subtract $100 from the total bill:
Remaining Expense = $4,800 - $100 = $4,700
Next, calculate 10% of the remaining expense:
Amount Ana will owe = 10% of $4,700 = ($4,700 * 10) / 100 = $470
Therefore, Ana will owe $470 of the total bill.
A pile of newspapers in Ms McGrath's art class was 17 3/4 inches high .Each Consecutive week,for the next 5 weeks,the height of the pile of newspapers increased by 8 7/12inches,What was the height ,in inches,of the pile after 3 weeks?
Final answer:
The height of the pile after 3 weeks is 43 181/192 inches.
Explanation:
To find the height of the pile after 3 weeks, we need to add the increase in height for each week. The initial height of the pile is 17 3/4 inches. For each week, the height increases by 8 7/12 inches.
So after 1 week, the height is (17 3/4 + 8 7/12) inches.
After 2 weeks, the height is [(17 3/4 + 8 7/12) + 8 7/12] inches.
And after 3 weeks, the height is [((17 3/4 + 8 7/12) + 8 7/12) + 8 7/12] inches.
Let's calculate:
After 1 week: 17 3/4 + 8 7/12 = 26 43/48 inchesAfter 2 weeks: 26 43/48 + 8 7/12 = 34 89/96 inchesAfter 3 weeks: 34 89/96 + 8 7/12 = 43 181/192 inchesSo, after 3 weeks, the height of the pile of newspapers is 43 181/192 inches.
In what proportion should 10% ethanol be mixed with 65% ethanol to obtain 50% ethanol?
Answer:
3 : 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x quantity of 10% ethanol is mixed with y quantity of 65% ethanol to obtain 50% ethanol mixture,
Thus, the total quantity of resultant mixture = x + y
Also, ethanol in 10% ethanol mixture + ethanol in 65% ethanol mixture = ethanol in resultant mixture,
⇒ 10% of x + 65% of y = 50% of (x+y)
[tex]\implies \frac{10x}{100}+\frac{65y}{100}=\frac{50(x+y)}{100}[/tex]
⇒ 10x + 65y = 50(x+y)
⇒ 10x + 65y = 50x+50y
⇒ 10x - 50x = 50y - 65y
⇒ -40x = -15y
[tex]\implies \frac{x}{y}=\frac{15}{40}=\frac{3}{8}[/tex]
A certain test preparation course is designed to help students improve their scores on the LSAT exam. A mock exam is given at the beginning and end of the course to determine the effectiveness of the course. The following measurements are the net change in 6 students' scores on the exam after completing the course:23,18,23,12,13,23Using these data, construct a 80% confidence interval for the average net change in a student's score after completing the course. Assume the population is approximately normal.
We are 80% confident that the average net change in a student's score after completing the course lies between 7.88 and 21.12 points.
Explanation:Here's how to construct the 80% confidence interval:
1. Calculate the sample mean and standard deviation:
Sample mean (xbar) = (23 + 18 + 23 + 12 + 13 + 23) / 6 = 18.33 points
Sample standard deviation (s) = √[(23 - 18.33)^2 + (18 - 18.33)^2 + ... + (23 - 18.33)^2] / (6 - 1) ≈ 5.38 points
2. Find the critical value for a 80% confidence interval:
For a two-tailed 80% confidence interval with 5 degrees of freedom (n-1), the critical value from the t-distribution table is approximately 1.942.
3. Calculate the margin of error:
Margin of error (ME) = critical value * standard deviation / √n
ME = 1.942 * 5.38 / √6 ≈ 4.49 points
4. Construct the confidence interval:
Lower limit = sample mean - margin of error = 18.33 - 4.49 ≈ 13.84 points
Upper limit = sample mean + margin of error = 18.33 + 4.49 ≈ 22.82 points
Therefore, we can be 80% confident that the true average net change in a student's score after completing the course falls within the range of 13.84 to 22.82 points, or rounded to the nearest whole number, 7.88 to 21.12 points.
Note: This calculation assumes the population is approximately normal. If there is reason to believe the population is not normal, a different method like bootstrapping may be more appropriate.
The Cabernet Cafe sold eight times as much Cabernet Sauvignon as Zinfandel. How many bottles of Cabernet Sauvignon were sold if the cafe sold 5 bottles of Zinfindel? This class is Food and Beverage Cost
Answer:
40 bottles
Step-by-step explanation:
In the problem it is said that there were sold eigth times as much Cabernet Sauvignon as Zinfandel, this menas that if for example the cafe sold 1 bottle of zinfandel it would be 8 bottles of Cabernet, so we have to multiply the number of bottles sold fon Zinfandel by 8, as there were 5 bottles of sauvingon sold we have to multiply
8x5=40 bottles.
The Cabernet Cafe sold 40 bottles of Cabernet Sauvignon, given that it sold 8 times as many as the 5 bottles of Zinfandel.
Explanation:The question involves a simple proportion calculation, typical of mathematics problems. Given the information that the Cabernet Cafe sold eight times as much Cabernet Sauvignon as Zinfandel, we can set up a ratio and solve for the unknown. In this case, we know that the number of Cabernet Sauvignon sold is 8 times the amount of Zinfandel sold. If the cafe sold 5 bottles of Zinfandel, using the said proportion, we multiply 5 (number of Zinfandel bottles sold) by 8 (the given ratio) to find the number of Cabernet Sauvignon bottles sold - which is 40 bottles.
Learn more about Propotion calculation here:https://brainly.com/question/30179809
#SPJ12
Find the equation of the line going through the points (2,-1) and (5,2) 3x 2y
Answer:
The equation of the line is:
[tex]y = x - 3[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
The general equation of a straight line is given by:
[tex]y = ax + b[/tex]
Being given two points, we can replace x and y, solve the system and find the values for a and b.
Solution:
The line goes through the point [tex](2,-1)[/tex]. It means that when [tex]x = 2, y = -1[/tex]. Replacing in the equation:
[tex]y = ax + b[/tex]
[tex]-1 = 2a + b[/tex]
[tex]2a + b = -1[/tex]
The line also goes through the point [tex](5,2)[/tex]. It means that when [tex]x = 5 y = 2[/tex]. Replacing in the equation:
[tex]y = ax + b[/tex]
[tex]2 = 5a + b[/tex]
[tex]5a + b = 2[/tex]
Now we have to solve the following system of equations:
[tex]1) 2a + b = -1[/tex]
[tex]2) 5a + b = 2[/tex]
From 1), we have:
[tex]b = -1 - 2a[/tex]
Replacing in 2)
[tex]5a - 1 - 2a = 2[/tex]
[tex]3a = 3[/tex]
[tex]a = \frac{3}{3}[/tex]
[tex]a = 1[/tex]
[tex]b = -1 - 2a = -1 - 2 = -3[/tex]
The equation of the line is:
[tex]y = x - 3[/tex]
Exercise 4.x2 Make a reasonable conjecture about the nth term in the sequence. 1 3 16 125 1296...
Answer:
The nth term in the sequence is given by the equation:
[tex]n_{th} =(n+1)^{n-1}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Arranging a table for n and nth:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}n&nth\\1&1\\2&3\\2&16\\4&125\\5&1296\end{array}\right][/tex]
It is easier to notice that 16 and 125 result from the second power of 4 and the third of 5, respectively, which are one number below their respective position. That is why we can deduce that the base of the power is n+1.
For n=2, the base n+1 results in 3, which matches the nth term for n=2. Since 3 is the result of 3 to the power of 1, 16 is 4 to the power of 2, and 125 is 5 to the power of 3, all the powers are one number behind n, so the power is given by n-1, giving the equation:
[tex]n_{th} =(n+1)^{n-1}[/tex]
Chose parameters h and k such that the system has a) a unique solution, b) many solutions, and c) no solution. X1 + 3x2 = 4 2x1 + kx2 = h
Answer:
a) The system has a unique solution for [tex]k\neq 6[/tex] and any value of [tex]h[/tex], and we say the system is consisted
b) The system has infinite solutions for [tex]k=6[/tex] and [tex]h=8[/tex]
c) The system has no solution for [tex]k=6[/tex] and [tex]h\neq 8[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we need to base the solutions of the system on one of the independent terms ([tex]h[/tex]), the determinant method is not suitable and therefore we use the Gauss elimination method.
The first step is to write our system in the augmented matrix form:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc|c}1&3&4\\2&k&h\end{array}\right][/tex]
The we can use the transformation [tex]r_0\rightarrow r_0 -2r_1[/tex], obtaining:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc|c}1&3&4\\0&k-6&h-8\end{array}\right][/tex].
Now we can start the analysis:
If [tex]k\neq 6[/tex] then, the system has a unique solution for any value of [tex]k[/tex], meaning that the last row will transform back to the equation as:[tex](k-6)x_2=h-8\\x_2=h-8/(k-6)[/tex]
from where we can see that only in the case of [tex]k=6[/tex] the value of [tex]x_2[/tex] can not be determined.
if [tex]k=6[/tex] and [tex]h=8[/tex] the system has infinite solutions: this is very simple to see by substituting these values in the equation resulting from the last row:[tex](k-6)x_2=h-8\\0=0[/tex] which means that the second equation is a linear combination of the first one. Therefore, we can solve the first equation to get [tex]x_1[/tex] as a function of [tex]x_2[/tex] o viceversa. Thus, [tex]x_2[/tex] ([tex]x_1[/tex]) is called a parameter since there are no constraints on what values they can take on.
if [tex]k=6[/tex] and [tex]h\neq 8[/tex] the system has no solution. Again by substituting in the equation resulting from the last row:
[tex](k-6)x_2=h-8\\0=h-8[/tex] which is false for all values of [tex]h\neq 8[/tex] and since we have something that is not possible [tex](0\neq h-8,\ \forall \ h\neq 8)[/tex] the system has no solution
When 23 mL of water for injection is added to a drug-lyophilized powder, the resulting concentration is 200,000 units per mL. What is the volume of the dry powder if the amount of drug in the vial was 5,000,000 units? .
Answer:
2 mL
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Volume of water for injection = 23 mL
Resulting concentration = 200,000 units per mL
Amount of drug in the vial = 5,000,000 units
Now,
Let the final volume of the solution be 'x' mL
Now, concentration = [tex]\frac{\textup{units of the powder}}{\textup{Total volume of the soltuion}}[/tex]
thus,
200,000 = [tex]\frac{\textup{5,000,000}}{\textup{x}}[/tex]
or
x = 25 mL
also,
Total volume 'x' = volume of water + volume of powder
or
25 mL = 23 + volume of powder
or
Volume of powder = 2 mL
Medication Z is prescribed for a 50 kg woman and is to be given in enteric-coated pills of 125 mg per pill This medication is to be administered every 6 hours, but the total daily amount cannot exceed 8 mg.per kg of body weight per day. a) How many pills will this patient need? b) If the first dose is administered at 6 AM, when is the last dose given?
Answer:
a) The patient is going to need 3.2 pills. So four doses.
b) The last dose is at midnight, that i consider 12 PM
Step-by-step explanation:
This problem can be solved by a rule of three in which the measures are directly related, meaning that we have a cross multiplication.
a) How many pills will this patient need?
The first step is finding how many mg she is going to need.
She weighs 50kg, and the total daily amount cannot exceed 8 mg per kg of body. So:
1kg - 8 mg
50 kg - x mg
[tex]x = 50*8[/tex]
[tex]x = 400[/tex]mg.
Each dose has 125 mg, so she will need:
1 dose - 125 mg
x doses - 400mg
[tex]125x = 400[/tex]
[tex]x = \frac{400}{125}[/tex]
[tex]x = 3.2[/tex]
The patient is going to need 3.2 pills. So four doses.
b) If the first dose is administered at 6 AM, when is the last dose given?
There are four doses, administered every 6 hours.
6AM: First dose
12AM: Second dose
6PM: Third dose
12PM: Fourth Dose
The last dose is at midnight, that i consider 12 PM
Final answer:
To calculate the number of pills, we first determine the total daily allowable dosage based on the patient's weight and divide that by the dosage per pill, rounding up to provide whole pills. Then we schedule the medication every 6 hours starting from 6 AM, with the last dose at 12 AM.
Explanation:
The question involves calculating the appropriate dosage of medication for a patient based on weight and the maximum allowable daily dosage.
The medication prescribed is available as enteric-coated pills of 125mg each, and the patient requires a dosage that does not exceed 8mg per kg of their body weight per day.
The patient weighs 50 kg. To find the total daily dosage allowed, we multiply the patient's weight by the maximum mg per kg: 50 kg × 8 mg/kg = 400 mg.
Since the patient can have 400 mg of medication per day and the medication comes in 125 mg pills, we divide the total daily dosage by the dosage per pill: 400 mg ÷ 125 mg/pill = 3.2 pills.
Since we cannot give a patient a fraction of a pill, the patient will need 4 pills per day.
The medication must be administered every 6 hours. If the first dose is at 6 AM, the subsequent doses will be at 12 PM, 6 PM, and 12 AM, with the last dose given precisely 18 hours after the first dose.
Ravi takes classes at both Westside Community College and Pinewood Community College. At Westside, class fees are $98 per credit hour, and at Pinewood, class fees are S115 per credit hour. Ravi is taking a combined total of 18 credit hours at the two schools. Suppose that he is taking w credit hours at Westside. Write an expression for the combined total dollar amount he paid for his class fees. total paid (in dollars) - 0 x 5 ?
Answer:
98w +115(18-w)
Step-by-step explanation:
The fees per credit hour at Westside are $98.
The fees per credit hour at Pinewood are $115.
The total amount of hours is 18, this means the hours at Westside plus the hours at Pinewood add up to 18.
The problem asks us to name "w" the credit hours at Westside, therefore, the credit hours at Pinewood would be "18 - w"
Combining this information, we have that the combined total amount he paid would be:
(Fee per hour at Westside)(hours at Westside) + (Fee per hour at Pinewood)(hours at Pinewood) = Total
⇒98w + 115(18 - w) = Total
Final answer:
The expression for the combined total cost of Ravi's classes is 98w + 115(18 - w), where w represents the number of credit hours taken at Westside College, and (18 - w) represents the number of credit hours taken at Pinewood College.
Explanation:
To calculate the combined total cost of Ravi's classes at Westside Community College and Pinewood Community College, we can create an expression based on the number of credit hours he is taking at each school. If he is taking w credit hours at Westside, where the cost is $98 per credit hour, the total cost at Westside would be 98w. Since Ravi is taking a total of 18 credit hours at both schools combined, he would be taking (18 - w) credit hours at Pinewood, where the cost is $115 per credit hour. The total cost at Pinewood would therefore be 115(18 - w).
The expression for the combined total amount paid for Ravi's classes would be the sum of the costs for each school:
Total Paid = 98w + 115(18 - w)
Question 4 options:
Given the following definitions:
U = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g}
A = {a, c, e, g}
B = {a, b, c, d}
Find A'
Answer in roster form, with a single space after each comma.
Answer:
{ b, d, f }
Step-by-step explanation:
In the roster form we write the elements of a set by separating commas and enclose them within {} bracket.
We have give,
[tex]U = \{a, b, c, d, e, f, g\}[/tex],
[tex]A = \{a, c, e, g\}[/tex],
[tex]B = \{a, b, c, d\}[/tex],
[tex]\because A' = U - A[/tex]
[tex]\implies A' = \{a, b, c, d, e, f, g\} - \{a, c, e, g\}[/tex]
= { b, d, f }
Final answer:
A' is the complement of set A, consisting of elements in the universal set U that are not in A. Given U = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g} and A = {a, c, e, g}, A' is found to be {b, d, f}.
Explanation:
The complement of a set A, denoted by A', consists of all the elements in the universal set U that are not in A. Given the universal set U = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g} and set A = {a, c, e, g}, to find A' we need to identify all elements in U that are not in A.
To find A', we compare each element in U with the elements in A:
If the element is in A, we do not include it in A'.
If the element is not in A, we include it in A'.
After comparing, we find that A' consists of the elements {b, d, f} since these are the elements in U that are not present in set A.
Therefore, the roster form of A' with a single space after each comma is:
{b, d, f}
Learn more about Set Complement here:
https://brainly.com/question/30913259
#SPJ11
Kim uses two ropes to help support a newly planted tree. The ropes are placed on both sides of the tree and pinned to the ground, as shown in the diagram above. The length of each rope from the tree to the ground is 14 feet. The distance from the base of the tree to where it is pinned to the ground is 8 feet.
Enter the acute angle each rope makes with the ground, rounded to the nearest degree.
Answer:
Angle = 35°
Step-by-step explanation:
The figure would form a triangle and the tree will divide it into two 90 degree triangles.
Height of the triangles will be 8 feet which is opposite to the angle you have to find.
Hypotenuse of both 90 degree triangles will be 14 feet.
To find the angle, use the sin formula
sin (angle) = opposite/hypotenuse
angle = ?
opposite = 8
hypotenuse = 14
sin (angle) = 8/14
angle = sin inverse (0.57)
angle = 34.8° rounded off to 35°
The angle will be the same for both triangles.
Therefore, the acute angle each triangle makes with the ground is 35°.
If you had carried out the algebra using variables before plugging numbers into your expressions, you would have found that (vf)α=−2qαΔVmα−−−−−−−√, where ΔV is measured in volts. To verify that this expression for (vf)α has the correct units of velocity, you need to perform some unit analysis. Begin by finding the equivalent of a volt in terms of basic SI units. What is a volt in terms of meters (m), seconds (s), kilograms (kg), and coulombs (C)? Express your answer using the symb
A volt in terms of meters, seconds, kilograms, and coulombs is
[tex]$\frac{\text{kilogram} \times \text{meter}^2}{\text{second}^2 \times \text{coulomb}}$[/tex]
We are given that;
(vf)α=−2qαΔVmα
Now,
To find the equivalent of a volt in terms of basic SI units, we can use the definition of a volt as the potential difference that causes one joule of energy to be transferred per coulomb of charge.
A joule is the unit of energy, which is defined as the work done by a force of one newton over a distance of one meter.
A newton is the unit of force, which is defined as the product of mass and acceleration. Therefore, we can write:
[tex]$1 \text{ volt} = \frac{1 \text{ joule}}{1 \text{ coulomb}} = \frac{1 \text{ newton} \times 1 \text{ meter}}{1 \text{ coulomb}} = \frac{1 \text{ kilogram} \times 1 \text{ meter} \times 1 \text{ meter}}{1 \text{ second}^2 \times 1 \text{ coulomb}}$[/tex]
Simplifying, we get:
[tex]$1 \text{ volt} = \frac{\text{kilogram} \times \text{meter}^2}{\text{second}^2 \times \text{coulomb}}$[/tex]
Therefore, by volt answer will be [tex]$\frac{\text{kilogram} \times \text{meter}^2}{\text{second}^2 \times \text{coulomb}}$[/tex].
To learn more about volt visit;
https://brainly.com/question/29014695
#SPJ12
A volt is a unit of potential difference, which is measured in joules per coulomb (V). 1 volt is equal to 1 joule per coulomb (1 V = 1 J/C).
Explanation:The potential difference between two points A and B, VB - VA, is defined as the change in potential energy divided by the charge q. This potential difference is measured in joules per coulomb, which is called a volt (V). To express a volt in terms of the basic SI units of meters (m), seconds (s), kilograms (kg), and coulombs (C), we need to use the equation J = V × C, where J represents the unit of energy, the joule.
We can rewrite the equation J = V × C as V = J / C. Since 1 V is equivalent to 1 J/C, we can express the volt in terms of meters (m), seconds (s), kilograms (kg), and coulombs (C) as:
1 V = 1 J/C
Learn more about potential difference here:https://brainly.com/question/23716417
#SPJ3
hugh and janet are dining out at a cafe that has on its menu 6 entrees, 5 salads and 10 desserts. They decide thy will each order a different entree, salad, and dessert, and share the portions. how many different meals are possible?
Answer: 300
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : Hugh and Janet are dining out at a cafe that has on its menu 6 entrees, 5 salads and 10 desserts.
They decide thy will each order a different entree, salad, and dessert, and share the portions.
Then, the number of different meals are possible :-
[tex]6\times5\times10=300[/tex]
Hence, the number of different meals are possible =300
Need Help Fast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What is meant by the "complexity of an algorithm"?
Answer: Algorithm complexity or the complexity of an algorithm is known as a measure under which one evaluates degree of count of operations, that are specifically performed by an algorithm which is taken in consideration as a function of size of the data. In rudimentary terms, it is referred to as a rough approximation of number of stages required in order to enforce an algorithm.
If AA and BB are countable sets, then so is A∪BA∪B.
Answer with Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that A and B are two countable sets
We have to show that if A and B are countable then [tex]A\cup B[/tex] is countable.
Countable means finite set or countably infinite.
Case 1: If A and B are two finite sets
Suppose A={1} and B={2}
[tex]A\cup B[/tex]={1,2}=Finite=Countable
Hence, [tex]A\cup B[/tex] is countable.
Case 2: If A finite and B is countably infinite
Suppose, A={1,2,3}
B=N={1,2,3,...}
Then, [tex]A\cup B[/tex]={1,2,3,....}=N
Hence,[tex]A\cup B[/tex] is countable.
Case 3:If A is countably infinite and B is finite set.
Suppose , A=Z={..,-2,-1,0,1,2,....}
B={-2,-3}
[tex]A\cup B[/tex]=Z=Countable
Hence, [tex]A\cup B[/tex] countable.
Case 4:If A and B are both countably infinite sets.
Suppose A=N and B=Z
Then,[tex]A\cup B[/tex]=[tex]N\cup Z[/tex]=Z
Hence,[tex]A\cup B[/tex] is countable.
Therefore, if A and B are countable sets, then [tex]A\cup B[/tex] is also countable.
Answer:
To remedy confusions like yours and to avoid the needless case analyses, I prefer to define X to be countable if there is a surjection from N to X.
This definition is equivalent to a few of the many definitions of countability, so we are not losing any generality.
It is a matter of convention whether we allow finite sets to be countable or not (though, amusingly, finite sets are the only ones whose elements you could ever finish counting).
So, if A and B be countable, let f:N→A and g:N→B be surjections. Then the two sequences (f(n):n⩾1)=(f(1),f(2),f(3),…) and (g(n):n⩾1)=(g(1),g(2),g(3),…) eventually cover all of A and B, respectively; we can interleave them to create a sequence that will surely cover A∪B:
(h(n):n⩾1):=(f(1),g(1),f(2),g(2),f(3),g(3),…).
An explicit formula for h is h(n)=f((n+1)/2) if n is odd, and h(n)=g(n/2) if n is even.
Hope it helps uh mate...✌
"The diagram above represents a square garden. If each side of the garden is increased in length by 50%, by what percent is the area of the garden increased?" Whats the explanation for this problem, I cant seem to figure it out?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's say that each side of the square is of length [tex]s[/tex]. The area of this square would then be:
[tex]A = s^{2}[/tex]
If we increase the length of each side by 50%, then the length becomes [tex]1.5s[/tex], which will result in the area being:
[tex]A = (1.5s)(1.5s)[/tex]
[tex]A = 2.25s^{2}[/tex]
This means the area has increased by [tex]1.25[/tex] the original amount, or 125%.
The provider orders digoxin pediatric elixir 60 mcg, PO, BID. The bottle of elixir contains 0.05 mg per 1 ml. Calculate the dosage in ml. (round to nearest tenth)
Answer:
The dosage has 1.2ml
Step-by-step explanation:
This problem can be solved as a rule of three problem.
In a rule of three problem, the first step is identifying the measures and how they are related, if their relationship is direct of inverse.
When the relationship between the measures is direct, as the value of one measure increases, the value of the other measure is going to increase too.
When the relationship between the measures is inverse, as the value of one measure increases, the value of the other measure will decrease.
Unit conversion problems, like this one, is an example of a direct relationship between measures.
First step: The first step is the conversion from mcg to mg.
The bottle has 60 mcg. How much is this in ml? 1 mcg has 0.001mg. So:
1 mcg - 0.001mg
60mcg - x mg
x = 60*0.001
x = 0.06mg
Final step: The bottle of elixir contains 0.05 mg per 1 ml. Calculate the dosage in ml.
The dosage has 0.06 mg, so:
0.05mg - 1 ml
0.06mg - xml
0.05x = 0.06
[tex]x = \frac{0.06}{0.05}[/tex]
x = 1.2ml
The dosage has 1.2ml
A. One day Annie weighed 24 ounces more than Benjie, and Benjie weighed 3 1/4 pounds less than Carmen. How did Annie’s and Carmen’s weights compare on that day?
B. Why can’t you tell how much each person weighed?
Draw diagrams to support your answer.
A.
Let Annie's weight be = a
Let Benjie's weighs = b
Let Carmen's weight be = c
One day Annie weighed 24 ounces more than Benjie, equation forms:
[tex]a=b+24[/tex] ......(1)
Benjie weighed 3 1/4 pounds less than Carmen.
In ounces:
1 pound = 16 ounces
[tex]\frac{13}{4}[/tex] pounds = [tex]\frac{13}{4}\times16=52[/tex] ounces
[tex]b=c-52[/tex] or
[tex]c=b+52[/tex] ......(2)
Now adding (1) and (2), we get
a+b=b+24+c-52
=> [tex]a=c-28[/tex]
This gives Annie weighs 28 ounces less than Carmen.
B.
We cannot know anyone's actual weight, as we only know their relative weights.
Can someone help me solve this Statistics homeworl? Thanks!
Answer:
b. 5
Step-by-step explanation:
In a stem and leaf plot, each observation is split into a stem (the first digit or digits) and a leaf (usually the last digit).
In this example, the entries in the 20s, 30s, and 40s are:
20, 20, 24, 25, 26, 35, 36, 43, 43
We omit 20, 20, 43, and 43 because they are not between 20 and 40.
That leaves the five observations
24, 25, 26, 35, 36
If triangle MNP is congruent to triangle PNM, classifytriangle
MNP by its sides.
Answer:
MNP is a Congruent Triangle according to Side-Side-Side Congruence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Whenever we talk about Euclidean Geometry and Congruence of Triangles. We are taking into account that in any given plane, three given points, in this case, M, N, and P is and its segments between two points make up a Triangle.
In this case MNP and an identical one and PNM
To be called congruent, it's necessary to have the same length each side and when it comes to angles, congruent angles have the same measure.
A postulate, cannot be proven since it's self-evident. And there's one that fits for this case which says
"Every SSS (Side-Side-Side) correspondence is a congruence"
So this is why we can classify MNP as Side-Side-Side congruence since its segments are the same size MN, NP, and MP for both of them. The order of the letters does not matter.
Use z scores to compare the given values.
Based on sample data, newborn males have weights with a mean of 3232.9 g and a standard deviation of 714.6 g. Newborn females have weights with a mean of 3094.9 g and a standard deviation of 586.3 g. Who has the weight that is more extreme relative to the group from which they came: a male who weighs 1600 g or a female who weighs 1600 g?
Since the z score for the male is z =__ and the z score for the female is z=__, the
female or male(which one) has the weight that is more extreme.
Answer:
Female
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for finding z-score is;
z=(x-μ)/δ
where x= weight given=1600g
μ=mean weight given
δ=standard deviation given
For male
x=1600g
μ=3232.9g
δ=714.6g
z=(1600-3232.9)/714.6
z= -2.3
The weight for the male is 2.3 standard deviations below the mean
For female
x=1600g
μ=3094.9g
δ=586.3g
z=(1600-3094.9)/586.3
z= -2.5
The weight for the female is 2.5 standard deviations below the mean
⇒The female has the weight that is more extreme
Answer:
z= 1
Step-by-step explanation:
got it on egde